Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study
description
Transcript of Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study
![Page 1: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study
Angela Broughton, Claudette Johnson, Deborah Knutson, Eileen Padilla &
Danica Stout
Grand Canyon UniversityNUR: 649E Nursing Education Seminar II
Professor Jacquie Lisicki May 22, 2013
![Page 2: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Learner Objectives
Upon completion of the program, participants will be able to:Describe the pathophysiology of CHF and how the diagnosis of CHF is determined.
![Page 3: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Learner Objectives
Explain the difference between systolic and diastolic heart failure and the importance of assessing left ventricular function in suspected CHF patients
![Page 4: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Learner Objectives
Describe the role of appropriate medications for CHF patients
Identify the components of appropriate discharge planning for CHF patients.
![Page 5: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Evaluation Methods for Objectives
Observation
Participation
![Page 6: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Evaluation Methods for Objectives
Pre/Post Test
Diagram fill-in
![Page 7: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Evaluation Methods for Objectives
Interactive Case Scenarios
Simulation Lab
![Page 8: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Observation
Advantages
Immediate feedback
Assess Attitude and Values
Immediate mediation
Participation
Advantages
Easy preparation
Inexpensive
Immediate Feedback
Evaluation Advantages & Disadvantages
![Page 9: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Pre & Post Test
Advantages
Efficient assessment
Assess performance and knowledge
Diagram
Advantages
Good for visual students
Compact way to convey information
Interesting, convincing, forceful
Quick way to visualize information
Evaluation Advantages & Disadvantages
![Page 10: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Evaluation Advantages & Disadvantages
Interactive Case Scenarios
Advantages
Participatory
Assess problem solving skills
Application of knowledge and skill
Simulation Lab
Advantages
Realistic, Interactive
Immediate Specific Feedback
Integrate theory and practice
Promotes independence
![Page 11: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Acceptable Outcomes
Pre & Post Designed Testing- Cognitive Domain
Does not pre-determine how a student can learn, however can determine knowledge base
Analyzes conclusions drawn from the information in lecture form.
Assesses knowledge learned in the class (in post testing).
![Page 12: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Acceptable Outcomes
Observation & Simulation- PsychomotorDomain Teach, learn and practice Safe environment Encourages close interaction in learning Ultimate level is at skill performance-
automatic without practice needed.
![Page 13: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Acceptable Outcomes
Participation/Discussion- Audio Domain Active learning should be encouraged Discuss CHF in a report of the consequences
on diet and medication non-compliance Discuss in this same report that patient
contribution and taking action in diet and medications make a big difference in how they feel.
![Page 14: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Assessment Model for Evaluation Design
CIPP Decision-Oriented Evaluation Framework
Context Input Process Product
![Page 15: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
CIPP Evaluation Model
Context Evaluation– Identify target population– Needs assessment (pre/post testing, observation)– Textbook knowledge applied to practice
![Page 16: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
CIPP Evaluation Model
Input Evaluation– Identifies & assesses:
System capabilitiesAlternative program strategiesProcedural designs for implementationStudent plan of care & interventions
![Page 17: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
CIPP Evaluation Model
Process Evaluation– Detects defects– Advantages vs. disadvantages– Evaluate performance, time
management, documentation– Simulation-Educators can
observe & intervene
![Page 18: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
CIPP Evaluation Model
Product Evaluation– Collect description/Analysis of Outcomes– Prioritization of goals and outcomes– Interpret results
![Page 19: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Conclusion
Evaluation is accomplished through observation, participation, pre/post testing, diagrams, case studies, and simulation.
Effective evaluation strategies must consider the purpose, advantages and disadvantages of the evaluation tool.
CIPP Evaluation Framework-measures weaknesses/strengths, provides alternative options/information for decision makers
![Page 20: Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815b97550346895dc99ae5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ReferencesAnderson, O. C. (2010). A Study of Teacher-Mediated Enhancement of Students’ Organization of Earth Science Knowledge Using
Web Diagrams as a Teaching Device. Journal of Science Teacher Education , 21, 683-701.Ari, A. (2009). The effect of quizzing on learning as a tool of assessment. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences , 8 (27), 202.Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2012). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier-Saunders.Carmichael, E., & Farrell, H. (2012). Evaluation of the effectiveness of online resources in developing student critical thinking:
Review of literature and case study of a critical thinking online site [Journal]. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ974914.pdf
Clifton, S. L. & Schriner, C.L. (2010). Assessing the quality of multiple choice test items. Nursing Educator, 35(1). 25-34.Flannelly, L. T. (2001). Using feedback to reduce students’ judgment bias on test questions. Journal of Nursing Education, 40. 10-
16.Founds, S. Z. (2011). Development of high-fidelity simulated clinical experiences for baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of
Professional Nursing , 27 (1), 5-9.Garrett, B. , MacPhee, M., & Jackson, C. (2010). High-fidelity patient simulation: Considerations for effective learning. Nursing
Education Perspectives, 31(5), 309-313.Hall, M., Daly, B., & Madigan, E. (2010). Use of anecdotal notes by clinical nursing faculty: a descriptive study. The Journal Of
Nursing Education, 49(3), 156-159. doi:10.3928/01484834-20090915-03Hill, C. (2006). Integrating clinical experience into the concept mapping process. Nurse Educator, 31(1). 36-39.Jeffries, P. (2007). Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. New York, NY: National League for
Nursing.Oermann, M.H., Yarbrough, S. S., Saewert, K. J., Ard, N., & Charasika,M. E. (2009). Clinical evaluations and grading practices in
schools of nursing: National survey findings Part II. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(6). 352-357.Pacsi, A. (2008). Human simulators in nursing education. Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association , 39 (2), 8-11.Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. (2006). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.Reed, S. J. (2010). Designing a simulation for student evaluations using Scriven’s key evaluation checklist. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 6(2). 41-44.Vetter, R. E. (2009). Learning to be an effective teacher: strengthening observational skills. Missouri Journal of Health, Physical
Education, Recreation, and Dance , 19, 4-14.Williams, S. M. & Beattie, H. J. (2006). Problem based learning in the clinical setting- A systemic review. Nurse Education Today,
28(2). 146-154.