CUTTACK - HUDD-Government of OdishaCuttack As per the 2011 census, the population of Cuttack...

Service Level Improvement Plan (SLIP)Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT)

CUTTACK

2015

Cuttack

As per the 2011 census, the population

of Cuttack Municipal Corporation is 6.10

Lakh. The decadal growth rate of the city

is @ 14%. The population of the out

growth area is about 0.53 Lakh. The

average floating population is about

15,000. Both horizontal and vertical

growth of the city is observed during the

recent years, however, the horizontal

growth is restricted by the rivers

Mahanadi and Kathajodi. Nearby towns

like Choudwar and Jagatpurare likely to

merge in the future to provide a regional

commercial hub. It was the old capital of

Odisha till the year 1956.Cuttack is a city

of heritage importance with history of

more than 1000 years! The city is well

connected by rail and road (NH 5).

Cuttack is famous in the country and

abroad for silver filigree works by its

artisans. Cuttack is the trading hub of the

state for which it is also known as the

commercial capital of the state. With

presence of the ‘maalgowdown’, economy of the city revolves around whole sale trading.

The city has skilled manpower in the field of tourism, hospitality and handicraft. The city has also immense

potential in food processing. Surrounded by rivers there is adequate availability of potable water in Cuttack

to match national benchmark. A major integrated sewerage and storm water drainage system project for the

entire city is implemented with JAICA funding. The municipal solid waste is managed on PPP mode

including landfill and treatment. Good public transport facility with city bus service on PPP mode is

available. MRTS is proposed to connect Cuttack, Bhubaneswar, Khurda and Jatni. Educational facility in the

city is good with presence of a major medical college cum hospital, private hospitals, nursing homes,

engineering colleges and ITI centers.

In the Service Level Improvement Plan (SLIP) for Cuttack, sector-wise projects identified and the estimated

costs are: water supply- 43.nos./Rs. 382.00 Cr.; sewerage/septage- 4 nos./ Rs. 146.59 Cr.; storm water

drainage- 7 nos/ Rs. 421.75 Cr.; urban transport – 8 nos. / Rs. 43.00 Cr.; and parks – 29 nos./ Rs. 6.81 Cr.

In total 91 nos of projects have been identified with a total estimated cost of Rs. 1000.15 Crore.

Water Supply

MissionManagementInformationSystem

1.AssesstheServiceLevelGapThe first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for Water Supply(AMRUT Guidelines; para 3 & 6). This will also include existing institutional framework for thesector. AMRUT is focused on improvement in service levels. The zone wise data shall be usedin identifying the gaps. These zone-wise gaps will be added to arrive at city level service gaps.While assessing service level gap reply following questions not more than wordindicatedagainst each question

Question:What kind of baseline information is available for water supply system of the city?Detail out the data, information, plans, reports etc related to sector. Is zone wise informationavailable? (75 words)

Ans.All the base line information for W/S system such as source, distribution network, storage& service connection etc. is available. Ward wise detail data is available. Consumer and assetdatabase is maintained and updated annually. One project is ongoing under UIDSSMT forsurface source development.

Question:Haveyoucollectedcensus2011data?AreyouawareofbaselinesurveydataofMoUD?Haveyoucorrelateddatafromtheseandothersources?(75words)

Ans.The data regarding census 2011 has been collected. We havecorrelate the data withother sources before preparing the proposal.

Question:What are existing service levels for water supply in the city? What is the coverageof water supply Connections? What is per capita supply of water? How much is the extent ofmetering? How much is non-revenue water? Provide information in table.

Ans.The existing service levels for water supply to Rourkela are given below in the prescribedtable.

Table:StatusofWaterSupplyservicelevels

TABLE 1.1 : Status of Water Supply ServiceSr.No. Indicators Present status MOUD Benchmark Reliability Level

1 Coverage of water supply connections 57.3% 100% B

2 Per capita supply of water 136 135 C

3 Extent of metering of water connections 0.05% 100% D

4 Extent of non-revenue water 55.7% 20% C

5 Quality of water supplied 100.0% 100% C

6 Cost recovery in water supply services 42.5% 100% C

7 Efficiency in collection of water supplyrelated charges 83.0% 90% B

Question: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks prescribed byMoUD? (75 words)

Ans.The coverage has a gap of 42.7% for household level connectivity. Availability of water isadequate. Consumer level metering is negligible which leads to a high NRW. The cost recoveryis low and has to be enhanced to 100%. Presently the city is drawing water from groundsource. A project is ongoing under UIDSSMT to develop the surface source.

SOURCEOFWATERANDWATERTREATMENTSYSTEM.

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)following questions.

Question: What is the existing source of water? Is it surface water source or under groundwater source? What is the capacity of these sources?

Ans.The existing source of water is ground.The total capacity of the surface source is 103.12MLD. The ground source will be transited to surface source once the ongoing, Intake & WTPare completed.

Question:Isthereanytreatmentprovidedtowaterfromthesesources?Howmuchwaterisrequiredtobetreateddaily?Whatisthetreatmentcapacityinstalledinthecity?

Ans.Yes, Disinfection process is adopted for all ground source

Question: What per capita water supply in LPCD (liter per capita per day) comes out,if you divide total water supply by the total population?

Ans.136 LPCD is provided

DISTRIBUTIONZONES

Pleaseprovideinformationin150wordsontheaboverespondingto(howevernotlimitedto)following questions.

Question:CityIsdividedinhowmanyzonesforwatersupply?

Ans. City is divided into 15 Zones with 2 to 3 sub zones eackfor water supply purpose.

Question:ProvidedetailsoftotalnoofHouseholds(HH)ineachzone,noofHHwithandwithoutwatertapconnectionsintheTable

Ans:-Detailed information given below.

Table:ZoneWiseCoverageofHouseholds

TABLE 1.2: Zone wise coverage of household

ZoneNo Total No of Households Households with direct water

supply ConnectionHouseholds without direct water

supply connections

1 7414 3538 38762 7797 6992 8053 11477 3683 77944 11526 4445 70815 12140 4915 72256 11995 7122 48737 8273 3011 52628 7457 4167 32909 8532 3326 5206

10 6572 3485 308711 4478 307 417112 8395 4270 412513 4095 597 349814 3450 220 323015 3219 92 3127

Total 116820 50170 66650

STORAGEOFWATERPlease provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however notlimited to) following questions.

Question: What is the total water storage capacity in the city? What is capacity ofelevated and ground water reservoirs?

Ans. Total water storage capacity including ongoing projects=5.93ML

ESR =2.1 ML

GSR=3.83ML

Question: In case of surface water, does city need to have ground level reservoirs tostore raw treated water?

Ans: There is no requirement to store raw water since the ongoing project will source waterfrom river Mahanadiwhich is perennial. However storage capacity for treated water is required.

Question: Is water being supplied to consumers through direct pumping or throughelevated reservoirs?

Ans. Both practice are adopted as of now.

Question: Is storage capacity sufficient to meet the cities demand?

Ans.No,the storage capacity is not sufficient to meet the city demand.

DISTRIBUTIONNETWORK

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however notlimited to) following questions.

Question: What is the total length of water supply distribution pipe line laid in the city?

Ans. Total existing water supply distribution pipe line in the city is 551.09Km

Question: What is the total road length in the city? Is the pipe lines are laid in allstreets? Is the objective of universal coverage of water supply pipe line is achieved?

Ans. The city has 860.57 Km of road length.No, pipe lines are not laid in all streets for whichuniversal coverage could not be achieved

Question:Whatarethekindsofpipematerialsusedindistributionlines?

Ans. C.I, D.I., GI & UPVC

Question: Provide zone wise details of street length with and without waterdistribution lines in the Table?

Table:ZoneWiselengthofdistributionnetwork

TABLE 1.3: Zone wise length of distribution network

Zone No Total Street Length (Km) Street length with waterdistribution pipe line (Km)

Street length without waterdistribution pipe line (Km)

1 43.61 30.27 13.342 160.24 102.63 57.613 74.79 64.3 10.494 46.92 38.84 8.085 46.77 41.48 5.296 40.96 35.37 5.597 42.42 38.48 3.948 48.4 42.36 6.049 60.1 53.94 6.1610 47.59 42.02 5.5711 66.81 4.9 61.9112 56.35 31.45 24.9013 26.52 8.13 18.3914 48.62 8.81 39.8115 50.47 8.11 42.36Total 860.57 551.09 309.48

INSTITUTIONALFRAMEWORK

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however notlimited to) following questions.

Question: Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding,service provision in table

Table:Functions,roles,andresponsibilitiesPlanningandDesign

TABLE 1.4a: Functions, roles, and responsibilities Planning and Design

Planning and Design Construction/ Implementation O&M

Planning and design Cell in EIC (PH)office headed by SE(P&D) andsupported by technical cell andPDMC

Project team headed by divisional EE ofPHEO along with supervision fieldengineers (AEE/AE/JE) and supportedby PMMU and PDMC. MoU will besigned between PHEO and ULB forexecution of the project

O & M team headed by EE of PHEO andsupported by operations engineers andoperators. MoU will be signed betweenPHEO and ULB for O & M of theinfrastructure. Outsourced PPP model willalso be explored.

Question:Howcityisplanningtoexecuteprojects?

Ans. The city is planning to execute the ongoing and proposed project through a dedicated fieldsupervision team with hierarchical monitoring by PHEO.

Question: Shall the implementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation or anyparastatal body? Please refer para 8.1 of AMRUT guidelines.

Ans. It will be implemented by PHEO, a wing of H&UD Department

2.BridgetheGap

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiativesundertaken in different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developedto bridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.2 &6.3, Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of the identified objectives will be evolved from theoutcome of assessment and meeting the opportunity to bridge the gap.

Question: List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects toaddress these gaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out forsector under different schemes with status and when the existing projects arescheduled to be completed? Provide information in Table

Table: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned

TABLE 1.4b: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned projects

Sl. No. Name of Project Scheme NameCost(Cr. Rs.)

Month ofCompletion Status

1 Improvement of water supply to Cuttack(Surface source improvement) UIDSSMT 92.75 March 2019 Procurement

process initiated

Question: How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap inwater supply system? Will completion of above will improve the coverage of networkand collection efficiency? If yes, how much. (100 words)

Ans. After completion of the above project the quality of water will improve and the source ofwater will transit from ground source to surface source.

Question: Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services?What kind of services will be required to fulfill the gap?

Ans.Yes. Additional infrastructures are required to address the demand of the city. Since thecorporation area spreads across the river, it required to have New WTP, feeder main, storageand distribution to the bridge the gap and attain the benchmark levels.

Question: How does the city visualize to take the challenge to rejuvenate the projectsby changing their orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, tofocusing on optimum use of existing assets?

Ans.The service provided has in the past tried to optimally utilize the existing assets beforeproposing new assets and will continue to adopt the same principle.

Question: Has city conducted assessment of Non-Revenue Water?if yes, what istheNRW level? Is city planning to reduce NRW?

Ans. City has conducted assessment of Non-Revenue Water through indirectmethods which is approximately 55.50%. Yes the city has plans to reduce NRW byway of introduction of HH level metering, reducing illegal connections and reducingtechnical losses.

Question: Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctionedprojects, calculate existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for water supplypipe network, number of household to be provided with tap connections, and requiredenhancement in capacity of water source/ treatment plant (MLD). Gaps in watersupply service levels be provided as per Table.

TABLE 1.5: Gaps in water supply service levels

Component

2015 2021

Present Ongoingprojects Total Demand Gap

Source (MLD) -Surface Source 0 129 129 117 14

Treatment capacity (MLD) 0 129 129 117 14

Elevated Storage capacity (ML) 2.1 2.1 35 32.9

Distribution network coverage (m) 551090 551090 860570 309480

NOTE

The surface source development is proposed in the areas which are across the river and transportation of water from ongoingWTP is not possible

OBJECTIVESBased on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to achieve universalcoverage. While developing objectives following question shall be responded so as toarrive at appropriate objective.

Please provide List out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100 words.

Question: Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcomeofassessment?

Each of the objective have been evolved from the outcome assessment. Which canbe listed as follows

1. Ensure quality to water

2. Universal household level access with adequate water

3. Reduce NRW thereby increase the coverage & cost recovery

4. Ensure equity within the zones

Question:Doeseachobjectivemeettheopportunitytobridgethegap?

Ans. Yes each of the objective meets the opportunity to bridge the gaps.

3.ExamineAlternativesandEstimateCostThe objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available toaddress these gaps.. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines;Para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9). This will also include review of smart solutions. The costestimate with broad source of funding will be explored for each. While identifying thepossible activities, also examine the ongoing scheme and its solutions includingstatus of completion, coverage and improvement in O&M. Please provide informationon the above responding to (however not limited to) following questions.

Question: What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out theobjectives? (75 words)

Ans.UIDSSMT forensuring water quality from surface source

AMRUT for holistic approach to achieve universal coverage

Question: How can the activities be converged with other programme like JICA/ADBfunded projects in the city etc? (100words)

Ans.The program is being converged with UIDSSMT for source upgradation and RAY projectfor water supply to slum area.

Question: What are the options of completing the ongoing activities? (75words)

Ans.Balance funding through state budgetary support

Question: How to address the bottlenecks in the existing project and lessons learntduring implementation of these projects? (75 words)

Ans.Availability of land is the major bottleneckwhich has been specifically addressed prior topreparation of SLIP for the AMRUT projects. Technically feasible lands have been identifiedand the concerned authorities have been moved for transfer of land.

Question: What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs? (100words)

Ans.Cost recovery is being proposed by increasing the consumer base and reducing theoperational cost.

Question: Will metering system for billing introduced?

Ans. Yes.

Question: Whether reduction in O&M cost by addressing NRW levels be applied? (75 words)

Ans.Yes, O & M cost will be reduced by reducing the NRW levels.

Question: Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap?

Ans.Yes

THE ATERNATIVE ACTIVITIES TO MEET THESE ACTIVITIES BE DEFINED ASPER TABLE.

Table:AlternativeActivitiestoMeetObjectives

TABLE 1.6: Alternative Activities to Meet Objectives

Sr.No. Objective Activities Financing Source

1 Quality water supply Rehabilitation of venerable stretches AMRUT

2 Adequacy of water Treatment facility UIDSSMT,& AMRUT

3 Universal coverage Network expansion and house connection AMRUT

4 NRW reduction Consumer metering & leak reduction AMRUT

5 Cost recovery Coverage & NRW reduction

4.CitizenEngagement

ULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback on thesuggested alternatives and innovations. Each alternative will be discussed with citizens andactivities to be taken up will be prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize

these activities and their scaling up based on the available resources. (AMRUT Guidelines;Para 6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please explain followingquestions in not more than 200 words detailing outthe needs, aspirations and wishes of the local people.

Question: Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?

Ans. Yes

Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?

Ans. Yes.

Question: Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?

Ans. Yes.

Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?

Ans. The suggested alternatives quite acceptable to the stake holders

Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of consultations?

Ans. Yes, The alternatives taken up have been prioritized on the basis of consultation.

Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?

Ans.Cost benefit analysis

5. Prioritize ProjectsBased on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up basedon the available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, pleasereply following questions in not more than 200 words.

Question: What are sources of funds?

Ans. AMRUT

Question: Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?

Ans. Yes

Question: Has projects been prioritized based on more with less approach?

Ans. Yes

Question: Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed forprioritization of activities?

Ans. Yes

6.ConditionalitiesDescribe in not more than 300 words the Conditionalities of each project in terms of availabilityof land, environmental obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment,approval and permission needed to implement the project.

Ans. Lands is available for the proposed infrastructures. Environmental clearances are notrequired proposed project. Water for the 2 MLD WTP will be drawn from the existing intakewhich already has a water drawal permission. Power availability has been discussed withNESCO and agreed upon.

