D. Britton Project Manager’s Report David Britton 12/Jan/2005.

D. Britton

Project Manager’s Report

David Britton 12/Jan/2005

12/Jan/2005 Project Manager’s Report D. Britton

Overview

1. Resources

2. Project Maps

3. Tier-1 Hardware


GridPP1 Financial Summary

SLA FY01 £1,522,055SLA FY02 £1,639,723SLA FY03 £1,602,243SLA FY04 £1,778,706 (Note-1)

£6,542,727£171,911 (Note-2)

Issued £4,746,476Carried forward £143,050 (Note-3)

£4,603,426CERN £5,666,835 (Note-4)

Miscellaneous £12,658£16,997,556

(£2,444)£99,633 (Note-5)

£102,077

Over (under) spend

University Grants

Recoverable costs (estimate)Total GridPP1 funds remaining (estimate)

Grand Total GridPP1 Expenditure

RAL

Non SLA

Globus Support

SLA Subtotal

GridPP1 Grants Subtotal

Balance of £3.6m attributed to GridPP2

To be confirmed by PPARC

Dissemination officer Grant

Planned.

£56,283 EDG cost claim£18,349 (Est.) Manchester.£25,000 (Est.) Bristol.



TOTAL FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004

CERN £5,666,835 £0 £907,843 £2,379,162 £2,379,829

DataGrid £3,647,223 £561,819 £1,098,147 £1,272,651 £714,606

Tier-1/A £3,654,985 £836,345 £913,455 £630,552 £1,274,634

Tier-2 £102,143 £0 £0 £24,499 £77,645

Applications £2,051,827 £97,403 £662,348 £738,856 £553,221

Operations £1,874,543 £417,827 £431,181 £590,750 £437,786

TOTAL £16,997,556 £1,913,394 £4,012,973 £5,636,469 £5,437,721

Breakdown by Financial Year

1/Jan/2005

£3.65m

£5.67m

£3.65m

£2.05m£1.87m

CERN

DataGrid

Tier - 1/A

ApplicationsOperations

No significant changes to categories

FY03 hardware spend slipped to FY04



Jan 2005

£0.81m

£2.77m

£2.86m

£0.82m

£0.66m

£2.99m

£2.70m

£1.00m

£2.40m

Tier-1/AHardware

Tier-2Operations

Applications

M/S/N

LCG-2

MgrTravel

Ops

Tier-1/AOperations

Category Sub-Cat Posts iSY FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 Total CostLCG £0Tier-1 Staff 13.5 39.5 £437,914 £906,278 £942,529 £408,429 £2,695,151Tier-1 Hardware £700,000 £800,000 £900,000 £0 £2,400,000Tier-2 Staff 19.0 50.2 £447,783 £813,941 £1,082,032 £448,302 £2,792,059Tier-2 Hardware £150,000 £50,000 £0 £0 £200,000Applications Staff 19.0 50.0 £313,190 £1,027,785 £1,072,414 £450,704 £2,864,093N/M/S Staff 14.5 42.6 £458,194 £920,174 £964,050 £426,559 £2,768,977Operations Managers 3.4 10.5 £161,910 £319,853 £329,170 £143,529 £954,463Operations Staff 2.0 5.3 £35,224 £145,994 £150,823 £64,893 £396,934Operations Travel £131,284 £272,000 £284,000 £119,000 £806,284Operations Misc £30,000 £40,000 £40,000 £15,000 £125,000

71 198 £2,865,499 £5,296,026 £5,765,018 £2,076,417 £16,002,961£16,002,077

(£884)

GridPP2 TotalTotal Available

Surplus (Deficit)

Total includes £102,077 carriedforward from GridPP1.

Funds are fully allocated.


GridPP1 Effort Summary

Effort Delivered

Effort Expected (Months)

Months Fraction

Effort funded via SLA ~600 575 96%

Effort funded via Grants 795 ~750 94%

TOTAL 1395 1325 95% “Unfunded” effort reported

on Middleware 254

“Unfunded” effort reported on Applications

155

TOTAL 409

Approximately 38.7 FTE/year funded in GridPP1 and approximately 48.2 FTE/year effort reported against deliverables.


