Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.
-
Upload
arianna-preston -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.
![Page 1: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5514d09c550346b0478b4f64/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworksCultural Heritage in REGional NETworks
REGNETREGNET
Quality Assurance – D14
![Page 2: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5514d09c550346b0478b4f64/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
27 March 2003
2
REGNET Final Project Review
OutlineOutline
Motorola GSG ItalyThe process framework:
Benefit of a process frameworkREGNET Process FrameworkThe process framework implementation
Quality Assurance elementsVerification & Validation Internationalisation (i18n) & Localisation (l10n) Configuration & Change Management
![Page 3: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5514d09c550346b0478b4f64/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
27 March 2003
3
REGNET Final Project Review
Motorola GSG ItalyMotorola GSG Italy
Motorola Global Software Group Italy:
High Maturity Process Oriented Organization with a well defined SW Production Process
GSG Italy was certified SEI SW CMM Level 3 organization in Nov. 2002
![Page 4: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5514d09c550346b0478b4f64/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
27 March 2003
4
REGNET Final Project Review
Benefit of a process frameworkBenefit of a process framework
An appropriate development methodology is in place
Standards and procedures are used
Adequate documentation is produced
Changes are controlled
Testing and verification are focused on areas of highest risk
Defects are identified earlier
![Page 5: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5514d09c550346b0478b4f64/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
27 March 2003
5
REGNET Final Project Review
REGNET Process FrameworkREGNET Process Framework
Task Activity
Q_Gate - Review
Task Preview & Planning
Post Mortem
If exit criteria are met
If entry criteria are met
If exit criteria are not met
The Task preview & planning phase is conducted at the beginning of a phase, task or subtask, for the benefit of the project teams, producing a common understanding of the purpose and expected outcome of an activity.
The activity phase is the actual deployment of the work, object of the phase, task or sub-task...
The Quality Gate is a check to determine whether an activity’s output is fit for its intended purpose
The Post Mortem is a mechanism for learning from the completed activity
![Page 6: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5514d09c550346b0478b4f64/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
27 March 2003
6
REGNET Final Project Review
Apr.1st 2001
19.04 Kick-off
07.06 Workshop
(TG)
11. 06 Workshop (CPG)
Aug.1st 2001
Dec.1st 2001
23. 08 Workshop (Themes)
25.10 First Review
Apr.1st 2002
Mar.31st 2003
21.11 C-TUsability Meeting
Aug.1st 2002
Dec.1st 2002
02.09 CPG
Meeting
04.07 Second Review
27.03 Third Review
03.02 C-TUsability Meeting
Phase 1 Phase 2
WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4
17.07 Technical Meeting (TG)
13.05 Technical Meeting (TG)
28.03 Final Meeting
Preview & Planning
(Post-Mortems)
The process framework implementation
12.09 Extended PJM Meeting
Q_Gate
Review
24.06 Extended PJM Meeting
18.03 Technical Meeting (TG)
28.01 Extended PJM Meeting
![Page 7: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5514d09c550346b0478b4f64/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
27 March 2003
7
REGNET Final Project Review
Quality Assurance Elements (I)Quality Assurance Elements (I)
Identification of a Verification & Validation framework:
Verification
Document Review
Testing (White Box)
Validation
System Testing (Black Box)
![Page 8: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5514d09c550346b0478b4f64/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
27 March 2003
8
REGNET Final Project Review
The REGNET Verification & Validation The REGNET Verification & Validation frameworkframework
WP1
Analysis of the state of the Art and
Development of Centers
WP4
Demonstration, Assessment and
Evaluation
WP3Validation of the
REGNET Demonstrator and preparation of the
Demonstration Phase
WP2Implementation of the
System and Preparation of
Service and Product Generation
PHASE 1 PHASE 2
Verification & Validation
Verification: Document Review &
Testing (White Box)
Embedded in the System Engineering Group and/or Quality Assurance Group
Validation: Testing (Black Box)
Independent: the V&V group is
independent of the development team
User group: a broad public participate
![Page 9: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5514d09c550346b0478b4f64/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
27 March 2003
9
REGNET Final Project Review
Quality Assurance Elements (II)Quality Assurance Elements (II)
Definition of simple rules and a simple process to be followed for Internationalisation (i18n) & Localisation (l10n)
Configuration ManagementIdentification of CIs
Definition of a Naming Convention
Common repository structure
Change ManagementImplementation of a mechanism for controlled introduction of changes
![Page 10: Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5514d09c550346b0478b4f64/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
27 March 2003
10
REGNET Final Project Review
Thank you!!!