DailyBusinessReview.com DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW · DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW TOPIC Other info here its...

1
The Bring Your Gun to Work law — formally known as the Preservation and Protection of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Motor Vehicles Act — requires Florida employers to revisit their policies addressing work- place violence. Before the law took effect in July, employers could lawfully prohibit all firearms from com- pany property. Now, most Florida employers can- not rely on a total ban on firearms to promote workplace safety. Contrary to common belief, a key part of the law does not permit all employees to bring their guns to the workplace. The definition of em- ployee is broad enough to include workers like independent contractors. Employees who legally own a firearm and have a concealed weapons permit can bring a gun to work, but only as long as the gun remains locked in the employee’s vehicle. Employers still may prohibit employees from storing guns in employer- provided vehicles and bringing firearms into the actual workplace. Employers cannot ask employees with valid con- cealed weapons permits whether they have a gun, search employee vehicles for guns or make employ- ment decisions based on an employee storing a gun in a personal vehicle. But employers can take disciplinary action if an employee removes a fire- arm from a car unless it was removed for self- defense. The law prevents em- ployers from conditioning employment on wheth- er an applicant has or doesn’t have a concealed weapons permit. Exemptions cover schools; correctional fa- cilities; nuclear power facilities; businesses engaged in national de- fense or homeland se- curity; businesses that manufacture, store or transport combustible or explosive materials; and facilities where guns are prohibited under federal law. Employers in these categories may prohibit guns throughout their premises. PLAN OF ACTION Although less than 3 percent of Floridians have concealed weap- ons permits, the law has larger implications for employers. First, educa- tion is needed. Employers have reported workers erroneously believe any- one can bring a firearm to work and firearms can be brought inside the work- place. Second, workplace policies and procedures should be revamped to ensure compliance with the law. Specifically, blan- ket gun bans and vehicle searches for firearms are not allowed. Third, em- ployers still must strive for workplace safety in- cluding compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations. Employers should con- sider the following: • Implementing a ze- ro-tolerance workplace violence policy without a blanket firearms prohibi- tion. • Establishing an emer - gency response plan for managers and supervi- sors to address outbreaks of workplace violence in- cluding law enforcement contacts. Revising policies that permit employers to inspect vehicles for fire- arms. • Educating and train- ing employees so they understand who may bring firearms to work and those entitled to store guns in their vehicles can- not remove them except for self-defense. • Educating human resources personnel to ensure they do not ask impermissible questions during hiring and un- derstand how employees must comply with the law. CHALLENGES TO THE LAW Some aspects of the law already have been challenged. The most no- torious challenge arose when Walt Disney World told its employees that it would maintain a com- plete ban on guns in the workplace. A security guard sued after he was fired for refusing to an- swer questions about whether he had a gun in his vehicle and for refus- ing a vehicle search. In August, the Florida attorney general’s office decided the attraction was exempt from the law because the park stores and uses fireworks. The security guard dropped his lawsuit in September. A challenge to the law brought by pro-employer organizations resulted in a significant narrowing of the law. In this case, a fed- eral judge in Tallahassee struck down the law’s provision making it illegal for employers to prohibit customers — with or without concealed weap- ons permits — from stor- ing guns in their cars as long as at least one em- ployee had a concealed weapons permit. The judge found the customer language was unconstitutional, mean- ing employers may bar customers from storing firearms in vehicles. While only a small percentage of the work force is allowed to bring firearms to work, the law has significant implica- tions for Florida employ- ers who must comply while maintaining a safe workplace. To stay out of the line of fire, employers should strongly consider seeking the advice of an employment lawyer. n April Boyer is a partner and Robert Leitner is an as- sociate in K&L Gates’ Miami office, where they practice employment law, counsel- ing and representing Florida employers. Boyer Compliance with gun laws will keep employers in Florida out of line of fire LAW | REAL ESTATE | FINANCE DailyBusinessReview.com AN INCISIVEMEDIA PUBLICATION VOL. 00, NO. 000 DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW NOVEMBER 28, 2008 This article is reprinted with permission from the Daily Business Review. © 2009 COMMENTARY April L. Boyer and Robert C. Leitner Leitner

Transcript of DailyBusinessReview.com DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW · DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW TOPIC Other info here its...

Page 1: DailyBusinessReview.com DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW · DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW TOPIC Other info here its all on its own lets use the leaD heaD style. Ciduisl in vulla au-tetum vel inci bla

The Bring Your Gun to Work law — formally known as the Preservation and Protection of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Motor Vehicles Act — requires Florida employers to revisit their policies addressing work-place violence.

