Debra Ellison RS, Regional Epidemiologist Suzanne Wilson, MPH, Food & Waterborne Disease...
-
Upload
morgan-york -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Debra Ellison RS, Regional Epidemiologist Suzanne Wilson, MPH, Food & Waterborne Disease...
Debra Ellison RS, Debra Ellison RS,
Regional EpidemiologistRegional Epidemiologist
Suzanne Wilson, MPH, Suzanne Wilson, MPH,
Food & Waterborne Disease EpidemiologistFood & Waterborne Disease Epidemiologist1
Discuss the epidemiology of the Discuss the epidemiology of the outbreakoutbreak
Discuss the environmental Discuss the environmental assessment assessment
Discuss the steps taken during the Discuss the steps taken during the investigationinvestigation
Discuss the statistics and outcome of Discuss the statistics and outcome of the investigationthe investigation
2
13 Steps to an Outbreak13 Steps to an Outbreak
Step 1: Prepare for field work. Step 1: Prepare for field work.
Step 2: Establish the existence of an Step 2: Establish the existence of an
outbreak outbreak
Step 3: Verify the diagnosisStep 3: Verify the diagnosis
Step 4: Construct a working case definition Step 4: Construct a working case definition Step 5: Find cases systematically and Step 5: Find cases systematically and
record informationrecord information Step 6: Perform descriptive epidemiology Step 6: Perform descriptive epidemiology
3
Step 7: Develop hypotheses. Step 7: Develop hypotheses.
Step 8: Evaluate hypotheses Step 8: Evaluate hypotheses
epidemiologically. epidemiologically. Step 9: As necessary, reconsider, refine and Step 9: As necessary, reconsider, refine and
re-evaluate hypothesesre-evaluate hypotheses Step 10: Compare and reconcile with Step 10: Compare and reconcile with
laboratory and/or environmental studies laboratory and/or environmental studies
Step 11: Implement control and prevention Step 11: Implement control and prevention
measuresmeasures. .
Step 12: Initiate or maintain surveillance Step 12: Initiate or maintain surveillance
Step 13: Communicate findings.Step 13: Communicate findings. 4
Background Background Salmonella enteritidisSalmonella enteritidis
Approximately 40,000 Approximately 40,000 Salmonella Salmonella human clinical isolates each yearhuman clinical isolates each year
>2500 serotypes of>2500 serotypes of Salmonella Salmonella Enteritidis is the 2Enteritidis is the 2ndnd most common most common
serotype of serotype of SalmonellaSalmonella reported to reported to CDCCDC
Outbreaks historically associated Outbreaks historically associated with eggs and poultry productswith eggs and poultry products
5
June 12 – 5 cases recognized in 2 June 12 – 5 cases recognized in 2 countiescounties
June 15-20 – Cases continueJune 15-20 – Cases continue 4 cases noted by DIDE and CAMC ICP4 cases noted by DIDE and CAMC ICP
Cases were from different countiesCases were from different counties June 23-27 - The work beginsJune 23-27 - The work begins
A total of 18 cases of A total of 18 cases of SalmonellaSalmonella identified in 6 countiesidentified in 6 counties
6
Establish the existence of Establish the existence of an outbreakan outbreak
General definition: General definition: number of cases over number of cases over and above the expected number in a given and above the expected number in a given timeframetimeframe
Foodborne disease outbreak Foodborne disease outbreak is defined is defined as two or more persons who experience a as two or more persons who experience a similar illness after ingestion of a common similar illness after ingestion of a common food. Please note two exceptions: one case food. Please note two exceptions: one case of botulism or chemical poisoning of botulism or chemical poisoning constitutes an outbreak.constitutes an outbreak.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Jan-07
Feb-07
Mar-07
Apr-07
May-07
Jun-07
Jul-0
7
Aug-07
Sep-07
Oct-07
Nov-07
Dec-07
Jan-08
Feb-08
Mar-08
Apr-08
May-08
Jun-08
Jul-0
8
Aug-08
Sep-08
Oct-08
Nov-08
Dec-08
Jan-09
Feb-09
Mar-09
Apr-09
May-09
Jun-09
Jul-0
9
Tota
l Num
ber
of C
ases
Month of Onset
Cases of Salmonellosis Reported from January 2007 to July 2009, Region II, West Virginia
14
Find cases systematically and Find cases systematically and develop a line listingdevelop a line listing
WVEDSS can be helpfulWVEDSS can be helpful All All SalmonellaSalmonella cases entered on or after cases entered on or after
May 25, 2009 were searched and placed in May 25, 2009 were searched and placed in Excel spreadsheetExcel spreadsheet
15
Construct a working case Construct a working case definitiondefinition
SuspectSuspect – Case of Salmonellosis with onset – Case of Salmonellosis with onset after May 25, 2009 in Logan, Cabell, Wayne, after May 25, 2009 in Logan, Cabell, Wayne, Lincoln, Boone, or Putnam counties for which Lincoln, Boone, or Putnam counties for which PFGE testing is pending.PFGE testing is pending.
