CURRENT INDEX TO LEGAL PERIODICALS INDEX TO LEGAL PERIODICALS ... Golden Gate University...

CURRENT INDEX TO LEGAL PERIODICALS

Marian Gould Gallagher Law Library University of Washington

Nikki Pike, Information Specialist

Sue Sorensen, Editor

Copyright 2009, Marian Gould Gallagher Law Library

Key to Citations---July 3, 2009 Albany Law Review 71 Alb. L. Rev., No. 4, Pp. 1041-1315, 2008. Arizona State Law Journal 41 Ariz. St. L.J., No. 2, Summer, 2009. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L., No. 2, Fall, 2008. Boston College Law Review 50 B.C. L. Rev., No. 2, March, 2009. Boston University Law Review 89 B.U. L. Rev., No. 2, April, 2009. Cardozo Law Review 30 Cardozo L. Rev., No. 4, March, 2009. Columbia Business Law Review 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev., No. 1, Pp. 1-356. Columbia Law Review 109 Colum. L. Rev., No. 5, June, 2009. DePaul Journal for Social Justice 2 DePaul J. for Soc. Just., No. 1, Fall, 2008. Duquesne Law Review 47 Duq. L. Rev., No. 1, Winter, 2009. Elder Law Journal 17 Elder L.J., No. 1, Pp. 1-199, 2009. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J., No. 1, Pp. 1-251, 2009. Environmental Law 39 Envtl. L., No. 2, Spring, 2009. Environmental Law Reporter News & Analysis 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis, No. 6, June, 2009. Florida A&M University Law Review 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev., No. 1, Spring, 2008. Florida Tax Review 9 Fla. Tax Rev., No. 3, Pp; 161-214, 2008. Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J., No. 2, Spring, 2009. Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y, No. 1, Fall, 2008. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L., No. 1, Fall, 2008. Indiana Law Journal 84 Ind. L.J., No. 3, Summer, 2009. John Marshall Law Review 42 J. Marshall L. Rev., No. 2, Winter, 2009. Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L., No. 2, Pp. 273-494, 2009. Journal of Law and Policy 17 J.L. & Pol’y, No. 1, Pp. 1-402, 2008. Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A., No. 2, Winter-Spring, 2009. Law & Society Review 43 Law & Soc’y Rev., No. 2-3, June, 2009. Marquette Sports Law Review 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev., No. 2, Spring, 2009. Media Law & Policy 18 Media L. & Pol’y, No. 2, Pp. 95-187, 2009. Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev., No. 2, Spring, 2009. National Black Law Journal 21 Nat’l Black L.J., No. 1, Pp. 1-80, 2009. New York Law School Law Review 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev., No. 3, Pp. 361-686, 2008/09. Ocean Development and International Law 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L., No. 2, April-June, 2009. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J., No. 3, Pp. 437-582, 2009. Phoenix Law Review +1 Phoenix L. Rev., No. 1, Spring, 2008. Stanford Law Review 61 Stan. L. Rev., No. 6, April, 2009. Tax Lawyer 62 Tax Law., No. 1, Fall, 2008. Texas International Law Journal 44 Tex. Int’l L.J., No. 3, Spring, 2009. Touro Law Review 25 Touro L. Rev., No. 1, Pp. 1-539, 2009. UC Davis Journal of Juvenile Law & Policy 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y, No. 2, Summer, 2009. University of Illinois Law Review 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev., No. 3, Pp. 627-1010. Utah Law Review 2008 Utah L. Rev., No. 4, Pp. 1255-1644. Virginia Law & Business Review 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev., No. 1, Spring, 2009. Virginia Tax Review 28 Va. Tax Rev., No. 3, Winter, 2009. William and Mary Law Review 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev., No. 6, May, 2009. +Note new title to CILP indexing. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


July 3, 2009

ACCOUNTING

Pogroszewski, Alan. When is a CPA as important as your ERA? A comprehensive evaluation and examination of state tax issues on professional athletes. 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 395-417 (2009).

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Atwood, Denise A. Comment. Riding helmetless: personal freedom or societal burden? 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 269-293 (2008). Bauerle, Keith G. The Ninth Circuit’s “clarifications” in Lands Council v. McNair: much ado about nothing? 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 203-254 (2009). Bergman, Hannah H. Comment. The CIA’s public operational files: accessing files exempt from the CIA Information Act of 1984 because of investigations into illegal or improper activity. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 99-128 (2008). Brisman, Avi and Alison Rau. From fear of crime to fear of nature: the problem with permitting loaded, concealed firearms in national parks. 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 255-272 (2009). Colbert, R. Caleb. Note. No, you can’t: the Ninth Circuit says “no” to change. (Natural Resources Defense Council v. Environmental Protection Agency, 526 F.3d 591, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 574-593 (2009). Fisher, Kristina G. The Rhino in the Colonia: how Colonias Development Council v. Rhino Environmental Services, Inc. set a substantive state standard for environmental justice. 39 Envtl. L. 397-430 (2009). Greene, Matthew H. The HOPE VI paradox: why do HUD’s most successful housing developments fail to benefit the poorest of the poor? 17 J.L. & Pol’y 191-229 (2008). Ho, Joshua H. Enhancing safety, security, and environmental protection of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore: the cooperative mechanism. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 233-247 (2009). Miller, Kenneth. Penn Central for tomorrow: making regulatory takings predictable. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10457-10470 (2009). Potapov, Alex. Making regulatory takings reform work: the lessons of Oregon’s Measure 37. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10516-10540 (2009). Rana, Shruti. “Streamlining” the rule of law: how the Department of Justice is undermining judicial review of agency action. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 829-893. Rubin, Gary. CFTC Regulation 1.59 fails to adequately regulate insider trading. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 599-624 (2008/09). Seele, Erin P. Note. The door finally opens to challenge agency decisions thet affect the environment. (Board of County Commissioners of Sumner County v. Bremby, 189 P.3d 494, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 612-630 (2009).

Smith, Douglas G. An administrative approach to the resolution of mass torts? (Reviewing Richard A. Nagareda, Mass Torts in a World of Settlement.) 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 895-909. Snyder, Jennifer. Comment. The decision in American Council of the Blind v. Paulson: the Department of Treasury violated the Rehabilitation Act by failing to issue currency that was readily distinguishable by the visually impaired. (Am. Council of the Blind v. Paulson, 525 F.3d 1256, 2008.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 133-148 (2009). Tait, Matthew. Note. A remedy even the plaintiffs don’t like. The D.C. Circuit’s vacatur of the Clean Air Interstate Rule. (North Carolina v. E.P.A., 531 F.3d, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 552-572 (2009). Zotos, Nick A. Service collection abuse of discretion: what is the appropriate standard of review and scope of the record in collection due process appeals? 62 Tax Law. 223-239 (2008).

ADMIRALTY

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea (“Rotterdam Rules”). 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 479-520 (2009). Pradas-Monné, Alicia. Comment. A knot in the line: sea turtle bycatch reduction problems in the United States Atlantic pelagic longline fishery. 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 273-299 (2009). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea (“Rotterdam Rules”). 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 479-520 (2009). Transport Law for the 21st Century: The New UNCITRAL Convention. Articles by Mary Helen Carlson, Jose Angelo Estrella Faria, Johan Schelin, Alexander von Ziegler, Tomotaka Fujita, Gertjan van der Ziel, Manuel Alba, Chester D. Hooper and Michael F. Sturley. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 269-455 (2009).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Texas International Law Journal.)

AGRICULTURE LAW

Cremer, Jacob T. Tractors versus bulldozers: integrating growth management and ecosystem services to conserve agriculture. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10541-10554 (2009). de Lima Mantilla, Yuri. The survival of the United States ethanol subsidies and tariff: are there further reasons to keep them on the books? 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 203-225 (2008). Eubanks, William S. II. The sustainable Farm Bill: a proposal for permanent environmental change. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10493-10509 (2009).


July 3, 2009

ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT

Alter, Denise M. Corporate art collecting and fiduciary duties to shareholders: legal duties and best practices for directors and officers. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 1-66. Brauneis, Robert. Copyright and the world’s most popular song. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 335-426 (2009). Chung, Steven. Note. Real taxation of virtual commerce. 28 Va. Tax Rev. 733-778 (2009). Harris, Keith. Note. For promotional use only: is the resale of a promotional CD protected by the first sale doctrine? 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1745-1772 (2009). Livingston, Margit. Inspiration or imitation: copyright protection for stage directions. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 427-487 (2009). Schaeffer, Maritza. Note. Contemporary issues in the visual art realm: how useful are Creative Commons licenses? 17 J.L. & Pol’y 359-402 (2008). Wan, Yong. Legal protection of performers’ rights in the Chinese Copyright Law. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 669-694 (2009). Symposium. Media, Justice, and the Law. Introduction by Jessica Oats; articles by Simon A. Cole, Rachel Dioso-Villa, Russell D. Covey, William R. Montriss, Jr., Patrick Mulvaney and Russell K. Robinson. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1333-1533 (2009).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Stanford Law Review.)

BANKING AND FINANCE

Byrnes, Erin M. Case comment. (Cohen v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., 498 F.3d 111, 2007.) 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 673-684 (2008/09). Collins, Justin. Note. Without other options: the limited effectiveness, unique availability, and overall impact of state-directed lawsuits against predatory lenders. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 231-269 (2008). Davis, Ian. Student article. Rural banking: designing an effective framework for microfinance. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 394-423 (2009). Hunt, John P. Credit rating agencies and the “worldwide credit crisis”: the limits of reputation, the insufficiency of reform, and a proposal for improvement. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 109-209. Paulsen, Jeffrey Kimball. Note. Credit card disclosures and the elderly: will the proposed amendments to Regulation Z help the elderly understand credit card documents? 17 Elder L.J. 125-163 (2009). Reed, Brendan J. Note. Sovereign wealth funds: the new barbarians at the gate? An analysis of the legal and business implications of their ascendancy. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 97-138 (2009).

Snyder, Jennifer. Comment. The decision in American Council of the Blind v. Paulson: the Department of Treasury violated the Rehabilitation Act by failing to issue currency that was readily distinguishable by the visually impaired. (Am. Council of the Blind v. Paulson, 525 F.3d 1256, 2008.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 133-148 (2009).

BANKRUPTCY LAW

Giblin, Thomas J. Note. Financial markets in bankruptcy court: how much uncertainty remains after BAPCPA? 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 284-325. Miller, Ken. Using letters of credit, credit default swaps and other forms of credit enhancements in net lease transactions. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 45-80 (2009). Schlusselberg, Adam. Case comment. In re Davis. (Davis v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp., 373 B.R. 241, 2007.) 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 639-652 (2008/09).

CIVIL RIGHTS AND DISCRIMINATION

Bell, Jeannine. Restraining the heartless: racist speech and minority rights. 84 Ind. L.J. 963-979 (2009). Bidlack, Christopher. Comment. The prohibition of prosthetic limbs in American sports: the issues and the role of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 613-637 (2009). Burguan, Jessica J. Comment. Disregarding diversity. (Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, No. 1, 127 S. Ct. 2738, 2007.) 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 159-183 (2008). Caifano, Catherine R. Comment. When the music stops, why not require certain Title VII plaintiffs to find a chair on which to rest their complaint? 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 505-528 (2009). Daggan, Clinton N. Case comment. (Chi Iota Colony of Alpha Epsilon Pi Franternity v. City Univ. of N.Y., 502 F.3d 136, 2007.) 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 627-637 (2008/09). Fahy, Garrett M. Student article. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007): faithful to Title VII or blind to sex discrimination? 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 359-393 (2009). Hovey, Jaime E. Note. Nursing wounds: why LGBT elders need protection from discrimination and abuse based on sexual orientation and gender identity. 17 Elder L.J. 95-123 (2009). LeGrand, Andrew. Note. Narrowing the tailoring: how Parents Involved limits the use of race in higher education admissions. 21 Nat’l Black L.J. 53-80 (2009). Murrer, Christopher G. Comment. A call for uniform application of the Americans with Disabilities Act: does Title II support a claim for employment discrimination? 47 Duq. L. Rev. 115-131 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Peresie, Jennifer L. Toward a coherent test for disparate impact discrimination. 84 Ind. L.J. 773-802 (2009). Robinson, Kimberly Jenkins. The constitutional future of race-neutral efforts to achieve diversity and avoid racial isolation in elementary and secondary schools. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 277-362 (2009). Schmidt, Christopher W. “Freedom comes only from the law”: the debate over law’s capacity and the making of Brown v. Board of Education. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1493-1559. Sharifi, Ghazal. Comment. Is the door open or closed? Evaluating the future of the federal medical peer-review privilege. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 561-593 (2009). Snyder, Jennifer. Comment. The decision in American Council of the Blind v. Paulson: the Department of Treasury violated the Rehabilitation Act by failing to issue currency that was readily distinguishable by the visually impaired. (Am. Council of the Blind v. Paulson, 525 F.3d 1256, 2008.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 133-148 (2009). Wolf, Robert V. Race, bias, and problem-solving courts. 21 Nat’l Black L.J. 27-52 (2009). Zehrt, Lynn Ridgeway. A decade later: Adarand and Croson and the status of minority preferences in government contracting. 21 Nat’l Black L.J. 1-26 (2009). An Obvious Truth: Creating an Action Blueprint for a Civil Right to Counsel in New York State. Introductions by Andrew Scherer and Lawrence Raful; remarks by Kathryn Grant Madigan, Bernice K. Leber and Laura K. Abel; keynote address by Wade Henderson; panel participation with Andrew Sherer, moderator, Martha F. Davis, Debra Gardner, Rosie Mendez, Hon. Juanita Bing Newton, Adriene Holder and Laura Klein Abel, panelists; articles by Paul Marvy, Laura Klein Abel, Martha F. Davis, Raymond H. Brescia, Stephen Loffredo, Don Friedman, Dennis A. Kaufman and Kia C. Franklin. 25 Touro L. Rev. 1-489 (2009).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Touro Law Review.)

COMMUNICATIONS LAW

(For other articles on COMMUNICATIONS LAW see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Media Law & Policy.) Auerbach, Shira. Note. Screening out cyberbullies: remedies for victims on the Internet playground. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1641-1675 (2009). Chung, Steven. Note. Real taxation of virtual commerce. 28 Va. Tax Rev. 733-778 (2009).

Duan, Liu. Recent decision. Broadband Internet access service transmitted via wireless (digital subscriber line, DSL) is an information service and thus is not subject to the Title II regulation of the Communications Act, and telephone companies are not required to afford non-facility-based independent Internet service providers with nondiscriminatory access to the companies’ wireline facilities. (Time Warner Telecom, Inc. v. FCC, 507 F.3d 205, 2007.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 149-178 (2009). Gesiko, Agnes. The protection of taxpayer’s federal tax return information in the Internet Age--is tax return information being afforded proper confidentiality and privacy protections? 62 Tax Law. 175-187 (2008). Lee, Rachel C. Note. Ex parte blogging: the legal ethics of Supreme Court advocacy in the Internet era. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1535-1571 (2009). Lewis, Erik P. Note. Unmasking “Anon12345”: applying an appropriate standard when private citizens seek the identity of anonymous Internet defamation defendants. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 947-973. Peguera, Miquel. When the cached link is the weakest link: search engine caches under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 589-645 (2009). Tabor, Jacob. Note. Students’ First Amendment rights in the age of the Internet: off-campus cyberspeech and school regulation. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 561-604 (2009). Tene, Omer. What Google knows: privacy and Internet search engines. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1433-1492. Tokson, Matthew J. The content/envelope distinction in Internet law. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2105-2176 (2009). Walker, Adam. Thumbnails, search engines, and copyrights: a whole mess of confusion. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 647-667 (2009). Symposium. Media, Justice, and the Law. Introduction by Jessica Oats; articles by Simon A. Cole, Rachel Dioso-Villa, Russell D. Covey, William R. Montriss, Jr., Patrick Mulvaney and Russell K. Robinson. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1333-1533 (2009).


