7/24/2019 Daclag v Mahilig

1/2

THIRD DIVISION

G.R. No. 159578 February 18, 2009

ROGELIA DACLAG and ADELINO DACLAG (deea!ed", !ub!#$#u#ed by RODEL %. DACLAG, and ADRIAN %. DACLAG,Petitioners,

vs.

ELINO %ACA&ILIG, ADELA %ACA&ILIG, CONRADO %ACA&ILIG, LOREN'A &AER and ENI)A DEL RO*ARIO, Respondents.

R E S O L U T I O N

A+*)RIA%AR)INE', J.:

Before us is petitioners' Motion for Reonsider!tion of our Deision d!ted "u#$ %&, %& ()ere (e !ffir*ed t)e Deision d!ted Oto+er -, % !nd t)e Reso#ution

d!ted u/ust -, %0 of t)e 1ourt of ppe!#s 213 in 145.R. 1V No. 6&67&.

Reords s)o( t)!t ()i#e t)e #!nd (!s re/istered in t)e n!*e of petitioner Ro/e#i! in 7&6, respondents8 o*p#!int for reonve$!ne (!s fi#ed in 77, ()i) (!s

(it)in t)e 4$e!r presriptive period.

9e ru#ed t)!t sine petitioners +ou/)t t)e propert$ ()en it (!s sti ## !n unre/istered #!nd, t)e defense of )!vin/ pur)!sed t)e propert$ in /ood f!it) is un!v!i#in/. 9e

!ffir*ed t)e Re/ion!# Tri!# 1ourt 2RT13 in findin/ t)!t petitioners s)ou#d p!$ respondents t)eir orrespondin/ s)!re in t)e produe of t)e su+:et #!nd fro* t)e ti*e

t)e$ (ere deprived t)ereof unti# t)e possession is restored to t)e*.

In t)eir Motion for Reonsider!tion, petitioners ontend t)!t t)e 4$e!r period for reonve$!ne is !pp#i!+#e if t)e !tion is +!sed on !n i*p#ied or ! onstrutive

trust; t)!t sine respondents' !tion for reonve$!ne (!s +!sed on fr!ud, t)e !tion *ust +e f i#ed (it)in four $e!rs fro* t)e disover$ of t)e fr!ud, itin/ Gerona v.

De Guzman,()i) (!s reiter!ted inBalbin v. Medalla.%

9e do not !/ree.

In Caro v. Court of Appeals,0(e )!ve e

7/24/2019 Daclag v Mahilig

2/2

9e !re not persu!ded.

Not!+#$, petitioners never r!ised t)is issue in t)eir !ppe##!nts' +rief or in t)eir *otion for reonsider!tion fi#ed +efore t)e 1. In f!t, t)e$ never r!ised t)is *!tter

+efore us ()en t)e$ fi#ed t)eir petition for revie(. T)us, petitioners !nnot r!ise t)e s!*e in t)is *otion for reonsider!tion (it)out offendin/ t)e +!si ru#es of f!ir

p#!$, :ustie !nd due proess, spei!##$ sine M!