Criminal Minds - Exhibition Proposal

47
Criminal Minds Emma Bornebroek and Margaux Calon Proposal for the Wellcome Collection Temporary Exhibition Space 1

description

A proposal for an exhibition in the Wellcome Collection's temporary gallery space. Created by Emma Bornebroek and Margaux Calon

Transcript of Criminal Minds - Exhibition Proposal

Criminal  minds  

Proposal  for  the  Wellcome  Collection  Temporary  Exhibition  Space  

Emma  Bornebroek  and  Margaux  Calon  

Criminal Minds

Emma Bornebroek and Margaux Calon

Proposal for the Wellcome Collection Temporary Exhibition Space

1  

Table of Contents

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

2  

Introduction...........................................  Aims  and  Objectives..............................  Floor  Plan  and  Content  Overview.........  Text.........................................................  Mise  en  Scene........................................            Mood  Board.......................................    Introductive/Conclusive  Space..............  Room  1  –  A  Crime?..................................            Definitions..........................................            What  If?..............................................  Room  2  –  Criminals?...............................            Killer  Instincts....................................            Criminal  Subconscious......................            Corrupted  Minds...............................  Room  3  –  Causes??.................................            Early  Criminology...............................            Free  Will.............................................            Causes  and  Correlates.......................            The  Biology  Underneath...................  Room  4  –  Cure  or  Conviction?...............            Preventing  Crime...............................            Science  in  the  Courtroom.................            Towards  a  Cure?.................................    Events.....................................................  Evaluation..............................................  Fold  Out  Map.........................................  

3  3  4  5  6  8    9  10  11  13  16  17  19  21  24  25  27  29  31  33  34  36  39    40  42  46  

Criminal Minds – The Exhibition

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

Introduction  Whether   it   is   the   recent   attack   in  Woolwich,   Jack   the  Ripper   or   the  Columbine  High   School  Massacre,   horrific   events   often   seem   to   raise   the  question  of  why  certain  members  of   society   commit  unspeakable   crimes?  And  as  understanding  something   is   often   the   best   way   to   start   dealing   with   it,   asking   this   question  makes  sense.      However,  in  addition  to  attempting  to  understand,  Western  society  simply  seems  to  be  fascinated  by  crimes  and  criminals   in  general.  Crime  series  such  as  Dexter  and  NCIS  are  ever  popular,  and  media  coverage  of  criminal  cases  is  vast,  testifying  our   horrific   voyeurism.   In   some   regards,   this   attention   is   problematic,   as   it   is  often  stereotypical  and  contributes  to  a  narrow  perception  of  crime.      In  reality,  the  subjects  of  crime  and  criminality  are  complex.  They  rely  on  cultural  and  philosophical  concepts,  calling  for  a   reflection  on  the  nature  of  society  and  individual.      Besides   the   cultural   side,   comprehending   crime  has   also   increasingly   become  a  topic  of  science.    Especially  medicine  is  now  making  steps  towards  understanding  crime   by   prying   apart   the   complex   biological   contributions   to   our   criminality.  Such  understanding  could  have  important  implications  for  our  ideas  about  crime.      Given  these  developments,  we  feel  it  is  important  to  provoke  a  discussion  about  crime  that  considers  all   the  different  aspects   that   relate   to   it,   including  science,  society,  professional  fields,  and  of  course,  criminals  themselves.      This   discussion  would   be   particularly   relevant   to   the  Wellcome   Collection   as   it  puts  a   the  biomedical  aspects  of  understanding  crime   in  a   larger  social,  cultural  and   historical   context,   providing   the   'incurably   curious'   with   insights   into  different  ideas  and  with  new  ways  of  thinking.      

