CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

30
MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly 29/09/2016 1 THE DIFFICULTY OF INTERNET SURVEYS: RANDOM SAMPLING & SYSTEMATIC ERRORS

Transcript of CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Page 1: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

29/09/2016 1

T HE D I FF I CU LT Y OF I NT E R NET S U RVE Y S :

RA N DOM S A M P L I N G & SY S TE M AT I C E R R OR S

Page 2: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

1.Introduction: Importance of Surveys and their accuracy

2.Compare & Contrast Random Sampling Errors & Systematic Errors

3.Why do these errors happen?

4.Internet Surveys5.How these errors

intertwine with the Internet

6.How to Reduce these errors

7.Conclusion

L I S T O F C O N TE N T S

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Tomáš Bubák© 2016 29/09/2016 2

Page 3: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

IM P O RTAN C E O F SU RVE Y AC C U RACY

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

(Zikmund, Babin, 2010 ) 29/09/2016 3

Page 4: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

NO T H IN G I S

P E RF E C T

a2ua.com Ballerina 2016 29/09/2016 4

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Page 5: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Total survey error= Random Sampling Error

+ Systematic Error

(Assael, Keon, 1982) 29/09/2016 5

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Page 6: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Occurs because of the selected variations in the

sample.

(Zikmund, Babin, 2010 , 308) 29/09/2016 6

RA ND O M S A M P L I NG ER R O R

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Page 7: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Population Selected Sample

(Renckly, 2016) 29/09/2016 7

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Page 8: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Occurs because of the design of the survey itself and overall correctness of the execution.

(Zikmund, Babin, 2010 , 308) 29/09/2016 8

S Y S T E MAT I C (NO NS A M P L I N G )

ER R O R S

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Page 9: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Why do these errors happen?

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

29/09/2016 9

Page 10: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

(Assael, Keon, 1982) 29/09/2016 10

The sample selected is not the “perfect”

portrayal of the tested

population

VS

More difficult to control.

Due to nonresponse &

response errors.

RA ND OM S A M PL I NG E R R OR S

S Y S T E M AT I C E R R OR S

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Page 11: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

When some people of the sample do not respond.

When respondents respond inaccurately.

(Assael, Keon, 1982) 29/09/2016 11

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

NON RESP ON SE ERRO R

RESP O NSE ERROR

Page 12: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

NE E D T O F O CU S O N RE D U C I NG BO T H

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Tomáš Bubák© 2016 29/09/2016 12

Page 13: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Research concluded that random sampling error is

minor while Systematic Error is a large

contributor to total errors

(Assael, Keon, 1982) 29/09/2016 13

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Page 14: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

T H E D I L E M M ASelect a large sample to

minimize random sampling error OR put money and effort on smaller samples to ensure

better outcome

(Assael, Keon, 1982) 29/09/2016 14

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Page 15: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

But given possible time constraints, it is difficult to concentrate on doing both.

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

29/09/2016 15

Page 16: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Therefore, the popular choice is to conduct Internet

Surveys

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

29/09/2016 16

Page 17: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

I N TE RN E T SU RVE Y S

(Hoonakker, Carayon, 2009, 350) 29/09/2016 17

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Page 18: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Yes, internet surveys improve response rate…

But, difficult to make accurate.

(Ziegenfuss, Beebe, Rey, Schleck, Locke, Talley, 2010) 29/09/2016 18

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Page 19: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

H O W E R RO RS INT E RT W INE W I T H T H E IN TE R NE T

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

29/09/2016 19

Page 20: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Sample size can be easily increased in Internet Surveys

TO RE D U CE RAN D O M S AM P L IN G E RRO R

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

(Hoonakker, Carayon, 2009, 350) 29/09/2016 20

Page 21: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

How to reduce Systematic Errors in internet surveys?

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

29/09/2016 21

Page 22: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

TAK E I NT O ACC O UN T TH E D I F F ER E NT T IM E Z O N E S

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

(Zikmund, Babin, 2010 , 308) (Hoonakker, Carayon, 2009, 353-359) 29/09/2016 22

Page 23: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

F I ND RE ASO NS F O R NO NR E SP O NS E AN D RE SP O N SE E R RO RS

(McDaniel, Gates, 1999) (Matzkin, 2007) 29/09/2016 23

Page 24: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

(McDaniel, Gates, 1999) 29/09/2016 24

Page 25: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

T H E D E S I G N

Tomáš Bubák© 2016 (Groves, Lyberg, 2010) (McDaniel, Gates, 1999) 29/09/2016 25

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Page 26: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

C ON C LU S I O NMKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

29/09/2016 26

Page 27: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Random sampling errors cannot be avoided. They are caused by chance. To reduce it is to increase the sample size, which is made easily through

internet surveys.

Systematic errors have a large impact on the total error.

Although Internet surveys are the popular choice due to rapid response, it contains a possibility for

large amounts of errors.

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

29/09/2016 27

Page 28: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

Possible ways to reduce non sampling errors on internet surveys:

Consider the time zones of who will be selected.

Find the reasons behind nonresponse and response

error. Extra thought must be put into

the design of the survey.Place incentives for

completion.Quality over quantity.

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

29/09/2016 28

Page 29: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

TH ANK YO U

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Tomáš Bubák© 2016 29/09/2016 29

Page 30: CW1_MKT375:2_Ann Connolly

References

Zikmund, W. G., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Essentials of Marketing Research (4th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western/CENGAGE Learning.

McDaniel, C., & Gates, R. H. (1999). Contemporary Marketing Research. Cincinnati: South-Western College Pub.

Assael, H., & Keon, J. (1982). Nonsampling vs. Sampling Errors in Survey Research. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 114-123. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.cas.cz/stable/3203346

Groves, R., & Lyberg, L. (2010). TOTAL SURVEY ERROR: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 849-879. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.cas.cz/stable/40985408

Ziegenfuss, J., Beebe, T., Rey, E., Schleck, C., Locke, G., & Talley, N. (2010). Internet Option in a Mail Survey: More Harm Than Good? Epidemiology, 21(4), 585-586. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.cas.cz/stable/25680593

Renckly, T. R. Sampling Error. Retrieved September 20, 2016, from http://spectrum.troy.edu/renckly/smpl-r.htm

MKT375-2, Fall16 Ann Connolly

Hoonakker, P., & Carayon, P. (2009). Questionnaire Survey Nonresponse: A Comparison of Postal Mail and Internet Surveys. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(5), 348-373. doi:10.1080/10447310902864951

29/09/2016 29

Matzkin, R. (2007). Nonparametric Survey Response Errors. International Economic Review, 48(4), 1411-1427. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.cas.cz/stable/4542018