Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

download Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

of 21

Transcript of Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    1/21

    4.1 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

    TABLE: 1

    1. What’s motives you to o!" mo!e e##i$ie%t&y' ha((i&y)

     No. of respondents percentage

    Good pay 3 6

    Promotion 11 22

    Less supervision 34 68

    Good working condition 2 4

    ota! "# 1##

      G  o  o  d

       p  a  y

      P  r  o  m

      o  t   i  o  n

      L  e  s  s

       s  u  p

      e  r  v   i  s   i  o  n

      G  o

      o  d   w  o  r   k   i  n

      g   c  o  n  d   i  t   i  o  n

    01020304050607080

    percentage

    percentage

    $N%&P&%'$(N

    )e ta*!e s)ows t)at t)e efficiency and )appiness of an emp!oyee in doing )is work is *ased on !ess

    supervision. $t gives more satisfaction to emp!oyees+. ,rom t)e prospective of t)e firm $t is not good+.

    TABLE: *

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    2/21

    Do you #ee& that the sa&a!y +ei%, o##e!e- at %!stone tea estate+ -a!petta is

    suffient to !ead satisfied !ife

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 1 2/atisfied 3 6

     Neutra! 11 22

    0issatisfied 3# 6#

    ig)!y dissatisfied " 1#

    tota! "# 1##

         i  g   !   "  y   s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  u  t  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y   d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    010203040506070

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates w!et!er t!e sa"ary *eing o+erd at

    %!stone tea estate+ -a!petta is suffient to !ead satisfied !ife , on"y 2- is !ig!"y satis#ed wit!

    t!e sa"ary and 6- o. t!em were satis#ed, /aority o. t!e respondents were

    dissatis#ed wit! t!e sa"ary wit! t!e statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at

    most o. t!e respondents !ave not satis#ed wit! t!e sa"ary,

    TABLE:

    're you satisfied wit) t)e emp!oyment condition prevai!ing your organiation

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    3/21

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 3 6

    /atisfied 18 36

     Neutra! 2# 4#

    0issatisfied 3 6

    ig)!y dissatisfied 6 12

    tota! "# 1##

         i  g   !   "  y

       s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

      $  e  t  u  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    1015202530

    354045

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at t!e emp!oyment condition prevai!ing

    t)e organiation, rom t!e 50 respondents 40- are neutra" and 36- are satis#ed,

    vera"" t!e t!e emp"oyment condition is .air,

    TABLE:4

    1. 0o you fee! satisfied wit) t)e p)ysica! working conditions

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    4/21

    ig)!y satisfied " 1#

    /atisfied 13 26

     Neutra! 2" "#

    0issatisfied " 1#

    ig)!y dissatisfied 2 4

    tota! "# 1##

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  t  u  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    010

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at t!e satis.actory "eve" o. t!e

     p)ysica! working conditions of t)e company. "# of t)e respondents were neutra! and 26 of 

    respondents were satisfied wit) t)e working condition+. )ere are 1# dissatisfied and 4 )ig)!y

    dissatisfied persons.

    TABLE: /

    're you satisfied wit) t)e re!ations)ip e5isting *etween su*ordinates and

    superiors

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 33 66

    /atisfied 1# 2#

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    5/21

     Neutra! 4 8

    0issatisfied 2 4

    ig)!y dissatisfied 1 2

    tota! "# 1##

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  t  u  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

    010203040506070

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at t!e re!ations)ip e5isting *etween

    su*ordinates and superiors are )ig)!y satisfied in 66 of emp!oyees and according!y on!y 2+ 4workers are dissatisfied and )ig)!y dissatisfied 2# are satisfied wit) t)e re!ations)ip and 8 were

    neutra!.

    TABLE: 0

    2. $s your working )ours satisfactory

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 2# 4#

    /atisfied 2# 4#

     Neutra! 8 16

    0issatisfied 2 4

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    6/21

    ig)!y dissatisfied # #

    tota! "# 1##

         i  g   !   "  y   s

      a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

      $  e  t  u  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s

      a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    1015202530354045

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

    '*out 4# of t)e respondents said t)at t)e working )ours of t)e company is )ig)!y satisfactory and 4#

    of t)e respondents were satisfied wit) t)e working )ours and 16 are neutra! a*out t)e working )oursand t)en t)e rest of t)em are dissatisfied wit) t)e working )ours.

