Crisil Analysis Union Budget

download Crisil Analysis Union Budget

of 62

description

budget 2015 analysis by crisil

Transcript of Crisil Analysis Union Budget

  • !!" #$%#$& &'%"#

    %#$ !!!"#$&&$% ( )*"& #(&"&+!,,,!-!#$"%&-"#$ & &&-&!"#$ &%& & #$ . ! % .#(& &-/&/ #$ &'- .''"#(!-!

    #$&!!

    !!&&.

    &&&01&& # & &! "& "! ##2 # 3 0 1 4 5 5

    622# # !"

    #$! &78!"& & 798#1 ! !.&92&&&&92#: 2 #& 22

    2&! &49 2"&78!!!&&: -&&49 2#;&2&4

    #

  • I

    Contents

    Key Messages 1

    Economy

    Economic analysis 3

    Industry

    Overall sectoral impact 14

    Capital markets

    Capital market 22

    Annexure: Sector wise Impact

    Airports Infrastructure 26

    Auto components & Tyres 27

    Automobiles 29

    Banking 31

    Cement 32

    Construction 33

    Fertilisers 34

    Hotels 35

    Household appliances 36

    Information technology 37

    Media and Entertainment 38

    Non-ferrous metals 39

    Oil and Gas 41

    Paper 43

    Petrochemicals 44

    Pharmaceuticals 46

    Ports 47

    Power 48

    Real Estate 49

    Roads 50

    Steel 51

    Sugar 53

    Telecom 54

    Textile 55

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    This Page is Intentially Left Blank

  • 1

    Key Messages

    Economy

    Realistic fiscal targets, but slippage possible in disinvestment: The government has stuck to a realistic target of

    fiscal deficit at 3.9% of GDP for 2015-16 as opposed to the Finance Commissions recommendation of 3.6%. It has

    managed to increase allocation for capital expenditure (to go up by 25.5% to Rs. 2,414 billion) because of the

    headroom created from savings in oil subsidies and hike in excise duties on petrol and diesel. As a share of GDP,

    capital expenditure will increase from 1.5% in 2014-15 to 1.7% in 2015-16. Even though tax collection targets look

    achievable, there are chances of slippage in capital (disinvestment) receipts, which might bloat the fiscal deficit to

    4.2% in the absence of any expenditure cut.

    Getting public sector to revive investments: The budget lays focus on public investments, which will have large

    spillovers on growth if implemented effectively. Despite pressure on fiscal consolidation, enough room has been

    created for infrastructure spending through the governments own resources and by nudging PSUs to invest more.

    Focus clearly is on four sectors -- roads, railways, power and rural development. This emphasis on strengthening

    transportation infrastructure will also boost manufacturing. Overall, the budget is growth-enhancing as it supports a

    mild pick-up in public investments, which can draw in private investments over time.

    Fiscal federalism is an enabler: The government has raised states share in total divisible pool of tax revenues to

    42% from 32% as per the recommendation of the 14th Finance Commission, recording the biggest-ever increase in

    vertical tax devolution. This not only increases the pool of resources available to the states but also raises flexibility

    to help states design, implement and finance programmes according to their specific needs. Total transfers from the

    centre to the states have increased from 4.5% of GDP in 2013-14, 5.5% in 2014-15 to 6.0% in 2015-16.

    Industry

    Financial sector reforms a structural positive: Inclusion of NBFCs under the SARFAESI Act and new

    bankruptcy code will provide a boost to recovery efforts and help rein in asset quality problems over the long run.

    The setting up of autonomous bank board bureau for public sector banks is a step in the right direction. It is

    expected to provide greater functional autonomy and pave way for bank holding company structure which will

    optimise governments capital contribution.

    Greater public funding and innovative financing schemes to support infrastructure: Higher government

    allocations coupled with increase in funding availability for the infrastructure sector through National Infrastructure

    Investment Fund, higher fuel cess for roads and rationalisation of tax on Infrastructure Investment Trusts will provide

    significant opportunity for construction and capital goods companies.

    Minor changes in tax rates, but glide path to lower rates and simplification: True to its promise, the finance

    minister has avoided undertaking many sector/product specific changes in duties or exemptions. On the direct tax

    front, too, in line with the Finance Ministers stated philosophy, the budget has provided a path towards lowering of

    corporate tax rate and simultaneously doing away with multiple exemptions to simplify the tax administration and

    reduce disputes.

    Capital Markets

    Incentivising financial savings and social security: The Budget includes measures to promote financial savings

    and enhancing coverage of pension and health insurance. Gold bond scheme is also intended to encourage shift

    from non-productive to productive saving. However, the efficacy of the schemes needs to be watched - given the

    countrys penchant for physical gold holdings.

    Little to cheer for the bond markets: Tax-free infrastructure bonds, encouragement for insurance and pension

    products, clarity of taxation for Alternative Investment Funds etc. will help channel more investment to the bond

    markets. Also, given the ambitious plans for improving infrastructure, debt markets need to play a vital role.

    However, measures to catalyse the bond markets continue to remain elusive.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    Economy

  • 3

    Economy analysis

    Indian Economy Outlook

    2013-14 2014-15F 2015-16F Budget Impact

    GDP (y-o-y %) 6.9 7.4* 7.9 The budget supports a mild pick-up in public investments

    which can crowd in private investments over time

    CPI inflation (%, average) 9.5 6.5 5.8 Despite shifting the fiscal target by a year, commitment to

    stick to fiscal consolidation is a plus for the downward

    trending inflation and augurs well for further rate cuts by

    RBI

    Fiscal Deficit (% of GDP) 4.5 4.1** 3.9 Headroom created by savings on fuel subsidy bill and

    increased income from duty hikes has allowed the

    government to tread the fiscal consolidation path with ease

    10 year G-sec yield (%, March-end) 8.8 7.7 7.5 Rate cuts and a restrained market borrowing programme

    of the government would make yields go further south

    Note: F=CRISIL Forecast, *CSO advance estimate, ** Budget estimate

    Source: RBI, CSO, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, CRISIL Research

    Is the fiscal arithmetic credible?

    The fiscal arithmetic laid out in the budget for 2015-16 is a standout when compared with the previous ones for the

    following reasons:

    o The government continues to follow the path of fiscal consolidation by aiming to bring down fiscal deficit to 3.9%

    of GDP in 2015-16 from 4.1% of GDP in 2014-15. There is, however, a relaxation of 30 basis points when

    compared with the 3.6% target set by the 14th Finance Commission (FFC). This is justified because:

    Greater devolution to states will constrain central government finances.

    Thrust on capital spending means additional money generated by relaxing the fiscal deficit target will be

    used to improve the productive potential of the economy

    o Nominal GDP growth target is realistic at 11.5% for 2015-16, same as for 2014-15.

    o Revenue targets look achievable though scope of slippage remains on the disinvestment front.

    o Rationalisation of the overall subsidy bill is still not adequate, though the trend of carrying forward arrears has

    been reduced substantially.

    Do the numbers add up?

    The government has stuck to a more realistic fiscal deficit target of 3.9% of GDP for 2015-16 compared with the

    Finance Commissions recommendation of 3.6% so as to provide an impetus to investments.

    Allocation to capex is made possible by savings in oil subsidies and hike in excise duties on petrol and diesel.

    Capex in 2015-16 is budgeted to increase 25.5% to Rs 2,414 billion. As a share of GDP, it is slated to rise from

    1.5% in 2014-15 to 1.7% in 2015-16.

    We estimate that the extra revenue generated on account of excise duty hikes on petrol and diesel will be Rs 780

    billion and savings in petroleum subsidies over last year account for another Rs 267 billion. Together, the headroom

    created is of Rs 1,047 billion or close to 0.74% of GDP in 2015-16.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    4

    Figure 1 & 2 : Headroom created on different accounts in FY16

    Item Revenue

    accrued

    (Rs. Bn.)

    Hike in excise duty on petrol & diesel 780

    Lower fuel subsidy bill due to fall in oil

    prices 267

    Source: Budget documents, CRISIL Research

    What could upset the applecart?

    Tax collection targets are achievable, risk is on the divestment front

    The overall tax collection target assumed in the budget appears manageable. Gross tax to GDP ratio increases

    marginally from 9.9% in 2014-15 to 10.2% in 2015-16. The budget assumes a tax buoyancy of 1.4% for 2015-16

    compared with 0.9% achieved in 2014-15 but this is largely due to structural changes such as higher excise on

    petrol and diesel and increase in the service tax rate 12.36% to 14%

    Figure 3: Tax buoyancy

    Source: Budget documents, CRISIL Research

    0.55

    0.19

    0.00

    0.10

    0.20

    0.30

    0.40

    0.50

    0.60

    Petrol and Diesel Excise Hike Lower oil Subsidies

    (% of GDP)

    1.6

    0.2 0.2

    1.3

    0.8

    1.3

    0.7

    0.9

    1.4

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 RE FY16 BE

  • 5

    Figure 4: Tax collection targets

    Rs billion FY13 FY14 FY15RE FY16BE Average

    growth

    during FY12-

    FY15

    Growth

    assumption for

    FY16

    Gross Tax Revenue 10,362 11,387 12,514 14,495 12.1 15.8

    Corporation Tax 3,563 3,947 4,261 4,706 9.7 10.5

    Income tax 1,965 2,429 2,786 3,274 19.3 17.5

    Customs 1,653 1,721 1,887 2,083 8.2 10.4

    Union Excise Duties 1,758 1,702 1,855 2,298 9.0 23.9

    Service Tax 1,326 1,548 1,681 2,098 20.4 24.8

    Source: Budget documents, CRISIL Research

    Non-tax revenue collections are projected to rise from Rs.2,178 billion in 2014-15 to Rs.2,217 billion in 2015-16, growing

    by 1.8% compared with 9.5% in the last fiscal. The slowdown in non-tax revenue growth has been on a high base

    because government revenues were boosted by spectrum auctions. Non-tax revenue gains are a one-off. For

    sustainable increase in revenues, it is critical to adhere to the timeline for the roll out of Goods & Services Tax.