7.ResilienceRequired approvals will be sought from ULBs and competent authority and resilience factorwould be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable water supply scheme. Describe in notmore than 300 words regarding resilience built in the proposals.

Ans: The projects are environmentally sustainable and alsodisaster resilient.

8.FinancialPlanTotal No of Projects identified is 43 nos with an estimated cost of Rs. 381.96 Cr. is required toachieve universal coverage as envisaged under AMRUT. The completion period of this projectis planned by 2019-20. The water supply system is under parastatal agency i.e. Public HealthEngineering Organization (Urban). The ULB own generated fund is not able to cover theoperational requirements of ULB and has been depending upon the state grant for the same.Therefore, all infrastructure development projects are required to be funded by Centre/ Stategrants or loan funds by state agencies. Accordingly the present investment on the projects isplanned based on 50% fund as grant from Centre and 50% fund to be met by state grant andsome limited funds from ULB/ soft loans from financial agency like OUIDF. At the planningstage, it is not possible to identify the breakup of funding pattern for state 50 % share of fundand it is considered that this fund shall be made available from state resources. Based on theabove financial plan the specific responses to the questionnaires given in the template are asunder:

How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating infrastructureprojects?The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant. Since the ULBdo not have the financial capability, no share has been considered from ULBs.

List of individual project which is being financed by various stakeholders?All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and 50%state grant. Soft loan from funding agencies will be explored which will form part of ULBcontribution. However, the state share will not be less than 20%.

Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence andconsultation with funding partners?Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered underother scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been planned forprojects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded under AMRUT on50: 50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required. However, consultation forinvolving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the objective of the mission.

Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project has beencategorized based on financial considerations?Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to contributerequired funds for completing the projects. However, the O&M cost for these projects will bemet from internal resources including collection of user charges. The projects have beencategorized based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage as required under AMRUTscheme.

Have the financial assumptions been listed out?Yes, the financial assumption has been listed to work out the operational sustainability.

Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?Yes, the financial plan takes care of apart from infrastructure cost, the O&M requirement ofproject life cycle. It will be possible to be sustained throughout the life cycle.

Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State,ULBs and)Yes, the initial sharing of financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.

Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?Yes, it includes various ongoing projects under different schemes supported by both Central &State grant.

Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?Yes, it has been provided as per detailed furnished at table 8.1.

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5.These tables are based on Amrut guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

TABLE 2.1: Master Plan of Water Supply Projects for Mission period

Sr.No. Project Name & code Priority

numberYear in which

to beimplemented

Year in whichproposed to

be completed

EstimatedCost

(Cr. Rs.)

1 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P1(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/01) 1 15-16 16-17 2.92












13 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part A)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/13) 26 15-16 17-18 4.72

14 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part B)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/14) 27 16-17 18-19 9.79

15 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(PartA)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/15) 15 15-16 17-18 9.77


17 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part C)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/17) 17 16-17 18-19 8.14














31 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(PartB)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/31) 29 16-17 18-19 12.36



34 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z11(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/34) 14 15-16 17-18 29.57







41 Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P1(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/41) 13 15-16 17-18 9.66



TOTAL 382.00

TABLE 2.2: Master Service Level Improvement during Mission period

Sr.No. Project Name & code Physical

Component

Change in Service Levels EstimatedCost (Cr.

Rs.)IndicatorExisting After(As-Is) (To-be)

1 Improvement of WS to Cuttack - Rehabilitation P1(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/01)

Replacementpipes Quality 100%, C 100%,

A 2.92



A 3.62



A 3.46



A 3.60



A 3.61

6 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P6(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/06)


A 3.58



A 3.59



A 3.68



A 3.53



A 3.33

11 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P11(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/11) Testing lab Quality 100%, C 100%,

A 3.86

12 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P12(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/12) Metering Metering 0.05% 58.0% 37.63

13 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part A)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/13) Distribution Coverage 100.0% 4.72

14 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part B)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/14) Storage Coverage 100.0% 9.79

15 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(PartA)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/15) Distribution Coverage 100.0% 9.77

16 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part B)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/16) Distribution Coverage 100.0% 10.62

17 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part C)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/17) Storage Coverage 100.0% 8.14














31 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(PartB)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/31) Storage Coverage 100.0% 12.36



34 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z11(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/34)

Storage &Distribution Coverage 100.0% 29.57









41 Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P1(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/41)

SurfaceSourceImprovement

Adequacy 0.0% 135 9.66



Adequacy 0.0% 135 19.13



Adequacy 0.0% 135 10.59

TABLE 2.3.1a:Total Fund Sharing Pattern for water supply projects during mission period

Sr.No. Name of Project & code

Total ProjectCost

(Cr. Rs.)

Share (Amount in Cr. Rs.)

GOI State ULB Others Total

1 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P1(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/01) 2.92 1.46 1.46 2.92












13 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part A)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/13) 4.72 2.36 2.36 4.72

14 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part B)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/14) 9.79 4.90 4.90 9.79

15 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(PartA)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/15) 9.77 4.89 4.89 9.77


17 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part C)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/17) 8.14 4.07 4.07 8.14














31 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(PartB)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/31) 12.36 6.18 6.18 12.36



34 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z11(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/34) 29.57 14.79 14.79 29.57







41 Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P1(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/41) 9.66 4.83 4.83 9.66



Total 382.00 191.00 191.00 - - 382.00

TABLE 2.3.1b: Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for water supply projects

Sr.No. Name of Project & code Total Project

Cost (Cr. Rs.)Share (Amount in Cr. Rs.)

GOI State ULB Others Total













13 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part A)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/13) 4.72 - - -

14 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part B)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/14) 9.79 - - -

15 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(PartA)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/15) 9.77 - - -


17 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part C)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/17) 8.14 - - -














31 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(PartB)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/31) 12.36 - - -



34 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z11(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/34) 29.57 - - -







41 Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Headworks P1(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/41) 9.66 - - -



Total 382.00 19.11 19.11 - - 38.21

TABLE 2.3.2: Annual Fund Sharing break up for watersupply project All Amount in Crores of Rs.

Sr.No. Project Name & code GoI

State ULB

Convergence Others

Total14th Other

s Total14th Othe

rsTotalFC FC

1Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P1(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/01) 0.73 0.7

3 0.73 1.46


1 0.91 1.81


6 0.86 1.73


0 0.90 1.80


0 0.90 1.81


0 0.90 1.79


0 0.90 1.80


2 0.92 1.84


8 0.88 1.77


3 0.83 1.66


7 0.97 1.93


1 9.41 18.81

13Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part A)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/13) - - - -

14Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part B)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/14) - - - -



17Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(PartC)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/17) - - - -

















34Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z11(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/34) - - - -

35Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z12(PartA)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/35) - - - -




39Improvement of WS to Cuttack -NewZ14(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/39) - - - -

40Improvement of WS to Cuttack -NewZ15(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/40) - - - -

41Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Headworks P1(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/41) - - - -



Total 19.11 - 19.11 19.11 - - - - - 38.2

1

TABLE 2.5: Year wise Plan for Service Level Improvement

ProposedProject

ProjectCost inCr. Rs.

Indicator Baseline

Annual Targets(Increment from the Baseline Value)

FY 2016 FY FY FY FYH1 H2 2017 2018 2019 2020

OngoingunderUIDSSMT 92.75

ProposedunderAMRUT

382.00

Coverage of watersupply connections 57.3% 58% 60% 65% 70% 90% 100%

Per capita supply ofwater 136 135 135 135 135 135 135

Extent of metering ofwater connections 0.05% 1% 3% 20% 50% 90% 100%

Extent of non-revenuewater 55.7% 55% 52% 40% 30% 22% 20%

Quality of water supplied 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Cost recovery in watersupply services 42.5% 45% 50% 60% 80% 90% 100%

Efficiency in collection ofwater supply relatedcharges

83.0% 85% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Storm Water Drainage

Mission Management Information SystemI. Assess the Service Level Gap

The first step is toassess the existing situation and servicelevels gaps for StormWaterDrainage(AMRUTGuidelines; para 3 & 6). This will also include existing institutionalframeworkfor the sector. AMRUT isfocused on improvement inservicelevels.The zone wisedata shall be used in identifying the gaps. These zone-wise gapswill be added to arrive atcitylevel servicegaps.Whileassessing servicelevel gapreplyfollowing questions notmore thanwordindicated against each question.

1.2. Whatkindofbaselineinformation is available for storm water drainage system ofthe city? Detail out the data, information, plans, reports etc. related to sector. Iszone wise information available? (75 words)

DPR prepared by OWSSB by M/s STC Consortium in 2008

DPR prepared by OISIP, JICA by M/s TEC Consortium in 2011

CDP by ASCI 2008

Comprehensive Development Plan ( Master Plan) by IIT Kharagpur in 2011

City Sanitation Plan by PRUDA & AIIlSG in 2012

1.2.Haveyou collecteddata fromcensusothersources?Are you aware of baseline surveydata of MoUD?Have you correlated data from these andothersources?(75 words)

Yes, collected data from

a. District Census Office

b. Indian Meteorological Centre (IMC) Bhubaneswar

c. Water Resource Department, Orissa

d. Survey of India

e. District statistical office, Cuttack.

f. Director survey and maps Orissa Cuttack

1.3 What is existing service levels for storm water drainage in the city? What is thecoverage of drains? What are the no ofincidence of sewerage mixing in the drains? Howmany times water logging incidence happens in the city? Provide comparativeinformation of service levels (in tabulated form) with respect to the service level benchmarks prescribed by MoUD and sustainable standards for service levels under theNational Mission on Sustainable Habitat (NMSH) in table 1.1

Sr. No. Indicators Sustainablestandards

Black (Caution forimprovement)

Red(Immediate actionfor improvement)

Present Status

1 Coverage of Storm waterdrainage network 100% <75% <50% < 75 %

2 Incidence of sewerage mixingin the drains1 0% <25% <50% < 50%

3 Incidence of water logging2 (innos. per year) 0 <25 <50 < 50

Table 1.1: Status of Storm Water Level service levels

1.4: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarksprescribedbyMoUDandsustainablestandardsfor servicelevels under theNationalMission onSustainableHabitat (NMSH)?(75 words)

a. Total length of road network in the ULB – 860.57 Km

b. Total length of primary,secondary and tertiary drains - 482.11 Km

Coverage of storm water Drainage networks - Coverage = [(b/a)*100] = 56 %

Gap of 44 % with regards to benchmarks prescribed by MoUD

1.5 What are major challenge facing the city in regard to achieving these service levelbenchmarks?

The major environmental and public health problems in Cuttack are due to:

1) Storm drains which are used as sewage collection facilities.

2) Inadequate hydraulic capacity of existing drains & absence of proper drainage network.

3) Stagnation & flooding in some low lying pockets.

4) Inadequate capacity of existing Main Pumps & some sluices.

5) Absence of systematic solid waste collection and open dumping without leachate treatmentand soil cover, resulting in choking of drains and groundwater contamination,

6) Lack of financial resources and human capacity in institutions responsible for sewerage,drainage and solid waste management.

1.6: Identify gaps in capacity in managing the services efficiently and also provide aninnovative solution for efficiently managing these services.Maintenance of the Storm Water Drain (SWD) is done as in when required. Regular scheduledmaintenance of the SWD is required with necessary staff strength.

1.7: Brief the ongoing drainage projects in the city. The components included in theseprojects, how and up to what extent it will support to the drainage system of the city.Weather it address all the issues related to drainage?

Rehabilitation and Construction of Drainage Facilities of Main Drain – 16.7 Km, Sub Drain – 7Km is going on by OISIP, JICA.

No. It will not address all the issues related to drainage.

1Incidence of sewerage mixing in the drains areratio of no of households discharging wastewater directly into the drains to the total no ofhouseholds.

2 No of times water logging is reported in a year, at flood prone points in the city

2.0 Coverage of drains **Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to) followingquestions.

2.1:Describe how at present, the storm water of City is drained off? How many natural andmanmade drains are exists and their coverage with respect to road network?

Main Drain - 22 Km

Branch Drain - 29 Km

Major Surface Drain 130.34 Km

Surface Drains 300.77km

TOTAL 482.11 KmCoverage of storm water Drainage networks – 56 %

2.2 What is the capacity and condition of these drains? Is sufficient to carry the peak flow ofthe catchment/water shed?

Drains get silted up frequently due to insufficiency in channels hydraulics.

Constriction in the water way and carrying capacity of the drains, further gets aggravated assilting results in growth of weeds, shrubs, water hyacinth etc.

Some portions of drains have been narrowed by encroachments and widening of adjacentroads.

Constructions have occurred at many reaches of drains due to construction of Puccahouses. At many places restrictions exist on both banks leaving no space for periodiccleaning, maintenance and repair.

Crossing overs by Hume pipe culverts, foot bridges, low level bridges and (crossing of)water supply pipelines cause severe obstruction to flow.

Clogging of drains gets aggravated due to uncontrolled intrusion of utility services likeElectricity, Telephone Poles etc.

Many areas lack drainage channels. These result in prolonged drainage congestion andlocalized flooding.

Un-civic practice like throwing garbage into drains is rampart and there is neither safeguard nor civic awareness.

Most tributary drains are with less than adequate capacity and the water way provided ingeneral has little relation to their drainage areas.

Roads are often at a lower elevation than drain full flow level causing reverse flow of drainwater on to the roads.

At several reaches slums have developed by the side of drains and encroachment overright of way of existing drainage channels. Many of the slum areas inside the city are notprovided with drains of any sort.

2.3 Does city have separate storm water drainage network? If no, provide the informationregarding locations of gray water mixes with the existing drains in table 1.2. In case ofmixed drainage how it works in peak rainy days?

Table 1.2: Detail of Locations where storm water get mixed with sewer

2.4 In case of mixed drainage how it works in peak rainy days?

During the rainy season the drains tends to overflow. Further there are several artificialflooding created within the city which creates an Unhygienic condition in the city.

Most of the Drains have earthen bottoms and hence cleaning becomesdifficult as theoriginal bed level cannot be identified and ascertained.

The storm water is mixed with sewage and garbage which createsunacceptable aestheticsconditions and public health concerns.

3.0 Water LoggingPlease provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to) followingquestions.

3.1 Presently how the problem of water logging is handled? Is it provides the satisfactoryoutcome?

At the time of exigencies, 275 Nos ( Total 2803 HP )of moveable pumps of are to bedeployed at identified points for pumping water from M.S.W.C.s, B.S.W.C.s and low layingpockets where draining out of the storm water is feasible.

No it is not provide satisfactory outcome.

3.2 Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special focus onKey road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality (affecting 50 HH ormore) in the Table 1.2.