    TABLE:

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 11 22

    /atisfied 28 "6

     Neutra! 6 12

    0issatisfied 4 8

    ig)!y dissatisfied 1 2

    tota! "# 1##

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    7/21

    3. 're you satisfied wit) t)e way in w)ic) conf!icts are reso!ved in your 

    company

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  t  u  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&&%'$(N

    )e s)ows w)et)er t)e satisfaction of emp!oyees wit) t)e way in w)ic) conf!icts are reso!ved in t)is

    company "6 of t)e emp!oyees are satisfied t)is and 22 are )ig)!y satisfied and rest of t)e 12+

    8+2 are neutra!+ dissatisfied+ )ig)!y dissatisfied respective!y.

    TABLE: 2

    4. ou fee! satisfied wit) t)e canteen faci!ities

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 2 4

    /atisfied 7 14

     Neutra! 22 44

    0issatisfied 13 26

    ig)!y dissatisfied 6 12

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    8/21

    tota! "# 1##

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  t  u  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    101520253035404550

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates w!et!er canteen .aci"ity is

    advantage .or t!e workers, 14- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement

    and 4- o. t!em are o. t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 44- !ave

    neutra" opinion, 26- o. t!e respondents dissatis#ed and 12- o. t!em strong"ydissatis#ed wit! t!e statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e

    respondents agrees t!at t!e canteen .aci"ity is eit!er advantage not

    disadvantage .or t!e workers,

    TABLE: 3

    /. 're you agreeing t)at t)e work sc)edu!e in your company )e!ps you to improve

    your productivity

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied # #

    /atisfied 6 12

     Neutra! 27 "4

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    9/21

    0issatisfied 16 32

    ig)!y dissatisfied 1 2

    tota! "# 1##

         i  g

       !   "  y   s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  t  u  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "

      y   d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates w!et!er t!e work sc)edu!e in your 

    company )e!ps you to improve your productivity "4 of t)e respondents were neura! a*out t)e

    statement and on!y 12 were satisfied wit) t)is. 32 of t)e respondents are dissatisfies and rest of 

    t)em are )ig)!y dissatisfied.

    TABLE: 1

    6. 're you )ave t)e )a*it of enoying t)e re creationa! faci!ities t)at is *eing

     provided *y t)e company

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 2 4

    /atisfied 4 8

     Neutra! 2# 4#

    0issatisfied 2# 4#

    ig)!y dissatisfied 4 8

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    10/21

    tota! "# 1##

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  t  u  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    1015202530354045

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

    )e ta*!e and c)art s)ows t)e statement t)at t)e )a*it of enoying t)e re creationa! faci!ities t)at is

     *eing provided *y t)e company satisfactory. 4# are neutra! and dissatisfied respective!y.

    TABLE: 11

    7. 're you agreeing t)at t)e training programs provided *y t)e company )e!ps you

    to deve!op your work more

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 1 2

    /atisfied 3 6

     Neutra! 9 180issatisfied 24 48

    ig)!y dissatisfied 13 26

    tota! "# 1##

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    11/21

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  t  u  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    0

    10

    20

    3040

    50

    60

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at training programs provided *y

    t!e company, 6- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 2- o. 

    t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 18- !ave neutra" opinion, 48- o. t!e

    respondents dissatis#ed and 26- o. t!em strong"y disagree wit! t!e statement

    so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave dissatis.action

    a*out t!is,

    TABLE: 1*

    're you satisfied wit) t)e present o*

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 2 4

    /atisfied 4 8

     Neutra! 18 36

    0issatisfied 18 36

    ig)!y dissatisfied 8 16

    tota! "# 1##

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    12/21

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  t  u  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    10152025

    303540

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at t!e satis.action wit! t!e present

     o*, 8- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 4- o. t!em

    strong"y agree wit! t!e same and 36- !ave neutra" opinion, 36- o. t!e

    respondents dissatis#ed and 16- o. t!em strong"y disatis#ed wit! t!e

    statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave

    neutra" opinion a*out t!is,

    Wea!e measu!es

    TABLE: 1

    8. :edica! faci!ities

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%ig)!y satisfied 1 2

    /atisfied " 1#

     Neutra! 2# 4#

    0issatisfied 2# 4#

    ig)!y dissatisfied 4 8

    tota! "# 1##

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    13/21

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  t  u  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    1015202530

    354045

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at medica" .aci"ities provided *y

    t!e company, 10- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 2- o. 

