Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Restart Performance ...Linda Dohrmann Linda Dohrmann Linda...

I

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station

Restart PerformanceIndicators

February 22, 2004

-NRC 0350 Restart Items

I\

FOR INFORMATION ONLY

%nristine LOpa - uavis-oesse reslark renormance inaicalors ior reoruary ze,. VaUU4 age 1

From: To: , ccalnrc.gov>, acst1 @nrc.gov>, ,, , , , Jer76nrc.gov>,, , dmartinl tfirstenergycorp.comr>,, , [email protected]>, ,, Date: 2/26/04 3:30PMSubject: Davis-Besse Restart Performance Indicators for February 22, 2004

(See attached file: PerfPkg_02_22_04.pdf)

Attached are the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Restart PerformanceIndicators for February 22, 2004.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Kathy419-321-8214

(See attached file: Pert_Pkg_02_22_04.pdf)

I,

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station

Restart Performance IndicatorsDistribution:

FENIOCExecufives:G. R. LeidichL. W. MyersJ. HaganM. BezillaF. von AhnJ. R. Fast

A-GO-19DB 3086A-GO- 14DB 3080A-GO-14A-GO-14

Davis-Besse Management:B. AllenR. W. SchrauderJ. J. PowersM. J. StevensC. A. PriceM. J. Ross

DB 2101DB 3086DB 3105DB 1025DB 3310DB 2103

Extemal strbution:C. A. Lipa, NRC Region III Chief, Branch 4C. S. Thomas, NRC Resident Inspector DB 4000

ROPMembers

FOR INFORMATION ONLY.

Restart Performance Indicators

Notes for Week ending February 22, 2004:

* No significant changed for this week

DATA DATE: 212004

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power StationRestart Performance IndicatorsBUILDING BLOCK &

NRC 0350 RESTART ACTIONSPerformance Indicator Owner Goal at Startup Current Status

Reactor Vessel Head Resolution(Idkcatom complte and no longer h Fe packge)- Reactor Vessel Head Replacement Project- Ucensing Issues Resolution

Containment Health Assurance(naoso complte and nol bnger hI e padke)- EOC Re-Inspections- Containment Focus Areas- Open Containment Health Restart CR Evaluations- Open Containment Health Restart CAs

System Health Assurance(Inkdcators cowmple and no longer h te package)- System Readiness Reviews- Latent Issues Reviews- BA Systems Outside CTMT - Inspections- Open Sys. Health Assurance Restart CR Evaluations- Open System Health Assurance Restart CAs

Program Compliance(Indcdaors complet and no longer hI te page)- Phase I Program Reviews- Phase 2 Program Reviews- Open Program Compliance Restart CR Evaluations- Open Program Compliance Restart CAs

Dave BakerKevin Ostrowski

Tim ChambersTim ChambersTim ChambersTim Chambers

Bob HovlandBob HovlandBob HoviandJim PowersJim Powers

Alien McAllisterAllen McAllisterJim PowersJim Powers

Project Scope CompleteZero to Compete

Zero to CompleteComplete Restart ActionsZero to CompleteZero to Complete

Zero to CompleteSpecified 5 CompleteZero to CompleteZero to CompleteZero to Complete

Zero to CompleteSpecified 7 CompleteZero to CompleteZero to Complete

CompleteComplete

CompleteCompleteCompleteComplete

CompleteCompleteCompleteCompleteComplete

CompleteCompleteCompleteComplete

Management & Human Performance(Indiao cwoM end no blge hI the package)- Management & Human Performance Restart Plan Mark Bezilla Zero Milestones to Complete Complete

Restart Rest Plan(IndIcators complete and no nger hI the pecage)- Restart Test Plan Tony Stallard Zero Restart Tests to Complete Complete

Restart Action Plan- Total Open Restart CR Evaluations* Total Open Restart Corrective Actions

Clark PriceClark Price

Zero to CompleteZero to Complete

14

DATA DATE: 2/2212004

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power StationRestart Performance IndicatorsRESTART & SUSTAINED

OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCEPerformance Indicators Owner Goal at Startup Current Status

