Cultural Contradictions of Scanning in an Evidence-based Policy Environment
-
Upload
wendy-schultz -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.010 -
download
1
Transcript of Cultural Contradictions of Scanning in an Evidence-based Policy Environment
Infinite Futures
The Cultural ContradictionsOf Scanning
In an Evidence-basedPolicy Environment
Dr. Wendy L. SchultzInfinite Futures, Oxford
http://www.infinitefutures.com/ * [email protected]
Constraints, Biases, Filters
Infinite Futures
Overview of presentation
• Why scanning? Feedstock for all other foresight activities
• Why not just major drivers and trends? Because environment isn’t static, nor can foresight be: changes itself changes:– Lifecycle: emerges, grows or collapses, matures– Must catch it early to have a hope of affecting it rather
than merely adapting to it (see gold standard)– Where do we look for emerging change?
• Contradictions: origins, details.
Infinite Futures
Overview, cont’d.
• Addressing contradictions in their own terms:– Validating scan sources;– Validating scan data.
• What are other weaknesses in basic scanning? How can we overcome other biases and filters?– Integral futures– Causal Layered Analysis– Spiral Dynamics– Verge (ethnographic framework) and alternate
taxonomies
• Get outside the confines of your own perceptions.
Infinite Futures
CHANGE
trends, drivers, emerging issues
+ - x %extrapolate, assess impacts
scenario 1scenario 2
scenario 3
scenario 4
scenario n
STRATEGIES
VISION- goals, values -
build on positives,counter negatives
Scanning is the essential feedstock for all subsequent foresight activities:
Infinite Futures
The map isn’t the territory,
Navigational charts vs. radar:you need both.
because the territory is dynamic.
Infinite Futures
Horizon Scanning
• Primary futures tool for identifying and monitoring the emergence, growth, and coalescence of change.
• Related to issues management and competitive intelligence.
• ”Environment” refers to the information environment – all media – and ”scanning” to the logically structured, iterative monitoring of selected information sources.
Infinite Futures
“Gold Standard” for Scanning*
• Evaluating a scan ”hit” (change datum):– Subjectively or objectively new?– Confirming/reinforcing, or negating/balancing?– Time horizon for ”emergence”?– Credibility of source?
• Ideally, a scan hit identifies an emerging issue that is objectively new even to experts, confirms or is confirmed by additional scan hits, and that has been identified in time for social dialogue, impact assessment, and policy formation.
*Dr. Peter Bishop, Univ. of Houston - Clear Lake
Infinite Futures
WILDCARD!!
TIME
numberof cases;degreeofpublicawareness
local;few cases;emergingissues
global; multiple dispersed cases;trends and megatrends
scientists;artists; radicals; mystics
specialists’journals and websites
layperson’s magazines,websites, documentaries
newspapers,news magazines
governmentinstitutions
Mapping a trend’s diffusion into public awareness from its starting point as an emerging issue of change.
adapted fromGraham Molitor
Change: issue life-cycle.
Infinite Futures
Identifying Sources of Surprise:
• Source acquisition: opinion leaders.– Science, technology, innovation: sources in which
those communities themselves announce news.– Social and cultural change: sources expressing
values and ideas bubbling among artists, youth, marginalised communities; often ‘fringe’ publications or media.
• Sources of surprise:– Look for challenges to scientific paradigms;– Look for challenges to the status quo.
Infinite Futures
Origin of contradiction:
Government desire for advanced warning.
• Political culture: need to look responsible, authoritative NOT tentative;
• Scientific culture: need to assemble credible, objective, data-based arguments
Horizon scanning:
• Beginning of research, not end;
• “N of 1”;• Unearths contradictions;• Subjective, not objective;• “Unscientific” sources;• Systems-based;• Unfamiliar concepts.
Infinite Futures
Research vs. scanning…
• Research criteria:– Credible;– Documented;– Authoritative;– Statistically
significant;
• Scanning:– Questionable
credibility;– Difficult to
document;– Fringe sources;– Case studies --
statistically insignificant.
Infinite Futures
Research vs. scanning…
• Research criteria:– Coherent: data
agree;– Consensus:
experts agree;– Theoretically
grounded;– Mono-disciplinary.
• Scanning:– Incoherent --
data varies widely;
– Experts disagree or attack outright;
– Demands new theories;
– Multi-disciplinary.
Infinite Futures
Validating Scan Sources:
• Distinguish among expert, popular, or fringe sources:– Lancet for medicine: expert;– The Economist for world affairs: popular;– Counterculture for value shifts: fringe.
• Establish sources’ credibility as opinion leaders for their communities:– Citation by community members;– Market niche / branding;– Distribution data;– Media.
Infinite Futures
Validating Scan Data:
• Problem: useful scan hits -- close enough to the point of origin to allow policy leverage -- are “weak signals”; often only one case.
• Validation:– Confirmation: accrue multiple citations;– Convergence: monitor emerging scientific
consensus; and– Parallax: acquire view from multiple
perspectives;A participatory team approach assists validation.
Infinite Futures
Weaknesses in scanning:
• Frustrations:– Information overload…so many sources, so
little time!– Familiarity breeds boredom: nothing seems
new.
