Kundenzufriedenheit & Beschwerdemanagement - Der Augenblick der Wahrheit -
Decision Fatigue Among Physicians...Consumer purchasing for custom-made products (Levav et al.,...
Transcript of Decision Fatigue Among Physicians...Consumer purchasing for custom-made products (Levav et al.,...
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Decision Fatigue Among Physicians
Han Ye, Junjian Yi, Songfa Zhong
0 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Questions
• Why Barack Obama in gray or blue suit?
• Why Mark Zuckerberg in gray T-shirt?
1 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Questions
• Why Barack Obama in gray or blue suit?
• Why Mark Zuckerberg in gray T-shirt?
Obama: “You’ll see I wear only gray or blue suits. I’m trying to paredown decisions. I don’t want to make decisions about what I’m eatingor wearing. Because I have too many other decisions to make.”
Zuckerberg: “I really want to clear my life to make it so that I have tomake as few decisions as possible about anything except how to bestserve this community.”
2 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Research Questions
• Whether and how decision fatigue affects physician behavior?
• What kind of physicians are more vulnerable to decision fatigue?
3 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Literature: Decision Fatigue
Making too many decisions depletes individuals’ executive functionand mental resources, which may influence their subsequent decisions(Baumeister et al., 1998; Stanovich and West, 2000; Kahneman, 2011;Baumeister and Tierney, 2012).
• Consumer purchasing for custom-made products (Levav et al.,2010)
• Judicial parole decisions (Danziger et al., 2011)
• Voter behavior (Augenblick et al., 2015)
• Financial analysts’ forecasts (Hirshleifer et al., 2017)
4 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Literature: Physician Behavior
Physicians’ decisions are affected by a variety of factors irrelevant topatient health, which may lead to large variations in procedure use,medical expenditure and patient outcomes.
• Peer effects among doctors and organizational culture (Lee andMongan, 2009)
• Medical liability system (Currie and McLeod, 2008; Frakes, 2013)
• Physician beliefs about treatment (Cutler et al., 2013)
• Physicians’ financial incentives (Clemens and Gottlieb, 2014)
• Quality of physicians’ human capital (Currie and McLeod, 2017)
5 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Patient Flow
Source: The hospital A&E website6 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Patient Flow Data
An entire set of ED visits from January 2011 to December 2012 in anacute general hospital of SG (264,115 patient cases).
For each patient case, we observe detailed timestamps (e.g. thestart and end times of triage, consultation, and task orders) andphysician identifiers.
With these data, we are able to reconstruct
• Real-time patient flow volume in the ED
• Patient’s entire path through the ED
• Physician’s shift schedules
• Sequences of actual patients who are seen by the physician ineach shift
• Potential patients who arrive during a time when the physician’sshift is in progress
7 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Patient Information
• Basic demographics: birthdate, gender, address
• Patient acuity category scale (PACS)
• Arrival mode: ambulance or walk in
• Disposition type: discharge home, follow-up in primary care,inpatient admission ...
8 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Sample Restrictions
All patient cases whose attending physician
• has at least 10 shifts observed
• is working in a shift with shift length 6 -16 hours
• 242,761 patient cases, with 124 physician identities
9 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Dependent Variables
Physician decisions
1. physician discharge decision (dummies)
• outpatient disposition (discharge home or follow-up)• discharge home• inpatient admission
2. task orders
• total number of task orders (treatments and diagnostic tests)• number of diagnostic tests
3. patient length of stay
• from the start to the end of patient case consultation
Patient outcomes (dummies)
1. death in the ED
2. return visits to the ED within 14 days
10 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Independent Variables: Decision Fatigue
1. Number of patients seen by the physician prior to the indexedpatient’s arrival
2. Hours relative to the shift beginning
11 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Table: Summary statistics of outcome variables
12 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Table: Summary statistics
13 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Graphic Evidence
.5.6
.7.8
.9O
utpa
tient
Dis
posi
tion
A
.2.3
.4.5
.6D
isch
arge
Hom
e
B
0.1
.2.3
.4H
ospi
tal A
dmis
sion
C
02
46
8N
umbe
r of T
asks
D
02
46
Num
ber o
f Tes
ts
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >20
E
2050
8011
0Le
ngth
of S
tay(
min
s)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >20
F
Figure: Physician decisions over the number of previous cases
14 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Regression Specifications
The baseline regression describing the association between fatigue andphysician decisions is as follows:
Yijt = Fatigueijtα+Xiβ + Ttγ + νj + εijt (1)
• Yijt - decisions for or outcome of patient i, treated by physician jwith consultation start time t
• Fatigueijt - number of cases seen by physician j prior to patienti’s arrival
• Xi - patient characteristics including gender, age (in quadraticform), and PACS index
• Tt - time fixed effects: hour of day, day of week and month-yearinteractions
• νj - physician fixed effects
• standard errors clustered at the physician level
15 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
OLS Results
Table: Fatigue on physician decisions
16 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Identification
Is the assignment of patients to physicians random?