Aims  and  Objectives  Our  aim  is  to  invite  people  to  challenge  their  assumptions  about  criminality.  To  allow  people  to  go  beyond  society’s  often  black  and  white  perception  between  bad  and  good,  criminals  and  citizens,  insanity  and  normality.    Within  this,  our  sub-­‐aim  is  to  raise  the  attention  on  the  fact  that  science  can  play  a  role  in  challenging  society’s  ideologies.    In  this,  we  feel  it  is  possible  nor  desirable  for  us  to  assert  what  their  should  replace  their  current  assumptions  with  by  providing  'answers'.  First  of  all,  there  are  no  clean  answers  within  science  and  philosophy,  and  secondly,  the  idea  of  crime  depends  on  each  individual's  opinion  on  society  and  morality  too  much.        Instead,  what  we  intend  to  do  is  to  is  ask  questions  and  provide  visitors  with  the  elements  that  may  help  them  formulate  their  own  questions  and  eventually,  their  own  answers.    To  achieve  this,  we  aim  to  adopt  a  number  of  different  strategies.  First  of  all  throughout  the  exhibition,  we  will  provide  visitors  with  elements  of  different  sides  and  aspects  of  the  issues  at  hand.  Secondly,  the  interpretative  material  will  often  ask  questions.  Thirdly,  we  will  incorporate  interactive  that  stimulate  people  to  voice  their  opinion  or  reveal  their  behaviours  on  subjects  like  the  subjectivity  of  the  notion  of  crime,  human’s  potential  to  behave  as  criminals  or  the  assessment  of  a  criminal’s  responsibility.      To  engage  visitors  into  an  introspective  reflection  in  an  effective  way,  our  exhibition  progresses  from  the  general  to  the  particular.  To  start,  we  want  to  provide  visitors  with  handles  to  consider  the  idea  of  criminality.  This  will  be  done  by  first  considering  what  is  defined  as  a  crime  in  different  cultures  and  historical  periods.  Following  this  will  be  a  consideration  of  how  philosophy  and  psychology  approached  the  question  of  the  human’s  criminal  nature.    These  two  aspects  then  act  as  a  contextual  introduction  into  the  areas  of  the  exhibition  that  address  the  more  specific  question  of  the  biological  and  environmental  causes  of  criminality,  and  the  ambiguous  role  that  science  plays  in  criminological  studies.            

3  

Floor Plan and Content Overview

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

4  

Text

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

 The  structure  of  our  exhibition  is  such  that  it  doesn’t  need  too  much  text  to  make  sense.  As  we  intend  to  induce  the  visitors  to  reflect  on  their  perception  of  criminals  and  investigate  the  criminal  minds  we  don’t  want  text  to  be  too  invasive,  distracting  and  directing.  However,  it  is  important  to  provide  information;  therefore  labels  will  give  details  about  the  context  of  the  objects  and  for  star  objects,    the  visitor  could  access  a  larger  amount  of  information  on  digital  tablets  and  leave  comment,  as  is  done  at  the  Natural  History  Museum  in  the  Treasures  Gallery.    

Hierarchy    Exhibition  introduction:  70-­‐100  words  Theme:  30-­‐50  words  (raise  topic,  ask  question)  Sub-­‐theme:  50-­‐70  words  (information  about  each  subthemes)  Object  label  :  10-­‐50  words  (anecdote  or  history,  explanations  when  suitable    Examples    Exhibition  introduction:  100-­‐150  words  Whether  it  is  the  recent  attack  in  Woolwich,  Jack  the  Ripper  or  the  Columbine  High  School  Massacre,  horrific  events  often  provoke  debate  of  why  certain  members  of  society  commit  unspeakable  crimes.  But  for  most  of  us,  newspapers  headlines  and  crime  series  are  the  only  elements  we  have  to  make  sense  of  criminal  behaviour.  This  exhibition  is  an  invitation  to  question  our  conception  about  criminality  and  its  interaction  with  society  and  science.    Theme:  30-­‐50  words  (raise  topic,  ask  question)  Cultures  in  different  part  of  the  world  and  of  the  history  have  different  ways  of  defining  what  a  crime  is.  But  what  we  all  have  in  common  as  a  humankind  is  our  potential  to  be  violent  and  harm  others.  Is  it  the  nature  of  human  to  be  criminal?    Sub-­‐theme:  50-­‐70  words  (information  about  eact  subthemes)  From  the  content  of  our  genes  and  the  lessons  of  evolutionary  biology,  it  has  become  clear  that  nature  is  filled  with  competition  and  conflicts  of  interest  that  eventually  lead  to  violent  and  criminal  behaviour.    This  subsection  explores  the  theory  of  the  “killer  ape”,  suggesting  that  humankind  is  naturally  evil  and  that  only  civilization  prevent  us  from  acting  like  beasts.    Object  label  :  10-­‐50  words  (anecdote  or  history,  explanations  when  suitable)  Human  skull  bearing  Homo  neanderthalensis  feature  with  cut  marks  from  butchering  with  a  flint  stone.  -­‐  35  000  BC,  Les  rois  Cave,  Aurignac,  France      

5  

Mise en scene

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

Overall  Atmosphere  and  Inspiration  Our  aim  is  to  create  an  atmosphere  that  is  introspective  and  intimate  yet  clear,   thereby   departing   from   the   cliché   of   the   gruesome   and  sensationalist  'haunted  house'.    