GridPP2 Effort Summary

Other Funding

Work Area FTE Total Posts Unfilled FTE

Application Interfaces 18.5 20 1 (Note-1)

Middleware/Security/Networking 14.5 18 2 ~10

Tier-2 14 21 13 ~8 (Note-2)

Tier-1 13.5 13.5 2 3

EGEE Infrastructure Support 9.5

Project Management Board 3.4 (Note-3) 0 0

Operations (Note-4) 2 0 0

TOTAL 62.5 72.5 18 ~30

GridPP2 Funding

Note-1: Not possible to estimateNote-2: May fall once Tier-2 posts are in place; expected about 4.Note-3: Reduced from 3.6 in previous planning.Note-4: Dissemination officer and Production Manager.

62.5 FTE/year (c.f. GridPP1 38.7).Tier-2 hardware posts currently being filled.


Overview

1. Resources

2. Project Maps

3. Tier-1 Hardware


GridPP1 Final ProjectMap

1. 1 2. 1 3. 1 4. 1 5. 1 6. 1 7. 11.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 3.1.4 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4 5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.3 6.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 7.1.1 7.1.2 7.1.3 7.1.41.1.5 2.1.5 2.1.6 2.1.7 2.1.8 3.1.5 3.1.6 3.1.7 3.1.8 4.1.5 4.1.6 4.1.7 4.1.8 6.1.5

2.1.9 3.1.9 3.1.10 4.1.9

1. 2 2. 2 3. 2 4. 2 5. 2 6. 2 7. 21.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 5.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 7.2.1 7.2.2 7.2.31.2.5 1.2.6 1.2.7 1.2.8 2.2.5 2.2.6 2.2.7 3.2.5 3.2.6 3.2.7 3.2.8 4.2.5 4.2.6 4.2.71.2.9 1.2.10 3.2.9

1. 3 2. 3 3. 3 4. 3 5. 3 6. 3 7. 31.3.1 1.3.2 1.3.3 1.3.4 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.3.4 5.3.1 5.3.2 5.3.3 6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3 6.3.4 7.3.1 7.3.2 7.3.3 7.3.41.3.5 1.3.6 1.3.7 1.3.8 2.3.5 2.3.6 2.3.7 3.3.5 3.3.6 4.3.51.3.9 1.3.101.3.11

1. 4 2. 4 3. 4 4. 4 5. 41.4.1 1.4.2 1.4.3 1.4.4 2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 4.4.4 5.4.1 5.4.2 5.4.3 5.4.41.4.5 1.4.6 1.4.7 1.4.8 2.4.5 2.4.6 2.4.7 3.4.5 3.4.6 3.4.7 3.4.8 4.4.5 4.4.6 5.4.51.4.9 3.4.9 3.4.10 Metric OK 1.1.1

Metric not OK 1.1.11. 5 2. 5 3. 5 4. 5 Task complete 1.1.1

1.5.1 1.5.2 1.5.3 1.5.4 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.5.3 2.5.4 3.5.1 3.5.2 3.5.3 3.5.4 4.5.1 4.5.2 4.5.3 4.5.4 Task overdue 1.1.11.5.5 1.5.6 1.5.7 1.5.8 2.5.5 2.5.6 2.5.7 3.5.5 3.5.6 3.5.7 122 days 1.1.11.5.9 1.5.10 Task not due soon 1.1.1

Not Active 1.1.12. 6 3. 6 4. 6 No Task or metric

2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 3.6.1 3.6.2 3.6.3 3.6.4 4.6.1 4.6.2 4.6.32.6.5 2.6.6 2.6.7 2.6.8 3.6.5 3.6.6 3.6.7 3.6.8 Navigate up2.6.9 3.6.9 3.6.103.6.113.6.12 Navigate down

External link2. 7 3. 7 Link to goals

2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 2.7.4 3.7.1 3.7.2 3.7.3 3.7.42.7.5 2.7.6 2.7.7 2.7.8 3.7.5 3.7.6

