DECISIONS CASES RELATING TO THE PUBLIC LANDS

DECISIONS

OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

IN

CASES RELATING TOTHE PUBLIC LANDS

EDITED BY GEORGE J. HESSELMAN

- VOLUME 44

MARCH 1, 1915-FEBRUARY 29, 1916

WASHINGTON

1916

This publication (volumes 1 to 44 and digest covering volumes 1 to 40, in-clusive) is held for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Office of PublicPrinter, Washington,, D. C., to whom all correspondence relating thereto shouldbe addressed.

III

OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR.

ALEXANDER T. VOGELSANG, Soticitor.'

GEORGE B. GARDNER,EDWARD C. FINNEY,

WILLIAM B. NEWMAN,Board of Appeals.

ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS.

P. S. BLACK.B. B. CARRIER.W. L. CHITTY.J. J. COTTER.

M. A. CRAM.E. L. CuLVER.

W. G. FEELY.

C. J. GROSECLOSE.E. J. HARTSHORN.G. J. HESSELMAN'

J. W. HOLCOMBE.

0. W. LANGE.VILLARD MARTIN.

3. R. MITCHELL.G. H. NEWVM AN.L. A. PALMER.

A. W. PATTERSON.EDSON PHILLIPS.

W. C. PontsCoi.

G. C. ROSS.J. H. THOMAS.J. F. TUFTS.

G. A. WARREN.

J. R. WEBSTER.J. W. WITTEN.

C. E. WRIGHT.

IV

I Assumed office Feb. 24, 191.6, vice Preston C. W"est, resigned.

TABLE OF CASES REPORTED.

[For Table of Unreported Cases see page 591.]

Alaska Anthracite Coal Co. et atAlaska Lands _--__- ____-__Allen, Sarah E. (On rehear-

ing) _ ___________---__Arkansas Sunk Lands __-___Astle, Mouritsen v___-_-_-_-_

Baart, Catherine _- ___-_Barger, Sherman--_ ___- ___Beckman v. Tady _ I---Benson, George N., et at _-__-_Bering Sea Commercial Co ___Bloom v, Holmes - ______-___Bookout, Marion L ___Bothwell, George W ___-___Brasier, Walter G., et at __Braucht et at. v. Northern Pa-

Page.9

22

331207378

3865015004183

148329

75541

cifc Ry. Co. et at -__ 225Brown, Frenchie E --_-____ 374Bruce, Voigt v -___ --------_ 524Bryant v. Hammer -- __-_____ 152

Califotnia, State of, et at-_ 27,118, 120,127, 468

Capin, Nathaniel J _--______ 222Chippewa Indian Lands -__ 552Clear Water Timber Co ___ - 516Cluster, Daniel B --_-__-_-___21, 229Collins, Peter M__ _-- ___ 495Coursolle, Albert A., et at ___ 188Crow Indian Lands_-_______- 121Cunningham, Robert Ht., et al _ 577Cusick, Robert G -_-- __-_-_ 576

Damon, Henqricks v -- 205Dawkins v. Hedin ___-__-____-371Delano v. Messer et at -- __ 199Dennis, William EB -- 588Douglass, Earl- _- __-325, 326

Earaheart, William F----- 3Eastwood, Hester v_ __-____-508Erickson, August --__-__-___- 215

Page.Flathead Indian Reservation__ 12,

39, 240Fort Berthold Landst 382,452, 455, 575Fort Lowell Military Reserva-

tion ----- ___________-- _ 485Fowler, A. J -_--___-__-____ 568French, Hare et at. v -- 217Fritz, Fredericka :-___-____- 570

Gammill v. Thompson __-_-_-_Garrett, Fred B., et at _______Garrett, State of New Mexico v_Gauss v. Phelps ___- _._-_Geiss, Peter _ _ ----George, Charlie, et al t ______Goudy v. Heirs of Morgan___-_Gunn, Nelson, et aL t- ____

476115489180390113376486

Hall, Thomas ------- 113Hammer, Bryant v --__-_____152Hard, Effie A- -- _-__-_479Hare- et at. v.- French-------- 217Harper, Henry H -____-_-__220Hayes, Roy H., et at __-_____ 29Redinj Dawkins v --____-____371-Heirs of Morgan, Goudy v____ 376Henderson, Lias v --___ 542, 544Hendricks v. Damon ----------- 205Herrin v. Stanley --______-_ 579Hester v. Eastwood ----------- 508Hewitt, Northern Pacific Ry.

Co. v--___--__--_--___449, 452Holmes, Bloom v ____ _148Horton, Frank 0 -- _______ 539Hurley, Jacoh --_--_-___-_357,.358Huston, Frank L --__-___-__ 505

Icicle Canal Company -_-_-___511Idaho, State of, v. O'Donnell 8 345Idaho, State of, v. Roberson ___ 448

Judy, Leslie D ------- - 8- I-- 380Juhl, Chris -_-_- __-_-_---- 413

v

TABLE OF CASES REPORTED.

Kain, John Lawrence _-____Keaster, Mullin v ______-___Keepers, Tillian et al. v __-_-_Keller, Oliver CKennedy v. Severance ____-__King, Charles H __-_-______Kinney, fEi. C - ----Kiowa, etc., Indian Lands __Kuhn, Mast v ____- _______-_

Lambrecht, State of Minnesota

Page

55(16:46(52(3787858486721

)

-v.-888 _ 38S, 389Larson, Lewis H ------------- 354Lawson, Lizzie __________ 585Lessman, Joseph B8 _-_______ 347Lias v. Henderson_---------- 542, 544Lipscomb, Fannie -______ --- 414Littlejohn, Nelson J ----- 48Locher, Josephine M1 -- __- 134Long, William C -44Lott, McGraw v8 __ _ __-_ 367Louthain et al. v. Munzer et al- 125Lowry, Cyrus G - 8 ------- 348Lusby et-al., State of Washing-

ton' v- - _---- ___---- 26

Marcy, William L -____-___-_153Martin, Harry E __-8____ 393Mast v. Kuhn- -____-_____-__- 72McCurdy, Schmidt v-_____ 568McGinley, William ___ _-__-583McGraw v. Lott8 ______-__ 367McKittrick Oil Co -8 ___-___ 340Messer et al., Delano v' _____ 199Miller et al., Nienhenser v --- 238,239Minnesota, State of, v. Lam-

brecht -88 8 ------------- - , 388 9Montezuma Gold and Silver

Mining Co- - ___----__ 173Morgan, Heirs of, Goudy v_ 8_ 376Morris, Robert L --_-_-__ 439, 441Moses, William EiL_ _483Mossman, Maud, et al t-8-_- 391Mouritsen v.. Astle 8 _-_-_-__ 378Mullin v. Keaster -- _____ 161Munzer et al., Louthain et al. v_ 125Murray, Thomas J_---------- 492Musser, Jennie P --____-_-____494

Nelson, Northern Pacific Ry.Co. V'a_--__--_____--__

Nelson, Tripp v'a___ -_-_506156

Page.New Mexico, State of, v. Gar-

rett --------------------- 489Nicol, James W ____-_-_-__- 197Nicholson v. Wagoner8 8-___ 337Nienheuser v. Miller et al _ 238, 239Northern Pacific Ry. Co -_ 73, 218Northern Pacific Ry. Co. et al.,

Braucht et al. v _ __ - 225Northern Pacific Ry. Co., Reich-

ert v _______--______--__- 78Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v.

Hewitt ------------------- 449, 452Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Nel-

son -_--__--_--------_--_ 506

O'Donnell, State of Idaho v----Oklahoma, State of _-_-_-_Oregon, State of _-______

345835123

Pacific Midway Oil Co. et al_ 420, 438Payne, William C., et al t------- 243Peabody, Blanche W --------- 219Pederson, Fred, et alt--------- 129Phelps, Gauss v'a ___-_-__- 180Pool, Orin D _ __-____ 137Pride,'Edward E______------- 28Proclamation (Ft. Berthold

Lands) -------------------- 452

Reichert v. Northern PacificRy. Co ------------- ---

Riddick, Carl W _-_-_-_____Roberson, State of Idaho v _-_Robison, John ________-__

7865

448150

Salmon, Albert M -- __ 491San Francisco Chemical Co __ 356Santa Fe Pacific R. R. Co -_ 509Santa Fe Pacific R. R. Co. et al 143Schmidt v. McCurdy---------- 568Schwerdfield, State of Washing-

ton v'a - ___--___------___ 144Severance, Kennedy -v ______ 373Shanks, William L __-__-_-_- 502Similkameen Power Co. et al__ 471Skeen, Vance v '--_________ 52Smith, Manuel -- __- ______ 489Smith, Wright et al. v'a -------. 226Standing Rock Indian Lands_ 1,43Stanley, Herrin v'. -________ 579.State of California et alt -_-_ 27,

11S, 120, 127, 468State of Idaho v. O'Donnell 8 345

L

3r

III

~VI

iAfLtE OFI' UXA

: Page.State of Idaho v. Roberson 448State of Minnesota v. Lam-

brecht ____ I--------3-- , 3S89State of New Mexico v. Garrett- 489State of Oklahoma -- 335State of Oregon __-_-_-______- 123State of Washington v. LusbyIet al --_-__----_____---_-_ 26

State of Washington v. Schwerd-field -____ --------------_ 144

Stockley, Thomas J _- _-_-178, 150

Tady, Beckman v ____ __--- - 500Tapp, Ward v __ - ---------- 157, 159Thompson, Gammill v -- _ 476Thuras, Anton 0 -------- - 54Tillian et al. v. Keepers _- _ 460Tripp County Lands- _ _ 195Tripp v. Nelson -_ ___ _ 156Turtle Mountain Indians - 524Tymofjczuk, Andro ----------- 327

SES REPORTED. VII

Page.Van Gass, Nicholas_______-____ 139Vance v. Skeen ________ ______ 52Vanderport, James =_ 140Venator, Josephine _- ___- 212Voigt v. Bruce _ _-___-_- 524

Wagoner, Nicholson v _-__- 337Ward v. Tapp -_____-__-_ 157, 159Washington, State of, v. Lusby

et at -___--____--__--____ 26Washington, State of, v.

Schwerdfield ------------ 144Weekes, Fred C. and George D 468Weinberger, Jacob --_-_-_____ 548Williams, Archibald -__-__-_-_ 244Wisconsin Central Settlers_ _- 31Wright, Charles T., et at.L _- 531Wright et al. v. Smith _____ 226

i On page 535, first line of next to last paragraph, for " no " read " now."

TABLE OF CASES CITED.

[The abbreviation " L. D." refers to this publication; "B. L. P." to Brainard's Legal Prece-dents; " 1 C. L. L." to Copp's Public Land Laws, Ed, 1875; "2 C. L. L." to Copp's PublicLand Laws, Ed. 1882 i " C. L. O." to Copp's Land Owner; "C. M. D." to Copp's MiningDecisions; " C. M. L." to Copp's Mineral Lands; " Lester," to Lester's Land Laws andDecisions; " S. lI. D." to Sickels's Mining Laws and Decisions; and " C. Cis." to theCourt of Claims.

Page.Administrative Ruling, 43 L. D.,

293______--___ ------ 27, 119, 121, 468Ady v. Boyle, 17 L. D., 529 __-__-_- 379Allen, Sarah E., 40 L. D., 588 332American Isfsurance Co. v. Canter,

1 Pet., 511 _________ L_ 443Anderson v. Hillerud, 33 L. '.,

335 _-- ____-- ____-- ____- 149Arkansas Sunk Lands, 37 L. D., 345,

462_ _______-- ____--_________- 207Armstrong v. Matthews, 40 L. D.,

496_ --------------------------- 156Atlantic and Pacific Ry. Co., 5 L. D.,

2 __________________ _ 584, 588

Baker, William D., 12 L. D., 127_ 584,3587,588

Balderston v. Brady, 107 Pac. 493__ 448Barksdale v. Rhodes, 28 L. D., 136__ 377Barnard v. Ashley's Heirs, 18 Holw.,

43- ---------------------------- 419Beard v. Rowan, 9 Pet., 301______- 205Beecher v. Wetherby, 95 U. S., 517i 462Bell v. Skillicorn, 28 Pac., 768_____ 176Bender v. Shimer, 19 L. D., 363____ 585,

587, 589Betts v. Shumaker, 21 L. D., 461 --- 168Birkholz, John, 27 L. D., 59_---- 114,487Bishop of Nesqually v. Gibbon, 158

U. S., 15533. __________ _ 534Bookout, Marion L., 41 L. D.,

381 ------------------------330, 375Boone v. Chiles, 10 Pet., 177T----- 499Borgwardt v. Mclfittrick Oil Co.,

164 Cal., 650; 130 Pac., 417--- 344, 436Bourassa, Ellen, et al., 43 L. D.,

149 __-- _-- ___---- ________- 524Boyle, William, 38 L. D., 603 ---- 335Bradley v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.,

36 L. D., 7; 37 L. D., 410 ------ 78Bradley v. Vasold, 36 L. D., 106___L 167Braucht et al. v. Northern Pacific

Ry. Co. et al., 43 L. D., 536, 538._ 225Breutinger, Louis W., et al., 42

L. D., 489, 491_______________-193, 523Brice, George F., 37 L. D., 145 3---- 540Bridges v. Curran, 7 L. D., 395_---- 168Brown Bear Coal Association, 42

-L. D., 320- --------------------- 481

VIII

Bruns, Henry A., 15 L. D., 170 ___Burke v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co.,

234 U. S., 669 ____-__-___-__Burns, Frank, 10 L. D., 3635______Butte City Water Co. v. Baker, 196

U. S., 127 ______--__-_

Page.549

24549

418

California, State of, et al., 41 L. D.,592 ___---- ______-- ___- 128

Campbell, Daniel, 22 L. D., 673_- 584,587, 588

Carr v. Fife, 156 U. S., 494________- 201Carthage Fuel Co., 41 L. D., 21_---- 481Cate v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co., 41

L. D., 316_------------------ 349, 414Catholic Bishop of Nesqually v. Gib-

bon, 158 U. S., 155____________- 534Chapman and Dewey Lumber Co. v.