COMPARATIVE AND FOREIGN LAW

Adamski, Dariusz. Broadband stimulus policy in Europe ant the US: a comparative review. 18 Media L. & Pol’y 139-157 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Alnajafi, Nada. Protecting the past in the future: how copyright is wrong for Egypt and why other sui generis laws may help protect the Pyramids and other cultural antiquities. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 243-263 (2009). Bateman, Sam and Michael White. Compulsory pilotage in the Torres Straight: overcoming unacceptable risks to a sensitive marine environment. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 184-203 (2009). Devlin, Alan and Michael Jacobs. Microsoft’s five fatal flaws. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 67-108. Elliot-Meisel, Elizabeth. Politics, pride, and precedent: the United States and Canada in the Northwest Passage. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 204-232 (2009). Erbe, Nancy, et al. Negotiating and mediating peace. 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 457-494 (2009). Ho, Joshua H. Enhancing safety, security, and environmental protection of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore: the cooperative mechanism. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 233-247 (2009). Kiryabwire, Geoffrey. The development of the commercial judicial system in Uganda: a study of the Commercial Court Division, High Court of Uganda. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 349-358 (2009). Klimas, Tadas and Jūratė Vaičiukaitė. The law of recitals in European Community legislation. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 61-93 (2008). Koivurova, Timo. A note on the European Union’s Integrated Maritime Policy. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 171-183 (2009). Liang, Zhiwen. Beyond the Copyright Act: the fair use doctrine under Chinese judicial opinions. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 695-717 (2009). Naser, M.A. and W.H. Muhaisen. Intellectual property: an Islamic perspective. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 571-587 (2009). Ng, Kwai Hang. “If I lie, I tell you, may heaven and earth destroy me.” Language and legal consequences in Hong Kong bilingual common law. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 369-403 (2009). Tankebe, Justice. Self-help, policing, and procedural justice: Ghanaian vigilantism and the rule of law. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 245-269 (2009). Tezcür, Güneş Murat. Judicial activism in perilous times: the Turkish case. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 305-336 (2009). Wan, Yong. Legal protection of performers’ rights in the Chinese Copyright Law. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 669-694 (2009). Panel VII: Congress in Comparative Perspective. Articles by Kim Lane Scheppele, Graham K. Wilson, John Uhr and Michael E. Libonati. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 795-870 (2009).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Boston University Law Review.)

Spring 2008 Symposium: The 60th Anniversary of the Declaration of Human Rights: A Reality Check. Articles by Johannes van Aggelen, Adam McBeth, Fernne Brennan, Johan D. van der Vyver, Dina Francesca Haynes, John Cary Sims, Miguel Gonzales Marcos, Johanna Gibson, William M. Carter, Jr. Nsongurua Udombana and Don Wedll. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 1-401 (2008).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy.)

Symposium: An Ocean Apart? Freedom of Expression in Europe and the United States. Foreword by Elisabeth Zoller; articles by Jean-François Flauss, Eric Barendt, Olivier Jouanjan, Elisabeth Zoller, Daniel A. Farber, Geoffrey R. Stone, Jeannine Bell, C. Edwin Baker, Susan H. Williams and Patrick Morvan. 84 Ind. L.J. 803-1046 (2009).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Indiana Law Journal.)

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, GENERALLY

Blackwell, Kevin. Comment. State constitutional adjudication in a footnote? A critique of the Supreme Court of Louisiana’s decision in ... (State v. Kennedy, 957 So. 2d 757, 2007.) 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1213-1240 (2008). Chamberlain, Katherine A. Note. Looking for a “good death”: the elderly terminally ill’s right to die by physician-assisted suicide. 17 Elder L.J. 61-93 (2009). Echeverria, John D. Making sense of Penn Central. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10471-10486 (2009). Eddy, Gordon. Court study. The development of independent New York constitutional jurisprudence in Chief Judge Kaye’s judicial opinions: an empirical study. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1137-1161 (2008). McGuinness, Martin. Comment. The “silver platter” in the context of state constitutional adjudication. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1241-1254 (2008). Roan, Tyson B. Anything but doomed: why restrictions on offshoring are permissible under the Constitution and trade agreements. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 209-251 (2009). Rohr, Jonathan. Note. Assessing the scope of Williamson County: why it should be applied to private purpose claims. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1809-1842 (2009). Sundahl, Mark J. The living Constitution of ancient Athens: a comparative perspective on the originalism debate. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 463-504 (2009). Woodyard, William and Glenn Boggs. Public outcry: Kelo v. City of New London--a proposed solution. 39 Envtl. L. 431-450 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Symposium: The “Partial-Birth Abortion” Ban: Health Care in the Shadow of Criminal Liability. Articles by Talcott Camp, Caitlin E. Borgmann, David D. Meyer and Priscilla J. Smith. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 1-160 (2008).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Journal of Law and Policy.)

Symposium. The Most Disparaged Branch: The Role of Congress in the Twenty-First Century. Foreword by Jill Hamers and Bret A. Finkelstein; keynote address by Jeremy Waldron; articles by David R. Mayhew, Kenneth A. Shepsle, Barbara Sinclair, Gary Lawson, Sanford Levinson, Vlad Perju, Ann Seidman, Robert B. Seidman, Alan L. Feld, Mark Tushnet, Jeffrey K. Tulis, Michael J. Gerhardt, Lani Guinier, Linda C. McClain, Stephen Macedo, James E. Fleming, Jane S. Schacter, Sotirios A. Barber, Nancy Rosenblum, Jack M. Beermann, Douglas Kriner, Kim Lane Scheppele, Graham K. Wilson, John Uhr and Michael E. Libonati; responses by Hugh Baxter, Gerald N. Rosenberg, Robert Post, Frederick C. Harris and Adrian Vermeule. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 331-870 (2009).


CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW

Martin, Nathalie. Consumer scams and the elderly: preserving independence through shifting default rules. 17 Elder L.J. 1-30 (2009).

CONTRACTS

Eisenberg, Theodore and Geoffrey P. Miller. The flight to New York: an empirical study of choice of law and choice of forum clauses in publicly-held companies’ contracts. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1475-1512 (2009). Moody, Gerald M., Jr. Note. Writing is reading is writing: two applications of the parole evidence rule to collective bargaining agreements. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 326-356.

CORPORATIONS

(For other articles on CORPORATIONS see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law and Virginia Law & Business Review.) Alter, Denise M. Corporate art collecting and fiduciary duties to shareholders: legal duties and best practices for directors and officers. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 1-66. Miller, Robert T. The economics of deal risk: allocating risk through MAC clauses in business combination agreements. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2007-2103 (2009). The Corporation Counsel: Reflections on the New York City Law Department. Introduction by Ross Sandler; articles by Edward I. Koch, Frederick A. O. Schwartz, Jr., Peter L. Zimroth, Hon. O. Peter Sherwood, Hon. Paul A. Crotty, Michael A. Cardozo, Jeffrey D. Friedlander, Gail Rubin, Leonard Koerner, William E. Nelson, Ross Sandler and William P. LaPiana. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 365-573 (2008/09).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for New York Law School Law Review.)

COURTS

Maida, Lauren. Note. Patent claim construction: it’s not a pure matter of law, so why isn’t the Federal Circuit giving the district courts the deference they deserve? 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1773-1807 (2009). Wolf, Robert V. Race, bias, and problem-solving courts. 21 Nat’l Black L.J. 27-52 (2009). Symposium: Judges on Judges: The New State Court of Appeals Judges’ Own Favorites in Court History. Introductions by Vincent Martin Bonventre and Judge Albert M. Rosenblatt; articles by Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye, Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, Judge Victoria A. Graffeo, Judge Susan Phillips Read, Judge Robert S. Smith, Judge Eugene F. Pigott, Jr. and Judge Theodore T. Jones, Jr. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1045-1090 (2008).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Albany Law Review.)

CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE

(For other articles on CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law.) Arcila, Fabio, Jr. The Framers’ search power: the misunderstood statutory history of suspicion & probable cause. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 363-426 (2009). Ball, W. David. Heinous, atrocious, and cruel: Apprendi, indeterminate sentencing, and the meaning of punishment. 109 Colum. L. Rev. 893-972 (2009). Breitenbach, Katherine G. Note. Battling the threat: the successful prosecution of domestic violence after ... . (Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 2006.) 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1255-1286 (2008). Brisman, Avi and Alison Rau. From fear of crime to fear of nature: the problem with permitting loaded, concealed firearms in national parks. 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 255-272 (2009). Burnett, Christina Duffy. A convenient Constitution? Extraterritoriality after Boumediene. 109 Colum. L. Rev. 973-1046 (2009). Bush, Jonathan A. The prehistory of corporations and conspiracy in international criminal law: what Nuremberg really said. 109 Colum. L. Rev. 1094-1262 (2009). Colb, Sherry F. Why is torture “different” and how “different” is it? 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1411-1473 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Dunn, Kerry and Paul J. Kaplan. The ironies of helping: social interventions and executable subjects. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 337-368 (2009). Echard, Trent. Comment. Clark v. Arizona: has the Court painted itself into a corner? (Clark v. Arizona, 126 S. Ct. 2709, 2006.) 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 213-267 (2008). Eddy, Gordon. Comment. Throwing stones from within a glass house: why the procedural approach to confrontation fails to remedy the ills of the indicia of reliability test, and an argument for a balanced rule. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1287-1315 (2008). Frumkin, Jacob. Comment. Perennial punishment? Why the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act needs reconsideration. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 313-358 (2008). Garrett, Aaron C. Note. New theories of guilt on appeal in Virginia criminal cases. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2177-2214 (2009). Gerst, Hon. Stephen A. Comparative proportionality analysis: its feasibility and usefulness in sentencing. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 59-115 (2008). Hallevy, Gabriel. The defense attorney as mediator in plea bargains. 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 495-525 (2009). Huigens, Kyron. The continuity of justification defenses. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 627-695. Kaplan, Connie. No end in sight: the effect of the Boumediene decision on detainees held by the United States at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 183-201 (2008). Kebric, Angela. Comment. Polygraph testing in sex offender treatment: a constitutional and essential tool for effective treatment. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 429-452 (2009). Kucinski, Melissa A. Culture in international parental kidnapping mediations. 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 555-582 (2009). Kurland, Abigail. Comment. The extraterritorial reach of the Great Writ at common law: the constitution guarantees the Guantanamo Bay detainees a right to habeas corpus. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 67-97 (2008). Lalezari, Babak. Comment. Domestic violence: enough is enough, any force is enough. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 295-319 (2008). Mayer, Ashley P. Secure detention: the plight of juveniles in Florida who are incompetent to stand trial. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 239-280 (2009). Mumford, Bradley N. Comment. Make it mean something: the case for broader protection from cruel and unusual punishment under the Arizona Constitution. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 453-481 (2009). Priester, Benjamin J. Who is a “terrorist”? Drawing the line between criminal defendants and military enemies. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1255-1337.

Ruotolo, Lyndsay V. Case comment. (United States v. Grier, 475 F.3d 556, 2007.) 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 655-671 (2008/09). Sabourin, Nathan. Court study. We’re from Vermont and we do what we want: a “re”-examination of the criminal jurisprudence of the Vermont Supreme Court. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1163-1211 (2008). Thornburg, James. Recent decision. Aliens detained at Guantanamo Bay have a constitutional right to file habeas corpus petitions in federal court. (Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229, 2008.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 179-200 (2009). Tokson, Matthew J. The content/envelope distinction in Internet law. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2105-2176 (2009). Winzeler, Zack L. Comment. Whoa, whoa, whoa...one at a time: examining the responses to the Illinois study on double-blind sequential lineup procedures. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1595-1612. 2008 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition Distinguished Briefs. Winning briefs by Ateneo de Manila University and University of Ottawa Common Law Section. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 227-314 (2008).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law.)

Symposium. Media, Justice, and the Law. Introduction by Jessica Oats; articles by Simon A. Cole, Rachel Dioso-Villa, Russell D. Covey, William R. Montriss, Jr., Patrick Mulvaney and Russell K. Robinson. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1333-1533 (2009).


DISPUTE RESOLUTION

(For other articles on DISPUTE RESOLUTION see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal.) Cooper, Michael B. Case note. Class-less? An analysis of the California Supreme Court’s denial of employers’ right to use class arbitration waivers in employment agreements in Gentry v. Superior Court. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 459-493 (2009). de Lima Mantilla, Yuri. The survival of the United States ethanol subsidies and tariff: are there further reasons to keep them on the books? 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 203-225 (2008). Hooper, Chester D. Forum selection and arbitration in the draft Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, or the definition of fora conveniens set forth in the Rotterdam Rules. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 417-426 (2009).


July 3, 2009

DOMESTIC RELATIONS

Breitenbach, Katherine G. Note. Battling the threat: the successful prosecution of domestic violence after ... . (Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 2006.) 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1255-1286 (2008). Ellis, Benjamin M. Note. Protecting the right to marital property: ensuring a full equitable distribution award with fraudulent conveyance law. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1709-1743 (2009). Johnson, Jeffrey L. Privacy, authenticity, & equality: the moral and legal case for the right to homosexual marriage. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 21-40 (2008). Kucinski, Melissa A. Culture in international parental kidnapping mediations. 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 555-582 (2009). Lalezari, Babak. Comment. Domestic violence: enough is enough, any force is enough. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 295-319 (2008). Ryznar, Margaret. Two to tango, one in limbo: a comparative analysis of fathers’ rights in infant adoptions. 47 Duq. L. Rev. 89-114 (2009). Schleppenbach, John R. Strange bedfellows: why older straight couples should advocate for the passage of the Illinois Civil Union Act. 17 Elder L.J. 31-59 (2009). Vanderbeek, Christopher D. Case note. Oh, brother! A California appeals court reaffirms the denial of necessary access for separated children to build and maintain sibling relationships In re Miguel A. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 349-381 (2009). Symposium: The “Partial-Birth Abortion” Ban: Health Care in the Shadow of Criminal Liability. Articles by Talcott Camp, Caitlin E. Borgmann, David D. Meyer and Priscilla J. Smith. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 1-160 (2008).


ECONOMICS

Brogan, Patrick S. The economic benefits of broadband and information technology. 18 Media L. & Pol’y 159-187 (2009). Morriss, Andrew P., et al. Green jobs myths. 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 326-473 (2009). Pearce, Alan and Michael S. Pagano. Accelerated wireless broadband infrastructure deployment: the impact on GDP and employment. 18 Media L. & Pol’y 105-127 (2009). Turgeon, Evan N. Note. Boom and bust for whom?: the economic philosophy behind the 2008 financial crisis. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 141-186 (2009). van der Vyver, Jonan D. The binding force of economic and social rights listed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 125-173 (2008).

EDUCATION LAW

Bennett, Heather P. Comment. “Pick”ering the speech rights of public school teachers: arguing for a movement by courts toward the Hazelwood-Tinker standard under the First Amendment. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 41-65 (2008). Burguan, Jessica J. Comment. Disregarding diversity. (Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, No. 1, 127 S. Ct. 2738, 2007.) 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 159-183 (2008). Daggan, Clinton N. Case comment. (Chi Iota Colony of Alpha Epsilon Pi Franternity v. City Univ. of N.Y., 502 F.3d 136, 2007.) 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 627-637 (2008/09). Friedelbaum, Stanley H. Educational issues and judicial oversight. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1091-1127 (2008). Greenblatt, Jennifer L. Using the Equal Protection Clause post-VMI to keep gender stereotypes out of the public school dress code equation. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 281-297 (2009). LeGrand, Andrew. Note. Narrowing the tailoring: how Parents Involved limits the use of race in higher education admissions. 21 Nat’l Black L.J. 53-80 (2009). Oluwole, Joseph O. The genesis of gangrenes in the student free speech taxonomy. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 299-331 (2009). Pappas, Katherine L. Comment. Can an equal protection claim pass the test when educational financing is challenged?: a case for the rational basis standard. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 483-503 (2009). Petersburg, Benjamin. Student article. Reconciling the McKinney-Vento Act with the vision of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: improving local educational agency liaisons’ ability to serve America’s homeless children. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 447-484 (2008). Robinson, Kimberly Jenkins. The constitutional future of race-neutral efforts to achieve diversity and avoid racial isolation in elementary and secondary schools. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 277-362 (2009). Schlusselberg, Adam. Case comment. In re Davis. (Davis v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp., 373 B.R. 241, 2007.) 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 639-652 (2008/09). Tabor, Jacob. Note. Students’ First Amendment rights in the age of the Internet: off-campus cyberspeech and school regulation. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 561-604 (2009). Zirkel, Perry A, and Youssef Chouhoud. The Goss progeny: a follow-up outcomes analysis. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 333-348 (2009).


