Current trends in library resource management, discovery, and resource sharing
description
Transcript of Current trends in library resource management, discovery, and resource sharing
Current trends in library resource management, discovery, and resource sharing
Marshall BreedingIndependent Consultant,Founder and Publisher, Library Technology Guideshttp://www.librarytechnology.org/http://twitter.com/mbreeding
12 March 2015Open Session for Carnegie Mellon University Libraries
Library Technology Guides
www.librarytechnolog
y.org
Appropriate Automation Infrastructure
Current automation products out of step with current realities
Majority of library collection funds spent on electronic content
Majority of automation efforts support print activities
New discovery solutions help with access to e-content
Management of e-content continues with inadequate supporting infrastructure
Key Context: Technologies in transition
Client / Server > Web-based computing Social and Collaborative Networks
Integration of social computing into core infrastructure
Local computing shifting to cloud platforms Application Service Provider offerings standard New expectations for multi-tenant software-as-a-
service Full spectrum of devices
full-scale / net book / tablet / mobile Mobile the current focus, but is only one example of
device and interface cycles
Strategic shift for Academic Libraries
Collection Shift from Print > Electronic + Digital E-journal transition largely complete Circulation of print collections slowing Large-scale investment in e-books
Technical infrastructure support: Need better tools for access to complex multi-
format collections Strong emphasis on digitizing local collections Demands for enterprise integration and
interoperability
New Metadata management WorlkFlows
Moving away from individual record-by-record creation Life cycle of metadata
Metadata follows the supply chain, improved and enhanced along the way as needed
Manage metadata in bulk when possible E-book collections
Highly shared metadata E-journal knowledge bases, e.g.
Great interest in moving toward semantic web and open linked data Path emerging for linked data in resource management and
discovery systems AACR2 > RDA MARC > BIBFRAME (http://bibframe.org/)
Appropriate Automation Infrastructure
Current automation products out of step with current realities
Majority of library collection funds spent on electronic content
Majority of automation efforts support print activities
New discovery solutions help with access to e-content
Management of e-content continues with inadequate supporting infrastructure
Technology Shift Client / Server > Web-based computing Beyond Web 2.0
Integration of social and academic identities and networks into core infrastructure
Local computing shifting to cloud platforms Application Service Provider offerings standard New expectations for multi-tenant software-as-a-
service Full spectrum of devices
full-scale / net book / tablet / mobile Mobile the current focus, but is only one example of
device and interface cycles
Software as a Service Multi-Tenant SaaS is the modern
approach One copy of the code base serves multiple
sites Software functionality delivered entirely
through Web interfaces No workstation clients
Upgrades and fixes deployed universally Usually in small increments
Data as a service SaaS provides opportunity for highly shared
data models Bibliographic knowledgebase: one globally
shared copy that serves all libraries Discovery indexes: article and object-level index
for resource discovery E-resource knowledge bases: shared
authoritative repository of e-journal holdings General opportunity to move away from library-
by-library metadata management to globally shared workflows
Traditional model of Automation Oriented to Print collections Single Library System
Includes branches or divisional facilities Automation strategies often set when
capabilities of automation systems were limited
Institutional solo of collection management
Fragmented Library Management ILS for management of (mostly) print Duplicative financial transactions between ILS Acquisitions and
enterprise business systems (many shadow systems) Proxy and Authentication services E-book lending platform (multiple?) Interlibrary loan (borrowing and lending) Self-service and AMH infrastructure Electronic Resource Management PC Scheduling and print management Event scheduling Digital Collections Management platforms (CONTENTdm, DigiTool, etc.) Discovery-layer services for broader access to library collections No effective integration services / interoperability among disconnected
systems, non-aligned metadata schemes
Reconceptualization of Automation Current organization of functionality based on
past assumptions Possible new organizing principles
Fulfillment = Circulation + ILL + DCB + e-commerce
Resource management = Cataloging + Acquisitions + Serials + ERM