    This apart, government has an ambitious target of Rs.695 billion through disinvestments. But past trend suggests that

    government has always fallen short. The learning from this is that the government needs to frontload efforts and

    capitalise on the current market buoyancy. If disinvestment proceeds are similar to last year, fiscal deficit would shoot up

    to 4.2% of GDP.

    Figure 5: Disinvestment proceeds (Rs billion) have mostly trailed targets

    Source: Budget documents, CRISIL Research

    400 400

    300

    558

    634

    695

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

    Disinvestment Budgeted Disinvestment Actual

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    6

    What is the quality of fiscal consolidation?

    While expenditure on subsidies in 2014-15 at 2.1% of GDP was only marginally lower than 2.2% of GDP in 2013-14, it is

    budgeted to reduce significantly to 1.7% of GDP in 2015-16 benefiting from lower fuel subsidy bill. At the same time,

    capex would rise from 1.5% to 1.7% even though it remains below levels of the high-growth years such as 2.4% in

    2007-08. Since the quantum of revenue slippage is expected to be much lower in 2015-16, the budgetary objective of

    improving the expenditure mix, might well succeed, unlike in the last few years.

    The government has managed to achieve its fiscal deficit target of 4.1% of GDP for 2014-15 by mostly cutting

    productive expenditure (capex plus part of revenue expenditure that creates capital assets) because of lower

    revenues. Governments receipts in 2014-15 fell short by Rs 952 billion out of which the cut in productive

    expenditure was Rs 706 billion. Majority of shortfall was due to lower tax collections, which stood at Rs 9,085 billion

    compared with budgeted Rs 9,773 billion. Rest of the shortfall was in capital receipts because of lower divestments.

    Non-tax revenues, on the other hand, were a tad higher at Rs 2,178 billion compared with a budgeted Rs 2,125

    billion. Over the years, shortfall in revenue collections have led to huge cuts in productive spending. Between 2011-

    12 and 2014-15, Rs 2,555 billion was cut in productive spending because of shortfall in revenues and persuasions of

    lower-than-budgeted fiscal deficit.

    Figure 6: Axe falls on productive spending

    Source: Budget documents, CRISIL Research

    -113

    -869 -867

    -706

    -1000

    -900

    -800

    -700

    -600

    -500

    -400

    -300

    -200

    -100

    0

    FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15

    Cut in productive expenditure (Rs. Billion)

  • 7

    Figure 7: Direct benefit transfer can re-write the food subsidy script

    Direct benefit transfer, or DBT, will likely prove to be a game changer in food subsidy. We estimate that DBT could help

    the government save as much as 20% (or Rs 250 billion) in food subsidy expenditure by eliminating costs associated

    with procuring, distributing and storing foodgrains. Moreover, DBT will help bring millions of poor households that

    currently do not have access to PDS into the food subsidy net. We estimate that at fiscal 2016 prices, the cash transfers

    under the DBT will amount to almost Rs 5,800 per year for a family of five, which will implicitly raise their disposable

    income. At first glance, Rs 5,800 may seem small, but it is higher than the reported total annual expenditure (food +non-

    food) of the poorest 5% of the rural households and more than half the annual expenditure of the poorest 10% of urban

    households. Given the high marginal propensity to consume at lower income levels, such a significant unconditional cash

    transfer will undoubtedly raise discretionary spending of the recipient households, providing a consumption boost the

    economy.

    Figure 8: After 8 years, capex will exceed subsidies

    Source: Budget documents, CRISIL Research

    Will there be a boost to public investments?

    Despite improving macros, India Inc remains cautious on fresh investments. A recent CRISIL survey of 192 listed,

    private and public sector companies shows that planned capex by private companies surveyed is likely to decline in

    2015-16. A revival in investments, therefore, hinges on increased public spending, especially on infrastructure

    roads, power transmission/distribution and railways because of its significant multiplier effect of creating demand

    for steel, cement, capital goods and commercial vehicles and spurring investments in the manufacturing space as

    well.

    What has the budget done to aid public investments and infrastructure creation?

    The budget plans a 25% increase in capital expenditure in 2015-16, compared to 2.5% increase in 2014-15, taking

    its ratio in GDP up by 20 basis points to 1.7%. Central plan outlay is budgeted to increase by 35.5% in 2015-16

    compared to an average fall of 3.4% in the last three years. The budget lays focus on four sectors providing crucial

    2.4

    1.61.7

    2.0

    1.81.7 1.7

    1.5

    1.8

    1.4

    2.32.2 2.2

    2.52.6

    2.22.1

    1.7

    FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 RE FY16 BE

    Capital Expenditure (% of GDP) Major Subsidies (% of GDP)

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    8

    infrastructure - roads, railways, power and rural development.

    Focus on these sectors is important again because of the multiplier impact on output. For instance, the output

    multiplier for rail equipment is 2.7. This means one unit increase in demand for rail equipment raises overall output

    by 2.7 units. Similarly, the output multiplier for rail transport services is 1.9, while that for electricity is 2.2. The

    Economic Survey said this government can now do for the neglected railways sector what the previous NDA

    government did for rural roads. Such focus on strengthening transport infrastructure will also boost manufacturing.

    Figure 9: Sectors with higher plan outlay (%, y-o-y) Figure 10: CPSUs shoulder most capital spending

    RE: Revised estimate, BE: Budgeted estimate

    Note: Data is only for central plan outlay and taken as per Heads of Development. I.E.B.R.: Internal and extra

    budgetary resources which are raised by central PSUs through profits, loans and equity

    Source: Budget documents

    Where will the money come from?

    1. Direct spending from budget:

    The relaxation of the fiscal deficit target for 2015-16 by 30 basis points directly releases Rs 423 billion for funding

    projects. So, while total central plan outlay is budgeted higher next fiscal, much of it is due to an increase in

    budgetary support, which is 37.3% higher on a weak base.

    Road cess and taxes on petroleum products - The budget raised additional excise duty on petrol and diesel to Rs 6

    per litre from Rs 2 per litre, which is levied as road cess. This raises available funds for roads and railways to

    Rs 431 billion in 2015-16 from Rs 232 billion in 2014-15. In addition, to fund infrastructure development

    (particularly roads), the government had increased the basic excise duty on petrol and diesel by around Rs 7 to

    8 per litre between October and January. Incremental revenues accruing from this is estimated at Rs 780 billion

    in 2015-16.

    Govts revenue collections In 2015-16, the budget plans to collect divestment revenues of Rs 695 billion on

    account of stake sales and spectrum sale revenues of Rs 431 billion which can be utilised towards

    infrastructure development.

    2. Larger onus on CPSUs to raise money:

    The budget also envisages a sharp 34.1% increase in investments by central public sector enterprises (CPSUs)

    compared with a 10% drop last fiscal. Their share in total central plan outlay is thus budgeted at nearly 55%. To fund

    this, CPSUs will have to raise resources from the bond market. Of the total estimated to be raised in 2015-16, nearly

    -10.6

    -30.6

    11.17.3

    174.5

    66.553.0

    15.5

    Roads and Bridges

    Rural Development

    Railways Power

    %, y-o-y

    FY12 to FY15 average FY16 B.E.

    60.6 61.156.4

    44.5 45.0

    39.4 38.943.6

    55.555.0

    2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 RE 2015-16 BE

    % share in total capital outlay

    Budget support I.E.B.R.

  • 9

    37.1% is to come from accruals (down to 49% from last year), 37% from capital market (up from 26%) and 26% from

    external commercial borrowings and other sources. From the bond markets, PSUs in the roads and railways sector

    are together slated to borrow Rs 803 billion in 2015-16 compared with Rs 208 billion last year. The budget allows for

    a large part of this borrowing to be in the form of tax-free bonds.

    3. Crowding in private investment

    Public investment in infrastructure (especially railways and roads) can create large complementarities for private

    sector investments. In addition to increased spending, the budget also takes a few other measures to boost

    infrastructure investments.

    On infrastructure financing, the budget announced the setting up of a National Investment and Infrastructure Fund

    (NIIF) where an annual budgetary flow of Rs 200 billion will be ensured. This will enable it to raise debt and further

    invest as equity in infrastructure finance companies such as IRFC and NHB. The budget also proposed to permit

    tax-free infrastructure bonds for roads and railway sectors where large investments are being planned. The budget

    reiterates the governments intention to revisit the private-public-partnership.

    Overall, despite the pressure on fiscal consolidation, the budget has managed to create room for infrastructure

    spending through a mix of its own resources as well as by nudging CPSUs to invest more. However, though there is

    an increase in resources available for funding infrastructure, the governments implementation capacity to ensure

    efficient delivery remains a concern. This, therefore, should be the next area of focus for the government.

    How fiscal federalism is an enabler

    It is well understood that greater power to states is essential for local capacity building and efficient use of resources.

    This power emanates through higher resources and flexibility in utilising these resources at the state level. The

    government has taken steps in the right direction in this regard in the current budget. Total transfers as a percentage of

    GDP from the centre to the states have increased from 4.5% in 2013-14, 5.5% in 2014-15 to 6.0% in 2015-16.