Operational Readiness

- On-Line Corrective Maintenance Backlog

- Open Restart Modifications

- Open Temporary Modifications

- Open Procedure Change Requests

- Open Control Room Deficiencies

- Open Operator Work Arounds

- Open Restart Restraints (Mode 4/3)(Indicator complete and no lonrer In the package)

- Open Restart Restraints (Mode 2/1)

- Condition Report SRO Review

- Condition Report Evaluation

- Corrective Action Resolution

Mike Stevens

Jim Powers

Jim Powers

Linda Dohrmann

Kevin Ostrowski

Kevin Ostrowski

Kevin Ostrowski

Kevin Ostrowski

Linda Dohrmann

Linda Dohrmann

Linda Dohrmann

Less than 250

Zero to Complete

Zero Temporary Modifications

100 or Less

Zero to Correct

Zero to Correct

Zero to Complete

Zero to Complete

95% or better

Decreasing Trend

Decreasing Trend

98

0

1

13

11

8

0

20

87%

Decreasing

Leveled

Organizational Readiness

- Condition Reporting - Self-ldentified Rate

- Root Cause Evaluation Quality

- Condition Report Category Accuracy

- Individual Error Rate

- Program & Process Error Rate

- Engineering Quality

- Management Observations

Linda Dohrmann

Linda Dohrmann

Linda Dohrmann

Linda Dohnnann

Linda Dohrmann

Jim Powers

Mark Bezilla

85% or Better

90% or Better

90% or Better

< 0.45 per 10,000 hrs

< 0.50 per 10,000 hrs

Average Score of 1.0 or Less

90% or Better

87%

78%

94%

0.30

0.05

0.9

93%

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATIONRESTART ACTION PLAN

TOTAL OPEN RSRB RESTART CR EVALUATlONSIEAdd 1c3ose

0;0

IIz1 I

'U' t n n nDEFINMON

This indicator tracks the work off of Condition Reports (CRs) which have been classified as requiringevaluation prior to Restart by the Restart Station Review Board (RSRB).

The vertical bar indicator monitors the weekly addition and compIetion of these Restart CRs.These Restart Condition Reports are considered complete when they have been evaluated and appropriateCorrective Actions have been Initiated.

GOAL AT STARTUPZero to Complete

ANALYSIS/ SUMMARY

As of 2/2212004, the RSRB has reviewed 16,589 Condition Reports.- 6,651 Condition Reports have been classified as Restart

- 6,650 complete- 1lopen

- of the 6,651 Restart Condition Reports, 2,057 have been classified as 0350- 2,057 complete- 0 open

Effective August 4, 2003, the Restart Station Review Board discontinued the general augmented review andrestart classification of Condition Reports Initiated on or after August 1, 2003. The RSRB continues toreview new Condition Reports associated with NRC 0350 Restart Checklist Items.

Owner - C. PriceOversight - L. MyersRA-01

I

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATIONRESTART ACTION PLAN

TOTAL OPEN RSRB RESTART CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

600

300 _

200

100

gn i

55 1 4 N U7 U d 1 U I .1 1 11IS 4 'II ?1

DEFINMTONThis indicator tracks the work off of Corrective Actions (CAs) which have been classified as requiringcompletion prior to Restart by the Restart Station Review Board (RSRB).

The vertical bar Indicator monitors the weekly addition and closure of these Restart CAs. These Restart CAsare considered closed when the Corrective Action Is completed and updated as dlosed in the Condition ReportEvaluation & Status Tracking Program (CREST).

GOAL AT STARTUP

Zero to Complete

ANALYSIS! SUMMARY

As of 2/22/04, the RSRB has reviewed 116,494 Corrective Actions associated with Restart ConditionReports.

-. 7,521 Corrective Actions have been classified as Restart- 7,517 complete- 4 open

- of the 7,521 Restart Corrective Actions, 4.057 have been classified as 0350- 4,055 complete- 2 open

Owner - C. PriceRA-02 Oversight - L. Myers

2

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATIONOPERATIONAL READINESS

ON-LINE CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG

DEFINITION

Number of open on-line corrective maintenance work orders (WOs) as defined by INPO AP-928, WorkManagement Process Description is the repair and restoration of power production related equipment,components, or structures that have failed or are malfunctioning and are not performing their Intendedfunction.