Customer Relationship Management = Reference + Circulation + ILL (public services)
Enterprise Resource Planning = Acquisitions + Collection Development
Academic Libraries need a new model of library management
Not an Integrated Library System or Library Management System
The ILS was designed to help libraries manage print collections
Generally did not evolve to manage electronic collections
Other library automation products evolved: Electronic Resource Management Systems –
OpenURL Link Resolvers – Digital Library Management Systems -- Institutional Repositories
Integrated (for print) Library System
Circulation
BIB
Staff Interfaces:
Holding / Items
CircTransact User Vendor Policies$$$
Funds
Cataloging Acquisitions Serials OnlineCatalog
Public Interfaces:
Interfaces
BusinessLogic
DataStores
LMS / ERM: Fragmented Model
Circulation
BIB
Staff Interfaces:
Holding / Items
CircTransactUserVendor Policies$$$
Funds
CatalogingAcquisitionsSerials OnlineCatalog
Public Interfaces:
Application Programming Interfaces`
LicenseManagement
LicenseTerms
E-resourceProcurement
VendorsE-JournalTitles
Protocols: CORE
Informal management of Electronic Resources
Circulation
BIB
Staff Interfaces:
Holding / Items
CircTransactUserVendor Policies$$$
Funds
CatalogingAcquisitionsSerials OnlineCatalog
Public Interfaces:
Application Programming Interfaces
Budget License Terms
Titles / Holdings
Vendors
Access Details
Comprehensive Resource Management No longer sensible to use different software
platforms for managing different types of library materials
ILS + ERM + OpenURL Resolver + Digital Asset management, etc. very inefficient model
Flexible platform capable of managing multiple type of library materials, multiple metadata formats, with appropriate workflows
Support for management of metadata in bulk Continuous lifecycle chain initiated before
publication
Gaps in Automation Almost no systematic automation
support for references and research services Customer Relationship Management?
Resource sharing / Interlibrary loan management
Collection development support
Library Services Platform Library-specific software. Designed to help libraries
automate their internal operations, manage collections, fulfillment requests, and deliver services
Services Service oriented architecture Exposes Web services and other API’s Facilitates the services libraries offer to their users
Platform General infrastructure for library automation Consistent with the concept of Platform as a Service Library programmers address the APIs of the platform to
extend functionality, create connections with other systems, dynamically interact with data
Library Services Platform Characteristics
Highly Shared data models Knowledgebase architecture Some may take hybrid approach to accommodate local
data stores Delivered through software as a service
Multi-tenant Unified workflows across formats and media Flexible metadata management
MARC – Dublin Core – VRA – MODS – ONIX Bibframe New structures not yet invented
Open APIs for extensibility and interoperability
Consolidated index
Search Engine
Unified Presentation LayerSearch:
Digital Coll
ProQuest
EBSCO…
JSTOR
Other Resour
ces
New Library Management Model
`API Layer
Library Services Platform
LearningManageme
nt
Enterprise ResourcePlanning
StockManageme
nt
Self-Check /
Automated Return
Authentication
Service
Smart Cad /
Payment systems
Discovery
Service
Library Services Platform Options
Category WorldShare Management Services
Alma Intota Sierra Services Platform
Kuali OLE
Responsible Organization
OCLC Ex Libris ProQuest Innovative Interfaces, Inc
Kuali Foundation
Key precepts Global network-level approach to management and discovery.
Consolidate workflows, unified management: print, electronic, digital; Hybrid data model
Knowledgebase driven. Pure multi-tenant SaaS
Service-oriented architectureTechnology uplift for Millennium ILS. More open source components, consolidated modules and workflows
Manage library resources in a format agnostic approach. Integration into the broader academic enterprise infrastructure
Software model
Proprietary Proprietary
Proprietary Proprietary Open Source
Open Systems Achieving openness has risen as the key
driver behind library technology strategies Libraries need to do more with their data Ability to improve customer experience and
operational efficiencies Demand for Interoperability Open source – full access to internal
program of the application Open API’s – expose programmatic
interfaces to data and functionality
Leveraging the Cloud Moving legacy systems to hosted
services provides some savings to individual institutions but does not result in dramatic transformation
Globally shared data and metadata models have the potential to achieve new levels of operational efficiencies and more powerful discovery and automation scenarios that improve the position of libraries overall.