    Figure 11: Increasing fiscal flexibility for states

    2014-15 2015-16 Change in Flexibility

    Total transfers % of GDP 5.5 6.0

    Rs billion

    Total Transfers 6,930 8,522

    States Revenue share 3,378 5,240 Fully flexible/Untied

    Central Assistance for State and UT plans 2,703 1,958 Restructured to make semi - flexible :

    23 schemes fully supported by union,

    13 supported on sharing pattern and 8

    delinked from the union

    Centrally Sponsored Schemes 46 239 Inflexible/tied

    Non - Plan grants and loans 803 1,086

    Note : Total transfers include grants and loans under the central assistance for state and UT plans, non -plan

    grants and loans, revenue share of states and centrally sponsered scheme transfers.

    Source: Budget documents, Crisil Research

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    10

    Budget implements Fourteenth Finance Commissions (FFC) recommendation

    Greater resources for states

    The Budget has raised states share in total divisible pool of tax revenues to 42% from 32% as per the recommendation

    of the FCC, recording the biggest-ever increase in vertical tax devolution. In level terms, states share of the divisible

    pool will rise to Rs 5.24 trillion in 2015-16 twice the share in 2011-12 from Rs 3.38 trillion in 2014-15. This money

    will help states design, implement and finance programmes according to their specific needs. In addition, higher tax

    devolution will also imply that any buoyancy in tax collections will benefit states to a greater extent as compared to

    previous years.

    Transfers under centrally sponsered schemes have risen

    In order to ensure that the fiscal situation of the center remains preserved, with increasing transfers from the divisible

    pool the central assistance to states has seen a decline. The total central assistance for State and UT plans has

    moderated from Rs 2.7 trillion in 2014-15 to Rs 2 trillion in 2015-16. On the flipside, even as the centres position is

    squeezed with higher devolution, the transfers under centrally sponsered schemes has risen substantially to Rs 239

    bilion from Rs 46 billion in 2014-15. Allocations as per schemes has risen under MGNREGA ( rose by Rs 12 billion) and

    in sectors such as agriculture, education, health, and rural infrastructure including roads.

    But flexibility of transfers has also increased

    Past data suggests that above 50% of the divisible pool is given to the states but a major portion of this goes under tied

    or conditional transfers. In the last few years, plan transfers have moved away from the Gadgil formula to more

    discretionary transfers resulting in lower flexibility. These are the conditional or tied transfers. As per the

    recommendation of the FFC, the central assistance to state and UT plans has been restructured.The budget has

    announced a changed sharing pattern between the centre and the state in terms of scheme implementation and

    financing. The budget also proposes 8 centrally sponsered schemes (CSS) to be de-linked from the support of the centre

    and 13 schemes ( for example, Urban Rejuvenation Mission 500, Development of 100 smart cities etc) to be run in a

    sharing pattern between the centre and states. Details of the sharing pattern are yet to be disclosed.

    Implementing capacity of states now needs attention

    With an increase in fiscal flexibility of the states also comes the question of capability of the states to invest these

    resources. In the past, states have not fully utilised the fiscal resources available to them resulting in insufficient capital

    expenditure. Capital expenditure as a % of GDP has fallen from 2.8% in 2008-09 to 2.2% in 2012-13. As, recommended

    by the FFC, the absorptive capacity of states needs to be enhanced to raise capital expenditure and boost growth.

    Other measures at fiscal federalism

    The government since June has also announced other changes that will result in greater benefit for states. One such

    change is the revenue sharing on natural resources auctions. The auctions of 204 coal blocks a corrective measure

    after the coal scandal will benefit state finances. So far, 18 blocks have been auctioned and will help raise over Rs 1

    trillion over the next 30 years in states such as Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and

    West Bengal. This will contribute towards states fiscal resources.

  • 11

    Overall, this budget showcased a strong resolve towards encouraging cooperative federalism in India. That said, certain

    sections of the transfers continue to be tied/conditional. Therefore, continued steps towards increased federalism will be

    needed in the coming years. In addition, the ball is in the states court now and they need to use these resources

    judiciously to enhance growth.

    How will the budget boost manufacturing?

    Manufacturing sector is a private sector enterprise with over 90% of the investments and output generated in the private

    sector. Government can play a facilitative role in improving its prospects. The budget has taken many small steps to

    support the manufacturing sector through indirect channels.

    Support through forward and backward linkages : The government has taken measures to boost the

    manufacturing sector by improving the domestic investment environment and raising the spending on physical

    infrastructure which complements manufacturing activity. Spending on rail, road and ports will crowd in private

    investment and support manufacturing activity via backward and forward linkages.

    Improvement in ease of doing business: The above will be complemented by efforts to improve the ease of doing

    business in India - its current rank is 142 out of 189 countries. Towards this regard, the budget announced reforms

    in bankruptcy law to bring about legal certainity and speediness.

    Reduction in custom and excise duty to support Make in India : The budget supports the Make in India

    initiative through reduction in custom duty on certain inputs to address the problem of duty inversion and reduce the

    cost of raw materials.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    12

    This Page is Intentially Left Blank

  • Industry

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    14

    Overall sectoral impact

    There are five focus areas in the Union Budget and each will impact India Inc. Heres a look at how:

    Enabling financial sector efficiencies: Setting up of autonomous bank board bureau marks the initial move

    towards formalising a holding company structure for public sector banks. This will improve governance, optimise

    capital contribution by government, and provide greater functional autonomy. Along with more stringent bankruptcy

    laws, these are two key long-term positives. On the other hand, providing a mere Rs.79 bn towards capital support

    for public sector banks is grossly inadequate. Elsewhere, the inclusion of NBFCs under the purview of SARFAESI

    Act, along with the new bankruptcy code will improve recovery efforts for financial institutions and support their

    capital position. The new Micro Units Development Refinance Agency (MUDRA) Bank for refinancing of

    microfinance institutions will support micro credit. Proposals to promote financial savings are also a positive.

    Enabling infrastructure investments: The intent to ratchet up public spending on infrastructure is clearly visible.

    There is a sharp increase in allocation to roads, railways and rural infrastructure development. In addition, many

    significant steps have been taken to improve the availability of funds for infrastructure. This includes higher

    allocation for road cess, more funding through the National Infrastructure Investment Fund, tax-free bonds and

    rationalisation of taxes for infrastructure investment trusts. However, timely implementation of projects remains a

    key concern. The governments intent to salvage the broken public-private partnership model to attract investment is

    also a positive. The deferment of GAAR and allowing foreign capital in alternative investment funds will attract

    foreign capital.

    Boosting power and renewable energy: The government has set an aggressive target for renewable energy of

    close to 175 GW, including 100 GW of solar capacity by 2022. It has also announced five new UMPPs for

    conventional power -- with all approvals in place to ensure faster execution. But the key concerns remain timely

    implementation, resolution on fuel availability, clearances, transmission corridor availability and financial health of

    distribution companies. The government continues increasing allocation towards transmission and distribution its

    up 26% in 2015-16 compared with the current fiscal. Coal cess has also been increased a touch, which will

    marginally lift tariffs. We expect generators to pass it on.

    Marginal changes in taxes: The budget has proposed a marginal increase in excise duty from 12.36% to 12.5%

    and in service tax from 12.36% to 14%. However, given the decline in input prices (both food and non-food), we

    expect companies (manufacturers or service providers) to largely pass on the burden to customers and protect their

    margins. Although surcharge on corporate tax has been increased for this fiscal, paving a structural path towards

    lower rates by doing away with many exemptions is a positive.

    Leg-up to rural income: With increased allocation to MGNREGA, rural incomes should rise. Add a good monsoon

    and what you get is greater consumption of FMCG products and higher sales of consumer durables and two-

    wheelers. Increased agricultural credit would also lead to higher sales of tractors and irrigation equipment. Better

    volume growth and softer commodity prices will improve the margins of companies in this arena.

  • 15

    Industry Impact

    Automobiles: Marginally positive for tractors, neutral for other segments Neutral

    Key budget proposals:

    Farm credit target increased by Rs 500 billion to Rs 8.5 trillion. Higher allocation to rural financing agencies such as

    NABARD and RRBs, and to initiatives such as MGNREGA, micro-irrigation watershed programs, etc.

    Allocation of Rs 750 million to promote manufacturing of electric vehicles (EVs). Concessional customs and excise

    duties on hybrid and EV parts extended until March 2016.

    Increase in customs duty on fully-built commercial vehicles (CVs) from 10% to 20%. Reduction in excise duty on

    ambulance chassis from 24% to 12.5%.

    Tax on royalty payments to foreign companies reduced to 10% from 25%.

    Creation of a trade receivables discounting platform for medium and small enterprises (MSMEs).

    CRISIL Researchs View

    The increase in allocation to farm credit and rural schemes is likely to be favourable for tractor sales. Proposals on

    electric and hybrid vehicle parts will not materially impact the sector given low population of vehicles in India (less than

    1% share). The proposals will have a limited impact on the CV segment as imports of fully built CVs and sales of

    ambulances comprise a small proportion of the CV industry. The reduction in tax on royalty payments to foreign

    companies will be marginally positive for Indian companies who import technology. Creation of an electronic platform for

    facilitating financing of trade receivables of MSMEs will help improve liquidity of auto component manufacturers.

    Cement: Higher spending on infrastructure to benefit in the medium term Positive

    Key budget proposals:

    Investments outlined under various infrastructure schemes related to areas such as roads, urban development and

    irrigation indicate a targeted government spending of Rs 1,080 billion in 2015-16.