S.No. Area Ward no. No of pointsNo of times water logging

reported in a year ( stagnantwater for more than four hours of

a depth more than 6” )

1Key road

intersection

7

9

9

11

1. Idga&DhobaSahi Stand Post

2. BilaSahi, Shree Vihar Colony

3. Stewart Patna

4. SishuBhawan

5. BudhiThakurani Lane

30 to 40

S.No. Sewer Zone/ Ward No Location Merging with which sewer

1 Old Cuttack Zone ( Core City )( Ward 7 to 47 and 50 to 55) Chahata to Matagajpur Main Drain

2 Bidanasi ( Ward 1 to 6) Abhinaba Cuttack, CDA,Bidyadharpur River Kathajodi

3 Nimpur, Jagatpur ( Ward 48 & 49) Jagatpur Area River Mohanadi& Canal4 Gopalpur, Balikuda ( Ward 56,57,58 & 59) Phulnakhara to Balikuda River Kathajodi& Canal

13

34

35

41

4510

01

6. S.C.B. Medical Campus

7. S.C.B. Medical & Direct ofFishery

8. RahemanChhak9. Arunodaya Nagar

10. SidheswarSahi11. Chahatachhak

2Along roads

( 50 mtlength or

more)

31

31

34

36

36

38

46

46

46

51

551314

1. Radhanath Rath B.K. Road-I

2. Bikram Lodge, ThoriaSahi

3. Ranihat High School Campus

4. Chhatra Bazar High School

5. Roxy lane

6. Railway settlement House

7. Gurukhetra, Sikharpur

8. KamalakantaVidyaPitha

9. SikharpurTalaSahi

10. Gosala Lane

11. C.R.R.I. Campus12. Mahidas Bazar

13. Mehendipur

30 to 40

3Locality

(affecting 50HH or more)

1

1

7

1

3

7

7

7

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

8

9

9

10

10

10

1.BidanasiKumbharSahi (TariniVihar)

2.Bai Mundi Nursing Home

3.Uppar Police Colony

4. Krushak Bazar

5. Immampada

6. Sundei, Deula Sahi

7. Dhoba Sahi, Raghunath Jew

8. Sivajee Nagar Stand Post – I

9. Bangali Sahi Prajapita PrimarySchool

10. HatuaSahi Stand Post – I

11. HatuaSahiGada

12. In front of AkhandalamaniMandira

13. Wireless Stand Post –I

14. Chahata Nagar Stand Post

15. Matha Sahi, Tulasipur StandPost – 1

16. Satadivihar Stand Post – I

17. Godhuli lane

18. SriviharColoney

19. Ramgarh

20. Kafla Pokhari (SaitanBagicha)

21. Reba Bagicha

22. High Court Campus

30 to 40

11

11

13

13

13

14

14

14

15

15

15

15

15

18

18

21

22

22

22

22

23

24

23. Hadagadia

24. DarjiSahi (DhrubaMandir)

25. Kali Gali

26. State Co-operative Bank Field

27. Amala Club

28. Habib Pokhari

29. Jagannath Ballav, Kasi JenaHouse

30. Justice B.P. Das Residence

31. Durga Nursing Home

32. GobarGadia

33. Dear Park

34. Gorakabar

35. ChunabhatiGali

36. ChamaraSahi

37. Chandan Pokhari

38. MakarbaSahi

39. Near ManikBabu Res

40. Dhobi Lane

41. Hong Kong Hotel Lane

42. Gamamiya Gali

43. Vidya Bhawan

44. Samanta Sahi Pokhari

24

24

24

24

24

27

27

27

27

25

25

25

26

26

26

26

28

29

29

29

29

45. Brundaban Gada SamantaSahi

46. Dillip Mulia Lane

47. Haripur Pond

48. Rausapatna Pokhari

49. Tara Atta Kala

50. New Rausapatna

51. New Rausapatna Near B.Mohanty Res.

52. Near Silu Pradhan Residence

53. Buxi Pokhari, Badhei Sahi

54. Badhei Sahi, Buxi Bazar

55. Deepa Sahoo Lane, BuxiBazar

56. KhumbharSahi

57. Kathagada Sahi KumbharSahi

58. Harizan Sahi

59. Mangu Rout Lane

60. Hazari Lane

61. Jhanjirimangala Harijan Sahi(Mihir Mallick)

62. Lunia Sahi, Harijana Sahi

63. Kuni Babu Res.Jhanjirimangala

64. Dharma Dutta Pokhari

65. Pithapur Telusu Basti

66. Bhagatpur

29

30

30

30

30

30

31

31

31

31

31

31

31

31

36

36

36

36

37

37

37

67. Amiya Mohanty Lane,BamphiSahi

68. Pratap Mishra Lane,Rajabagicha

69. Pratap Mohanty Res.

70. Rajabagicha Police Colony - I

71. Dr. Amarendra Mishra Res.

72. Mali Sahi

73. Biswal Lane

74. Ranihat Harijana Sahi

75. Khuntia Lane

76. Thoria Sahi Nayak Sahi

77. Naik Sahi

78. Ghasia Sahi

79. Mini Namuna Lane

80. Mangala Temple


82. Plaza Colony

83. Bisinabar Harijana Sahi

84. Paniapada

85. ParidaSahi

86. Nila Bila Dhia Sahi

37

37

37

39

40

40

40

40

40

41

41

41

41

41

87. Matru Bhawan Stand Post – I

88. Near P.H Colony ChhatraBazar – I

89. Pareswar Sahi Temple

90. Nigamananda Matha

91. Palamandap, Jobra (NadikulaSahi)

92. Suna Babu Gali

93. Suna Babu Gali (Back Side)

94. Jobra Charigharia Sahi

95. Jobra Majhi Sahi (Ajay BeheraRes)

96. Majhi Sahi, Jobra

97. Jobra Stand Post - I

98. Mallhasahi -I

99. TalaSahi

41

42

42

42

42

42

43

43

43

44

44

44

44

45

45

45

45

45

45

100. Tinapita Sahi, Jobra

101. Near Manmohan Sahu House

102. Dhobi Sahi U.P. School

103. Rasmita Sahoo Lane

104. Kandoi House

105. Maniraj Biscuit Company

106. Maitri Vihar

107. Kaibalya Vihar

108. Ananda Vihar

109. Vikash Bhawan

110. Shyam Sundar Matha

111. Ambika Maa Mandir

112. Khannagar Crematorium

113. Khannagar

114. Gauda Sahi, Khannagar

115. P.C. Sarkar Lane

116. Surya Vihar

117. Khannagar Nua Sahi

118. Nua Sahi

46

46

46

46

46

48

48

48

48

48

49

49

49

50

50

51

51

51

51

51

119. Dula Dei Temple

120. Korapokhari

121. Kaliboda

122. Nadikula Sahi

123. Dinagadia

124. Fakirpur, Mallhasahi

125. Bhubanpur

126. Paga Sahi, Sikariapur

127. Laxmanpur

128. Fakirpur

129. Nimpur Kela Sahi

130. Nimpur Munda Sahi

131. Immampara Samal Sahi

132. Kunjabihari Lane

133. Press Colony Khapuria StandPost

134. Mattagajpur

135. Bali Sahi

136. Poporada

137. Tinigharia Nua Sahi

138. Sartol Village

139. Netaji Nagar

51

51

51

52

52

52

52

52

53

53

53

53

53

54

54

54

54

54

54

55

55

55


141. Tinigharia

142. Rajendra Nagar(SradhaNursingh Home)

143. Kazidhia

144. Sriram Nagar

145. Nirankari Ashram

146. E.S.I Hospital lane

147. Kalyan Nagar

148. Andarpur

149. Darghapatna New Colony

150. Baya Baba Matha

151. Red Cross Field

152. A.G. Colony

153. Zero Point (1 No.)

154. Nua Bazar

155. Pothapokhari

156. Nehrupalli

157. Gandhipalli

158. Debendra Nagar

159. Bidyadharpur

160. Bhadimula

161. Gopalpur NuaSahi

56

56

56

56

56

56

57

57

57

57

57

58

58

59

59

59

162. Gopalpur

163. Gopalpur Bhadei Sahi– I

164. Subhadrapur

165. Rajnagar Patna

166. Kazi Patna

167. Bhanpur

168. Pira Bazar

169. Gopalpur Behera Sahi – I

170. Srikaruan

171. Shiva Mandir

172. Pratap NagarI

173. Ram Nagar

174. Kacharamala New

175. Kacharamala

TOTAL 199

Table 1.2: Flood prone points in the city

4.0 Chocking of drainsPlease provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to) followingquestions.


S. No. Sewer Zone/Ward No Location

StretchLength

Affected (inmtrs)

1 1

1

7

1

3

7

7

7

8

8

8

8

8

8

1. Bidanasi Kumbhar Sahi (TariniVihar)

2. Bai Mundi Nursing Home

3. Uppar Police Colony

4. Krushak Bazar

5. Immampada

6. Sundei, DeulaSahi

7. Dhoba Sahi, Raghunath Jew

8. Sivajee Nagar Stand Post – I

9. Bangali Sahi Prajapita PrimarySchool

10. HatuaSahi Stand Post – I

11. Hatua Sahi Gada

12. In front of AkhandalamaniMandira

13. Wireless Stand Post –I

14. Chahata Nagar Stand Post

15. Matha Sahi, Tulasipur StandPost – 1

16. Satadi vihar Stand Post – I

100

120

110

90

80

150

150

120

130

160

160

200

8

8

9

9

10

10

10

11

11

13

13

13

14

14

14

17. Godhuli lane

18. Srivihar Coloney

19. Ramgarh

20. Kafla Pokhari (SaitanBagicha)

21. Reba Bagicha

22. High Court Campus

23. Hadagadia

24. Darji Sahi (Dhruba Mandir)

25. Kali Gali

26. State Co-operative BankField

27. Amala Club

28. Habib Pokhari

29. Jagannath Ballav, Kasi JenaHouse

30. Justice B.P. Das Residence

31. Durga Nursing Home

32. Gobar Gadia

33. Dear Park

34. Gorakabar

35. Chunabhati Gali

36. Chamara Sahi

37. Chandan Pokhari

38. Makarba Sahi

180

120

140

180

150

180

160

120

80

90

200

100

120

15

15

15

15

15

18

18

21

22

22

22

22

23

24

24

24

39. Near Manik Babu Res

40. Dhobi Lane

41. Hong Kong Hotel Lane

42. Gamamiya Gali

43. Vidya Bhawan

44. Samanta Sahi Pokhari

45. Brundaban GadaSamantaSahi

46. Dillip Mulia Lane

47. Haripur Pond

48. Rausapatna Pokhari

49. Tara Atta Kala

50. New Rausapatna

51. New Rausapatna Near B.Mohanty Res.

52. Near Silu PradhanResidence

53. Buxi Pokhari, Badhei Sahi

54. Badhei Sahi, Buxi Bazar

55. DeepaSahoo Lane, BuxiBazar

56. KhumbharSahi

57. KathagadaSahiKumbharSahi

58. Harizan Sahi

59. Mangu Rout Lane

60. Hazari Lane

150

160

120

140

160

180

110

80

90

90

120

150

140

24

24

24

27

27

27

27

25

25

25

26

26

26

26

61. Jhanjirimangala Harijan Sahi(Mihir Mallick)

62. Lunia Sahi, Harijana Sahi

63. Kuni Babu Res.Jhanjirimangala

64. Dharma Dutta Pokhari

65. Pithapur Telusu Basti

66. Bhagatpur

67. Amiya Mohanty Lane,BamphiSahi

68. Pratap Mishra Lane,Rajabagicha

69. Pratap Mohanty Res.

70. Rajabagicha Police Colony -I

71. Dr. Amarendra Mishra Res.

72. Mali Sahi

73. Biswal Lane

74. Ranihat Harijana Sahi

75. Khuntia Lane

76. Thoria Sahi Nayak Sahi

77. Naik Sahi

78. Ghasia Sahi


80. Mangala Temple

160

180

190

120

110

110

140

170

160

180

190

100

120

110

28

29

29

29

29

29

30

30

30

30

30


82. Jitu Mulia residenceMahatab road

83. Plaza Colony

84. Bisinabar Harijana Sahi

85. Paniapada

86. Parida Sahi

87. Nila Bila Dhia Sahi

88. Matru Bhawan Stand Post –I

89. Near P.H Colony ChhatraBazar – I

90. Pareswar Sahi Temple

91. Nigamananda Matha

92. Palamandap, Jobra(NadikulaSahi)

93. SunaBabuGali

94. SunaBabuGali (Back Side)

95. Jobra Charigharia Sahi

96. Jobra Majhi Sahi (AjayBehera Res)

90

80

150

150

120

130

160

160

200

180

120

140

31

31

31

31

31

31

31

31

36

36

36

36

37

37

97. Majhi Sahi, Jobra

98. Jobra Stand Post

99. Mallha sahi

100. Tala Sahi

101. Tinapita Sahi, Jobra

102. Near Manmohan ShauHouse

103. Dhobi Sahi U.P. Schoo

104. Rasmita Sahoo Lane

105. Kandoi House

106. Maniraj Biscuit Company

107. Maitri Vihar

108. Kaibalya Vihar

109. Ananda Vihar

110. Vikash Bhawan

180

150

180

160

120

80

90

200

100

120

150

37

37

37

37

39

40

40

40

40

40

111. Shyam Sundar Matha

112. Ambika Maa Mandir

113. Khannagar Crematorium

114. Khannagar

115. GaudaSahi, Khannagar

116. P.C. Sarkar Lane

117. Surya Vihar

118. Khannagar Nua Sahi

119. Nua Sahi

120. Dula Dei Temple

121. Korapokhari

122. Kaliboda

123. Nadikula Sahi

124. Dinagadia

125. Fakirpur, Mallhasahi

126. Bhubanpur

127. PagaSahi, Sikariapur

128. Laxmanpur

129. Fakirpur

130. Nimpur Kela Sahi

160

120

140

160

180

110

140

80

90

90

120

150

140

41

41

41

41

41

41

42

42

131. Nimpur Munda Sahi

132. Immampara Samal Sahi

133. Kunjabihari Lane

134. Press Colony KhapuriaStand Post

135. Mattagajpur

136. Bali Sahi

137. Poporada


139. Sartol Village

140. Netaji Nagar


142. Tinigharia

143. Rajendra Nagar(SradhaNursingh Home)

144. Kazidhia

145. Sriram Nagar

146. Nirankari Ashram

147. E.S.I Hospital lane

148. Kalyan Nagar

149. Andarpur

150. Darghapatna New Colony

160

180

190

120

110

110

140

170

160

42

42

42

43

43

43

44

44

44

44

45

45

45

45

151. Baya Baba Matha

152. Red Cross Field

153. A.G. Colony

154. Zero Point (1 No.)

155. Nua Bazar

156. Pothapokhari

157. Nehrupalli

158. Gandhipalli

159. Debendra Nagar

160. Bidyadharpur

161. Bhadimula

162. Gopalpur Nua Sahi

163. Gopalpur

164. Gopalpur Bhadei Sahi– I

165. Subhadrapur

166. Rajnagar Patna

167. Kazi Patna

168. Bhanpur

169. Pira Bazar

170. Gopalpur Behera Sahi – I

171. Srikaruan

172. Shiva Mandir

180

190

100

120

110

90

80

150

150

45

45

46

46

46

46

46

48

48

48

48

48

49

49

49

173. Pratap NagarI

174. Ram Nagar

175. Kacharamala New

176. Kacharamala

120

130

160

160

200

180

120

140

180

150

180

160

50

50

51

51

51

51

51

51

51

51

52

52

52

52

52

53

120

80

90

200

100

120

150

160

120

140

160

180

110

53

53

53

53

54

54

54

54

54

54

55

55

55

56

56

56

56

56

80

90

90

120

150

140

160

180

190

120

110

110

140

170

160

56

57

57

57

57

57

58

58

59

59

59

180

190

100

120

110

90

80

150

150

120

130

160

160

200

180

120

140

180

150

180

160

120

80

90

200

100

120

150

160

120

140

Table 1.2:

Detail of Locations prone to chocking of drains due to solid waste

4.2 How presently the problem is addressed?City Health Officer (CHO), CMC remain full in charge of control room of Health Section, Cleaningof chock/blockage of drain during heavy rain, cleaning of all drain etc. for free flow of stormwater. All health wing personnel namely Sanitary Inspectors, Jamadar, Mates, Coolies ,Sweepers etc. working under him in readiness during the time of rain and assist CHO & carry outinstruction as and when required.

5.0 Institutional FrameworkPlease provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to) followingquestions.

5.1Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding, service provisionin table 1.3. Is it in accordance with the AMRUT guidelines (Clause 8.1)?