ConfirmedConfirmed - Case of laboratory confirmed - Case of laboratory confirmed Salmonella Enteritidis Salmonella Enteritidis with onset of illness with onset of illness after May 25, 2009 AND PFGE pattern Xba- after May 25, 2009 AND PFGE pattern Xba- JEGX01.wv001 and Bln- JEGA26.wv001JEGX01.wv001 and Bln- JEGA26.wv001
ProbableProbable – Case of diarrheal illness with – Case of diarrheal illness with onset after May 25, 2009 and is onset after May 25, 2009 and is epidemiologically linked to a confirmed caseepidemiologically linked to a confirmed case 16
It’s Established … now It’s Established … now the issuesthe issues
Verify the diagnosisVerify the diagnosis - - Salmonella Salmonella enteriditisenteriditis Issues Issues
the most common subtype in WVthe most common subtype in WV Multiple countiesMultiple counties Multiple interview techniquesMultiple interview techniques Patient recallPatient recall 2 deaths2 deaths No “common” risk factorsNo “common” risk factors
17
No “common” risk No “common” risk factors until…factors until…
Restaurant X starts to appear in the Restaurant X starts to appear in the case reports case reports
IssuesIssues Chain restaurant – not all from the same Chain restaurant – not all from the same
locationlocation Onset dates are random when looked at as Onset dates are random when looked at as
wholewhole However when looked at by location…However when looked at by location…
18
Location of Cases and Identified Restaurants
Purple – ate at Wayne location
Green – ate at Eleanor location
Yellow- ate at Chapmanville location
Red - Restaurant
Blue - ate at Danville location
White – cases that did not indicate eating at any restaurant location
19
Onset Dates by Onset Dates by Restaurant X Location Restaurant X Location
(N=13)(N=13)Onset Date
Logan Putnam
Wayne Boone
5/6/09 1
5/25/09 1
5/26/09 1
5/27/09 1
5/29/09 1
6/1/09 1
6/5/09 2
6/8/09 1
6/10/09 2
6/11/09 1
7/3/09 120
Now What?Now What?
21
Shotgun questionnaireShotgun questionnaire
Administered to 7 casesAdministered to 7 cases Included general food informationIncluded general food information Included eating and shopping Included eating and shopping
venuesvenues Restaurant typesRestaurant types
22
Attack rates from Shotgun Attack rates from Shotgun Questionnaires (N=7) Questionnaires (N=7)
Exposure Attack Rate (%)
Any restaurant 100
Restaurant X 86
Restaurant Y 43
Restaurant Z 43
23
Various Restaurants
Attack rate = # with exposure / # total responses
Exposure Attack Rate (%)
Bacon 76
Eggs 71
Lunchmeat 57
Biscuit 43
Hamburger 43
Hot dogs 43
Sausage 43
24
Attack rates from Shotgun Attack rates from Shotgun Questionnaires (N=7) Questionnaires (N=7)
Various Food Items
Attack rate = # with exposure / # total responses
The Plan – Next StepsThe Plan – Next Steps
Additional lab testingAdditional lab testing MLVA analysis at CDCMLVA analysis at CDC
Further analytic studyFurther analytic study Case control and cohort studiesCase control and cohort studies
Conduct environmental risk Conduct environmental risk assessmentsassessments
25
The InvestigationThe Investigation(Methods/Results)(Methods/Results)
A restaurant case control study was A restaurant case control study was undertaken using “friend controls”. undertaken using “friend controls”.
14 cases and 34 controls were 14 cases and 34 controls were includedincluded
Questioned about eating at 11 Questioned about eating at 11 different area restaurantsdifferent area restaurants
Restaurant X had an odds ratio of 5.92 Restaurant X had an odds ratio of 5.92 (CI 1.39-25.30, p<0.01)(CI 1.39-25.30, p<0.01)
26
The InvestigationThe Investigation(Methods)(Methods)
Anyone responding “yes” to Anyone responding “yes” to Restaurant X was enrolled in cohort Restaurant X was enrolled in cohort to implicate food itemsto implicate food items
Total of 11 cases and 13 controlsTotal of 11 cases and 13 controls Focus on breakfast itemsFocus on breakfast items
27
Food Cohort ResultsFood Cohort ResultsFood Item Odds Ratio Confidenc
e Intervalp value Number
of Cases
Sausage 5.83 1.0-34.6 0.05 7
Gravy 6.86 0.6-74.2 0.11 4
Potato 2.67 0.2-34.2 0.26 2
Biscuit 2.29 0.4-12.7 0.30 8
Egg 1.5 0.3-7.8 0.47 7
Bacon 1.33 0.3-6.8 0.53 5
28
Laboratory ResultsLaboratory Results
PFGE analysis (OLS)PFGE analysis (OLS) All 19 isolates are 2 enzyme matchAll 19 isolates are 2 enzyme match
MLVA analysis (CDC) MLVA analysis (CDC) 2 related patterns2 related patterns corresponded to location of Restaurant corresponded to location of Restaurant
X exposureX exposure
29
Outbreak TimelineOutbreak Timeline
30
Outbreak TimelineOutbreak Timeline
31
Outbreak TimelineOutbreak Timeline
32
Outbreak TimelineOutbreak Timeline
33
Age Distribution Age Distribution
34
General Statistics General Statistics (21 cases)(21 cases)
Gender – 10 females (48%) 11 males Gender – 10 females (48%) 11 males (52%)(52%)
Hospitalized – 9 cases (45%)Hospitalized – 9 cases (45%) Deaths – 2Deaths – 2 Underlying Medical Condition – 5 Underlying Medical Condition – 5
cases (25%)cases (25%)
35
Implement control and Implement control and prevention measuresprevention measures
What control measures can be What control measures can be implemented?implemented?
