GIFTED EDUCATION 101 Gifted Education: Sharing, Discovering, Programming.
Current Issues in Gifted Education THE ILLUSION CONTINUES – ODE DROPS CUT SCORES STATE OF GIFTED...
-
Upload
lillian-cox -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Current Issues in Gifted Education THE ILLUSION CONTINUES – ODE DROPS CUT SCORES STATE OF GIFTED...
Current Issues in Gifted Education
THE ILLUSION CONTINUES – ODE DROPS CUT SCORES
STATE OF GIFTED EDUCATION IN OHIO
GIFTED OPERATING STANDARDS REBOOT
Illusion of Excellence
Ohio Achievement Assessments
Grading on a Curve: The Illusion of Excellence
Areas in grade levels needed only 34% -58% correct to be proficient!
And now,
The Ohio State Board of Education recently voted to lower state assessment (PARCC) proficiency cut scores to lower than recommended for college and career readiness
PARCC cut scores
READING 3rd* 4th
5th 6th
Proficient 63% 31%26% 31%
Accelerated 73% 47%41% 47%
Advanced 84% 72%73% 72%
* = OAA score
MATH 3rd 4th
5th 6th
Proficient 29% 32%26% 27%
Accelerated 40% 45%41% 45%
Advanced 68% 77%71% 77%
Impact on Gifted Education
Decreases the effectiveness of the gifted performance indicator on school and district report cards
Gifted performance Index is based on low cut scores
Value-added (growth) measurement is questionable
For More Information
Next year, ODE will be free to set cut scores that have no meaning beyond Ohio, which means Ohio is right back where we started before we moved to the new state assessments.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/us/test-scores-under-common-core-show-that-proficient-varies-by-state.html?smid=tw-nytnational&smtyp=cur&_r=1
http://www.oagc.com/files/OAGC_Grading_On_A_Curve_Final.pdf
State of Gifted Education in Ohio
Identification Service
2008
/200
9
2009
/201
0
2010
/201
1
2011
/201
2
2012
/201
3
2013
/201
4235,000240,000245,000250,000255,000260,000265,000270,000275,000280,000285,000
Levels of Gifted Identification since 2008
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2012
2014
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%
38%40%39%38%41%
37%
28%28%
22%19%18%
23%
Level of Gifted Services Provided in Ohio Over Two Decades
Percentage
State of Gifted Education in Ohio
Staffing Funding
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
Levels of Gifted Staffing since 2008
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
$0.00
$10,000,000.00
$20,000,000.00
$30,000,000.00
$40,000,000.00
$50,000,000.00
$60,000,000.00
$70,000,000.00
$80,000,000.00
Money
Gifted Operating Standards
“The Rule”
BRIEF HISTORY
December 2012
April 2013
May-July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
September 2015
From 15 pages to 2 1/2
Current Status:
DraftSeptember
2015
Removes all quality definitions and criteria for service.
Removes caseload restrictions and direct contact time requirements for service.
Removes all definitions of qualified gifted staff, including intervention specialists and gifted coordinators.
Current Status:
September 2015 draft
Removes all funding accountability requirements.
Removes all compliance language, including audits and the process to remediate non-compliant districts required under Ohio Revised Code 3324. 01-07
Advocacy Needed!
OAGC.com click on “advocacy” tab for latest updates
Stakeholders can provide input at the link to the Ohio Department of Education website until 5 p.m. on Friday, November 6.
Email or call State Board Members by November 16
Please consider testifying!
December 14 and 15
http://www.oagc.com/advocacyUpdates.asp
2015 Gifted Operating Standards "Reboot"
ODE Gifted Survey Input Guidelines (PLEASE READ BEFORE COMPLETING SURVEY)
ODE Gifted Rule Input Survey -- Deadline November 6, 2015
Draft OAGC Response to the Proposed Gifted Rule Changes
OAGC Testimony to State Board Regarding 9.11.15 Gifted Stds draft.9.15.15
Audio of Sept. Achievement Committee Discussion of Gifted Stds. (at 1 Hr. 23 min.)
9.11.15 Draft of the Gifted Operating Standards
Current 2008 Gifted Rule(PDF)
2013 Gifted Operating Standards Timeline and Issues
Another Look at Funding
Funding Levels Accountability Levels
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
$0.00
$10,000,000.00
$20,000,000.00
$30,000,000.00
$40,000,000.00
$50,000,000.00
$60,000,000.00
$70,000,000.00
$80,000,000.00
Money
BOE District 3 Data for School Districts Reporting No Gifted Students Served
Data source: Ohio Department of Education SFPR Reports and 2014 Report Cards
District Identification
Funds
Coordinator
Funds
GIS
Funds
Total
Allocation
Students Identified Students Served Gifted Progress Overall
Progress
Bethel Local
4,698.12
18,685.00
30,643.40
54,026.52
18.4%`
0
D
F
Bradford Ex. Village
2,744.83
18,685.00
17,937.60
39,367.43
7.5%
0
NR*
F
Covington Ex. Village
4,018.44
18,685.00
26,532.70
49,236.14
14.0%
0
C
C
Eaton Community City
11,343.76
24,664.20
74,366.30
110,374.26
9.3%
0
C
A
Jefferson Township
3,003.94
18,685.00
15,321.70
37,010.64
6.2%
0
NR
C
Miami East Local
5,962.54
18,685.00
39,612.20
64,259.74
33%
0
B
A
Mississiniwa Valley
3,466.47
18,685.00
22,795.70
44,947.17
7.5%
0
NR
A
New Miami Local
3,240.48
18,685.00
20,927.20
42,852.68
1.5%
0
NR
F
Newton Local
2,577.82
18,685.00
17,190.20
38,453.02
14.5%
0
D
C
Preble Shawnee Local
7,180.49
18,685.00
47,086.20
72,951.69
4.6%
0
C
F
Twin Valley Community
4,242.81
18,685.00
27,280.10
50,207.91
6.4%
0
C
C
TOTAL
52,479.70
211,514.20
339,693.30
603,687.20
0
551,207.50
* NR = Not Reported, too few students
If no students are served in these districts, how are allocated gifted education dollars for coordinators and gifted intervention specialists being spent?