Traditional Proprietary Commercial ILS Aleph, Voyager, Millennium, Symphony, Polaris, BOOK-IT, DDELibra, Libra.se LIBERO, Amlib, Spydus, TOTALS II, Talis Alto, OpenGalaxy
Traditional Open Source ILS Evergreen, Koha
New generation Library Services Platforms Ex Libris Alma Kuali OLE (Enterprise, not cloud) (in development) OCLC WorldShare Management Services, ProQuest Intota (in development) Innovative Interfaces Sierra (evolving)
Competing Models of Library Automation
Changing models of Resource Sharing
BibliographicDatabase
Library System
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
Holdings
Main Facility
Search:
Integrated Library System
Patrons useCirculation featuresto request itemsfrom other branches
Floating Collectionsmay reduce workload forInter-branchtransfers
Model:Multi-branchIndependentLibrary System
Library Consortia Groups of libraries want to work together
to share an automation system Number of participants limited by the
perceived capacities of the automation system
Consortial Borrowing Systems Each library system operates its own
automation environment Relies on manual and automated
processes to allow patrons to discovery and request materials among participants INN-Reach (Innovative Interfaces) ShareIT (Auto-Graphics) Relais ILL URSA (SirsiDynix, now defunct)
BibliographicDatabase
Library System A
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
BibliographicDatabase
Library System B
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
BibliographicDatabase
Library System C
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
BibliographicDatabase
Library System D
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
BibliographicDatabase
Library System F
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
BibliographicDatabase
Library System E
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
Resource Sharing Application
BibliographicDatabase
Discovery and Request Management Routines
Staff Fulfillment Tools
Inter-System Communications
NCIP SIP ISO
ILLZ39.50
NCIP
NCIP
NCIP
NCIP
NCIP
NCIP
Search:
Consortial Resource Sharing System
Shared Infrastructure Common discovery
Retention of local automation systems Technical complex with moderate
operational benefits Common discovery + Resource
Management Systems Shared Resource management with local
discovery options
BibliographicDatabase
Shared Consortia System
Library 2
Library 3
Library 4
Library 5
Library 7
Library 8
Library 9
Library 10
Holdings
Library 1 Library 6
Shared Consortial ILS
Search:
Model:Multipleindependentlibraries in aConsortiumShare an ILS
ILS configuredTo supportDirect consortialBorrowing throughCirculation Module
Progressive consolidation of library services
Centralization of technical infrastructure of multiple libraries within a campus
Resource sharing support Direct borrowing among partner institutions
Shared infrastructure between institutions Examples: 2CUL (Columbia University /
Cornell University) Orbis Cascade Alliance (37 independent
colleges and universities to merge into shared LSP)
2CUL
Shared Services:Collection DevelopmentTechnical Services
Shared Infrastructure?:
Orbis Cascade Alliance 37 Academic Libraries Combined enrollment of 258,000 9 million titles 1997: implemented dual INN-Reach systems Orbis and Cascade consortia merged in 2003 Moved from INN-Reach to OCLC Navigator /
VDX in 2008 Current strategy to move to shared LMS
based on Ex Libris Alma
The Evolution of Library Resource Discovery
Challenge: More integrated approach to information and service delivery Library Web sites offer a menu of unconnected silos:
Books: Library OPAC (ILS online catalog module) Search the Web site Articles: Aggregated content products, e-journal collections OpenURL linking services E-journal finding aids (Often managed by link resolver) Subject guides (e.g. Springshare LibGuides) Local digital collections
ETDs, photos, rich media collections Metasearch engines Discovery Services – often just another choice among many
All searched separately
Online Catalog
Books, Journals, and Media at the Title Level
Not in scope: Articles Book Chapters Digital objects Web site content Etc.