2. 8 3. 82.8.1 2.8.2 2.8.3 2.8.4 3.8.1 3.8.2 3.8.32.8.5

WP8

1 2 3

Deployment

WP4

WP5

Fabric

Technology

WP6

Due within

ATLAS

GridPP Goal

ResourcesInteroperability Dissemination

Tier-1

Tier-A

LHCb Tier-2

CERN DataGrid Applications Infrastructure

WP1

WP2

WP3

LCG Creation

Applications

WP7

ATLAS/LHCb

CMS

BaBar

CDF/DO

UKQCD

Other

Data Challenges

Rollout

Testbed

30-Sep-04Status Date

Int. Standards

Open Source

Worldwide Integration

UK Integration

Monitoring

DevelopingEngagement

Participation

To develop and deploy a large scale science Gridin the UK for the use of the Particle Physics community

Presentation Deployment

5 6 74

Update

Clear

Metric OK

Metric not OK

Tasks Complete

Tasks Overdue

Tasks due in next 90 days

Tasks deactivated

Change Forms Enacted

44 0 168 0 3 20 7


GridPP2 ProjectMap

K 0. Production Grid I

H H H H H H

K 1. 1 I K 2.1 I K 3.1 I K 4.1 I K 5.1 I K 6.1 I

K 1. 2 I K 2.2 I K 3.2 I K 4.2 I K 5.2 I K 6.2 I

K 1. 3 I K 2.3 I K 3.3 I K 4.3 I K 6.3 I

K 1. 4 I K 2.4 I K 3.4 I K 4.4 I K 6.4 I

K 2.5 I K 3.5 I

Navigate down K

External link I

Link to goals HK 2.6 I K 3.6 I

BaBar

Portal

ExternalLCG

Planning

Non-LHC Apps

Applications Metadata

Interoperability

ATLAS Dissemination

Deployment

GridPP2 Goal

To develop and deploy a large scale production quality grid in the UK for the use of the Particle Physics community

Tier-A Tier-1 Tier-2 Deployment Middleware Support Experiment Support Grid Operations

1 654M/S/N LHC Apps Management

Data & Storage Ganga SAMGrid

Grid Technology Workload LHCb

Computing Fabric

Engagement

Grid Deployment Security CMS UKQCD KnowledgeTransfer

32

Management

Management

& MonitoringInformation PhenoGrid

Network LHC Deployment


GridPP2 ProjectMap

J K

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.100 0.101 0.102 0.103 0.104 0.105 0.106 0.107 0.108 0.109 0.110 0.111 0.112 0.113 0.114 0.115 0.116

0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.117 0.118 0.119 0.120 0.121 0.122 0.123 0.124 0.125 0.126 0.127 0.128 0.129 0.130 0.131 0.132 0.133

0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.134 0.135 0.136 0.137 0.138 0.139 0.140 0.141 0.142 0.143 0.144 0.145 0.146 0.147 0.148 0.149 0.1500.52 0.53 0.54 0.55 0.56 0.57 0.151 0.152 0.153 0.154 0.155 0.156

H H H H H H

K 1. 1 I J 2.1 K J 3.1 K J 4.1 K J 5.1 K J 6.1 K

2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 3.1.4 3.1.5 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.5 5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.3 5.1.4 5.1.5 6.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 6.1.5

2.1.6 2.1.7 2.1.8 2.1.9 2.1.10 3.1.6 3.1.7 3.1.8 3.1.9 3.1.10 4.1.6 4.1.7 4.1.8 4.1.9 4.1.10 5.1.6 5.1.7 5.1.8 5.1.9 5.1.10 6.1.6 6.1.7 6.1.8 6.1.9

2.1.11 2.1.12 3.1.11 3.1.12 3.1.13 4.1.11 4.1.12 4.1.13 4.1.14 5.1.11 5.1.12

K 1. 2 I J 2.2 K J 3.2 K J 4.2 K J 5.2 K J 6.2 K

2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 2.2.5 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.2.5 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.2.5 5.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3 5.2.4 5.2.5 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 6.2.4 6.2.5

2.2.6 2.2.7 2.2.8 2.2.9 2.2.10 3.2.6 3.2.7 4.2.6 4.2.7 4.2.8 4.2.9 4.2.10 5.2.6 5.2.7 5.2.8 5.2.9 5.2.10 6.2.6 6.2.7 6.2.8 6.2.9 6.2.10