July 3, 2009

ELDER LAW

(For articles on ELDER LAW see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Elder Law Journal.)

EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE

(For other articles on EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal.) Caifano, Catherine R. Comment. When the music stops, why not require certain Title VII plaintiffs to find a chair on which to rest their complaint? 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 505-528 (2009). Cooper, Michael B. Case note. Class-less? An analysis of the California Supreme Court’s denial of employers’ right to use class arbitration waivers in employment agreements in Gentry v. Superior Court. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 459-493 (2009). Murrer, Christopher G. Comment. A call for uniform application of the Americans with Disabilities Act: does Title II support a claim for employment discrimination? 47 Duq. L. Rev. 115-131 (2009). Pearce, Alan and Michael S. Pagano. Accelerated wireless broadband infrastructure deployment: the impact on GDP and employment. 18 Media L. & Pol’y 105-127 (2009).

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

(For other articles on ENVIRONMENTAL LAW see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Environmental Law, Environmental Law Reporter News & Analysis, Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal and Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review.) Blodgett, Mark S., Richard J. Hunter, Jr. and Hector R. Lozada. A primer on international environmental law and custom. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 15-31 (2008). Perkins, Nancy D. Principled preemption in an age of interest convergence: preserving the distinction between Pennsylvania’s environmental regulation and local land use regulation. 47 Duq. L. Rev. 27-87 (2009). Schoenbaum, Lauren Jensen. Comment. The Okinawa dugong and the creative application of U.S. extraterritorial environmental law. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 457-478 (2009). Thornton, Dorothy, Robert A. Kagan and Neil Gunningham. When social norms and pressures are not enough: environmental performance in the trucking industry. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 405-435 (2009).

ESTATES AND TRUSTS

Benjamin, Jeremy. Note. Reinvigorating nonprofit directors’ duty of obedience. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1677-1708 (2009).

EVIDENCE

Beecher-Monas, Erica. Reality bites: the illusion of science in bite-mark evidence. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1369-1410 (2009). Kebric, Angela. Comment. Polygraph testing in sex offender treatment: a constitutional and essential tool for effective treatment. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 429-452 (2009). Lawhead, Alan. Useful limits to the Fifth Amendment: examining the benefits that flow from a private regulator’s ability to demand answers to its questions during an investigation. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 210-283. Sharifi, Ghazal. Comment. Is the door open or closed? Evaluating the future of the federal medical peer-review privilege. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 561-593 (2009). Tokson, Matthew J. The content/envelope distinction in Internet law. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2105-2176 (2009). Weissenberger, Glen. The proper interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence: insights from Article VI. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1615-1639 (2009). Winzeler, Zack L. Comment. Whoa, whoa, whoa...one at a time: examining the responses to the Illinois study on double-blind sequential lineup procedures. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1595-1612.

FIRST AMENDMENT

Bennett, Heather P. Comment. “Pick”ering the speech rights of public school teachers: arguing for a movement by courts toward the Hazelwood-Tinker standard under the First Amendment. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 41-65 (2008). Koppelman, Andrew. Corruption of religion and the Establishment Clause. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1831-1935 (2009). Lewis, Erik P. Note. Unmasking “Anon12345”: applying an appropriate standard when private citizens seek the identity of anonymous Internet defamation defendants. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 947-973. Morriss, Andrew P. and Benjamin D. Cramer. Disestablishing environmentalism. 39 Envtl. L. 309-396 (2009). Oluwole, Joseph O. The genesis of gangrenes in the student free speech taxonomy. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 299-331 (2009). Tabor, Jacob. Note. Students’ First Amendment rights in the age of the Internet: off-campus cyberspeech and school regulation. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 561-604 (2009).


July 3, 2009



FOOD AND DRUG LAW

Burns, Kimberly A. and Alan R. Spies. A pharmacist’s duty to warn: promoting the acceptance of a consistent legal and professional standard. 47 Duq. L. Rev. 1-26 (2009). Edelman, Gabriel. Comment. The New York City trans fat ban: a healthy law. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 271-311 (2008).

FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

Echard, Trent. Comment. Clark v. Arizona: has the Court painted itself into a corner? (Clark v. Arizona, 126 S. Ct. 2709, 2006.) 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 213-267 (2008). Zirkel, Perry A, and Youssef Chouhoud. The Goss progeny: a follow-up outcomes analysis. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 333-348 (2009).

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

Halpin, Michael W. Note. Is the living wage dead in Detroit? The role of stare decisis, home rule, and policy preferences in the Michigan Supreme Court. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 911-945. Roan, Tyson B. Anything but doomed: why restrictions on offshoring are permissible under the Constitution and trade agreements. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 209-251 (2009). Sheehy, Benedict and Jackson N. Maogoto. The private military company--unravelling the theoretical, legal & regulatory mosaic. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 147-181 (2008). Zehrt, Lynn Ridgeway. A decade later: Adarand and Croson and the status of minority preferences in government contracting. 21 Nat’l Black L.J. 1-26 (2009).

HEALTH LAW AND POLICY

Burke, Karen C. and Grayson M.P. McCouch. COBRA strikes back: anatomy of a tax shelter. 62 Tax Law. 59-92 (2008). Edelman, Gabriel. Comment. The New York City trans fat ban: a healthy law. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 271-311 (2008). Franklin, Kia C. Advocacy in health proceedings in New York State. 25 Touro L. Rev. 437-465 (2009). MacIsaac, Kristen. Note. Medicare’s August Rule: necessary step toward minimizing federal spending or overboard decision leading to higher malpractice costs? 50 B.C. L. Rev. 533-560 (2009).

Sharifi, Ghazal. Comment. Is the door open or closed? Evaluating the future of the federal medical peer-review privilege. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 561-593 (2009). Sommers, Caroline. Student article. There is no perfect solution to health care in America. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 424-458 (2009).

HOUSING LAW

Greene, Matthew H. The HOPE VI paradox: why do HUD’s most successful housing developments fail to benefit the poorest of the poor? 17 J.L. & Pol’y 191-229 (2008).

HUMAN RIGHTS LAW

Davis, Martha F. In the interests of justice: human rights and the right to counsel in civil cases. 25 Touro L. Rev. 147-185 (2009). Holzmeyer, Cheryl. Human rights in an era of neoliberal globalization: the Alien Tort Claims Act and grassroots mobilization in Day v. Unocal. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 271-304 (2009). Petersburg, Benjamin. Student article. Reconciling the McKinney-Vento Act with the vision of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: improving local educational agency liaisons’ ability to serve America’s homeless children. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 447-484 (2008). Wilson, Mark W. Comment. Why private remedies for environmental torts under the Alien Tort Statute should not be constrained by the judicially created doctrines of jus cogens and exhaustion. 39 Envtl. L. 451-479 (2009). Spring 2008 Symposium: The 60th Anniversary of the Declaration of Human Rights: A Reality Check. Articles by Johannes van Aggelen, Adam McBeth, Fernne Brennan, Johan D. van der Vyver, Dina Francesca Haynes, John Cary Sims, Miguel Gonzales Marcos, Johanna Gibson, William M. Carter, Jr. Nsongurua Udombana and Don Wedll. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 1-401 (2008).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy.)




July 3, 2009

IMMIGRATION LAW

O’Brien, Katherine M. Note. No match? No thanks: how the Department of Homeland Security’s no-match rule puts the jobs of legal immigrants in jeopardy. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 975-1009. Postville Raids Symposium. Articles by Erik Camayd-Freixas, Rockne Cole, Sioban Albiol, R. Linus Chan, Sarah J. Diaz, Virginia Martinez, Jazmin Garcia and Jasmine Vasquez. 2 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. 1-140 (2008).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for DePaul Journal for Social Justice.)

INDIAN AND ABORIGINAL LAW

Bonnett, Nancy Williams. Native American retirement plans: the law in the aftermath of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 147-158 (2008). Wedll, Don. The United National Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and its relevance to American Indians in Minnesota and beyond. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 387-401 (2008).

INSURANCE LAW

Burke, Karen C. and Grayson M.P. McCouch. COBRA strikes back: anatomy of a tax shelter. 62 Tax Law. 59-92 (2008). Coughenour, Amy M. Comment. Appraisal and the property insurance appraisal clause--a critical analysis: guidance and recommendations for Arizona. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 403-427 (2009).

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

(For other articles on INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A..) Azar, Deborah. A method to protect computer programs: the integration of copyright, trade secrets, and anticircumvention measures. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1395-1431. Bilsky, Daniel. From parts unknown: WWE v. Jim Hellwig in the ultimate battle for character copyright. 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 419-436 (2009). Harris, Keith. Note. For promotional use only: is the resale of a promotional CD protected by the first sale doctrine? 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1745-1772 (2009). Livingston, Margit. Inspiration or imitation: copyright protection for stage directions. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 427-487 (2009). Maida, Lauren. Note. Patent claim construction: it’s not a pure matter of law, so why isn’t the Federal Circuit giving the district courts the deference they deserve? 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1773-1807 (2009).

Martin, Erin E. Note. The intersection between finance and intellectual property: trade secrets, hedge funds, and Section 13(f) of the Exchange Act. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 575-597 (2008/09). McKenna, Mark P. Trademark use and the problem of source. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 773-828. Schaeffer, Maritza. Note. Contemporary issues in the visual art realm: how useful are Creative Commons licenses? 17 J.L. & Pol’y 359-402 (2008).

INTERNATIONAL LAW

(For other articles on INTERNATIONAL LAW see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law and Texas International Law Journal.) Bush, Jonathan A. The prehistory of corporations and conspiracy in international criminal law: what Nuremberg really said. 109 Colum. L. Rev. 1094-1262 (2009). Kucinski, Melissa A. Culture in international parental kidnapping mediations. 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 555-582 (2009). Markel, Asa William. International litigation in Arizona: litigating foreign country judgments in Arizona. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 117-145 (2008).

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Benshalom, Ilan. Taxing the financial income of multinational enterprises by employing a hybrid formulary and arm’s length allocation method. 28 Va. Tax Rev. 619-671 (2009). Cabin, Michael A. Note. Labor rights in the Peru Agreement: can vague principles yield concrete change? 109 Colum. L. Rev. 1047-1093 (2009). de Lima Mantilla, Yuri. The survival of the United States ethanol subsidies and tariff: are there further reasons to keep them on the books? 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 203-225 (2008). Estreicher, Samuel. “Think global, act local”: employee representation in a world of global labor and product market competition. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 81-95 (2009). Reed, Brendan J. Note. Sovereign wealth funds: the new barbarians at the gate? An analysis of the legal and business implications of their ascendancy. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 97-138 (2009). Roan, Tyson B. Anything but doomed: why restrictions on offshoring are permissible under the Constitution and trade agreements. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 209-251 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea (“Rotterdam Rules”). 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 479-520 (2009). Transport Law for the 21st Century: The New UNCITRAL Convention. Articles by Mary Helen Carlson, Jose Angelo Estrella Faria, Johan Schelin, Alexander von Ziegler, Tomotaka Fujita, Gertjan van der Ziel, Manuel Alba, Chester D. Hooper and Michael F. Sturley. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 269-455 (2009).


JUDGES

Eddy, Gordon. Court study. The development of independent New York constitutional jurisprudence in Chief Judge Kaye’s judicial opinions: an empirical study. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1137-1161 (2008). Ellinghausen, Don Jr. “In standing is the preservation of his world”: Justice Scalia and the varieties of natural-religious experience. 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 474-520 (2009). Friedelbaum, Stanley H. Educational issues and judicial oversight. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1091-1127 (2008). Kiryabwire, Geoffrey. The development of the commercial judicial system in Uganda: a study of the Commercial Court Division, High Court of Uganda. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 349-358 (2009). Moberly, Michael D. Judicial protection of forum selection: enforcing private agreements to litigate in state court. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 1-58 (2008). Rana, Shruti. “Streamlining” the rule of law: how the Department of Justice is undermining judicial review of agency action. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 829-893. Seele, Erin P. Note. The door finally opens to challenge agency decisions thet affect the environment. (Board of County Commissioners of Sumner County v. Bremby, 189 P.3d 494, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 612-630 (2009). Tezcür, Güneş Murat. Judicial activism in perilous times: the Turkish case. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 305-336 (2009). Tyler, David W. Note. Clarifying departmentalism: how the Framers’ vision of judicial and presidential review makes the case for deductive judicial supremacy. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2215-2264 (2009). Zotos, Nick A. Service collection abuse of discretion: what is the appropriate standard of review and scope of the record in collection due process appeals? 62 Tax Law. 223-239 (2008).

2008 Caleb Foote Symposium Issue: Prison Reform in California. Articles by Erwin Chemerinsky and Michael P. Jacobsen. 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 307-326 (2008).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law.)

Symposium: Judges on Judges: The New State Court of Appeals Judges’ Own Favorites in Court History. Introductions by Vincent Martin Bonventre and Judge Albert M. Rosenblatt; articles by Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye, Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, Judge Victoria A. Graffeo, Judge Susan Phillips Read, Judge Robert S. Smith, Judge Eugene F. Pigott, Jr. and Judge Theodore T. Jones, Jr. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1045-1090 (2008).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Albany Law Review.)

JURISDICTION

Aughenbaugh, Gregory V. Recent decision. Differential taxation of interest derived from out-of-state municipal bonds does not violate the dormant Commerce Clause. (Department of Revenue v. Davis, 128 S. Ct. 1801, 2008.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 201-219 (2009). Burnett, Christina Duffy. A convenient Constitution? Extraterritoriality after Boumediene. 109 Colum. L. Rev. 973-1046 (2009). Moberly, Michael D. Judicial protection of forum selection: enforcing private agreements to litigate in state court. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 1-58 (2008). Perkins, Nancy D. Principled preemption in an age of interest convergence: preserving the distinction between Pennsylvania’s environmental regulation and local land use regulation. 47 Duq. L. Rev. 27-87 (2009). Schoenbaum, Lauren Jensen. Comment. The Okinawa dugong and the creative application of U.S. extraterritorial environmental law. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 457-478 (2009).

JURISPRUDENCE

Huigens, Kyron. The continuity of justification defenses. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 627-695. Kim, Janine Young. The rhetoric of self defense. 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 261-305 (2008). Stein, Mark S. Nussbaum: a utilitarian critique. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 489-531 (2009).


July 3, 2009

JUVENILES

(For other articles on JUVENILES see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for UC Davis Journal of Juvenile Law & Policy.) Marx, Sarah L. Comment. Seen but not heard: advocating for children in New York State. 25 Touro L. Rev. 491-539 (2009).

LABOR LAW

Cabin, Michael A. Note. Labor rights in the Peru Agreement: can vague principles yield concrete change? 109 Colum. L. Rev. 1047-1093 (2009). Estreicher, Samuel. “Think global, act local”: employee representation in a world of global labor and product market competition. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 81-95 (2009). Halpin, Michael W. Note. Is the living wage dead in Detroit? The role of stare decisis, home rule, and policy preferences in the Michigan Supreme Court. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 911-945. Janda, Ami C. Student article. Keeping a productive labor market: crafting recognition and rights for mentally ill workers. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 403-445 (2008). Moody, Gerald M., Jr. Note. Writing is reading is writing: two applications of the parole evidence rule to collective bargaining agreements. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 326-356. Morriss, Andrew P., et al. Green jobs myths. 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 326-473 (2009). O’Brien, Katherine M. Note. No match? No thanks: how the Department of Homeland Security’s no-match rule puts the jobs of legal immigrants in jeopardy. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 975-1009. Labor Law Group--U.C. Hastings Symposium on the Proposed Restatement of Employment Law. Introduction by Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt; articles by Reuel Schiller, Dennis R. Nolan, Theodore J. St. Antoine, Joseph E. Slater, Alvin Goldman, Matthew W. Finkin, Lea VanderVelde, Stephen F. Befort, Joseph R. Grodin, Paul M. Secunda, Richard A. Bales, Roberto L. Corrada, Catherine L. Fisk, Pauline T. Kim and Michael J. Zimmer; responses by Alan Hyde and Rachel Arnow-Richmen. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 1-207 (2009).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal.)

