Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

10
Cultural Heritage in REGional Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks NETworks REGNET REGNET Quality Assurance – D14

Transcript of Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

Page 1: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworksCultural Heritage in REGional NETworks

REGNETREGNET

Quality Assurance – D14

Page 2: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

27 March 2003

2

REGNET Final Project Review

OutlineOutline

Motorola GSG ItalyThe process framework:

Benefit of a process frameworkREGNET Process FrameworkThe process framework implementation

Quality Assurance elementsVerification & Validation Internationalisation (i18n) & Localisation (l10n) Configuration & Change Management

Page 3: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

27 March 2003

3

REGNET Final Project Review

Motorola GSG ItalyMotorola GSG Italy

Motorola Global Software Group Italy:

High Maturity Process Oriented Organization with a well defined SW Production Process

GSG Italy was certified SEI SW CMM Level 3 organization in Nov. 2002

Page 4: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

27 March 2003

4

REGNET Final Project Review

Benefit of a process frameworkBenefit of a process framework

An appropriate development methodology is in place

Standards and procedures are used

Adequate documentation is produced

Changes are controlled

Testing and verification are focused on areas of highest risk

Defects are identified earlier

Page 5: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

27 March 2003

5

REGNET Final Project Review

REGNET Process FrameworkREGNET Process Framework

Task Activity

Q_Gate - Review

Task Preview & Planning

Post Mortem

If exit criteria are met

If entry criteria are met

If exit criteria are not met

The Task preview & planning phase is conducted at the beginning of a phase, task or subtask, for the benefit of the project teams, producing a common understanding of the purpose and expected outcome of an activity.

The activity phase is the actual deployment of the work, object of the phase, task or sub-task...

The Quality Gate is a check to determine whether an activity’s output is fit for its intended purpose

The Post Mortem is a mechanism for learning from the completed activity

Page 6: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

27 March 2003

6

REGNET Final Project Review

Apr.1st 2001

19.04 Kick-off

07.06 Workshop

(TG)

11. 06 Workshop (CPG)

Aug.1st 2001

Dec.1st 2001

23. 08 Workshop (Themes)

25.10 First Review

Apr.1st 2002

Mar.31st 2003

21.11 C-TUsability Meeting

Aug.1st 2002

Dec.1st 2002

02.09 CPG

Meeting

04.07 Second Review

27.03 Third Review

03.02 C-TUsability Meeting

Phase 1 Phase 2

WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4

17.07 Technical Meeting (TG)

13.05 Technical Meeting (TG)

28.03 Final Meeting

Preview & Planning

(Post-Mortems)

The process framework implementation

12.09 Extended PJM Meeting

Q_Gate

Review

24.06 Extended PJM Meeting

18.03 Technical Meeting (TG)

28.01 Extended PJM Meeting

Page 7: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

27 March 2003

7

REGNET Final Project Review

Quality Assurance Elements (I)Quality Assurance Elements (I)

Identification of a Verification & Validation framework:

Verification

Document Review

Testing (White Box)

Validation

System Testing (Black Box)

Page 8: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

27 March 2003

8

REGNET Final Project Review

The REGNET Verification & Validation The REGNET Verification & Validation frameworkframework

WP1

Analysis of the state of the Art and

Development of Centers

WP4

Demonstration, Assessment and

Evaluation

WP3Validation of the

REGNET Demonstrator and preparation of the

Demonstration Phase

WP2Implementation of the

System and Preparation of

Service and Product Generation

PHASE 1 PHASE 2

Verification & Validation

Verification: Document Review &

Testing (White Box)

Embedded in the System Engineering Group and/or Quality Assurance Group

Validation: Testing (Black Box)

Independent: the V&V group is

independent of the development team

User group: a broad public participate

Page 9: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

27 March 2003

9

REGNET Final Project Review

Quality Assurance Elements (II)Quality Assurance Elements (II)

Definition of simple rules and a simple process to be followed for Internationalisation (i18n) & Localisation (l10n)

Configuration ManagementIdentification of CIs

Definition of a Naming Convention

Common repository structure

Change ManagementImplementation of a mechanism for controlled introduction of changes

Page 10: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.

27 March 2003

10

REGNET Final Project Review

Thank you!!!