St. Francis Levee District, 232-U. S., 186- - __--- _______ 210

Chicago Placer Mining Claim, 34L. D., 9- -________--__--______ 342

Clark v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.,I3 L. D., 158 -__________ 584, 587, 588

Clement, Edward C., 10 L. D., 338._ 540Cluster, Daniel B., 44 L. D., 21__--- 230Cole Alonzo B., 38 L. D., 420______- 169Colorado Coal and Iron Co. v. United

States, 123 U. S., 307______--__. 462Colorado, State of, 6 L. D., 412_____- 462Cooley av. Boafd of Wardens, 12

How., 3153 ____ __ 419Cooper v, Roberts, 18 How., 173____- 462Craig v. Bradford, 3 Wheat., 594___- 205

*Craig v. Leslie, 3 Wheat., 563 __ 205Cross v. De Valle, 1 Wall., 5_ _ 205

Dalton v. Hazelet, 182 Fed., 561_. 23, 447Daniels a. Wagner, 237 U. S., 547__ 155Davis, Katharine, 30 L. D., 220 __ 81, 379Davis, Heirs of Susan A., 40 L. D.,

573 --------- __ __ _ _ _ ----------- 234Davis v. Weibbold, 139 U. S., 507__ 23, 462Decker v. Pacific Coast Co., 164

Fed., 974 __=_-- __-- _-____- 447De Courcy v. Vandevert, 38 L. D.,

457 -- -- --- ------------------ - 37 9Deffeback v. Hawke, 115 U. S., 3902 23, 462

-TABLE OF CASES CITED. Il

I Page.De Long, Heirs of Frederick C., 36

L. D., 332_--_ __ ____ _ ___ 18Derrick v. State of California, 27

L. D., 644 -______--___________ 492Ditmar, Dorathy, 43 L. D., 104 __ 520, 571Doe, ea dem Governeur v. Robert-- son, 11 Wheat., 332 ____ _ 205Doherty v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.,

177 U. S., 421- - _-___________ 218Dow v. Young, 4 New England

Repte., 503__________3______-__ 510Duncan v. Archambault, 35 L. D.,

498 _--_--_--__------__--_____- 132Dunlap v. Shingle Springs and Plac-

erville R. R. Co., 23 L. D., 67--_ 9

Eaton et al. v. Northern Pacific Ry.Co., 33 L. D., 426 __-_-__-_

Eaton, Guy A., 32 L. D., 644______Emblen V. Lincoln Land Co., 184

U. S., 660_____________-_____Ewing, Heirs of, v. Cayton, 36 L. D.,

474- - _---- __-- __---- _--_---

Fairbanks v. United States, 181U. S., 307--------------------

Fairbanks v. United States, 223U. S., 215_ _-- _-- __-- ____

Falje v. Moe, 28 L. D., 371_____-__Fergus, Andrew, 29 L. D., 5336_ _Flynn, Patrick, 39 L. D.; 593------Fort Maginnis, 1 L. D., 552_______Fort Peck Lands; 42 L. D., 264_ __French v. Tatro, 2 C. L. L., 585---Fresnol Water Right Canal, 35

L. D., 550- - _________-____-Frost v. Wenie, 157 U. S., 46 _____

80493

501

201

419

537.379245150581502540

512355

Galbraith v. Shasta Iron Co., 76Pac., 901 ______-- ______- 176

Gardner, Edward, 42 L. D., 615-- 135, 339Gardner v. Bonestell, 180 U. S., 362_ 201Germaina Iron Co. v. James et al.,

89 Fed., 811 _-- ___--_-____ 224Gonzales v. French,.164 U. S., 338- 201Grand Canyon Ry. Co. v. Cameron,

36 L. D., 66 _____--________- 168Griffith v. Godey, 113 U. S., 89 ___ 205Grisar v. McDowell, 6 Wall., 363__ 582Grundy's Heils v. Grundy, 12 B.

Mon., 269 ____-- _-- _=_- 45Gunderson v. Northern Pacific Ry.

Co., 37 L. D., 1153 ______ __ 223

Ilafemann v. Gross, 199 U. S., 343--Hall, Thomas, 44 L. D., 113 __Hall v. State of Oregon, 32 L. D.,

5 6 53 ------- -------------------Hall v. Stone, 16 L. D., 199_____-_Hamilton, Rachael J., 43 L. D.,

504 ---------------------------Hanrick a. Patrick, 119 U. S., 156__Hara, Ski, 36 L. D., 277 ________Harris, Jacob A., 42 L. D., 611_ __Harrison v. Talbot, 2 Dana, 258_ _--

488487

81379

52420520322045

Page.Hastings and Dakota R. R. Co. v.

Whitney, 132 U. S., 366 ___-__- 419Hatfield, Smith, 17 L. D., 79 3____ 585,

587, 589Hauenstein v. Lynham, 100 U. S.,

483- - _-- _______--__-____-- 205Hawley v. Diller, 178 U. S., 476___- 589Heirs of Ewing v. Cayton, 36 L. D.,

474 - ________ 201Heirs of Frederick C. De Long, 36

L. D., 332 ____ I----------_ 18heirs of Susan A. Davis, 40 L. D.,

573 _--_____________--_____--- 234Henderson, John W., 40 L. D., 518;

43 L. D., 1061 ----- - 12Hewitt v. Schultz, 180 U. S., 130 _ 450Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Sil-

ver Mining Co., 93 U. S., 634___ 462Hibbs, M. R., 42 L. D., 408 __-___ 359Hogan v. Page, 69 U. S., 605 ____ 518Hhoglund, Svan, 43 L. D., 538, 540_ 118Hollensteiner, Walter, 38 L. D., 319 584,

587, 589Holme v. Jankowski et al., 39 L. D.,

225 3- -------- -------- ----- 368Holt v. Murphy,. 207 U. S., 407 -_-_ 224Hopkins, Howard C., 40 L. D., 318_ 155Horton, Frank O., 44 L. D., 539---- 551Humbird v. Avery, 195 U. S., 480. 450, 507

Illinois, State of, v. Illinois CentralR. R. Co., 33 Fed., 730 --------- 446

Jenne, Jacob, 40 L. D., 408 __ 484Johnson v. Towsley, 13 Wall., 72_--- 201

Keogh, Thomas J., 42 L. D., 28 _ 488Kin-nip-pah et al., 41 L. D., 626___ 524Knight v. Hoppin, 18 L. D., 324___ 585,

- 5~~~~~~~87, 380Knight v. United States Land Asso-

ciation, 142 U. S., 161 ___ 168, 443

Laird, Maggie, 13 L. D., 502 ___ 81Larson, Frank, 23 L. D., 452____ 114,487Leath v. Pope, 41 L. D., 387_____- 440Lee v. Alderson, 11 L. D., 58_ ___ 478Le Marchal v. Tegarden, 175 Fed.,

682 __ ____-- _----_--_-__- 176Lewis v. Johnson, 1 Alaska, 77__ 447Lincoln v. Gisselberg, 17 L. D., 215 150Lipscomb, Fannie, 44 L. D., 414__ _ 146Little v. Williams, 231 U. S., 335- 210Littlejohn, Nelson J., 353L. D., 638_ 166Lopez, Romona, 29 L. D., 639 3__ 584,

587, 589Luthye v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.,

29 L. D., 675 3---------------- 74Lydick, Nellie, 29 L. D., 408 ____ 537Lyman, Mary O., 24 L. .D., 493_ 114, 487

Mann, Jane, 18 L. D., 116__ ____Mann v. Tacoma Land Co., 153 U. S.,

273 __ ----------Marcy v. Darling, 8 Pick., 283 _-_

150

444444

0


Page.Maybury v. Hazletine, 82 L. D., 41_ 223McComas, James M., 33 L. D., 447__ 355McCraney v. Heirs of Hayes, 33 L.

D., 21 -478McGarrahan v. Mining Co., 96 U. S.,

316 8 _----------------------_ 547McKann v. Hatten, 11 L. D., 75-- 162McKittrick Oil Co., 42 L. D., 317__ 341McKittrick Oil Co. v. Southern Pa-

rific R. R. Co., 37 L. D., 243---- 340McLemore v. Express Oil Co., 158

Cal., 559 ___________--_-____- 435McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S., 1 419,Mee v. 'Hughart et al., 23 L. D.,

455 _______________________ 114,487Meyer v. Mitchell, 9 L. D., 287----- 477Miller, William J., 15 L. D., 142_-- 542Mills v. Daily, 17 L. D., 345_-8___ 379Miner, Abraham L., 9 L. D., 408_ 462Mining Co. v. Consolidated Mining

Co., 102 U. S., 167 -- __ 462Morrill v. Jones, 106 U. S., 466_ __ 220Morton, John S., 34 L. D., 441 _-_ 493Moses, Zelmer R., 36 L. D., 473---- 570Mullan v. United States, 118 U. S.,

271 ---------------------------_ 462Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Arm-

strong, 117 U. S., 591 ______ 518

Narver v. Eastman, 34 L. D., 123_ 130Navajo Indian Reservation, 30 L. D.,

515 ------ 7 ___-- ____-_-__-__ 582Neal v. Davis, 99 Pac., 69 2___ _ 440Nelson v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.,

188 U. S., 108 __- __-____-_- 507Northern Pacific Ry. Co., 21 L. D.,

412 ______-- _____--___- 218Northern Pacific Ry. Co., 86 L. D.,

328-__l_ _______---- ___--__ 21ENorthern Pacific Ry. Co., 39 L. D.,

314 ______ L---- 219Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Hunt,

18 L. D., 163__3 __-_-___-_- S79Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Morton,

43 L. D., 60 _____________ 349, 414Noyes v. Montana, 29 L. D., 695 847, 416

Oakes v. United States, 172 Fed.,3 0 5 -- -- ----- -----------------

O'Connell v. Duke, 29 Tex., 299 __Ohio, State of, 10 L. D., 394 585, 587,Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. Carpen-

ter, 4 Nev., 534____________---_Opinion of Attorney General, 29 Op.

A. G., 455---------------------Orchard v. Alexander, 157 U. S., 372_Oregon, State of, 32 L. D., 664-_--Oregon a. Hitchcock, 202 U. S., 60Ostenfeldt, Charles L., 41 L. D., 265-Osterman v. Baldwin, 6 Wall. 116_Owen, John S., 32 L. D., 262 0__-_

Pacific Coast Co. a. McCloskey, 3Alaska, 77_---------------------

53745

589

437

557201124201463205246

447

Page.Pacific Coast Marble Co. v. North-

ern Pacific R. R. Co., 25 L. D.,233 8__________________--__- 326

Page, Frank N., 10 L. D., 17 -___ 540Peck, Frank G., 34 L. D., 682 _--__ 177Pelham, Charles W., 39 L. D., 201__ 38Pharr v. Russell, 7 Ired., 222 45Phillips v. Moore, 100 U. S., 208___ 205Plested, William G., et al., 40 L. D.,

610 ________--____---584, 587, 588Pratt, George B., et al., 88 L. D.,

146- - _-- ____-- _____--____ 484Pratt v. Bowman, 37 W. Va., 715_ - 46

Rancho Corte de Madera del Presidio,1 L. D., 232_ -_-- _ _ 585, 587, 589

Ray v. Shirley, 34 L. D., 30 -__ 339Reason, Alice M., 36 L. D., 279-- 223Rees v. Central Pacific R. B. Co.,

5 L. D., 277 ----------- 585, 587, 589Reichert v. Northern Pacific Ry.

Co., 44 L. D., 78_------------ 206, 379Rice v. State of California, 24 L. D.,

14 -____________ - -_-____-462Rico Townsite, 1 L. D., 556 ____ 199Rinehart, L. B., 10 L. D., 303_----- 492Roberts v. Spencer, 40T L. D., 306__ 501Robinson, Howard A., 43 L. D., 221_ 487Rogers v. Hawley et al., 115 Pac.,

687 ------------------ _.__ 449Rogers v. Southern Pacific Ry. Co.,

43 L. D., 208 ___-- ___-_-___- 497

St. Paul, Minneapolis and ManitobaRy. Co. v. Donohue, 210 U. S., 36_- 418,

5S5, 587Santa Fe Pacific R. R. Co. v. Rank-

lev, 34 L. D., 380 -------------- 379Saugstad v. Fay, 39 L. D., 160 ____ 869Saunders v. Baldwin, 9 L. D., 391__ 2.68Schimmelpfenny, George, 15 L. D.,

549 ___ _-______- 492Schultz v. Hewitt, 76 N. W., 230 _ 450Schumacher v. State of Washington,

33 TI. D., 454 __--__-_-____-_- 416Seitz v. Wallace, 6 L. D., 299______-168Shaw v. Kellogg, 170 U. S., 312_ -- 24Slestreem v. Korn, 43 L. D., 200___ 440Sinnott v. Jewett, 33 TI D., 91 --- 176Snow Flake Fraction Placer, 37

L. D., 250_ ___-- ____-___ 291South Dakota v. Delicate, 34 L. D.,

717- - __-- ______-- _----_-- 462South Dakota v. Riley, 34 L. D.,

657-4 __-- ___-- ___--__________- 16South Dakota v. Trinity Gold Min-

ing Co., 34 L. D., 485 --___ 462South Dakota Mining Co. v. Afc-

Donald, 30 LI. D., 357 _ ---------- 26Spalding v. Hake, 34 L. D., 541___ 80Sparks, Minnie H., 36 L. D., 234_. 537Spratt v. Spratt, 4 Pet., 393 8-- 205State of California et al., 41 L. D.,

592 ____ _128State of Colorado, 6 L. D., 412---- 462

X


Page.