Planning and Design Construction/ Implementation O&M

Private Consultant on hire basis/ PMU Cell 1.Cuttack Municipal Corporation

2. Drainage Division , W.R.Dept., Cuttack

Cuttack Municipal Corporation

Table 1.3: Functions, roles, and responsibilities

5.2How city is planning to execute projects?Cuttack Municipal Corporation &Drainage Division, W.R. Dept., Cuttack will execute the work throughE-Tendering as per OPWD Code & OMC Act. & Rule

5.3Shall the implementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation? If no, weatherresolution has been passed by the Municipal Corporation and accordingly, a tripartiteMemorandum of Understanding (MoU) between State Government, Municipal Corporationand Parastatal has been signed?Please refer para 8.1 of AMRUT guidelines.

Yes, it had been passed by the council resolution for implementation of above project to bedone by Municipal Corporation.

II. Bridge the GapOnce the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiatives undertaken indifferent ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to achieveuniversal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.2 & 6.3, Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of the identifiedobjectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment and meeting the opportunity to bridge thegap.

1.1 List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to address thesegaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out for sector underdifferent schemes with status and when the existing projects are scheduled to becompleted? Provide information in Table

S.No.

Name of Project SchemeName Cost Month of

Completion

Status(as on ddmm

2015)

1. Construction and Rehabilitation ofDrainage Facilities in Cuttack

( OWSSB/JICA/OISIP/04)

JICA Rs 659.11Crores

36 month 20 %

Table 1.4: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned

1.2 How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap in storm water drainagesystem? Will completion of above improve the coverage of network; eliminate the chockingof drains and water stagnation problem? If yes, how much. (100 words)The existing system will able to address only 50 percent of the gap in storm water drainagesystem, Yes completion of above will improve additional 20 percent of the coverage of drainagenetwork and eliminate the chocking of drains and water stagnation problem.

1.3 Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services? What kind ofservices will be required to fulfill the gap?Yes, the city requires additional infrastructures like construction of new storm water drains, Sluicegate and Pumping Stations to fulfill the Gap.

1.4 How does the city visualizeto take the challenge to rejuvenate the projects by changingtheir orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, to focusing onoptimum use of existing assets?It is require rejuvenating the open drains to Covered drains without change of their orientation, sothat it will focus the optimum usage of existing assets.

1.5 Has city conducted assessment of O&M cost of drains and potable pumps? if yes, what isit? Is city planning to reduce it?Yes, CMC has conducted the assessment of O&M cost of drains and potable pumps. It is approx.4 Crore, Yes the CMC is trying to reduce it.

1.6 Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned projects,calculate existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for Rejuvenation of existing drains,construction of new primary and secondary drains, construction of pump house withpumping machinery, covering of drains. Gaps in Storm water drainage service levels areprovided as per Table 1.5.


Component2015 2021

Present Ongoingprojects Total Demand Gap

Major Drains (new construction) 480.11 24

Network requirement to provide properdrainage to all identified water stagnantpoint/ flooding points up to the end dischargepoint (in Km)Network length where householdsdischarging wastewater directly into thedrainsRejuvenation of existing primary drains andprimary drains including covering andinstallation of filter

1.8 Whether these gaps presented in measurable/ execution able ways considering all theongoing projects? (75 words)

2.0 ObjectivesBased on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage. Whiledeveloping objectives following question shall be responded so as to arrive at appropriate objective.

2.1 Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment?

Yes, the objective has been evolved from the SLB assessment which tries to fill the gap inorder to achieve the 100% universal coverage.

2.2 Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap?Yes, all the objectives has been derived keeping in mind the existing opportunities which would

probably try to bridge the existing gap in order to achieve the 100% universal coverage.

2.3 Does objectives clearly address all these gaps /solution to all the problems related tostorm water drainage of the city?

Yes, each of the objective has been formulated in order to bridge the existing gap and findsolution to all the problems related to storm water drainage of the city.

Please provide List out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 150 words.

III.Examine Alternatives and Estimate CostThe objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to addressthesegaps.These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUTGuidelines; Para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9).Thiswill also include review of smart solutions. The cost estimate with broad source of funding will beexplored for each. While identifying the possible activities, also examine the ongoing scheme and itssolutions including status of completion, coverage and improvement in O&M. Please provideinformation on the above responding to (however not limited to) following questions.

1.1 Does all these gaps clearly identified and addressed? (75 words)Yes. The detail estimate with source of funding have been identified for the SWD which can someextent improvise the present scenario of expectation with greater utility.

1.2 What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out the objectives? (75words)

The possible activities are as follows:

1) Construction of RCC drain with cover slabs

2) Renovation and repair of the existing drains

3) Construction of sluice gate and pumping stations

4) Desilting of existing drains

5) Running of Pumps during the storms.

The sources of funding are from Central, State and ULB concerned.

1.3 How can the activities be converged with other programme like JICA/ ADBfunded/SBM/Smart city mission projects in the city etc.? (i.e. convergence with otherschemes)(100 words)

The activities are covered with the

1.4 What are the options (financial alternatives) of completing the ongoing activitiesspecially on going JnNURM projects? (75 words)Cuttack is not covered under theJnNURM Project.

1.5 What are the lessons learnt during implementation of similar projects? (100 words)There has been an issue related to execution of the similar project. There exists local and site specificissues. Further there are also encroachment & eviction of the property adjacent to the SWD.

Also there are various service lines like cable line/ service lines/ phone line laid with the SWD whichcreates an unnecessary delay in O&M and also renovation of the SWD. Also, there has been shortageof staff, lack of skilled personnel, training. The ULB also need proper capacity building for the staffsand the service providers who can improvise the day to day activities. It is felt that Covering of drainsis very necessary for maintaining heiginec. Further it helps in maintenance as scope of desilting isreduced considerably.

1.6 Have you analyzed best practices and innovative solutions in sector? Is any of thepractice be replicated in the city?(75 words)1.6.1 Desilting and cleaning of the drains periodically.1.6.2 Construction of new drains as per requirements.1.6.3 Renovation of old drains.1.6.4 De-watering the storm water by pumps during heavy rains.1.6.5 New pumping stations has to be developed in the water logging / low lying areas.

1.6.6 Construction of sluice gates at the MSWC( Main storm water channel) and rivers.

The above practices are replicated in our city, but due to cuttack is encircled with thetwo rivers like Mahanadi and Kathajodi, the drain water has not drained easily duringrainy season.

1.7 What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs?(100 words)There is need of creation of Awareness among the people. Further there it is needed to cover

the drains and there should be Adequate design / renovation of the existing drains.

1.8 Whether reduction in O&M cost by energy efficient pumps etc be applied?(75 words)Yes , CMC is using the energy efficient pumps to reduce the O&M cost .

1.9 Are different options of PPP such as Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT), Design BuiltFinance Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) are considered?(100 words)

The alternative activities to meet these activities be defined as per Table 1.6

IV. Citizen EngagementULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback on thesuggested alternatives and innovations. Each alternative will be discussed with citizens andactivities to be taken up will be prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize theseactivities and their scaling up based on the available resources. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.6, 6.7& 7.2). Please explain following questions in not more than 200 words detailing out the needs,aspirations and wishes of the local people.

1.1 Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?All the major stakeholder has been included in the consultancy workshop. This includes socialworkers, advocates, senior citizen, social activist, media persons, council members etc.

1.2 Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?Yes, Ward levelconsultations held in the city, however the ward council members were present inthe consultancy workshop.

1.3 Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?Yes, the alternative has been proposed above the crowd source.

1.4 What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?Yes. Most of the feedback / suggestion has been incorporated.

Sr.No. Objective Activities Financing

Source

1.5 Is any new potential alternative is received? If so, how it is addressed?No

1.6 Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of consultations?Yes alternatives has been received &hasbeen taken up for discussion and implementation

1.7 What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?Our approach has been taken up with the consideration of prioritizing the more problematic

area with less problematic area as the city is flood affected.

V. Prioritize ProjectsBased on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on theavailable resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please reply followingquestions in not more than 200 words.

1.1 What are sources of funds?

The major sources of State fund / ULB fund/ finance commission fund (central)

1.2 Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?

Yes. But partly and indirectly with the Solid Waste Management, for choking of the drains

1.3Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?

Our approach has been taken up with the consideration of prioritizing the more problematic area withless problematic area as the city is flood affected.

1.4 Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed for prioritization ofactivities?

Yes, we have taken up approach to completely solve (Universal coverage that is 100% coverage)the problem of SWD.

VI. ConditionaltiesDescribe in not more than 300 words the Conditionalities of each project in terms of availability ofland, environmental obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment, approval andpermission needed to implement the project. ** (Plz : attach pages)

As the project is for Storm Water Drainage so no major land is required. However, it isnecessary for the pump house. There is requirement of environmental clearance and the NOC for theoutfall points.

The financial commitment, approval and permission isneeded to implement the project from theconcerned department.

VII. ResilienceRequired approvals will be sought from ULBs and competent authority and resilience factor would bebuilt in to ensure environmentally sustainable storm water drainage scheme. Describe in not morethan 300 words regarding resilience built in the proposals. ** (Plz : attach pages)

The BOD and the COD of the storm water should be lower down to the required level so that it doesn’taffect the nearby environment.

Further, necessary ground water recharge for the area should be considered.

VIII. Financial PlanOnce the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in terms of capitalcost and O&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.5) Based on the investmentrequirements, different sources of finance have to be identified. Financial Plan for the complete lifecycle of the prioritized development will be prepared. (AMRUTGuidelines; para 4, 6.6, 6.12, 6.13 &6.14). The financial plan will include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State andCity) including financial convergence with various ongoing projects. While preparing finance planplease reply following questions in not more than 250 words

How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creatinginfrastructure projects?The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant. Since the ULBdo not have the financial capability, no share has been considered from ULBs.

List of individual projects which are being financed by various stakeholders?All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and 50%state grant. Soft loan from funding agencies will be explored which will form part of ULBcontribution. However, the state share will not be less than 20%.

Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence andconsultation with funding partners?Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered underother scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been planned forprojects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded under AMRUT on50: 50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required. However, consultation forinvolving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the objective of the mission.



Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?Yes, the financial plan takes care of apart from infrastructure cost, the O&M requirement ofproject life cycle. It will be possible to be sustained throughout the life cycle.

Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State,and ULBs)Yes, the initial sharing of financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.

Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?Yes, it includes various ongoing projects under different schemes supported by both Central &State grant.

Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?Yes, it has been provided as per detailed furnished at table 1.7

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 1.7,1.8,1.9,1.10 and 1.11. These tables arebased on AMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2,2.3.1,2.3.2, and 2.5.

Table 1.7 Master Plan of Storm Water Drainage Projects for Mission period (As per Table2.1of AMRUT guidelines)

Sr No Project Name Prioritynumber

Year in which tobe implemented

Year in whichproposed to be

completed

EstimatedCost

1 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in zone 2AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/02

1 2015-16 2016-17 36.22

2 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in Zone-2AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/03

2 2016-17 2017-18 46.47


3


4 2017-18 2018-19 196.69


5

6 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in Zone-6AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/06

6 2018-19 2018-19 99.76

7 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in Zone-7AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/07

7 2019-20 2019-20 42.61

Grant Total 421.75

Table 1.7 Master Plan of Storm Water Drainage Projects for Mission period (As per Table2.1of AMRUT guidelines)

Sr.No Project Name Physical ComponentChange in Service Levels

EstimatedCostIndicator Existing

As-IsAfterto Be

1Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack

City in zone 2AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/02

1. Construction of coveredstorm water drainagenetwork.2. Renovation of ExistingDrains3. Construction of wet well.4. Construction of PumpingStation and erection ofpumping arrangment.

Coverage Drainage Network 80.23% 100%

36.22Incidence of Water Logging 1 0


City in Zone-2AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/03




















City in Zone-6AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/06





City in Zone-7AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/07




Table1.9 Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for Storm Water Projects

(As per Table 2.3.1of AMRUT guidelines)

Sr. No Name of Project Financial YearTotal

ProjectCost

ShareTotal

GoI State ULB Others

1 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in zone2, AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/02 2015-16 36.22 18.11 18.11 36.22

2 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City inZone-2, AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/03 2016-17 22.79 11.39 11.39




6 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City inZone-6, AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/06 2018-19 99.76 49.88 49.88

7 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City inZone-7, AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/07 2019-20 42.61 21.30 21.30

Total 421.75 210.88 210.88 36.22

Table 1.10 Annual Fund Sharing Break-up for Storm Water Drainage Projects

(As per Table 2.3.2 of AMRUT Guidelines)

Sr.No.

Project GoIState ULB

Convergence Others Total14th

FCOthers Total 14th

FCOthers Total

1

2

3

4

5

Total

Table 1.11 Year wise Plan for Service Levels Improvements(As per Table 2.5 of AMRUT guidelines)

Sl.NoProposed

ProjectCost in Cr.

Indicator BaseLine

PresentStatus Gap

FY2016FY 2017 FY

2018FY

2019 FY 2020H1 H2

1

421.75

Coverage of Storm Water DrainageNetwork 100% 59% 41% 0% 61.21% 62.35% 83.38% 94.19% 100.00%

2 Incidence of Water Logging 0 7 7 6 4 3 2 0

Sewerage

Mission Management Information System

1. Assess the Service Level Gap

The first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps forSewerage (AMRUT Guidelines; para 3 & 6). This will also include existinginstitutional framework for the sector. For this City has to review all policy, plans,scheme documents etc. to identify service level gaps and hold discussions withofficials and citizens. AMRUT is focused on improvement in service levels. Thezone wise data shall be used in identifying the gaps. These zone-wise gaps will beadded to arrive at city level service gaps. While assessing service level gap replyfollowing questions not more than word indicated against each question.

Question: What kind of baseline information is available for sewerage system of thecity? Detail out the data, information, plans, reports etc related to sewerageavailable with city? Is zone wise information available? Have you correlated yourdata with census 2011 data? (100 words)

Ans. Census 2011 & CDP are available and have been correlated with census2011 data.

Question: What are existing service levels for sewerage for coverage of seweragenetwork services, efficiency of collection of sewerage and efficiency in treatment. Provideinformation in table

Table 2.1 : Status of sewerage network and Service l evels

Sr. No Indicators Existing Service level MOUD Benchmark

1 Coverage of latrines(individual or community) 84% 100%

2 Coverage of sewerage network services 15% 100%

3 Efficiency of collection of sewerage 15% 100%

4 Efficiency in Treatment: Adequacy of seweragetreatment capacity 37% 100%

Question: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks prescribedby MoUD? (75 words)

Ans: The gap in said table is self explanatory. The septage management is not upto mark.

Question: Does city has separate drainage system or sewer lines take care of stormwater? (50 words)Ans: Yes, the city is having partly separate drainage system.

Coverage of latrines (individual or community), Please provide information in

Table 2.2 A

ZoneNo

Total number of HH(a)

Total number of HH without individual orcommunity toilets within walking distance (b) Coverage of latrines (%),(a-b)/a*100%

1 3635 582 84%2 22445 3591 84%3 71794 11487 84%4 7797 1248 84%

Total 105671 16908 84

SEWERAGE NETWORK AND COLLECTION OF SEWERAGE

Question: How much of the area of the city is covered by sewerage network? What isthe status of household connections in each zone? What are the areas covered underSeptage? Provide information in Table

Table 2.2 b : Sewerage network and collection of sewage

Zone NoTotal No. of

Households(HH)a

Households with SewerageNetwork

b

Coverage of seweragenetwork services

(b/a)*100%

1 3635 0 02 22445 0 03 71794 0 04 7797 4527 58

Total 105671 4527

Question: Are there any areas where sewer lines have been laid but still householdsare not connected to sewer lines? Are there any areas where toilets may beconnected to sewer lines but kitchen or bathroom waste are not connected tosewerage system? (75 words)

Ans: Such condition does not arise.

