ACSEL2015

Bringing Safety To Life

December, 2nd 2015

University Indonesia

abstract title:

Eko Sukti Wibowo

AUTHOR

Henry V. Matakupan

AUTHOR

Muhyi Fitrahanefi

AUTHOR

Nugroho A. Andika

AUTHOR

Kamarrudin

AUTHOR

Analysis of The 8 Live Saving Rules (LSR) Program ApplicationTo Reduce Major Accident Rate in PT "X" in 2009 -2014

Studied by Reasoned Action Theory

Company “X” Total Recordable Rate (TRR)

IN THE PAST

Company “X” has made significant improvements in reducing TRR

the number of significant incidents has not improved.HOWEVER,

0.10

0.04

WHY LIFE SAVING RULES

1 FATALITY CASEJUNE 2012

1 FATALITY CASEMARCH 2013

SERIOUS NEAR MISSNOVEMBER2012

1 FATALITY CASEJUNE 2013

Life Saving Rules focus on potentially high-hazard activities

Overview 8 Life Saving Rules

There is a set of minimum requirements for each Life Saving Rule

DO

ASSESS

ADJUSTPLAN

The Safe Work Cycle

LSR IMPLEMENTATION

The number of TRR

decreased to 0.05

after a year implementation

TO ACHIEVE

better TRR the Top

Management evaluated

the LSR program

application by using

THEORY REASONED ACTION

The assessment result shows the programnot running optimal was due to lack offield personnel’s motivation toparticipate on LSR Field VerificationProgram.

RESEARCH_TRA.pptxRESEARCH_TRA.pptx

activities to be verified

• 8 LSR subjects• Out of LSR subjects

(PTW Only)• Exposed to

higher risk/• Historically

exposed to incident/ unsafe situation

field verification process

• Determine activity related to LSR

• Assign qualified person• Decide to select more

than one related LSR activities

• 10% of LSR related activities (at least 1 item/month/LSR)

• To follow up LSR Field Verification result

data collection & analysis

• Qualified person- Verify- Record- submit

• HSE Advisor/Line Management- compile- analyze

• PerformanceMeasurement, monitor:- verification

performance (e.g: data

of verification submitter, etc)

- gaps for further improvement

- trending over time)

management review

• Review BusinessProcess &Performanceperiodically

• Get improvementfeedback

non-conformance handling

Site Line Management • Review & evaluate

the compiled data- Key learning- Current practices effectiveness

- Key performance measurement

• Investigate –deficiencies/non-conformance

deficiencies

Deficiencies in weekly basis

commits to eliminate potential all significant and high-risk incidents

Governing Procedures

0.020.10 0.05

DECEMBER 2014

BEST TRR THAT EVER ACHIEVED BY PT. “X”

TRR 2013

Total Recordable RateUntil End Of December 2012

TRR 2012

Total Recordable RateUntil End Of December 2012