GOAL AT STARTUP

Less than 250 open WOs

ANALYSIS! SUMMARY

During the week ending 2122104, 7 new corrective orders were initiated and 2 completed. Theorganizational focus remains on emergent work and preventive maintenance activities. The BacklogReduction Plan Is being implemented starting January 2004 to support achieving Corrective MaintenanceBacklog goals within the Operational Improvement Plan.

Owner - M. StevensMATH1 Analysis - L. Ring

3


OPEN TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS14 - d | Add Close -Actual

12

C8

I -

2 _ SS I am-

rEn ii n il iH, H Hu ni¶ a a l l aww 1* 1, S 88 1 08 *1 a*2 1 1 a1 a21 a 1 0aa* *0 1 1 1

DEFINITIONThis Indicator tracks the closeout of all open Temporary Modifications identified before Mode 2.

GOAL AT STARTUPZero Temporary Modifications

ANALYSIS! SUMMARYSignificant progress has been made in eliminating Temporary Modifications. Since July 2003, 20 TemporaryModifications have been eliminated leaving the I described below, which will remain open until shortly afterrestart.

Temporary Modification 03-0028 will remain installed until after restart and will be removed shorty after plantstartup during the next scheduled Auxiliary Boller Outage. This Temporary Modification is for Auxiliary BoilerFeedwater Control Valve AS1678 which was reassembled without a pusher plate and handwheel. AnAuxiliary Boiler outage is required to repair the valve and remove this Temporary Modification. This work cannot be completed prior to restart due to the need for station heating and establishing a vacuum. Once theStation is on line, the auxiliary boiler can be removed from service to repair AS1678 and remove TM 03-0028.

Owner - J. PowersEN-02 Analysis - B. Hoviand

4

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION

OPERATIONAL READINESS

OPEN PROCEDURE CHANGE REQUESTS

1200

1000

,, 800

c

400

200

0

II M Add =Close -Actual

Goal < 100

Ifins_ n &]j~&arrrinlsse11~_1s111s

120

100

80

ila60

40 E

20

0.I-, I - 1- I-, I- -I - 1-1- ]-I -1 -I - p-p-1-1 - t-j-p- I -I-, I -_�_ I - -L- I., t-

fI 1' I * I I * I~ t = I 1 I 5 I aI*- I a I 1-1 I I ~ 1 _' I *-I' I III 1-I I I! Ic . . . . . . . . . . .u~u~II~~uINII#~I2u~p1I~I~I~n~shII*IIIIuIIaII~I I I

I I

DEFINMONThis Indicator measures the number of Category / Priority I & 2 Procedure Change Requests (PCRs) whichare awaiting Incorporation Into Davis-Besse procedures. The term PCR Includes change requests Initiated asCondition Reports. The above count does not include category / priority 3 PCRs as these PCRs areenhancements not affecting procedure adequacy or quality, and categorylpriority 4 PCRs as these PCRs arerestrained by plant modifications, license amendment requests, etc. and cannot be closed until theserestraints are completed. A PCR Is considered completed when It Is Incorporated Into an effective procedureor when the PCR Is cancelled.

GOAL AT STARTUP

Restart goal is to be at less than 100 open targeted PCRs

ANALYSIS/ SUMMARYAs of February 22, 2004, there are 13 open Priority 1/2 change requests.

Owner- L. DohrmannAnalysis - D. MeckfesselPR-01

5

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION- . OPERATIONAL READINESS

OPEN CONTROL ROOM DEFICIENCIES12

sAdd Cose Actual

10

T)8SI\

2

07120 I7o1 7 12 10WI 2 121 W I6e14~ 5 M25 5 151 1 aI26 1112 ll 1111611122111M20 17 1xl1 -1226 Ill n 1 16 1 1 & I lasI 2" 529 Sf #14

6S1SS0 0 00 002 a0 02 00S * 6 0 0 S 0 a

a 0 0 I I 0 a 0-0aI0 a I :

EI I 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3$ 3 4 3 2 2 4 -4 4 4 4 _ 4_ _ 9 ititi4 1 1s 1 fit

DEFINITIONThe deficiencies In a Control Room component such as an Inoperable process Indicator, alarm function, orcomponent status light and those deficiencies that prevent the operation of an automatic control system orhand operated control switch. Deficiencies corrected in the field but awaiting testing for final closeout are notIncluded as an open control room deficiency.