Scope of SearchSearch:
Search Results
ILS Data
Next-gen Catalogs or Discovery Interface (2002-2009) Single search box Query tools
Did you mean Type-ahead
Relevance ranked results (for some content sources)
Faceted navigation Enhanced visual displays
Cover art Summaries, reviews,
Recommendation services
Next-gen Catalogs or Discovery Interface
Single search box Query tools
Did you mean Type-ahead
Relevance ranked results Faceted navigation Enhanced visual displays
Cover art Summaries, reviews,
Recommendation services
Books, Journals, and Media at the Title Level
Other local and open access content
Not in scope: Articles Book Chapters Digital objects
Scope of Search
Discovery Interface search modelSearch: Digital
Collections
ProQuest
EBSCOhost
…MLA
Bibliography
ABC-CLIO
Search Results
Real-time query and responses
ILS Data
Local Index
Metasearch Engine
Discovery from Local to Web-scale Initial products focused on technology
AquaBrowser, Endeca, Primo, Encore, VuFind, LIBERO Uno, Civica Sorcer, Axiell Arena Mostly locally-installed software
Current phase is focused on pre-populated indexes that aim to deliver Web-scale discovery Primo Central (Ex Libris) Summon (Serials Solutions) WorldCat Local (OCLC) EBSCO Discovery Service (EBSCO) Encore Synergy (no index, though)
Web-scale Index-based DiscoverySearch:
Digital Collections
Web Site Content
Institutional
Repositories
…E-Journals
Reference Sources
Search Results
Pre-built harvesting and indexing
Consolidated Index
ILS Data
Aggregated Content packages
(2009- present)
Usage-generate
dData
Customer
Profile
Open Access
Profile of Library Subscriptions
Bento Box Discovery ModelSearch:
Digital Collections
Web Site Content
Institutional
Repositories
E-JournalsSearch Results
Pre-built harvesting and indexing
Consolidated IndexILS Data
Aggregated Content packages
Open AccessVuFind /
Blacklight
Web-scale Search ProblemSearch:
Search Results
Pre-built harvesting and indexing
Consolidated Index
???
Non Participating
Content Sources
Problem in how to deal with resources not provided to ingest into consolidated index
Digital Collections
Web Site ContentInstitution
al Repositori
es
…E-Journals
ILS Data
Aggregated Content packages
Challenge for Relevancy Technically feasible to index hundreds of
millions or billions of records through Lucene or SOLR
Difficult to order records in ways that make sense
Many fairly equivalent candidates returned for any given query
Must rely on use-based and social factors to improve relevancy rankings
Evaluating Index-based Discovery Services Intense competition: how well the index covers the
body of scholarly content stands as a key differentiator
Difficult to evaluate based on numbers of items indexed alone.
Important to ascertain now your library’s content packages are represented by the discovery service.
Important to know what items are indexed by citation and which are full text
Important to know whether the discovery service favors the content of any given publisher
Open Discovery Initiative NISO Work Group to Develop Standards
and Recommended Practices for Library Discovery Services Based on Indexed Search
Informal meeting called at ALA Annual 2011
Co-Chaired by Marshall Breeding and Jenny Walker
Term: Dec 2011 – March 2014
Balance of ConstituentsLibraries
Publishers
Service Providers
50
Marshall Breeding, Vanderbilt UniversityJamene Brooks-Kieffer, Kansas State University Laura Morse, Harvard UniversityKen Varnum, University of Michigan
Sara Brownmiller, University of OregonLucy Harrison, College Center for Library Automation (D2D liaison/observer)Michele Newberry
Lettie Conrad, SAGE PublicationsBeth LaPensee, ITHAKA/JSTOR/PorticoJeff Lang, Thomson Reuters
Linda Beebe, American Psychological Assoc
Aaron Wood, Alexander Street Press
Jenny Walker, Ex Libris GroupJohn Law, Serials SolutionsMichael Gorrell, EBSCO Information Services
David Lindahl, University of Rochester (XC)Jeff Penka, OCLC (D2D liaison/observer)
Convergence Discovery and Management solutions will
increasingly be implemented as matched sets Ex Libris: Primo / Alma Serials Solutions: Summon / Intota OCLC: WorldCat Local / WorldShare Platform Except: Kuali OLE, EBSCO Discovery Service
Both depend on an ecosystem of interrelated knowledge bases
API’s exposed to mix and match, but efficiencies and synergies are lost
Web-scale Search ProblemSearch:
Search Results
Pre-built harvesting and indexing
Consolidated Index
???
Non Participating
Content Sources
Problem in how to deal with resources not provided to ingest into consolidated index
Digital Collections
Web Site ContentInstitution
al Repositori
es
…E-Journals
ILS Data
Aggregated Content packages
Citations / Metadata > Full Text Citations or structured metadata provide
key data to power search & retrieval and faceted navigation
Indexing Full-text of content amplifies access
Important to understand depth indexing Currency, dates covered, full-text or citation Many other factors
A&I Content in Discovery Services
Will discovery services eventually become powerful enough to displace need for abstracting and indexing services?