    Duties and tariffs directly levied on cement have increased marginally. The effective excise duty on cement has

    increased marginally from 12.4% + Rs 120 per tonne to 12.5% + Rs 125 per tonne.

    The clean energy cess on coal (domestic and imported) has been hiked to Rs 200 per tonne from Rs 100 per tonne.

    The rail freight rate for cement has been increased by 2.7% and for coal by 6.3%.

    CRISIL Researchs View

    The governments focus on infrastructure is evident with the total targetted spending in 2015-16 almost double the

    revised estimates of 2014-15. This should result in a sustained recovery in demand, but the execution capability of

    funding institutions/players has to be scaled up appropriately. Further, the rise in duties and tariffs is expected to have a

    muted impact on total cost, which is expected to increase 0.8%. Power and fuel cost (~20% of cost of sales) will increase

    2%. Freight cost, which accounts for 25-30% of cost of sales, will increase 1% with the rise in freight rates. However,

    amid rising demand, players will be able to offset it with a rise in prices.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    16

    Consumer goods: Little to savour Neutral

    Key budget proposals:

    Basic customs duty on organic LED (OLED) panels removed.

    Specific excise duty on tobacco and tobacco products increased 15-25%.

    Excise duty of 2% without CENVAT credit or 6% with CENVAT credit levied on condensed milk and peanut butter.

    Basic excise duty increased to 18% from 12% on mineral water and aerated water containing added sugar or other

    sweeteners/flavours. Additional excise duty of 5% on the products exempted.

    Excise duty on leather footwear with retail price exceeding Rs 1,000 per pair halved to 6%.

    CRISIL Researchs View

    Improvement in rural income, owing to increase in MNREGA allocation, to support consumer durable and FMCG sales.

    Removal in customs duty on OLED to only marginally affect OLED TV sales as segment accounts for less than 0.5% of

    panel TV sales. The excise duty hike will hurt the demand for tobacco-based products, but aerated beverages demand

    will only be marginally impacted.

    Financials: Setting up of holding company and bankruptcy code a positive Positive

    Key budget proposals:

    The Union Budget has proposed to provide Rs 79.4 billion as capital support to all public sector banks (PSBs) in

    2015-16.

    NBFCs registered with RBI, having an asset size of Rs 5,000 million and above, may be considered for notification

    as 'Financial Institution' under the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

    Autonomous Bank Board Bureau and bank holding company to be set up to improve governance of public sector

    banks.

    Micro Units Development Refinance Agency (MUDRA) Bank, with a corpus of Rs 200 billion and credit guarantee

    corpus of Rs 30 billion, to be created.

    MUDRA Bank will be responsible for refinancing all microfinance Institutions, which lend to small entities, and

    focusing on scheduled caste/ scheduled tribe entrepreneurs.

    CRISIL Researchs View

    Allocation of funds (an average of Rs 111 billion has been infused over the past three years till 2014-15) for capitalising

    PSBs seems inadequate, given the high capital requirements to meet Basel 3 commitments. In this context, the proposal

    to create a holding and investment company and an Autonomous Bank Board Bureau would be a positive and improve

    autonomy for PSBs and help them raise funds, as the holding company too can leverage.

    Allowing NBFCs recourse to SARFAESI Act will help smoothen the asset recovery process. This, coupled with

    establishment of the Bankruptcy Code would help improve asset quality within the banking and financial services

    industry.

    Setting up of MUDRA bank will help improve availability of funds for small business entrepreneurs.

  • 17

    Infrastructure: Investment boost through higher public funding Positive

    Key Budget Proposals:

    Budgetary allocation: Total outlay for infrastructure has been increased by 1.5 times to Rs 2.8 trillion (roads,

    railways and urban infrastructure the biggest beneficiaries).

    Roads: Investments for development of national highways proposed to be hiked by 178% y-o-y to Rs 85,607 crore.

    A major portion of this increase will be funded by a Rs 4 per litre increase in road cess on petrol and diesel.

    Railways: Total outlay raised by 52% to Rs 1,000.11 billion. In the Railway Budget 2015-16, there have been many

    announcements of PPP projects in areas of coastal connectivity, gauge conversion, dedicated freight corridors

    (DFCs) and the Mumbai suburban rail.

    Airports & Ports: No new project announcements. Exemption on service tax for constructing airports and ports has

    been withdrawn.

    Funding availability: A Rs 200 billion National Investment and Infrastructure Fund to be set up for infrastructure

    finance companies to raise debt. The budget also provides for issuance of tax-free bonds for roads, railways and

    irrigation projects, and aims to rationalise the tax regime for Infrastructure Investment Trusts.

    Other measures: The government's intent to table a Public Contracts (Settlement of Disputes) Bill will help speedy

    redressal of disputes in large public projects and create a conducive environment for PPP projects.

    CRISIL Researchs View

    At a time when private sector interest in infrastructure development is low, the increase in budgetary support holds the

    potential to kick-start capital investments in the economy. Moreover, the significant increase in public funding for the

    roads sector has the potential to boost execution of national highway projects by about 5,800 km annually and create a

    robust construction opportunity for road engineering procurement & construction (EPC) companies.

    The National Investment and Infrastructure Fund will create additional funding resources for private developers, over and

    above the rise proposed in public funding. Moreover, rationalisation of tax regime for Infrastructure Investment Trusts

    may help free up private capital currently locked in completed projects.

    While the budget provisions are positive, it puts the execution capability of implementing agencies such as the National

    Highways Authority of India (NHAI) at test. Addressing on-ground issues such as clearances and land acquisition

    becomes extremely critical to ensure a sharp increase in project execution.

    Metals: No big announcement Neutral

    Key budget proposals:

    Basic excise duty increased to 12.5% from 12.36%.

    Clean energy cess on coal doubled to Rs 200 per tonne.

    Basic customs duty on metallurgical coke raised to 5% from 2.5%.

    Special additional duty on iron and steel scrap reduced to 2% from 4%.

    CRISIL Researchs View

    The thrust on infrastructure is a long term positive. But in the near term, the budget proposals will have negligible impact

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    18

    on the sector. Increase in basic excise duty will only slightly raise aluminium and steel prices by Rs 200 and Rs 50 per

    tonne, respectively. Hike in clean energy cess will also have only a mild impact on sponge iron and aluminium players.

    Similarly, impact of hike in customs duty on metallurgical coke will be negligible as most Indian steel players import

    coking coal and subsequently convert it into coke.

    Oil & gas: Higher Govt share in under-recovery burden for 2015-16: positive for oil companies Positive

    Key budget proposals:

    Government announces oil subsidy of Rs 300 billion for 2015-16.

    Change in excise duty structure on petrol and diesel: Reduction in CENVAT by Rs 3.5-3.7 per litre, increase in road

    cess by Rs 4 per litre, removal of 3 per cent education cess levied on overall excise duty

    Exemption of special additional customs duty on petrol and diesel, in excess of Rs 6 per litre

    CRISIL Researchs View

    The overall impact is marginally positive. The government's estimate of oil subsidies in 2014-15 and 2015-16 will wipe

    out the subsidy rollover of Rs 90-100 billion from 2014-15, reducing working capital requirements of oil marketing

    companies. With the government contributing Rs 300 billion towards fuel subsidies (including rollover), upstream oil

    companies will see a 5% decline in their contribution to under-recoveries in 2015-16.

    Increase in road cess on petrol and diesel has been completely offset by the decline in basic excise duty and removal of

    education cess. Hence, there will be no impact.

    As petrol and diesel imports are marginal, exemption in special additional customs duty will not have any major impact.

    Power: Higher budgetary allocations and fund availability to boost investments Positive

    Key budget proposals:

    Capacity additions: Installed capacity target for renewable energy set at 175 GW, led by additions of 100 GW of

    solar power capacity by 2022. Setting up of five ultra-mega power plants (UMPPs), each of 4,000 MW, with pre-

    awarded clearances and fuel linkages envisaged.

    Budgetary allocation: Allocation to transmission & distribution (T&D) segment increased by 26% to Rs 63.5 billion .

    Funding to renewable energy sector has also been increased by 5% to Rs 61.6 billion.

    Funding availability: Rs 200 billion National Investment and Infrastructure Fund to be set up for help infrastructure

    finance companies to raise debt.

    Duties and levies: Clean energy cess on coal doubled to Rs 200 per tonne in 2015-16; however, the rise in

    generation cost of Rs 0.06/unit to be largely passed through. Moreover, steps have been taken to correct the

    inverted duty structure in renewable energy for selected components. However, the overall impact on capital costs is

    less than 5%.

    Dispute redressal: Public Contracts Bill introduced for resolving contractual disputes to create a conducive

    environment for PPP projects

    Other benefits: Additional depreciation of 20% granted to new plant and machinery installed by a manufacturing unit

    or a unit engaged in generation and distribution of power.

    CRISIL Researchs View

    The budget provides a thrust on investments in the power and renewable energy space, with a 16% y-o-y increase in

  • 19

    planned expenditure. We believe that a healthy growth in capacity additions and augmentation of T&D infrastructure will

    reduce power deficit to about 1% by 2018-19. However, a favourable regulatory framework coupled with states

    facilitating implementation of projects will be critical to boost investments.

    While the provisions are positive, addressing fuel availability issues and improving the financial health of state distribution

    companies is important to alleviate financial stress in the sector

    Real Estate: Commercial real estate developers to benefit in the medium term Neutral

    Key budget proposals:

    Rationalisation of capital gains tax for the sponsors at the time of listing of real estate investment trusts (REITs).