2.2.11 2.2.12 2.2.13 2.2.14 2.2.15 4.2.11 4.2.12 4.2.13 4.2.14 5.2.11 5.2.12 5.2.13 5.2.14 5.2.15 6.2.11 6.2.12 6.2.13

K 1. 3 I J 2.3 K J 3.3 K J 4.3 K J 6.3 K

2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.5 3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 3.3.5 4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.3.4 4.3.5 6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3 6.3.4 6.3.5

2.3.6 2.3.7 2.3.8 2.3.9 2.3.10 3.3.6 3.3.7 3.3.8 3.3.9 3.3.10 4.3.6 4.3.7 4.3.8 4.3.9 4.3.10

2.3.11 3.3.11 3.3.12 3.3.13 4.3.11 4.3.12 4.3.13

K 1. 4 I J 2.4 K J 3.4 K J 4.4 K J 6.4 K

2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 2.4.5 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4 3.4.5 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 4.4.4 4.4.5 6.4.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 6.4.4

2.4.6 2.4.7 2.4.8 2.4.9 2.4.10 3.4.6 3.4.7 3.4.8 3.4.9 3.4.10 4.4.6 4.4.7 4.4.8 4.4.9

2.4.11 2.4.12 2.4.13 2.4.14 2.4.15 3.4.11 3.4.12 3.4.13 3.4.14 3.4.15

J 2.5 K J 3.5 K 60 Days2.5.1 2.5.2 2.5.3 2.5.4 2.5.5 3.5.1 3.5.2 3.5.3 3.5.4 3.5.5

K 2.5.6 2.5.7 2.5.8 2.5.9 2.5.10 3.5.6 3.5.7 3.5.8 3.5.9 Monitor OK 1.1.1I 2.5.11 Monitor not OK 1.1.1H Milestone complete 1.1.1

J 2.6 K J 3.6 K Milestone overdue 1.1.1

2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5 3.6.1 3.6.2 3.6.3 3.6.4 3.6.5 Milestone due soon 1.1.1

2.6.6 2.6.7 2.6.8 2.6.9 2.6.10 3.6.6 3.6.7 3.6.8 3.6.9 3.6.10 Milestone not due soon 1.1.1

2.6.11 2.6.12 2.6.13 Item not Active 1.1.1

LHC Deployment

Applications

Project Planning

5Non-LHC Apps

Navigate downExternal link

PhenoGrid

Other Link

Computing Fabric

Production Grid Milestones Production Grid Metrics

1LCG External

+ next

Portal Engagement

UKQCD Knowledge Transfer

Status Date - 30/Sep/04

Grid Technology

ManagementM/S/N

Metadata

Storage Interoperability

Dissemination

LHC Apps

Project Execution

BaBar

SamGrid

CMS

LHCb

GANGA

ATLAS

Network

GridPP2 Goal: To develop and deploy a large scale production quality grid in the UK for the use of the Particle Physics community

Grid Deployment

2 3

Workload

6

Security

InfoMon

4

Update

Clear

253 Milestones, 112 Monitoring Metrics at present.Work to be done:

LCG area to be defined.Production Grid details refined.Some metrics are not yet finalised.Specific risks and dependencies to be included.


Risk Register

Li Im Risk Li Im Risk Li Im Risk Li Im Risk Li Im Risk Li Im RiskR1 Recruitment/retention difficulties 3 2 6 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 4R2 Sudden loss of key staff 1 4 4 1 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 3R3 Minimal Contingency 1 2 2 2 2 4 1 2 2R4 GridPP deliverables late 1 3 3 4 2 8R5 Sub-components not delivered to project 2 4 8 2 3 6 2 3 6 2 4 8 2 3 6R6 Non take-up of project results 2 1 2 2 3 6 1 4 4R7 Change in project scope 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 1R8 Bad publicity 2 2 4 1 3 3 1 3 3R9 No publicity 1 1 1