    t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 40- !ave neutra" opinion, 40- o. t!e

    respondents dissatis#ed and 8- o. t!em strong"y disagree wit! t!e statement

    so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave dissatis.action

    a*out t!is,

    TABLE: 14

    9. ompensation for accidents

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 3 6

    /atisfied 11 22

     Neutra! 23 46

    0issatisfied 6 12

    ig)!y dissatisfied 7 14

    tota! "# 1##

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    14/21

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  u  t  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    101520253035

    404550

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at ompensation for accidents provided

    *y t!e company, 22- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 6- o. 

    t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 46- !ave neutra" opinion, 12- o. 

    t!e respondents dissatis#ed and 14- o. t!em strong"y dissatis#ed wit! t!e

    statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave

    satis.action a*out t!is,

    TABLE: 1/

    1#.ransportation

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%ig)!y satisfied 2 4

    /atisfied 3 6

     Neutra! 1# 2#

    0issatisfied 26 "2

    ig)!y dissatisfied 9 18

    tota! "# 1##

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    15/21

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  u  t  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    0

    10

    20

    3040

    50

    60

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at transportation provided *y t!e

    company, 6- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 4- o. t!em

    strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 20- !ave neutra" opinion, 52- o. t!e

    respondents dissatis#ed and 18- o. t!em strong"y dissatis#ed wit! t!e

    statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave

    dissatis.action a*out t!is,

    TABLE: 10

    11.ousing and accommodation

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 2 4

    /atisfied 19 38

     Neutra! 19 38

    0issatisfied 8 16

    ig)!y dissatisfied 2 4

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    16/21

    tota! "# 1##

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  u  t  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    101520253035

    40

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at )ousing and accommodation

    provided *y t!e company, 38- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement

    and 4- o. t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 38- !ave neutra" opinion,

    16- o. t!e respondents dissatis#ed and 4- o. t!em strong"y dissatis#ed wit!

    t!e statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave

    satis.action a*out t!is,

    TABLE: 1

    12.$s t)e *onus provided *y t)e organiation is ade;uate

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied 1" 3#

    /atisfied 1" 3#

     Neutra! 12 24

    0issatisfied 7 14

    ig)!y dissatisfied 1 2

    tota! "# 1##

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    17/21

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  u  t  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    101520253035

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at  *onus provided *y t)e organiation,

    30- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 30- o. t!em strong"y

    satis#ed wit! t!e same and 24- !ave neutra" opinion, 14- o. t!e respondents

    dissatis#ed and 2- o. t!em strong"y dissatis#ed wit! t!e statement so .rom

    t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave satis.action a*out t!is

    So$ia& se$u!ity measu!es

    TABLE: 12

    13.$s t)e *onus provided *y t)e organiation is ade;uate

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%

    ig)!y satisfied # #

    /atisfied 18 36

     Neutra! 2# 4#

    0issatisfied 8 16

    ig)!y dissatisfied 4 8

    tota! "# 1##

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    18/21

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  u  t  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    1015202530

    354045

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

    )e ta*!e c)art s)own a*ove indicates t)at

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    19/21

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  u  t  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    101520253035

    404550

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

     (!e ta*"e and c!art s!own a*ove indicates t!at  provident fund provided *y t)e

    organiation, 44- o. t!e respondents satis#ed wit! t!e statement and 4- o. 

    t!em strong"y satis#ed wit! t!e same and 38- !ave neutra" opinion, 14- o. 

    t!e respondents are dissatis#ed and no*ody is strong"y dissatis#ed wit! t!e

    statement so .rom t!is we can conc"ude t!at most o. t!e respondents !ave

    satis.action a*out t!is

    TABLE: *

    Pension

     N(.(, &%/P(N0%N/ P%&%N'G%ig)!y satisfied 2 4

    /atisfied 23 46

     Neutra! 17 34

    0issatisfied 7 14

    ig)!y dissatisfied 1 2

    tota! "# 1##

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    20/21

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  u  t  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    101520253035

    404550

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

    )e a*ove detai!s s)own t)at satisfied of t)e a!! respondent.

  • 8/18/2019 Data Analysis,. employee satisfaction

    21/21

         i  g   !   "  y 

      s  a  t   i  s  #  e  d

      $  e  u  t  r  a   "

         i  g   !   "  y 

      d   i  s  s  a  t   i  s  #

      e  d

    05

    1015202530

    354045

    PERCENTAGE

    P%&'%$()G%

    $N%&P&%'$(N

    )e socia! security measures taken *y t)e company is good+ *ecause among t)e "# workers 4# workers

    are satisfied and t)e 4# workers were neutra! and on!y a few dissatisfied wit) t)is+.