GOAL AT STARTUPThe goal for Control Room deficiencies Is zero at restart.

ANALYSISI SUMMARYIit Date P t11104t03 30012115/03 30012V15103 30001/05/04 30002/09104 30002/13/04 3000213104 30002/13/04 60002/13/04 30002/13/04 30002/13/04 300

TED2/27/04MCOTEDTBDTEDTEDTEDTBDT8DT8D

DesarbotionAnnunciator 9-5-D DSL OIL STRG TK LVL comes Into alarm ealy.El6277, Y1 Bus Voltage reads low in CTRM compared to local hIdicator.CV5006 SAM Ught did not respond as expected. (Mid-Cycle Outage)Cooling Tower Slowdown failed open and must be controlled manually.HICtH14A position hIdication does not match actualSFRCS red reset light bulbs broken In socketSG 1 FW s/u Control Valve Indication not responding (remains at 0%)SG 2 Operating Level Recorder changed & computer points didntTPCW High Level Tank U reads 1 foot lower than local IndicationFWST Control Room U reads low compared to local Indication2nd Stage MSR Blanketing Steam throttle valve will not throttle from CTRM

- During the week prior to 21504. a thorough review of Control Room tags was performed and a decision was made to addsix existng conditions to the list.

- As part of Restart beginning December 15. 2003, DavIs-Sesse transitioned from Outage Scheduling to the normal FENOCOn-line Scheduling process and transitioned to work planning, prioritization and scheduling in accordance with FENOC WorkManagement Process Nuclear Operating Procedures. Control Room Deficiencies are now prioritized and scheduled inaccordance with these procedures and may be elevated at the discretion of Operations based on their significance.

Owner - K. OstrowskiAnalysis - J. FawcettOP-01

6


OPEN OPERATOR WORK AROUNDS

I-II

I

zu iiGoodi |1|11Add Close - Actual

105

ftl

5-

*i e S S; r 51 5 5 t S t * ft i i - Sl 5 ftn j fti ft Z ft ft f bti ft FV S a t I M

ft . . . .t . . 1 ft 5 * S 5 151 a I~l I *t * *t t 5 t l S V I I

E#. C VI . . I. S . S . . . V"w. . SS SfTATS .3 . . . . . , _ .r

DEFINITIONA Level One Operator Work Around Is defined as any equipment deficiency or change in plant conditionswhich, during abnormal or emergency conditions, will require an operator to perform compensatory actions. ALevel Two Operator Work Around Is any equipment deficiency or change In plant conditions which, duringnormal operations, will require an operator to perform compensatory actions. The above Indicator tracks thenumber of open Level land 2 Work Arounds. Work Arounds corrected In the field but awaiting testing for finalcloseout are not Included as an Operator Work Around.

GOAL AT STARTUP

Zero Level 1 and 2 Operator Work Arounds at restart.ANALYSIS/ SUMMARYInit Date1130/016/3/03

1129/04214/04214/042141042/6104

2/19/04

Prio £EC300 4122/04400 RFO500 Mid-Cycle300 2/28/04(CR) TBD(CR) RFO(CR) RFO300 TBD

122.22222

DescriptionDFP Day Tank Fill Valve DOI 131,IsolatedDH2733, DH Pump I Suction leaks by potentially lifting DH1508SW1358, CAC#3 Outlet TCV not reopening when It auto-dosesLG2571, LP Condenser Boot Seal Sight Glass Isolated.#1 SG Wet Layup System Isolations leakbyMFPT I will not stay on Turning Gear due to steam valve leakbyDH2734, DH Pump 2 Suction leaks by potentially lffing DH1509Turbine steam packing unloader valves leak by.

As part of Restart, beginning December 15,2003, Davis-Besse transitioned from Outage Scheduling to thenormal FENOC On-ine Scheduling process and transitioned work planning, prioritization and scheduling Inaccordance with FENOC Work Management Process Nuclear Operating Procedures. Operator WorkArounds are now prioritized and scheduled in accordance with these procedures and may be elevated at thediscretion of Operations based on their significance.

