Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

30
AGCCC UNCLASSIFIED 1 Purchase of a Pre- Workout Supplement Decision Briefing CPT Billy Polk CPT CPT CPT

Transcript of Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

Page 1: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

1

Purchase of a Pre-Workout Supplement

Decision BriefingCPT Billy Polk

CPT CPTCPT

Page 2: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

2

Purpose

To gain your concurrence on my decision of which pre-workout supplement is best for me to purchase

Page 3: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

3

Problem

To determine the best pre-workout supplement to purchase with the primary purpose of improving energy levels during physical fitness training sessions

Page 4: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

4

RecommendationThe Honda Odyssey (LX) midsize minivan is the best vehicle to purchase

**Sample**

Page 5: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

5

Prior Coordination

- None Needed

Page 6: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

6

Outline

- Background- Facts Bearing on the

Problem- Assumptions- References- Courses of Action

(COA)- Screening Criteria- Screened Out COAs

- Surviving COAs- Evaluation Criteria- Priority of Critiera- Analysis of each COA- Comparison of COAs- Conclusion - Recommendation- Decision

Page 7: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

7

Background- Consistent use of caffeine supplements- High tolerance levels to caffeine- Currently using 200mg caffeine pill per day

- I want to minimize calories- Trying to lose fat for APFT prep

- Desire a pre-workout supplement that is:- High caffeine - Low calorie- Contains creatine and nitric oxide- Appropriately priced per serving

Page 8: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

8

- Very concerned about caffeine; must have 200mg- Very concerned about cost; cannot exceed $27,000- Very concerned about front leg room and head room - Very concerned with seating; must seat six adults- Concerned with fuel economy- Concerned with the cargo and luggage space- Somewhat concerned about warranty; need a warranty

of at least 3 yr / 36,000 miles

Facts Bearing on the Problem

Page 9: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

9

Assumptions- The cost of the vehicles researched will remain

constant until my purchase

- No additional funds will become available to buy a new vehicle that costs more than $27,000

- No manufacturing recalls due to vehicle malfunctions

- My follow on duty station after the Adjutant General Captains' Career Course (AGCCC) will be CONUS and not an overseas tour**Sample**

Page 10: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

10

References

- Edmunds: 2008 New Car Prices, Reviews & Info, http://www.edmunds.com/new/index.html

- Car Crash Test Guide: 2008 New Car Crash Test Results & Ratings, http://www.automotive.com/new-cars/safety/

- Vehicle information sheets were used for warranty, cost, and information.

**Sample**

Page 11: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

11

Courses of Action- Chrysler Pacifica (Crossover Vehicle) - Chrysler Town & Country (LX) (Midsize Minivan)- Dodge Caravan (SXT) (Midsize Minivan) - Ford Freestyle (SEL) (Crossover) - Honda Odyssey (LX) (Midsize Minivan) - Mercury Monterey (LUX) (Midsize Minivan)- Nissan Quest (SL) (Midsize Minivan) - Pontiac Montana (SV6) (Midsize Minivan)**Sample**

Page 12: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

12

Screening Criteria(1 of 2)

- Cost: Cost of the vehicle must not exceed the manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP) of $27,000

- Safety Rating: Vehicle must have an overall safety rating of five stars

- Side Curtain Airbag: Vehicle must have the side curtain airbag safety system

- Leg Room: Vehicle must have at least 40 inches of front leg room **Sample**

Page 13: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

13

Screening Criteria(2 of 2)

- Head Room: Vehicle must have at least 39 inches of front head room

- Seating: Vehicle must have seating capacity for at least six adults

- Fuel Economy: Vehicle must have a fuel economy (city) of at least 17 miles per gallon and a fuel economy (highway) of at least 24 miles per gallon

- Warranty: Vehicle must have warranty of at least 3yr / 36,000 miles. **Sample**

Page 14: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

14

Screened Out COAs(1 of 2)

- Chrysler Pacifica: Fails screening criteria because its leg room is only 39 inches, its city fuel economy is only 16 mpg, its highway fuel economy is only 23 mpg, and only seats five adults

- Dodge Caravan: Fails screening criteria because it has a vehicle safety rating of only four stars and has a warranty of only 2yr / 24,000 miles.

- Mercury Monterey: Fails screening criteria because the cost is $28,600, it has a vehicle safety rating of only four stars, its head room is only 38 inches, its city fuel economy is only 16 mpg, and its highway fuel economy is only 20 mpg

Page 15: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

15

Screened Out COAs(2 of 2)

- Nissan Quest: Fails screening criteria because the cost is $28,000, it has a vehicle safety rating of only four stars, and it does not have the side curtain airbag safety system

- Pontiac Montana: Fails screening criteria because it has a

vehicle safety rating of only four stars and does not possess the side curtain airbag safety system

**Sample**

Page 16: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

16

Surviving COAs

Chrysler Town & Country

Honda Odyssey Ford Freestyle

**Sample**

Page 17: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

17

Evaluation Criteria(1 of 7)

- Short Title: Cost

- Definition: the maximum total cost of each vehicle before taxes

- Unit of Measure: US Dollars

- Benchmark: $26,000

- Formula: ≤ $26,000 is an advantage; > $26,000 is a disadvantage; less is better