State of Illinois v. Illinois CentralR. R. Co., 33 Fed., 730_________ 446

State of Ohio, 10 L. D., 394._ 585, 587, 5S9State of Oregon, 32 L. D., 664___ 124State of Oregon v. Hitchcock, 202

U. S., 60-------___--_____-_- 201State of South Dakota. v. Delicate,

34 L. D., 717- - ____________ 462State of South Dakota v. Riley, 34

L. D., 657___--___----_-_-___- 416State of South Dakota v. Trinity

Gold Mining Co., 34 L. D., 4853. 462State of Utah, 32 L. D., 117------ 462State of Utah, 38 L. D., 2453__-_ 33State of Washington tv. Geisler, 41

L. D., 621 --146State of Washington v. Kuhn, 24

L. D., 12 ____-- __-- __-__- 416Stirling, Lillie E., 39 L. D., 346___- 234Storaasli, Saavi, 40 L. D., 193 __ 141Stuart v. Laird, 1 Cranch, 299____- 419Sullivan v. Burnett, 105 U. S., 334_ 205Sullivan v. Iron Silver Mining Co.,

143 U. S., 431 _____ L - 24Sutter et al. v. Heckman et at., 1

Alaska, 81 ____--_________-_- 447Swanson v. Simmons, 16 L. D., 44__ 81Sweeney, Cynthia Martha, 40 L. D.,

148 __ ------ 523

Taylor v. Yates, 8 L. D., 279 - 383, 585,587, 589

Thorniley, George, 13 L. D., 177- 540Thorpe et al. v. State of Idaho, 43

L. D., 16s8 -________-___-_-__ 448Todd v. State of Washington, 24

L. D., 106- -________--____-____ 416Toole, Michael, 24 L. D., 462 __ 379Tracy v. Johnson, 41 L. D., 124_- 369, 374Turner v. Sawyer, 150 U. S., 578__ 299

Underwood, John H., 31 L. 0., 2538United Peoria and Mliamies, 12 L.

D., 168 -- ___3-----------___ 521,United States Mining Co. v. Wall.,

39 L. D,, 546 ____- ____-_United States v. Arredondo, 6 Pet.,

691 _ I ---------------United States v. Budd, 144 U. S.,

1 54 --------------------------United States v. George, 228 U. S.,

14 _ -_ --------United States v. Healey, 160 U. S.,

136 ----United States v. Johnston, 124 U. S.

236 _----

245

529

176

536

131

220

355

589

r :1age.

United States v. Lee Wilson & Co.,214 Fed., 630----------------- 211

United States v. Midwest Oil Co. etal., 236 U. S., 459--- 419, 585, 587, 589

United States v. Minor, 114 U. S.,233 --------------------------201

United States v. Northern PacificRy. Co., 177 U. S., 43.53 _ _ 218

United States v. Northern PacificRy. Co., 204 Fed., 4853 -______ 79

Upham, Lottie M., 42 L. D., 89 __ 142Utah, State of, 32 L. D., 117_____-_ 462Utah, State of, 38 L. D., 2453____ 33

Ventura Coast Oil Co., 42 L. D., 453 342Vinson, Virinda, 39 L. D., 449 --- 584, 586Virginia Lode, 7 L. D., 459-------- 462Vradenburg's Heirs et al. v. Orr et

al., 25 L. D., 533 3 __-_-___-_-162, 169

Walker, Hattie E., 15 L. D., 377 __ 149Walker, Thomas B., 39 L. D., 426_- 497Ward, J. T., 32 L. D., 573 _-___- 337Warren, Floyd W., 43 L. D., 181-- 355.Warren et al. v. State of Colorado,

14 L. D., 681---------------- 462Washington, State of, v.: Geisler, 41

L. D., 621 __ ________ _ 146Washington, State of, v. Kuhn, 24

L. D., 12 __ 416Watkins, Jerry, 17 L. D., 148 22Weber v. Harbor Commissioners, 18

Wall., 57_--------------------- 444West v. Hitchcock, 205 U. B., 80_ 5335White, Martha B., 23 L. D., 52---- 150Whitehurst, Julian D., 32 L. D.,

356 6 ----------------- 3------- 503Whitford v. Clark Co., 119 U. .S.,522 ______-- ______-- _______- 42Williams v. United States, 138 U.

S., 514___________-*_-----_____ 201W'illiamson v. United States, 207

U. S., 425____ _ _______-__ 220, 517Williston Land Co., 39 L. D., 2____ 12Woodbury v. United States, 170

Fed., 302_ ------------------ 537Woodhouse, Albert L., 41 L. D., 145 485Wright v. Seymour, 69 Cal., 122__ 444Wright-Blodgett Co. v. United

States, 236 U. S., 397_________- 498Wunderlich v. Selvig, 40 L. D., 355 142Wunsch, George F., 43 L. D., 551.. 412

Yates v. Milwaukee, 10 Wall., 497__ 447

xi

XII

TABLE OF OVERRULED AND MODIFIED CASES.

[Volumes 1 to 44, inclusive.]

[Cases marked with a star ( ) are now authority.]

Alaska Commercial Company (39 L. D.,597) ; vacated,.41 L. D., 75.

Alaska Copper Company (32 L. D., 128)overruled in part, 37 L. D., 674; 42L. D., 255.

Aldrich v. Anderson (2 L. D., 71); over-ruled, 15 L. D., 201.

Alheit, Rosa (40 L. D., 145) ; overruled,43 L. D., 342.

Allen, Sarah E. (40- L. D., 586) ; modified,44 L. D., 331.

Americus v. Hall (29 L. D., 677) ; va-cated, 30 L. D., 388.

*Anmidon v. Hegdale (39 L. D., 131) ; over-ruled, 40 L. D., 259. (See 42 L. D.,577.)

*Anderson, Andrew, et al. (1 L. D., 1);overruled, 34 L. D., 606. (See 36 L. D.,14,)

Anderson v. Tannehill et at. (10 L. D.,388) ; overruled, 18 L. D., 586.

Ashton, Fred W. (31 L. D., 356) ; over-ruled, 42 L. D., 215.

Atlantic and Pacific R. R. Co. (5 L. D.,269) ; overruled, 27 L. D., 241.

*Auerbach, Samuel 15., et al. (29 L. D.,208) ; overruled, 36 L. D., 36. (See 37L. D., 715.)

Baca Float No. 5 (5 L. D., 705; 12 L. D.,676; 13 L. D., 624); vacated, 29 L. D.,44.

Bailey, John W., et at. (3 L. D., 386)modified, 5 L. D., 513.

*Baker v. Hurst (7 L. D., 457) ; overruled,8 L. D., 110. (See 9 L. D., 360.)

Barbour v. Wilson et al. (23 L. D., 462)vacated, 28 L. D., 62.

Barbut, James (9 L. D., 514) ; overruled,29 L. D., 698.

Barlow, S. L. M. (5 L. D., 695); modified,6 L. D., 648.

Bartch v. Kenney (3 L. D., 437); modified,6 L. D., 217.

Beery v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co. ft.(41 L. D., 121) ; overruled, 43 L. D., 536.

Bennett, Peter W. (6 L. D., 672) ; over-ruled, 29 L. D,, 565.

Birkholz, John (27 L. D., 59) ; overruled,43 L. D., 221.

Bivins v. Shelley (2 L. D., 282); modified,4 L. D., 583.

*Black, L; C. (3 L. D., 101); overruled, 34L. D., 606. (See 36 L. D., 14.)

Blenkner v. Sloggy (2 L. D., 267) ; modi-fied, 6 L. D., 217.

Boeschen, Conrad William (41 L. D., 309)vacated, 42 L. D., 244.

Bosch, Gottlieb (8 L. D., 45) ; overruled,13 L. DI, 42.

Box v. Ulstein (3 L. D., 143) ; modified, 6L. D., 217.

Boyle, William (38 L. D., 603); over-ruled, 44 L. D., 331.

Bradford, J. L. (31 L. D., 132) ; overruled,35 L. D., 399.

Bradstreet et al. v. Rehm (21 L. D., 30).;reversed, Hi., 544.

Brady v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co. (5L. D., 407 and 658) ; overruled, 20 L. D.,259.

Braucht et af. v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.et at. (435 L. D., 536) ; modified, 44 L.D., 225.

Brick Pomeroy Mill Site (34 L. D., 320)overruled, 37 L. D., 674.

5Brown, Joseph T. (21 L. D., 47) ; over-

ruled, 31 L. D., 222. (See 35 L. D.,399.)

Brown v. Cagle (30 L. D., 8); vacated, 30L. D., 148.

Browning, John W. (42 L. D., 1); over-ruled, 43 L. D., 342.

Bundy v. Livingston (1 L. D., 152) over-ruled, 6 L. D., 284.

Burdick, Charles W. (34 L. D., 345)modified, 42 L. D., 472.

Burgess, Allen L. (24 L. D., 11) * over-ruled, 42 L. D., 321.

Burkholder v. Skagen (4 L. D., 166); over-ruled, 9 L. D., 153.

Buttery v. Sprout (2 L. D., 293), over-ruled, 5 L. D., 591.

Cagle v. Mendenhall (20 L. D., 447); over-ruled, 23 L. D., 533.

Cain et al. v. Addenda Mining Co. (24L. D., 18) ; vacated, 29 L. D., 62.

California and Oregon Land Co. (21 L. D.,344) ; overruled, 26 L. D., 453.

California, State of (14 L. D., 253) ; va-cated, 23 L. D., 230.

California, State of (15 L. D., 10) ; over-ruled, 23 L. D., 423.

California, State of (19 L. D., 585) ; va-cated, 28 L. D., 57.

California, State of (22 L. D., 428) ; over-ruled, 32 L. D., 34.

California, State of, v. Moccettinu (19L. D., 359) ; overruled, 31 L. D., 335.

California, State of, v. Pierce (0 C. L. O.,118) ; modified, 2 IC. D., 854.

California, State of, v. Smith (5 L. D.,543) ; overruled, 18 L. D., 343.

Call v. Swaim (3 L. D., 46) ; overruled, 18L. D., 373.

Cameron Lode (13 L. D., 369) ; overruled,25 L. D., 518.

Camplan v. Northern Pacific R. R. Co. (28L. D., 118) ; overruled, 20 L. D., 550.

TABLE OFe OVERRULED

Case v. Church (17 L. D., 578) ; overruled,26 L. D., 453.

Castello v. Bonnie (20 L. D., 811) ; over-ruled, 22 L. D., 174.

Cate v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co. -(41 L. D., -816) ; overruled, 48 L. D., 60.

Cawood v. Dumas (22 L. D., 585) ; va-cated, 25 L. D., 526.

Central Pacific R. R. Co. v. Orr (2 L. D.,525) ; overruled, 11 L. D., 445.

Chappell v. Clark (27 L. D., 334); modi-fied, 27 L. D., 532.

Chicago Placer Mining Claim (34 L. D., 9);overruled, 42 L. D., 453.

Childress et at. v. Smith (15 L. D., 89)overruled, 26 L. D., 453.

Christofferson, Peter (3 L. D., 329); modi-fied, 6 L. D., 284, 624.

Claffin v. Thompson (28 L. D., 279); over-ruled, 29 L. D., 693.

Claney v. Ragland (88 L. D., 550); see 43L. D., 486.

Cochran v. Dwyer (9 L. D., 478); see 39L. D., 1962, 225.

Colorado, State of (7 L. D., 490); over-ruled, 9 L. D., 408.

Cook, Thomas C. (10 L. D., 324); see 39L. D., 162, 225.

Cooke v. Villa (17 L. D., 210); vacated,19 L. D., 442.

Cooper, John W. (15 L. D., 285) ; over-ruled, 25 L. D., 113.

Copper Bullion and Morning Star LodeMining Claims (35 L. D., 27) ; see 39L. D., 574.

Corlis v. Northern Pacific R. R. Co. (23L. D., 265), vacated, 26 L. D., 652.

Cornell v. Chilton (1 L. D., 153) ; over-ruled, 6 L. D., 483.

Cowles v. Huff (24 L. D., 81); modified,28 L. D., 515.

Cox, Allen H. (80 L. D., 90, 468); vacated,31 L. D., 114.

Crowston v. Seal (5 L. D., 213) ; overruled,18 L. D., 586.

Culligan v. State of Minnesota (34 L. D.,22) ; modified, 34 L. D., 151.

Cunningham, John (32 L. D., 207) ; modi-fied, 82 L. D., 456.

Dakota Central R. R. Co. v. Downey (8L. D., 115) ; modified, 20 L. D., 131.

Dempsey, Charles H. (42 L. D., 215)modified, 43 L. D., 300.

Dennison & Willits (11 C. L. 0., 261);overruled, 26 L. D., 123.

Devoe, Lizzie A. (5 L. D., 4); modified, 5L. D., 429.

Dickey, Ella I. (22 L..D., 851) ; overruled,32 L. D., 331.

Douglas and Other Lodes (34 L. D., 556)modified, 43 L. D., 128.

Dowman v. Moss (19 L. D., 526) ; over-ruled, 25 L. D., 82.

Dudymott v. Kansas Pacific B. R. Co. (5 C.L. O., 69) ; overruled, 1 L. D., 345.