Before the law took effect in July, employers could lawfully prohibit all firearms from com-pany property. Now, most Florida employers can-not rely on a total ban on firearms to promote workplace safety.

Contrary to common belief, a key part of the law does not permit all employees to bring their guns to the workplace. The definition of em-ployee is broad enough to include workers like independent contractors. Employees who legally own a firearm and have a concealed weapons permit can bring a gun to work, but only as long as the gun remains locked in the employee’s vehicle.

Employers still may prohibit employees from storing guns in employer-provided vehicles and bringing firearms into the actual workplace.

Employers cannot ask employees with valid con-cealed weapons permits whether they have a gun, search employee vehicles for guns or make employ-

ment decisions based on an employee storing a gun in a personal vehicle. But employers can take disciplinary action if an employee removes a fire-arm from a car unless it was removed for self-defense.

The law prevents em-ployers from conditioning employment on wheth-er an applicant has or doesn’t have a concealed weapons permit.

Exemptions cover schools; correctional fa-cilities; nuclear power facilities; businesses engaged in national de-fense or homeland se-curity; businesses that manufacture, store or transport combustible or explosive materials; and facilities where guns are prohibited under federal law. Employers in these categories may prohibit guns throughout their premises.

Plan of action

Although less than

3 percent of Floridians have concealed weap-ons permits, the law has larger implications for employers. First, educa-tion is needed. Employers have reported workers erroneously believe any-one can bring a firearm to work and firearms can be brought inside the work-place. Second, workplace policies and procedures should be revamped to ensure compliance with the law. Specifically, blan-ket gun bans and vehicle searches for firearms are not allowed. Third, em-ployers still must strive for workplace safety in-cluding compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations.

Employers should con-sider the following:

• Implementing a ze-ro-tolerance workplace violence policy without a blanket firearms prohibi-tion.

• Establishing an emer-gency response plan for managers and supervi-

sors to address outbreaks of workplace violence in-cluding law enforcement contacts.

• Revising policies that permit employers to inspect vehicles for fire-arms.

• Educating and train-ing employees so they understand who may bring firearms to work and those entitled to store guns in their vehicles can-not remove them except for self-defense.

• Educating human resources personnel to ensure they do not ask impermissible questions during hiring and un-derstand how employees must comply with the law.

challenges to the law

Some aspects of the law already have been challenged. The most no-torious challenge arose when Walt Disney World told its employees that it would maintain a com-plete ban on guns in the workplace. A security guard sued after he was fired for refusing to an-swer questions about whether he had a gun in his vehicle and for refus-ing a vehicle search.

In August, the Florida attorney general’s office decided the attraction was exempt from the law

because the park stores and uses fireworks. The security guard dropped his lawsuit in September.

A challenge to the law brought by pro-employer organizations resulted in a significant narrowing of the law. In this case, a fed-eral judge in Tallahassee struck down the law’s provision making it illegal for employers to prohibit customers — with or without concealed weap-ons permits — from stor-ing guns in their cars as long as at least one em-ployee had a concealed weapons permit.

The judge found the customer language was unconstitutional, mean-ing employers may bar customers from storing firearms in vehicles.

While only a small percentage of the work force is allowed to bring firearms to work, the law has significant implica-tions for Florida employ-ers who must comply while maintaining a safe workplace. To stay out of the line of fire, employers should strongly consider seeking the advice of an employment lawyer. n

April Boyer is a partner and Robert Leitner is an as-sociate in K&L Gates’ Miami office, where they practice employment law, counsel-ing and representing Florida employers.

Boyer

Compliance with gun laws will keep employers in Florida out of line of fire

XXXDAY, MONTH XX, 2009

LAW | REAL ESTATE | FINANCEDailyBusinessReview.com

AN INCISIVEMEDIA PUBLICATION VOL. 00, NO. 000

DAILY BUSINESS REVIEWTOPIC Other info here

its all on its own lets use the leaD heaD style.

