CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland...
-
Upload
phillip-reeves -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland...
![Page 1: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dd25503460f94ac9747/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CT Reform
London27 January 2005
Capital Assets and Cars
Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith
Inland Revenue Business Tax
![Page 2: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dd25503460f94ac9747/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Where are we now?
Looking at ways of
• Modernising the taxation of capital profits
• Simplifying and streamlining the approach to capital expenditure and capital profits
By
• Building on the existing capital allowances regime
![Page 3: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dd25503460f94ac9747/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Basics
Use the capital allowances approach to:
• give relief for capital expenditure
• bring profits and losses into income
• spread profits and losses on disposal
![Page 4: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dd25503460f94ac9747/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Farewell to….?
• Separate computations of profits under two regimes
• The complexities of industrial buildings allowance
• The complexities of roll-over relief
• Advantages?
• Disadvantages?
![Page 5: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dd25503460f94ac9747/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Particular assets
Buildings:
• A new definition of ‘building’ for tax purposes
• bringing clarity and compliance savings?
• The benefits of pooling
• bringing simplicity and spreading profits and losses?
• Integration of capital profits into the income regime
• bringing economic coherence to the tax system?
![Page 6: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dd25503460f94ac9747/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Issues
• Transition?
• Bringing assets into the new regime
• Dealing with legacy losses
• Limiting the need to keep two systems operating
• Group transactions?
• Individuals?
![Page 7: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dd25503460f94ac9747/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Particular Assets
• Cars
• Current regime essentially unchanged for over 30 years.
• Distinction based only on cost of car.
• Single asset pool and leasing restriction requirements can increase compliance burden on all businesses.
![Page 8: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dd25503460f94ac9747/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Possible Way Forward
• Need to respond to wider environmental concerns
• Encourage purchases of “clean” cars.
• Pooling for cars
• Link to established vehicle tax regimes e.g. CCT and VED
![Page 9: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dd25503460f94ac9747/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Trading and Investment Companies
• Management expenses modernised Finance Bill 2004
• Continue to consider the case for extending the Substantial Shareholding Exemption to disposals by investment companies.
• The SSE itself is relatively new. Need to assess its impact.
• Government would like to explore further the behavioural effects of an extension - eg with venture capital industry.
• Not considering extension to non-trading companies at the investee level.