Daglig borerapportProject meeting March 23 2006

www.olf.no

Agenda

1. Status terminologi-definisjon- Presentere terminologi etter møter med BP, ConocoPhillips, Statoil, Hydro og programvareleverandører- Avklare behov for videreutvikling av terminologien

2. Planer for det videre arbeidet- Generering av XML-skjema- Tilrettelegging av LicenseWeb for daglig borerapportering- Produksjonssetting

3. Eventuelt

www.olf.no

Current PlanDate Task

26.01 Project meeting (1-06)

24.02 Daily Drilling Report Terminology based on CDRS suggested.

06.03 Meeting Hydro

07.03 Meeting Statoil

08.03 Meeting ConocoPhillips

09.03 Meeting BP

10.03 Start updating according to feedback from meetings and review

23.03 Project meeting (2-06)

31.03 Terminology work complete

xx.04 2-3 days XML kick off, POSC, Capgemini, project participants

25.04 Project meeting (3-06) ?

23.05 Project meeting (4-06) ?

31.07 XML schemas complete

01.08 Start Pilot, and adjust

31.08 Project meeting (5-06) – decision to recommends implementation?

www.olf.no

Summary

1. Met and reviewed terminology with drilling experts and it-professionals from operators and vendors.

• Statoil • Hydro• Conocophillips• Total• BP• Peloton• Landmark

2. Approximately 140 issues and comments from meetings.

• To be resolved by PSA/OD, Operators and DNV

www.olf.no

Open tasks in project1. Issue resolution

• Phase 1:CDRS including minor changes from NPD/PSA and other project participants.

• Phase 2:Major gaps?

2. Create XML schemas• Kick off meeting mid April with Capgemini, POSC and DBR

participants

3. Pilots – how, where and when?• Valhall one possible case• + one other case

Review detailsProject meeting March 23 2006

www.olf.no

Review details 1

1. The information in CDRS will cover partner reporting

2. Clarification of terms and definitions• GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION – relative to what?• FORMATION PORE PRESSURE – is this measured or

predicted?

3. Time codes/activities/operations• SUPERIOR

• Not logical with BOP TEST • MAIN OPERATION & SUB OPERATION

• Done differently from company to company• DOWN TIME/INTERUPTION not linked to interrupted

operation in CDRS• Seems to be a need for more downtime details than

CDRS provides• Hydro has suggested new coding • Complex job....

www.olf.no

4. Suggested additional information• Cement• Period of operation• “Drilling like” units of measure

• Hours in stead of minutes • Inches in stead of meters• Etc...

• Formation name – selection list• Use Survey tools not “Single shot measurement

indicator”• Datum (reference points)

• Mean sea level• Wellhead

• Casing type• Tapered string• Expandable

• Pressurized coring• Indicator

Review details 2

www.olf.no

4. Suggested additional information (cont.)• Well stimulation (At well testing) indicator• “Shallow water kick” is a kick type• Perforation - Shot density• RIG ID • RIGTYPE• Bit data• Side track

• Technical side track (BP)• Geological side track (BP)

• Tight wells

Review details 3

www.olf.no

Phase 1 vs. Phase 2 - suggestion

Phase 1• CDRS information• Clarification of terms and

definitions• Use Survey tools not “Single

shot measurement indicator”• RIG ID

Phase 2• Operation codes• Cement• Period of operation• “Drilling like units of measure• Formation name – selection

list• Datum (reference points) • Casing type• Pressurized coring• Well stimulation (At well

testing) indicator• Perforation - Shot density• RIGTYPE• Bit data• Side track• Tight wells• ++

www.olf.no

Daily Drilling Report – suggested sections

1. Basic information2. Status3. Mud data 4. Pore pressure5. Present operation 6. Survey7. Operation/mode8. Log9. Core10.Well production test11.Well Formation Test (WFT)12.Weather13.Remarks – Removed from CDRS14.Lithology15.Equipment failure16.Well Control Incident17.Preliminary zonation18.Perforation intervals