 When  creating  the  ideas  for  our  mise  en  scene,  we  kept  in  mind  the  way  the   exhibition   Death:   a   self   portrait   managed   to   deal   with   a   dramatic  subject   by   setting   a   cosy   and   intimate   atmosphere,   and   also   took  inspiration  from  the  Brain  exhibition  mise  en  scène.    

     

Colours    The  colours  generally  associated  with  criminality  are  black  and  red.  However,  this  colour  scheme  would  be  too  stark  for  our  more  broad-­‐minded  approach  of  the  subject.  In  order  to   fit   with   our   intentions,   we   adopted   shades   of   grey,   rather   than   black   as   the  main  colour,  and  a  spectrum  of  four  warm  reds  from  purple-­‐red  to  brown-­‐red  for  highlights.      

 

   

Use  of  Glass    Walls,  cases  and  other  divisions  will  be  primarily  made  of  glass.  The  use  of   this  material  will  give   the  visitor   the  opportunity   to  visually  connect  the   different   parts   of   the   exhibition,   thereby   strengthening   the  harmonious   flow   and   interconnection   between   the   rooms.  On   a  more  metaphorical   level,  we  chose  to  use  glass  wall  and  cases  to  depart  our  exhibition   from   the   dichotomy   in   and   out-­‐   in   and   out   of   jail   and   of  society.    

Use  of  Glass      

Lightings    General   lighting   in   the   rooms  will   be  of  normal   levels,   except   for   some  parts  where   a   specific   atmosphere  wants   to  be  created:  for  example,  the  subcategory  ‘a  criminal  subconscious’,  dealing  with  psychology,  will  require  dimmer  lights,  and  the  majority  of  the  'causes?'  room  will  be  more  brightly  lit.      In  addition,  spot  lighting  will  be  used  on  certain  objects  placed  in  front  of  a  dark  background  in  order  to  connote  a  piece  of  evidence,   and   also   create   extra   shades   of   grey.   Lastly,   some   specimens  will   be   singled   out  with   a   spotlight   in   order   to  emphasis  a  certain  aspect  or  to  guide  the  visitor  in  a  precise  direction.    

 6  

Mise en scene

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

Match  with  existing  structures  The  general  layout  of  the  temporary  collection  space  particularly  fits  our  subjects.  Indeed,  we  like  the  dichotomy  between  the  bright  wooden  floor  and  the  dark  industrial  ceiling  as  it  acts  like  a  metaphor  of  our  approach  to  the  subject  :  between  brightness  and  darkness  is  our  exhibition,  a  grey  area  playing  on  shades  and  light,  walls  and  open  spaces.    

   

Entrance  Outside  the  temporary  collection  space,  we  will  use  the  glass  panelling  as  a  way  to  advertise  the  exhibition  and  catch  people’s  attention  with  a  large  grey  panel  that  shows  the  title  of  the  exhibition  and  the  logo.    

Logo  The  Criminal  Minds  Exhibition  Logo  is  a  commissioned  piece  of  art  with  multiple  layers.  At  fight  sight,  it  seems  to  be  simply  a  brain  in  the  shades  of  the  colours  of  the  exhibition.  This  in  itself  would  fit,  as  minds  are  often  directly  linked  to  brains.      On  closer  inspection,  it  becomes  clear  that  the  lines  that  make  up  the  brain  are  forensic  body   shapes.   Firstly,   this  matches   the   theme  of   crime,   and   secondly,   the  use  of  many  body  shapes,  or  people,  matches  with  the  idea  that  society  also  has  a  big  role  to  play  in  defining  crime.    

7  

Mood Board

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

8  

Introductive/Conclusive Space

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

Match  with  existing  structures  The  general  layout  of  the  temporary  collection  space  particularly  fits  our  subjects.  Indeed,  we  like  the  dichotomy  between  the  bright  wooden  floor  and  the  dark  industrial  ceiling  as  it  acts  like  a  metaphor  of  our  approach  to  the  subject  :  between  brightness  and  darkness  is  our  exhibition,  a  grey  area  playing  on  shades  and  light,  walls  and  open  spaces.    

