Data Output
of 16
-
Upload
george-grandy -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of Data Output
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
1/16
Frequency Valid Percent
Valid
clerical officer 2 17.7
Snr. court recorder 7 15.6
high court reg 10 22.2
assistant reg of courts 7 15.6
chief registrar 4 8.9
district court registrar 4 8.9
watch man 2 4.4
Deputy director 3 6.7
Total 45 100.0
Total 46
number of years served in current position
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1-5 14 30.4 30.4 30.4
6-10 13 28.3 28.3 58.7
11-15 11 23.9 23.9 82.6
16-20yrs 3 6.5 6.5 89.1
21 yrs and above 5 10.9 10.9 100.0
Total46 100.0 100.0
aherence to principles and practices of democratic trade unionism
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
storngly agree 4 8.7 10.0 10.0
agree 19 41.3 47.5 57.5
neutral 11 23.9 27.5 85.0
disagree 5 10.9 12.5 97.5
strongly disagree 1 2.2 2.5 100.0
Total 40 87.0 100.0
Missing System 6 13.0
Total 46 100.0
frequent,contested elections,with ranking and-file members regularly challenging incumbents
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
2/16
Valid
strongly agree 4 8.7 8.9 8.9
agree 22 47.8 48.9 57.8
neutral 12 26.1 26.7 84.4
disagree 7 15.2 15.6 100.0
Total45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
candidates have eqaul use of union publications and means of communication before election
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 2 4.3 4.4 4.4
agree 20 43.5 44.4 48.9
neutral 18 39.1 40.0 88.9
disagree 3 6.5 6.7 95.6
strongly disagree 2 4.3 4.4 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
union encouraging open and free debate and discussion of issues with candidates beforeelections
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 5 10.9 11.1 11.1
agree 18 39.1 40.0 51.1
neutral 16 34.8 35.6 86.7
disagree 5 10.9 11.1 97.8
strongly disagree 1 2.2 2.2 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
election of representatives are elected by secret ballot of the members they represent
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 9 19.6 20.0 20.0
agree 17 37.0 37.8 57.8
neutral 18 39.1 40.0 97.8
disagree 1 2.2 2.2 100.0
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
3/16
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
elected representatives of JUSAG are subject to recall by the members they represent
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 4 8.7 8.9 8.9
agree 17 37.0 37.8 46.7
neutral 16 34.8 35.6 82.2
disagree 4 8.7 8.9 91.1
strongly disagree 4 8.7 8.9 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
women are allowed to contest all positions of leadership
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 14 30.4 31.1 31.1
agree 17 37.0 37.8 68.9
neutral 12 26.1 26.7 95.6
disagree 2 4.3 4.4 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
critical comments are allowed from all members on issues concerning those who stand forelections
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 5 10.9 11.1 11.1
agree 19 41.3 42.2 53.3
neutral18 39.1 40.0 93.3
disagree 3 6.5 6.7 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
the due diligence process on all position candidates standing for leadership is transparent
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
4/16
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 4 8.7 9.1 9.1
agree 23 50.0 52.3 61.4
neutral 14 30.4 31.8 93.2
disagree 3 6.5 6.8 100.0
Total 44 95.7 100.0
Missing System 2 4.3
Total 46 100.0
The union,s level of conducting elections at the regional and national levels is free and fair
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 10 21.7 22.7 22.7
agree 19 41.3 43.2 65.9neutrral 14 30.4 31.8 97.7
disagree 1 2.2 2.3 100.0
Total 44 95.7 100.0
Missing System 2 4.3
Total 46 100.0
All paid up members legible and allowed to contest any position
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 11 23.9 25.6 25.6
agree 17 37.0 39.5 65.1
neutral 13 28.3 30.2 95.3
disagree 2 4.3 4.7 100.0
Total 43 93.5 100.0
Missing System 3 6.5
Total 46 100.0
Do you experince any form of discrimination by the JUSAG leadership?