OP-02Owner- K. OstrowskiAnalysis - J. Fawcett

7


OPEN MODE 2 & I RESTRAINTS

o.C14

0:E

I

0

fU)S1

70 -

60 _-_ _

30

10A

2r2 1213 1 24 125 i218 2(9 12M1 21I1211 211: 21112n7 12 9 12,2012r2312124 12I25 22 1 21271 311

CA'7 2 27 2 27 25 24 20 16 14 1 10 67 = =7

Mode 21 CSR 21 10 11 10 9 9 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 4 _

ORDER-IR13FieldWck 9 9 8 15 13 14 14 13 13 12 9 7 7 7 7 6

ORDER 4 20 9 8 _ 10 10 10 8 4 3 5 |2 2 2 3 2_____

SWU a 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _

ITota 8 61, 03 3621 6 68 6 26 r50 42 37 33 27 2 24 24 20 0 0 0 O O

DEFINITIONAny Item that would prevent plant mode change based upon open CREST Restart CA's, CREST RSRBRestart CR's requiring evalutation, OPS/Admin Mode Restraint CR's, 13RFO coded Orders, Orders requiringPost Maintenance Testing, required Surveillance Testing.

GOAL

Clear ALL Restart Restraints prior to station restart.

ANALYSISI SUMMARY

02/20/2004 - Field work Increase reaited to H2 Dilution Blower, I new CA, I new CR02/05/2004 - Field work increase related to AFW2, HX0102104/2004 - CR Mode Hold Resolutions Awaiting Approval = 0

1/30/2004 - CA increase following RSRB reviews1/1612004 - CR increase following RSRB reviews

Owner - K. OstrowskiOP-05 Analysis - R. Oesterle

8


100% CONDITION REPORT SRO REVIEW. *l] _ |Goal >95%

100% Good~8o%

60%

40%

20% . . . |

112 Week Avg

DEFINITIONThis indicator measures the percent of Condition Report (CR) Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) reviewscompleted within one day after the review by the originators supervision to ensure timely review of plantconfiguration and operability concerns. The SRO reviews requested by the Management Review Board(MRB) are excluded from this indicator.

GOAL AT STARTUPRestart goal Is for 95% or more of the SRO reviews to be completed within one day.

ANALYSIS/ SUMMARYNinety-four percent (50/53) of the SRO reviews were completed within one day after the review by theoriginator's supervision with the remaining three SRO reviews having a duration of up to three days.The decrease can be contributed to resources focusing on plant start-up activities, training activitiesand operating crews benchmarking at Perry and Beaver Valley. Major plant activities have beencompleted and this trend Is expected to improve. The 12-week average (1211/03 - 2/22104) 1s 87percent of the SRO reviews completed within one day.

This performance Indicator has been adjusted through week ending 218/04 to remove the timeOperations staff were performing peer reviews of the Initial SRO Condition Report review. Thepurpose of the indicator Is to measure the timeliness of SRO reviews of potential plant concerns. ThisIs accomplished on the initial SRO review. The performance Indicator was adjusted back to weekending 11/2/03.

Owner- i. DohrmannAnalysis - S. GatterCA-01

9


CONDMMON REPORT EVALATON

IIuU

wl jl~m m wmi1ldlwa . 2 2 1W 11? 172 sa & 1W a jow l W I %W W JUa M i m 1W II AU SIN 11I I U &= a .I A &M . ja m w a wla SI %w I am

DEFINITIONThis Indicator nmeasures te mawrer of Restart and No-Restart Condition Reports (CR) axmently open for complefion ofheir evaluation. The CR Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) review date i used as the starting point for new evaluation

assignments.

GOAL AT STARTUPThe restart goal Is a decreasing tend d open CR evaluations.

ANALYSISI SUMMARYThe tend of open CR evaluatons has decreased by 18 percent aver te last six weeks. The Z750 open CRevaluationsconsist df 1,660 (60.4%) - NCAQ (Conditions Not AMerse to Quality), 1,087 (39.5%) - CAQ (Conditions Advemse toQuald . and 3(0.1%) - SCAO (Sigriricent Conditions Advrse to Qulity). The organiationsmi the highest number ofopen CR eva uations are

Plart Engineering - 1.049 open (decreased by six percent)Design Engineern - 608 open (decreased byfive percent)Mantenance - 282 open (Inceased by nine percert)Operations -296 open (decreased by21 percent)Radiation Protectin -127 open (decreased by fve percent)Pfnect Management -117 open (ireased byone percent)

- CR & Cok reduction meetings are being set up to begin In February to address the pioitiation and schedtiing ofwork-off by section. These meetings vIn be chaired by the PRnt Manager.