Specialized vocabulary and other metadata make positive contributions to the discovery process
Specialized and scoped search methodologies
Researchers value this tools
Challenge for Relevancy Technically feasible to index hundreds of
millions or billions of records through Lucene or SOLR
Difficult to order records in ways that make sense
Many fairly equivalent candidates returned for any given query
Must rely on use-based and social factors to improve relevancy rankings
Objectivity: Does relevancy reflect bias or publisher preferences
Socially-powered discovery Leverage use data to increase
effectiveness of discovery Usage data can identify important or
popular materials to inform relevancy engines
Identify related materials that may not otherwise be uncovered through keyword matching
Be careful to avoid introducing bias loops
Challenges for Collection Coverage To work effectively, discovery services
need to cover comprehensively the body of content represented in library collections
What about publishers that do not participate?
Is content indexed at the citation or full-text level?
What are the restrictions for non-authenticated users?
How can libraries understand the differences in coverage among competing services?
Evaluating the Coverage of Index-based Discovery Services Intense competition: how well the index covers the
body of scholarly content stands as a key differentiator
Difficult to evaluate based on numbers of items indexed alone.
Important to ascertain now your library’s content packages are represented by the discovery service.
Important to know what items are indexed by citation and which are full text
Important to know whether the discovery service favors the content of any given publisher
Open Discovery Initiative NISO Work Group to Develop Standards
and Recommended Practices for Library Discovery Services Based on Indexed Search
Informal meeting called at ALA Annual 2011
Co-Chaired by Marshall Breeding and Jenny Walker
Term: Dec 2011 – March 2014http://www.niso.org/workro
oms/odi/
Balance of ConstituentsLibraries
Publishers
Service Providers
60
Marshall Breeding, Vanderbilt UniversityJamene Brooks-Kieffer, Kansas State University Laura Morse, Harvard UniversityKen Varnum, University of Michigan
Sara Brownmiller, University of OregonLucy Harrison, College Center for Library Automation (D2D liaison/observer)Michele Newberry
Lettie Conrad, SAGE PublicationsRoger Schonfeld, ITHAKA/JSTOR/PorticoJeff Lang, Thomson Reuters
Linda Beebe, American Psychological AssocAaron Wood, Alexander Street Press
Jenny Walker, Ex Libris GroupJohn Law, Serials SolutionsMichael Gorrell, EBSCO Information Services
David Lindahl, University of Rochester (XC)Jeff Penka, OCLC (D2D liaison/observer)
Convergence Discovery and Management solutions will
increasingly be implemented as matched sets Ex Libris: Primo / Alma Serials Solutions: Summon / Intota OCLC: WorldCat Local / WorldShare Platform Except: Kuali OLE, EBSCO Discovery Service
Both depend on an ecosystem of interrelated knowledge bases
API’s exposed to mix and match, but efficiencies and synergies are lost
Why integrate resource management and discovery? Obviates the need to constantly synchronize local
inventory metadata representations into derivative discovery environment
Transactional efficiency for real-time status and user-initiated requests and services
Strategic Knowledge base: resource management, linking, scoping of discovery
Conceptual and technical cohesion Possible cost savings relative to purchasing
separately Simplified support and business relationships
Counter trendMany libraries continue
separate discovery strategies
Open source discovery + licensed Web-scale index
EBSCO Discovery Service: strategy to integrate with any back-end ILS or LSP
Why not integrate management and discovery?
Less dependence on single supplier Best of breed in each product category Increased customizability and local
integration
TrendDemise of the local catalog
Many library services platforms do not include the concept of an online catalog dedicated to local physical inventory
Designed for discovery services as public-facing interface
Implication: Discovery service must incorporate detailed functionality for local materials and related services
Reassess expectations of Technology
Many previous assumptions no longer apply
Technology platforms scale infinitely No technical limits on how libraries share
technical infrastructure Cloud technologies enable new ways of
sharing metadata Build flexible systems not hardwired to
any given set of workflows
Reassess workflow and organizational options
ILS model shaped library organizations New Library Services Platforms may
enable new ways to organize how resource management and service delivery are performed
New technologies more able to support strategic priorities and initiatives
Time to engage Transition to new technology models just
underway More transformative development than
in previous phases of library automation Opportunities to partner and collaborate
Vendors want to create systems with long-term value
Question previously held assumptions regarding the shape of technology infrastructure and services
Provide leadership in defining expectations
Questions and discussion