Debate Flow: UoO DM vs Washburn AD

7/30/2019 Debate Flow: UoO DM vs Washburn AD

1/26

LOC MGC MOC

Prior question on

procedural level, impact to

compettiive equitiy.

Use and abuse of fiat, no

access to critic. Impact

calculous proves abuse

story

2.Fiat means no access to K

or DA rounds, abuse in

debate round.


2/26

LOR PMR


3/26

LOC MGC MOC

A) specifiy judging voting

We meet, rulings normal

means

Specify which judges vote

for affirmative case, no

meet. Key to limits to

identifying ground. Cant

pic out of judges, specifity

is needed for this.

C) Ground: Ospec worse

1.Can pic out of judges

a. kill ground, prep time is

skewed advantages to judges

choosed. Crushes

predictability

A. Pic ground solves back,

important for the LOC.

LOC is most important

speech unique in this

situation

D) erre out of negative

strategy, LOC is only way to

grant strategies

not overspecification and

rooted in literature basis,

with the critic of decisions.

2. MG offense is bad

A2 predictability:

1.GROUnd checks this

back, even if you crush

predictability you would

get ground with new

counterplan. Cant get

ofense without it. Best

internal link to limite

debate.

3.Limits most is best

No limits, any nuimber of

combination of judges and

advantages

More limiting checks thisback and run politics link

to solve back for the

affirmative.

4. Aff gets to challenge

framework, and then

negative needs to win

Aff explosion of ground is

worse than negative

implosion of ground.


4/26

POIs always check

a.can choose to not

answer this question,

Voting issue for competing

interpretation

Reasonability, win clear in

round abuse

No standards for why this

is true, no compete with

competitng interpretationswhich forces you to look at

entire standards debate.

Ground is true, cant pic

out of anything under aff

interpretation and no

access to DA

Concede that you erre

negative on theory, LOC is

the most important speech.

MOC arguments are impact

turned by the PMR

No offense to limits

answered better.

Aff chooses the framwork,

and extrapolate use of fiat

to spike out of critic.

No counter interpretation

or we meet with normal

means

2.Outwigh on

interpretation, force you to

look at every specific

standards.

Fiat proves abuse:!

1.Reason why they dont

access to critic. Specify,

get pic ground and

uniqueness ground.


5/26

2.Guaruntees links to

advnatages and then

negative has to guess what

are the uniqueness and

links to DAs

Prior question to

affirmative

1.Sets framework and

thesis for the debate

round.


6/26

LOR PMR

Normal means is

predictable ground,

literature allows negative

to choose.

Infinite ground with

overspecifiying, negative

always loses.

Can choose with the aff

framework with the

infinite ground, aff would

choose their DA, CP andruling and then

affirmative would chose

the best one jacking them

from the best arguments

negative would walys

lose

1.Ground based, meaning

that this is the only

predictable ground.

Negative should be able

to choose which judges

do what with literature.

lITERATURE means that

negative gets access to

their arguments with this.

2. No limits, infinite

combination of judges.

Negative always gets

access to CP and DA

ground with this.

Explode limits with

affirmative specifiyin,g

infinite regression

offense with ground and

limits arguments

3. Negative gets fiat in

this interpretaion,

meaning negative interp

is stupid.

CP ground is still

eliminated when aff

chooses


7/26

Give specific in roundabuse, like voting on a

potential DA

Negative still gets fiat in

both interpretation. No

reason why this

argument matters.


8/26

PMC LOC MGC

Plan: US Supreme Court rule inf

avor of rodney gant in gant v

arizona

Ruling is normal means and

ruled on grounds of 4th

ammendment

Background:

1.Issue is of credible threat for

cops to search your cars,

privacy is not exiplicit meaning

that there is nothing preventing

searches

ADV:

A) 4th amendment is battled

now, right to privacy is always

battled

B) abandon rights of privacy is

a tipping point where it is

abandonedd

C) Ruling in favor of this means

that violent and credible threats

is eliminated

Racism exists because of

state, uniqueness cuts in

direction of the affirmative,

make state do less step in

right direction

D) Justifies racial profiling of

individuals which means that

this is only way that people can

do racial profililing and set legal

precident

E) Racism causes

dehumanizations, put someoneas the other. Excludes an entire

group based on how they are

born over race

2.Leads to property and

structural dehumanization, no

agency or society


9/26

F) creates a teleological

precedent where people cant be

arbitrarily killed, this is a

slippery slope to killing them

No uniquenss without a

pragmatic step

G) Privacy is the mandatory

starting point to tyranny anddictatership and normalizes

violence and no value to life

Solvency of the case, onlyway to solve racism without

state solvency and aciton.

