Dcc roadshow dundee_rb
-
Upload
jisc-funded-kaptur-project -
Category
Education
-
view
120 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Dcc roadshow dundee_rb
Developing a Research Data
Management Policy
The Glasgow School of Art in conjunction with KAPTUR
Dr Robin Burgess
5th December 2012
Presentation Context
• Introduce the KAPTUR project
• Highlight policy development at GSA
• Comment on the issues and lessons learnt
so far
• Give details of the next steps in
development
KAPTUR
• Objective is to discover, create and pilot a
sectoral model of best practice in the
management of research data in the visual
arts.
Process • Requirements set by funding bodies
• Discussions amongst project team on the
issues of data management
• Approach developed to involve
researchers and other infrastructure
• Interviews
• Environmental assessment
Interview Process
• 4 researchers from each institute chosen,
from a broad range of disciplines
• Areas discussed - Terminology
- Role of the visual arts researcher
- Creation of visual arts research data
- Use/re-use of visual arts data
- Visual arts data in the longer term
Interview Findings • The term ‘research data’ was not helpful
• Researchers undertake multiple roles
• Creation of data altered
• Awareness of use and re-use present
• Importance of archiving raised
• Brought about the environmental
assessment report
Quote from a researcher: “… I am not sure what constitutes research
data… What is data? I mean, I talk to you about
my data as a researcher, but for the institution,
what does it consider data? Would it be
conference proceedings, would a performance
be data even if it was not recorded, sometimes I
don’t record my performances…”
Environmental Assessment • Little consensus in the visual arts on what
research data is
• Described as tangible, intangible, digital,
and physical
• Visual arts data is heterogeneous and
infinite, complex and complicated
• http://www.vads.ac.uk/kaptur/
Policy Development • Involvement of Kaptur
• Support from project partners
• Liaison with outside sources – e.g. the DCC
• Attendance at events – Conference in Leeds
• Involvement of interested parties at GSA – IT,
Information Services and the Library,
Research Office, Researchers
• Working Groups
Approach
• Context
• Definition of research data
• Policy statements
• Implementation methods
• Iterative process
• Discussions held
• Obtaining feedback
• Sign off and agreement
Comments
Issues:
• Building the support
network at GSA
• Extensive focus on the
REF process
• Changes in management
• Changes in staffing
• Expressing the
importance of policies
• EPSRC letter
Lessons Learnt:
• To be open and discuss
the work fully
• Identify the correct people
to engage with
• Formulate an action plan
for development
• Communicate
• Obtain by-in early on
Next Steps
Moving Forwards:
• Complete 2nd draft policy
document by 21st
December 2012
• Share with Head of
Information services
• Make relevant changes
and share with research
office
• February 2013, present to
research and knowledge
exchange committee
Additional Work:
• Present at an All Staff
meeting about Kaptur
• Educate the research
office on the importance
of the policy for bid
writing/funding
• Educate research staff
through workshops and
training
• Promotional work
• Conferences
What is Arts Research
Data?
What is arts research data?
What does it mean to you?
Research art design architecture
I’m going to tell you
What is arts research data?
We tried to find out
We asked various researchers
And this is what we found…
A-Z of research data…
•K is for KEEP
•A is for ARCHIVE
•P is for PROCESS
•T is for TEACHING
•U is for UNFINISHED
•R is for REPOSITORY
Acknowledgements • The project officers from partner institutes
• VADS
• JISC for sponsoring the project
• DCC
THANKYOU!
http://www.vads.ac.uk/kaptur/