   

Introductive/Conclusive  Space  Upon  moving  through  the  entry  doors,  the  visitor  will  first  be  faced  with  a  big  curved  wall  that  displays  the  exhibition  title.  Directly  at  the  start,  there  will  be  an  interactive  which  invites  visitors  to  write  on  a  touchscreen  what  words  “criminal  minds”  connotes  to  them,  and  to  indicate  whether  they  have  already  seen  the  exhibition.      Moving  slightly  further  into  this  space,  two  word  clouds  are  projected  on  the  wall  that  enables  visitors  to  compare  people’s  vision  of  the  subject  before  and  after  the  exhibition  in  a  snapshot.  Within  the  same  area,  'teaser'  questions  relating  to  the  exhibition  content  will  hang  from  the  ceiling  on  the  way  to  the  entrance  of  the  first  room.    We  hope  that  this  explicit  self-­‐questioning,  together  with  the  time  it  takes  to  walk  from  the  entrance  and  interactive  to  the  entry  to  the  first  room,  will  allow  people  to  start  thinking  about  criminal  minds  before  coming  up  close  with  any  of  the  material  in  the  exhibition.    Also,  this  introductive  conclusive  space  will  contain  windows  to  each  part  of  the  exhibition,  to  arouse  curiosity  for  new  visitors  or  allow  recollection  for  those  who  have  gone  through  the  exhibition.    Furthermore,  this  room  will  include  a  small  seating  area  with  a  number  of  books  related  to  the  exhibition,  for  those  visitors  who  are  interested  in  finding  out  more.  

9  

Room 1 – A Crime?

Introduction  To  explore  criminal  minds,  you  first  need  to  define  what  crime  is.  On  first  thought,  this  might  seem  unproblematic.  After  all,  we  all  recognise  it  in  the  media,  and  it  is  even  written  down  black  on  white  in  extensive  law  books.  However,  on  a  closer  look,  a  definition  of  crime  might  not  actually  be  so  unproblematic.  By  showing  how  definitions  of  crime  vary  over  space,  time  and  circumstances,  this  room  invites  the  visitor  to  question  any  preconceived  notions  of  crime  they  might  have.  In  addition,  this  room  might  also  make  people  wonder  why  people  commit  crimes,  thereby  creating  anticipation  for  the  rest  of  the  exhibition.    

Subcategories  Definitions  -­‐  In  Our  Media  -­‐  In  Our  Law  -­‐  In  Law  Abroad  -­‐  In  Past  Law  -­‐  In  Religion  What  if?  -­‐  Official  -­‐  Incapable  Criminal  -­‐  Justified  

Display  This  room,  and  every  following  room,  starts  with  an  introductory  panel  that  raises  the  questions  addressed  in  this  area.  After  this,  the  visitor  will  move  from  areas  exploring  crime  in  media  and  law  into    into  a  spacious  gallery  that  displays  different  religious  art  relating  to  crime,  before  ending  in  the  subsection  that  asks  visitors  about  if  certain  acts  are  crimes  in  different  circumstances.  Though  the  from  one  section  to  another  is  relatively  linear,  people  can  choose  their  own  areas  of  interest  within  the  sections.    

A  Crim

e?  

10  

Introduction  This  subsection  deals  with  definitions  of  crime  and  non-­‐crime   in  different  contexts,  starting  from  the  mostly  familiar  and  uniform  moving   into  the  more  unfamiliar  and  variable.   It  starts  by  giving  examples  of  what  crime  is  according  to  the  mass  media,  thereby  giving  an  indication  of  commonly  held  notions.  Next  it  deals  with  crime  as  defined  in  our  law,  law  abroad,  and  past  law.  This  section  ends  with  an  exploration  of  definition  of  crime  in  different  religions.    

Subtheme 1a - Definitions

A  Crim

e?  

Area  A  –  In  Media  News   outlets   extensively   cover   crime,   and   thereby   both   reflect   and   inform  common  notions  of  what  a  crime  is.  This  area  displays  such  media  coverage  of  crime,   allowing   people   to   come   into   the   mindset   of   thinking   about   crimes  through  familiar  territory,  and  potentially  becoming  stimulated  to  think  about  the  minds  behind  these  crimes.        Exemplar  Objects  -­‐   newspaper   coverage   of   Boston  Marathon  Bombing,   London  Bus   Bombing,  Serial  Killer  'Dr  Death',  Serial  Killer  Couple  and  the  Great  Train  Robbery  -­‐  news  show  clips  of  similar  stories        