AND MODIFIED CASES. XIII

Dunphy, Elijah M. (8,L. D., 102); over-ruled, 36 L. D., 561.

Dyche v. Beleele (24 L. D., 494); modified,43 L. D., 56.

Dysart, Francis J. (23 L. D., 282) ; modi-fied, 25 L. D., 188.

East Tintic Consolidated Mining Co. (41L. D., 255) ;,vacated, 43 L. D., 80.

Easton, Francis E. (27 L. D., 600); over-ruled, 30 L. D., 355.

El Paso Brick Co. (37 L. D., 155) over-ruled, as far as in conflict, 40 L. D., 199.

*Elliott v. Ryan (7 L. D., 322) ; overruled,8 L. D., 110. (See 9 L. D., 360.)

Emblen v. Weed (16 L. D., 28) ; overruled,17 L. D., 220,

Epley v. Trick (8 L. D., 110); overruled,9 L. D., 360.

Erhardt, Finsans (36 L. D., 154); over-ruled, 38 L. D., 406.

'Esping v. Johnson (37 L. D., 709) over-ruled, 41 L. D., 289.

Ewing v. Rickard (1 L. D., 146); over-ruled, 6 L. D., 483.

Falconer v. Price (19 L. D., 167); over-ruled, 24 L. D., 264.

Fargo No. 2 Lode Claims (37 L. D., 404)modified, 43 L. D., 128.

Febes, James H. (37 L. D., 210); over-ruled, 43 L. D., 183.

Ferrell et 0. v. loge et at. (18 L. D., 81)overruled, 25 L. D., 351.

Fette v. Christiansen (29 L. D., 710)overruled, 34 L. D., 167.

Fish, Mary (10 L. D., 606) ; modified, 13L. D., 511.

Fisher v. Heirs of Rule (42 1,. D., 62, 64)vacated, 43 L. D., 217.

Fitch v. Sioux City and Pacific P. R. Co.(216 L. and R., 184) ; overruled, 17 L.D., 43.

Fleming v. Bowe (13 L. D., 78) ; overruled,23 L. D., 175.

Florida Mesa Ditch Co. (14 L. D., 265)overruled, 27 L. D., 421.

Florida Railway and Navigation Co. v.Miller (3 L. D., 324) ; modified,. 6 L. D.,716; overruled, 9 L. D., 237.

Florida, State of (17 L. D., 355) ; reversed,19 L. D., 76.

Forgeot, Margaret (7 L. D., 280); over-ruled, 10 L. D., 629.

Fort Boise Hay Reservation (6 L. D., 16)overruled, 27 L. D., 505.

Freeman, Flossie (40 L. D., 106); over-ruled, 41 L. D., 63.

Freeman v. Texas Pacific R. R. Co. (2L. D., 550) ; overruled, 7 L. D;, 18.

Galliher, Mlarie (8 C. L. 0., 57); overruled,1 IL D., 17.

Garlis v. Borin (21 L. D., 542) ; see 39L. D., 162, 225.

TABLE] OF OVERRULED AND MODIFIED OASES.

Garrett, Joshua (2 C. L. O., 1005); over-,ruled, 5 L. D., 158.

Garvey v. Tuiska (41 L. D., 510); modi-fied, 43 L. D., 229. :

Gates v. California and Oregon R. R. Co.(5 C. L. O., 150) ; overruled, 1 L. D.,336.

Gauger, Henry (10 L. D., 221) ; overruled,24 L. D., 81.

Gohrman v. Ford (8 C. L. O., 6); over-ruled, 4 L. D., 580.

Golden Chief "A" Placer Claim (35 L. D.,557) ; modified, 37 L. D., 250.

Goldstein v. Juneau Townsite (23 L. D.,417) ; vacated, 31 L. D., 8S.

Gotebo Townsite v. Jones (35 L. D., 18)modified, 37 L. D., 560.

Gowdy v. Connell (27 L. D., 56) ; vacated,28 L. D., 240.

Gowdy v. Gilbert (19 L. D., 17) ; overruled,26. L. D., 453.

Gowdy et al. v. Kismet Gold Mining Co,(22 L. D., 624) ; modified, 24 L. D., 191.

Grampian Lode (1 L. D., 544) overruled,25 L. D., 495.

Gregg et al. v. State of Colorado (15 L. D.,151) ; modified, 30 L. D., 310.

Grinnell v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co. (22L. D., 438) ; vacated, 23 L. D., 489.

Ground Hog Lode. v. Parole and MorningStar Lodes (8 L. D., 430) ; overruled,34 L. D., 568.

Guidney, Alcide (8 C. L. O., 157) ; over-ruled, 40 L. D., 399.

Gulf and Ship Island R. R. Co. (16 L. D.,236); modified, 19 L. D., 534.

Halvorson, Halvor K. (39 L. D., 456) ; over-ruled, 41 L. D., 505.

Hansbrough, Henry C. (5 L. D., 155)overruled, 29 L. D., 59.

Hardee, D. C. (7 L. D., 1); overruled, 29L. D., 698.

Hardee v. United States 8 L. D., 391; 16L. D., 499) ; overruled, 29 L. D., 698.

Hardin, James A. (10 L. D., 313) ; re-voked, 14 L. D., 233.

Harris, James G. (28 L. D., 90); over-ruled, 39 L. D., 93.

Harrison, Luther (4 L. D., 179); over-ruled, 17 L. D., 216. ,

Harrison, W. R. (19 L. D., 299); over-ruled, 33 L. D., 539.

Hastings and Dakota, Ry. Co. v. Christen-son et al.. (22 L. D., 257) ; overruled, 28L. D., 572.

Hayden v. Jamison (24 L. D., 403) ; va-cated, 26 L. D., 373.

Heilman v. Syverson (15 L. D., 184) ; over-ruled, 23 L. D., 119.

Heinzman et al. v. Letroadec's Heirs et al.(28 L. D., 497) ; overruled, 38 L. D., 253.

Heirs of Philip Mulnix 33 D. D., 331)overruled, 43 L. D., 532.

Heirs of Stevenson v. Cunningham (32L. D., 630) ; overruled, 41 L. D., 119.

Relmer, Inkerman (34 L. D., 341) ; modi-fied, 42 L. D., 472.

Henderson, John W. (40 L. D., 518) ; va-cated, 43 L. D., 106.

Hennig, Nellie J. (38 L. D., 443, 445)recalled and vacated, 39 L. D., 211.

Herman v. Chase et al. (37 L. D., 590)overruled, 43 L. D., 246.

Herrick, Wallace H. (24 L. D., 23); over-ruled, 25 L. D., 113.

Hickey, M. A., et al. (3 L. D., 83); modi-fied, 5 L. D., 256.

Hindman, Ada I. (42 L. D., 327); vacatedin part, 43 L. D., 191.

Hoglund, Svan (42 L. D., 405); vacated,43 L. D., 538.

Holden, Thomas A. (16 L. D., .493)overruled, 29 L. D., 166.

Holland, G. W. (6 L. D., 20) ; overruled,6 L. D., 639; 12 L. D., 436.

Hon v. Martinas (41 L. D., 119) ; modi-fied, 43 L. D., 197.

Hooper, Henry (6 L. D., 624) ; modified, 9U. D., 86, 284.

Howard, Thomas (3 L. D., 409) ; see 39L. D., 162, 225. -

Howard v. Northern Pacific R. R. Co. (23L. D., 6); overruled, 28 L. D., 126.

Howell, John H, (24 L. D., 35) ; overruled,28 L. D., 204.

Howell, L. C. (39 L. D., 92) ; see 39 L. D.,411.

Hull et al. v. Ingle (24 L. D., 214) ; over-ruled, 30 L. D., 258.

Huls, Clara (9 L. D., 401) ; modified, 21L. D., 377.

Hyde, F. A., et aT. (27 L. D., 472); va-cated, 28 L. D., 284. (See 43 L. D.,381.)

Hyde et al. v. Warren et al. (14 L. D.,576) ; see 19 L. D., 64.

Ingram, John D. (37 L. D., 475) ; see 43L. D., 544.

Inman v. Northern Pacific R. R. Co. (24L. D., 318) ; overruled, 28 L. D., 95.

Iowa Ralroad Land Company (23 L. D.,79; 24 L. D., 125) ; vacated, 29 L. D.,79.

Jacks v. Belard ef ai. (29 L. D., 369); va-cated, 30 L. D., 345.

Jackson Oil Co. v. Southern Pacific R. R.Co. (40 L. D., 528) ; overruled, 42 L. D.,317.

Johnson v. South Dakota (17 L. D., 411)overruled, 41 L. D., 22.

Jones, James A. (3 L. D., 176) ; overruled,8 L. D., 448.

Jones v. Kennett (6 L. D., 688) ; over-ruled, 14 L. D., 429.

Kaekmann, Peter (1 L. D., 86) ; overruled,16 L. D., 464.

x1v


Kemper v. St. Paul and Pacific R. R. Co.(2 C. L. L., 805) ; overruled, 18 L. D.,101.

King v. Eastern Oregon Land Co. (23 L. D.,579) ; modified, 30 L. D., 19.

Kinsinger v: Peck (11 L. D., 202) ; see 39L. D,, 162, 225.

Kiser v. Keech- (7 L. D., 25); overruled,23 L. D., 119.

Knight, Albert B., et al. (30 L. D., 227)overruled, 31 L. D., 64.

Knight v. Heirs of Knight (39 L. D., 362,491; 40 L. D., 461) ; overruled, 43 L. D.,242.

Kniskern v. Hastings and Dakota Ry. Co.(6 C. L. O., 50) ; overruled, 1 L. D., 362.

Kolberg, Peter F. (37 L. D., 453); over-ruled, 43 L. D., 181.

KTrigbaum, James T. (12 L. D., 617); over-ruled, 26 L. D., 448.

Lackawanna Placer Claim (36 L. D., 36)overruled, 37 L. D., 715.

Lamb v. Ullery (10 L. D., 528); overruled,32 L. D., 331.

Largent, Edward B., et al. (13 L. D., 397)overruled, 42 L. .D., 321.

Larson, Syvert (40 L. D., 69) ; overruled,43 L. D., 242.

Lasselle v. Missouri, Kansas and Texas Ry.Co. (3 C. L. O., 10) ; overruled, 14 L. D.,278.

Las Vegas Grant (13 L. D., 646; 15 L. D.,58) ; revoked, 27 L. D., 683.

Laughlin, Allen (31 L. D., 256) ; overruled,41 L. D., 361.

Laughlin v. Martin (18 L. D., 112); modi-fied, 21 L. D., 40.

Lemmons, Lawson H. (19 L. D., 37); over-ruled, 26 L. D., 389.

Leonard, Sarah (1 L. D., 41); overruled,16 L. D., 464.

Lindberg, Anna C. (3 L. D., 95) ; modified,4- L. D., 299.

Linderman v. Wait (6. L. D., 689) ; over-ruled, 13 L. D., 459.

*JInhart v. Santa Fe Pacific R. R. Co. (36L. D., 41) ; overruled, 41 L. D., 284.See 43 L. D., 536.

Little Pet Lode (4 L. D., 17); overruled,25 L. D., 550.

Lock Lode (6 L. D., 105) ; overruled, 26L. D., 123.

Lockwood, Francis A. (20 L. D., 361)modified, 21 L. D., 200.

Lonergan v. Shockley (33 L. D., 238)overruled, 34 L. D., 314; 36 L. D., 199.

Louisiana, State of (S L. D., 126) ; modi-fied, 9 L. D., 157.

Louisiana, State of (24 L. D., 231); va-cated, 26 L. D., 5.

Lucy B. Hussey Lode (5 L. D., 93); over-ruled, 25 L, D1, 495.

Luton, James W. (34 L. D., 468); over-ruled, 35 L. D., 102.

46310

-VOL 44-15 II

Lyman, Mary O. (24 L. D., 493); overruled,43 L. D., 221.

Lynch, Patrick (7 L. D., 33); overruled,13 L. D., 713.

Madigan, Thomas (S L. D., 188); over-ruled, 27 L. D., 448.

Maginnis, Charles P. (31 L. D., 222)overruled, 35 L. D., 399.

Maginnis, John S. (32 L. D., 14); modi-fied, 42 L. D., 472.

Maher, John M. (34 L. D., 342) ; modified,42 L. D., 472.

Mahoney, Timothy (41 L. D., 129) ; over-ruled, 42 L.- D., 313.

Makemson v. Snider's Heirs (22 L. D.,511) ; overruled, 32 L. D., 650.

Malone Land and Water Co. (41 LD. D.,138) ;,overruled in part, 43 L. D., 110.

Maple, Frank (37 L. D., 107) ; overruled,43 L. D., 181.

Martin v. Patrick (41 L. D., 284) ; over-ruled, 43 L. D., 536.

Mason v. Cromwell (24 -L. D., 248) ; va-cated, 26 L. D., 369.

Masten, E. C. (22 L. D., 337); overruled,25 L. D., 111.

Mather et al. v. HIackley's Heirs (15 L. D.,487) ; vacated, 19 L. D., 48.

Maughan, George W. (1 L. D., 25) ; over-ruled, 7 L. D., 94.

McCalla v. Acker (29 L. D., 203) ; vacated,30 L. D., 277.

McCornick, William S. (41 L. D., 661,666) ; vacated, 43 L. D., 429. I

McCraney v. Heirs of Hayes (33 IL. D.,21) ; overruled, 41 L. D., 119.

McDonald, Roy, et al. (34 T.. D., 21) ; over-ruled, 37 L. D., 285.

*McDonogh School Fund (11 L. D., 378)overruled, 30 L. D., 616. (See 35 L. D.,399.)