LAND USE PLANNING

Cremer, Jacob T. Tractors versus bulldozers: integrating growth management and ecosystem services to conserve agriculture. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10541-10554 (2009). Perkins, Nancy D. Principled preemption in an age of interest convergence: preserving the distinction between Pennsylvania’s environmental regulation and local land use regulation. 47 Duq. L. Rev. 27-87 (2009).

Wilson, Linley S. Comment. Lessons from Oregon: Arizona’s approach to land use regulation. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 505-530 (2009).

LAW AND SOCIETY

(For other articles on LAW AND SOCIETY see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for DePaul Journal for Social Justice, Law & Society Review and National Black Law Journal.) Johnson, Jeffrey L. Privacy, authenticity, & equality: the moral and legal case for the right to homosexual marriage. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 21-40 (2008). Riegelman, Claire. Environmentalism: a symbiotic relationship between a social movement and U.S. law? 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 522-550 (2009). van der Vyver, Jonan D. The binding force of economic and social rights listed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 125-173 (2008). Symposium. The Most Disparaged Branch: The Role of Congress in the Twenty-First Century. Foreword by Jill Hamers and Bret A. Finkelstein; keynote address by Jeremy Waldron; articles by David R. Mayhew, Kenneth A. Shepsle, Barbara Sinclair, Gary Lawson, Sanford Levinson, Vlad Perju, Ann Seidman, Robert B. Seidman, Alan L. Feld, Mark Tushnet, Jeffrey K. Tulis, Michael J. Gerhardt, Lani Guinier, Linda C. McClain, Stephen Macedo, James E. Fleming, Jane S. Schacter, Sotirios A. Barber, Nancy Rosenblum, Jack M. Beermann, Douglas Kriner, Kim Lane Scheppele, Graham K. Wilson, John Uhr and Michael E. Libonati; responses by Hugh Baxter, Gerald N. Rosenberg, Robert Post, Frederick C. Harris and Adrian Vermeule. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 331-870 (2009).


LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CORRECTIONS

Bergman, Hannah H. Comment. The CIA’s public operational files: accessing files exempt from the CIA Information Act of 1984 because of investigations into illegal or improper activity. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 99-128 (2008). Binnall, James M. Respecting beasts: the dehumanizing quality of the modern prison and an unusual model for penal reform. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 161-190 (2008). 2008 Caleb Foote Symposium Issue: Prison Reform in California. Articles by Erwin Chemerinsky and Michael P. Jacobsen. 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 307-326 (2008).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law.)


July 3, 2009

LAW OF THE SEA

(For articles on LAW OF THE SEA see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Ocean Development and International Law.)

LEGAL ANALYSIS AND WRITING

Labor Law Group--U.C. Hastings Symposium on the Proposed Restatement of Employment Law. Introduction by Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt; articles by Reuel Schiller, Dennis R. Nolan, Theodore J. St. Antoine, Joseph E. Slater, Alvin Goldman, Matthew W. Finkin, Lea VanderVelde, Stephen F. Befort, Joseph R. Grodin, Paul M. Secunda, Richard A. Bales, Roberto L. Corrada, Catherine L. Fisk, Pauline T. Kim and Michael J. Zimmer; responses by Alan Hyde and Rachel Arnow-Richmen. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 1-207 (2009).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal.)

LEGAL HISTORY

Sundahl, Mark J. The living Constitution of ancient Athens: a comparative perspective on the originalism debate. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 463-504 (2009).

LEGAL PROFESSION

Lash, Karen A. Pitching pro bono: getting to first base with the “big firm”. 2 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. 141-172 (2008). Marx, Sarah L. Comment. Seen but not heard: advocating for children in New York State. 25 Touro L. Rev. 491-539 (2009). An Obvious Truth: Creating an Action Blueprint for a Civil Right to Counsel in New York State. Introductions by Andrew Scherer and Lawrence Raful; remarks by Kathryn Grant Madigan, Bernice K. Leber and Laura K. Abel; keynote address by Wade Henderson; panel participation with Andrew Sherer, moderator, Martha F. Davis, Debra Gardner, Rosie Mendez, Hon. Juanita Bing Newton, Adriene Holder and Laura Klein Abel, panelists; articles by Paul Marvy, Laura Klein Abel, Martha F. Davis, Raymond H. Brescia, Stephen Loffredo, Don Friedman, Dennis A. Kaufman and Kia C. Franklin. 25 Touro L. Rev. 1-489 (2009).


LEGISLATION

Arcila, Fabio, Jr. The Framers’ search power: the misunderstood statutory history of suspicion & probable cause. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 363-426 (2009). Byrnes, Erin M. Case comment. (Cohen v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., 498 F.3d 111, 2007.) 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 673-684 (2008/09).

Colbert, R. Caleb. Note. No, you can’t: the Ninth Circuit says “no” to change. (Natural Resources Defense Council v. Environmental Protection Agency, 526 F.3d 591, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 574-593 (2009). McCormack, Shannon Weeks. Tax shelters and statutory interpretation: a much needed purposive approach. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 687-772.

MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE

Bruce, Courtenay R. Comment. The awful stranger, consciousness: a proposed analytical framework for minimally conscious state cases. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 185-211 (2008). Burns, Kimberly A. and Alan R. Spies. A pharmacist’s duty to warn: promoting the acceptance of a consistent legal and professional standard. 47 Duq. L. Rev. 1-26 (2009). Chamberlain, Katherine A. Note. Looking for a “good death”: the elderly terminally ill’s right to die by physician-assisted suicide. 17 Elder L.J. 61-93 (2009). Hohenstein, Andrew D. Comment. Team physicians: adhering to the Hippocratic Oath or just plain hypocrites? 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 579-612 (2009). MacIsaac, Kristen. Note. Medicare’s August Rule: necessary step toward minimizing federal spending or overboard decision leading to higher malpractice costs? 50 B.C. L. Rev. 533-560 (2009).

MILITARY, WAR AND PEACE

Bush, Jonathan A. The prehistory of corporations and conspiracy in international criminal law: what Nuremberg really said. 109 Colum. L. Rev. 1094-1262 (2009). Colb, Sherry F. Why is torture “different” and how “different” is it? 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1411-1473 (2009). Kurland, Abigail. Comment. The extraterritorial reach of the Great Writ at common law: the constitution guarantees the Guantanamo Bay detainees a right to habeas corpus. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 67-97 (2008). Macdonald, Stuart. Why we should abandon the balance metaphor: a new approach to counterterrorism policy. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 95-146 (2008). Priester, Benjamin J. Who is a “terrorist”? Drawing the line between criminal defendants and military enemies. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1255-1337. Sheehy, Benedict and Jackson N. Maogoto. The private military company--unravelling the theoretical, legal & regulatory mosaic. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 147-181 (2008).


July 3, 2009

Thornburg, James. Recent decision. Aliens detained at Guantanamo Bay have a constitutional right to file habeas corpus petitions in federal court. (Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229, 2008.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 179-200 (2009). 2008 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition Distinguished Briefs. Winning briefs by Ateneo de Manila University and University of Ottawa Common Law Section. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 227-314 (2008).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law.)

MOTOR VEHICLES

Atwood, Denise A. Comment. Riding helmetless: personal freedom or societal burden? 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 269-293 (2008).

NATURAL RESOURCES LAW

Bateman, Sam and Michael White. Compulsory pilotage in the Torres Straight: overcoming unacceptable risks to a sensitive marine environment. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 184-203 (2009). Bauerle, Keith G. The Ninth Circuit’s “clarifications” in Lands Council v. McNair: much ado about nothing? 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 203-254 (2009). Pradas-Monné, Alicia. Comment. A knot in the line: sea turtle bycatch reduction problems in the United States Atlantic pelagic longline fishery. 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 273-299 (2009). Tanaka, Yoshifumi. Reflections on reporting systems in treaties concerning protection of the marine environment. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 146-170 (2009).

ORGANIZATIONS

Benjamin, Jeremy. Note. Reinvigorating nonprofit directors’ duty of obedience. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1677-1708 (2009).

PARTNERSHIPS

Hellwig, Brant J. On discounted partnership interests and adequate consideration. 28 Va. Tax Rev. 531-618 (2009). Kahn, Douglas A. The proper tax treatment of the transfer of a compensatory partnership interest. 62 Tax Law. 1-58 (2008).

POLITICS

Elliot-Meisel, Elizabeth. Politics, pride, and precedent: the United States and Canada in the Northwest Passage. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 204-232 (2009). Kasper, Michael J. Where are your papers? Photo identification as a prerequisite to voting. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 1-19 (2008). Leff, Benjamin M. “Sit down and count the cost”: a framework for constitutionally enforcing the 501(c)(3) campaign intervention ban. 28 Va. Tax Rev. 673-731 (2009).

Symposium. The Most Disparaged Branch: The Role of Congress in the Twenty-First Century. Foreword by Jill Hamers and Bret A. Finkelstein; keynote address by Jeremy Waldron; articles by David R. Mayhew, Kenneth A. Shepsle, Barbara Sinclair, Gary Lawson, Sanford Levinson, Vlad Perju, Ann Seidman, Robert B. Seidman, Alan L. Feld, Mark Tushnet, Jeffrey K. Tulis, Michael J. Gerhardt, Lani Guinier, Linda C. McClain, Stephen Macedo, James E. Fleming, Jane S. Schacter, Sotirios A. Barber, Nancy Rosenblum, Jack M. Beermann, Douglas Kriner, Kim Lane Scheppele, Graham K. Wilson, John Uhr and Michael E. Libonati; responses by Hugh Baxter, Gerald N. Rosenberg, Robert Post, Frederick C. Harris and Adrian Vermeule. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 331-870 (2009).


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Black, Kathy. Comment. Trashing the presumption: intervention on the side of government. 39 Envtl. L. 481-505 (2009). Closen, Michael L. and Charles N. Faerber. The case that there is a common law duty of notaries public to create and preserve detailed journal records of their official acts. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 231-461 (2009). Hooper, Chester D. Forum selection and arbitration in the draft Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, or the definition of fora conveniens set forth in the Rotterdam Rules. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 417-426 (2009). Markel, Asa William. International litigation in Arizona: litigating foreign country judgments in Arizona. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 117-145 (2008). An Obvious Truth: Creating an Action Blueprint for a Civil Right to Counsel in New York State. Introductions by Andrew Scherer and Lawrence Raful; remarks by Kathryn Grant Madigan, Bernice K. Leber and Laura K. Abel; keynote address by Wade Henderson; panel participation with Andrew Sherer, moderator, Martha F. Davis, Debra Gardner, Rosie Mendez, Hon. Juanita Bing Newton, Adriene Holder and Laura Klein Abel, panelists; articles by Paul Marvy, Laura Klein Abel, Martha F. Davis, Raymond H. Brescia, Stephen Loffredo, Don Friedman, Dennis A. Kaufman and Kia C. Franklin. 25 Touro L. Rev. 1-489 (2009).


PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT

Raysman, Richard and Peter Brown. Technology initiatives in the new administration. 18 Media L. & Pol’y 95-104 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Tyler, David W. Note. Clarifying departmentalism: how the Framers’ vision of judicial and presidential review makes the case for deductive judicial supremacy. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2215-2264 (2009).

PRODUCTS LIABILITY

Tipps, Peter. Note. Controlling the lead paint debate: why control is not an element of public nuisance. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 605-638 (2009).

PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

Lee, Rachel C. Note. Ex parte blogging: the legal ethics of Supreme Court advocacy in the Internet era. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1535-1571 (2009).

PROPERTY--PERSONAL AND REAL

Alger, Clay. Comment. Use interrupted: the complicated evolution of Utah’s highway dedication doctrine. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1613-1644. Brescia, Raymond H. Sheltering counsel: towards a right to a lawyer in eviction proceedings. 25 Touro L. Rev. 187-271 (2009). Echeverria, John D. Making sense of Penn Central. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10471-10486 (2009). Ellis, Benjamin M. Note. Protecting the right to marital property: ensuring a full equitable distribution award with fraudulent conveyance law. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1709-1743 (2009). McLaughlin, Nancy A. and Mark Benjamin Machlis. Protecting the public interest and investment in conservation: a response to Professor Korngold’s critique of conservation easements. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1561-1594. Miller, Ken. Using letters of credit, credit default swaps and other forms of credit enhancements in net lease transactions. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 45-80 (2009). Rohr, Jonathan. Note. Assessing the scope of Williamson County: why it should be applied to private purpose claims. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1809-1842 (2009). Woodyard, William and Glenn Boggs. Public outcry: Kelo v. City of New London--a proposed solution. 39 Envtl. L. 431-450 (2009).

PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

Barger, Judith M. Avoiding Atkins v. Virginia: how states are circumventing both the letter and the spirit of the Court’s mandate. 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 215-237 (2008). Echard, Trent. Comment. Clark v. Arizona: has the Court painted itself into a corner? (Clark v. Arizona, 126 S. Ct. 2709, 2006.) 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 213-267 (2008).

Janda, Ami C. Student article. Keeping a productive labor market: crafting recognition and rights for mentally ill workers. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 403-445 (2008). Mayer, Ashley P. Secure detention: the plight of juveniles in Florida who are incompetent to stand trial. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 239-280 (2009). Rhein, Jennifer L. Note. No one in charge: durable powers of attorney and the failure to protect incapacitated principals. 17 Elder L.J. 165-199 (2009).

RELIGION

Ellinghausen, Don Jr. “In standing is the preservation of his world”: Justice Scalia and the varieties of natural-religious experience. 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 474-520 (2009). Greenawalt, Kent. The rule of law and the exemption strategy. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1513-1534 (2009). Koppelman, Andrew. Corruption of religion and the Establishment Clause. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1831-1935 (2009). Morriss, Andrew P. and Benjamin D. Cramer. Disestablishing environmentalism. 39 Envtl. L. 309-396 (2009).

REMEDIES

Auerbach, Shira. Note. Screening out cyberbullies: remedies for victims on the Internet playground. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1641-1675 (2009). Berg, Stephanie. Remedying the statutory damages remedy for secondary copyright infringement liability: balancing copyright and innovation in the digital age. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 265-334 (2009). Burnett, Christina Duffy. A convenient Constitution? Extraterritoriality after Boumediene. 109 Colum. L. Rev. 973-1046 (2009). Kaplan, Connie. No end in sight: the effect of the Boumediene decision on detainees held by the United States at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 183-201 (2008). Kurland, Abigail. Comment. The extraterritorial reach of the Great Writ at common law: the constitution guarantees the Guantanamo Bay detainees a right to habeas corpus. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 67-97 (2008). Noce, Robert. Note. If a regulation falls in the courts, and nobody’s there to hear it ... The limited impact of Northwest Environmental Advocates v. EPA on federal ballast water policy. (Northwest Environmental Advocates v. EPA, 537 F.3d 1006, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 594-611 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Tait, Matthew. Note. A remedy even the plaintiffs don’t like. The D.C. Circuit’s vacatur of the Clean Air Interstate Rule. (North Carolina v. E.P.A., 531 F.3d, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 552-572 (2009). Thornburg, James. Recent decision. Aliens detained at Guantanamo Bay have a constitutional right to file habeas corpus petitions in federal court. (Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229, 2008.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 179-200 (2009). Wilson, Mark W. Comment. Why private remedies for environmental torts under the Alien Tort Statute should not be constrained by the judicially created doctrines of jus cogens and exhaustion. 39 Envtl. L. 451-479 (2009).