Question: Is there any systematic and organized method to collect and treat wastefrom septic tanks? What is the duration of cleaning of septic tanks (monthly, quarterly,semiannually or annually)? Indicate status of overflows of septic tanks, either in thenearby drains /open fields/ sewerage lines etc? (75 words)

Ans: At present there is no systematic and organized method to collect and treat wastefrom septic tanks. Only 5 ( Five) nos. of Cess Pool emptier are available which is not sufficient forsystematic and organized cleaning. As there is no organized method of collection inmany of the cases, the septic tanks overflow either into nearby drains/open fieldsetc.

Question: What is the situation of O&M of the existing sewerage system? Does the cityhas routine maintenance system or breakdown maintenance system? What is theduration of cleaning of sewer lines (monthly, quarterly, semiannually or annually)?Indicate infrastructure available for O&M of the sewerage system i.e sewer jettingmachines etc? (100 words)

Ans: O&M of the existing sewerage system is just manageable.

SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM

Question: Does city has Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)? Which areas are coveredunder each of the STPs? Provide details in Table 2.3

Table 2.3: Status of Existing STPs :

Sr. No Location zone Capacity (MLD) Inflow in the STP (MLD) Efficiency in %

1 NIL

2 NIL

3 3 33

4 NIL

Question: Does decentralized waste treatment system exists or planned in the city?If yes, provide details (75 words)

Ans: One no STP of 33 MLD exists in the city.

Question: How much of sewerage is generated in the city? How much of this seweragegenerated reaches the STPs? What is the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) of incomingand outgoing sewage of each STP? (100 words)

Ans: Around 70 MLD sewage is generated out of which 33 MLD reaches the STP. BiologicalOxygen Demand (BOD) of incoming and outgoing sewage of STP are around 200 and20 respectively..

Question: Is treated sewage being reused or recycled? Is treated water being used forirrigation or industrial purpose? Does the option of power generation being explored?(75 words)

Ans: No.

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

Question: Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding,service provision in table

Table: 2.4: Functions, roles, and responsibilities

Planning andDesign Construction/Implementation O & M

Planning anddesign Cell in MSof OWSSB

Project team headed by divisional PE OWSSBsupported by PMU and PDMC . There will be MoUbetween Municipal Corporation and State Govt/ OWSSBfor implementation.

O & M team headed by MunicipalEngineer of Cuttack MuncipalCorporation .

Question: Please also detail that how city is planning to execute projects. Shall theimplementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation or any parastatal body?(75 words)

Ans: Implementation of project will done by Orissa Water Supply & Sewerage Board

2. BRIDGE THE GAP

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiativesundertaken in different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed tobridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.2 & 6.3,Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of the identified objectives will be evolved from theoutcome of assessment and meeting the opportunity to bridge the gap.

Question: List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects toaddress these gaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out forsewerage system under different schemes with status and when the existing projectsare scheduled to be completed? Provide information in Table

Table: 2.5 Status of Ongoing/ SanctionedSr. No Name of Project Scheme name Cost in Rs Cr Month of completion Status (as on dd mm

2015Zone 1

886.46 50 % completedZone 2Zone 4

Zone 3 72.22 33 mld existing, 16 mldin progress

Total 958.68

Question: How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap insewerage system? Will completion of above will improve the coverage of network andcollection efficiency? If yes, how much. (100 words)

Ans: The existing system will be able to address the existing gap by around 25%.Completion of proposed project will improve the coverage of network and collectionefficiency by 90 %.

Question: Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services? Whatkind of services will be required to fulfill the gap?

Ans: Yes, the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services. It needssewerage system and treatment.

Question: How does the city visualize to take the challenge to rejuvenate the projectsby changing their orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, tofocusing on optimum use of existing assets?

Table 2.6: Demand Gap Assessment.

Component2015 2021

Existing Ongoingprojects Total Demand Gap

Sewerage net work km 68 379.165 447.2 515.165 68

No of Households covered undersewerage system (2021 demand) 4527 0 4527 136584 132057

Sewerage treatment plant MLD (2030demand) 33 52 85 89.2 4.2

Note: The demand gap will be fulfilled as per requirement of CPHEEO Mannual.

Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned projects,calculate existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for sewerage network, number ofhousehold to be provided with connections, and required enhancement in capacity ofSTP (MLD), area to be covered under septage management. Based on the demand andgap assessment, evolve objectives to achieve bridging this gap.Question: Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome ofassessment?

Ans: Yes

Question: Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap? Please provideList out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100 words.

Ans: Yes, each objective meets the opportunity to bridge the gap.

3. EXAMINE ALTERNATIVES AND ESTIMATE COST

The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available toaddress these gaps. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines;Para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9). This will also include review of smart solutions. The cost estimatewith broad source of funding will be explored for each alternative. While identifying thepossible activities, also examine the ongoing scheme and its solutions including statusof completion, coverage and improvement in O&M. Please reply following questions innot more than 200 words.

Question: What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out theobjectives?

Ans: The activities are sewer net work, treatment and house connection to meet the objectivefor universal coverage of sewerage system.

Question: How can the activities be converged with other programmes like JICA/ ADBfunded projects in the city etc?

Ans: yes.

Question: What are the options of completing the ongoing activities?

Ans: here does not arise. But done Through State Govt and other funding.

Question: How to address the bottlenecks in the existing project and lessons learntduring implementation of these projects?

Ans: The bottlenecks that is disposal arrangements, reuse of treated waste water etc learnthave been addressed and shall be taken care during implementation of these projectsunder AMRUT.

Question: Has projects includes O&M of sewerage system?

Ans: Yes.

Question: What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs? Can the option ofsale of treated wastewater be applicable to recover the O&M cost.

Ans: Collection of new connection fees and monthly sewerage fees.

Question: What are innovative alternative solutions explored in achieving objectives?

Ans: Options for STP methodology and reuse of treated waste water have been explored inachieving objectives.

Question: Are different options of PPP such as Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT),Design Built Finance Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) are considered?

Ans: Yes, Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT) will be considered.

Question: How the recycle and reuse of waste water will be done? How much quantity oftreated water may be reused?

Ans: Does not arise.

Question: Have you analysed best practices and innovative solutions in seweragesector? Is any of the practice be replicated in the city?

Ans: Yes.

Question: Have you identified the areas for decentralized waste treatmentsystem? Explore the approaches for septage management i.e PeoplePublic Private Partnership (PPPP) model or replacing septic tanks by bio-digesters, bioremediation etc.

Ans: Decentralized waste treatment system provided.

The alternative activities to meet these activities be defined as per Table 2.7

Table2.7 Alternative Activities To Meet Objectives

Sl. No Objective Activities Financing Source

1 Universal coverage withsewerage system

Sewerage system and construction of STP, re useof treated waste water. AMRUT

4. CITIZEN ENGAGEMENTEach alternative will be discussed with citizens and activities to be taken upwill be prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize theseactivities and their scaling up based on the available resources. (AMRUTGuidelines; Para6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please reply following questions in not more than 200words.

Question: Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?

Ans: Yes

Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?

Ans: Yes

Question: Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?

Ans: Yes through website.

Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?

Ans: Proposed proposal is well appreciated.

Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis ofconsultations?

Ans: Yes.

Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?

Ans: Keeping in mind how the house holds can be well covered under sewerage facilities optedfor achieving early coverage of the gap assessed under AMRUT.

5. PRIORITIZE PROJECTS

Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based onthe available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please replyfollowing questions in not more than 200 words.

Question: What are sources of funds?

Ans: State Govt. fund/ Govt. of India fund

Question: Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?

Ans: Yes

Question: Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?

Ans: Yes.

Question: Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed forprioritization of activities?

Ans: Yes.

6. CONDITIONALITIES

Describe the Conditionalities of each project in terms of availability of land, environmentalobligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment, approval and permissionneeded to implement the project. Please reply following questions in not more than 100 words.

Ans: Govt land has been identified and available. Envoronmental clearance applied and otherclearances / NOC are under process.

7. RESILIENCE

Required approvals will be sought from competent authority and organisations. The resiliencefactor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable sewerage scheme. Please replyfollowing questions in not more than 100 words.

Ans: The proposed project under AMRUT and ongoing/ sanctioned would be built-in to ensureenvironmentally sustainable sewerage scheme. Also Odisha State Pollution Board requirementsshall be adhered to.

8. FINANCIAL PLAN

Once the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in terms ofcapital cost and O&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.5) Based on theinvestment requirements, different sources of finance have to be identified. Financial Plan for thecomplete life cycle of the prioritized development will be prepared. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 4,6.6, 6.12, 6.13 & 6.14). The financial plan will include percentage share of different stakeholders(Centre, State and City) including financial convergence with various ongoing projects. Whilepreparing finance plan please reply following questions in not more than 200 words

Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?

Yes, projects proposed include O&M for 5 years. O&M shall be integral part of theexecution contract so that the agency/contractor who develops the assets shall beresponsible for post asset creation O&M for 5 years. The O&M cost for Water Supplyshall be borne by the OWSSB (Odisha Water Supply and Sewerage Board).

Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre,State, ULBs and)

Yes, the financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.

Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?

Yes, it includes convergence with various ongoing projects under different schemessupported by both Central & State grant.

Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?

Yes, it has been provided as per detailed furnished at table 8.1

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5. These tablesare based on AMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

Table 8.1 Master Plan of Sewerage Projects for Mission period

Sr. No.Project Name and Code6 (list all projects to

achieve universal coverage in the Cityseparately for water supply and sewerage

Infrastructure ImprovementChange in Service Levels Estimated Cost

Prioritynumber

Year in which tobe implemented

Year in whichproposed to be

completed(Amount in Rs.

Cr.)

1Sewerage System for CUTTACK , Zone 1 –Sewer network AMRUT/OD/ CUTTACK/SG/01

3 2016-17 2017-18 139.42

2 Septage Management for CUTTACKAMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/02 1 2015-16 2015-16 1.86



Grand Total Total AMRUT 146.59

on going 958.68

Table 8.2: Master Service Levels Improvements during Mission Period

(As per Table 2.2 of AMRUT guidelines)

Sl.No. Project Name and code7

Infrastructure Improvement

Physical components

Change in Service Levels EstimatedCost

IndicatorExisting After (Amount in

Rs. Cr)

(As-is) (To-be)

1Sewerage System for CUTTACK, Zone 1 – Sewer networkAMRUT/OD/ CUTTACK /SG/01

Sewer network &house connection

a .Coverageb. Collectionefficiency

0% 100% 139.42

2Septage Management forCUTTACKAMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/02

FSM work Collection &Treatment 0% 100% 1.86





Total 146.59

Table 8.3 Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for Sewerage Projects

SectorTotal

Projectcost

Share

GoI State ULB Others(OUIDF )

Total inCr

Sewerage and Septage management

Proposed ProjectsSewerage System for CUTTACK , Zone 1 – Sewernetwork AMRUT/OD/ cUTTACK /SG/01 139.42 0 0 0

Septage Management for CUTTACKAMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/02 1.86 0.93 0.93 1.86



Total 7.17

Table 8.4: Annual Fund Sharing Break-up for Sewerage ProjectsSr.

Project GoI

State ULB

Conv

erge

nce

Othe

rs Total inCrNo. 14th

FC Others Total

14th F

C

Othe

rs

Total

1Sewerage System forCUTTACK , Zone 1 – Sewernetwork AMRUT/OD/cUTTACK /SG/01

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0


0.93 0.93 0.93 1.86


0.97 0.97 0.97 1.94


1.69 1.69 1.69 3.37

Total 7.170

Table 8.5:Year wise Plan for Service Levels Improvements

(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)

Proposed ProjectsTotal

ProjectCost in Cr

Indicator8 Baseline9


FY 2016 /2015-16 FY

2017FY

2018FY

2019FY

2020H1 H2Ongoing SewerageProject 958.68

Sewerage andSeptageManagement

146.59

1. Coverage oflatrines(individual orcommunity)

84% 73% 89% 97% 100% 100% 100%

2. Coverage ofseweragenetwork services

15% 15% 15% 50% 100% 100% 100%

3. Efficiency ofCollection ofSewerage

0% 0% 0% 50% 100% 100% 100%

4. Efficiency intreatment 0% 0% 10% 70% 100% 100% 100%

Urban Transport

Mission Management Information System

SECTOR WISE SLIP TEMPLATE: URBAN TRANSPORT

Under AMRUT Mission, Urban Transport components which are admissible are; Side- walks, Foot-over bridges, Non-motorized transport (NMT), Buses, BRTS, Multi-level parking, Waterways Ferryvessels Ferries and Waterways. (AMRUT Guidelines; para3).

1.Service Level Gaps Assessment

1.SERVICELEVELSTATUS

Assess the existing transportation situation and service levels gaps for indicators urban to achieveservice level benchmarks. (AMRUT Guidelines Table.1.4 & Table 2.5). Service Level gaps will beanalyzed as per indicators prescribed in Service LevelBenchmarks (SLBs) for urban transport ofMoUD, GoI. Please provide information in200 words responding to the following questions;

Q1) Question: What isthe baseline information available for improvement city transportation?WhetherCity has prepared City Mobility Plan? If yes then, Does CMP includes NMT, Ferries, water ways?Answer: An Integrated City Mobility Plan has been prepared considering the cluster of 3 citiesBhubaneswar, Cuttack and Puri. A City Development Plan (CDP) has been prepared and DetailedProject Report (DPR) for City bus services has been prepared which elucidates the futurerequirement of the city bus fleet and all other infrastructure required. The present rolling stockstructure for the City has been identified through the DPR. The CMP includes the study relates toidentification and proposals of NMT. There is no particular study required with respect toWaterways or ferries.

There are four Levels of Services (LOS) which will be calculated considering various indicators asLOS1, LOS2, LOS3 and LOS4 correspond to adequacy and quality of city’s availabletransportationservices. The summary of the service level gap and performance should be presented as perillustrative Table

Table: Service level Benchmark

Sl. No Indicators Levels of Service as per SLB, MoUDPresentServiceLevel

1

ServiceCoverage ofurbantransport inthe city

Level ofService Range

1 >=12 0.7-13 0.3-0.74 <0.3

4

2

Availability ofurbantransport per1000population


1 >=0.62 0.4-0.63 0.2-0.44 <=0.2

4

TOTAL BUSES =TOTAL ROUTE KMS =TOTAL POPN =TOTAL AREA =

Q2) Question: Have level of services (LOS) been calculated based on the indicators prescribed in theSLB for urban transport by Ministry of Urban Development? As per MoUD SLB for urban transport,there are four Levels of Services (LOS) which will be calculated considering various indicators asLOS1, LOS2, LOS3 and LOS4 correspond to adequacy and quality of city’s available transportationservices.

Answer:Yes

Q3) Question: While assessing the above indicators, also analyze following aspects as an outcome ofthe broad components of urban transport under AMRUT;

a) Non-Motorised Transport Facilities

1. % of network covered

2. Encroachment on NMT roads by vehicle parking (%)

3. NMT parking facilities at interchanges (%)

Answer:

No NMT available.

b) Parking: Availability of parking spaces

Answer:

Sr.No. Location

1 On stretch ofRing Road after Sati Chaura Square2 On stretch of Local road near Mohammadia and Alisha Bazar3 On Stretch ofRoad near A3IT

4 On local road connecting Ring road and Deulsahi road nearOrissa High court

5 On stretch oflocal road nearFlowerMarketRoad6 On Link Road near Badambadi Bus stand7 On stretch ofRing road below ROB to NH5 connecting

8 On stretch ofroad adjacent to Municipalfield from NM5 service road9 On Cuttuck-Paradip Road near OMP petrol pump10 On stretch ofLocal road parallel to Canal road near Trinath Temple11 On Mahtab Road12 On stretch of Haripur Road between Ravenshaw college and

Seminary College13 On stretch of Haripur road from Subhash 8ose Gate to ICICI Bank ATM14 On stretch of local road between Odiya Bazar15 On stretch of Local road near Sutahat16 On Stadium Road near Chandi Mandir17 On stretch of local road near New Stewart School18 On stretch of local road from Tlnikonia Bagichia road parallel to

Badi Masjid road19 On stretch of local road off 3ajrakbati road near Shree HariBhavan20 On stretch of road near PG Botany Dept of Ravenshaw Universi- ty

21 On stretch of local road near lajpat Rai DAV Public school22 On stretch of Road near Cuttack Railway Station entrance NH

side23 On stretch of NH 5 service near Mahanadi Vihar road24 On Railway Station Inner service road25 On Railway station Inner service road - North side26 On stretch of Peripheri Road near Hara Mani Mandap27 On stretch of Jobra Road near Bombay Inn28 On stretch of periphery road near Jobra colony (in front of Durga

Hotel)29 On stretch of road East of Orissa Cricket Academy30 On Stadium road in front of Barabati Stadium

Q4) Question: Have specific issues for the city been identified and addressed including issues with theexisting traffic, NMT, parking / transport environment?