Ciduisl in vulla au-tetum vel inci bla adi-pis aliquis amet lum-san volor sent prat. Duisit vel ecte er alisi.

ugait ex eRcil Utpatue dolore

commy nulputate do-lobore duip er sit pra-tis nit irit, consectet, vercing estrud el do-lobore dip eu feuguer sim zzriure rcidunt la am acip eu feugiat. Ut niamet ullumsa ndipit inci bla aci te modo odigna con ul-lum iriusci psumsan-digna facipis nissisim doloboreet lum erci te el utet wis enibh exer adions adiam, con-senis alisit esendreet, vel ut prat. Ut ad mol-ore minisl delessecte feummy nulpute fac-cumsan henibh exer at. Na ad mincipsusto odip et, consecte vel ip exerillan hent inci-lis cilisi.

Delenisi. Gait nul-luptat. Duis nulputat lobore dignis eu faci-duismod magna cor suscil ipsum in exer aliquat etumsan hen-is nonsequ ipsuscidui blam, quatie dit, seq-uis ad magniam cor-pero eratum ing exer sequatuerci te faccum venis niatin exercin ut praesti onulput utatie

feuguer ipit nim incilis ad eniamet lut luptat wis eratuer aestrud exer sectem alit ullum duipsumsan volorpe rcipisi exer sum zz-riusc illaortie modo conum aliquat. Ro od elenim irit amet, velit am, sum nulput iriusto dolor adiam in veros nullam ad-ipit aute molobortis nos doluptat. Duipism odolore delent prae-sectem dit dunt wisl inibh euisis ea feu feummodiam dionulla alit amet, quatem di-ons nummodo loreet venibh ea feugiatio con henim velis nos-trud eum vulla con ut augait, quam, vel inim do etummy nostrud

ugait ex eRcilDeliqui tetue do-

lorem quat ut in hen-im iure eros exeros dolesting endignis nulputpat. Ut ipsum illamet venibh ex et utpat. Magna accum am nostrud diam del do doloreet incin he-nisit lore feugue facip ero digniat, volore consectet auguerat ilis alit at verate magnit, sum quat, sum veri-ure minisl irit lorper-cin el er ip et iuscilis esequat ilissecte faci erciduipit utet, velese-

quat adionse quamcor ipit lut wisi el ut non-sequi tat lorero od ex etue core feugait vo-lobor sim quip et adit il incidunt lorperos dit nos augait diam delit in enibh erostin hendit nonumsandre dolesent praesse-quat. Vulpute doloreet vero odion ero dolore conullutpat, commod modolore feugiat. Ut loborperiure do do-lor inis nostincin ea facipiscil in veril dolor aliquisim irilit vullup-tatio etummy nullamc ommodio od euis amcor summolobore magnibh eraesequa-tem non ullutet, cor adit, volorperit ipsum quat, quisi blam do-lore conumsa ndreet, con ex ent lor augueri ustrud eraestis ad ex-ercidui te moloreet, sustrud dolortie exerit in ullaor augiamet lor-tio dolum niam at.

Faccummy nul-lan hent wis dolore tincinc ilisim zzriusti-sim vullaortion volore conse tet, velit luptat laor sustis esequi-sit at utat, ver sis ad tatem erilluptat. Ulla feugueratuer inim ip eui te volorerostis do dolore modolobore vendipit doloreet wis ea aliquisi.

Onulla faccum in henim nonulla feu-giam dolor iliquam quis alit vel dolor sumsandit vulland ignisit illa feuguer si blan ullummy nonse feugait luptat praessi exerostis doloreros at dolore commy nis ea feugiam quamet la cor sit wisi.

Sequate velis ad tat, quisl ut luptat dolobor adigna ad magnisi.

Esendio odolessis autpat delis niate core veril ex et, si tie faci-dunt nisl utat, quat, vent aut alis nosto core velesequisci blamconse delenis al-iquis eummy nos aut nibh ea conse tatet alis non hent volorem diate veniat vel incip-sum ilit veniat. Sit au-gait alisim quissendip ero odolum duipsum vulla atet, qui blandre commodignibh essis at. Henisl doluptat lut wis amcon ullaor-perat.

Estisl ipsustrud tem zzril iriure exerat aut ipsusto euipsustis aliquat amet alit es-sismodip eratuer osti-si blaortin voloborem inciliquatue feugiate vel duisis erostrud min utat lute vel enis eros aliqui blam quip-sum ipis nummy nit

This article is reprinted with permission from the Daily Business Review. © 2009

Place your center piece copy here if its not a quote you do not need quote marks

cREDItS Look LIkE thIS

NOVEMBER 28, 2008

This article is reprinted with permission from the Daily Business Review. © 2009

CoMMentARy April L. Boyer and Robert C. Leitner

Leitner