R10 External software dependence 2 3 6 2 4 8 1 4 4 3 2 6R11 Lack of monitoring of staff 1 2 2 2 2 4 2 3 6 1 2 2R12 Withdrawal of an experiment 1 4 4 1 4 4 1 2 2R13 Lack of cooperation between Tier centres 1 4 4 1 2 2R14 Scalablity problems 1 3 3 2 3 6 1 3 3R15 Software maintainability problems 2 2 4 1 3 3R16 Technology shifts 1 3 3 1 4 4 1 3 3 2 3 6R17 Repitition of research 3 2 6R18 Lack of funding to meet LCG PH-1 goals 1 3 3R19 Adequate persistency solution not ready 1 3 3R20 Conflicting software requirements 4 1 4 2 2 4R21 Tier-A hardware fails to meet requirements 1 3 3R22 Other Hardware fails to meet requirements 1 1 1R23 Hardware physical risk (large scale) 1 4 4R24 Hardware physical risk (small scale) 2 2 4R25 Hardware procurement problems 2 2 4R26 LAN Bottlenecks 2 1 2R27 Tier-2 organisation fails 2 2 4

R28 Tier-2 hardware not used as planned 2 1 2R29 SYSMAN effort inadequate 2 3 6R30 Firewalls interfere with Grid 1 3 3R31 Inablility to establish trust relationships 2 2 4R32 Security inadequate to operate Grid 3 3 9R33 GGF does not establish standards 1 3 3R34 Minimal open source code development 2 2 4R35 Failure of international cooperation 3 2 6 1 4 4R36 e-Science and GridPP divergence 2 2 4R37 Institutes do not embrace Grid 1 3 3R38 Grid is not stable enough for use 1 3 3R39 Delay of the LHC 2 2 4R40 Lack of future funding 1 4 4 2 2 4R41 Network backbone failure 0 4 0.4R42 Network backbone bottleneck 1 2 2Alt-i-r

Currently using GridPP1 Register.

13 Changes made: 2 Risks added 5 risks reduced 5 risks increased 1 adjusted

2 previously High riskswere reduced. R10_GridPP (S.linux) R14_LCG (Stability)

1 risk elevated to High. R32_INF (Security)


Tier-1 Hardware

The issues here are:

•The “fair” allocation of Tier-1 hardware

•International MOU’s and other less formal commitments

•The Disk-CPU balance and the real cost of Tape

•The absolute scale.

Enter the Spreadsheet


Tier-1 Hardware

Input

Splits Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape

ALICE 33% 67% 0% 36% 49% 15% 33% 55% 12% 28% 57% 15% 25% 57% 18%ATLAS 25% 75% 0% 38% 56% 6% 42% 43% 15% 36% 46% 18% 36% 49% 15%CMS 28% 69% 3% 60% 27% 13% 45% 25% 30% 37% 24% 39% 39% 43% 18%LHCb 62% 34% 5% 16% 72% 12% 14% 77% 9% 12% 78% 11% 15% 82% 3%BaBar 43% 54% 3% 34% 59% 7% 34% 62% 4% 32% 65% 3% 31% 65% 3%CDF 39% 61% 0% 32% 68% 0% 31% 69% 0% 51% 49% 0% 48% 52% 0%D0 23% 77% 0% 68% 23% 9% 69% 23% 8% 76% 10% 13% 71% 11% 18%H1 0% 100% 0% 56% 25% 19% 54% 30% 16% 47% 32% 21% 42% 32% 26%MINOS 100% 0% 0% 9% 62% 30% 7% 61% 32% 5% 52% 43% 4% 47% 49%SNO 60% 40% 0% 61% 34% 5% 57% 39% 4% 51% 43% 6% 48% 45% 7%ZEUS 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0%Other Exp. 75% 25% 0% 69% 31% 0% 65% 35% 0% 60% 40% 0% 57% 43% 0%PhenoGrid 6% 94% 0% 5% 95% 0% 5% 95% 0% 4% 96% 0% 3% 97% 0%UKQCD 23% 77% 0% 18% 82% 0% 25% 75% 0% 34% 66% 0% 31% 69% 0%Other Thr. 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Other 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