McFadden et al. v. Mountain View Miningand Milling Co. (26 L. D., 530) ; vacated,27 L. D., 358.

McGee, Edward D. (17 L. D., 285).; over-ruled, 29 L. D., 166.

McGraun, Owen (5 L. D., 10); overruled,24 L. D., 502.

McGregor, Carl (37 L. D., 693); overruled,38 L. D., 148.

McKernan v. Bailey (16 L. D., 368), over-ruled, 17 L. D., 494.

*McKittrick Oil Co. v. Southern PacificR. R. Co. (37 L. D., 243) ; overruled, 40L. D,, 528. (See 42 L. D., 317.)

McNamara et al. v. State of California (17L. D., 296) ; overruled, 22 L. D., 666.

McPeek v. Sullivan et al. (25 L. D., 281);overruled, 36 L. D., 26.

Meeboer v. Heirs of Schut (35 L. D., 335)overruled, 41 L. D., 119.

Mercer v. Buford Townsite (35 L. D., 119)overruled, 35 L. D., 649.

Meyer, Peter (6 IL. D., 639) ; modified, 12L. D., 436.

-V


Meyer v. Brown (15 L. D., 307) ; see 39L. D., 162, 225.

Miller, Edwin J. (35 L. D., 411) ; overruled,43 L. D., 181.

Miller v. Sebastian (19 L. D., 288); over-ruled, 26 L. D., 448.

Milner and North Side R. R. Co. (36 L. D.,488) ; overruled, 40 L. D., 187.

Milton et al. v. Lamb (22 L. D., 339) ; over-ruled, 25 L. D., 550.

Milwaukee, Lake Shore and Western Ry.Co. (12 L. D., 79) ; overruled, 29 L. D.,112.

Miner v. Mariott et al. (2 L. D., 709);modified, 28 L. D., 224.

*Mitchell v. Brown (3 L. D., 65); over-ruled 41 L. D., 396. (See 43 L. D., 520.)

Monitor Lode (18 L. D., 358) ; overruled,25 L. D., 495.

Moore, Charles H. (16 L. D., 204); over-ruled, 27 L. D., 482.

Morgan v. Craig (10 C. L. O., 234); over-ruled, 5 L. D., 303.

Morgan v. Rowland (37 L. D., 90); over-ruled, 37 L. D., 618.

Moritz v. Hinz (36L. D.; 450) ; vacated, 37L. D., 382.

Morrison, Charles S. (36 L. D., 126) ; modi-fied, 36 L. D., 319.

Morrow et al. v. State of Oregon et al. (32L. D., 54) ; modified, 33 L. D., 101.

Moses, Zelmer R. (36 L. D., 473); over-ruled, 44 L. D., 570.

Mountain Chief Nos. 8 and 9 Lode Claims(36 L. D., 100) ; overruled in part, 36L. D., 551.

Mt. Whitney Military Reservation (40L. D., 315) ; see 43 L. D., 33.

Muller, Esberne K. (39 L. D., 72); modi-fied, 39 L. D., 360.

Mulnix, Philip, Heirs of (33 L. D., 331)overruled, 43 L. D., 532.

Nebraska, State of (18 L. D., 124); over-ruled, 28 L. D., 358.

Nebraska, State of, v. Dorrington (2 C. L.L., 647); overruled, 26 L. D., 123.

Neilsen v. Central Pacific R. R. Co. et al.(26 L. D., 252) ; modified, 30 L. D., 216.

Newbanks v. Thompson (22 L. D., 490)overruled, 29 L. D., 108.

Newlon, Robert C (41 L. D., 421); over-ruled, 43 L. D., 364.

Newton, Walter (22 L. D., 322) ; modified,25 L. D., 188.

New York Lode and Millsite (5 L. D., 513)overruled, 27 L. D., 373.

*NickQ, John R. (9 L. D., 388) ; over-ruled, 41 L, D., 129. ( See 42 L. D., 313.)

Northern Pacific R. R. Co. (20 L. D., 191);modified, 22 L. D., 224; overruled, 29L. D., 550.

Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Bowman (7L. D., 238); modified, 18 L. D., 224.

Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Burns (0L. D., 21); overruled, 20 L. D., 191.

Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Loomis (21L. D., 395) ; overruled 27 L. D., 464.

Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Marshall et al.(17 L. D., 545) ; overruled, 28 L. D., 174.

Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Miller (7L. D., 100) ; overruled, 16 L. D., 229.

Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Sherwood (28L. D., 126) ; overruled, 29 L. D., 550.

Northern.Pacific R. R. Co. v. Symons (22L. D., 686); overruled, 28 L. D., 95.

Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Urquhart (8L. D., 365) ; overruled, 28 L. D., 126.

Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Yantis (8L. D., 58) ; overruled, 12 L. D., 127.

Nyman v. St. Paul, Minneapolis and Maui-toba Ry. Co. (5 L. D., 396); overruled,6 L. D., 750.

O'Donnell, Thomas J. (28 L. D., 214)overruled, 35 L. D., 411.

Olson v. Traver et al. (26 L. D., 350, 628)overruled, 29 L. D., 480; 30 L. D., 382.

Opinion A. A. G. (35 L. D., 277) ; vacated,36 L. D., 342.

Oregon Central Military Wagon Road Co. v.Hart (I7 L. D., 480) ; overruled, 18L. D., 543.

Owens et al. v. State of California (22L. D., 369) ; overruled, 38 L. D., 253.

Pacific Slope Lode (12 L. D., 686); over-ruled, 25 L. D., 518.

Papini v. Alderson (1 B. L. P., 91); modi-fied, 5 L. D., 256.

Patterson, Charles E. (3 L. D., 260); modi-fied, 6 L. D., 284, 624.

Paul Jones Lode (28 L. D., 129) ; modified,31 L. D., 359.

Paul v. Wiseman (21 L. D., 12) ; over-ruled, 27 L: D., 522.

Pecos Irrigation and Improvement Co. (15L. D., 470) ; overruled, 18 L. D., 168,268.

Pennock, Belle L. (42 L. D., 315) ; vacated,43 L. D., 66.

Phelps, W. L. (8 C. L. O., 139); overruled,2 L. D., 854.

Phillips, Alonzo (2 L. D., 321); overruled,15 L. D., 424.

Phillips v. Breazeale's Heirs (19 L. D.,573) ; overruled, 39 L. D., 93.

Pieper, Agnes C. (35 L. D., 459) ; over-ruled, 43 L. D., 374.

Pietkiewicz et at v. Richmond (29 L. D.,195) ; overruled, 37 L. D., 145.

Pikes Peak Lode (14 L. D., 47); overruled,20 L. D., 204.

Popple, James (12 L. D., 433); overruled,13 L. D., 588.

Powell, D. C. (6 L. D., 302); modified, 15L. D., 477.

Premo, George (9 L. D., 70); see 89 L. D.,162, 225.

Pringle, Wesley (13 L. D., 519) overruled,29 L. D., 599,

XVI


Provensal, Victor HI. (80 L. D., 616) over-ruled, 835 L. D., 399.

Prue, widow of Emanuel (6 L. D., 436)vacated, 33 L. D., 409.

Puyallup Allotments (20 L. D., 157) modi.fied, 29 L. D., 628.

Rancho Alisal (1 L. D., 173); overruled, 5L. D., 820.

Rankin, James D., et at. (7 L. D., 411)overruled, 35 L. D., 32.

Rankin, John M. (20 L. D., 272) ; reversed,21 L. D., 404.

*Reed v. Buffington (7 L. D., 154) ; over-ruled, 8 L. D., 110. (See 9 L. D., 860.)

Regione v. Rosseler (40 L. D., 93) ; va-cated, 40 L. D., 420.

Rialto No. 2 Placer Afining Claim (34L. D., 44) ; overruled, 87 L. D., 250.

Rico Townsite (1 L. D., 556) ; modified, 5L. D., 256. -

Roberts v. Oregon Central Military RoadCo. (19 L. D., 591) ; overruled, 31 L. D.,174.

Robinson, Stella G. (12 L. D., 443); over-ruled, 13 L. D., 1.

Rogers, Horace B. (10 L.- D., 29); over-ruled, 14 L. 'D., 321.

Rogers v. Atlantic and Pacific R. R. Co. (6L. D., 565) ; overruled, 8 L. D., 165.

*Rogers v. Lukens (6 L. D., 111) ; over-ruled, 8 L. D., 110. (See 9 L. D., 360.)

Rough Rider and Other Lode Mining Claims(41 L. D., 242, 255); vacated, 42 L. D.,584.:

Salsberry, Carroll (17 L. D., 170); over-ruled, 39 L. D., 93.

Santa Fe Pacific R. R. Co. v. Peterson (89L. D., 442) ; overruled, 41 L. D., 383.

Satisfaction Extension Mill Site (14 L. D.,173) ; see Alaska Copper Co., 32 L. D.,128.

Sayles, Henry P (2 L. D., 88); modified,6 L. D., 797. '

Schweitzer v. Hillard (19 L. D., 294)overruled, 26 L. D., 639.

Serrano v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co. (6C. L. O., 93) ; overruled, 1 L. D., 380.

Shanley v. Moran (1 L. D., 162); over-ruled, 15 L. D., 424.

Shineberger, Joseph (S L. D., 231); over-ruled, 9 L. D., 202.

Simpson, Lawrence it. (35 L. D., 399,609) ; modified, 36 L. D., 205.

Sipehen v. Ross (1 L. D., 684); modified,4 L. D., 152.

Smead v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co. (21L. D., 432) ; vacated, 29 L. D., 135.

Snook, Noah A., et at. (41 L. D., 428)overruled, 43 L. D., 364.

Sorli v. Berg (40 L. D., 259); overruled,42 L. D., 557.

Southern Pacific R. R. Co. (15 L. D., 460)reversed, 18 L. D., 275.

Southern Pacific R. R.--Co. (28 L. D., 281)recalled, 32 L. D.. 51.

Southern Pacific R. R. Co. (33 L. D., 89)recalled, 33 L. D., 528.

Southern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Burns (31L. D., 272) ; vacated, 87 L. D., 243.

Spaulding v Northern Pacific R. R. Co. (21L. D., 57) ; overruled, 31 L. D., 151.

Spencer, James ((6 L. D., 217) ; modified, 6L. D., 772; 8 L. D., 467.

State of California. (14 L. D., 253) ; va-cated, 23 L. D., 230.

State of California (15 L. D., 10) ; over-ruled, 23 L. D., 423.

State of California (19 L. D., 585) ; va-cated, 28 L. D., 57.

State of California (22 L. D., 428); over-ruled, 32 L. D., 34.

State of California v. Moccettini (19 L. D.,359) ; overruled, 31 L. D., 335.

State of California v. Pierce (3 C. L. O.,118); modified, 2 L. D., 854.

State of California v. Smith (5 L. D.,543) ; overruled, 18 L. D., 843.

State of Colorado (7 L. D., 490) ; over-ruled, 9 L. D., 408.

State of Florida (17 L. D., 355) reversed,19 L. D., 76.

State of Louisiana (8 .L. B., 126); modi-fied, 9 L. D., 157.

State of Louisiana (24 L. D., 231); va-cated, 26 L. D., 5.

State of Nebraska (18 L. D., 124) ; over-ruled, 28 L. D., 358.

State of Nebraska a. Dorrington (2 C. L.L., 647) ; overruled, 26 L. D., 123.

Stewart et at. v. Rees et at. (21 L. D.,446); overruled, 29 L. D., 401.

*St. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Ry.Co. (8 L. D., 255); modified, 13 L. D.,354. (See 32 L. B., 21.)

St Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Hlagen (20L. D., 249) ; overruled, 25 L. D., 86.

St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co. v. Fogelberg (29L. D., 291); vacated, 30 L. D., 191.

Stricker, Lizzie (15 L. D., 74) ; overruled,18 L, D., 283.

Stump, Alfred M., et al. (39 L. D., 437)vacated, 42 L. D,., 566.

Sumner v. Roberts (23 L. D., 201) ; over-ruled, 41 L. D., 173.

Sweeney v. Northern Pacific R. R. Co. (20L. D., 394) ; overruled, 28 L. D., 174.

*Sweet Eri P. (2 C. L. O., 18) ; overruled,41 L. D., 129. (See 42 L. D., 313.)

Sweeten v. Stevenson (3 L. D., 249); over-ruled, 8 L. D., 248.

Taft v. Chapin (14 L. D., 593) ; overruled,17 I, D., 414.

Talkington's heirs v. THempding (2 L. D.,46) ; overruled, 14 L. D., 200.

Tate, Sarah J. (10 L. D., 469); overruled,21 L. D., 211.

xV1I

TABLE OF rCIRCULARS AND INSTRUCTIONS.

Taylor v. Yeats et al. (8 L. D., 279) ; re-versed, 10-L. D., 242.

*Teller, John 0. (26 L. D., 484); overruled,36 L. D., 36. (See 37 L. D., 715.)

Traganza, Mertie C. (40 L. D., 300) ; over-ruled, 42 L. D., 612.

Traugh v. Ernst (2 L. D., 212); overruled,3 L. D., 98.

Tripp v. Dunphy (28 L. D., 14) modified,40 L. D., 128.

Tripp v. Stewart (7 C. L. O., 39) ; modi-fied, 6 L. D., 795.

Tucker v. Florida Ry. & Nav. Co. (19 L. D.,414) ; overruled, 25 L. D., 233.

Tupper v. Schwarz (2 L. D., 623) ;- over-ruled, 6 L. D., 624.

Turner v. Lang (1 C. L. O., 51) ; modified,5 L. D., 256.