    Service tax increased from 12.36% to 14%.

    CRISIL Researchs View

    Rationalisation of capital gains tax for the sponsors* exiting at the time of listing of REITs is positive for developers with a

    significant exposure to rental yielding real estate assets. The increase in service tax will be marginally negative for the

    real estate sector.

    *As per the Securities Exchange Board of India, sponsor has been defined as any person(s) who set(s) up the REIT and

    designated as such at thetime of application made to the Board

    Textiles: Allocation under TUFS slightly reduced; No major impact Neutral

    Key budget proposals:

    Budgetary allocation under the Technology upgradation Funds Scheme (TUFS) has been reduced to Rs 15.2 billion

    for 2015-16 from Rs 18.6 billion in 2014-15.

    CRISIL Researchs View

    The government has been supporting the industry through TUFS, which enables players to expand/ modernise at lower

    costs. Though the budgetary allocation under TUFS has been reduced slightly in 2015-16, it will not greatly impact the

    industry given the existing demand-supply dynamics. Continuation of a zero excise duty will aid a 6-8% rise in domestic

    sales volumes of apparels in 2015-16, vis-a-vis a 5-6% rise in 2014-15.

    Technology, Media & Telecom: No significant impact of the Budget proposals Neutral

    Key budget proposals:

    Mobile handsets: Excise duty on mobile handsets (costing above Rs 2,000) hiked from 6% (with CENVAT credit) to

    12.5%.

    Service tax: Service tax, hiked from 12.36% to 14%, will have a bearing on the bills of postpaid telecom

    subscribers.

    Telecom receipts: Budgeted receipts from spectrum auctions, one-time spectrum charges and other levies have

    been estimated at Rs 429 billion for 2015-16, vis-a-vis Rs 432 billion for 2014-15.

    Media: Service tax to be levied on tickets purchased for events such as concerts, pageants, sporting events and

    award functions, if the admission amount exceeds Rs 500 per person.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    20

    IT: Rs 10 billion has been allocated towards the Techno-Financial Incubation and Facilitation Programme for

    technology start-ups and self-employment activities. Also, input components used in manufacturing tablet computers

    have been exempted from basic customs duty, countervailing duty (CVD) and special additional duty (SAD).

    CRISIL Researchs View

    The proposals are unlikely to have a significant impact on the telecom and media sectors. The hike in excise duty on

    mobile handsets would result in an increase in their prices, which would somewhat impact the rate of growth in

    smartphone adoption. The hike in the service tax rate would inflate the bills of postpaid subscribers, who, however,

    constitute only about 5 per cent of Indias wireless subscriber base. The budgeted receipts from telecom services

    indicate that another round of spectrum auctions can be expected in 2015-16.

    Service tax to be levied on event ticket prices exceeding Rs 500 is unlikely to have a major impact as organisers would

    pass on the resultant price hikes to the ticket buyers.

    The proposals will not have a significant impact on the IT industry. Allocation of funds for start-ups will help the IT

    industry adopt new technologies and provide employment opportunities. Tablet computer prices are set to reduce with

    the removal of custom duties.

  • Capital markets

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    22

    Capital markets Focus on social security a good augury for future

    A. Enhancing coverage of pension and health insurance:

    With an aim to expand pension and insurance coverage in India, Arun Jaitleys Budget seeks to include the

    unorganized and the under-privileged. As per CRISIL estimates, about 65% of the old age population in India is not

    covered by social security.

    Increase in deduction (by Rs 50,000) under Section 80C for contributions to pension funds and National Pension

    System (NPS), and under Section 80CCC for pension funds launched by insurance companies is expected to boost

    interest in these products. An additional tax deduction of Rs 50,000 has also been provided for contribution to the

    NPS under Section 80CCD.

    Increase in tax incentives for health insurance is expected to enhance the coverage of health insurance products.

    The budget has increased the available choices in pension and health insurance. Subscribers can plan for

    retirement by choosing between asset classes and products offered by the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) and

    the NPS. Likewise, products recognised by the Insurance and Regulatory Development Authority of India (IRDA) for

    health cover are an option to Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC). These measures are expected to

    encourage healthy competition in the insurance and pension funds sectors.

    B. Funding infrastructure through alternative investment funds

    The budget includes key measures to enhance investor interest in alternative investment funds (AIFs). Increased

    asset flow to AIFs, especially Category I and II AIFs, will boost funding options for the infrastructure and real estate

    sectors.

    The introduction of pass-through status for taxation of Category I and II AIFs allows for tax to be levied on the

    investors (unit holders) of these funds and not on the funds. This is expected to increase investor interest in these

    funds.

    Opening of AIFs to foreign investors will enhance the investor base for AIFs. This is expected to boost inflows and

    energise start-ups and projects that may otherwise face difficulties in funding. Details are, however, awaited on the

    tax implications for such foreign investments.

    C. Channelling physical gold savings to financial savings

    India is amongst the largest consumers of gold. Gold investments are predominantly held in a physical form, which

    means the investment once made is not used productively. Further, the huge demand for gold increases Indias gold

    imports, which adversely impacts the balance of payment and the rupee. The budget seeks to introduce schemes

    such as Gold Monetising Scheme, Indian Gold Coin and Sovereign Gold Bonds, which address these concerns.

    While these are steps in the right direction, the efficacy of the schemes - given the countrys penchant for physical

    holdings - remains to be seen.

  • 23

    D. New agency for government borrowings, yet very few measures for deepening debt market

    The proposal to establish a Public Debt Management Agency for government borrowings is expected to facilitate

    better planning and management of domestic and foreign market borrowings for the Centre. This will also reduce the

    operational burden on the Reserve Bank of India and help it focus on core functions related to monetary policies.

    Introduction of tax-free infrastructure bonds will help channnelise investments to the bond market. While provisions

    for pension funds and AIFs are also likely to have a positive impact on asset flow to the debt markets, given the role

    that the debt markets have to play in the realisation of several of the measures that have been announced in the

    Budget, there is very little to cheer. No concrete measures have been announced for deepening or broadening the

    markets.

    E. Encouraging foreign investments

    Continuation of the withholding tax rate of 5% and deferment in applicability of the GAAR are likely to maintain the

    positive atmosphere for foreign investors. Modification to norms of Permanent Establishments (PE) and

    rationalisation in Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) are also positive. Details are awaited on the removal in distinction

    between Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) and Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs).

    F. Very little for the mutual fund industry

    The mutual fund industry could have done with a few more measures. Given the fact that mutual funds are expected

    to be a key vehicle to channelise retail savings, this is a negative.

    The only positive for the industry has been the proposal to provide tax neutrality on transfer of units in case of

    mergers of schemes. This will enable mutual funds to consolidate similar schemes, which is important to retain

    simplicity of products for retail investors.

    Introduction of service tax for mutual fund distributors is likely to reduce the margins on distribution of schemes.

    Given the challenges the industry faces with distribution, this is a negative. Increase in surcharge from 10-12% for

    capital gains and distributed income will increase the effective tax rates for investors and may, in turn, impact

    investor interest.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    This Page is Intentially Left Blank

  • Annexure: Sector wise Impact

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    26

    Airport Infrastructure

    Increase in service tax to marginally impact non-aero revenues

    Company Impact Impact factors

    GMR Infrastructure Ltd A,B

    GVK Power and Infrastructure Ltd A,B

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. Increase in service tax to 14% from 12.36% to marginally affect airports non-aero revenues. Non-aero revenues

    constitute 30-40% of total revenues for Mumbai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Delhi airports.

    B. Improved funding availability through establishment of National Investment and Infrastructure Fund and

    rationalisation of taxes for Infrastructure Investment Trust.

    C. Service tax exemption on construction of airports has been withdrawn. Accordingly, service tax (including education

    cess) of 14% is applicable. Greenfield airports will be largely affected as these comprise about 77% share of total

    investments over next 5 years.

  • 27

    Auto components & tyres

    No significant impact of the Budget

    Company Impact Impact factors

    Apollo Tyres -

    Exide A

    Motherson Sumi A

    Bosch -

    Bharat Forge A

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. We do not expect concessional customs and excise duty rates (6%) on specified parts of electrically operated and

    hybrid vehicles to have a major impact as sales of electric vehicles are very low.

    Auto parts: Tariffs

    (per cent)

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15* 2015-16

    Engine and engine parts 7.7 7.7 12.4 12.5

    Drive transmission, steering, suspension,

    braking parts,silencer, exhaust pipes and

    radiators

    10.3 10.3 12.4 12.5

    Electrical parts 7.7 7.7 12.4 12.5

    Raw materials for auto components1 7.7 7.7 12.4 12.5

    Excise duty includes education cess @ 3% (not applicable on 12.5% rate in 2015-16)

    * Effective from 01/01/2015

    Notes:

    1) Raw materials for auto components include galvanised plate (GP)/galvanised coil (GC) steel,

    hot rolled (HR), steel, aluminium, copper and lead.

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Customs Excise

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    28

    Tyres: Tariffs, prices and landed costs

    International Pre-budget Post-budget

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 ($/tonne)

    New tyres 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 - - - -

    Used/retreaded tyres

    Truck and bus 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 - - - -

    Car cross ply/ Radials 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 - - - -

    Raw materials for tyres

    Natural rubber (Note 2) (Note 2) (Note 1) (Note 1) 127,446 1,703 143,063 143,063

    SBR (1502) 10.3 10.3 12.4 12.5 n.a. 1,338 91,800 91,800

    PBR (1220) 10.3 10.3 12.4 12.5 106,000 1,500 105,381 105,381

    NTC fabric 10.3 10.3 12.4 12.5 n.a. 3,665 251,548 251,548

    Carbon black (N330) 5.2 5.2 12.4 12.5 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

    NTC: Nylon tyre cord; PBR: Polybutadiene rubber; SBR: Styrene butadiene rubber

    n.a.: Not available

    * Domestic carbon black prices are available on quarterly basis. Included prices are for Q4 2014-15.

