CULTURE AND HEALTH - UGM

3
CULTURE AND HEALTH Culture is both a product of human behavior and a regulator of be- havior. It refers to the particular beli ef s. customs. norms. and va l- ues of a set of people. usua ll y defined by a special hist ory. geo- graphy. and dialect or language. Almost all countries have different cultural groups. often ca ll ed ethn ic groups. within th ei r borders. The United States is multicultural or multiethnic. while J apa n is relatively monocultural. Health is no t just the absence of disease or infirmity but is a state of phys ical. psychological. a nd social we ll-bein g. He al th psy- chology is an app li ed discipline closely related to public hea lth . It aims to improve human functioning. especia ll y by better hea lth care and preve ntion programs. Each culture has it s own definition of health and hea lth service. Th e Western industrialized countries tend to use a biomedical model for their se rvices. emphasi zing in- dividual physical health . De ve loping co untries. especially Asian ones. have a more co ll ectivist. family-oriented. and holistic view of health and health service. Separat ion between mind and body is less distinct. Although Western ideas have penetrated deeply into many areas of the rest of the world. there rema in strong influences from widespread folk be li efs abo ut health. for in stance. most Chi- nese believe that healthy nutrition requir es a balance between hot and cold foods. and they accept and expect tra ditional Chinese medical prac ti ces such as herba l remedies. massage. and acupunc- ture. Wi thin the United States the many ethnic subcultures va ry in their willingness to accept Western medicine and in th ei r faith in tradition al helpers such as Lat in o c uranderos. How much do pe op le s aro und the world share regarding hea lth ') Ob viousl y. in physica l matters (as epidemics and o rgan tran spl a nt s demon strate) there is much in common. but what about psychological and sociocultural cha racteristics') One major debate in cross-cultural th eo ri z in g is between uni ve rsalists and rel- ativists (the etic-emic distinction) . Psychologists tend to tr y to find categories and principles that ap ply to a ll cultures in varyi ng amounts and intens it y: anthropologis ts point out the unique pat- tern s of each particu lar culture. Attempting to create a universal system. the World Health Organization ( 1992. 1993) has put forth an int ernationa l classification system f or diseases and indicators of health . Th e meas ur able indicators cover health statu s. po li cies. so- cia l and economic fa ctors. and primar y care services. Reports from over 1 50 WHO memb er states are usef ul. but questions remain about the co nsistency of diagnoses and practices acr oss countries and cultur es. Particula rl y problematic are misdiagnoses because of poor cross-cultural understa ndin g. Desp it e the difficult y in tr ansferr in g Western health pract ices. Beardsey & Pedersen (1997) describe not on ly some of the remark- able successes of intern ational pub li c health projects. such as the ne ar eradicati on of river blindness (in west Africa) and Guinea worm disease. but also the difficulties in con trolling malaria and

Transcript of CULTURE AND HEALTH - UGM

CULTURE AND HEALTH Culture is both a product of human behavio r and a regulat or of be­

havior. It refers to the particular beliefs. customs. norms. and va l­

ues of a set of people. usually defined by a spec ia l history. geo­

graphy. and dialect or language. Almost all countries have different

cultural groups. often ca lled et hn ic groups. within thei r borders.

The United States is multicultural or multi et hnic. while Japa n is

relatively monocultural.

Health is not just the absence of disease or infirmity but is a

state of physical. psychological. and socia l well-being. Heal th psy­

chol ogy is an applied discipline closely related to public health. It aims to improve human functioning. especially by bet ter health

care and prevention programs. Each culture has its own definition

of health and hea lth service. The Western industrialized countries

tend to use a biomedica l model fo r their services. emphasizing in­

dividual physica l health . Developing countries. especially Asian

ones. have a more collectivist. fa mily-oriented. and holistic view of

health and hea lth service. Separat ion between mind and body is

less dist inct. Although Western ideas have penetrated deepl y into

many areas of the rest of the world . there remain strong influences

from widespread folk beliefs about health . for instance. most Chi­

nese believe that hea lthy nutriti on requires a balance between hot

and cold foods. and they accept and expect traditional Chinese

medical practices such as herbal remedies. massage. and ac upunc­

ture. Wi thin the United States the many ethnic subcu ltu res va ry in

their willingness to accept Western medicine and in thei r faith in

traditional helpers such as Lat ino curanderos.