RETIREMENT SECURITY

Bonnett, Nancy Williams. Native American retirement plans: the law in the aftermath of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 147-158 (2008). Occhuizzo, Nicole. Taxing tenure: an examination of how the Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) has been applied to tenure buyouts. 62 Tax Law. 189-222 (2008).

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Beecher-Monas, Erica. Reality bites: the illusion of science in bite-mark evidence. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1369-1410 (2009). Raysman, Richard and Peter Brown. Technology initiatives in the new administration. 18 Media L. & Pol’y 95-104 (2009).

SECURITIES LAW

Brown, J. Robert, Jr. The SEC, corporate governance and shareholder access to the board room. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1339-1393. Crawford, Blake H. Eliminating the executive overcompensation problem: how the SEC and Congress have failed and why the shareholders can prevail. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 273-318 (2009). Eisenberg, Theodore and Geoffrey P. Miller. The flight to New York: an empirical study of choice of law and choice of forum clauses in publicly-held companies’ contracts. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1475-1512 (2009). Gilbert, Evan M. Unnecessary reform: the fallacies with and alternatives to SEC regulation of hedge funds. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 319-348 (2009). Johnsen, D. Bruce. The SEC’s 2006 Soft Dollar Guidance: law and economics. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1545-1613 (2009). Lawhead, Alan. Useful limits to the Fifth Amendment: examining the benefits that flow from a private regulator’s ability to demand answers to its questions during an investigation. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 210-283.

Macchiarola, Michael C. Get Shorty: toward resurrecting the SEC’s ill-fated pursuit of pipe arbitrageurs. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 1-43 (2009). Martin, Erin E. Note. The intersection between finance and intellectual property: trade secrets, hedge funds, and Section 13(f) of the Exchange Act. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 575-597 (2008/09). Miller, Robert T. The economics of deal risk: allocating risk through MAC clauses in business combination agreements. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2007-2103 (2009). Pieczonka, Michael R. Comment. The largest loophole in federal tax law: preferential capital gain treatment for private equity and hedge fund managers’ carried interests. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 529-559 (2009). Rubin, Gary. CFTC Regulation 1.59 fails to adequately regulate insider trading. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 599-624 (2008/09).

SEXUALITY AND THE LAW

Frumkin, Jacob. Comment. Perennial punishment? Why the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act needs reconsideration. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 313-358 (2008). Greenblatt, Jennifer L. Using the Equal Protection Clause post-VMI to keep gender stereotypes out of the public school dress code equation. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 281-297 (2009). Hovey, Jaime E. Note. Nursing wounds: why LGBT elders need protection from discrimination and abuse based on sexual orientation and gender identity. 17 Elder L.J. 95-123 (2009). Johnson, Jeffrey L. Privacy, authenticity, & equality: the moral and legal case for the right to homosexual marriage. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 21-40 (2008). Kebric, Angela. Comment. Polygraph testing in sex offender treatment: a constitutional and essential tool for effective treatment. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 429-452 (2009). Schleppenbach, John R. Strange bedfellows: why older straight couples should advocate for the passage of the Illinois Civil Union Act. 17 Elder L.J. 31-59 (2009).

SOCIAL WELFARE

Greene, Matthew H. The HOPE VI paradox: why do HUD’s most successful housing developments fail to benefit the poorest of the poor? 17 J.L. & Pol’y 191-229 (2008). MacIsaac, Kristen. Note. Medicare’s August Rule: necessary step toward minimizing federal spending or overboard decision leading to higher malpractice costs? 50 B.C. L. Rev. 533-560 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Loffredo, Stephen and Don Friedman. Gideon meets Goldberg: the case for a qualified right to counsel in welfare hearings. 25 Touro L. Rev. 273-346 (2009). Petersburg, Benjamin. Student article. Reconciling the McKinney-Vento Act with the vision of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: improving local educational agency liaisons’ ability to serve America’s homeless children. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 447-484 (2008).

SPORTS

(For other articles on SPORTS see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Marquette Sports Law Review.) Holo, Robert and Jonathan Talansky. Taxing the business of sports. 9 Fla. Tax Rev. 161-214 (2008).

STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAW

Halpin, Michael W. Note. Is the living wage dead in Detroit? The role of stare decisis, home rule, and policy preferences in the Michigan Supreme Court. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 911-945. The Corporation Counsel: Reflections on the New York City Law Department. Introduction by Ross Sandler; articles by Edward I. Koch, Frederick A. O. Schwartz, Jr., Peter L. Zimroth, Hon. O. Peter Sherwood, Hon. Paul A. Crotty, Michael A. Cardozo, Jeffrey D. Friedlander, Gail Rubin, Leonard Koerner, William E. Nelson, Ross Sandler and William P. LaPiana. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 365-573 (2008/09).

(For contents see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for New York Law School Law Review.)

TAXATION--FEDERAL INCOME

(For other articles on TAXATION--FEDERAL INCOME see the Tables of Contents of Indexed Law Reviews for Florida Tax Review, Tax Lawyer and Virginia Tax Review.) McCormack, Shannon Weeks. Tax shelters and statutory interpretation: a much needed purposive approach. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 687-772. Pieczonka, Michael R. Comment. The largest loophole in federal tax law: preferential capital gain treatment for private equity and hedge fund managers’ carried interests. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 529-559 (2009). Pogroszewski, Alan. When is a CPA as important as your ERA? A comprehensive evaluation and examination of state tax issues on professional athletes. 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 395-417 (2009).

TAXATION--STATE AND LOCAL

Aughenbaugh, Gregory V. Recent decision. Differential taxation of interest derived from out-of-state municipal bonds does not violate the dormant Commerce Clause. (Department of Revenue v. Davis, 128 S. Ct. 1801, 2008.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 201-219 (2009).

TAXATION--TRANSNATIONAL

Benshalom, Ilan. Taxing the financial income of multinational enterprises by employing a hybrid formulary and arm’s length allocation method. 28 Va. Tax Rev. 619-671 (2009).

TORTS

Closen, Michael L. and Charles N. Faerber. The case that there is a common law duty of notaries public to create and preserve detailed journal records of their official acts. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 231-461 (2009). Lewis, Erik P. Note. Unmasking “Anon12345”: applying an appropriate standard when private citizens seek the identity of anonymous Internet defamation defendants. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 947-973. Smith, Douglas G. An administrative approach to the resolution of mass torts? (Reviewing Richard A. Nagareda, Mass Torts in a World of Settlement.) 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 895-909.

TRADE REGULATION

Devlin, Alan and Michael Jacobs. Microsoft’s five fatal flaws. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 67-108. Lambert, Thomas A. Dr. Miles is dead. Now what?: structuring a rule of reason for evaluating minimum resale price maintenance. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1937-2005 (2009). McKeown, James T. 2008 antitrust developments in professional sports: to the single entity and beyond. 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 363-393 (2009).

TRANSPORTATION LAW

Thornton, Dorothy, Robert A. Kagan and Neil Gunningham. When social norms and pressures are not enough: environmental performance in the trucking industry. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 405-435 (2009). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea (“Rotterdam Rules”). 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 479-520 (2009). Transport Law for the 21st Century: The New UNCITRAL Convention. Articles by Mary Helen Carlson, Jose Angelo Estrella Faria, Johan Schelin, Alexander von Ziegler, Tomotaka Fujita, Gertjan van der Ziel, Manuel Alba, Chester D. Hooper and Michael F. Sturley. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 269-455 (2009).



July 3, 2009

WATER LAW

Noce, Robert. Note. If a regulation falls in the courts, and nobody’s there to hear it ... The limited impact of Northwest Environmental Advocates v. EPA on federal ballast water policy. (Northwest Environmental Advocates v. EPA, 537 F.3d 1006, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 594-611 (2009).

WOMEN

Williams, Susan H. Feminist theory and freedom of speech. 84 Ind. L.J. 999-1013 (2009). Symposium: The “Partial-Birth Abortion” Ban: Health Care in the Shadow of Criminal Liability. Articles by Talcott Camp, Caitlin E. Borgmann, David D. Meyer and Priscilla J. Smith. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 1-160 (2008).


TABLES OF CONTENTS OF INDEXED LAW REVIEWS

71 ALBANY LAW REVIEW, NO. 4, PP. 1041-1315, 2008.

Bonventre, Vincent Martin. Editor’s foreword. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1041-1044 (2008). Symposium: Judges on Judges: The New State Court of Appeals Judges’ Own Favorites in Court History. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1045-1090 (2008).

Bonventre, Vincent Martin. Introduction. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1045-1049 (2008). Rosenblatt, Judge Albert M. Introduction. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1051-1053 (2008). Kaye, Chief Judge Judith S. Chief Judge Lawrence H. Cooke. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1055-1059 (2008). Ciparick, Judge Carmen Beauchamp. Judge Vito J. Titone. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1061-1064 (2008). Graffeo, Judge Victoria A. Judge Francis Bergan. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1065-1069 (2008). Read, Judge Susan Phillips. Chief Judge John T. Loughran. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1071-1074 (2008). Smith, Judge Robert S. Chief Judge Cuthbert Pound. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1075-1079 (2008). Pigott, Judge Eugene F., Jr. Judge Matthew J. Jasen. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1081-1086 (2008). Jones, Judge Theodore T., Jr. Judge Harold A. Stevens. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1087-1090 (2008).

Friedelbaum, Stanley H. Educational issues and judicial oversight. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1091-1127 (2008). Sullivan, Diane M., Holly Vietzke and Michael L. Coyne. A modest proposal for advancing animal rights. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1129-1136 (2008). Eddy, Gordon. Court study. The development of independent New York constitutional jurisprudence in Chief Judge Kaye’s judicial opinions: an empirical study. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1137-1161 (2008). Sabourin, Nathan. Court study. We’re from Vermont and we do what we want: a “re”-examination of the criminal jurisprudence of the Vermont Supreme Court. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1163-1211 (2008). Blackwell, Kevin. Comment. State constitutional adjudication in a footnote? A critique of the Supreme Court of Louisiana’s decision in ... (State v. Kennedy, 957 So. 2d 757, 2007.) 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1213-1240 (2008). McGuinness, Martin. Comment. The “silver platter” in the context of state constitutional adjudication. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1241-1254 (2008). Breitenbach, Katherine G. Note. Battling the threat: the successful prosecution of domestic violence after ... . (Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 2006.) 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1255-1286 (2008). Eddy, Gordon. Comment. Throwing stones from within a glass house: why the procedural approach to confrontation fails to remedy the ills of the indicia of reliability test, and an argument for a balanced rule. 71 Alb. L. Rev. 1287-1315 (2008).

41 ARIZONA STATE LAW JOURNAL,

NO. 2, SUMMER, 2009.

Coughenour, Amy M. Comment. Appraisal and the property insurance appraisal clause--a critical analysis: guidance and recommendations for Arizona. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 403-427 (2009). Kebric, Angela. Comment. Polygraph testing in sex offender treatment: a constitutional and essential tool for effective treatment. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 429-452 (2009). Mumford, Bradley N. Comment. Make it mean something: the case for broader protection from cruel and unusual punishment under the Arizona Constitution. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 453-481 (2009). Pappas, Katherine L. Comment. Can an equal protection claim pass the test when educational financing is challenged?: a case for the rational basis standard. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 483-503 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Wilson, Linley S. Comment. Lessons from Oregon: Arizona’s approach to land use regulation. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 505-530 (2009). A discussion of the Arizona Supreme Court’s 2007-2008 decisions. Edited by student Samuel J. Doncaster. 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 533-643 (2009).

13 BERKELEY JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW,

NO. 2, FALL, 2008.

Adler, Alexis Rose, et al. Editors’ note. 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L. unpaged (2008). Barger, Judith M. Avoiding Atkins v. Virginia: how states are circumventing both the letter and the spirit of the Court’s mandate. 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 215-237 (2008). Adelman, Hon. Lynn and Jon Deitrich. Marvin Frankel’s mistakes and the need to rethink federal sentencing. 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 239-260 (2008). Kim, Janine Young. The rhetoric of self defense. 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 261-305 (2008). 2008 Caleb Foote Symposium Issue: Prison Reform in California. 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 307-326 (2008).

Chemerinsky, Erwin. The essential but inherently limited role of the courts in prison reform. 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 307-317 (2008). Jacobsen, Michael P. Crisis and opportunity in California’s prison system. 13 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 319-326 (2008).

50 BOSTON COLLEGE LAW REVIEW, NO. 2, MARCH, 2009.

Robinson, Kimberly Jenkins. The constitutional future of race-neutral efforts to achieve diversity and avoid racial isolation in elementary and secondary schools. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 277-362 (2009). Arcila, Fabio, Jr. The Framers’ search power: the misunderstood statutory history of suspicion & probable cause. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 363-426 (2009). Livingston, Margit. Inspiration or imitation: copyright protection for stage directions. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 427-487 (2009). Stein, Mark S. Nussbaum: a utilitarian critique. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 489-531 (2009). MacIsaac, Kristen. Note. Medicare’s August Rule: necessary step toward minimizing federal spending or overboard decision leading to higher malpractice costs? 50 B.C. L. Rev. 533-560 (2009). Tabor, Jacob. Note. Students’ First Amendment rights in the age of the Internet: off-campus cyberspeech and school regulation. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 561-604 (2009).

Tipps, Peter. Note. Controlling the lead paint debate: why control is not an element of public nuisance. 50 B.C. L. Rev. 605-638 (2009).

89 BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW,

NO. 2, APRIL, 2009.

Symposium. The Most Disparaged Branch: The Role of Congress in the Twenty-First Century. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 331-870 (2009).

Hamers, Jill and Bret A. Finkelstein. Editors’ foreword. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 331-334 (2009). Waldron, Jeremy. Representative lawmaking. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 335-355 (2009).

Panel I: Is Congress “The Broken Branch” Mayhew, David R. Is Congress “the broken branch”? 89 B.U. L. Rev. 357-369 (2009). Shepsle, Kenneth A. Dysfunctional Congress? 89 B.U. L. Rev. 371-386 (2009). Sinclair, Barbara. Question: what’s wrong with Congress? Answer: it’s a democratic legislature. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 387-397 (2009). Lawson, Gary. The Constitution’s Congress. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 399-407 (2009). Levinson, Sanford. Still complacent after all these years: some rumination on the continuing need for a “new political science” (not to mention a new way of teaching law students about what is truly most important about the Constitution). 89 B.U. L. Rev. 409-422 (2009).

Panel II: Is Legislation an Unprincipled, Incoherent, Undignified Mess?

Editors’ note on “legisprudence”. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 423-425 (2009). Perju, Vlad. A comment on “legisprudence”. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 427-434 (2009). Seidman, Ann and Robert B. Seidman. ILTAM: drafting evidence-based legislation for democratic social change. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 435-485 (2009). Feld, Alan L. The shrunken power of the purse. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 487-498 (2009).

Panel III: Is Congress Capable of Conscientious, Responsible Constitutional Interpretation?

Tushnet, Mark. Some notes on congressional capacity to interpret the Constitution. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 499-509 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Baxter, Hugh. A comment on Mark Tushnet’s Some notes on congressional capacity to interpret the Constitution. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 511-514 (2009). Tulis, Jeffrey K. On Congress and constitutional responsibility. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 515-524 (2009). Gerhardt, Michael J. Judging Congress. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 525-538 (2009).

Panel IV: Beyond Legislatures: Social Movements, Social Change, and the Possibilities of Demosprudence

Guinier, Lani. Courting the people: demosprudence and the law/politics divide. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 539-561 (2009). Rosenberg, Gerald N. Romancing the court. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 563-579 (2009). Post, Robert. Law professors and political scientists: observations on the law/politics distinction in the Guinier/Rosenberg debate. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 581-587 (2009). McClain, Linda C. Supreme Court justices, empathy, and social change: a comment on Demosprudence through dissent. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 589-604 (2009). Harris, Frederick C. Specifying the mechanism linking dissent to action. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 605-608 (2009).

Panel V: Toward a More Democratic Congress? Macedo, Stephen. Our imperfect democratic Constitution: the critics examined. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 609-628 (2009). Fleming, James E. Toward a more democratic Congress? 89 B.U. L. Rev. 629-640 (2009). Schacter, Jane S. Digitally democratizing Congress? Technology and political accountability. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 641-675 (2009). Vermeule, Adrian. Congress and the costs of information: a response to Jane Schacter. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 677-687 (2009).