Area  B  –  In  Law  B1-­‐  In  our  law  Law,   by   definition   is   the   black   and   white   version   of   what   a   nation   has   decided   is   criminal.  Therefore,   our   own   law   gives   a   good   starting   point   to   allow   people   to   explore   what,  technically  speaking,  is  a  crime  

 Exemplar  objects    -­‐   collection  of  modern  british   law  books,   shelved   in   a  bookcase-­‐like  manner,   and  opened  on  relevant  pages  -­‐  tablets  that  allow  visitors  to  explore  the  law  books  further,  with  preset  options  for  exploring  prominent  cases  such  as  murder.    -­‐  short  information  bites  on  what  punishments  were  given  in  different  circumstances,  to  give  a  more  tangible  indication  of  how  'criminal'  a  deed  is  thought  to  be.    

11  

Subtheme 1a - Definitions

A  Crim

e?  

B2-­‐  In  law  abroad  Though  law  might  be  black  and  white,  it  is  not  black  and  white  everywhere.  Considering  contemporary  laws  from  other  countries  therefore  provides  a  first  starting  point  to  suggest  that  notions  of  crime  might  not  be  fully  universal.  This  case  is  located  right  by  the  'in  our  law'  case  to  allow  comparison.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  collection  of  foreign  law  books,  opened  on  pages  that  deal  with  similar  cases,  highlighting  similarities  and  differences.  -­‐  tablets  that  allow  visitors  to  explore  the  law  books  further,  with  preset  options  for  exploring  prominent  cases  such  as  murder.    -­‐  short  information  bites  on  what  punishments  were  given  in  different  circumstances,  to  give  a  more  tangible  indication  of  how  'criminal'  a  deed  is  thought  to  be.    

B3-­‐  In  past  law  Definitions  of  crime  and  thoughts  on  how  criminal  certain  actions  are  have  been  fluid  over  time.  Through  old  law  books,  reports  of  cases,  and  punishments  that  were  deemed  appropriate  at  the  time,  this  case  explores  the  notions  of  crime  in  the  past.  Besides  looking  at  what  was  criminal,  it  also  considers  what  types  of  activities  were  not  considered  criminal  at  the  time,  with  a  prominent  example  being  slave  trade.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Old  law  books  and  reports:    Year  Book  Literature  –  Reports  of  pleadings  in  cases  decided  in  English  courts  from  the  reign  of  Edward  I  (1272-­‐1307),  to  that  of  Henry  VIII  (1509-­‐47).    Includes  “black-­‐letter  editions”  published  between  1480  and  1680,  modern  editions,  and  abridgments.  -­‐  Canon  law  –  Approximately  2000  manuscripts  and  early  editions  of  the  ecclesiastical  law  of  the  Roman  Catholic  Church;  includes  numerous  editions  of  the  Decretum  Gratiani,  first  compiled  about  1140  by  an  Italian  monk  -­‐  Incunabula  –  Includes  more  than  300  volumes  dealing  with  Roman,  Canon,  feudal,  and    French  customary  laws  published  in  cities  throughout  continental  Europe  and  England  before  1501  in  Latin  and  vernacular  languages  of  the  period  

-­‐  old  punishment  devices  -­‐  slave  trade  related  leaflet  and  painting      

12  

Subtheme 1a - Definitions

A  Crim

e?  

Area  C  –  In  Religion  For  many  people,  both  in  the  past  and  present,  religion  forms  a  guideline  on  what  is  good  and  bad.  This  area  explores  these  notion  from  within  different  religions  with  artworks  each  displayed  individual  on  the  walls.    Besides  these  artworks,  this  section  also  has  a  centrepiece  that  contains  a  maya  vessel  with  depiction  of  human  sacrifice,  to  emphasise  the  point  that  certain  things  we  would  now  consider  criminal,  were  sometimes  not  considered  criminal  in  religion  and  in  fact  done  for  religion.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Christianity:  Hieronymous  Bosch's,  The  Seven  Deadly  Things  and  the  Four  Last  Things  -­‐  Buddhism:  the  Pancha  Sila,  the  five  precepts  of  morality  -­‐  Islam:  precepts  as  set  forth  in  the  Koran  -­‐  Maya:  vessel  with  depiction  of  human  sacrifice  