36
Risk Assessment vs. Risk Assessment vs. InspectionInspection
InspectionsInspections Evaluate food workers' practices Evaluate food workers' practices
Hand hygieneHand hygiene Evaluate food processesEvaluate food processes
Storage, temperature control etc.Storage, temperature control etc.
Risk AssessmentRisk Assessment Focuses detailed observations on a food Focuses detailed observations on a food
itemitem ““Trailer to Trash”Trailer to Trash”
37
Restaurant X locations, Restaurant X locations, 4 main locations all in different counties 4 main locations all in different counties
EH staff from each county health EH staff from each county health department conducted an inspection of department conducted an inspection of each facility each facility
Multiple opportunities for cross Multiple opportunities for cross contamination foundcontamination found problems with cold holding problems with cold holding inadequate cooking temperatures inadequate cooking temperatures no temperature checksno temperature checks no ill food handlers at any of the facilities no ill food handlers at any of the facilities 38
Full cooperation from all 4 restaurant X Full cooperation from all 4 restaurant X locations owners/managers and CEO of locations owners/managers and CEO of ChainChain
product samples taken from the 4 locations product samples taken from the 4 locations tested negative for Salmonella at OLStested negative for Salmonella at OLS Lot numbers were a problemLot numbers were a problem
US Food Service distributor of sausageUS Food Service distributor of sausage was unable to provide detailed information as was unable to provide detailed information as
to the lot #s of sausage received at each to the lot #s of sausage received at each location. location.
Restaurant XRestaurant X
39
In the endIn the end
21 cases21 cases 19 confirmed, 2 probable19 confirmed, 2 probable 2 deaths associated with 2 deaths associated with SalmonellaSalmonella
Spanned 7 countiesSpanned 7 counties Onset dates ranged 5/26 to 7/3Onset dates ranged 5/26 to 7/3 Sample testing – provided negative Sample testing – provided negative
results on suspect foodresults on suspect food 4 locations were inspected4 locations were inspected
40
Counties involved:Counties involved:
Logan (8 cases)Logan (8 cases) Putnam (4 cases)Putnam (4 cases) Cabell (2 cases)Cabell (2 cases) Boone (1 case)Boone (1 case) Wayne (4 cases)Wayne (4 cases) Lincoln (1 case )Lincoln (1 case ) Fayette (1 case)Fayette (1 case)
41
LimitationsLimitations Number of controls in case-control studyNumber of controls in case-control study Unable to obtain lot numbers of sausageUnable to obtain lot numbers of sausage Implicated lot(s) not available for testingImplicated lot(s) not available for testing No positive sample obtained-no USDA No positive sample obtained-no USDA
tracebacktraceback Commonality of PFGE pattern prevented Commonality of PFGE pattern prevented
identification of cases in other statesidentification of cases in other states Incomplete case detectionIncomplete case detection Resource limitationsResource limitations
42
ConclusionsConclusions
Lot(s) of sausage contaminated with Lot(s) of sausage contaminated with SalmonellaSalmonella delivered to the 4 delivered to the 4 locationslocations
Inadequate cooking of sausage Inadequate cooking of sausage Cross contaminationCross contamination
43
Boone County Health DepartmentBoone County Health Department
Julie Miller Julie Miller
Sandra GilesSandra Giles
Cabell County Health DepartmentCabell County Health Department
Kim LockwoodKim Lockwood
Fayette County Health Fayette County Health DepartmentDepartment
Nora SmithNora Smith
Logan County Health DepartmentLogan County Health Department
Sherry AdamsSherry Adams
Steve Browning Steve Browning
Putnam County Health Putnam County Health DepartmentDepartment
Barbara KoblinskyBarbara Koblinsky
Wayne County Health Wayne County Health DepartmentDepartment
Melissa SpenceMelissa Spence
Dave FarleyDave Farley
44
WVDHHR-Office of Epidemiology WVDHHR-Office of Epidemiology & Prevention Services& Prevention Services
Loretta HaddyLoretta HaddyDanae BixlerDanae BixlerMaria del RosarioMaria del RosarioLillie ClayLillie ClayAlana HudsonAlana HudsonRachel RadcliffeRachel Radcliffe
WVDHHR-Office of Laboratory WVDHHR-Office of Laboratory ServicesServices
Christi ClarkChristi ClarkMegan YoungMegan Young
WVDHHR-WVDHHR-Office of Office of Environmental Health ServicesEnvironmental Health Services
Ryan HarbisonRyan Harbison
Jessica DouglasJessica Douglas
Linda WhaleyLinda Whaley
QuestionsQuestions
45