Turner v. Cartwright (17 L. D., 414)modified, 21 L. D., 40.

Tyler, Charles (26 L. D., 699); overruled,35 IL. D., 411.

Ulin v. Colby (24 L D., 311); overruled,35 L. D., 549.

Union Pacific R. R. Co. (33 L. D., 89); re-called, 33 II. D., 528.

United States v. Bush (13 L. D., 529)overruled, 18 L. D., 441.

United States v. Dana (18 L. D., 161)modified, 28 L. D., 45.

Vine, James (14 L. D., 527); modified, 14L. 3.,- 622.

Vradenburg's heirs et al. v. Orr et al. (25L. D., 323) ; overruled, 38 L. D., 253.

Wahe, John (41 L. D., 127) ; modified, 41I L. D., 637.

Walker V. Prosser (17 L. D., 85) ; reversed,1,8 L. D., 425.

Walker v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co. (24L. D., 172); overruled, 28 L. D., 174.

Walters, David (15 L. D., 136) ; revoked,24 L. D., 58.

Wasmund v. Northern Pacific R. R. Co., (23L. D., 445) ; vacated, 29 L. D., 224.

Waterhouse, William W. (9 L. D;, 131)overruled, 18 L. D., 586.

Watson, Thomas DL. (4 L. D., 169); modi-fied, 6 L.. D., 71.

Weber, Peter (7 L. D., 476) ; overruled, 9L. D., 150.

Weisenhorn, Ernest (42 L. D., 533); over-ruled, 43 L. D., 395.

Werden v. Schlecht (20 L. D., 523); over-ruled, 24 L. D., 45.

Western Pacific Ry. Co. (40 L. D., 411; 41L,. D., 599) ; overruled, 43 L. D., 410.

Wheaton v. Wallace (24 1. D., 100) ; modi-fied, 34 L. D., 383.

Wickstrom v. Calkins (20 L. D., 459)modified, 21 L. D., 553; overruled, 22L. D., 392.-

Widow of Emanuel Prue (6 L. D., 436)vacated, 33 L. D., 409.

Wiley, George P. (36 L, D., 305) ; modi-fied, 36 L. D., 417.'

Wilkins, Benjamin C. (2 L. D., 129)modified, 6 L. 1D., 797.

Willamette Valley and Cascade MountainWagon Road Co. v. Bruner (22 L. D.,654) ; vacated, 26 L. D., 357. -

Willamette Valley and Cascade MountainWagon Road Co. v. Chapman -(13 L. D.,61); overruled, 20 L. D., 259.

Willingheck, Christian P. (3 L. D., 383)modified, 5 L, D., 409.

Willis, Eliza (22 L. D., 426) ; overruled,26 L. D., 436.

Wilson v. Heirs of Smith (37 L. D., 519);overruled, 41 L. D., 119.

TABLE OF CIRCULARS AND INSTRUCTIONS.

March 2, 1915-Standing Rock lands_March 3, 1915-Right of way___-March 8, 1915-Reclamation ____March 10, 1915-Flathead project ---March 15,1915-Alaska patents_---March 16, 1915-Linlarged homestead

(South Dakota) ---------------March 16, 1915-Enlarged homestead

(Kansas) -- _--___-_________March 19, 1915-Wisconsin Central

settlers __----____--______-_March 20, 1915-Entry of phosphate,

etc., lands______--------------March 20, 1915- Flathead villa

sites _____--_________________March 23, 1915-Standing Rock

lands ----- -------- ------March 31, 1915-Placer iocatibns

phosphate lands ___________April 9, 1915-Paragraphs 48 and

85, Mining Regulations ___-__-_

Page.16.

111222

25

26

31

32

39

43

46

53

Page.April 9, 1915-Attorneys----- 114April 13, 1915-Desert entrymen--- 56April 17, 1915-Enlarged homestead- 66, 68April 24, 1915-Kiowa, etc., lands-- 86April 29, 1915-Reclamation entry-

men_------------------------- 87April 29, 1915-Enlarged homestead_ 88May 3, 1915-Reclamation_______- 89May 22, 1915-Attorneys 1 ____ 120June 1, 1915-Suggestions to home-

steaders_________--______-_____ 91.Tune 1, 1915-Crow lands_________- 121June 18, 1915-Right of way----- 127June 22, 1915-Timber trespass;

damages- -___________ 112June 29, 1915-Alaska -- __--- 441July 2, 1915-Accounts ---- _-- 171July 10, 1915-Amendment --- _--- 181July 14, 1915-Certified copies - ._ 194July 15, 1915-Tripp County lands- 195July 16, 1915-Reclamation -_-___- 202

XVIII

CIRCULARS AND INSTRUCTIONS CITED.

Page.July 24, 1915-Arkansas sunk lands_ 207August 3, 1915-Widow, heirs, dev-

isee-- - -- _ 234isee ----------------- ~ 23August 4, 1915-Copies of records-- 235August 4, 1915-Flathead lands-.-- 240August 6, 1915-Mining circular--- 247August 11, 1915-Right of way____ 335August 23, 1915-Suggestions to -

United States commissioners____- 350August 31, 1915-Telephone lines_ 359September 4, 1915-National forests_ 360September 4, 1915-Notice to heirs_ 364September 21, 1915-Fort Berthold

lands _--_______--__________-452, 455September 23, 1915-Rule 3 of prac-

tice-_----------------------- 365September 23, 1915-Rule 98 of prac-

tice ___________________ 365September 25, 1915-Reclamation__ 377October 2,2, 1915 - Fort Berthold

lands---- ---------- ____-__ _ 382October 25, 1915-Rule 83 of prac-

tice -_--------------------- 366November 10, 1915-Rules of prac-

tice --- _________ 395November 23, 1915-Patents; right

of way _ ___-___-___- 412December 20, 1915-Timber. and

stone ______--_--____--_--___- 504December 20, 1915-Reclamation___ 544December 24, 1915-Military service_ 504December 27, 1915-Allotments____ 505January 13, 1916-National forest

roads, etc ------- ------ --_ - 513January 15, 1916-Records ----- 515January 28, 1916-Copies of records_ 530February 2,1916-Corrected patents_ 546February 19, 1916-Paragraph 19,

timber and stone -- ___ 551

February 19, 1916-Chippewa agri-cultural lands _______-_______

February 26, 1916-Government pro-ceedings _______-_____--___

February 29, 1916-Fort Bertholdcoal lands______-------------

Circulars by number:3 8 9 ----------------------- ---390 . --------3 9 2 ------------------------ -393 - ----------------------

396 -- - - - -_--------_ --_ --__ -__ -__ 398 --------3 9 9 -------------------------4 0 1 - ------------------------4 0 2 - -------- ----------------408__ - ----------------------409 - ----- ----- --- --- ------ --4 1 4 - - -- -- -------------------4 1 6 - ----- ----------- --------4 2 2 -------------------------423_ ____ ------------------425 ____----___--_______4 2 6 -------------------------430 - -- --- -- ---- --- - ---- ---- -433 ---------------------- I-_ -435 -------------------------436 ____--_-- _--_-- _-_-_-_440 ____--_--_----_-___-_-__444 --------- --- --- - -- ------447 -------------------------450 -- ---- -- ------ --- -- -- ----455__________ 456 _ -------------457 -------------------- _I------4 6 0 ------ -- - --- -------------4 6 2 --------- ----------------

CIRCULARS AND INSTRUCTIONS CITED, CONSTRUED, ANDMODIFIED.

1874, June 17 (1 C. L. L., 806),scrip ___--__--__--___--______

1875, June 17 (1 C. L. L., 179), pre-iemption _______-__-_-__----_

1882, December 15 (1 L. D., 649),soldiers' declaratory .__-___-___

1886, December 13 (5 L. D., 279),swamp lands _____- ____------

1889, June 22 (8 L. D., 647), allot-ments -- -------------------

1891, April 22 (12 L. D., 400),school lands -- - _______

1892, September 9 (15 L. D., 287),Indian allotments .------------

1895, April 9 (20 L. D., 304), mili-tary reservations_-------------

1896, November 27 (23 L. D., 458),right of way _____--_-_______

1897, November 30 (25 L. D., 446),mineral classification __________

Page.

548

539

540

389

392

416

521

485

9

74

1901, May 15 (30 L. D., 607), schoollands_ -------------------

1901, August 17 (31 L. D., 72),Chippewa lands ___ -_____

1901, September 6 (31 L. D., 106),Indian lands; commissions __

1902, July 7 (31 L. D., 372), forestlieu selections------------

1904, January 13 (32 L. D., 387),reclamation ______-_______-_

1904, January 13 (32 L. D., 424),Alaska roadway reservation_____

1904, August 9 (33 L. D., 181),school lands ___-__-____.

1905, March 24 (33 L. D., 480),United States commissioners, etc._

1905, May 16 (33 L. D., 558), forestlieu selections -- - ______

1906, November 16 (35 L. D., 305),desert lands ______- __-__

Page.

552

572

575

252631324653566666888791

127171181195207247350360364365366412504505530546572575

Page.

489

555

555

311

582

23

416

350

311

215

:XIx

CIROTTLARS AND INSTRUCTIONS CITED.

I Page.1907, April 12 (35 L. D., 665), coal

lands __----________ 584, 587, 588.1907, April 24 (35 L. D., 381), coal

lands------------------------- 481907, April 30 (35 L. D., 581), school

lands, ________------___--___- 4891907, May 3 (35 L. D., 549), allot-

m ent_ ------------ ---------- _- 5231907, September 30 (36 L. D., 105),

Turtle Mountain Indians ___ 526, 5301908, February 21 (36 L. D., 278,

346), warrants, scrip, etc._______ 3111908, June 6 (36 L. D., 567), right

of way, paragraph 36 ________ 4701908, November 30 (37 L. D., 289),

timber and stone e. _ 7584, 5861909, March 29 (37 L. D., 728),

mining regulations, paragraphs131, 132, 147, 149 ______ _ 176

Paragraphs 49 andi85 ___ 53Paragraph 60 _________ _ 195

1909, April 22 (37 L. D., 655),amendment ------------------176, 186

1909, April 29 (37 L. D., 616), al-lotments______________________- 296

1909, April 30 (37 i. D., 617), scriplocations _---- ____-- ______ 55

1909, June 14 (38 L. D., 41), allot-m ents--------------------___- 505

1909, September 7 (38 L. D., 183),surface rights ___ _____ 34

1909, November 3 (38 L. D., 287),- applications for selections, etc.- 311, 3271910, March 2 (38 LI. D., 468), price

of lands-----------------584, 587, 5891910 May 17 (38 L. D., 594), Chip-

pewa lands __________ _ 5521910, June 23 (39 L. D., 39), State

* selections _____-____-311, 336, 4921910, July 23 (39 L. D., 141), re-

payment, paragraph 12 -------- 5191910, September 8 (39 L. D., 179),

agricultural entries _______ 341910, September 15 (39 L. D., 217),-contest---- __-___-__-------- 239

1910, September 30 (39 L. D., 253),desert lands, paragraph 12_______- 186

1940, November 25 (39 L. D., 374),national forests ____ _ - 361

1911, January 19 (39 L. D., 458),special agents' reports -___ _ 340, 421

1911, March 6 (39 L. D., 544), sur-face rights, etc._ ___ --- __ 325

1912, February 3 (40 L. D., 415),coal lands __---- ___-__-___- 485

1912, February 5 (40 L. D., 418),coal withdrawal _- ______-__ 50

1912, April 2 (40 L. D., 526), en-larged homestead ______ __ 141

1912, May 23 (41 L. D., 30), coallands- -__________ I_ 34

1912, June 14 (41 L. D., 89), coal Ilands ------------------------- 34

1912, October 17 (41 L. D., 333),copies of records__ _-_ - - 530

Page.1912, October 21 (41 L. D., 345), ex-

ploration of withdrawn lands_-_ 3251912, December 6 (41 L. D., 439),

attorneys ________--_--_______- 1201912, December 18 (41 L. D., 443),

isolated tracts __-___-___-584, 587, 5881912, December 30 (41 L. D., 416,

417), coal lands, paragraph 18_ 481, 4821913, January 6 (41 L. D., 454),

right of way __--__-- ______- 3351913, January 23 (41 L. D., 475),

t copies of records ____-_________- 5161913, February 6 (42 L. D., 348),

reclamation, paragraph 37 ___ 220Paragraphs 139-144______-___ 12

1913, March 1 (41 L. D., 532), rightof way, paragraph 3 _________ 475

1913, March 17 (42 L. D., 345), en-larged homestead ------------- 60

1913, April 1 (42 L. D., 71), contest_ 2391913, April 24 (42 L. D., 104), Min-

nesota drainage laws ---- 3801913, September 6 (42 L. D., 348),

reclamation, paragraph 94 -- _ 394, 545Paragraphs 116-120_________- 686Paragraphs 139-144_--------- 12