         C1    

C2  

13  

Introduction  In  the  end,  what  is  a  crime  to  someone  will  depend  significantly  on  the  circumstances.  This  part  of  the  room  poses  examples  to  the  visitor,  and  asks  them,  what  is  the  act  has  these  circumstances,  is  it  a  crime  to  you?  On  the  one  hand,  the  already  variable  definitions  of  a  crime  presented  in  the  earlier  part  are  questioned  by  this  whilst  on  the  other  hand,  it  provides  the  visitor  with  an  opportunity  to  define  for  themselves  what  is  a  crime,  and  therefore  who  might  be  a  criminal,  preparing  them  to  explore  criminal  minds.      Throughout  this  area,  there  will  be  interactives  that  allow  people  to  voice  their  opinion  on  how  criminal  the  cases  presented  are  in  their  opinion.  Selected  cases  that  are  presented  in  the  areas  will  have  a  frame  around  them  that  can  change  colour  from  white,  not  a  crime  at  all,  to  black,  fully  a  crime.  Using  a  touchscreen,  people  can  select  where  between  the  two  extremes  this  act  lies.  All  the  votes  will  averaged,  framing  the  case  with  the  resulting  shade  of  grey.  There  will  also  be  the  option  of  responding  with  written  messages.  

Subtheme 1b – What if?

A  Crim

e?  

Area  A  –  Official  Is  an  act  as  much  of  a  crime  if  it  is  done  by  official  bodies  through  official  ways?    

Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  guillotine:  In  the  middle  ages,  many  people  received  death  penalty  using  a  guillotine.  Is  murder  acceptable  if  it  is  an  official  punishment  of  a  criminal?  -­‐  mexican  execution:  Again,  is  murder  acceptable  if  it  is  an  official  punishment  of  a  criminal?  -­‐  battlefield:  is  destruction  of  property  not  a  criminal  if  it  happens  in  an  official  war?  

14  

Subtheme 1b – What If?

A  Crim

e?  

Area  B  –  Incapable  Crime  Is  an  act  as  much  of  a  crime  if  it  is  performed  by  somebody  who  might  have  been  mentally  incapable?      Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  lion  killing  another  animal's  young:  a  lot  of  killing  goes  on  in  nature,  but  this  is  normally  not  seen  as  a  crime,  is  it  a  crime?  -­‐  elephant  on  trial:  normally,  animals  are  not  help  responsible,  however,  in  this  case,  the  elephant  was  accused  of  murder  of  three  women  who  visited  a  parade  the  elephant  was  in  -­‐  The  famous  case  of  the  murder  of  the  two  year  old  toddler  Jamie  by  the  schoolboys  Jon  Veneables  and  Robert  Thompson    

Area  C  –  Justified  Is  an  act  as  much  of  a  crime  if  it  was  committed  in  response  to  another  wrong  deed?  Besides  posing  examples,  this  area  displays  a  short  video  of  an  experiment  that  showed  that  babies  as  young  as  8  months  old  already  think  it  is  acceptable  to  be  unkind  to  those  who  have  been  unkind  to  others.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  video  showing  the  puppet  show  in  the  experiment  together  with  the  baby's  reaction  -­‐  news  article  about  case  of  Patrick  and  Anne  Burke.  Anne  Burke  killed  her  husband,  Patrick  Burke,  by  striking  him  on  the  head  23  times  with  a  hammer  as  he  lay  in  bed.  However,  she  was  violently  abused  by  her  husband  throughout  their  32  year  marriage.  Is  the  murder  as  much  of  a  crime  still?          

15  

Room 2 – Criminals?

Subcategories  

Introduction  Cultures  in  different  part  of  the  world  and  of  the  history  have  different  ways  of  defining  what  a  crime  is.  But  what  we  all  have  in  common  as  a  humankind  is  our  potential  to  be  violent  and  harm  others.  Is  it  the  nature  of  human  to  be  criminal?      This  second  room  investigates  the  origins  of  the  violent  nature  of  human  beings.  The  aim  is  to  break  with  the  idea  of  criminals  being  a  distinct  element  of  society  by  asking  the  following  question:  are  we  all  potential  criminals?  To  address  this  question,  we  will  dive  into  a  debate  among  philosophers  and  psychologists  about  the  so-­‐called  “  origin  of  evil”  :  nature  or  culture  ?  It  provides  an  historical  and  a  philosophical  background  to  our  exhibition  and  invites  the  visitor  to  think  about  its  own  behaviour  as  an  individual  and  a  member  of  society.          