Owner - L DohrmannAnalysis - S. GatterCA402

10


CORRECTIVE ACTION RESOLUTiON

I., .. 1 14 . ISo

,Jtlal 7MmLtaim~ ,.Ampi-lul umm 1M4U U M M i 46U*S ? )1 61 Ai M"" lN flu Stat MM47 M g4M M M

I-n K out O~pen|

DEFINITIONThis Indicator measures the number of Restart and Non-Restart Condition Report (CR) Corrective Actionscurrently open for resolution. The Manager acceptance date Is used as the starting point for new correctiveaction assignments.

GOAL AT STARTUP

The restart goal is a decreasing trend of open CR corrective actions.

ANALYSIS/ SUMMARYThe trend of open CR corrective actions has Increased three percent over the last nine weeks. The 8,597 opencorrective actions consist of 3,199 (37.2%) - NCAQ (Conditions Not Adverse to Quality), 5,062 (68.9%) - CAQ(Conditions Adverse to Quality), and 336 (3.9%) - SCAQ (Significant Conditions Adverse to Quality). Theorganizations with the highest number of open CR corrective actions are:

Plant Engineering - 2,017 open (decreased by three percent)Design Engineering - 1,562 open (increased by less than one percent)Outage Management & Work Control - 1,247 open (increased by two percent)Maintenance - 753 open (no change)Operations - 713 open (decreased by one percent)Training - 626 open (decreased by two percent)

- CR & CA reduction meetings are being set up to begin In February to address the prioritization andscheduling of work-off by section. These meetings will be chaired by the Plant Manager.

Owner - L. DohrmannAnalysis - S. GatterCA-03

11

_

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATIONORGANIZATIONAL READINESS

CONDITION REPORT SELF-IDENTIFIED RATE1 IAI7

90%

160%LO0%

60%

Goal > 85% F09F

aM0

... .. I--- - 1

112 WeekAv

DEFINITIONThis Indicator reviews the population of Condition Reports (CRs) originated and calculates thepercent self-Identified compared to the total. CRs originated as a result of QA/INPO/NRCInput/feedback or CRs, originated as a result of a self-revealed Issue are not considered self-Identified. The CR Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) review date Is used as the starting point fordetermining the self-Identified rate.

This Indicator assesses the Davis-Besse organization's ability to Internally identify conditions adverseto quality. A high value is representative of an organization that Is engaged and committed to theCorrective Action Process.

GOAL AT STARTUPRestart goal Is for a twelve week rolling average of 85% or more of the CRs originated to beself-Identified.

ANALYSIS/ SUMMARYNinety-one percent (143/158) of the CRs originated were self-Identified. The 12-week average(12/1/03 - 2/22/04) Is 87 percent of the CRs originated were self-Identified.

Internal Oversight - six percent (10/1 58)Extemnal Oversight - one percent (2/158)Self-Revealing - two percent (31158)

Owner - L. DohrmannCA-04 Analysis - S. Gatter~

12


ROOT CAUSE EVALUATION QUALITY10

8

2

0

linApp.d::=tvvd oommwwRutI=u mww nl 2*A Y.&ApW 01 - - 12~%dAY.PM1&9

DEFINmONThe top line of this Indicator measures the percentage of Root Cause evaluations and other designateddocuments accepted (approved and approved with comments) by the Corrective Action Review Board (CARB).Root Cause evaluations are counted once regardless of subsequent changes or CARB acceptance after Initialrejection. The differential between the 12 week average lines for Root Cause evaluations accepted (approvedand approved with comments), and Root Cause evaluations approved Is an Indication of CARB participationand their added value to the Root Cause evaluations.

GOAL AT STARTUPRestart goal Is for an Improving trend of the twelve week average, then a long-term goal of 9Wh or moreRoot Cause evaluations accepted by the CARB.