    Notes

    1) For natural rubber, there is a cess of Rs 2 per kg in lieu of excise duty w ith effect from September 1, 2011.

    2) Customs duty on natural rubber w ill be charged at 20% or Rs 30 per kg, w hichever is low er, w .e.f. December 20, 2013.

    3) New tyres include the follow ing categories: Truck and bus, light truck, car (cross ply and radial), tractor front,

    tractor rear, tractor trailor, moped, scooter and motorcycle.

    4) An additional countervailing duty of 4% is levied on raw materials except for NTCF

    5) Prices and landed cost are average rates for January 2015.

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Domestic

    Prices (January 2015) Landed costs (Rs/tonne)Tariffs (per cent)

    (Rs/tonne)

    Customs Excise

  • 29

    Automobiles

    Marginally positive for tractors; neutral for other segments

    Company Impact Impact factors

    Maruti Suzuki India Ltd B,D

    Tata Motors Ltd A,B

    Ashok Leyland Ltd A,B

    Bajaj Auto Ltd -

    Hero Motocorp Ltd C,D,F

    Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd A,B,C,E,F

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. Increase in effective rate of customs duty on import of fully-built commercial vehicles (CV) to 20% from 10% will not

    have a significant impact as fully-built CV imports are negligible.

    B. Reduction in excise duty on ambulance chassis to 12.5% from 24% will not have a major impact on CV sales as

    they form a small proportion of total sales.

    C. Concessional customs and excise duty rates (6%) on specified parts of electrically operated and hybrid vehicles are

    not expected to have a major impact as sales of electric vehicles are very low.

    D. Reduction in tax on royalty payments to foreign companies to 10% from 25% will have a marginally positive impact

    for Indian companies who import techonolgy.

    E. The increase in funds allocated for farm credit by Rs 500 bn to Rs 8.5 trillion and agricultural initiatives such as

    increase in allocation to MGNREGA and NABARD will be marginally favourable for tractor sales.

    F. Allocation of Rs 750 million to promote manufacturing of electric vehicles (EVs) is another directionally positive step

    but will not have much impact in the near term.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    30

    Automobiles: Tariffs

    (%)

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15* 2015-16

    New cars

    -Completely knocked dow n units (CKD) 10.3 10.3 - -

    -Semi-knocked dow n units (SKD) 61.8 61.8 - -

    -Completely built units (CBU) 128.8 128.8 - -

    -Specif ied small cars1 - - 12.4 12.5

    -Other than specif ied small cars2 - - 24.7 24.7

    Utility vehicles (less than 1500 cc) 128.8 128.8 24.7 24.7

    SUVs (including utility vehicles exceeding 1500 cc and length 128.8 128.8 - -

    exceeding 4000 mm, ground clearance of 170 mm and more) - - 30.9 30.9

    Tw o-w heelers 10.3 10.3 12.4 12.5

    Trucks (LCVs and MHCVs)3 10.3 20.6 12.4 12.5

    Buses (LCVs and MHCVs)3 10.3 20.6 12.4 12.5

    Tractors 10.3 10.3 - -

    Engine and engine parts 7.7 7.7 12.4 12.5

    Drive transmission, steering, suspension, braking

    parts,silencer, exhaust pipes and radiators 10.3 10.3 12.4 12.5

    Electrical parts 7.7 7.7 12.4 12.5

    Steel items 7.7 7.7 12.4 12.5

    Pig iron 5.2 5.2 12.4 12.5

    Excise duty includes education cess @ 3% (not applicable on 12.5% rate in 2015-16)

    LCV: Light commercial vehicles; MHCV: Medium and heavy commercial vehicles

    Notes:

    * Effective from 01/01/2015

    1 Specif ied small cars include cars w ith length not exceeding 4000 mm and engine

    capacity not exceeding 1200 cc for petrol cars and 1500 cc for diesel cars.

    2 Others w ill include cars w ith length exceeding 4000 mm and

    engine capacity exceeding 1200 cc for petrol cars and 1500 cc for diesel cars.

    3 Represents effective rate for fully-built vehicles. Customs duty on commercial vehicles in

    CKD kits w ill continue to be at 10%

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Customs Excise

  • 31

    Banking

    Positive for NBFCs and PSBs

    Company Impact Impact factors

    State Bank of India A,C

    Punjab National Bank A,C

    ICICI Bank A

    HDFC Bank A

    HDFC Ltd B

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. The Union Budget has proposed to provide Rs 79.4 billion as capital support to all PSBs (PSBs) in 2015-16, lower

    than the average Rs 131 billion provided in the past five years till 2014-15. This cut in allocation has come at a time

    when PSBs are witnessing significant pressure on profitability and need to comply with stringent Basel III capital

    requirements. To support credit growth of 15-16% in 2015-16, PSBs will need much more capital than the levels

    budgeted for. Weaker banks with a lower capital adequacy, would be impacted the most if the required capital

    infusion does not occur.

    B. In this context, the governments intention to create a holding and investment company and an Autonomous Bank

    Board Bureau for PSBs is a positive. This would provide autonomy to banks and help them raise funds. The bureau,

    a precursor to the holding company, will search and select heads of PSBs and help them develop differentiated

    strategies and capital raising plans through innovative financial methods and instruments. This step is in the right

    direction as it will improve operating efficiency of PSBs.

    C. NBFCs registered with RBI and having an asset size of Rs 5,000 million and above, would now be covered under

    the SARFAESI Act, 2000. This, coupled with formulation of a new Bankruptcy Code, would help the banking and

    financial sector manage their asset quality better.

    D. Establishment of the Micro Units Development Refinance Agency (MUDRA) Bank, with a corpus of Rs 200 billion,

    and credit guarantee corpus of Rs 30 billion has been proposed. MUDRA Bank will be responsible for refinancing all

    microfinance Institutions, which lend to small business units through the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana. A Trade

    Receivables discounting System (TReDS) - an electronic platform for facilitating financing of trade receivables of

    MSMEs is proposed to be established, which will help ease liquidity for companies.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    32

    Cement

    Measures to boost construction activity a positive; cost escalations minor

    Company Impact Impact factors

    ACC Ltd. B

    Ambuja Cements Ltd. B

    India Cements Ltd. B

    Shree Cement Ltd. B

    UltraTech Cement Ltd. B

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. Duties and tariffs directly levied on cement hiked marginally. An increase in freight, power and fuel costs to drive up

    players operating costs by 0.8%. However, they will be able to hike prices to offset this increase owing to rising

    demand.

    B. Clean energy cess on coal (domestic and imported) doubled to Rs 200 per tonne, which will increase power and fuel

    costs (that form about 20% of cost of sales) by 2%.

    C. Rail freight rate for cement hiked by 2.7% and for coal by 6.3%. This would drive up freight costs (which account for

    25-30% of cost of sales) by 1%.

    D. Increase in infrastructure funding to aid recovery. Key outlays are:

    E. Investments towards roads and highways more than doubled to about Rs 856 billion.

    F. Outlay towards urban infrastructure increased by 37% to Rs 188 billion.

    G. The above moves would improve demand for cement over the medium term; however execution capability of

    funding institutions/ players has to be scaled up appropriately. Further, steps taken to improve access to financing

    for infrastructure projects could aid higher credit offtake over the long term.

    Cement: Tariffs

    (Per cent)

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16

    Portland cement 0 0 12.4 +Rs120/tonne 12.5 +Rs125/tonne 0 0

    White cement 10.3 10.3 12.4 12.5 30 30

    Cement clinker 10.3 10.3 12.4 12.5 0 0

    Limestone 5.2 5.2 0 0 0 0

    Gypsum 2.6 2.6 0 0 0 0

    Pet coke 2.5 2.5 14.4 14.4 0 0

    Imported coal 2.5% BD+2.0% CVD 2.5% BD+2.0% CVD 0 0 0 0

    BD: Basic duty; CVD: Counter veiling duty

    Customs Excise Abatement rate

    Source: CRISIL Research

  • 33

    Construction

    Public funding to propel construction investments

    Company Impact Impact Factors

    Larsen & Toubro Ltd A,B,C,D,E,F

    Hindustan Construction Co Ltd A,B,D,E,F

    IVRCL Ltd A,B,C,D,E,F

    Nagarjuna Construction Co Ltd A,B,C,D,E,F

    Simplex Infrstructures Ltd A,B,C,D,E,F

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. Hike in allocation towards infrastructure sectors by 1.5 times to around Rs 2.8 trillion to provide strong construction

    opportunity to EPC players. Roads & highways, railways and urban infrastructure segments to be major

    beneficiaries. As private sector interest is muted, the budget plans to step up public funding. However, institutional

    capacity to execute projects across sectors will have to be monitored.

    B. Investment for development of national highways has been increased by 178% y-o-y to Rs 856 billion. A significant

    portion will be funded through a Rs 4 per litre hike in road cess on petrol and diesel. The increase in public funding

    has the potential to boost national highway execution by about 5,800 km annually, creating strong construction

    opportunity for road EPC companies.