• Needs:– Segue more easily into discussion of
impacts and scenario development– Explicitly acknowledge that transformative
change emerges from turbulence (chaos) produced when emerging issues collide
Infinite Futures
Adding analytic depth:(Hines, 2003)
• Integral Futures (Slaughter, 1999)– Melds FS with Wilbur’s integral philosophy– Four quadrants: individual exterior world;
collective exterior; collective internal; and individual internal
• Causal Layered Analysis (Inayatullah, various)– Four layers: litany/events; systems/structures;
values/worldviews; and myths/metaphors.
• Spiral Dynamics (Voros, 2001)
Infinite Futures
Integral Futures: Four Quadrants
Individual
Collective
Interior Exterior
BEHAVIORAL
SOCIAL
INTENTIONAL
CULTURAL
Subjective
Inter-Subjective
Objective
Inter-Objective
“I”
“WE”
“IT”
“ITS”
Evidence-basedPolicyScanningData CollectionComfort Zone
measurable
interpreted
Infinite Futures
• “Litany”– events, trends, problems, “word on the street,” media
spin, official positions.
• “Causes”– structures, inter-relationships, systems, technical and
policy explanations
• “Worldview”– culture, values, how language frames/constrains the
issue
• “Myth/Metaphor”– Collective archetypes, emotional responses, visual
images
From superficial to subtle:
the five layers of CLA
Infinite Futures
CausesCauses
Metaphors and MythsMetaphors and Myths
ProblemProblem
Social, Economic, Cultural
Discourse Analysis: culture, values, language, postmodernisms, Spiral dynamics memes (alternatives)
Myth/Metaphor Analysis: Jungian archetypes, ancient bedrock
stories,gut level responses, emotional responses,visual images - may not be words for it(visioning)
WorldviewWorldview
The “Litany”:Official public description of issueobservational: events, trends, diagnosed problems, media
spin,opinions, policy; visible and audible; unconnected (scanning)
Social Science Analysis:Short-term historical factsstart connecting; systems analysis, feedbackinterconnections, technical explanations, social
analysis,policy analysis (systems)
Sources: R. Slaughter, “Integral Operating System,” World Future Society, July 2003, drawing on Sohail Inayatullah;Dennis List, “3 Maps of the Future,” July 18, 2003; Andy Hines, UH-Clear Lake, 2006.
Continuous
Years
Societal/Civilizational
Decades
Time Scale of Change
Infinite Futures
CHANGE!
Using CLA to create alternative scenarios / visions:
Identify the litany: current conditions & events.
Analyze the causes: interrelationships, systems.
Explore the worldview: values and cultural icons.
Unveil the myths/metaphors: archetypes, emotions.
Analyse down, identifying alternative litanies, causes, worldviews, and myths: create change by choosing alternatives as you surface.
Infinite Futures
Integral Futures | Causal Layers
Individual
Collective
Interior Exterior
BEHAVIORAL
SOCIAL
INTENTIONAL
CULTURAL
Subjective
Inter-Subjective
Objective
Inter-Objective
“WORLDVIEWS,MENTAL MODELS”
“MYTHS,METAPHORS”
“LITANIES”
“CAUSES,SYSTEMS”
measurable
interpreted
Infinite Futures
Spiral Dynamics
• Popularised by Don Beck, derived from Clare Graves• Locus of perception; goals in life• Eight layers (http://www.spiraldynamics.org/Graves/colors.htm):
– TURQUOISE: global community / life force; survival of Earth; consciousness
– YELLOW: independence / self-worth; fitting a living system; knowing – GREEN: harmony / love; joining together for mutual growth; awareness– ORANGE: opportunity / success; competing to achieve results; influence– BLUE: stability / order; obedience to earn later reward; meaning– RED: power / action; asserting self to dominate others; control– PURPLE: safety / security; protection from harm; family bonds– BEIGE: survival; biogenic needs satisfaction; reproduction
Infinite Futures
Taxonomies:
• Expert defined: STEEP, PESTE, EPISTLE, PESTLEC, SEPES, SPEED, GLIMPSES, etc.– Defined by the origin point of change;– Most too coarse-grained: refine with
subcategories, eg, social: lifestyle; environment: biosphere.
– Many emerging issues cross categories.
• Innovations: VERGE ethnofutures framework– Defined by the impact point of change (see
following slide).
Infinite Futures
The processes and technology through which we create goods & services
The goods & services we create, and the ways in which we aquire and use them
Social structures & relationships which
link people and organizations
The concepts, ideas and
paradigms we use to define the world
around us
The technologies used to connect
people, places and things
EthnoFutures Scanning Framework
Infinite Futures
“Folksonomies:”
• Taxonomies: industrial age culture -– Expert defined;– Hierarchical: top-down classification.
• Folksonomies: information age culture -– Open source and participatory;– Organic: emergent structure;– TagClouds.
Infinite Futures
Excellent scanning generates shockwaves.
Those shockwaves shake assumptions.Shaking assumptions creates turbulence:
-- creativity emerges ---- but controversy emerges as well.
Is excellent scanning even possible in a policy environment?
Infinite Futures
Thank you!
Dr. Wendy L. SchultzInfinite Futures: foresight research and [email protected]: +44-(0)1865-284377FAX: +44-(0)1865-274125Skype: wendyinfutures