Panel VI: Toward a More Responsible Congress? Barber, Sotirios A. Congress and responsible government. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 689-713 (2009). Rosenblum, Nancy. Responsible Congress and political time. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 715-725 (2009). Beermann, Jack M. The turn toward Congress in administrative law. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 727-763 (2009). Kriner, Douglas. Can enhanced oversight repair “the broken branch”? 89 B.U. L. Rev. 765-793 (2009).

Panel VII: Congress in Comparative Perspective Scheppele, Kim Lane. Parliamentary supplements (or why democracies need more than Parliaments). 89 B.U. L. Rev. 795-826 (2009). Wilson, Graham K. Congress in comparative perspective. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 827-845 (2009). Uhr, John. Comparing Congress: Bryce on deliberation and decline in legislatures. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 847-862 (2009). Libonati, Michael E. State constitutions and legislative process: the road not taken. 89 B.U. L. Rev. 863-870 (2009).

30 CARDOZO LAW REVIEW, NO. 4, MARCH, 2009.

Beecher-Monas, Erica. Reality bites: the illusion of science in bite-mark evidence. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1369-1410 (2009). Colb, Sherry F. Why is torture “different” and how “different” is it? 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1411-1473 (2009). Eisenberg, Theodore and Geoffrey P. Miller. The flight to New York: an empirical study of choice of law and choice of forum clauses in publicly-held companies’ contracts. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1475-1512 (2009). Greenawalt, Kent. The rule of law and the exemption strategy. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1513-1534 (2009). Hamilton, Marci A. A response to Professor Greenawalt. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1535-1543 (2009). Johnsen, D. Bruce. The SEC’s 2006 Soft Dollar Guidance: law and economics. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1545-1613 (2009). Weissenberger, Glen. The proper interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence: insights from Article VI. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1615-1639 (2009). Auerbach, Shira. Note. Screening out cyberbullies: remedies for victims on the Internet playground. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1641-1675 (2009). Benjamin, Jeremy. Note. Reinvigorating nonprofit directors’ duty of obedience. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1677-1708 (2009). Ellis, Benjamin M. Note. Protecting the right to marital property: ensuring a full equitable distribution award with fraudulent conveyance law. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1709-1743 (2009). Harris, Keith. Note. For promotional use only: is the resale of a promotional CD protected by the first sale doctrine? 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1745-1772 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Maida, Lauren. Note. Patent claim construction: it’s not a pure matter of law, so why isn’t the Federal Circuit giving the district courts the deference they deserve? 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1773-1807 (2009). Rohr, Jonathan. Note. Assessing the scope of Williamson County: why it should be applied to private purpose claims. 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1809-1842 (2009).

2009 COLUMBIA BUSINESS LAW REVIEW,

NO. 1, PP. 1-356.

Alter, Denise M. Corporate art collecting and fiduciary duties to shareholders: legal duties and best practices for directors and officers. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 1-66. Devlin, Alan and Michael Jacobs. Microsoft’s five fatal flaws. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 67-108. Hunt, John P. Credit rating agencies and the “worldwide credit crisis”: the limits of reputation, the insufficiency of reform, and a proposal for improvement. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 109-209. Lawhead, Alan. Useful limits to the Fifth Amendment: examining the benefits that flow from a private regulator’s ability to demand answers to its questions during an investigation. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 210-283. Giblin, Thomas J. Note. Financial markets in bankruptcy court: how much uncertainty remains after BAPCPA? 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 284-325. Moody, Gerald M., Jr. Note. Writing is reading is writing: two applications of the parole evidence rule to collective bargaining agreements. 2009 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 326-356.

109 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW,

NO. 5, JUNE, 2009.

Ball, W. David. Heinous, atrocious, and cruel: Apprendi, indeterminate sentencing, and the meaning of punishment. 109 Colum. L. Rev. 893-972 (2009). Burnett, Christina Duffy. A convenient Constitution? Extraterritoriality after Boumediene. 109 Colum. L. Rev. 973-1046 (2009). Cabin, Michael A. Note. Labor rights in the Peru Agreement: can vague principles yield concrete change? 109 Colum. L. Rev. 1047-1093 (2009). Bush, Jonathan A. The prehistory of corporations and conspiracy in international criminal law: what Nuremberg really said. 109 Colum. L. Rev. 1094-1262 (2009).

2 DEPAUL JOURNAL FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, NO. 1, FALL, 2008.

Rivera, Rose. Letter to our readers: introduction to the Postville Raids Symposium. 2 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. ix-x (2008). Postville Raids Symposium. 2 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. 1-140 (2008).

Camayd-Freixas, Erik. Raids, rights and reform: the Postville case and the immigration crisis. 2 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. 1-24 (2008). Cole, Rockne. Letter from Rockne Cole, criminal defense attorney to Zoe Lofgren, Congresswoman. 2 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. 25-30 (2008). Albiol, Sioban, R. Linus Chan and Sarah J. Diaz. Re-interpreting Postville: a legal perspective. 2 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. 31-99 (2008). Martinez, Virginia, Jazmin Garcia and Jasmine Vasquez. A community under siege: the impact of anti-immigrant hysteria on Latinos. 2 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. 101-140 (2008).

Lash, Karen A. Pitching pro bono: getting to first base with the “big firm”. 2 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. 141-172 (2008).

47 DUQUESNE LAW REVIEW, NO. 1, WINTER, 2009.

Burns, Kimberly A. and Alan R. Spies. A pharmacist’s duty to warn: promoting the acceptance of a consistent legal and professional standard. 47 Duq. L. Rev. 1-26 (2009). Perkins, Nancy D. Principled preemption in an age of interest convergence: preserving the distinction between Pennsylvania’s environmental regulation and local land use regulation. 47 Duq. L. Rev. 27-87 (2009). Ryznar, Margaret. Two to tango, one in limbo: a comparative analysis of fathers’ rights in infant adoptions. 47 Duq. L. Rev. 89-114 (2009). Murrer, Christopher G. Comment. A call for uniform application of the Americans with Disabilities Act: does Title II support a claim for employment discrimination? 47 Duq. L. Rev. 115-131 (2009). Snyder, Jennifer. Comment. The decision in American Council of the Blind v. Paulson: the Department of Treasury violated the Rehabilitation Act by failing to issue currency that was readily distinguishable by the visually impaired. (Am. Council of the Blind v. Paulson, 525 F.3d 1256, 2008.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 133-148 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Duan, Liu. Recent decision. Broadband Internet access service transmitted via wireless (digital subscriber line, DSL) is an information service and thus is not subject to the Title II regulation of the Communications Act, and telephone companies are not required to afford non-facility-based independent Internet service providers with nondiscriminatory access to the companies’ wireline facilities. (Time Warner Telecom, Inc. v. FCC, 507 F.3d 205, 2007.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 149-178 (2009). Thornburg, James. Recent decision. Aliens detained at Guantanamo Bay have a constitutional right to file habeas corpus petitions in federal court. (Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229, 2008.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 179-200 (2009). Aughenbaugh, Gregory V. Recent decision. Differential taxation of interest derived from out-of-state municipal bonds does not violate the dormant Commerce Clause. (Department of Revenue v. Davis, 128 S. Ct. 1801, 2008.) 47 Duq. L. Rev. 201-219 (2009).

17 ELDER LAW JOURNAL,

NO. 1, PP. 1-199, 2009.

Martin, Nathalie. Consumer scams and the elderly: preserving independence through shifting default rules. 17 Elder L.J. 1-30 (2009). Schleppenbach, John R. Strange bedfellows: why older straight couples should advocate for the passage of the Illinois Civil Union Act. 17 Elder L.J. 31-59 (2009). Chamberlain, Katherine A. Note. Looking for a “good death”: the elderly terminally ill’s right to die by physician-assisted suicide. 17 Elder L.J. 61-93 (2009). Hovey, Jaime E. Note. Nursing wounds: why LGBT elders need protection from discrimination and abuse based on sexual orientation and gender identity. 17 Elder L.J. 95-123 (2009). Paulsen, Jeffrey Kimball. Note. Credit card disclosures and the elderly: will the proposed amendments to Regulation Z help the elderly understand credit card documents? 17 Elder L.J. 125-163 (2009). Rhein, Jennifer L. Note. No one in charge: durable powers of attorney and the failure to protect incapacitated principals. 17 Elder L.J. 165-199 (2009).

13 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS AND EMPLOYMENT POLICY

JOURNAL, NO. 1, PP. 1-251, 2009.

Labor Law Group--U.C. Hastings Symposium on the Proposed Restatement of Employment Law. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 1-207 (2009).

Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth G. A conference on the American Law Institute’s Proposed Restatement of Employment Law. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 1-38 (2009).

Schiller, Reuel. “It is not wisdom, but authority that makes a law:” a historical perspective on the problem of creating a Restatement of Employment Law. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 39-42 (2009). Nolan, Dennis R., Theodore J. St. Antoine, Joseph E. Slater and Alvin Goldman. Working Group on Chapter 1 of the Proposed Restatement of Employment Law: existence of employment relationship. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 43-86 (2009). Hyde, Alan. Response to Working Group on Chapter 1 of the Proposed Restatement of Employment Law: on purposeless restatement. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 87-92 (2009). Finkin, Matthew W., Lea VanderVelde, William Corbett and Stephen F. Befort. Working Group on Chapter 2 of the Proposed Restatement of Employment Law: employment contracts: termination. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 93-142 (2009). Arnow-Richman, Rachel. Response to Working Group on Chapter 2 of the Proposed Restatement of Employment Law: putting the restatement in its place. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 143-157 (2009). Grodin, Joseph R., Paul M. Secunda, Richard A. Bales, Roberto L. Corrada, Catherine L. Fisk and Pauline T. Kim. Working Group on Chapter 4 of the Proposed Restatement of Employment Law: the tort of wrongful discipline in violation of public policy. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 159-203 (2009). Zimmer, Michael J. The Restatement of Employment Law is the wrong project. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 205-207 (2009).

Roan, Tyson B. Anything but doomed: why restrictions on offshoring are permissible under the Constitution and trade agreements. 13 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J. 209-251 (2009).

39 ENVIRONMENTAL LAW,

NO. 2, SPRING, 2009.

Schroeder, Christopher H. Global warming and the problem of policy innovation: lessons from the early environmental movement. 39 Envtl. L. 285-307 (2009). Morriss, Andrew P. and Benjamin D. Cramer. Disestablishing environmentalism. 39 Envtl. L. 309-396 (2009). Fisher, Kristina G. The Rhino in the Colonia: how Colonias Development Council v. Rhino Environmental Services, Inc. set a substantive state standard for environmental justice. 39 Envtl. L. 397-430 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Woodyard, William and Glenn Boggs. Public outcry: Kelo v. City of New London--a proposed solution. 39 Envtl. L. 431-450 (2009). Wilson, Mark W. Comment. Why private remedies for environmental torts under the Alien Tort Statute should not be constrained by the judicially created doctrines of jus cogens and exhaustion. 39 Envtl. L. 451-479 (2009). Black, Kathy. Comment. Trashing the presumption: intervention on the side of government. 39 Envtl. L. 481-505 (2009).

39 ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REPORTER NEWS &

ANALYSIS, NO. 6, JUNE, 2009.

Beyond words. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10455(2009). Miller, Kenneth. Penn Central for tomorrow: making regulatory takings predictable. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10457-10470 (2009). Echeverria, John D. Making sense of Penn Central. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10471-10486 (2009). Rugendorf, David S. Putting the green in green card: an immigration policy for an ailing economy and a sustainable planet. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10487-10492 (2009). Eubanks, William S. II. The sustainable Farm Bill: a proposal for permanent environmental change. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10493-10509 (2009). You, Mingqing. Annual review of Chinese environmental law developments: 2008. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10510-10515 (2009). Potapov, Alex. Making regulatory takings reform work: the lessons of Oregon’s Measure 37. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10516-10540 (2009). Cremer, Jacob T. Tractors versus bulldozers: integrating growth management and ecosystem services to conserve agriculture. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10541-10554 (2009). Recent developments. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10555-10569 (2009). Recent journal literature. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10570-10572 (2009). Topical index. 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10573-10574 (2009).

3 FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, NO. 1, SPRING, 2008.

Hogan, Regina S. Editor’s note. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. unpaged (2008). Kasper, Michael J. Where are your papers? Photo identification as a prerequisite to voting. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 1-19 (2008). Johnson, Jeffrey L. Privacy, authenticity, & equality: the moral and legal case for the right to homosexual marriage. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 21-40 (2008). Bennett, Heather P. Comment. “Pick”ering the speech rights of public school teachers: arguing for a movement by courts toward the Hazelwood-Tinker standard under the First Amendment. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 41-65 (2008). Kurland, Abigail. Comment. The extraterritorial reach of the Great Writ at common law: the constitution guarantees the Guantanamo Bay detainees a right to habeas corpus. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 67-97 (2008). Bergman, Hannah H. Comment. The CIA’s public operational files: accessing files exempt from the CIA Information Act of 1984 because of investigations into illegal or improper activity. 3 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 99-128 (2008).

9 FLORIDA TAX REVIEW,

NO. 3, PP; 161-214, 2008.

Holo, Robert and Jonathan Talansky. Taxing the business of sports. 9 Fla. Tax Rev. 161-214 (2008).

2 GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY ENVIRONMENTAL LAW JOURNAL, NO. 2, SPRING, 2009.

Wimert, Ethan and Laura Koch. In this edition. 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 201-202 (2009). Bauerle, Keith G. The Ninth Circuit’s “clarifications” in Lands Council v. McNair: much ado about nothing? 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 203-254 (2009). Brisman, Avi and Alison Rau. From fear of crime to fear of nature: the problem with permitting loaded, concealed firearms in national parks. 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 255-272 (2009). Pradas-Monné, Alicia. Comment. A knot in the line: sea turtle bycatch reduction problems in the United States Atlantic pelagic longline fishery. 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 273-299 (2009).


July 3, 2009

30 HAMLINE JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW AND POLICY, NO. 1, FALL, 2008.

Spring 2008 Symposium: The 60th Anniversary of the Declaration of Human Rights: A Reality Check. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 1-401 (2008).

van Aggelen, Johannes. Implementation of Article 28 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the U.N. conferences in the 1990s. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 1-32 (2008). McBeth, Adam. Every organ of society: the responsibility of non-state actors for the realization of human rights. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 33-88 (2008). Brennan, Fernne. Race rights reparations: exploring a reparations framework for addressing trade inequality. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 89-123 (2008). van der Vyver, Jonan D. The binding force of economic and social rights listed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 125-173 (2008). Haynes, Dina Francesca. Ethics of international civil service: a reflection on how the care of United Nations’ staff impacts the ability to fulfill their role in “harmonizing” the world. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 175-222 (2008). Sims, John Cary. The asymmetrical nature of the U.S. treaty processes and the challenges that poses for human rights. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 223-244 (2008). Gonzales Marcos, Miguel. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and constitutional adjudication: challenges to cosmopolitan law. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 245-283 (2008). Gibson, Johanna. The UDHR and the group: individual and community rights to culture. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 285-317 (2008). Carter, William M., Jr. Rethinking subsidiarity in international human rights adjudication. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 319-333 (2008). Udombana, Nsongurua. Mission accomplished? An impact assessment of the UDHR in Africa. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 335-385 (2008). Wedll, Don. The United National Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and its relevance to American Indians in Minnesota and beyond. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 387-401 (2008).

Janda, Ami C. Student article. Keeping a productive labor market: crafting recognition and rights for mentally ill workers. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 403-445 (2008).

Petersburg, Benjamin. Student article. Reconciling the McKinney-Vento Act with the vision of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: improving local educational agency liaisons’ ability to serve America’s homeless children. 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 447-484 (2008).

15 ILSA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND

COMPARATIVE LAW, NO. 1, FALL, 2008.