    C. In railways, outlay has been increased by 52% to Rs 1 trillion, with focus on capacity expansion and decongestion of

    the existing network. There have been significant PPP announcements in coastal connectivity, gauge conversion,

    Direct Freight Corridor and expansion of the Mumbai suburban railway network.

    D. Planned outlay on urban infrastructure development, which includes development of smart cities and metro rail

    projects, has been increased by 37%.

    E. Issuance of tax-free bonds for roads, railways and irrigation projects and establishment of the National Investment

    and Infrastructure Fund (with corpus of Rs 200 billion) proposed to be explored as means for additional finance.

    Rationalisation of tax regime for infrastructure investment trusts could free up private capital locked in completed

    projects.

    F. Governments intent to table Public Contracts Resolution of Disputes Bill to provide speedy dispute redressal in

    large public projects and create conducive environment for PPP projects.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    34

    Fertilisers

    Announced subsidy adequate; overall neutral impact

    Company Impact Impact factors

    Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals Ltd A, B

    Coromandel Fertilisers Ltd A, B

    Gujarat State Fertilisers Company Ltd A, B

    National Fertilisers Ltd A

    Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd A, B

    Zuari Industries Ltd A, B

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. Budgeted subsidy of Rs 730 billion for 2015-16 will be adequate to cover the subsidy burden of Rs 697 billion. The

    subsidy spillover to 2016-17 will be lower at Rs 260 billion, compared with Rs 290 billion in the previous year.

    B. Customs duty on sulphuric acid (used for manufacturing phosphatic fertilisers) has been reduced to 5% from 7.5%.

    However, sulphuric acid accounts for a small proportion of overall costs. Hence, the impact will be marginal.

    Fertilisers: Tariffs, prices and landed costs

    Tariffs (per cent) Prices (January 2015)

    Customs Excise Domestic International Pre- Post-

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 (Rs/tonne) ($/tonne) budget budget

    Urea 5.0 1.0 5,360 303 21,190 21,190

    DAP 5.0 1.0 23,000 484 35,019 35,019

    MOP 5.0 1.0 17,000.0 325 21,897 21,897

    Ammonia 5.0 1.0 n.a. 515 36,590 36,590

    Phosphoric acid 5.0 - NT 765 51,055 51,055

    Sulphur 2.5 - n.a. 193 12,470 12,470

    Rock phosphate 2.5 - NT 121 9,410 9,410

    Naphtha 0 - 26,609 428 28,539 28,539

    Fuel oil 0 - 27,262 280 18,399 18,399

    Contracted LNG2 5.0 - - 713 46,588 46,588

    Notes:

    1) There is no excise and customs duty on naphtha and fuel oil used for production of fertilisers.

    2) International prices are FOB prices.

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Landed costs

    (Rs/tonne)

    DAP: Di-ammonium phosphate; LNG: Liquif ied natural gas

    MOP: Muriate of potash; NT: Not traded; n.a.: Not available

    "-" indicates not applicable

  • 35

    Hotels

    Impetus to tourism, positive for hospitality industry

    Company Impact Impact factors

    EIH Ltd A,B

    Hotel Leelaventure Ltd A,B

    Indian Hotels Company Ltd A,B

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. The budget proposes to increase the service tax from 12.36% to 14%. For hotels in India, the service tax is

    applicable for both rooms and food & beverage (F&B). CRISIL Research expects the increase in the service tax to

    have a negligible impact on the hotel industry as hoteliers will be able to pass it on to the customers.

    B. The budget proposes to extend the Visa on Arrival (VoA) facility, currently available for 43 countries, to 150

    countries in a stagewise manner. This is expected to improve the tourism competitiveness of India and boost foreign

    tourist arrivals (FTAs) in the country, which were 7.5 million in 2014. As per a survey conducted by the World

    Economic Forum in 2013, India ranked 65th in the overall travel and tourism competitiveness but ranked a dismal

    132nd in terms of visa restrictiveness (which factors in the ease in obtaining visas). Among the BRICS nations,

    South Africa, Brazil and Russia outrank India in terms of flexible visa policies. In another move to boost FTAs along

    with domestic tourist arrivals (DTAs), the budget proposes to carry out restoration work on nine World Heritage Sites

    across India churches and convents of Old Goa, Hampi in Karnataka, Elephanta Caves near Mumbai, Kumbalgarh

    and other hill forts of Rajasthan, Rani ki Vav in Patan, Gujarat, Leh Palace in Ladakh, Varanasi Temple Town in

    Uttar Pradesh, Jalianwala Bagh in Amritsar and Qutub Shahi Tombs in Hyderabad. Since tourist growth typically

    boosts demand for premium segment hotels, the proposals bode well for the hospitality industry in India.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    36

    Household Appliances

    Basic customs duty exemption on OLEDs to have miniscule impact

    Company Impact Impact factors

    Videocon Industries Limited A,B

    Whirlpool of India Limited A,B

    MIRC Electronics Limited A,B

    Voltas Limited A,B

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. The basic customs duty for Organic LED (OLED) panels has been reduced to nil from 10%. However, as OLED TVs

    account for less than 0.5% of total panel TV sales, this cut will not have any significant impact.

    B. Increase in MNREGA allocation is expected to improve rural incomes, thus supporting consumer durable sales. This

    will have a marginal positive impact on the sector.

    Household Appliances: Tariffs

    (Per cent)

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16# 2014-15 2015-16

    B/W TVs 10.3 10.3 12.4* 12.5 - -

    Colour TVs (CRT, LCD, LED) 10.3 10.3 12.4* 12.5 30 30

    Refrigerators 10.3 10.3 12.4* 12.5 35 35

    Room ACs 10.3 10.3 12.4* 12.5 25 25

    Washing machines 10.3 10.3 12.4* 12.5 35 35

    CPT 0.0 0.0 12.4* 12.5 - -

    LCD and LED panels 0.0 0.0 12.4* 12.5 - -

    OLED panels 10.3 0.0 12.4* 12.5 - -

    Compressors 7.7 7.7 12.4* 12.5 - -

    Thermostat and tubes 7.7 7.7 12.4 12.5 - -

    Steel coils 7.5 7.5 12.4 12.5 - -

    Polymers 5.2 5.2 12.4 12.5 - -

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Customs Excise Abatement rate

    *Excise duty rates w ith effect from 1st January, 2015

    CRT: Cathode ray tube, LCD: Liquid crystal display, Light Emitting Diode, CPT: Colour picture tube

    #Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess are subsumed in the Central Excise Duty and

    general rate of Central Excise Duty rounded off to 12.5 per cent

  • 37

    Information Technology

    No significant impact

    Company Impact Impact factors

    TCS B

    Infosys B

    Wipro B

    HCL Technologies B

    Tech Mahindra B

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. Exemption of basic customs duty, countervailing duty and special additional duty on input components used in

    manufacturing tablet computers to lower tablet prices.

    B. Allocation of Rs 10 billion towards Techno-Financial Incubation and Facilitation Programme for technology start-ups

    and self-employment to help industry adopt new technologies and provide employment opportunities.

    Information technology: Tariffs

    (%) 1

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16**

    Information technology softw are 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3

    Personal computers 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.5

    Monitor 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.5

    Keyboard 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.5

    Mouse 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.5

    Printer 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.5

    FDD, HDD, CD-ROM drive and other storage drives2 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.5

    Motherboards 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.5

    Microprocessors3 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.5

    Routers 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.5

    Modems 0.0 0.0 12.4 12.5

    1 Tax rate is inclusive of education cess.

    2FDD: Floppy disk drive; HDD: Hard disk drive; CD-ROM: Compact disk-read only memory.

    3Microprocessors meant for fitment inside the CPU housing/laptop body.* Basic customs duty and does not include CVD, SAD

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Customs * Excise

    ** Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess are subsumed in Central Excise Duty

    and general rate of Central Excise Duty rounded off to 12.5%.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    38

    Media & Entertainment

    No significant impact of the Budget

    Company Impact Impact factors

    Balaji Telefilms -

    Dish TV -

    Entertainment Network India A

    Hathway Cable & Datacom -

    HT Media -

    PVR -

    Zee Entertainment Enterprises -

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factor

    A. Service tax is to be levied on tickets purchased for events such as concerts, pageants, sporting events and award

    functions if the admission amount exceeds Rs 500 per person. However, this is unlikely to have a major impact as

    we expect the event organisers to pass on the hike in ticket prices to buyers.

    Media & Entertainment: Tariffs

    (Per cent) Customs Excise

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16

    Digital cinema equipment 7.7 7.7 12.4 12.5

    Broadcast equipment 10.3 10.3 12.4 12.5

    Set-top boxes 10.3 10.3 12.4 12.5

    Source: CRISIL Research

  • 39

    Non-ferrous metals

    Neutral impact

    Company Impact Impact factors

    Hindalco Industries Ltd A, B, C, D

    Hindustan Copper Ltd A, C, D

    Hindustan Zinc Ltd A, D

    National Aluminium Co. Ltd A, B, C, D

    Sesa Sterlite Ltd. A, B, C, D

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. Basic excise duty hiked to 12.50% from 12.36%; as a result, domestic prices of aluminium, copper, lead and zinc

    will inch up marginally by Rs 200-300 per tonne

    B. Clean energy cess on coal doubled to Rs 200 per tonne, which will also have a negligible impact as it accounts for

    about 2% of total coal cost per tonne for aluminium players.

    C. The Special Addtional Duty (SAD) on aluminium and copper scrap has been halved to 2%. This reduction would

    address the problem of CENVAT credit accumulation emanating from the exisiting differential between the Central

    Sales Tax (CST) of 2% and the SAD of 4%. In the existing structure, players are eligible for a CENVAT credit refund

    of only 2% on an SAD levy of 4%. With both CST and SAD being equalised, players will be able to get a full refund

    on the SAD.