H) Solvency: Guaruntee right to

privacy and mandates right of

privacy above all else before

someone's right to person.

Pragmatism is only way to

stolve


10/26

MOC LOR PMR


11/26


12/26


13/26

LOC MGC MOC

Fiat allows education,

understand how it acts.

B.better policy makers later

on C.better revolutionaries,

udnerstanding workings of

the state and see cracks and

fissuers.

Movement becomes

corrupted without state, no

knoweldge of action.

Fiat allows roleplaying,

representative democracy

Framework:

No eliminate rep systems, fiat

is best way to change.

1.Debate should be open to

a liberatory narratives

Cross apply, state is key in

squo, genocide is inevitable

without the state. Aff solves a

better scenario

1.Endorsement grants

legitimacy meaning that It is

a prior question

2.Bad method leads to bad

policy, Iraq proves

3.Symbolism frames

political violence, 9/11

proves

4.Ontology is a prior

question, cant seprate plan

from ontological

perspective

Links:

1.Aff imagines the existenceof the big other

Imagine state as a good

actor, utilization of fiat

meaning that we pretend to

be the supreme court


14/26

2.Supreme court is bad,

exclusive legalistic

language that excludes

people.

3.Imagine value to life onlyfrom the lens of the state

and supreme court

Without state, coercion is farworse. Biggest weapons

detirmines who does what

4. legal system is a facist

state power, invisible and

more exclusive key

manifistation of state power

and decides state norms

Only system with diplomacy,

stop war

5.Aff assumes that the state

is the only thing that can actto solve racism,

demobalizes people

because we assume that the

state has dealth with the

problem because the

supreme court has already

solved it

Fiat is good, debate is an

activity to discuss utility of

government to solve

movements. Ruling of

decision allows success point

allows new micrpolitics

No movement withoiut state

movement, no solvency

without the state of the

affirmativeImpacts:

1.Agency to paternal

figureheads which guts our

agency, we need to

recognize that we have

agency to frame external

philosophies. Triggers

passivity.

Fiat distance self from

argument, totalizing view of

the state

2.20th century atrocitiy

justified by biopolitical

imagination and iodea of an

unhuman iother to jsutify

violence and realism,

creation of an enemy that

we cant see but still

endlessly attack

State is inevtibale, only

prevent weapons is state.

State has launch codes only

learn how to stop state

without it


15/26

3. Justify and create real

violence, mobalize

populations for violence

and extirmination, 360

bombs dropped in bagdad

in an hour because we dontchallnege power.

4. neg frameowrk only for

value to life, do not privlage

ethical systems that divest

agency

State allows specalization,

people do different things

over hunter gathering. Allows

value to life.

5. Ecocide is inevitable,

pursuit of resources.

Supremem court regulates

resources, demobalizes us

from checking caopitalsim

Govenrment solve capitalism

stop ecodestruction and

technology

6. Biodiversity is necessary

for solving extinction

7. Demarcates the

bounderies of our

existnece, regulation of free

speech in zones.

Free speech zones is GOP

have militia outside doors

stop any speech

8. Big other preserves itself

through this, physicalrestraint on our agency

Alt:

Illegitimte ground, uniquness

for critical argument. Articifial

uniqueness and arbitary

inflation of impact arguments

Vote Negative to imagine

the big other does not exist

Solve:


16/26

1.Requires voting negative,

aff assumes supreme court

is a good actor. Severence,

moots 1nc the most

important speech.

2.Signifies a key political

stance and this privaleges

idea through the ballot.

3.Affirmation of critic itself,

metaforic condensation

rearangment, things we say

and way that we say them

have transformative value.

4.Demistify big other

because we imagine the big

other does not exist.


17/26

LOR PMR


18/26


19/26

LOC MGC MOC

State is inevitabel:

A. states break down and

reofrm

b. specalize create

governemnt systems

c.Survive, people rely on

government and others to

survive state for efficiency is

inevitable

Good:

A.keep captialism from killing

people through reuglationB. exploitation is inevitalbe

witohut state, makes

indentured servants are

illegal

C. strong destroy week in aff

framework, US military rolls

over world, no more state

Solve Eco:

1.Build tech to decrease C02,

only way to do it is state

power

Causes extinction, deserts

with temp rises


20/26

LOR PMR


21/26

LOC MGC MOC


22/26

LOR PMR


23/26

LOC MGC MOC


24/26

LOR PMR


25/26

1AC 1NC 2AC

i/l suck ass

impacts need terminalization

explain why drug plan bad


26/26

2NC

Debate Flow: UoO DM vs Washburn AD

Documents

Transcript of Debate Flow: UoO DM vs Washburn AD