1913, September 19 (42 L. D., 425),forest homesteads ____________- 30

1913, October 30 (42 Li D., 474),coal lands __-- __-- ____-____- 325

1913, November 1 (42 L. D., 511),three-year homestead------------ 152

1913, November 3 (42 Li. D., 604),Kiowa, etc., lands -____-_-_-- 45

1914, January 2 (43 L. D., 1), sug-gestions to homesteaders __ 91

Paragraph 47 -_____-____-_ 681914, January 2 (43 L. D., 37), tim-

ber and stone, paragraph 19 --- 539, 551Paragraph 20 ____-- --------_ 504

1914, January 31 (43 L. D., 88), al-lotments ________ _ 296

1914, February 19 (43 L. D., 118),forest lieu selections _____ _ 119

1914, March 23 (43 Li D., 203), des-ert lands ----------------------186

1914, May 22 (43 L. D., 254), appli-cations, etc ______ _ _242

1914, June 6 (43 L. D., 272), allot-ments _-__-- _----_ - 296

1914, June 6 (43 L. D., 272), inter-marriage -------------------- 95

1914, June 16 (43 L. D., 275), Ar-kansas sunk lands_-____________ 212

1914, June 17 (43 L. D., 280), FortBerthold lands --____ L 576

1914, November 21 (43 L. D., 459),oil land patents ________ _ 325

1914, December 24 (43 L. D., 476),railroad selections ____________ 311

1915, February 25 (43 L. D., 528),desert lands ______- __-____- 186

1915, March 20 (44 L.. D., 32), phos-phate, etc., lands3 ______ -__- 325

2Xx

Page.1912, October 21 (41 L. D., 345), ex-

ploration of withdrawn lands---- 3251912, December 6 (41 L. D., 139),

attorneys ---------------------- 1201912, December 19 (41 L. D., 443),

isolated tracts ------------ 584,587,5881912, December 30 (41 L. D., 416,

417), coal lands, paragraph IS- 481, 4821913, January 6 (41 L. D., 454),

right of way ------------------- 3351013, Tanuary 23 (41 L. D., 475),

copies of records --------------- 5161913, February 6 (42 L. D., 348),

reclamation, paragraph 37 ------- 220Paragraphs 139-144 ---------- 12

1913 March 1 (41 L. D., 532), rightof way, paragraph 3 ------------ 475

1913, March 17 (42 L. D., 345), en-larged homestead ------------- 66

1913, April 1 (42 L. D., 71), contest- 239,1913, April 24 (42 L. D., 104), Min-

nesota drainage laws ------------1913, September 6 (42 L. D., 348),

reclamation, paragraph 94 ----- 394,545Paragraphs 116-120 ---------- 686Paragraphs 139-144 ---------- 12

1913, September 19 (42 L. D., 425),forest homesteads -------------- go

1913, October 30 (42 L, D., 474) ,coal lands --------------------- 325

1913, November 1 (42 L. D., 511),three-year homestead ------------ 152

1913, November 3 (42 L. Di., 604),Ki0wa, etc.,jands --------------- 15

1914, January 2 (43 L. D., 1), sug-gestions to homesteaders -------- 01

Paragraph 47 ---------------- 6G1914, January 2 (43 L. D., 37), tim-

ber and stone, paragraph 19 --- 539,551Paragraph 20 ---------------- 504

1914, January 31 (43 L. D., 88), al-lotments ----------------------- 206

1914, February 19 (43 L. D., 118),forest lieu selections ------------ 119

1914, March 23 (43 1, D., 203), des-ert lands ---------------------- 186

1914, May 22 (43 L. D., 254), appli-Cations, etc ----------------- I-- 242

1914, June,6 (4-8 L. D., 272), allot-ments -------------------------- 296

1914, June 6 (43 L. D., 272), inter-marriage -------------------- -- P5

1914, June 16 (43 L. D., 275), Ar-kansas sunk lands --------------- 212

1914i June 17 (43 L. D., 280), FortBerthold lands ---------------- L 576

1914, November 21 (43 L. D., 459),oil land patent ------------------ 325

1914, December 24 (43 L. D., 476),railroad selections -------------- 311

1915, February 25 (43 L. D., 528),desert lands ------------------- 186

1915, March 20 (44 L.. D., 32), phos-phate, etc., lands ---------- I----- .125

ACTS OF CONGRESS CITED AND CONSTITJED.

1915, March 31 (44 L. D., )46),placer locations _-_-____-_

1915, April 13 (44 L. D., 56), desertentries -----------------------

1915, April 29 (44 L. D., 87), recla-mation entries, paragraph 2 _-_

Paragraph 3 ---------------

Page.

325

159

377378

1915, July 15 (44 L. D., 195), TrippCounty lands ____-_-____

1915, August 4 (44 'L. D., 235),copies of records _-___-__-____

1915, August 31 (44 L. D., 359),telephone lines _-_- _______

ACTS OF CONGRESS CITED AND CONSTRUED.

Page.1800, May 10 (2 Stat., 73), patents_ 5461812, April 25 (2 Stat., 716),

patents, section 8___________-_ 5461830, July 15 (7 Stat., 328), Sioux:

treaty, article 9 -------------- 1901836, July 4 (5 Stat., 107),

patents -__________________ _ 5461841, March 3 (5 Stat., 416),

patents _______----____--____- 5461843, March 3 (5 Stat., 627),

patents---------------- -- _-- 5461850, September 28 (9 Stat., 519),

swamp lands _------_________- 2071851, July 23 (10 Stat., 949), Sioux

treaty __--___--__------_-_-_ :1931854, July 17 (10 Stat., 304), Sioux

half-breed scrip _____ L 1901857, March 3 (11 Stat., 251),

swamp grant- - __-___-_2071858; June 2 (11 Stat., 294), certifi-

cate of location------- -------- 551860, March 12 (12 Stat., 3),

swamp lands ------------------1231860, June 22 (12 Stat., 85), Su-

preme Court scrip___ _-----L--- 541863, February 16 (12 Stat., 652),

Sioux Indians __-- __-__-___- 1931864, July 2 (13 Stat., 365), North-

ern Pacific grant _____ 74, 450, 507Section 2, right of way ____ 79

1867, March 2 (14 Stat., 544), pri-vate claim8 _______-_______ 54

1870, February 17 (16 Stat., 707),Klamath treaty____________-___ 124

1870, May 31 (16 Stat., 378),Northern Pacific ______-__-__- 78

1872, May 10 (17 Stat., 96), millsite, section 15 _-______ ___ _ 198

1872, June 8 (17 Stat., 333), mili-tary service ___________-___ 357

1872, June 10 (17 Stat., 378), pri-vate claim8---------------___ 54

1874, June 6 (18 Stat., 61), miningclaim _____ L ------ 256

1875, February 11 (18 Stat., 315),mining claim_ ____ -------- 256

1875, March 3, (18 Stat., 482), rightof way- - ______--_____ 7

1876, May 5 (19 Stat., 52), mininglaws - - _ - _______ 257

1878, June 3 (20 Stat., 88), timbernutting----------- -------- ___ 257

1878, June 3 (20 Stat., 89), timberand stone ______ 49. 54, 539, 584, 586

Page.1880, January 22 (21 Stat., 61),

mining claim __--_-_____-_-258, 2871880, May 14 (21 Stat., 140), settle-

ment, section 1 _---____-__-__ 352Section 2, contestant_____-___ 156,

159, 229, 368, 5801880, June 16 (21 Stat., 287), re-

payment ___--___--____-___-487, 488Section 2, repayment_____-___ 517

1881, March 3 (21 Stat., 505), min-ing claim ____-- ________ 258

1882, April 26 (22 Stat., 49), min-ing claim ___ __-__-'___ 259

1883, March 3 (22 Stat., 487), Ala-bama lands _____--___-_____- 259

1884, May 17 (23 Stat., 24), mininglaws, section 8 _______-____-259, 296

Section 26, possessory claims 84_1884, July 4 (23 Stat., 101), at-

torneys, section 5 _-_-__- 1151884, July 5 (23 Stat., 103), mili-

tary reservation ____-_8_____ 3901885, March 3 (23 Stat., 340), Uma-

tilla lands _-- __-__-___ 31887, February 8 (24 Stat., 388),

allotments, section 4 ____-_____- 189,- 230, 283, 391, 511, 520, 529

1888, May 1 (25 Stat., 113, 133)-,Gros Ventre lands _______ ___ 78

1888, October 19 (25 Stat., 611),trust patents 8_______-______ 382, 384

1889, January 14 (25 Stat., 642),Chippewa lands_-_______-__ 532, 552

1889, February 22 (25 Stat., 676),school grant __________ 27, 333, 415

1889, March 2 (25 Stat., 854), see-ton 3, leave of absence _____ 221

Section 6, additional home-stead ___-_8____ 330, 374, 381, 555

1889, March 2 (25 Stat., 888),Standing Rock lands __________ 2

1889, March 2 (25 Stat., 1013),Peoria and Miami lands _-____- 529

1890, July 8 (26 Stat., 215), Idaho,section 4 _--____-___- 347

1890, August 30 (26 Stat., 371,391), right of way __-_____- 24

Aggregate area __- _-_- __- 2601890, September 29 (26 Stat., 496),'forfeiture _ I-------------- 506

1891, February 28 (26 Stat., 794),allotment --------------- 189, 511, 521

1891, February 28 (26 Stat., 796),school land_____- 333, 837, 347, 391, 415

X-XI

Page.

325

515

514


Page.1891, March 3 (26 Stat., 1032),

Fort Berthold lands_--- 3---- 54, 3831891, March 3 (26 Stat., 1095),

confirmation, section 7 ___ 117, 179Sections 12-13, Alaska lands__ 84Section 16, townsites ______ _ 261Section 17, aggregate area_____ 261Sections 18-21, right of way--. 511Section 24, forest reserves--- 198, 316

1891, May 20 (27 Stat., 979), FortBerthold lands_______-___-___ 354, 383

1892, July 13 (27 Stat., 120, 139),Turtle Mountain Indians_--___ 326

1892, July 26 (27 Stat., 270), con-testant13 ____________-___---- I6

1892, August 4 >(27 Stat., 348),building stone -___-_-__-_____262, 288

1893, March 3 (27 Stat., 612, 642),school lands _ 7 ___-__- 336

1893, August 19 (28 Stat., 1222,1229), school lands ___________ 336

1893, November 3 (28 Stat., 6), .mining claim ____-- _-_______- 262

1894, July 16 (28 Stat., 107), Utah_ 4171894, July 18 (28 Stat., 114),

mining claim _____-________- 2621894, August 15 (28 Stat., 332),

Nez Perce lands _- __ 11894, August 18 (28 Stat., 372,

394), survey _ - 327, 346, 448, 4691894, August 23 (28 Stat., 491),

military reservation ________-_ 4851894, December 13 (28 Stat., 594),

warrants__ _____________ 551895, February 26 (28 Stat., 683),

mineral classification - -------- 74,2971895, March 2 (28 Stat., 808),

bonds ________ --------- 3171895, March 2 (28 Stat., 876, 894-

899), Wichita lands ___-____-263, 5351896, June 10 (29 Stat., 321, 326),

Chippewa Indians- _________ 534, 536Section 8, Fort Belknap lands- 264Section 9, Blaekfeet lands ---- 264Section 10, San Carlos lands-- 264

1897, January 13 (29 Stat., 484),-reservoirs _______-____-___- 469

1897, February 11 (29 Stat., 526),petroleum lands_______-______ 265 *289

1897, June 4 (30 Stat., 34, 35, 36),forest reserves----------------- 119,

198, 265, 316, 473,4951897, June 7 (30 Stat., 67), Chip-

pewa lands -_____--____-_-__- 5551898, April 29 (30 Stat., 367), Ar-

kansas sunk lands _____ 2071898, May 11 (30 Stat., 404), sec-

tion 2, right of way __________ 5111898, May 14 (30 Stat., 409), sec-

tion 1, roadway reservation -_ 85Section 2, tide lands_________- 444Section 10, possessory claims--_: 22,

83, 84Section 13, mining rights-- 266, 315

Page.1898, June 21 (30 Stat., 484),

New Mexico ______________ 461, 4901898, July 1 (30 Stat., 597, 620),

Northern Pacific ___ --------- 27,80, 225, 450, 506, 507

1900, May 17 (3-1 Stat., 179), sec-ond homestead- ----------------- 96

1900, June 5 (31 Stat., 267), sec-ond homestead __-___-96, 105, 555

1900, June 6 (31 Stat., 321), sec-tion 15, Alaska mining claims__ 267, 298

Section 26, mining claims____ 24, 268Section 27, mission claims ____ 85

1900, June 6 (31 Stat., 672, 676,680), Fort Hall lands =___-_-__- 268

1901, January 31 (31 Stat., 745),saline lands -----------------269, 291

1901, February 15 (31 Stat., 790),right of way ___________ 471, 512

1901, March 3 (31 Stat., 1084),highway ------------- - -33----- 556

1902, May 3 (32 Stat., 188),school lands ___________ __ 417

1902, May 22 (32 Stat, 203), sec-ond homestead__-- ____-___96, 105, 555

1902, May 27 (32 Stat., 263), Uintahlands -- --269

1902, June 17 (32 Stat., 388)i rec-lamation--- 13, 58, 88, 105, 331, 386, 545

1902, June 27 (32 Stat., 400), Chip-pewa lands _ ______-_____ 534,.553

1902, July 1 (32 Stat., 730), Uma-tilla lands--- 3

1903, February 9 (32 Stat., 820),town sites_______33__---__-__ 552

1903, February 12 (32 Stat., 825),oil mining claims _-____-_____- 270

1903, March 3 (32 Stat., 998), Un-compahgre lands -- ___ 270

1903, March 3 (32 Stat., 1028),Alaska homesteads -------------83, 85

1904, March 4 (33 Stat., 59), affi-davits, etc ________ _ 183

1904, April 21 (33 Stat, 189, 194),Turtle Mountain Indians____3___ 525

1904, April 21 (33 Stat., 224), sec-tion 25, Yuma Indians_____-____ 393

1904, April 23 (33 Stat., 297), trust- patents __________--___-_-____- 1431904, April 23 (33 Stat, 302),