**Sample**

Page 18: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

18

Evaluation Criteria(2 of 7)

- Short Title: Leg Room

- Definition: The distance from the farthest frontal seat position of the vehicle to the foot pedals and floorboards

- Unit of Measure: Inches

- Benchmark: 41 inches

- Formula: ≥ 41 inches is an advantage; < 41 inches is a disadvantage; more is better

**Sample**

Page 19: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

24

Priority of Criteria1. Cost

2. Leg Room

3. Head Room

4. Fuel Economy (City)

5. Fuel Economy (Highway)

6. Cargo Space

7. Luggage Space

**Sample**

Page 20: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

25

Analysis of Honda Odyssey

Advantages:Cost - $25,000Leg Room - 42 inchesHead Room - 41 inchesFuel Economy (City) - 19 mpgCargo Space - 147 cubic feetLuggage Space - 38 cubic feet

Disadvantages:Fuel Economy (Highway) - 24 mpg

Benchmark:≤ $26,000≥ 41 inches≥ 40 inches≥ 19 mpg≥ 125 cubic feet≥ 27 cubic feet

≥ 26 mpg

**Sample**

Page 21: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

28

Comparison of COAsEvaluation Criteria

(Advantage Formula)Cost

(≤ $26,000)Odyssey($25,000) > Town & Country

($25,500) > Freestyle($26,500)

Leg Room(≥ 41 inches)

Odyssey(42 inches) > Town & Country

(40 inches) = Freestyle(40 inches)

Head Room(≥ 40 inches)

Odyssey(41 inches) > Town & Country

(40 inches) > Freestyle(39 inches)

Fuel Economy (City)(≥ 19 mpg)

Freestyle(21 mpg) > Town & Country

(20 mpg) > Odyssey(19 mpg)

Fuel Economy (Highway)(≥ 26 mpg)

Freestyle(27 mpg) = Town & Country

(27 mpg) > Odyssey(24 mpg)

Cargo Space(≥ 125 cubic feet)

Town & Country(166 cubic feet) > Odyssey

(147 cubic feet) > Freestyle(85 cubic feet)

Luggage Space(≥ 27 cubic feet)

Odyssey(38 cubic feet) > Town & Country

(26 cubic feet) > Freestyle(18 cubic feet)

Courses of Action (Raw Data)

**Sample**

Page 22: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

29

ConclusionThe Honda Odyssey (LX) Midsize Minivan is the best vehicle to purchase for a second vehicle. It does not have the best city or highway fuel economy or the most cargo space, but it offers the most favorable mix of the other criteria. It is the least expensive, the most important criteria, and has the most front leg room and front head room. It also has the best luggage capacity.

**Sample**

Page 23: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

30

RecommendationThe Honda Odyssey (LX) midsize minivan is the best vehicle to purchase

**Sample**

Page 24: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

31

Raw Data Matrix

Cost1000's

SafetyRating

Side Airbag

Seating Leg Room

Head Room

FuelCity

Fuel Highway

Warranty CargoSpace

LuggageSpace

Honda Odyssey 25 5 Yes 6 42 41 19 24 3 yr 147 38Chysler

Town & Country 25.5 5 Yes 6 40 40 20 27 3 yr 166 26

Ford Freestyle 26.5 5 Yes 6 40 39 21 27 3 yr 85 18

Chrysler Pacifica 27 5 Yes 5 39 39 16 23 3 yr 85 18

Dodge Caravan 26.5 4 Yes 6 41 39 18 25 2 yr 125 24Mercury

Monterey 28.6 4 Yes 6 40 38 16 20 3 yr 140 30

Nissan Quest 28 4 No 6 41 39 20 25 3 yr 115 26

Pontiac Montana 27 4 No 6 42 40 19 24 3 yr 170 26

Courses Of ActionCriteria

**Sample**

Page 25: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

32

Weighting of Criteria(1 of 2)

Cost > Leg Room = Head Room > Fuel Economy (City) = Fuel Economy (Highway) > Cargo Space > Luggage Space

**Sample**

Page 26: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

33

Weighting of Criteria(2 of 2)

- Cost is slightly favored over leg room and head room- Cost is favored over fuel economy (city) and fuel economy (highway)- Cost is strongly favored over cargo space and luggage space- Leg room and head room are equal- Leg room and head room are slightly favored over fuel economy (city) and fuel economy (highway)- Leg room and head room are strongly favored over cargo space and luggage space- Fuel economy (city) and fuel economy (highway) are equal- Fuel economy (city) and fuel economy (highway) are favored over cargo

space- Fuel economy (city) and fuel economy (highway) are strongly favored over

luggage space

- Cargo space is slightly favored over luggage space

**Sample**

Page 27: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

34

Decision Matrix(1 of 2)

**Sample**

Page 28: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

35

Decision Matrix(2 of 2)

**Sample**

Page 29: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

36

Sensitivity Analysis

**Sample**

Page 30: Decision Brief Intro, Example, And PE(1)

AGCCCUNCLASSIFIED

                             

37

Sensitivity Analysis

**Sample**