Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

23
Give fluids! Dr David Inwald Consultant in PICU St Mary’s Hospital and CATS

description

Dr David Inwald's presentation at Meningitis Research Foundation's 2013 conference, Meningitis and Septicaemia in Children and Adults

Transcript of Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Page 1: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Give fluids!

Dr David Inwald

Consultant in PICU

St Mary’s Hospital and CATS

Page 2: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Two pathophysiological reasons to give fluids in septic shock

• Fluid is in the wrong place

• The pump is not working

Page 3: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Increased capillary permeability

Page 4: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Sepsis

Warm shockHigh CO

vasodilation

Cold shockLow CO

vasoconstriction

Dysregulation of vascular tone

Page 5: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Depression of myocardial contractility

Page 6: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Shock

• A clinical syndrome of inadequate tissue perfusion

• DO2 < VO2

Page 7: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Increasing DO2

Page 8: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Therapeutic implications

GIVE FLUIDS

Page 9: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Frank-Starling curve

fluids

inotropes

Page 10: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

How much fluid?

Page 11: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Brierley J et al, Crit Care Med 2009; 37:666–688

Up to and over 60 ml/kg by

15 minutes

Page 12: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Early reversal of shockEarly reversal of shockEvery hour without resuscitation and Every hour without resuscitation and

restoration of CRT < 2 s and normal BP restoration of CRT < 2 s and normal BP increases mortality by 40%!increases mortality by 40%!

Han YY et al Pediatrics. 2003;112:793-9

1 Hour 2 Hours 3 hours

10987654321

Page 13: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Fluid resuscitation of hypovolemic shock: acute medicine's great triumph for

children

Carcillo JA and Tasker RC, ICM 2006;32:958-61

Page 14: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis
Page 15: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Time (h)

Mor

talit

y

Page 16: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

FEAST management

• C - Circulation

Page 17: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Developed world management

• A - Airway

• B - Breathing

• C - Circulation…

Page 18: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Other therapies?• Haemofiltration• ECMO• Modulators of coagulation

• rh-APC• Protein C• Protein S• AT III• r-tPA

• Anti-endotoxin strategies• Polymixin• Anti-endotoxin antibodies (HA-1A)• rBPI21

• Prostacyclin

Page 19: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

Therapeutic implications

GIVE FLUIDS

Page 20: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis
Page 21: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis
Page 23: Debate on aggressive vs restricted fluid resuscitation in childhood sepsis

GIVE FLUIDS