Flathead lands______-__ 12, 28,240,242Sections 5, 8, 10, mineral lands- 271

1904, April 27 (33 Stat., 352), Crowlands _____-- ___________-- 121

Section 5, price _________ 2721904, April-28 (33 Stat., 527), addi-

tional homestead ______ 105, 381, 5551904, April 28 (33 Stat., 539), Chip-

pewa lands_-_____________-____ 5341904, April 28 (33 Stat., 547), Kin-

kaid Act ------------------ 105, 1751904, December 21 (33 Stat., 595),

section 3, Yakima lands ___-____- 2721905, February 1 (33 Stat., 628),

national forests __-____-_____-L- 316

XXII


Page.1905, March 3 (33 Stat., 1005),

Chippewa lands____________-_ 555

1905,; March 3 (33 Stat., 1016),section 2, Shoshone lands___-_ 273, 570

1906, March 22 (34 Stat., SO), Col-ville lands _-- _-- ___-_____- 273

1906, May 17 (34 Stat., 197), Alaskaallotments -- ____-113, 296, 506

1906, June 5 (34 Stat., 213), Kiowalands _____________--_--__-__ 508

1906, June 11 (34 Stat., 233), foresthomesteads -------------------- 30,

105, 206, 359, 413, 449, 550

1906, June 16 (34 Stat., 267), sec-tion 7, school land -- __ 336

1906, June 21 (34 Stat., 325, 336),Coeur d!Alene lands -- : _ 274

1906, June 21 (34 Stat., 325, 372),Sioux Indians- - ----------_ 193

1906, June 27 (34 Stat., 517), iso-lated tracts33_____-____- I--- 588

1906, June 27 (34 Stat., 519), sec-tion 5, desert entries_______3-_ 58

1906, June 28 (34 Stat., 550),Kiowa lands_________---------- 508

1906, November 6 (34 Stat., 3256),Coeur d'Alene forest __ ___ 346

1907, March 1 (34 Stat., 1042),Fort Berthold lands ____ 383

1907, March 2 (34 Stat., 1218),school lands __- ______-_- 390

1907; March 2 (34 Stat., 1230),Tlipp County lands_ __-_-______- 195

1907, March 2 (34 Stat., 1232),section 4, Alaska surveys _- - 284

1907, March 2 (35 Stat., 1243),Alaska mining claims---------- 274

1907, March 2 (34 Stat., 3301),Umpqua National Forest ______ 115

1908, March 26 (35 Stat., 43), re-payment __ _ _-__- _ 3, 488

Section 1, repayment - 3 _- _ 3,517Section 2, repayment-_ 3, 584, 586, 588

1908, March 28 (35 Stat., 52), sec-tion 3, desert land ______ 58

1908, May 20 (35 Stat., 169),drainage ------ 330, 333

1908, May 23 (35 Stat., 268), sec-tion 4, Chippewa lands 33_-___ 552

1908, May 27 (35 Stat., 317, 365),Mount Rainier mining locations_' 284

1908, May 29 (35 Stat., 444, 448),section 15, Flathead project ---- 12

1908, May 29 (35 Stat., 460),Standing Rock lands_----------- 1

1908, May 29 (35 Stat., 465, 467),Bitter Root lands______________- 275

1908, May 30 (35 Stat., 558), FortPeck lands ---------------1, 284, 501

1909, February 6 (33 Stat., 598),Cordova Bay -____----__-___-_ 444

v - Page.1909, February 19 (35 Stat., 639),

enlarged homestead -_-___-___ 25,26, 62, 66, 108, 111, 135, 330, 348, 375, 576

Section 3, additional _____ 413, 489Section 6, entry without resi-

dence- -_________--_--__-_- 4941909, February 24 (35 Stat., 645),

mineral surveys ____-____--- 2751909, February 24 (35 Stat., 645),

amendment ------ ____-_ 176, 181, 5111909, February 25 (35 Stat., 650),

Shoshone lands __ 2761909, March 3 (35 Stat., 779), Im-

perial Valley lands --____-____ 761909, March 3 (35 Stat., 781, 7

82),

allotment _- __-__-192, 240, 385, 5051909, March- 3 (35 Stat., 781, 796),

Flathead lands___ --- _------- 281909, March 3 (35 Stat., 844), sur-

face patent __- ______-34, 49, 123, 3251910, April 12 (36 Stat., 296), Flat-

head villa sites_____--___------- 391910, May 9 (36 Stat, 2694), Gila

National Forest ____-___-_- 1381910, May 11 (36 Stat., 354), Gla-

cier National Park ___-_____- 2841910, May 26 (36 Stat., 431), tele-

phone lines ____-____---- 3591910, June 1 (36 Stat., 455), Fort

Berthold lands_____-__-_ 382, 383,4521910, June 7 (36 Stat., 459), Alaska

mining claims _________ 2761910, June 7 (36 Stat., 459), public

parks _--_--_______--_______-284, 3071910, June 17 (36 Stat., 531), en-

larged homestead ___ 62, 66, 108, 1111910, June 20 (36 Stat., 557), Ari-

zona and New Mexico_ 138, 418, 469, 4901910, June 22 (36 Stat., 583), agri-

cultural entries; coal lands __ 34,48, 105, 325, 350, 483

1910, June 23 (36 Stat., 592), recla-mation_______-13,140,201, 220, 333, 335

1910, June 25 (36 Stat., 739), min-eral classification _________ 74

1910, June 25 (36 Stat., 847), with-drawals ---------------------- _30, 44,

119, 178, 276, 325, 412, 420,435, 445, 473, 483, 569, 585.

1910, June 25 (36 Stat., 848),miners' liens------------------- 284

1910, June 25 (36 Stat., 855), sec-tions 1 and 4, allotments 521

Section 17, allotments______-189,192Section 27, Chippewa lands___-- 553

1910, September 9 (36 Stat., 2742),Crow lands ____--__--_________-122

1911, February 3 (38 Stat., 896),second entry__________3-__-____ 52

1911, February 28 (36 Stat., 960),desert entries3 ______-____-___ 58

lll, March 2 (36 Stat., 1015), oiland gas locations _______ 277, 289, 343

1911, March 3 (36 Stat., 1080),Gros Ventre lands _____ __ 79

XXIII


Page.1911, March 3 (36 Stat., 1084),

withdrawals; homesteads____-- 4491911, March 3 (36 Stat., 1087), sec-

tion 148, Court of Claims __-_ 8_ 5321911, March 4 (36 Stat., 1253),

right of way____88___-_-_ 335, 359, 5121912, January 6 (37 Stat, 1723),

New Mexico__________---______ 1381912, January 26 (37 Stat., 56),

desert entries ___ _ 581912, March 28 (38 Stat., 77), iso-

lated tracts_______8__-__ 354, 584,5871912, April 3 (37 Stat., 631), Fort

Berthold lands__ ____ - ----- 3841912, April 30 (37 Stat., 106),

desert entries ----- ____________ 581912, June 6 (37 Stat., 123), three-

year homestead _____-___-_ 61,66, 101, 135, 152, 221, 228, 339, 578

1912, June 13 (37 Stat., 132), en-larged homestead _-__-______-- 1

1912, July 24 (37 Stat., 200), desertentri6s ----------- _______--- 386

1912, August 1 (37 Stat., 242),Alaska mining laws __________ 278, 301

1912, August 9 (87 Stat., 265), rec-lamation __ _ 20, 140, 204

1912, August 9 (37 Stat., 267), en-larged homestead ____ 93, 349, 414

1912, August 24 (37 Stat., 496), oiland gas lands-88 _____________ 33

1912, August 24 (37 Stat., 497), -withdrawals ---------278, 325, 435, 483

1912, August 24 (37 Stat., 497),,records ------------------ 235

1912, August 24 (37 Stat., 506), en-larged homestead .__-__-_-142, 330

1912, August 24 (37 Stat., 527), 4easement _________-__-------- 40

1913, February 11 (37 Stat., 666),enlarged homestead 8 _______ 375, 413

1918, February 14 (37 Stat., 675),Standing Rock lands -- _______ 43

1913, March 3 (37 Stat., 738), cer-tified checks _--____________- 171

1913, March 4 (37 Stat., 1007), In-dian occupants_______--______-_- 509

1913, June 30 (38 Stat., 92), Kiowalands ------------------------ 44

1913, September 30 (38 Stat., 113),restored lands _____- __-___:- 284

1918, October 30 (38 Stat., 234),desert entries _______-________- 58

1913, December.1 (38 Stat., 235),mining claims_-___________-_ 279

Page.1914; March 12 (38 Stat., 305),

Alaska railroad ___-__________- 251914, April 6 (38 Stat., 312), inter-

marriage - ____ -__ -_____95, 2431914, May 28 (38 Stat., 383), Fort

Berthold lands ____-_-__-_----- 5751914, July 17 (38 Stat., 509), phos-

phate, etc., lands __-_______-__ 28,32, 121, 128, 179, 280, 325, 378

1914,,July 17 (38 Stat., 510), Flat-head project ------------------14

1914, August 1 (38 Stat., 582), sec-tion 16, Kiowa lands ______ 508

1914, August 8 (38 Stat.,681), FortBerthold lands8 _________ 384,452, 575

1914, August 13 (38 Stat., 686), sec-tion 1, construction charge ___ 544

Section 8, reclamation- ------ 891914, August 25 (38 Stat, 708), oil

and gas locators _______ 281, 32519i4, September 5 (38 Stat., 712),

second homestead _-______-___- 5551914, October 20 (38 Stat., 741),

Alaska coal lands___----------- 91914, October 22 (38 Stat., 754),

internal revenue ____- _____ 5311914, October 22 (38 Stat., 766),

deserted wife __ I 95, 4941915, January 11 (38 Stat., 792),

Tripp County lands--- 195, 282, 825, 3561915, January 11 (38 Stat., 792),

phosphate locations ---------- 46, 2831915, February 25 (38 Stat., 813),

Wisconsin Central settlers ___ 3811915, March 8 (38 Stat., 958), en-

larged homestead_------------- 261915, March 3 (38 Stat., 956), en-

larged homestead_-- 25, 26, 6,, 330, 3751915, March 4 (38 Stat., 1100), tele-

phone lines, etc ____-_-__-___- 5141915, March 4 (38 Stat., 1138,

1161-2), section 5, desert en-tries _____ 56, 151, 159, 170, 477, 501

1915, March 4 (38 Stat., 1162), vali-dation enlarged homesteads---- 141,

330, 3751915, March 4 (38 Stat., 1162),

enlarged homestead; nondesig-nated land_--------- 25, 26, 68, 89, 109

1915, March 4 (38 Stat., 1215),reclamation entries_______----- 87, 544

1915, March 4 (88 Stat., 1219),Kiowa, etc., homesteads________- 86

1915, December 17 (Pub. Res. No.2), internal revenue ____---- 531

XXIV

RULES OF PRACTICE CITED AND CONSTRUED.

REVISED STATUTES CITED AND CONSTRUED.

Section. . Page.441_______________ 6_____-_-__ 535463 --------- _ __ 4632238 ______ I_ --- 3102261_ _-- ____----------______ 5392275 _________ _ 333, 337, 347, 4152276 ____-- ___--____________-347, 4152288 ____________________ __1072289 __--______----_-_-_-_ 5762291-2297 ____ _____-____-__-105, 2282292__ _______ 7_______:182294 -___ I---------------- 3.522297 ____--____--_______--___--- 5782301 ______--______--___-242, 452, 5552304 _-- ___-- ___-- __-- _-- ___- 5032305____ ___ I_ _ -_ _ 5042306 _____--__9______ 245, 357, 483, 5412307 _____-- __---- __-- _--__-65, 4832318-2346 _____ _ 2472322 -------------------------_ 2852323_ ____-- _-- _-- __-- __-__ 2872324 _____________ _289, 300

Section. Page.2325 _-- ____---- __-47, 154, 2992326 ___ -------------------- 2992327 __-------- _____-- ______-_- 1752328- -__ ____--_--___-_____-2852330 __ ___-____________ _ 2892331 __________ __-______-__- 2902332__ ____________--____--___- 3052333 _ _ _ _-___-__-___- 3012334 ________--__--____ 153, 308, 3162337- --- ____-____-___ -198, 30323473 _________-- _____ 584, .586, 5882347-2348 ________--__----__-__- 4812347-2352 3 ___-- _-- __- _____ 5842357 _______----___--___ 584, 587, 5882369-2372 ____----__---__- 1762372 _ ________ _ 176, 181, 5112373 ___--____________--___ --_. 402455 __--__----__--__________ 762478 _________-- __________-:_ 1543478 _------ __-- _______- 1144701 _ ___--____--__________ 503

RULES OF PRACTICE CITED AND CONSTRUED.

Rule. Page. Rule.1-------------------------------_ 146 14 __-_-__- __-_-_-_____-___-___2 579 20-------------------------3------------------------------ 365 83 _ I----------------5_----___------_______--__---147, 363 87 _-_-__-_-__-_-_-_-___-_-___7-------------------------------- 368 98 ________- ____- __- __-___-__-__8____--___--_----__--______--374, 568

xxv

Page.15642

366114365

DECISIONS

RELATING TO

TH1E PUBLIC LANDS.

INSTRUCTIONS.

March 2, 1915.

STANDING ROCK INDIAN LANDS-DESIGNATION UNDER ENLARGED HOmESTEAD ACT.Lands within the portion of the Standing Rock Indian reservation, in North Dakota,

opened inder the provisions of the act of May 29, 1908, are subject to designationunder the enlarged homestead act as amended by the act of June 13, 1912.

JONrEs, First Assistant Secretary:I am in receipt of your [Director of

DECISIONS CASES RELATING TO THE PUBLIC LANDS

Documents

Transcript of DECISIONS CASES RELATING TO THE PUBLIC LANDS