Display  This  second  room  investigates  the  origins  of  the  violent  nature  of  human  beings.  The  aim  is  to  break  with  the  idea  of  criminals  being  a  distinct  element  of  society  by  asking  the  following  question:  are  we  all  potential  criminals?  To  address  this  question,  we  will  dive  into  a  debate  among  philosophers  and  psychologists  about  the  so-­‐called  “  origin  of  evil”  :  nature  or  culture  ?  It  provides  an  historical  and  a  philosophical  background  to  our  exhibition  and  invites  the  visitor  to  think  about  its  own  behaviour  as  an  individual  and  a  member  of  society.    

 Crim

inals?  

Subcategories  -­‐  Killer  Instincts  

-­‐  The  Feral  Nature  of  Humans  -­‐  Are  we  Naturally  Selfish?  -­‐  Do  Animals  Commit  Murder?  -­‐   Civilization:  a  Safeguard?  

-­‐  Criminal  Subconscious  -­‐  The  shadow  -­‐  Thanatos  -­‐  Catharsis  

-­‐  Corrupted  Minds  -­‐  Altruism  -­‐  Performance  Art  -­‐  Le  Jeu  de  la  Mort  -­‐  The  Role  of  the  Media  

16  

Introduction  Area  This  introductive  area  contains  a  text  and  a  star  object  illustrating  the  idea  of  the  original  crime.      The  statue  of  Cain  slaying  Abel,  a  Biblical   scene   referring   to   the  first  human  crime,   is   staged   as   a   star   object   and   spot   lighted   from   below   in   order   to  arouse  the  visitor’s  interest  and  provoke  a  dramatic  impression.    

Crim

inals?  

Area  A  -­‐  The  Feral  Nature  of  Humans  A1:    This  case  explores  the  feral  nature  of  humankind  based  on  Darwin’s  theory  that  human  and  animals  share  the  same  will  to  fight  for  survival.  It  also  shows  how,  before  Darwin  and  19th  century  naturalism,  philosophy  and  more  precisely  Thomas  Hobbes  in  the  16th  already  established  a  direct  link  between  animals  and  human  in  an  attempt  to  establish  the  origins  of  humanity’s  evil.      Exemplar  objects    -­‐  Portraits  of  Charles  Darwin  and  Thomas  Hobbes    -­‐  Injured  skull  of  homo  neenderthalus:  theories  say  that  homo    sapiens  might  be  the  cause  of  their  disappearance.    -­‐  Copy  from  1676  of  Thomas  Hobbes  famous  book  “Leviathan”      A2:  Painting  of  prehistoric  man  fighting,  L’agresseur,    Léon-­‐Maxime  Faivre    

Area  B  -­‐  Interactive:  Are  we  naturally  selfish  or  collaborative?  This  interactive  questions  Thomas  Hobbes  assertion  in  his  Leviathan  that  the     human   nature   is   to   be   purely   focused   on   its   own   interest.   This  interactive   propose   simple   group-­‐based   financial   decision   tasks   :   it  requires  from  participants  to  choose  between  acting  selfishly—opting  to  maximize   individual  benefits  at   the  cost  of   the  group—or  cooperatively—opting  to  maximize  group  benefits  at  the  cost  of  the  individual.  Levels  after   levels,   the   time   to   take   these   decision  will   be   shorter.   This   game  aims   at   showing   that   faster—that   is,   more   intuitive—decisions   are  associated   with   higher   levels   of   cooperation,   whereas   slower—that   is,  more   reflective—decisions   are   associated   with   higher   levels   of  ‘selfishness’.    

Subtheme 1a – Killer Instincts

17  

Subtheme 1a – Killer Instincts

Crim

inals?  

Area  C  –  Do  animals  commit  murder?  This   area   suggests   that   we   should   be   cautious   in   drawing   comparison   with  animals   to  explain  our  own  behaviour  as   ‘murder’-­‐  different   from  the  killing   in  order   to  eat-­‐is   rare  among  other   species.   It   addresses   the   following  question:  are  human  the  only  criminal  living  being?      Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Mosaic  from  Pompeii  of  a  coquerel  fight    -­‐   Quote   of   anthropologist   Ashley  Montagu   written   on   the   wall:   “There   is   no  more   reason   to   believe   that   man   fights   wars   because   fish   or   beavers   are  territorial  than  to  think  that  man  can  fly  because  bats  have  wings.”  -­‐  Video  of  Jane  Goodal  TED  talk  “What  separates  us  from  Chimpanzee”          