Rodriguez, Jamie A. Baron. Editor’s note. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. vii-viii (2008). Mintz, Joel A. Introductory note: a perspective on Pakistan’s Chief Justice, judicial independence, and the rule of law. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 1-6 (2008). Hassan, Tariq. The need for judicial activism acceptance speech. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 7-14 (2008). Blodgett, Mark S., Richard J. Hunter, Jr. and Hector R. Lozada. A primer on international environmental law and custom. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 15-31 (2008). Engle, Eric. Beyond sovereignty? The state after the failure of sovereignty. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 33-47 (2008). Barrioneuvo Arévalo, Luis. The multiplication of international jurisdictions and the integrity of international law. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 49-60 (2008). Klimas, Tadas and Jūratė Vaičiukaitė. The law of recitals in European Community legislation. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 61-93 (2008). Macdonald, Stuart. Why we should abandon the balance metaphor: a new approach to counterterrorism policy. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 95-146 (2008). Sheehy, Benedict and Jackson N. Maogoto. The private military company--unravelling the theoretical, legal & regulatory mosaic. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 147-181 (2008). Kaplan, Connie. No end in sight: the effect of the Boumediene decision on detainees held by the United States at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 183-201 (2008). de Lima Mantilla, Yuri. The survival of the United States ethanol subsidies and tariff: are there further reasons to keep them on the books? 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 203-225 (2008). 2008 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition Distinguished Briefs. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 227-314 (2008).

Ateneo de Manila University. Memorial for Applicant. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 227-272 (2008).


July 3, 2009

University of Ottawa Common Law Section. Memorial for Respondent. 15 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 273-314 (2008).

84 INDIANA LAW JOURNAL, NO. 3, SUMMER, 2009.

Peresie, Jennifer L. Toward a coherent test for disparate impact discrimination. 84 Ind. L.J. 773-802 (2009). Symposium: An Ocean Apart? Freedom of Expression in Europe and the United States. 84 Ind. L.J. 803-1046 (2009).

Zoller, Elisabeth. Foreword: freedom of expression: “precious right” in Europe, “sacred right” in the United States? 84 Ind. L.J. 803-808 (2009). Flauss, Jean-François. The European Court of Human Rights and the freedom of expression. 84 Ind. L.J. 809-849 (2009). Barendt, Eric. Freedom of expression in the United Kingdom under the Human Rights Act of 1998. 84 Ind. L.J. 851-866 (2009). Jouanjan, Olivier. Freedom of expression in the Federal Republic of Germany. 84 Ind. L.J. 867-883 (2009). Zoller, Elisabeth. The United States Supreme Court and the freedom of expression. 84 Ind. L.J. 885-916 (2009). Farber, Daniel A. The categorical approach to protecting speech in American constitutional law. 84 Ind. L.J. 917-938 (2009). Stone, Geoffrey R. Free speech and national security. 84 Ind. L.J. 939-962 (2009). Bell, Jeannine. Restraining the heartless: racist speech and minority rights. 84 Ind. L.J. 963-979 (2009). Baker, C. Edwin. The First Amendment and commercial speech. 84 Ind. L.J. 981-998 (2009). Williams, Susan H. Feminist theory and freedom of speech. 84 Ind. L.J. 999-1013 (2009). Morvan, Patrick. A comparison of the freedom of speech of workers in France and American law. 84 Ind. L.J. 1015-1046 (2009).

42 JOHN MARSHALL LAW REVIEW, NO. 2, WINTER, 2009.

Editorial Board 2008-2009 Dedication of issue to Chief Justice Thomas R. Fitzgerald. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. xxiii (2009).

Closen, Michael L. and Charles N. Faerber. The case that there is a common law duty of notaries public to create and preserve detailed journal records of their official acts. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 231-461 (2009). Sundahl, Mark J. The living Constitution of ancient Athens: a comparative perspective on the originalism debate. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 463-504 (2009). Caifano, Catherine R. Comment. When the music stops, why not require certain Title VII plaintiffs to find a chair on which to rest their complaint? 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 505-528 (2009). Pieczonka, Michael R. Comment. The largest loophole in federal tax law: preferential capital gain treatment for private equity and hedge fund managers’ carried interests. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 529-559 (2009). Sharifi, Ghazal. Comment. Is the door open or closed? Evaluating the future of the federal medical peer-review privilege. 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 561-593 (2009).

2 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, ENTREPRENEURSHIP

& THE LAW, NO. 2, PP. 273-494, 2009.

Crawford, Blake H. Eliminating the executive overcompensation problem: how the SEC and Congress have failed and why the shareholders can prevail. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 273-318 (2009). Gilbert, Evan M. Unnecessary reform: the fallacies with and alternatives to SEC regulation of hedge funds. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 319-348 (2009). Kiryabwire, Geoffrey. The development of the commercial judicial system in Uganda: a study of the Commercial Court Division, High Court of Uganda. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 349-358 (2009). Fahy, Garrett M. Student article. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007): faithful to Title VII or blind to sex discrimination? 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 359-393 (2009). Davis, Ian. Student article. Rural banking: designing an effective framework for microfinance. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 394-423 (2009). Sommers, Caroline. Student article. There is no perfect solution to health care in America. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 424-458 (2009). Cooper, Michael B. Case note. Class-less? An analysis of the California Supreme Court’s denial of employers’ right to use class arbitration waivers in employment agreements in Gentry v. Superior Court. 2 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 459-493 (2009).


July 3, 2009

17 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY, NO. 1, PP. 1-402, 2008.

Symposium: The “Partial-Birth Abortion” Ban: Health Care in the Shadow of Criminal Liability. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 1-160 (2008).

Camp, Talcott. The “Partial-Birth Abortion” Ban: Health Care in the Shadow of Criminal Liability, panel II, the path ahead: legal challenges and responses. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 1-14 (2008). Borgmann, Caitlin E. Judicial evasion and disingenuous legislative appeals to science in the abortion controversy. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 15-56 (2008). Meyer, David D. Gonzales v. Carhart and the hazards of muddles scrutiny. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 57-96 (2008). Smith, Priscilla J. Responsibility for life: how abortion serves women’s interests in motherhood. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 97-160 (2008).

Binnall, James M. Respecting beasts: the dehumanizing quality of the modern prison and an unusual model for penal reform. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 161-190 (2008). Greene, Matthew H. The HOPE VI paradox: why do HUD’s most successful housing developments fail to benefit the poorest of the poor? 17 J.L. & Pol’y 191-229 (2008). Collins, Justin. Note. Without other options: the limited effectiveness, unique availability, and overall impact of state-directed lawsuits against predatory lenders. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 231-269 (2008). Edelman, Gabriel. Comment. The New York City trans fat ban: a healthy law. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 271-311 (2008). Frumkin, Jacob. Comment. Perennial punishment? Why the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act needs reconsideration. 17 J.L. & Pol’y 313-358 (2008). Schaeffer, Maritza. Note. Contemporary issues in the visual art realm: how useful are Creative Commons licenses? 17 J.L. & Pol’y 359-402 (2008).

56 JOURNAL OF THE COPYRIGHT SOCIETY OF THE

U.S.A., NO. 2, WINTER-SPRING, 2009.

From the desk of the Co-Editors-in-Chief. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. i-iv (2009). Alnajafi, Nada. Protecting the past in the future: how copyright is wrong for Egypt and why other sui generis laws may help protect the Pyramids and other cultural antiquities. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 243-263 (2009). Berg, Stephanie. Remedying the statutory damages remedy for secondary copyright infringement liability: balancing copyright and innovation in the digital age. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 265-334 (2009).

Brauneis, Robert. Copyright and the world’s most popular song. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 335-426 (2009). Cronin, Charles. Genius in a bottle: perfume, copyright, and human perception. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 427-483 (2009). Hick, Darren Hudson. Mystery and misdirection: some problems of fair use and users’ rights. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 485-504 (2009). McNamara, Joseph E. Modifying the Design Piracy Prohibition Act to offer “opt-out” protection for fashion designs. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 505-541 (2009). Monlux, Nicholas R. An invitation for infringement: how the Ninth Circuit’s extrinsic and intrinsic similarity tests encourage infringement: an analysis using Reece v. Island Treasures Art Gallery. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 543-569 (2009). Naser, M.A. and W.H. Muhaisen. Intellectual property: an Islamic perspective. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 571-587 (2009). Peguera, Miquel. When the cached link is the weakest link: search engine caches under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 589-645 (2009). Walker, Adam. Thumbnails, search engines, and copyrights: a whole mess of confusion. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 647-667 (2009). Wan, Yong. Legal protection of performers’ rights in the Chinese Copyright Law. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 669-694 (2009). Liang, Zhiwen. Beyond the Copyright Act: the fair use doctrine under Chinese judicial opinions. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 695-717 (2009). Legislative and administrative developments. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 719-720 (2009). Bibliography. 56 J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A. 721-729 (2009).

43 LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW,

NO. 2-3, JUNE, 2009.

Tankebe, Justice. Self-help, policing, and procedural justice: Ghanaian vigilantism and the rule of law. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 245-269 (2009). Holzmeyer, Cheryl. Human rights in an era of neoliberal globalization: the Alien Tort Claims Act and grassroots mobilization in Day v. Unocal. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 271-304 (2009). Tezcür, Güneş Murat. Judicial activism in perilous times: the Turkish case. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 305-336 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Dunn, Kerry and Paul J. Kaplan. The ironies of helping: social interventions and executable subjects. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 337-368 (2009). Ng, Kwai Hang. “If I lie, I tell you, may heaven and earth destroy me.” Language and legal consequences in Hong Kong bilingual common law. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 369-403 (2009). Thornton, Dorothy, Robert A. Kagan and Neil Gunningham. When social norms and pressures are not enough: environmental performance in the trucking industry. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 405-435 (2009). Book reviews. 43 Law & Soc’y Rev. 437-454 (2009).

19 MARQUETTE SPORTS LAW REVIEW,


McKeown, James T. 2008 antitrust developments in professional sports: to the single entity and beyond. 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 363-393 (2009). Pogroszewski, Alan. When is a CPA as important as your ERA? A comprehensive evaluation and examination of state tax issues on professional athletes. 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 395-417 (2009). Bilsky, Daniel. From parts unknown: WWE v. Jim Hellwig in the ultimate battle for character copyright. 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 419-436 (2009). Wild, Kaitlyn Anne. 2008 annual survey: recent developments in sports law. 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 437-578 (2009). Hohenstein, Andrew D. Comment. Team physicians: adhering to the Hippocratic Oath or just plain hypocrites? 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 579-612 (2009). Bidlack, Christopher. Comment. The prohibition of prosthetic limbs in American sports: the issues and the role of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 613-637 (2009). Hartley, Brian C. Student work. Sports law in law reviews and journals. 19 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 639-643 (2009).

18 MEDIA LAW & POLICY,

NO. 2, PP. 95-187, 2009.

Raysman, Richard and Peter Brown. Technology initiatives in the new administration. 18 Media L. & Pol’y 95-104 (2009). Pearce, Alan and Michael S. Pagano. Accelerated wireless broadband infrastructure deployment: the impact on GDP and employment. 18 Media L. & Pol’y 105-127 (2009). Manner, Jennifer A. Telecommunications in a dearth of capital: a changed paradigm that requires a new way of thinking. 18 Media L. & Pol’y 129-138 (2009).

Adamski, Dariusz. Broadband stimulus policy in Europe ant the US: a comparative review. 18 Media L. & Pol’y 139-157 (2009). Brogan, Patrick S. The economic benefits of broadband and information technology. 18 Media L. & Pol’y 159-187 (2009).

16 MISSOURI ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY

REVIEW, NO. 2, SPRING, 2009.

Maland, Brett M. Editor’s perspective. 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. unpaged (2009). Morriss, Andrew P., et al. Green jobs myths. 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 326-473 (2009). Ellinghausen, Don Jr. “In standing is the preservation of his world”: Justice Scalia and the varieties of natural-religious experience. 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 474-520 (2009). Riegelman, Claire. Environmentalism: a symbiotic relationship between a social movement and U.S. law? 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 522-550 (2009). Tait, Matthew. Note. A remedy even the plaintiffs don’t like. The D.C. Circuit’s vacatur of the Clean Air Interstate Rule. (North Carolina v. E.P.A., 531 F.3d, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 552-572 (2009). Colbert, R. Caleb. Note. No, you can’t: the Ninth Circuit says “no” to change. (Natural Resources Defense Council v. Environmental Protection Agency, 526 F.3d 591, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 574-593 (2009). Noce, Robert. Note. If a regulation falls in the courts, and nobody’s there to hear it ... The limited impact of Northwest Environmental Advocates v. EPA on federal ballast water policy. (Northwest Environmental Advocates v. EPA, 537 F.3d 1006, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 594-611 (2009). Seele, Erin P. Note. The door finally opens to challenge agency decisions thet affect the environment. (Board of County Commissioners of Sumner County v. Bremby, 189 P.3d 494, 2008.) 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 612-630 (2009). Environmental law updates. 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 632-649 (2009).

21 NATIONAL BLACK LAW JOURNAL,

NO. 1, PP. 1-80, 2009.

Bridges, Barbara J. Editor’s note. 21 Nat’l Black L.J. vii-viii (2009). Zehrt, Lynn Ridgeway. A decade later: Adarand and Croson and the status of minority preferences in government contracting. 21 Nat’l Black L.J. 1-26 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Wolf, Robert V. Race, bias, and problem-solving courts. 21 Nat’l Black L.J. 27-52 (2009). LeGrand, Andrew. Note. Narrowing the tailoring: how Parents Involved limits the use of race in higher education admissions. 21 Nat’l Black L.J. 53-80 (2009).

53 NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL LAW REVIEW,

NO. 3, PP. 361-686, 2008/09.

The Corporation Counsel: Reflections on the New York City Law Department. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 365-573 (2008/09).

Sandler, Ross. Introduction. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 365-367 (2008/09). Koch, Edward I. Reflections on the New York City Law Department. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 369-373 (2008/09). Schwartz, Frederick A. O., Jr. Lawyers for government have unique responsibilities and opportunities to influence public policy. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 375-407 (2008/09). Zimroth, Peter L. Reflections on my years as Corporation Counsel. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 409-426 (2008/09). Sherwood, Hon. O. Peter. Implementing a new City Charter: thoughts on my tenure as Corporation Counsel in a time of transition. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 429-436 (2008/09). Crotty, Hon. Paul A. The Giuliani years: Corporation Counsel 1994-1997. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 439-456 (2008/09). Cardozo, Michael A. The New York City Corporation Counsel: the best legal job in America. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 459-476 (2008/09). Friedlander, Jeffrey D. The independence of the Law Department. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 479-488 (2008/09). Rubin, Gail. Taking the offensive: New York City’s affirmative suits. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 491-506 (2008/09). Koerner, Leonard. Institutional reform litigation. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 509-516 (2008/09). Crotty, Hon. Paul A. A response: why William Nelson’s analysis of the Law Department 1946-1965 is wrong. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 519-530 (2008/09). Nelson, William E. Defending the historian’s art: a response to Paul A. Crotty’s attack on Fighting for the City. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 533-538 (2008/09). Sandler, Ross. The history of the New York City Law Department: Fighting for the City by William E. Nelson. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 541-559 (2008/09).

LaPiana, William P. Fighting for the City in context: William Nelson and the legal history of New York. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 561-573 (2008/09).

Martin, Erin E. Note. The intersection between finance and intellectual property: trade secrets, hedge funds, and Section 13(f) of the Exchange Act. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 575-597 (2008/09). Rubin, Gary. CFTC Regulation 1.59 fails to adequately regulate insider trading. 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 599-624 (2008/09). Daggan, Clinton N. Case comment. (Chi Iota Colony of Alpha Epsilon Pi Franternity v. City Univ. of N.Y., 502 F.3d 136, 2007.) 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 627-637 (2008/09). Schlusselberg, Adam. Case comment. In re Davis. (Davis v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp., 373 B.R. 241, 2007.) 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 639-652 (2008/09). Ruotolo, Lyndsay V. Case comment. (United States v. Grier, 475 F.3d 556, 2007.) 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 655-671 (2008/09). Byrnes, Erin M. Case comment. (Cohen v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., 498 F.3d 111, 2007.) 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 673-684 (2008/09).