ANALYSIS/ SUMMARY

One CARB meeting was held during the week ending 2122104. No Root Cause reports were reviewed by theCARB. There are no Root Cause evaluations currently ready for CARB review. The 12-week average(1211/03 - 2122104) Is 78 percent of the Root Cause evaluations accepted by the CARB.

The reduction to the 12-week average this week Is not a result of current performance, but the dropping off ofan approved Evaluation from the 12-week ave-rage. The two rejects In December 2003, caused the 12-weekrolling average to dip.

Owner - L DohrmannCA-05 Analysis - S. Getter

13


CONDITION REPORT CATEGORY ACCURACY

I 60%

50%

l 12 Week Avg7|

DEFINITIONThis Indicator measures the percent of Condition Report (CR) categories recommended by theoriginators supervision that do not require escalated categorization by the Management ReviewBoard (MRB).

GOAL AT STARTUP

Restart goal Is to maintain a Twelve Week Rolling Average level of 90% or better.

ANALYSISI SUMMARYThe MRB changed the supervisory recommended category to a higher level on four percent (7/177) ofthe CRs. One category change resulted hi an increase from a condition adverse to quality (CAQ) to asignificant condition adverse to quality (SCAQ). The 12-week average (12/1103 - 2/22/04) of CRcategory recommendations not escalated by the MRB Is 94 percent.

Owner - L DohrmannCA-08 Analysis - S. Gatter

14

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATIONORGANIZATIONAL READINESS.

1.2

X 1.0

Ia 0.8

°0.6

I OA

1 0.2

0.0

INDMDUAL ERROR RATE

Restart Goal .OA5_ _

Long Termn Goal co029

-r --I - --- AIe4'#eee0e

I Rate - -Restart Goal - 12 Week Avg - -- -ig-Term Goal

DEFINITIONAn individual error Is an inappropriate human action specific to an Individual. The appropriate depthof barriers (procedures, training, supervision, and plant design) to the error are already In placesufficiently to preclude the error from recurring with any other Individual. The error had a reasonablepotential to affect plant safety, regulatory position, financial liability, environmental impact or powerproduction. The Individual error rate Is the number of qualifying errors per 10,000 hours worked.

GOAL AT STARTUP

Restart goal is twelve week rolling average c 0.45 individual errors per 10,000 hours

ANALYSISI SUMMARY

During the week, there were no Condition Reports (CR) that met the screening criteria for thisindicator resulting In an individual error rate of 0.0 errors per 10,000 hours worked for the week. The12-week rolling average Is 0.30 individual errors per 10,000 hours worked.

Owner - L DohrmannAnalysis - J. GrimmCA-06

15

I

ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS

1.0PROGRAM & PROCESS ERROR RATE

|Goodj-

1 0.8

e 0.6

1.x OA

[02

0.0

Restart Goal < 0.50

W ------- W W W - - - - M - - - - - - - M - M - W - - - - - - - - .._ _ _ ._ _ _ _ __I I I_ _ _ _ _ _

IL

IIII I::_ _10 _Long Term Goal c 0.30

_ _- , - - - - - - - - - - -

iz-��II 1-

_ _ -_ _ _

4 P$ 4P 4e#4P 0 e e % 4.4 # 40'tt 4k

r Rat- - - RestartGoalt 12WeekAvg- - - Long-TehnGoalI

DEFINITIONA Program and Process Error is an undesirable situation caused by the lack of sufficient informationfor the performer to complete the task or evolution successfully. It Is a human performance barrierbreakdown not specific to any individual because the Insufficient barriers would exist for any otherperson attempting to complete the task. The error had a reasonable potential to affect plant safety,regulatory position, financial lability, environmental Impact or power production. The program errorrate Is the number of program and process errors per 10,000 person-hours worked.

GOAL AT STARTUP

Restart goal Is twelve week rolling average < 0.50 program errors per 10,000 hours

ANALYSIS! SUMMARYDuring the week, there were no Condition Reports (CR) that met the screening criteria for thisIndicator resulting In a program error rate of 0.0 errors per 10,000 hours worked for the week. The 12-week rolling average Is 0.05 program errors per 10,000 hours worked.