2006 2007 20082004 2005

Weights 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

ALICE 1 1 1 1 1ATLAS 1 1 1 1 1CMS 1 1 1 1 1LHCb 1 1 1 1 1BaBar 3 2 1 0.5 0.3CDF 1 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.3D0 1 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.3H1 1 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.3MINOS 1 1 1 1 1SNO 0 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.3ZEUS 1 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.3Other Exp. 1 1 1 1 1PhenoGrid 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3UKQCD 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3Other Thr. 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3Other 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

September

Shares Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape

ALICE 3 12 0 6 16 22 12 31 20 23 64 30 38 97 64ATLAS 36 237 0 112 339 177 283 462 493 553 960 690 1038 1588 949CMS 13 72 37 75 68 149 127 111 402 237 207 626 466 572 496LHCb 36 44 67 21 194 143 42 367 129 78 719 186 189 1173 82BaBar 68 187 117 78 280 156 90 260 48 95 264 24 106 246 23CDF 10 36 0 15 66 0 30 105 0 68 91 0 73 89 0D0 6 44 0 32 22 39 66 35 39 103 19 46 109 19 61H1 0 76 0 34 31 109 67 59 97 83 77 93 83 71 117MINOS 17 0 0 3 43 93 5 76 117 9 126 191 13 176 363SNO 0 0 0 13 15 10 25 27 9 31 36 9 33 35 11ZEUS 0 73 0 0 121 0 0 191 0 0 231 0 0 214 0Other Exp. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0PhenoGrid 0 6 0 0 11 0 1 19 0 1 37 0 2 58 0UKQCD 1 10 0 2 20 0 7 32 0 20 55 0 36 88 0Other Thr. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 191 796 221 392 1224 898 756 1777 1354 1301 2886 1895 2186 4426 2166

20082004 2005 2006 2007

M&O Authors 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

ALICE 6 6 6 6 6ATLAS 109 113 113 113 113CMS 36 47 47 47 47LHCb 45 50 50 50 50BaBar 40 44 44 44 44CDF 20 20 20 20 20D0 20 20 20 20 20H1 26 26 26 26 26MINOS 13 13 13 13 13SNO 9 9 9 9 9ZEUS 25 25 25 25 25Other Exp. 0 0 0 0 0PhenoGrid 7 7 7 7 7UKQCD 15 15 15 15 15Other Th. 0 0 0 0 0Other 0 0 0 0 0

Table of “M&O Authors. Future information sketchy.To preserve unitarity ought to: be an FTE count to come from groups not experiments.


Tier-1 Hardware

Weights 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008


September



TOTAL 191 796 221 392 1224 898 756 1777 1354 1301 2886 1895 2186 4426 2166

20082004 2005 2006 2007

M&O Authors 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008


Input



2006 2007 20082004 2005

Table of “Splits”: CPU/Disk/Tape ratio.Future information is sketchy.


Tier-1 Hardware

Input



2006 2007 20082004 2005

September



TOTAL 191 796 221 392 1224 898 756 1777 1354 1301 2886 1895 2186 4426 2166

20082004 2005 2006 2007

M&O Authors 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008


Weights 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008


Table of “Strategic Weights.”

Movement of M&O authors. Future stategic importance. Other factors?

Clearly controversial…… requesting input.


Tier-1 Hardware

Input



2006 2007 20082004 2005

Weights 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008


M&O Authors 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008


September



TOTAL 191 796 221 392 1224 898 756 1777 1354 1301 2886 1895 2186 4426 2166

20082004 2005 2006 2007

Output – guidelines for the User Board withinwhich to perform actual allocation.Output – guidelines within which international MOU’s can be discussed.Note current lack of information on absolute scale.


Tier-1 Hardware

We would like the CB’s input to this Hardware allocation process.

A breakdown from each institute of estimated M&O FTE/experiment for 2005 to 2008 would significantly reduce the current influence of the “strategic weights”.

Ideally, we would like the blessing of the CB for this approach and then, with some added assessment of the actual scale of the hardware, present to PPARC for consideration in the context of both the international MOU’s (BaBar, LHC, etc) and for post-GridPP planning.

D. Britton Project Manager’s Report David Britton 12/Jan/2005.

Documents

Transcript of D. Britton Project Manager’s Report David Britton 12/Jan/2005.