    D. The budget proposes to increase allocation towards the infrastructure segment by about 53% to Rs 2.8 trillion.

    Higher public investments in infrastructure segments such as urban & rural development, power and aviation (end-

    users of aluminium, copper and zinc) will marginally benefit the domestic non-ferrous metals industry.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    40

    Non Ferrous metals: Tariffs, prices and landed costs

    Domestic2 International3 Pre-budget Post-budget

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 (Rs/tonne) ($/tonne)

    Aluminium ingots 5.2 5.2 12.4 12.5 163,667 2,210 170,363 170,581

    Aluminium products

    - Flat-rolled products 5.2 5.2 12.4 12.5 - - - -

    - Foils 5.2 5.2 12.4 12.5 - - - -

    Aluminium scrap 5.2 5.2 12.4 12.5 - - - -

    Non-coking coal 2.1 2.1 6.2 6.2 - - - -

    Caustic soda 7.7 7.7 12.4 12.5 - - - -

    Calcined 2.6 2.6 14.4 14.4 - - - -

    petroleum

    coke

    Copper 5.2 5.2 12.4 12.5 450,000 5,693 437,049 437,607

    Copper scrap 5.2 5.2 12.4 12.5 - - - -

    Copper ore and 2.6 2.6 4.1 4.1 - - - -

    concentrates

    Lead 5.2 5.2 12.4 12.5 135,000 1,809 139,660 139,838

    Lead ore and 2.6 2.6 4.1 4.1 - - - -

    concentrates

    Zinc 5.2 5.2 12.4 12.5 173,000 2,105 162,324 162,531

    Zinc ore and 2.6 2.6 4.1 4.1 - - - -

    concentrates

    Note:

    1) Tariff rates are inclusive of 3 per cent education cess in 2014-15

    2) International prices are average LME cash prices; LME aluminium prices includes premium

    3) Domestic prices are average prices for February 2015

    Tariff (per cent)1 Prices (February 2015) Landed cost (Rs/tonne)

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Customs Excise

  • 41

    Oil and Gas

    Oil & Gas: Higher Govt share in under-recovery burden for 2015-16: positive for oil companies

    Company Impact Impact factors

    Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd A

    Reliance Industries Ltd B

    Cairn India Ltd -

    Oil India Ltd A

    Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. A,B

    Bharat Petroleum Corporat.ion Ltd A,B

    Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd A,B

    GAIL A

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. The government's estimate of oil subsidies in 2014-15 and 2015-16 will wipe out the subsidy rollover of Rs 90-100

    billion from 2014-15, reducing working capital requirements of oil marketing companies (OMCs). With the

    government contributing Rs 300 billion towards fuel subsidies (including rollover), upstream oil companies will see a

    5% decline in their contribution to under-recoveries in 2015-16.

    B. Increase in road cess on petrol and diesel has been completely offset by decline in basic excise duty and removal of

    education cess. Hence, there will be no impact.

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    42

    Oil and gas: Tariffs, prices and landed costs

    Domestic InternationalPre-

    Budget

    Post-

    Budget

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 (Rs/tonne) ($/tonne)

    Motor spirit (MS) 2.6 2.6 Rs 17.46/ltr Rs 17.46/ltr 79,595 457 30,032 30,032

    Aviation turbine fuel

    (ATF)8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 65,041 815 56,691 56,691

    Naphtha 5.2 5.2 14.4 14.4 26,609 428 29,207 29,207

    Superior kerosene oil

    (SKO)

    - Industrial use 5.2 5.2 14.4 14.4 44,839 500 34,039 34,039

    - Domestic use 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18,610 500 32,372 32,372

    High-speed diesel

    (HSD)2.6 2.6 Rs 10.26/ltr Rs 10.26/ltr 57,569 468 30,674 30,674

    Fuel oil 5.2 5.2 14.4 14.4 27,261 280 19,347 19,347

    Liquefied petroleum

    gas (LPG)5.2 5.2 8.2 8.2 59,479 452 32,184 32,184

    Bitumen 5.2 5.2 14.4 14.4 31,130 280 20,682 20,682

    Crude oil 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n.a. 353 - -

    LNG3 5.0 5.0 - - - 713 46,588 46,588

    CNG - - 14.0 14.0 - - 43,450 43,450

    '-' indicates not applicable

    n.a.: Not available

    2 Price per '000 scm

    3 Prices are for contracted LNG

    Notes

    1) International prices are FoB Arab Gulf prices.

    2) Domestic price of petroleum products are ex-storage point prices.

    3) Priority sectors for natural gas include pow er and fertiliser.

    4) Domestic natural gas prices represent landfall prices for each category.

    5) Customs duty and excise duty on naphtha used for fertiliser is nil.

    6) Customs duty and excise duty on fuel oil used in fertiliser is nil.

    7) Additional customs duty of Rs 2/litre is levied on Motor spirit and HSD

    Landed costs

    Source: CRISIL Research

    (per cent) (January 2015) (Rs/tonne)

    1 Cess on crude oil (in lieu of excise) is Rs 4,500 per tonne , National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD) of Rs 50/mt levied on

    imports of crude oil

    Tariffs

    Customs Excise

    Prices

  • 43

    Paper

    Continued budgetory allocation for education to maintain demand for W&P paper

    Company Impact Impact factors

    International Paper APPM A, B, C

    Ballarpur Industries Ltd. A, B, C

    Sirpur Paper Ltd A, B, C

    Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. A, B, C

    Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Ltd. A, B, C

    West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. A, B, C

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. Budgetary allocation of Rs 689 billion to the education sector to translate into steady demand for creamwove and

    maplitho paper (that together comprise about 25% of total paper consumption), which are used primarily as

    education stationery.

    B. Doubling of the energy cess will drive up power costs (that form about 15 per cent of total costs) and consequently

    pull down profitability by 30 basis points, given the muted demand growth.

    C. The governments push to the Digital India programme would affect demand, especially for writing and printing

    paper, in the long term.

    Paper: Tariffs

    (per cent)

    Domestic International Pre-budget Post-budget

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 (Rs/tonne) ($/tonne)

    New sprint 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35,000 561 34,594 34,594

    Maplitho 10.3* 10.3* 6.2 6.2 51,000 n.a. - -

    Duplex board 10.3* 10.3* 6.2 6.2 33,000 n.a. - -

    Art board 10.3* 10.3* 6.2 6.2 56,000 n.a. - -

    Wood pulp (hard) 5.2* 5.2* 2.1 2.1 NT 630 41,674 41,674

    Wood pulp (soft) 5.2* 5.2* 2.1 2.1 NT 560 37,044 37,044

    Waste paper (OCC) 12* 12* 6.2 6.2 12,200 250 18,326 18,326

    * Custom duty values are 0 for ASEAN countries after the FTA in December 2013

    n.a. - Not available

    Tariff (per cent) Prices (Jan 2015) Landed cost (Rs/tonne)

    Customs Excise

    NT: Not traded

    Prices are delivered prices excluding VAT (delivered: basic+excise+octroi+avg freight prices)

    Source: CRISIL Research

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    44

    Petrochemical

    Duty cuts to support profitability of most petrochemical players

    Company Impact Impact factors

    Basic petrochemicals and intermediates

    Reliance Industries Ltd A, B

    GAIL A

    Supreme Petrochem Ltd B

    Finolex Industries Ltd B

    Chemplast Sanmar Ltd B

    Styrolution ABS Ltd B

    Bhansali Engineering Polymers Ltd B

    Note: The impact specified is only for the petrochemicals business of the companies listed above.

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. Excise duty on non-industrial polyethylene sacks and bags increased to 15% from 12% to have very limited impact,

    as non-industrial bags segment constitutes a small portion of demand, and even after increase in duties the product

    would still be cost-effective as compared to other available substitutes.

    B. Basic customs duty on raw materials like ethylene dichloride (EDC), vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) and styrene

    monomer (SM) reduced to 2% from 2.5%. Also, special additional duty (SAD) on EDC, VCM, naphtha and SM

    lowered to 2% from 4%. Consequently, raw material cost would reduce for all naphtha-based petrochemical

    producers which would be passed on. However, reductions in customs duty and SAD for feedstock would lower

    costs for manufacturers of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and downstream styrene products and support their profitability

    as landed cost of raw materials would fall by around 2.4%.

  • 45

    Petrochemicals: Tariffs, domestic prices and landed costs

  • CRISIL Budget Analysis

    46

    Pharmaceuticals

    No major impact on industry revenues and profitability

    Company Impact Impact factors

    Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd A,B

    Cipla Ltd A,B

    Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd A,B

    Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd A,B

    Biocon Ltd A,B

    Source: CRISIL Research

    Impact factors

    A. The basic excise duty has been increased from 12.36% to 12.5% but we expect the impact on margins for large

    pharmaceutical companies to be less than 10 bps as over 60% of their revenues comes from exports.

    B. The increase in service tax rate to 14% is unlikely to impact profitability of most players as majority of their R&D

    expenditure is in-house. However, for Biocons subsidiaries - Syngene and Clinigene - which operate in the clinical

    trials space, the increase in service tax could have a marginally negative impact.

    C. The government has also proposed to set up three new National Institutes of Pharmaceutical Education and

    Research (one each in Maharashtra, Rajasthan, and Chhattisgarh) to help create a talent pool in the longer term.

    Pharmaceuticals: Tariffs

    (Per cent) Customs Excise

    2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16

    Bu