Decision making
-
Upload
hariz-mustafa -
Category
Education
-
view
11 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Decision making
![Page 1: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
DECISION MAKING
![Page 2: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
DEFINITION
• Decision making: A choice process, in which one among several possibilities is selected.
![Page 3: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
DEFINITION
Examples• From alternative solutions, have to
decide the best solution to solve a problem.
• To decide the future major from several majors in faculty.
• To decide what job to take.• To decide what to do today.
![Page 4: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
DEFINITION
• Emotional Intelligence helps one to make important life decisions.
![Page 5: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
SCOPE
1. Individual Decision Making
2. Group Decision Making
![Page 6: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
INDIVIDUAL DECISION MAKING
• Is done by the individual alone.
• To solve personal problems, academic problems, social problems, etc.
• Is more adaptive.
• Is constrained by imperfect information, time and cost factors.
![Page 7: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
INDIVIDUAL DECISION MAKING
• Factors that can affect decision:
1) Personality
One’s abilities, temperament, motives, attitudes, traits, aversion to or preference for risk.
![Page 8: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
INDIVIDUAL DECISION MAKING
2) EmotionWhen we feel happy, we tend to perceive things more positively, hence might decide to agree on someone’s request and vice versa.
“Love is blind!”
![Page 9: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
INDIVIDUAL DECISION MAKING
3) FramingThe way in which a problem or
question is presented.Example: Subjects of an experiments
agree to take the medicine when they were told that “the success rate is 50%” rather than when they were told that “the failure rate is 50%”
![Page 10: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
INDIVIDUAL DECISION MAKING
4) Perception
First impression, halo effect.
2 Examples:
First impression: Positive first impression might influence someone to overestimate the positive points in someone.
![Page 11: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
INDIVIDUAL DECISION MAKING
Halo Effect: A general impression that is favorable or unfavorable that is used to evaluate specific traits.
Example: A college professor with a strong belief in perfect attendance may downgrade the performance of students who attend class irregularly.
![Page 12: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Group Decision Making
• Is done by more than one individual.
• Needed in organizations.
• Is known as “choice by consensus.”
![Page 13: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Group Decision Making
• Advantages:
1) Greater sum total of knowledge or information
2) Greater number of approaches to a problem
3) Participation increases acceptance of the decision
![Page 14: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Group Decision Making
4) Better comprehension of the decision
5) Responsibility is diffused and less risk for an individual.
![Page 15: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Group Decision Making
• Disadvantages:
1) Social Pressure
The desire to be a good group member and to be accepted tends to silence disagreement.
![Page 16: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Group Decision Making
2) Acceptance of solutions
The first solution that appears to receive strong support from the majority of the members tend to be accepted most of the time. Higher-quality solutions introduced after it has little chance of receiving real consideration.
![Page 17: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Group Decision Making
3) Individual dominationChances for someone to exert more
influence on the decision.
4) Winning the decisionMembers feel the pressure to support
a particular position, and the result is, a compromise decision of lower quality.
![Page 18: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Groupthink
• A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members’ strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action.
![Page 19: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Groupthink
• Factors that cause it:
1) The process of polarization
The tendency for group discussion to make beliefs and attitudes more extreme.
![Page 20: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Groupthink
2) The cohesiveness of the members of the group.
Members of cohesive groups prefer to agree with one another and discourage dissent.
Some members should play as the “devil’s advocate,” to challenge the group thinking.
![Page 21: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Groupthink
3) The size of the group
The effect is more in a larger group.
![Page 22: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Groupthink
• Consequences:
1) The illusion of invulnerability
Groups may make risky decision
“Titanic will never sink”
2) Shared stereotypes
Negative attitude towards outsiders or competitor.
![Page 23: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Groupthink
3) Illusion of group morality
The unquestioned belief that the group’s decisions will be moral and good keeps group members from considering possible negative/unethical consequences of decisions.
![Page 24: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Groupthink
4) Direct pressure
Pressure members not to express arguments against group to reestablish feeling of harmony or sign of loyalty.
![Page 25: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Groupthink
5) Self-censorshipDoubts regarding the group decision
are suppressed
6) Mind guardingMembers protect each other from any
information that might interfere with the cohesiveness of the group.
![Page 26: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Groupthink
• EXAMPLES of bad decision as a result of Groupthink:
1) President Kennedy’s ill-fated decision to send Cuban expatriates to defeat in the Bay of Pigs invasion of Castro’s Cuba
2) NASA’s fatal decision in 1986 to launch the space shuttle Challenger.
![Page 27: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Groupthink
• How to avoid?
1) Bring in outside experts with opinions that differs from the group.
2) Ask all members to be `critical evaluators’ who look at all sides of the problems.
![Page 28: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Groupthink
3)To keep influencing the group, the leader should:
- keep personal opinions to self until everyone has expressed theirs.
- occasionally miss a meeting and allow someone else to lead.
![Page 29: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Groupthink
4) Once a tentative solution has been reached, give members a “second chance” to rethink their choice and to openly express any doubts before agreeing to the final solution.
![Page 30: Decision making](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022013003/5454251daf795987748b66c0/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Online notes
• Everyone read the points to ponder page 2- 4.
• Do not ask someone else to make decision for you.
• Be brave and confident to make your own decision.