Answer:

• Lack of structured land use and transportation integration• Absence of mass transit system and heavy reliance on personal transport• Insufficient traffic management measures leading to congestion• Encroachment of roadside activities on roads and sidewalks• Illegal parking• Disorderly traffic coupled with mixing of fast and slow moving mode• Poor road condition

Sidewalks, Foot-over bridges and NMT

Q5) Question: Do you think city roads are safe for pedestrians? If no then, which section of roads needsimmediate attention?

Answer: No. Most of the roads are very compact and have very less ROW leading to jams andcongestion and pollution. No proper integration of landuses and there are insufficient provisions forpedestrians and cyclists.

Q6) Question: What type of Non-Motortised Vehicle (NMV) infrastructure available in the city?

1. Lanes reserved for NMV

2. Footpath allocated for both pedestrian and NMV

3. Area allocated to NMV parking

Answer:No footpaths available.

Q7) Question: Has budget provision for NMT included in the transportation projects in the city?

Answer: No

Buses and BRTS

Q8) Question: Have city initiated feasibility of BRTS?

Answer: No

Q9) Question: What kind of public transport is available in the city? Please mentionNumber of publictransport vehicles operating in the city.

Answer: City Bus Services. 24 buses are available

Q10) Question: What is the total length of public transport corridor in the city limits?

Answer: 30 kms (approx.)

Multi-level parking

Q11) Question: Whether city has designated parking spaces? If yes, provide list of

Answer:No Multi level parking available.

Proposed: Near High Court, Barabati Statium, Railway Station

Q12) Question: What is the total available on street paid parking spaces on Arterial, sub arterial roads?

Answer:

Availability of paid parking spaces

Total available on street paid parking spaces = (a) = 12

Total available on street Parking Spaces = (b) = 30

Availability of paid parking spaces = (a/b) *100 = 12/30*100 = 40%

Q13) Question: Whether parking supply inventory is available for the city including; Types of on-road andoff road parking restrictions (time of day, duration, private etc)

Answer: NO

Q14) Question: Whether parking facilities available for bicycles, auto rickshaw, goods delivery.

Answer: Yes. Near Railway Station.

Q15) Question: Is private sector involved in parking?

Answer: Yes

Q16) Question: Whether adopted parking bans/restrictions on major roads .

Answer: Yes

Waterways and Ferry vessels

If city has waterways system then provide following questions;

Q17) Question: Whether city has inland waterways system?

Answer: No

Q18) Question: Who is managing and operating the ferry system? if any

Answer: No

Q19) Question: Provide number of ferry vessels

Answer: No

Institutional Set Up

Describe the institutional framework including role and responsibilities in terms; administration andPolicy making, planning, Vehicle Registration, public transportation operators including Privateoperators and overall traffic management.

Role and Responsibilities of all the agencies shall be provided in the illustrative tableNo. 2

Table: Role and responsibility of agencies involved in management of City transport

Sl.NO Agencies Responsibilities

1 CDA, CMC Planning2 CUTSL, BPTSL City Bus Services3 RTO Vehicle Registration4 Traffic police under SP (Police) Traffic Management

5 Collector (Cuttack) , Commissioner (H&UD) & District Magistrate, Vice Chairman (CDA),Municipal commissioner (CMC)

Administrative andPolicy Making

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions;

Q20) Question: Who is responsible for management of urban transport in the city?

Answer: As per date, there is an SPV named CUTSL but the buses are plied by BPTSL as some ofthe bus fleet has been diverted towards Cuttack

Q21) Question: Is there enough provisions for enforcement of traffic rules for pedestrian safety on roads?

Answer: No

Q22) Question: How are you planning for execution of transport related projects for AMRUT, whether,present role and responsibilities lying with these organizations is capable to implement projectsunder AMRUT?

Answer: Yes

1.2 Status of On-going Projects

Critically examine the existing and ongoing projects for improvement of urban transport as to befilled in illustrative Table No.3

Notice: Undefined index: table12_proposed_projects in

/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransport-result.php on line 312

Project/Sector Approved Cost(Rs. Lakhs)

Status ofprojects

(till May 13)

Expenditure(Rs. Lakhs) Scheme

Q23) Question: Whether convergence with other ongoing Central and State and LocalGovernmentPrograms/Schemes can be done at this stage.

Answer: Yes

Q24) Question: Whether ongoing scheme and projects has been critically reviewed? Please explain whatis the extent of convergence to bridge the gaps?

Answer: Yes

2.Bridging the Gap

Demand Gap Assessment

Despite the fact, non-motorized modes and public transit account for a significant proportion oftravel activity of a city. The city needs to pursue different strategies and programs for bridging thegap on transportation facilities where the city is and where it wishes to go in future.

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions

Q25) Question: What steps can be taken to bridge these gaps? Please explain in 200 words,

Answer:Cuttack needs to enhance itself to become an international level body with consideringthe transport aspect a bit higher. The city needs to develop several strategies to overcome hugegap of transport facility to citizens.

Construction of Outer and Inner Ring Roads Mass Rapid Transit Systems such as Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) & Metro Rail (MRTS) Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Multi Level and Off Street Parking facilities High level Street facilities with integrated NMT and pedestrian walkways Traffic and vehicular Safety with Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Transport System Management Systems And various other innovations could be identified to make the city Transport oriented city with best

mobility solutions for the city.

Whether present level gaps as identified through SLB indicators will be achievable by 2021 ascompare with the present level of gap and demand?. (Table)

Table: Bridging the gap- Demand Assessment

Sl. No Benchmark Levels of Service as per SLB, MoUD PresentService Level Current Gap

Demand/Target by

2011

1 Service Coverage of urbantransport in the city

LoS Range

1 >=12 0.7-13 0.3-0.74 <0.3

4

2Availability of urbantransport per 1000population

LoS Range1 >=0.62 0.4-0.63 0..2-0.44 <=0.2

4

Other indicators

3Percentage of CityCovered by footpathswider than 1.2m

LoS Range1 >=752 50-753 25-504 <25

4

4 Non Motorised TransportFacilities including;

a) % of network covered

LoS Range1 >=502 50-253 25-154 <15

4

b)Encroachment on NMTroads by vehicle parking(%)

LoS Range

1 <=102 0-203 20-304 >30

4

c) NMT parking facilities atinterchanges (%)

LoS Range

1 >=752 50-753 25-504 <25

4

5Availability of On-streetpaid public parking spaces(%)


1 >=752 50-753 25-504 <25

3

6 Water ways and Ferries

LoS Range

1 >=12 0.7-13 0.3-0.74 <0.3

4

3.Objectives

The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to address thesegaps. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines: para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9).

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions;

Q26) Question: How will you define your overall goal to improve city transport?

Answer: The vision statement of urban transport for Cuttack is to:

‘To regulate, inclusively plan and develop an efficient, effective and well integrated transport systempromoting economic competitiveness and vitality through efficient, high-quality transport services forpassengers and freight through

• Enhancing mobility in an environmentally, socially sensitive manner• Inducing modal shift in favour of public transport• Providing pedestrian transport infrastructure.• Providing seamless connectivity

Q27) Question: What possible strategies envisaged to achieve various LoS to improve the transportationcomponents under AMRUT?

Answer:

• Conversion of Kucha roads to Pucca Roads• Augmentation of City Buses Services• Construction of Parking Spaces for private vehicles• Non Motorised Transport provision and pedestrian facility for enhanced mobility• Integrating of Intelligent Transport Systems with transport structure• Automated Signalisation at all junctions

Q28) Question: How well does goals and objective for developing efficient urban transportation facilitiescan articulate the use of NMT options and parking facilities to improve the quality oflife of localcitizens?

Answer:

Segregated pedestrian and NMV corridor, Bus lanes and bus stops, Adequate crossing facilities forPedestrians/NMVs, Signalized improved intersection for addressing to the requirements of allmodes of traffic including pedestrian / NMT’s, Auto rickshaw stand & cycle rickshaw stands on MultiUtility Zone, Planting for Storm Water Management, Auto-rickshaw Stands, Cycle-rickshaw Stands,Hawker Zones, Paid Car Parking, Street Furniture, Bus Stops, Traffic Police Booths, MTNL boxes,Fire hydrants, Junction boxes, Street lights/ pedestrian lights, etc

Q29) Question: How identified each objective can evolve considering bridging the gap with present levelof services as to achieve SLB indicators.

Answer: Mainly, Parking spaces mentioned earlier need to be developed to decongest roads ofunofficial parking of the vehicles. Augmentation of city buses giving way to public transport andpedestrians.

Q30) Question: How objectives can be framed ensuring sustainable mobility solutions and creating city-wide NMT facilities for pedestrians and cyclists.

Answer:

1. By widening the road and implementing cycle tracks and pedestrian walkways .2. By acquisition of more city buses for better accessibility.

Q31) Question: Howe objectives for improvement of NMT facilities integrate with other modes oftransport.

Answer: The objectives need to be framed in such a manner so to provide safe and secureway to promote walkability and mobility to citizens. Improving main road structure andenforcing the most congested and crowded zones of the city such as markets, mandis, oldcity areas, railway station etc to convert them to NMT zones.

4.Alternate Activities to Meet Objectives

Evolve overall objective is to ensure that mobility solutions for the city that are sustainableand create city-wide NMT facilities for pedestrians and cyclists and integrate them with othermodes of transport. Suggest possible strategies and options to achieve each objective withestimate cost of alternate solutions as per table 1 & Table 2

Table1:PossibleStrategiestomeetobjectives

Sl.No Objectives Possible

ActivitiesFinancing

Source

1 Construction of Street Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01)

off street parking,paid parking

2 Construction of Footpaths(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02)

Pedestrianwalkways, footpaths

3 Augmentation of City Bus fleet(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03)

Increase of fleetand routes

4 Construction of Cycle Tracks(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04)

5 Construction of Multi Level Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05) Multi level parking

6 Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06)

7 Construction of Bus Q Shelters(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07)

8 Construction of Foot Over Bridges(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08)

Table2:EstimatedCostforvariouspossibleactivities

Sl. No Projects Unit Quantity Total Cost(in Crores)

1 Construction of Street Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01) No 4 5.00

2 Construction of Footpaths(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02) Kms 3 2.00

3 Augmentation of City Bus fleet(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03)

Buses 100 12.00

4 Construction of Cycle Tracks(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04) Kms 5 3.00

5 Construction of Multi Level Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05) No 3 8.00

6 Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06) No 1 5.00

7 Construction of Bus Q Shelters(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07) No 20 5.00

8 Construction of Foot Over Bridges(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08) No 5 3.00

43.00

While addressing alternate solution to achieve these objects, please provide information in500 words responding to the following questions:

Q32) Question: How realistic and feasible urban transport strategies are to be evolved to addresskey challenges, priorities as an outcome of the citizen consultation

Answer: With respect to the citizen and stakeholder consultation, there are several actionsthat need to be addressed to improve the city wide transportation scenario. Mostlyimproving/widening/upgradation of roads, improved network of CBS, installation of NMTfacilities at congested areas, development of truck terminal, parking areas and rickshawareas etc

Q33) Question: What alternative innovative solution can be adopted for improving the servicedelivery by creating

a: Citizen friendly provision of barrier free pedestrian facilities including, footpaths, roadmarking and signages

Answer: Vehicle tracking System, automatic pedestrian crossing facility,

b: pathways

Answer:Urban planning with built-in street design,

c: Parking

Answer:Multilevel parking spaces, Zoning near the congested areas to promote NMT

d: traffic management using ITS

Answer: Vehicle tracking System, Surveillance System, GIS based traffic analysis

Q34) Question: What strategic intervention is required in the implementation of above projects

Answer: Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), Traffic Management Committees or agencies etcappointed to overlook and undertake the specific tasks related to the transport criteria suchas widening the roads, Creating path way, Proper traffic arrangement

Q35) Question: Whether alternative modes of transport such as cycling can be provided in majorroads

Answer: Yes

Q36) Question: Whether non-Motorised Transport (NMT) facilities corridor suggested withdedicated NMV, Cycle track and Signalized Intersection count.

Answer: Yes

Q37) Question: How innovative solutions for alternative modes of transport including NMT such ascycling, pedestrian and public transportation system will address the overall transportationissue of the city?

Answer: this would shape the future city transportation in such a way to improve mobility ofthe city with barrier free pedestrian movement and enhanced levels of safety and security

Q38) Question: What will be the source of funding for identified project?

Answer: Govt. grants under AMRUT, State and PPP

Q39) Question: Whether convergence with other scheme has been made. Please explain eachidentified projects and their source of funding such as AMRUT, 14th FC and also convergewith other schemes.

Answer: Yes

5.Citizen Engagement

Each alternative will be discussed with citizens and activities to be taken up will be prioritizedto meet the service level gaps. The section will summarize the Citizens priorities for adoptionof alternate solution of urban mobility, drawing on SLIPpreparation.

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:

Q40) Question: Have all stakeholders including residents (RWAs), Transporters, RTOs,TrafficPolice attended the citizen consultation?

Answer:Yes

Q41) Question: Has alternate proposed crowd sourced?

Answer:Yes

Q42) Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?

Answer:the most important criteria for citizens is enhancing the public transport which cancater to almost all the areas of the city. Secondly, to designate various parking spaces so todecongest the main roads.

Q43) Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis ofconsultations?

Answer: Yes

Q44) Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?

Answer: Studying the entire area and identifying the loopholes in the service provision.

Q45) Question: How citizen has been exposed best practices and smart solutions in order togenerate citizen-driven solutions for urban mobility?

Answer: Workshops

Q46) Question: Please examine whether identified solutions are addressing citizens requirement

Answer:Yes

Q47) Question: Whether ULB have adequate resources to implement prioritized alternatesolutions?

Answer: Yes

Q48) Question: How innovative alternate options of NMT facilities examined and shared withcitizens?

Answer: Workshops

6.Prioritization of projects

Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling upbased on the available resources to meet the respective objective. (AMRUT Guidelines; para6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please provide information in 200 words responding to the followingquestions:

Q49) Question: Are innovative solution prioritized based on the available resources and demandof citizens?

Answer:Yes

Q50) Question: Has source of funding considered while prioritizing the project?

Answer: Yes

Q51) Question: Whether project has been prioritized considering last mile connectivity?

