Cross cultural variations in attachment type
-
Upload
sssfcpsychology -
Category
Self Improvement
-
view
4.753 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Cross cultural variations in attachment type
![Page 1: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Glossary
•Strange Situation •Secure
•Insecure-Avoidant •Insecure-Resistant
•Situation 6 •Main & Solomon •Stranger anxiety •Separation anxiety •Reunion behaviour
•Willingness to explore •Sensitivity hypothesis
•Temperament hypothesis
![Page 2: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Cross-Cultural Variations in attachment type
![Page 3: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Definition
The ways members of a society/culture vary in terms of their social practises
As we already know – these variations can effect infant behaviour/development and attachment type
![Page 4: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Some examples...
Japan – It’s rare to leave an infant alone and their mothers rarely leave them in the care of others.
What attachment type do you think is most common in Japan?
Insecure-Resistant
![Page 5: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Some examples...
Germany – Parents value independence. Parenting focuses on making the child as independent as possible
(behaviours exhibited by securely attached children would be considered ‘clingy’)
What attachment type do you think is most
common in Germany? Insecure-Avoidant
![Page 6: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Some examples...
Israeli Kibbutz– Kibbutz life is very ‘family centred’ and so children are raised at home by their parents
What attachment type do you think is most common in Israeli Kibbutz?
Insecure-Resistant
![Page 7: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Key research: Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg
Aim: To investigate cross-cultural differences in attachment type through meta-analysis of research, comparing findings of the Strange Situation research conducted in other cultures
Research Method: Laboratory using observations
Procedure: They used Ainsworth’s Strange situation
![Page 8: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Strange Situation
What 4 behaviours did the strange situation observations focus on?
1. Separation anxiety
2. Stranger anxiety
3. Reunion behaviour
4. Willingness to explore
![Page 9: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Procedure continued…
Compared the findings of 32 studies across 8 different countries that used the strange situation to measure attachment type. Specifically comparing Western (e.g. Britain and Germany) and non-western cultures (e.g. Japan, China)
![Page 10: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Findings:
Country Secure Insecure-Avoidant
Insecure-Resistant
Germany 57 35 8
Britain 75 22 3
Israel 64 7 29
Japan 68 5 27
China 50 25 25
USA 65 21 14
1.5 times greater variation within cultures than between
![Page 11: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Conclusions
There are cross-cultural differences in attachment types.
This could be due to cultural practices, cultural expectations of parents returning to work, cultural expectations of child independence.
However, there are greater differences within cultures than between cultures.
![Page 12: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
A02 - Evaluation
1. Strange Situation is easy to replicate
2. Ethnocentric
3. Low ecological Validity
4. Not all children fit into one attachment type
![Page 13: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Positive – A02
The strange situation has been replicated all over the world – not just in Western cultures
![Page 14: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Negative – A02
Ethnocentric means: based only on one
culture The strange situation suggests that the
behaviour of all children in all cultures can be interpreted from the same viewpoint
e.g. Using the same 3 classifications
![Page 15: Cross cultural variations in attachment type](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051609/54634ff9af79599b048b5e12/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Negative – A02
Low Ecological Validity
Artificial Setting
Can’t generalise findings beyond the research setting