CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland...

9
CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax

Transcript of CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland...

Page 1: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.

CT Reform

London27 January 2005

Capital Assets and Cars

Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith

Inland Revenue Business Tax

Page 2: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.

Where are we now?

Looking at ways of

• Modernising the taxation of capital profits

• Simplifying and streamlining the approach to capital expenditure and capital profits

By

• Building on the existing capital allowances regime

Page 3: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.

The Basics

Use the capital allowances approach to:

• give relief for capital expenditure

• bring profits and losses into income

• spread profits and losses on disposal

Page 4: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.

Farewell to….?

• Separate computations of profits under two regimes

• The complexities of industrial buildings allowance

• The complexities of roll-over relief

• Advantages?

• Disadvantages?

Page 5: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.

Particular assets

Buildings:

• A new definition of ‘building’ for tax purposes

• bringing clarity and compliance savings?

• The benefits of pooling

• bringing simplicity and spreading profits and losses?

• Integration of capital profits into the income regime

• bringing economic coherence to the tax system?

Page 6: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.

Issues

• Transition?

• Bringing assets into the new regime

• Dealing with legacy losses

• Limiting the need to keep two systems operating

• Group transactions?

• Individuals?

Page 7: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.

Particular Assets

• Cars

• Current regime essentially unchanged for over 30 years.

• Distinction based only on cost of car.

• Single asset pool and leasing restriction requirements can increase compliance burden on all businesses.

Page 8: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.

Possible Way Forward

• Need to respond to wider environmental concerns

• Encourage purchases of “clean” cars.

• Pooling for cars

• Link to established vehicle tax regimes e.g. CCT and VED

Page 9: CT Reform London 27 January 2005 Capital Assets and Cars Jo Brindley and Malcolm Smith Inland Revenue Business Tax.

Trading and Investment Companies

• Management expenses modernised Finance Bill 2004

• Continue to consider the case for extending the Substantial Shareholding Exemption to disposals by investment companies.

• The SSE itself is relatively new. Need to assess its impact.

• Government would like to explore further the behavioural effects of an extension - eg with venture capital industry.

• Not considering extension to non-trading companies at the investee level.