Answer: Yes

Table1:Possible Strategies to meet objectives

PriorityNo Project Cost

(inCr.)Financing

Source

1Construction of Street Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01) 5.00 AMRUT/STATE

2Construction of Footpaths(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02) 2.00 AMRUT/STATE

3Augmentation of City Bus fleet(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03) 12.00 AMRUT/STATE

4Construction of Cycle Tracks(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04) 3.00 AMRUT/STATE

5Construction of Multi Level Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05) 8.00 AMRUT/STATE

6Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06) 5.00 AMRUT/STATE

7Construction of Bus Q Shelters(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07) 5.00 AMRUT/STATE

8Construction of Foot Over Bridges(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08) 3.00 AMRUT/STATE

43.00

7.Out of Box Solution UsedPlease provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:

Q52) Question: What are the out of box thinking on alternative and new innovative solutions forthe following;

a: Citizen friendly provision of barrier free pedestrian facilities including, footpaths, roadmarking and signages,

Answer:Escalators and underpasses for pedestrian movement, solar lighting and panels forsignages and road marking.

b: pathways

Answer: Escalators and travelators, automated Subway Systems for pedestrian movement

c: parking

Answer:Automated Valet System, Mobile integrated citizen info systems, parking line alarms,

d: traffic management using ITS

Answer: Real Time Vehicle tacking using Satellite imagery

Q53) Question: Whether solution provided to improve the safety of vulnerable groups such as oldage/handicapped/children

Answer: Yes

8.Conditionalities Fulfilled and Resilience Built-in

First and foremost condition is to identify the availability of land for projects such as parking,widening of roads for pedestrian, cycle tracks and hawkers zone. Further, agencies need tobe brought on board for any new initiatives as part of convergenceprocess and necessaryapproval and permissions.

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:

Q54) Question: Whether described the conditionalities of each project in terms ofavailability ofland parking,widening of roads for pedestrian, cycle tracks and hawkers zone?

Answer: Yes.

Q55) Question: How these projects will be funded? Are projects being implemented through ownsources or borrowing then which is the commitment in this regard.

Answer: Govt, State and PPP mode

Q56) Question: Has environmental obligation such as clearances and NOC required? Pleasesuggest action and initiatives need to be taken in this regards

Answer: Yes

9.Financial Plan

Prepare Financial Plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development. The financialplan will include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State, ULBs and)including financial convergence with various ongoing projects. Describe briefly theinstitutional arrangement), leveraging potential partnerships,convergence with otherGovernment Schemes, monitoring and evaluation and also provide year-wise milestones andoutcomes.

Q57) Question: How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creatinginfrastructure projects? Explain in 200 words how these institutional arrangements areleveraging partnership and converge with government scheme and provide list of individualprojects which is being financed by various stakeholders.

Answer: Yes. Funding in the sector under various schemes by various stakeholders areconsidered.

Question: Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergenceand consultation with funding partners?

Answer: Yes. Financial plan to consider the convergence under identified projects.

Q58) Question: What are the different sources of funding being tapped for this project.(75 words)

Answer: Through Central, State, ULB and community Participation and fundinf from otherdevelopment agencies through pooling of resources

Q59) Question: Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project hasbeen categorized based on financial considerations (100 words)

Answer: Yes. Financial structure is to be prepared on a sustainable business modelconsidering the project priority and fund availability.

Q60) Question: Have the financial assumptions been listed out? Please provide the list. (100words)

Answer: No

Q61) Question: Have the financial assumptions been listed out? Please provide the list. (100words)

Answer: No

10. Finalization of Master Service LevelImprovement Plan

Q62) Question: Discuss Draft Master Service Level Improvement Plan with citizen. Based on the finalcitizen consultations, prepare final Master Service Level Improvement Plan. Annual Plan will beprepared as an application for monitoring the improvement in achieving the service level indicatorsas targeted in the Service level improvement plan. (AMRUT Guideline; Table 2.1, 2.2, 2.3., 2.4 and2.5) and Annual Plan (AMRUT Guidelines; Annexure-2, 3, 4, 5& 6)

Answer:

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5. These tables arebased on Amrut guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

MASTER SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS DURING MISSION PERIOD

(As per Table 2.2 of AMRUT guidelines) (Amount in Rs. Cr)

Notice: Undefined index: table6_sno in

/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransportresult.phpOn line 869

SN Project Name PhysicalComponents

Change in Service LevelsEstimated Cost

Indicator Existing Proposed

1 Construction of Street Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01) 5.00

2 Construction of Footpaths(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02) 2.00

3 Augmentation of City Bus fleet(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03) 12.00

4 Construction of Cycle Tracks(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04) 3.00

5 Construction of Multi Level Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05) 8.00

6 Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06) 5.00

7 Construction of Bus Q Shelters(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07) 5.00

8 Construction of Foot Over Bridges(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08) 3.00

9 43.00

ANNUALFUNDSHARINGPATTERNFORSEWERAGE PROJECTS

(As per Table 2.3.1 of AMRUT guidelines) (Amount in Rs. Cr)Notice: Undefined index: table7_sno in

/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransportresult.phpOn line 917

Sl.No Name of Project Total Project

CostShare

GoI State ULB Others Total

1 Construction of Street Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01) 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00

2 Construction of Footpaths(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02) 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00

3 Augmentation of City Bus fleet(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03) 12.00 6.00 6.00 12.00

4 Construction of Cycle Tracks(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04) 3.00 1.50 1.50 3.00

5 Construction of Multi Level Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05) 8.00 4.00 4.00 8.00

6 Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06) 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00

7 Construction of Bus Q Shelters(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07) 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00

8 Construction of Foot Over Bridges(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08) 3.00 1.50 1.50 3.00

9 43.00 21.50 21.50 43.00

ANNUAL FUND SHARING BREAK-UP FOR SEWERAGE PROJECTS

(As per Table 2.3.2 of AMRUT guidelines)Notice: Undefined index: table8_sno in /var/www/html/amrut/urbantransportresult.phpOn line 973

Sl. No Project GoIState ULB

Convergence Others Total14th FC Others Total 14th FC Others Total

1 Construction of Street Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01) 2.50 2.50 5.00

2 Construction of Footpaths(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02) 1.00 1.00 2.00

3 Augmentation of City Bus fleet(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03) 6.00 6.00 12.00

4 Construction of Cycle Tracks(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04) 1.50 1.50 3.00

5 Construction of Multi Level Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05) 4.00 4.00 8.00

6 Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06) 2.50 2.50 5.00

7 Construction of Bus Q Shelters(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07) 2.50 2.50 5.00

8 Construction of Foot Over Bridges(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08) 1.50 1.50 3.00

9 21.50 21.50 43.00

YEAR WISE PLAN FOR SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS

(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)Notice: Undefined index: table9_proposed_projects in /var/www/html/amrut/urbantransport-result.php on line 1033

Sl. No Proposed Projects Project Cost Indicator Baseline


FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020H1 H2

1 Construction of Street Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01) 5.00

2 Construction of Footpaths(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02) 2.00

3 Augmentation of City Bus fleet(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03) 12.00

4 Construction of Cycle Tracks(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04) 3.00

5 Construction of Multi Level Parking(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05) 8.00

6 Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06) 5.00

7 Construction of Bus Q Shelters(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07) 5.00

8 Construction of Foot Over Bridges(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08) 3.00

9 43.0010111213141516

Urban Transport

Mission Management Information System -PARKS

CUTTACK

PARKS AND PLAY GROUNDS

The objective of this template is to assist ULBs in preparation of SLIP for Green Space and Parks component forrejuvenation of at least one park in each of the 500 Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) involving creation and upgradation ofbasic elements, especially for the youth, children and the elderly. Rejuvenation also includes involving local citizensand groups in the maintenance and upkeep of the park in order to make the development sustainable. Cost of thiscomponent will be met from the 2.5 per cent annual allocation for development of parks under the Mission and usedin accordance with its Guidelines. (Refer AMRUT Guidelines: Section 5.1 Sr.No.6, 6.7 & Annexure-1 Sr.No.4) SLIPwould involve write up on following sections:

1. Assess the Service Level Gap

First and foremost aspect of SLIP is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for organised GreenSpace and Parks based on standards prescribed in URDPFI Guidelines (Refer AMRUT Guidelines; Para 3.1.6 &6.2). This shall also include describing existing institutional framework vis-à-vis development and maintenance oforganised green space/ parks. In order to assess the service level gap the City shall have to review all policies,plans; scheme documents etc., hold discussions with concerned officials and citizens, as per the requirement andconduct physical assessment of city parks to understand the current status (Refer Indicative Parks Assessment Toolas given in Annex-1 of this document). The city should undertake overall assessment of Parks and Open/ GreenSpace in terms of a) Physical Activities Resources, b) Family Facilities including child friendly play equipment’s, c)Available General Services and Facilities, and, d) Aesthetics and otherWhile discussing about the existing status of the organised green space in your city make a sincere effort to analyzethe proportion of area under the categorization of parks as per URDPFI Guidelines eg: Housing Area Park (HAP),Neighbourhood Park (NP) Community Park (CP), District Park (DP), and Sub-City Park (SCP). Also focus onqualitative aspects of existing parks like geographical distribution across the city, encroachments, child and elderlyfriendly features; staffing, maintenance & equipment issues; and maintenance by RWAs/ Corporates under theirCSR Activities etc.

Please respond to the questions given below (Word Limit: 800 words).

Question: What are the available data sources/ plans/ reports/ schemes that exist as regards developmentand maintenance of parks?Cuttack municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks such as name of the park, area, O&Mcosts and brief description about the parks apart from this there is a CDP report mentioning about this sector in theLanduse Pattern. But the existing parks are developed with the help of state government and maintenance of theparks is covered in the municipal expenditure

Question: Review the recommendation on open/ green space as per Master Plan/ Development Plan andmap existing green cover against the same. Identify the areas where there is deficiency of open/green spaceThere is a CDP which provide the landuse 0.98% and stating that green spaces have tobedeveloped in the city butthere is no document where the deficiency of open/green spaces identified to fill the gap andthere is a map showing the existing green space locations for the city.

Question: Does the ULB follow URDPFI Guidelines to categorize its organized greens/ parks/ open space orfollow its own categorization? If ULB follow its own categorization, what is the rationale and how well theyare interlinked to development of parks?Cuttack municipality does not categorize the parks and open spaces as per the hierarchy of organized green spacesbased on population and area criteria as prescribed by URDPFI guidelines it only categorizes parks in developedand undeveloped category .

Question: What is the per person open space availability in the city in general and within built-up areas?466.1478 acres is the cumulative area of developed parks in the Cuttack town and open spaces andplaygrounds spread over the city for children’s to play and elders to take a fresh walk in the morning but theseplay grounds and not equipped with any amenities.

Service Level Status

Sr. No Indicators PresentStatus Benchmark Source Reliability

Factors

1 Per person open space in plainareas as per URDPFI guidelines 3.09Sq.m 10 -12 Sq. m CDP C

Source:URDPFI–2014 & Analysis of ULB Level Data

Question: Have the ULB/ City prepared park wise inventory of facilities and amenities? (ULB should identifysome of the quick-win parks, which could be developed with minimal intervention that can attract goodnumber of citizens)Cuttack municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks such as name of the park, area, O&Mcosts and brief description about the parks apart from this they identified few parks for renovation which can attract alot of people to use the parks and enhancing children friendly features identified by the municipality will make temquick-win parks.

Question: How is the physical condition of parks in the city? Do they have boundary wall, fenced area,facilities of public conveniences, tube well, dustbins etc. (Mention in proportions, if possible)Park in Cuttack municipality are in good physical condition overall , Most of the Housing area parks in Cuttack needrenovations for lack of toilet facility and park furniture is not in a good shape .

Question: Whether parks have well planned play area encouraging physical activity? Are they equippedwith child friendly play equipment, snack/ ice cream parlors/ kiosks etc. (Mention in proportions, ifpossible?)Parks maintained under CDAhas child friendly equipment and the housing area parks under BMC lack ChildFriendly Equipment, Snack/ ice cream parlors/ kiosks need to be established.

Question: How well aesthetics component have been built in parks of your city? Are they wellilluminated, landscaped – manicured with waterbodies/ fountains etc. wherever possible? (Mentionproportions, if possible)Parks in Cuttack municipality are in decentaesthetic condition overall, nevertheless Housing area parkshasshortageoflandscape and park furniture is not in a good shape and Child friendly Equipment.

Question: Are there some running schemes/ projects – Central/ State/ Donor funded in the city asregard development of parks/ open spaces? Or else ULB is funding park development of parks/ greenspace out of its own budget?Development of open spaces, green spaces and parks in Cuttack are done with the help of state government andmaintenance of the parks is covered by the municipal fund.Question: Explain the process how a park/ open space is normally shortlisted for development? Doesthe city have rationale for park selection for development or it is done on ad-hoc basis.Cuttack municipality shortlists the parks/open spaces in a unique process as follows

1. Identification of government lands in the city2. Gap analysis based on the existing parks coverage3. Initial prioritization based on the size and coverage of the park4. Stakeholder consultation by the municipal engineers5. Citizen consultation and enlightening them with the facts6. Finally considering all the above aspects the chairperson and counsellors shortlists parks for

development

Question: List the organizations/ authorities/ private sector firms etc. and describe their roles andresponsibilities in development of city parks/ open space along with green area under their jurisdiction.NO Private sector firms /organizationsis involved in the development or maintenance of a park in the city. All theparks are under the municipal authority and Development authorityare operated and maintained.

Question: Where can new parks be developed in the future; how much space may be available.Cuttackmunicipalityhas identified few government lands in the municipal jurisdiction where there is a need forparks but the land is under the state body which has to be transferred to the municipality so that they can planand execute the projects.Question: How much is allocated under Parks/ Open/ Recreational space as per the DP or Master Planfor new areas?DP which provide the landuse 0.98% and stating that green spaces have to be developed in the city but there isno allocated under Parks/ Open/ Recreational space as per the DP or Master Plan for new areas.

Question: Who manages the parks in the city? How much delegation of responsibility has been given toRWAs and/or NGOs?Parks are undertaken by the municipality, development authority and a Private Organisation, no NGO’sdelegation of responsibility has been given.Question: Which parks have uneasy accessibility issues or get flooded/water logged etc.?All the existing parks are easy to access and there is no such problem of flooding/water logging etc transpired inthe parks.

Question: Does the ULB have any guidelines for providing safe and secure access to parks for childrenand elders?Private architects are hired for designing the parks and then the plans are reviewed by the internal technicalexperts with regard to safety, security and universal accessibility measures taken in the design and then finalizethe plan for execution which makes parks in Cuttack safe and secure for all age groups.Question: Is there a system for preventing the entry of animals into parks?Existing parks in the CUTTACK municipality are with the boundary wall so there is not even a single eventoccurred in the past few years that the animals entering the parks.

Question: Does the city have any guidelines for horticulture; types of trees and plants, etc?City has not specifically followed any guidelines for horticulture or selecting type of trees or plants .the plangiven by the landscape architect is followed and implemented on field because of shortage if capacity in thatsector.

Table2:Jurisdiction wise–Allocation of Green space and ParksSr.No Jurisdiction No. of Parks Area of Parks (in hec) Proportion (%)

1 ULB 36 15.6 71.3

2 Development Authority 4 6.3 28.7

3Private Ownership Corporate/NGO's

0Total 40 100 100

Table3: Hierarchy of Organized Greens in the City (As per URDPFI - 2014)Sr. No Category No. of Parks Area under the

category (in hec)% Area under parks

and open spaces

1 Housing Area Park (HAP) (Less than 5000 Sq.m.) 30 5.2 25.8

2 Neighbourhood Park (NP)(5000 -10000 sq.m.) 3 0.1 0.5

3 Community Park (CP) (10000 - 50000 sq.m 7 11.5 57.8

4 District Park (DP)(50000 – 250000 Sq.m.) 1 3.2 15.8

5 Sub-City Park (SCP) (2,50,000 sq.m. & above ) 40 20 100

2. Bridge the Gap

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, list out initiatives undertaken in differentongoing programs/ projects/ master – development plans to address these gaps. While bridging the gapsconvergence with other ongoing Central, State and Local Government Programs/ Schemes will also be lookedinto. Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.3, Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of the identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of physical assessment ofparks using “Assessment Tools for Parks” (Refer Annex-1 of this document) and meeting the opportunity tobridge the gap.