• patient side
• physician side
• hospital administrators
IV: number of hospital ambulance arrivals
• an important determinant for the physician’s workload
• plausibly exogenous to the underlying health of a given patient
→ isolate the causal effect of workload on physician decision making
17 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Identification
Is the assignment of patients to physicians random?
• patient side
• physician side
• hospital administrators
IV: number of hospital ambulance arrivals
• an important determinant for the physician’s workload
• plausibly exogenous to the underlying health of a given patient
→ isolate the causal effect of workload on physician decision making
17 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
2SLS Results
Table: Fatigue on physician decisions
18 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Break within the Shift
Mental resources might be replenished by a short rest which increasesglucose and leads to a positive mood (Danziger et al., 2011).
Restricted sample of visits:
• the physician is in a shift with an at-least-one-hour break (not incharge of any patient case)
• break up a shift into two distinct sessions (before and after break)
• around 10%, 23,733 visits
19 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Graphic Evidence
.4.5
.6.7
.8.9
Out
patie
nt D
ispo
sitio
n
A
.1.2
.3.4
.5.6
Dis
char
ged
Hom
e
B
0.1
.2.3
.4.5
Hos
pita
l Adm
issi
on
C
02
46
810
Num
ber o
f Tas
ks
D
13
57
Num
ber o
f Tes
ts
0 5 10>=
15 0 5 10>=
15
E
2040
6080
Leng
th o
f Sta
y(m
ins)
0 5 10>=
15 0 5 10>=
15
F
Before Break After Break
Figure: Physician decisions over the number of previous within-session cases
20 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Specification 1
Yijt = α1TotalCaseij + α2Session2ij +∑m
α3mDijm
+Xiβ + Ttγ + νj + εijt
(2)
• TotalCaseij - total number of cases seen by physician j prior topatient i’s arrival
• Session2 - indicator for the after-break session
• Dm - dummies indicating the first three cases in each session
• D1 - 1st case in session 1• D2 - 2nd case in session 1• D3 - 3rd case in session 1• D4 - 1st case in session 2• D5 - 2nd case in session 2• D6 - 3rd case in session 2
21 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Table: Analysis using dummies for the first three decisions in a session
22 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Specification 2
Yijt = α1Caseij + α2Session2ij + α3Caseij ∗ Session2ij
+Xiβ + Ttγ + νj + εijt(3)
• Case - number of previous cases within the current session
• Session2 - indicator for the after-break session
• Case ∗ Session2 - interaction term between Case and Session2
23 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Table: Analysis of linear trend between sessions
24 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Robustness 1: Alternative Fatigue Measure
Alternative measure of fatigue - cumulative hours elapsed in thephysician’s shift
Yijt =∑m
αm1(dt− t(j, t)e = m) +Xiβ + Ttγ + νj + εijt (4)
• t− t(j, t): patient’s arrival time relative to shift beginning
• αm: the average effect of m hours’ work (rounded up to thenearest nonnegative integer) on physician decisions
• reference category: visits arriving more than six hours after shiftbeginning
25 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Table: Robustness 1 - Alternative fatigue measure
26 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Table: Robustness 2 - Number of patients in the ED
27 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Table: Robustness 3 - Include both the cumulative minutes andnumber of previous cases
28 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Other Robustness Checks
Restrictions on physician working hours
- Shift length:
• 8-12 hours
• 8-10 hours
29 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Heterogeneous Analysis 1 - Nonlinear Fatigue Effects
Yijt =∑m
αmDijm +Xiβ + Ttγ + νj + εijt (5)
Dijm - dummy indicator: number of cases seen by physician j beforepatient i’s arrival falls into group m
• D1: number of previous cases is between 0 to 2
• D2: number of previous cases is between 3 to 5
• D3: number of previous cases is between 6 to 8
• D4: number of previous cases is between 9 to 11
• D5: number of previous cases is between 12 to 14
• D6: number of previous cases is between 15 to 17
• D7: number of previous cases is between 18 to 20
• reference category: number of previous cases is larger than 20
30 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Nonlinear Fatigue Effects
-.08
-.06
-.04
-.02
0O
utpa
tient
-.08
-.06
-.04
-.02
0D
isch
arge
d
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8Ad
mitt
ed
0.5
11.