How much do peoples around the world share regard ing health ') Obviously. in physica l matters (as epidemics and o rgan

transplants demonstrate) there is much in common. but what

about psychological and soc ioc ultural cha racteristics') One major

debate in cross-cultural theorizing is between universalists and rel­

ativists (the etic-emic distinction) . Psycho logists tend to try to find

categories and principles that apply to a ll cultures in varyi ng

amounts and intensit y: anthropologis ts point out the unique pat­

terns of each particu lar culture. Attempting to create a universal system. the World Health Organization ( 1992. 1993) has put forth

an internationa l classification system for disea ses and indicators of

health . The measurable indicators cover hea lth status. po licies. so­

cia l and economic facto rs. and primary care se rvices. Reports from

over 150 WHO member states a re useful. but quest ions remain

about the consistency of diagnoses and practices across countries

and cultures. Particularly problematic are misdiagnoses because of

poor cross-cultural understanding.

Despite the difficult y in transferring Western hea lth pract ices. Beardsey & Pedersen (1997) describe not on ly some of the remark­able successes of international publi c heal th projects. such as the near eradicati on of river blindness (in west Africa) and Guinea

worm disease. but also the difficulties in cont rolling ma laria and

HIV infection/AIDS because of cultural differences in compliance

and education . They discuss how research by Cohen (1988) and

others has shown that social support (which va ries across cultures)

is important for a healthy immune system. Some health -re lated

practices are dramatically culture-bound. such as infanticide and

malnutrition with girl children because of boy preference in several

Asian countries. Certain mental illnesses. such as amok (sudden

frenzy). koro (fear of penis constriction), and taijin-kyofusho (fear

of being looked at) are thought to be culture-specific rather than

universal. Anorexia nervosa (self-starvation and distorted body

image) is mainly confined to Western countries. but more recently

has been showing up in Asian locations (Tanaka-Matsumi & Drag­uns, 1997).

Beliefs about causation of mental illness differ among cultures.

For instance, Bedouin-A rabs in Israel believe that symptoms occur

because of supernatural powers. such as God 's will or sorcery (Al­

Krenawi . 1999). The degree of acculturation is another aspect of

understanding meanings in cross-cultural work. One American

study showed a difference between normative beliefs of adoles­

cents with Middle Eastern backgrounds who were born in the

United States versus those who immigrated. The American-born

adolescents were more accepting of aggression (Souweidane & Huesmann. 1999). On the positive end of heal th . that is. life satis­

faction. there are strong differences between poorer and wealthier

nations, with poor people valuing financial success and people

from wealthier countries valuing home life and self-esteem (Oishi.

Diener. Lucas, & Suh, 1999). The research questions about health and ethnicity are numerous and intriguingly complex. especially

when they overlap with economic and educational factors.

One example of health and cultural issues from Indonesia is the

overuse of injections not related to diagnosis. Such injections. es­

pecially with reuse of needles, increase the risk of communicable

diseases such as hepatitis Band HIY. It is important to understand

that Indonesians like ceremonies. From birth to death. Indone­

sians are accustomed to rituals. The practice of injection by a med­

ical worker is like a ritual. The provider has to go through a certain

sequence in the injection preparation and process. The patients feel

the pain as the soluble preparation is inserted in their bodies. This

ritual seems to give both parties satisfaction. The providers have

done something. and the patients have received something directly

into their bodies. Such a ritual might seem strange to people from

developed countries. who are accustomed to being informed and

giving consent before medical intervention takes place yet; for

laypeople in Indonesia who are not well educated, the health ser­

vice provider is the authority for the treatment. and the patients do not have to kn ow anything (Hadiyono. 1997). To overcome this

problem. Hadiyono and colleagues (1996) used a behavioral inter­vention: both providers and consumers discussed the proper use of

injections in a small group led by a clinical pha rmacologist and a

behavioral scientist. This approach, using culturally sensitive be­

havioral methods and involving the recognition of in-group norms

and the development of consensus. has successfully reduced the

unnecessary use of injections in public health centers.

Since health is multidimensional world-wide. using only the

biomedical model for explaining health issues is limiting and inad­

equate. Many different disciplines need to take part. Specifically,

CULTURE AND HEALTH 411

social sciences. such as anthropology. demography, economics, ed­

ucation. ethics. political science. psychology. and sociology, have

been involved in health-related studies and policy making for

decades. To accomplish communication and cooperation among so many disciplines covering many cultures and countries is not an

easy task . What names to use? How to bring these different disci­

plines and traditions together? The involvement of social sciences

in health is reflected in names, with specialties such as medical an­

thropology, medical ethics. medical geography, and medical psy­

chology. The approach is still mostly within the given discipline.