As per para 5.1 (Sr.No.6) of AMRUT guidelines all projects involving development of green spaces & parksshall have to make special provision for child friendly components and establish a system of maintenance withlocal residents participation. At least one park from each of the 500 ULBs under AMRUT would be taken up fordeveloping facilities for Children, Youth and Elderly.

Assessment of the current status of City parks/ open spaces would clearly bring out the gap/ dearth of openspaces in terms of area allocation, having inadequate citizen friendly features and issues pertaining to itsmaintenance. And these will lead to formulation of three broad objectives.

Please respond to the following questions in not more than 500 words

Question: Have the city took physical assessment of city parks? (ULB’s may refer Annex-1 indicativeprocurement of this document)

Question: Estimate the demand gap of open/green space in the city.The demand gap of the city is about 2698.8 hectares as per URDPFI Guidelines

Question: Explain how the city plans to fill the gap in green cover and progressively enhance greencover within City to 15% over next 5 years. ?Cuttack municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks and decided to construct a park everyyear and renovate the existing facilities so that they can fill the gap in green cover and within next decade greencover in the city will be close to 15 %.

Question: Assess and describe, if requisite provisions as per Master Plan and otherState legislation have already been made?Yes

Question: Explain the city’s action plans to make special provisions for installing child friendlycomponents in the city parks as per AMRUT Guidelines. ?All the parks under CDAhas Child Friendly Equipment and ParksUnderCuttack municipality lacks withchildfriendly components.

Question: Provide details of the initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects toaddress the gaps in enhancing the green cover and rejuvenation/ development of parks. Provideinformation in Table 4.There are no ongoing projects in this sector as the city is concerned

Tabel4: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned/ Committed Projects

Sr. No. Name of theProject Scheme Name Cost in Rs. Lakhs Month of

CompletionStatus (as on dd mm

2015)

OBJECTIVES

Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps. While developing objectives followingquestion shall be responded so as to arrive at appropriate objective.

Question: Please provide a set of 2-3 objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100 words.1. Installation of child friendly equipment2. Image of wild life to be conserved3. Urban greenery in prioritization through plantation on both sides of all pivot routes4. Identification of huge vacant lands in the city to build parks

3. Examine Alternatives and Estimate Cost

Suggest alternatives/ options to complete the ongoing projects pertaining to developing parks andgreen spaces. Identify quick-win parks and open space which can also have play area and associatedfacilities for Children, Youth & Elderly. Also identify & describe the prevailing models of parksdevelopment & maintenance in your city? Any new model your city wishes to adopt? (Word Limit: 200Words)City is trying to incorporate the industries surrounded by to take reasonability and develop parks as part ofcorporate social responsibility to compensate the pollution created by tm in the city .these are in the stages ofdiscussion but under implementation

Table 4: Cost Estimates for Park Development

Sr. No. Component Rate Amount in Rs.

1 Boundary wall 3225 32959502 Jogging track 1100 155492723 Gate 200000 6000004 fountain 250000 30000005 Toilet 200000 60000006 Gazebo 100000 10000007 Stone Pillars and Sculpture 30000 8700008 Garden Bench/Sitting 10000 17600009 Lawn 150 60134510 Shade loving foliage Plants 300 3660011 Foliage and Flowering shrubs 500 6450012 Gate Light 20000 150000013 Boundary Light 40000 212000014 Focus Light 15000 21000015 sliders 250000 1150000016 See-saw 250000 1175000017 Swing 200000 8200000

Grand Total 68057667

As per AMRUT guidelines half of Rs. Cr. may be sought from Government of India under the scheme andbalance could be explored and converged from other sources like 14th Finance Commission, State Government(Park Development Fund) and CSR Activities of Corporate Groups active in the City.

4. Citizen Engagement

ULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback on the suggestedalternatives and innovations. Each alternative pertaining to development and maintenance models for parks willbe discussed with citizens and activities to be taken up will be prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULBwill prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on the available resources. (Refer AMRUT Guidelines;Para 6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please explain following questions detailing out the needs, aspirations and wishes of thelocal people. (Word Limit: 250 Words)

Question: Has all relevant stakeholders groups been involved in the consultation?Private architects are hired for designing the parks and then the plans are reviewed by the internal technicalexperts and then the discussions are carried out to the all relevant stakeholders groups

Question: Explore option for O&M Contracts including PPPP with (RWAs/ Citizens Groups/ CorporateGroups – CSR, Selling advertisement rights etc.).City is trying to incorporate the industries surrounded by to take reasonability and develop parks as part ofcorporate social responsibility to compensate the pollution created by tm in the city .these are in the stages ofdiscussion but under implementation

Question: Explain how the city plans to establish a system of maintenance with active citizen’sengagement as per AMRUT Guidelines.

Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the cityWard level consultations are done after the stakeholder consultation and they are used for prioritization of theprojects

Question: Has alternatives explored are crowd sourced?No

Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?3 times consultation programs were held under the chairmanship of collector Cuttack for development ofCuttack town all the feedbacks and suggestions are considered in planning the parks

Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of consultations?No it is not done based on consultation initially, all the technical aspects are considered by engineers & thechair person

Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?Cuttack municipality prioritizes the parks/open spaces in an exclusive process as follows

1. Gap analysis based on the existing parks coverage2. Initial prioritization based on the size and coverage of the park3. Citizen consultation and enlightening them with the facts and ask their priorities4. Finally considering all the above aspects the chairperson and counsellors prioritizes parks for

development

5. Prioritize ProjectsBased on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on the availableresources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please reply following questions (WordLimit: 100 Words)

Question: What are the sources of funds?

The funds are divided into three parts1. Construction of parks 50% from AMRUT(GOI)2. Construction of parks 50% from STATE GOVERNMENT3. O&M cost by ULB 100%

Question: Has projects been converged with other program and schemeNo

Question: Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?YES the projects undertaken are prioritized based on “more with less” approach in such a way that we spendless money and coverage is more

6. Conditionalities

1.1 Describe the Conditionality’s of each project in terms of availability of land, environmental & socialobligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment, approval and permission needed toimplement the project. Required approvals will be sought from competent authority and organizations.(Word Limit: 100 words)

Cuttack municipality has identified few government lands in the municipal jurisdiction where there is a need forparks but the land is under the state body which has to be transferred to the municipality so that they can planand execute the projects if provided funds on time by the state & central government, and approval of DPR bythe apex committee

7. Resilience

The resilience factor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable, safe and secured parkdevelopment schemes. Ensure use of rust free sturdy steel structures for child and elderly friendly features.(Word Limit: 100 words)Plans are reviewed by the internal technical experts with regard to safety, security and universal accessibilitymeasures taken in the design and then finalize the plan for execution which makes parks in Cuttack safe andsecure for all age groups. And the materials used considering there sustainability in mind

8. Financial PlanOnce the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in terms of capital cost andO&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.5) Based on the investment requirements, differentsources of finance have to be identified. Financial Plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized developmentwill be prepared. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 4, 6.6, 6.12, 6.13 & 6.14). The financial plan will include percentageshare of different stakeholders (Centre, State and City) including financial convergence with various ongoingprojects. While preparing finance plan please reply following questions (Word Limit: 100 words)

How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creatinginfrastructure projects?The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.

List of individual project which is being financed by various stakeholders?All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and 50%state grant. The list may be seen in Table ___.

Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence andconsultation with funding partners?Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered underother scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been planned forprojects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded under AMRUT on50: 50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required. However, consultationfor involving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the objective of the mission.



Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?Yes, the financial plan takes care of both CAPEX and OPEX costs to ensure sustenancethroughout the life cycle of all projects identified in SLIP.

Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State,ULBs and)?Yes, the financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.

Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?Yes, it includes financial and physical convergence with various ongoing projects underdifferent schemes supported by both Central & State grant.

Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?Yes, it has been provided

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10 and 2.11. These tables are based onAMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

MASTER SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS DURING MISSION PERIOD

(Asper Table 2.2 of AMRUT guidelines) (Amount in Rs. Cr)(Amount in Rs. Cr)

Sr.No. Project Name Physical

ComponentsEstimatedCost (Cr)Indicator Existing

(As-Is)After

(To-be)

1Construction of Park in Cuttack near Mouzainam Park -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/01 0.44

2Development of Chandan Pokhari Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/02 0.84

3Development of Chahata Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/03 0.62

4Development of Akhaya mohanty Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/04 0.33

5Development of Biswanath Pandit Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/05 0.42

6Development of Buruia Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/06 0.40

7Development of Mahatab Nagar Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/07 0.31

8Development of Netaji Birth Place Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/08 0.31

9Development of Madhukunia Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/09 0.59

10Development of Sahed Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/10 0.22

11Development of Gandhi Smriti Udayan in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/11 0.21

12Development of Rajbagicha Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/12 0.21

13Development of Dasarapur Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/13 0.11

14Development of Sarangdhar Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/14 0.11

15Development of Saptadara Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/15 0.11

16Development of Gurudwar Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/16 0.11

17Development of Parala Maharaja Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/17 0.11

18Development of Linikonia Bagicha Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/18 0.11

19Development of Sheltu Chhalu Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/19 0.11

20Development of Biren Mitra Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/20 0.10

21 Anand Bhavan Park in Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/21 0.19

22Development of Saheed Bhavan Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/22 0.11

23Development of Madhusudan Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/23 0.11

24Development of B.R Ambedkar Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/24 0.11

25Development of Potapokhari Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/25 0.11

26Development of KauikaChhaka Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/26 0.11

27Development of BaDevelopmentige Colony Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/27 0.11

28Development of Gadabadia Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/28 0.11

29Development of Behera Colony Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/29 0.11

ANNUAL FUND SHARING PATTERN FOR PARKS AND GREEN SPACE PROJECTS(As per Table 2.3.1 of AMRUT guidelines)(Amount in Rs. Cr)

Sr.No.

Name of the ProjectTotal Project

Cost (Cr) GOI State ULB OthersTotal

(in Cr)

1Construction of Park in CuttacknearMouzainam Park -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/01

0.44 0.22 0.22 0.44

2 Development of Chandan Pokhari Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/02 0.84 0.42 0.42 0.84

3 Development of Chahata Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/03 0.62 0.31 0.31 0.62

4 Development of Akhayamohanty Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/04 0.33 0.16 0.16 0.33

5 Development of BiswanathPandit Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/05 0.42 0.21 0.21 0.42

6 Development of Buruia Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/06 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.40

7 Development of Mahatab Nagar Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/07 0.31 0.16 0.16 0.31

8 Development of Netaji Birth Place Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/08 0.31 0.16 0.16 0.31

9 Development of Madhukunia Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/09 0.59 0.29 0.29 0.59

10 Development of Sahed Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/10 0.22 0.11 0.11 0.22

11 Development of Gandhi Smriti Udayan inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/11 0.21 0.11 0.11 0.21

12 Development of Rajbagicha Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/12 0.21 0.11 0.11 0.21

13 Development of Dasarapur Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/13 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

14 Development of Sarangdhar Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/14 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

15 Development of Saptadara Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/15 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

16 Development of Gurudwar Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/16 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

17 Development of Parala Maharaja Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/17 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

18 Development of Linikonia Bagicha Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/18 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

19 Development of Sheltu Chhalu Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/19 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

20 Development of Biren Mitra Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/20 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10

21 Anand Bhavan Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/21 0.19 0.10 0.10 0.19

22 Development of Saheed Bhavan Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/22 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

23 Development of Madhusudan Park in Cuttack- AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/23 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

24 Development of B.R Ambedkar Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/24 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

25 Development of Potapokhari Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/25 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

26 Development of KauikaChhaka Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/26 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

27 Development of BaDevelopmentige ColonyPark in Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/27 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

28 Development of Gadabadia Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/28 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

29 Development of Behra Colony Park in Cuttack- AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/29 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11

ANNUAL FUND SHARING BREAK_UP FOR PARKS and PLAY GROUND PROJECTS

(As per Table 2.3.2 of AMRUT guidelines)

Sr.No Project GOI

State ULBConvergence Others Total14th

Fc Others Total 14thFc Others Total

1Construction of Park in Cuttacknear Mouzainam Park -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/01

0.22 0.22 0.44

2Development of Chandan PokhariPark in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/02

0.42 0.42 0.84

3Development of Chahata Park inCuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/03

0.31 0.31 0.62

4Development of Akhaya mohantyPark in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/04

0.16 0.16 0.33

5Development of Biswanath PanditPark in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/05

0.21 0.21 0.42

6Development of Buruia Park inCuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/06

0.20 0.20 0.40

7Development of Mahatab NagarPark in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/07

0.16 0.16 0.31

8Development of Netaji Birth PlacePark in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/08

0.16 0.16 0.31

9Development of Madhukunia Park inCuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/09

0.29 0.29 0.59

10Development of Sahed Park inCuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/10

0.11 0.11 0.22

11Development of Gandhi SmritiUdayan in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/11

0.11 0.11 0.21

12Development of Rajbagicha Park inCuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/12

0.11 0.11 0.21

13Development of Dasarapur Park inCuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/13

0.05 0.05 0.11

14Development of Sarangdhar Park inCuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/14

0.05 0.05 0.11

15Development of Saptadara Park inCuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/15

0.05 0.05 0.11

16Development of Gurudwar Park inCuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/16

0.05 0.05 0.11

17Development of Parala MaharajaPark in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/17

0.05 0.05 0.11

18Development of Linikonia BagichaPark in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/18

0.05 0.05 0.11

19Development of Sheltu Chhalu Parkin Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/19

0.05 0.05 0.11

20Development of Biren Mitra Park inCuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/20

0.05 0.05 0.10

21 Anand Bhavan Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/21 0.10 0.10 0.19

22Development of Saheed BhavanPark in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/22

0.05 0.05 0.11

23Development of Madhusudan Parkin Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/23

0.05 0.05 0.11

24Development of B.R AmbedkarPark in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/24

0.05 0.05 0.11

25Development of Potapokhari Parkin Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/25

0.05 0.05 0.11

26Development of Kauika ChhakaPark in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/26

0.05 0.05 0.11

27Development of BaDevelopmentigeColony Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/27

0.05 0.05 0.11

28Development of Gadabadia Park inCuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/28

0.05 0.05 0.11

29Development of Behera ColonyPark in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/29

0.05 0.05 0.11

YEAR WISE PLAN FOR SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)

Proposed Project ProjectCost Indicator Baseline

Annual targets (Increments form the baseline value)FY 2016 FY

2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020H1 H2

Construction of Park in Cuttack nearMouzainam Park -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/01

0.44

Development of Chandan Pokhari Parkin Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/02 0.84

Development of Chahata Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/03 0.62

Development of Akhayamohanty Parkin Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/04 0.33

Development of Biswanath Pandit Parkin Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/05 0.42

Development of Buruia Park in Cuttack- AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/06 0.40

Development of Mahatab Nagar Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/07 0.31

Development of Netaji Birth Place Parkin Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/08 0.31

Development of Madhukunia Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/09 0.59

Development of Sahed Park in Cuttack- AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/10 0.22

Development of Gandhi Smriti Udayanin Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/11 0.21

Development of Rajbagicha Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/12 0.21

Development of Dasarapur Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/13 0.11

Development of Sarangdhar Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/14 0.11

Development of Saptadara Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/15 0.11

Development of Gurudwar Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/16 0.11

Development of Parala Maharaja Parkin Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/17 0.11

Development of Linikonia Bagicha Parkin Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/18 0.11

Development of SheltuChhalu Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/19 0.11

Development of Biren Mitra Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/20 0.10

Anand Bhavan Park in Cuttack -AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/21 0.19

Development of Saheed Bhavan Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/22 0.11

Development of Madhusudan Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/23 0.11

Development of B.R Ambedkar Park inCuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/24 0.11

Annex-1: Indicative Assessment Tools for Parks (Indicative – ULBs can have its own assessment tool as perthe requirement or customize this tool to suit its need)

CUTTACK - HUDD-Government of OdishaCuttack As per the 2011 census, the population of Cuttack...

Documents

Transcript of CUTTACK - HUDD-Government of OdishaCuttack As per the 2011 census, the population of Cuttack...