Owner - J. ReddingtonCA-O7 Analysis J. Grimm

16


ENGINEERING QUALITYHe 4eX

Ii

I

iIii-1

3I5 E=lltems 12 Wk Rolling Ave Weeldy Actual |God ]3.5. 010(

3.0

8 802.5

.0 Post Restart Goal00.5 As

Restart GoalS 1 40

1.0 40

200.5 _ A 0 0

o. I I i 1 1 1 4 5 i 4 5 5 t 5 l l l 1 G .4 . 5L ; ; I M I W

1_"Ju "lo filo ^ narVl " _Il" ss l " Is sl "I II Js asr ula t _ I IT" 11"l. . " artI ,P^. rr

II*21

J

DEFINITIONThis indicator measures the score for quality of Engineering products as assigned by the EngineeringAssessment Board (EAB). The score Is based on an assessment of quality in the following areas:Procedural PerformancelImplementation, Rigor In Problem Solving, Team Approach, AnalysisIEvaluationtDesign, Design Basis Maintenance, and Licensing Basis Maintenance.

Score summary. 0 No comment, product Is acceptable as presented.I Omission or error has negligible effect on results.2 Omission or error has minor effect but requires revision of document.3 Significant effect on results.4 Attribute unsatisfactory.

GOAL AT STARTUPThe goal at restart Is to achieve a twelve week rolling average score of 1.0 or less.

ANALYSISI SUMMARYFor week ending February 22, 3 products were assessed with weekly average score of 0.67 with 2products being scored as a 1, and I being scored as 0. The 12-week rolling average Is 0.9.

ProductOE 20044006Calc C-NSA-049.02-031.R.1SCN A-8F-8

Door 303 HELBClean Strain. Head Loss DB SumpStructural Steel Fireproofing

Resoonsible OroDES-APU (graded 0)EnerconDES-SMU

Engineering Assessment Board has established a Post Restart Goal of 0.5 or less. This Post Restart Goalhas been added to graph and Is Intended to be reached prior to the end of Operating Cycle 14.

Owner- J. PowersAnalysis - P. StraubeEN.03

17

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATIONMANAGEMENT AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE

MANAGEMENT OBSERVATIONS100%

90%

f 80%

s70%

0 60%

I 50%. 40%0

30%

20%10%

0%

Iidin M E M E M - M- TZ=.-% --

11111111 I0 e e 0 e 0 e e 0 0,ee.0,& e,0,0,0 *,e,0sPe 4+ e e 0 4# e e 0 0 e

I--7 12 Week Rolling Average |

DEFINITIONThis Indicator measures the percentage of management scheduled observations completed forobservations of training, operations, and field activities. Management observations are Intended toInfluence desired behaviors by direct verbal communication which reinforces performance that meets orexceeds expectations (satisfactory - coached), or provides feedback on undesired performance(unsatisfactory - coached). Strengths and weaknesses result from the coaching opportunities.

GOAL TO RESTARTTwelve Week Rolling Average of 90% or more management observations completed as scheduled.

ANALYSIS/ SUMMARYTwelve Week Rolling Average Is 93%. 85% (11113) of the scheduled management observations werecompleted during the week ending February 22, 2004.

The focus for management observations for the week ending February 22. 2004 was on use of EventFree Tools during various activities.

Activities observed Included Just-In-Time training, housekeeping Inspections, Regulatory Affairs activities.backshift tours, MOV preventative maintenance, removal of scaffolding, and various pre-job briefs.

A pre-job brief was conducted for Individuals who have never toured a nuclear plant, therefore, they werenot familiar with the process. The pre-Job brief included questioning attitudes of Individuals. Discussionsof the protected train were Included. A thorough brief was conducted which resulted In zero mRem for all.

MOV activities Included a pre-Job brief and field activity observations. Strengths Included good anddetailed brief, In particular, emphasizing Tech Spec requirements and methods of control andcommunications. A weakness was identified In three part communication for directives, equipmentstaging, document verification, and coordination with support groups.

Regulatory Affairs noted excellent use of self check I peer check and the application of correspondencecontrol process Including validation.

Owner I Oversight - M. BezillaMH-03 Analysis - K. Fehr

18

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Restart Performance ...Linda Dohrmann Linda Dohrmann Linda...

Documents

Transcript of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Restart Performance ...Linda Dohrmann Linda Dohrmann Linda...