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
yes 3 6.5 7.5 7.5
no 37 80.4 92.5 100.0
Total 40 87.0 100.0
Missing System 6 13.0
Total 46 100.0
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
5/16
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
6/16
Missing System 8 17.4
Total 46 100.0
Explain your answer
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid
no real on the part of women 8 17.4 22.9 22.9
the number is too small 7 15.2 20.0 42.9
they are not serious 6 13.0 17.1 60.0
not encouraging 12 26.1 34.3 94.3
each region represented by awomen
2 4.3 5.7 100.0
Total 35 76.1 100.0
Missing System 11 23.9
Total 46 100.0
Workers participate fully in the grievance proces at every step,with full information about unioncases and progress
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 1 2.2 2.2 2.2
agree 20 43.5 43.5 45.7
neutral 17 37.0 37.0 82.6
disagree 6 13.0 13.0 95.7
strongly disagree 2 4.3 4.3 100.0
Total 46 100.0 100.0
Proper coordination between JUSAG offcers and the judicial service management withconstant flow of information from bottom up and vice-versa
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 5 10.9 10.9 10.9
agree 22 47.8 47.8 58.7
neutral 14 30.4 30.4 89.1
disagree 4 8.7 8.7 97.8
strongly disagree 1 2.2 2.2 100.0
Total 46 100.0 100.0
Regular local meetings at least quarterly are held
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
7/16
Valid
agree 10 21.7 21.7 21.7
neutral 21 45.7 45.7 67.4
disagree 12 26.1 26.1 93.5
strongly disagree 3 6.5 6.5 100.0
Total46 100.0 100.0
Meetings are announced ahead of time,at a time and place convenient to members,with anagenda circulated in advance
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 3 6.5 6.5 6.5
agree 14 30.4 30.4 37.0
nuetral 19 41.3 41.3 78.3
disagree 8 17.4 17.4 95.7
strongly disagree 2 4.3 4.3 100.0Total 46 100.0 100.0
Real business are conducted (not just a peprally) with members encouraged to speak,makeproposals,vote,and ask questions, and meeting afterwards
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 1 2.2 2.2 2.2
agree 14 30.4 30.4 32.6
nuetral 19 41.3 41.3 73.9
disagree 11 23.9 23.9 97.8
strongly disagree 1 2.2 2.2 100.0
Total 46 100.0 100.0
Contribution of those at the lower rungs are always incorporated into the decision makingprocess
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 1 2.2 2.2 2.2
agree 13 28.3 28.3 30.4
neutral 21 45.7 45.7 76.1
disagree 11 23.9 23.9 100.0
Total 46 100.0 100.0
Members in the JUSAG enoy more benefits in the association
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
8/16
Valid
strongly agree 2 4.3 4.3 4.3
agree 14 30.4 30.4 34.8
nuetral 22 47.8 47.8 82.6
disagree 6 13.0 13.0 95.7
strongly disagree2 4.3 4.3 100.0
Total 46 100.0 100.0
All contesting candidates have equal access to membership lists before election
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 5 10.9 10.9 10.9
agree 15 32.6 32.6 43.5
nuetral 17 37.0 37.0 80.4
disagree 9 19.6 19.6 100.0
Total 46 100.0 100.0
What are some of the weakness of nature of the participation in JUSAG decision makingprocess
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid
apathy on the part of members ofthe union
5 10.9 11.9 11.9
the regional office not fullequipped
2 4.3 4.8 16.7
lack of information 9 19.6 21.4 38.1
lack of protection of staff 9 19.6 21.4 59.5
not media friend 2 4.3 4.8 64.3
communication gap 15 32.6 35.7 100.0
Total 42 91.3 100.0
Missing System 4 8.7
Total 46 100.0
What are the strenght of the nature of the participation in UASG decision making process
Frequency PercentValid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
free and fair in decision makind 8 17.4 25.8 25.8
negotiating for members ofstaff
13 28.3 41.9 67.7
have the support of the generalstaff
4 8.7 12.9 80.6
good in getting benefit for staff 5 10.9 16.1 96.8
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
9/16
Good structures in place 1 2.2 3.2 100.0
Total 31 67.4 100.0
Missing System 15 32.6
Total 46 100.0
Open publications,with newsletters and websites publishing all members views including thosecritical of officials
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 7 15.2 15.2 15.2
agree 11 23.9 23.9 39.1
nuetral 13 28.3 28.3 67.4
disagree 12 26.1 26.1 93.5
strongly disagree 3 6.5 6.5 100.0
Total 46 100.0 100.0
All agreements between union and management subject to ratification by secret ballot by themembers covered by the contract
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 5 10.9 11.1 11.1
agree 16 34.8 35.6 46.7
neutral 16 34.8 35.6 82.2
disagree 7 15.2 15.6 97.8
strongly disagree 1 2.2 2.2 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
Members vote on striking on return to work and on other decision during strikes, with strikevotes not used to forced members to rafity contracts
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 4 8.7 8.9 8.9
agree 9 19.6 20.0 28.9
nuetral 21 45.7 46.7 75.6
disagree 6 13.0 13.3 88.9
strongly disagree 5 10.9 11.1 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
10/16
Total 46 100.0
Union representatives provide members current and complete copies of the contract and theunion constitution bylaws
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 2 4.3 4.4 4.4
agree 11 23.9 24.4 28.9
neutral 15 32.6 33.3 62.2
disagree 16 34.8 35.6 97.8
strongly disagree 1 2.2 2.2 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
Members have easy access to information on officers salaries,budget and expenses
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 3 6.5 6.7 6.7
agree 9 19.6 20.0 26.7
neutral 24 52.2 53.3 80.0
disagree 7 15.2 15.6 95.6
strongly disagree 2 4.3 4.4 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
Union representatives regularil inform members of their right under national local law
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 3 6.5 6.7 6.7
