Daniel C. Bello, Editor Georgia State University jim@gsu

9
1 Daniel C. Bello, Editor Georgia State University [email protected] A peer-reviewed journal dedicated to innovative scholarly and managerially relevant work on marketing in a global context

description

Journal of International Marketing. Daniel C. Bello, Editor Georgia State University [email protected] A peer-reviewed journal dedicated to innovative scholarly and managerially relevant work on marketing in a global context. Journal of International Marketing. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Daniel C. Bello, Editor Georgia State University jim@gsu

Page 1: Daniel C. Bello, Editor  Georgia State University  jim@gsu

1

Daniel C. Bello, Editor Georgia State University [email protected]

A peer-reviewed journal dedicated to innovative scholarly and managerially relevant work on marketing in a global context

Page 2: Daniel C. Bello, Editor  Georgia State University  jim@gsu

2

Substantive issue in international marketing Literature-based and scholarly Conceptually & empirically rigorous Managerially relevant: new insights for

practice Contribution to knowledge of marketing in a

global context

Page 3: Daniel C. Bello, Editor  Georgia State University  jim@gsu

3

Reviewers 50 member Editorial Review Board 200 ad hoc reviewers in database

Review Procedures 4 reviewers; typically 2 board members Time to complete review

Average 31 days; Range 5—120 days

Editorial decision in 60 to 90 days Acceptance rate 20%

Reviewing Process

Page 4: Daniel C. Bello, Editor  Georgia State University  jim@gsu

4

DevelopmentalReview Process

Identify “kernel of contribution” versus search for reasons to reject.

Explain “how & why” current approach is poor.

Suggest improvements / new approaches that enhance contribution.

If fatal flaw precludes publication, describe problem in detail.

Page 5: Daniel C. Bello, Editor  Georgia State University  jim@gsu

5

Major Reasons for Rejection Research question not interesting

Poorly motivated; importance not established Unclear “Contributions” to theory / practice

Poor conceptual development Underdeveloped construct definitions Unconvincing logic; lacks overarching theoretical

framework Research design / measurement inappropriate

Page 6: Daniel C. Bello, Editor  Georgia State University  jim@gsu

6

Reviewer’s Perspective “The research merely empirically

describes this setting…there are no broad principles and nothing to generalize”.

“This study’s theoretical foundation is inadequate…the author’s arguments are simply speculations without any logical basis”.

Page 7: Daniel C. Bello, Editor  Georgia State University  jim@gsu

7

Reviewer’s Perspective “…constructs are not properly defined or

labeled…there is a great deal of ambiguity”.

“Sample is limited to small and medium-sized exporters without a rationale. Hypotheses seem more relevant to larger exporters with resources…the findings are confounded by firm size issues.”

Page 8: Daniel C. Bello, Editor  Georgia State University  jim@gsu

8

Web site: www.marketingpower.com/jim

Publication Criteria & Review Policies Editorial Procedures & Manuscript Guidelines Tables of Contents & Article Summaries Editorial Review Board Best Article Awards Editorial office contact information

Page 9: Daniel C. Bello, Editor  Georgia State University  jim@gsu

9

Manuscript Submissions

[email protected]

Or contact

Daniel C. Bello, EditorJournal of International MarketingDept. of MarketingGeorgia State UniversityAtlanta, GA 30303