CROSS – ACCEPTANCE OF TRACK MACHINES INTRODUTORY REMARKS Paris 11 th June 2010.
-
Upload
kory-clark -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of CROSS – ACCEPTANCE OF TRACK MACHINES INTRODUTORY REMARKS Paris 11 th June 2010.
CROSS – ACCEPTANCE OF TRACK MACHINESINTRODUTORY REMARKS
ParisParis1111thth June 2010 June 2010
ParisParis1111thth June 2010 June 2010
Current situation
Some striking examples
Invitation for discussion
ParisParis1111thth June 2010 June 2010
A lot of effort was made by EFRTC members in these last years to contribute to standardisation work with a strong believe that those standards as a set of harmonized and approved rules and regulations on railway applications will be applied.
ParisParis1111thth June 2010 June 2010
However, up to now, it is hardly possible for contractors and their machines from one country to be certified/qualified to work in another country even if reference is made to a published standard.
Even though, there are some examples of mutual acceptance through bilateral agreements, in practice there is no cross-acceptance of track machinery, staff and works in Europe.
ParisParis1111thth June 2010 June 2010
The real situation shows that the same machine has to be homologated each time for each country what multiplies costs and time of immobilization.
Homologation rules and specifications differs enormously from country to country.
ParisParis1111thth June 2010 June 2010
ParisParis1111thth June 2010 June 2010
Significant differences in the procedures, costs and deadlines for homologation of track machines in Europe.
The same type of track machine already accepted to run and work in one country has to be certified each time once again for working in other country.
ParisParis1111thth June 2010 June 2010
There are any set of specifications for manufacturers concerning design documents that they have to deliver for certification.
Due to this complexity of procedures manufactures refuse to assist their clients (contractors) in their applications for homologations of machines.
Many specific national requirements are imposed on track machines over UIC rules and standards.
ParisParis1111thth June 2010 June 2010
One certified track machine in one country was not accepted to work in one neighbouring country without changing boogies/wheels what has nothing to do with certification.
There is no clear evidence who imposes more additional and costly equipment on track machines which in some cases are not even installed on locomotives as e.g. register of events and ETCS in general.
ParisParis1111thth June 2010 June 2010
There is no distinction for authorization for to basic modes:
Driving as track machine with limited speed to track site
Being pulled as a wagon to other workplace
ParisParis1111thth June 2010 June 2010
In order to reach some clarifications on these important issues the Board has decided to invited to this General Meeting:
Mrs Ny Tiana Tournier, Head of vehicle authorization section from European Railway Agency
Mr. Franz Messerli, Assistant to Matisa General Manager