Medical psychology, for example. has applied different psycho­

logical theories. research. assessment instruments, and therapies to physical diseases. The needed approach for many projects,

nonetheless. is more interdisciplinary so that social scientists and

health scientists are contributing together to research teams.

When a group has worked together for some time its approach

becomes transdisciplinary by nature. The name Health Social Sci­

ence (HSS) has been used within the International Clinical Epi­

demiology Network (INCLEN) since June 1987 (Higginbotham,

1994). In his paper. Higginbotham concluded that the INCLEN

model aims to inspire a transdisciplinary approach into interna­

tiona l health by promoting a common language among social sci­

entists working with clinical epidemiologists, and by sensitizing

clinicians to the contribution of social sciences in health research

and policy health.

One of the greatest challenges for social scientists is learning

how to collaborate successfully as equal partners with health sci ­

entists, especially medical doctors. To co ll aborate on an equal foot­

ing demands self-confidence. secure knowledge. and a willingness

to learn and communicate across disciplinary boundaries on the

pa rt of all team members. This collaboration leads to a multidisci­

plinary approach in the beginning. an interdisciplinary approach

in the process, and ideally. a transdisciplinary approach in the long

run as suggested by Rosenfield (1992) and Albrecht, Freeman. and

Higginbotham (1997). The area of culture and health requires a

broad perspective for working together to meet the challenges of globalization and the rapid growth of medical and social science

information.

REFERENCES

Albrecht. G., Freeman. S .. & Higginbotham, N. (1997). Complex­ity and human health; The case for a transdisciplinary para­

digm. Culture, Medicine. and Psychiatry, 00: 1- 38.

AI-Krenawi. A. (1999). Explanations of mental health symptoms

by the Bedouin-Arabs. International Journal 0/ Social Psychia­

tiT. 45. 56- 64.

Beardsley. L. M ., & Pedersen , P. (1997). Health and culture­

centered intervention. In 1. W. Berry. M. H. SegalL & C. Kagit­

cibasi (Eds.) Handbook a/cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 3. So­cial behavior and applications (2nd ed ., pp. 413- 448). Boston:

Allyn & Bacon.

Cohen, S. I. (1988). Voodoo death. the stress response and AIDS.

In T. P. Bridge & A. F. Mirsky (Eds.) Psychological, neuropsy­chiatric, and substance ahuse aspects of AIDS: Advances in bio-

412 CULTURE AND PSYCHOTHERAPY

chemical psychopharmacology (Vol. 44, pp. 95- 11 0). New York : Raven.

Hadiyono, 1. E. P. (1997). Overgebruik injecties in Indonesie (in the Dutch Language), WemosScoop. 3, 7- 8

Hadiyono, 1. E. P., Suryawati , S. , Danu. S. , Sunartono. & Santoso. B. (1996) . Interactional Group Discussion: Results of a con­trolled tria l using a behavioral intervention to red uce the use of injections in public health fac ilities. Social Science & Medicine.' An inlernarionaljol/rnal, 42(8), 1177- 11 84.

Higginbotham. N. (1994) . Capacity building for health social science: The international Cl inical Epidemiology Network (IN CLEN) social science program and the International Fo­

rum for Social Science in Health (IFSSH ). Acla TropiCC/. 57. 123- 137.

Oishi, S. , Diener, E. F .. Lucas, R . E .. & Suh. E. M. (1999) . Cross­cultura l va riat ions in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bu/­letin. 25, 980- 990.

Rosenfield. P. (1992). The potentia l of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and socia l sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 35(11). 1342- 13 57.

Souweidane, V , & Huesmann. L. R . (l999 ). The influence of American Urban culture on the development of normative be­liefs about aggression in Middle-Eastern immigrants. American Journal of COll1l11unity P.I'J'chologJ; 1 7, 239- 254.

Tanaka -Matsumi, 1., & Draguns, J. (1997). Culture and psy­chopathology. In 1. W Berry, M. H. SegalL & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.) Handbook of Cl'Os.I'-cu ILUrct! jJsycholog}': Vul. 3. Social he­havior and applications (2nd ed., pp. 449- 491). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

World Health Organization (1 992). The international classification of disease alld related health problems (10th revision). Geneva: WHO.

World Health Organizat ion (1 993). World health statistics al/llual. 1993. Geneva: WHO.

1. E . P. H ;\I) I YO~O

Gadjah lv/ada UniversiTY. YogyakarTa , Indonesia