agree 14 30.4 31.1 37.8
neutral 19 41.3 42.2 80.0
disagree7 15.2 15.6 95.6
strongly disagree 2 4.3 4.4 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
Enforcement of freedom including rights and responsibilities under the relevent regulations
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
11/16
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 4 8.7 8.9 8.9
agree 12 26.1 26.7 35.6
neutral 20 43.5 44.4 80.0
disagree 8 17.4 17.8 97.8
strongly disagree 1 2.2 2.2 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
Members have the right to independent organizing and communication outside union officialstructure
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 3 6.5 6.7 6.7
agree 15 32.6 33.3 40.0
neutral 21 45.7 46.7 86.7
disagree 6 13.0 13.3 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
leadership renders proper accounts to all members
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongley agree 3 6.5 6.7 6.7
agree 15 32.6 33.3 40.0
neutral 18 39.1 40.0 80.0
disagree 7 15.2 15.6 95.6
strongly disagree 2 4.3 4.4 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
satisfied about the contribution made so far by JUSAG leaders in terms of fighting for staffwelfare
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 2 4.3 4.4 4.4
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
12/16
agree 18 39.1 40.0 44.4
neutral 20 43.5 44.4 88.9
disagree 4 8.7 8.9 97.8
stronlgy disagree 1 2.2 2.2 100.0
Total45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
there was an occasion where the ledership went against the spirit and letter of the constitutionof the union
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 2 4.3 4.4 4.4
agree 13 28.3 28.9 33.3
neutral 22 47.8 48.9 82.2disagree 8 17.4 17.8 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
there is equity, fairness and justice in the activities of the current leadership of the union
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
strongly agree 3 6.5 6.8 6.8
`agree 16 34.8 36.4 43.2
neutral 18 39.1 40.9 84.1
diagree 6 13.0 13.6 97.7
strongly disagree 1 2.2 2.3 100.0
Total 44 95.7 100.0
Missing System 2 4.3
Total 46 100.0
how are grievances such as job security, lack of autonomy etc addressed
Frequency Percent ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Valid
through petition to the judicialsecretary
8 17.4 22.9 22.9
local and regional executives 8 17.4 22.9 45.7
regional executives 8 17.4 22.9 68.6
not good enough 2 4.3 5.7 74.3
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
13/16
JUSAG 9 19.6 25.7 100.0
Total 35 76.1 100.0
Missing System 11 23.9
Total 46 100.0
how vocal and steadfastr are your leaders when it comes to negotiation for the welfare of unionmembers
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid
quite vocal but needs to be moreproactive
7 15.2 21.2 21.2
okay 8 17.4 24.2 45.5
normal 13 28.3 39.4 84.8
satisfactory 5 10.9 15.2 100.0
Total 33 71.7 100.0
Missing System 13 28.3
Total 46 100.0
do you see the need for the continuous existence of JUSAG
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
yes 42 91.3 93.3 93.3
no 3 6.5 6.7 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
explailn your answer
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
our only mouthpiece 24 52.2 68.6 68.6
cannot without a union 11 23.9 31.4 100.0
Total 35 76.1 100.0
Missing System 11 23.9
Total 46 100.0
in which way is the union undermined by any member or outside force
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulative
Percent
Validnot yet seen any outsiderundermining the union
11 23.9 100.0 100.0
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
14/16
Missing System 35 76.1
Total 46 100.0
are you satisfied with the conditions of work at the judiciary
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
yes 6 13.0 13.3 13.3
no 39 84.8 86.7 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
salary package
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
get better 4 8.7 8.9 8.9
get worse 22 47.8 48.9 57.8
stay the same 19 41.3 42.2 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
job security
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
get better 1 2.2 2.2 2.2
get worse 24 52.2 53.3 55.6
stay the same 20 43.5 44.4 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
fringe benefits
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
get worse 20 43.5 44.4 44.4
stay the same 25 54.3 55.6 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
15/16
thrift and loan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
get better 1 2.2 2.2 2.2
get worse 20 43.5 44.4 46.7
stay the same 24 52.2 53.3 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
good terminal benefits
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
get better 1 2.2 2.2 2.2
get worse 22 47.8 48.9 51.1
stay the same 22 47.8 48.9 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
treatment by supervisors
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
get better 1 2.2 2.2 2.2
get worse 22 47.8 48.9 51.1
stay the same 22 47.8 48.9 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
workers ability to participate in decision affecting their jobs
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
get better 2 4.3 4.4 4.4
get worse 22 47.8 48.9 53.3
stay the same 21 45.7 46.7 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
-
8/8/2019 Data Output
16/16
interpersonal relationship
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
get better 1 2.2 2.2 2.2
get worse 20 43.5 44.4 46.7
stay the same 24 52.2 53.3 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
provision of help and wellness programmes
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
get better 2 4.3 4.4 4.4
get worse 17 37.0 37.8 42.2
stay the same 26 56.5 57.8 100.0
Total 45 97.8 100.0
Missing System 1 2.2
Total 46 100.0