40 OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL

LAW, NO. 2, APRIL-JUNE, 2009.

Kunoy, Bjørn. The 10 year time frame to disputed areas. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 131-145 (2009). Tanaka, Yoshifumi. Reflections on reporting systems in treaties concerning protection of the marine environment. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 146-170 (2009). Koivurova, Timo. A note on the European Union’s Integrated Maritime Policy. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 171-183 (2009). Bateman, Sam and Michael White. Compulsory pilotage in the Torres Straight: overcoming unacceptable risks to a sensitive marine environment. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 184-203 (2009). Elliot-Meisel, Elizabeth. Politics, pride, and precedent: the United States and Canada in the Northwest Passage. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 204-232 (2009). Ho, Joshua H. Enhancing safety, security, and environmental protection of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore: the cooperative mechanism. 40 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 233-247 (2009).


July 3, 2009

9 PEPPERDINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION LAW JOURNAL, NO. 3, PP. 437-582, 2009.

Abramson, Harold. Outward bound to other cultures: seven guidelines for U.S. dispute resolution trainers. 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 437-455 (2009). Erbe, Nancy, et al. Negotiating and mediating peace. 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 457-494 (2009). Hallevy, Gabriel. The defense attorney as mediator in plea bargains. 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 495-525 (2009). Zadeh, Mariam. The missing link: enhancing mediation success using neuro-linguistic programming. 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 527-554 (2009). Kucinski, Melissa A. Culture in international parental kidnapping mediations. 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 555-582 (2009).

1 PHOENIX LAW REVIEW,


McGregor, Justice Ruth V. [Congratulations.] 1 Phoenix L. Rev. unpaged (2008). Shields, Dennis S. Dedication. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. unpaged (2008). Moberly, Michael D. Judicial protection of forum selection: enforcing private agreements to litigate in state court. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 1-58 (2008). Gerst, Hon. Stephen A. Comparative proportionality analysis: its feasibility and usefulness in sentencing. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 59-115 (2008). Markel, Asa William. International litigation in Arizona: litigating foreign country judgments in Arizona. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 117-145 (2008). Bonnett, Nancy Williams. Native American retirement plans: the law in the aftermath of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 147-158 (2008). Burguan, Jessica J. Comment. Disregarding diversity. (Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, No. 1, 127 S. Ct. 2738, 2007.) 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 159-183 (2008). Bruce, Courtenay R. Comment. The awful stranger, consciousness: a proposed analytical framework for minimally conscious state cases. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 185-211 (2008). Echard, Trent. Comment. Clark v. Arizona: has the Court painted itself into a corner? (Clark v. Arizona, 126 S. Ct. 2709, 2006.) 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 213-267 (2008). Atwood, Denise A. Comment. Riding helmetless: personal freedom or societal burden? 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 269-293 (2008).

Lalezari, Babak. Comment. Domestic violence: enough is enough, any force is enough. 1 Phoenix L. Rev. 295-319 (2008).

61 STANFORD LAW REVIEW,

NO. 6, APRIL, 2009.

Symposium. Media, Justice, and the Law. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1333-1533 (2009).

Oats, Jessica. Introduction. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1333-1334 (2009). Cole, Simon A. and Rachel Dioso-Villa. Investigating the ‘CSI effect:’ media and litigation crisis in criminal law. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1335-1373 (2009). Covey, Russell D. Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1375-1427 (2009). Montross, William R., Jr. and Patrick Mulvaney. Virtue and vice: who will report on the failings of the American criminal justice system. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1429-1461 (2009). Robinson, Russell K. Racing the closet. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1463-1533 (2009).

Lee, Rachel C. Note. Ex parte blogging: the legal ethics of Supreme Court advocacy in the Internet era. 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1535-1571 (2009).

62 TAX LAWYER, NO. 1, FALL, 2008.

Kahn, Douglas A. The proper tax treatment of the transfer of a compensatory partnership interest. 62 Tax Law. 1-58 (2008). Burke, Karen C. and Grayson M.P. McCouch. COBRA strikes back: anatomy of a tax shelter. 62 Tax Law. 59-92 (2008). Elkins, David and Christopher H. Hanna. Taxation of supernormal returns. 62 Tax Law. 93-116 (2008). Brown, Fred B. Determining the character of section 357(c) gain. 62 Tax Law. 117-173 (2008). Gesiko, Agnes. The protection of taxpayer’s federal tax return information in the Internet Age--is tax return information being afforded proper confidentiality and privacy protections? 62 Tax Law. 175-187 (2008). Occhuizzo, Nicole. Taxing tenure: an examination of how the Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) has been applied to tenure buyouts. 62 Tax Law. 189-222 (2008).


July 3, 2009

Zotos, Nick A. Service collection abuse of discretion: what is the appropriate standard of review and scope of the record in collection due process appeals? 62 Tax Law. 223-239 (2008). Livingston, Christopher W. Comment. Finding the right balance: a critical analysis of the major proposals to reform the taxation of carried interests in private equity. 62 Tax Law. 241-258 (2008). Chouest, Hanna M. Note. Dot all the ‘I’s and cross all the ‘T’s: Estate of Tamulis v. Commissioner and the narrowing of the substantial compliance doctrine to the technical compliance doctrine. (Estate of Tamulis v. Commissioner, 509 F.3d 343, 2007.) 62 Tax Law. 259-277 (2008). Levine, Max J. Note. The Tucker Act and tax refund suits: sovereign immunity at play in ... (United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co., 128 S. Ct. 1511, 2008.) 62 Tax Law. 279-295 (2008). Wille, Robert J. Note. The amount of trading that makes a “trade or business” in ... (Cameron V. Commissioner, 94 T.C.M. (CCH) 245, 2007.) 62 Tax Law. 297-309 (2008).

44 TEXAS INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL,


Transport Law for the 21st Century: The New UNCITRAL Convention. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 269-455 (2009).

Carlson, Mary Helen. U.S. participation in private international law negotiations: why the UNCITRAL Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea is important to the United States. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 269-276 (2009). Estrella Faria, Jose Angelo. Uniform law for international transport at UNCITRAL: new times, new players, and new rules. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 277-319 (2009). Schelin, Johan. The UNCITRAL Convention on Carriage of Goods by Sea: harmonization or de-harmonization. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 321-327 (2009). von Ziegler, Alexander. The liability of the contracting carrier. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 329-348 (2009). Fujita, Tomotaka. The comprehensive coverage of the new Convention: performing parties and the multimodal implications. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 349-373 (2009). van der Ziel, Gertjan. Chapter 10 of the Rotterdam Rules: control of goods in transit. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 375-386 (2009). Alba, Manuel. Electronic commerce provisions in the UNCITRAL Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 387-416 (2009).

Hooper, Chester D. Forum selection and arbitration in the draft Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, or the definition of fora conveniens set forth in the Rotterdam Rules. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 417-426 (2009). Sturley, Michael F. Modernizing and reforming U.S. maritime law: the impact of the Rotterdam Rules in the United States. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 427-455 (2009).

Schoenbaum, Lauren Jensen. Comment. The Okinawa dugong and the creative application of U.S. extraterritorial environmental law. 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 457-478 (2009). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea (“Rotterdam Rules”). 44 Tex. Int’l L.J. 479-520 (2009).

25 TOURO LAW REVIEW,

NO. 1, PP. 1-539, 2009.

An Obvious Truth: Creating an Action Blueprint for a Civil Right to Counsel in New York State. 25 Touro L. Rev. 1-489 (2009).

Scherer, Andrew. Introduction. 25 Touro L. Rev. 1-4 (2009). Raful, Lawrence. Dean’s message. 25 Touro L. Rev. 5-7 (2009). Madigan, Kathryn Grant. Advocating for a civil right to counsel in New York State. 25 Touro L. Rev. 9-21 (2009). Leber, Bernice K. The time for civil Gideon is now. 25 Touro L. Rev. 23-30 (2009). Abel, Laura K. Toward a right to counsel in civil cases in New York State: a report of the New York State Bar Association. 25 Touro L. Rev. 31-72 (2009). Henderson, Wade. Keynote address: the evolution and importance of creating a civil right to counsel. 25 Touro L. Rev. 71-80 (2009). Panel Discussion: International, National, and Local Perspectives on Civil Right to Counsel.

Scherer, Andrew. Introduction. 25 Touro L. Rev. 82-83 (2009). Davis, Martha F. The international perspective. 25 Touro L. Rev. 83-91 (2009). Gardner, Debra. The national perspective. 25 Touro L. Rev. 91-98 (2009). Mendez, Rosie. The New York City and senior citizen perspective. 25 Touro L. Rev. 99-104 (2009).


July 3, 2009

Newton, Hon. Juanita Bing. The judicial perspective. 25 Touro L. Rev. 104-112 (2009). Holder, Adriene. The Legal Aid prospective. 25 Touro L. Rev. 113-122 (2009). Abel, Laura Klein. Lessons learned. 25 Touro L. Rev. 122-129 (2009).

Marvy, Paul and Laura Klein Abel. Current developments in advocacy to expand the civil right to counsel. 25 Touro L. Rev. 131-146 (2009). Davis, Martha F. In the interests of justice: human rights and the right to counsel in civil cases. 25 Touro L. Rev. 147-185 (2009). Brescia, Raymond H. Sheltering counsel: towards a right to a lawyer in eviction proceedings. 25 Touro L. Rev. 187-271 (2009). Loffredo, Stephen and Don Friedman. Gideon meets Goldberg: the case for a qualified right to counsel in welfare hearings. 25 Touro L. Rev. 273-346 (2009). Kaufman, Dennis A. The tipping point on the scales of civil justice. 25 Touro L. Rev. 347-436 (2009). Franklin, Kia C. Advocacy in health proceedings in New York State. 25 Touro L. Rev. 437-465 (2009). Colloquy. Special populations: mobilization for change. 25 Touro L. Rev. 467-489 (2009).

Marx, Sarah L. Comment. Seen but not heard: advocating for children in New York State. 25 Touro L. Rev. 491-539 (2009).

13 UC DAVIS JOURNAL OF JUVENILE LAW & POLICY,

NO. 2, SUMMER, 2009.

Gower, Robert Richard. Editor’s note. v-vi 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y v-vi (2009). Mayer, Ashley P. Secure detention: the plight of juveniles in Florida who are incompetent to stand trial. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 239-280 (2009). Greenblatt, Jennifer L. Using the Equal Protection Clause post-VMI to keep gender stereotypes out of the public school dress code equation. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 281-297 (2009). Oluwole, Joseph O. The genesis of gangrenes in the student free speech taxonomy. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 299-331 (2009). Zirkel, Perry A, and Youssef Chouhoud. The Goss progeny: a follow-up outcomes analysis. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 333-348 (2009).

Vanderbeek, Christopher D. Case note. Oh, brother! A California appeals court reaffirms the denial of necessary access for separated children to build and maintain sibling relationships In re Miguel A. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 349-381 (2009). Children’s section. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 383-400 (2009). Recent court decisions and legislation impacting juveniles. 13 UC Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y 401-427 (2009).

2009 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW,

NO. 3, PP. 627-1010.

Huigens, Kyron. The continuity of justification defenses. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 627-695. McCormack, Shannon Weeks. Tax shelters and statutory interpretation: a much needed purposive approach. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 687-772. McKenna, Mark P. Trademark use and the problem of source. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 773-828. Rana, Shruti. “Streamlining” the rule of law: how the Department of Justice is undermining judicial review of agency action. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 829-893. Smith, Douglas G. An administrative approach to the resolution of mass torts? (Reviewing Richard A. Nagareda, Mass Torts in a World of Settlement.) 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 895-909. Halpin, Michael W. Note. Is the living wage dead in Detroit? The role of stare decisis, home rule, and policy preferences in the Michigan Supreme Court. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 911-945. Lewis, Erik P. Note. Unmasking “Anon12345”: applying an appropriate standard when private citizens seek the identity of anonymous Internet defamation defendants. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 947-973. O’Brien, Katherine M. Note. No match? No thanks: how the Department of Homeland Security’s no-match rule puts the jobs of legal immigrants in jeopardy. 2009 U. Ill. L. Rev. 975-1009.

2008 UTAH LAW REVIEW,

NO. 4, PP. 1255-1644.

Priester, Benjamin J. Who is a “terrorist”? Drawing the line between criminal defendants and military enemies. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1255-1337. Brown, J. Robert, Jr. The SEC, corporate governance and shareholder access to the board room. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1339-1393.


July 3, 2009

Azar, Deborah. A method to protect computer programs: the integration of copyright, trade secrets, and anticircumvention measures. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1395-1431. Tene, Omer. What Google knows: privacy and Internet search engines. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1433-1492. Schmidt, Christopher W. “Freedom comes only from the law”: the debate over law’s capacity and the making of Brown v. Board of Education. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1493-1559. McLaughlin, Nancy A. and Mark Benjamin Machlis. Protecting the public interest and investment in conservation: a response to Professor Korngold’s critique of conservation easements. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1561-1594. Winzeler, Zack L. Comment. Whoa, whoa, whoa...one at a time: examining the responses to the Illinois study on double-blind sequential lineup procedures. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1595-1612. Alger, Clay. Comment. Use interrupted: the complicated evolution of Utah’s highway dedication doctrine. 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1613-1644.

4 VIRGINIA LAW & BUSINESS REVIEW,


Macchiarola, Michael C. Get Shorty: toward resurrecting the SEC’s ill-fated pursuit of pipe arbitrageurs. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 1-43 (2009). Miller, Ken. Using letters of credit, credit default swaps and other forms of credit enhancements in net lease transactions. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 45-80 (2009). Estreicher, Samuel. “Think global, act local”: employee representation in a world of global labor and product market competition. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 81-95 (2009). Reed, Brendan J. Note. Sovereign wealth funds: the new barbarians at the gate? An analysis of the legal and business implications of their ascendancy. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 97-138 (2009). Turgeon, Evan N. Note. Boom and bust for whom?: the economic philosophy behind the 2008 financial crisis. 4 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 141-186 (2009).

28 VIRGINIA TAX REVIEW,

NO. 3, WINTER, 2009.

Johnson, Calvin H. Taxing the consumption of capital gains. 28 Va. Tax Rev. 477-529 (2009). Hellwig, Brant J. On discounted partnership interests and adequate consideration. 28 Va. Tax Rev. 531-618 (2009).

Benshalom, Ilan. Taxing the financial income of multinational enterprises by employing a hybrid formulary and arm’s length allocation method. 28 Va. Tax Rev. 619-671 (2009). Leff, Benjamin M. “Sit down and count the cost”: a framework for constitutionally enforcing the 501(c)(3) campaign intervention ban. 28 Va. Tax Rev. 673-731 (2009). Chung, Steven. Note. Real taxation of virtual commerce. 28 Va. Tax Rev. 733-778 (2009).

50 WILLIAM AND MARY LAW REVIEW,

NO. 6, MAY, 2009.

Koppelman, Andrew. Corruption of religion and the Establishment Clause. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1831-1935 (2009). Lambert, Thomas A. Dr. Miles is dead. Now what?: structuring a rule of reason for evaluating minimum resale price maintenance. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1937-2005 (2009). Miller, Robert T. The economics of deal risk: allocating risk through MAC clauses in business combination agreements. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2007-2103 (2009). Tokson, Matthew J. The content/envelope distinction in Internet law. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2105-2176 (2009). Garrett, Aaron C. Note. New theories of guilt on appeal in Virginia criminal cases. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2177-2214 (2009). Tyler, David W. Note. Clarifying departmentalism: how the Framers’ vision of judicial and presidential review makes the case for deductive judicial supremacy. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2215-2264 (2009). Index to vol. 50. 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2264-2284 (2009).

CURRENT INDEX TO LEGAL PERIODICALS INDEX TO LEGAL PERIODICALS ... Golden Gate University...

Documents

Transcript of CURRENT INDEX TO LEGAL PERIODICALS INDEX TO LEGAL PERIODICALS ... Golden Gate University...