52
Ord
erco
unt
0.5
11.
5Te
stco
unt
0-2 3-5 6-8 9-11 12-14 15-17 18-20
0.2
.4.6
lnLo
S
0-2 3-5 6-8 9-11 12-14 15-17 18-20
#Previous cases
Figure: Parameter estimates with 95% CI 31 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Heterogeneous Analysis 2
Consider both quantity and composition of cases seen by thephysician, before the indexed patient’s arrival
• total number of cases: overall tendency
• number of severe cases: severe cases are likely to cost much morephysician effort in terms of concentration and medical inputs
32 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Table: Heterogeneous analysis 2 - number of previous severe cases
33 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Will physician decision fatigue increase patient risk?
34 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Physician Decision Fatigue and Patient Outcomes
***
0.0076
0.0102
0.0
03.0
06.0
09.0
12Pe
rcen
tage
of D
eath
Below mean Above mean
A
***
0.1162
0.1326
0.0
4.0
8.1
2.1
6Pe
rcen
tage
of R
evis
iting
Below mean Above mean
B
Number of previous cases below (Left) versus above (Right) the sample mean
(A) Data for PACS1&PACS2 cases. (B)Data for all cases.
Figure: Patient outcomes over the number of previous cases
35 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Table: Physician decision fatigue on patient outcomes
36 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue?
Physician specific fatigue effects
• obtained from IV estimations for each physician in our sample
Physician characteristics
• gender, medical credentials, graduation year and school
• collected from Singapore Medical Council (SMC)
• 104 out of 124 physicians in our sample
37 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Summary Statistics
Table: Physician characteristics and fatigue effects
38 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
.3.4
.5.6
.3.4
.5.6
.3.4
.5.6
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 >20
A
B
C
Discha
rged H
ome
Graphs by physician experience
Data for patients who were seen by physicians with medical experience
(A) less than 10 years; (B) 10 to 17 years; (C) over 17 years.
Figure: Proportion of discharge home over the number of previous cases39 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
23
45
62
34
56
23
45
6
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 >20
A
B
C
Numb
er of
Tests
Graphs by physician experience
Data for patients who were seen by physicians with medical experience
(A) less than 10 years; (B) 10 to 17 years; (C) over 17 years.
Figure: Average test orders over the number of previous cases40 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Table: Correlates of fatigue effects and physician characteristics
41 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Conclusions
Research questions
• Whether and how decision fatigue affects physician behavior?
• What kind of physicians are more vulnerable to decision fatigue?
42 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Answers to Research Questions
Decision fatigue: Physicians show an increased tendency to
• adopt outpatient disposition especially discharge home
• reduce task orders
• shorten patient length of stay
→ increased ED mortality and return visits
Physician characteristics influence the magnitudes of fatigue effects
• medical experience: U-shaped
• gender: Male ↑
43 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Implications
To counteract the effects of decision fatigue
• more breaks;
• serious cases as earlier cases;
• more physicians and less choices.
44 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Thank you for your comments!
44 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Appendix Figures
.6.7
.8.9
.6.7
.8.9
.6.7
.8.9
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 >20
A
B
C
Outpa
tient D
isposi
tion
Graphs by physician experience
Data for patients who were seen by physicians with medical experience
(A) less than 10 years; (B) 10 to 17 years; (C) over 17 years.
Figure: Proportion of outpatient disposition over number of previous cases45 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
0.1
.2.3
0.1
.2.3
0.1
.2.3
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 >20
A
B
C
Hospi
tal Ad
missio
n
Graphs by physician experience
Data for patients who were seen by physicians with medical experience
(A) less than 10 years; (B) 10 to 17 years; (C) over 17 years.
Figure: Proportion of hospital admission over the number of previous cases46 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
24
68
24
68
24
68
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 >20
A
B
C
Numb
er of
Tasks
Graphs by physician experience
Data for patients who were seen by physicians with medical experience
(A) less than 10 years; (B) 10 to 17 years; (C) over 17 years.
Figure: Average task orders over the number of previous cases47 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
050
100
050
100
050
100
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 >20
A
B
C
Leng
th of
Stay(m
ins)
Graphs by physician experience
Data for patients who were seen by physicians with medical experience
(A) less than 10 years; (B) 10 to 17 years; (C) over 17 years.
Figure: Average length of stay over the number of previous cases48 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Appendix Tables
Table: Robustness - Restrictions on physician working hoursshift length 8 - 12 hours
49 / 50
Introduction Data Empirical Analysis Who Are More Responsive to Fatigue? Conclusion
Table: Robustness - Restrictions on physician working hoursshift length 8 - 10 hours
50 / 50