Area  D  –  Civilization:  a  safeguard?  This  area  is  common  to  this  subsection  and  the  subsection  “a  criminal  subconscious”,  because  it   questions   the   assumption   shared   by   Thomas  Hobbes   and   Freud   that   even   though  we   are  equally  predisposed  to  commit  crime,  modern  civilization  and  social  structures  inhibit  antisocial  behaviours.    Through  a  series  of  objects,  this  area  raises  the  following  points:    -­‐  Some  social  structures  do  consider  antisocial  behaviour  as  legitimate  -­‐  Modern  civilizations  have  committed  the  worst  crimes,  like  the  United  States  and  the  atomic  bombs,  whereas  some  tribal  societies  (e.g.  the  Ifaluk  in  Micronesia  the  Batek  in  Malaysia)  are  considered  by  anthropologists  as  being  “peaceful”.      Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Collection  of  Corsican  knives  used  for  Vendetta,  a  system  that  allows  private  justice  and  can  lead,  in  Corsica  and  Albania,  to  the  annihilation  of  entire  families  up  to  7  generation.    -­‐  Pictures  of  tattooed  criminal  gang  from  Japan,  Russia  and  Mexico.    -­‐  Objects  from  Hiroshima  melted  by  the  atomic  bomb.    -­‐  Interactive  map  of  the  world  alternatively  showing  the  countries  with  the  most  criminality  and  the  places  where  ‘peaceful’  societies  live.          

18  

Introduction  If  all  humans,  seeing  as  we  all  came  from  the  same  ancestors,  have  the  potential  to  be  destructive  why  aren't  we?  Culture  and  the  rise  of  civilization  may  have  something  to  do  with  it.  We  learn  to  control  our  impulses  or  instincts  as  young  children.  However,  for  Jung  and  Freud,  the  founding  father  of  the  psychoanalysis  in  the  20th  century,  pulsions  of  death  and  destruction-­‐  called  'shadows'  by  Jung  and  ‘Thanatos'  by  Freud  are  still  present  in  our  subconscious,  and  can  be  only  be  managed  through  psychoanalysis.  This  reflexive  part  invites  visitors  to  think  about  their  dark  inner  self.  In  order  to  create  an  introspective  atmosphere  this  part  of  the  room  is  slightly  more  spacious,  darker  and  more  dim  lighted.        

Subtheme 1b – Criminal Subconscious

Crim

inals?  

Area  A  –  The  Shadow  Carl  Jung  recognized  that  our  potential  to  commit  crime  is  ingrained  in  human  culture  and  that  we  need  more  understanding  of  the  human  nature,  because  the  only  real  danger  that  exists  is  man  himself.  Since  Jung  was  a  psychiatrist,  he  valued  individuals  and  thought  that  each   person   had   the   ability   to   control   their   criminal   nature   or   shadow   thanks   to  introspection.  This  area  proposes  2  experiments  to  the  visitors:    

 A1:  The  visitors  are  invited  to  sit  or   lie  down  on  a  black  sofa-­‐like  the  ones  we  can  find  in  the  office  of  a  psychiatrist-­‐  and  listen  to  recordings  of  criminals’  session  with  psychiatrists.  The   testimony   are   anonymous   and   carefully   selected   as   what   we   want   is   to   share   the  feelings  of  the  criminals  about  their  own  behaviour,  not  about  the  details  of  their  crimes.  Low  and  calm  voice  will  be  preferably  selected  in  order  to  create  an  intimate  atmosphere,  reinforced  by  dim  lights  and  the  alcove  like  shape  of  the  walls.    A2:   This   area   displays   2   commissioned   artwork   by   Tim   Noble   and   Sue   webster   :   a  combination  of  sculpture  made  of  diverse  everyday  objects  and  bright   light   that  creates  two  amazing  shadow  sculpture  representing  a  human  shape  in  a  violent  position  projected  onto  the  wall.  The  visitors  are  invited  to  interact  with  the  sculptures  by  placing  their  own  shadow  next  to  them.        

19  

Crim

inals?  

Area  B  –  Thanatos  Writing  to  Albert  Einstein  in  the  early  1930s,  Sigmund  Freud  suggested  that  “man  has  in  him  an  active   instinct  for  hatred  and  destruction.”  Freud  went  on  to  contrast  this  “instinct   to   destroy   and   kill”-­‐   Thanatos-­‐   with   one   he   called     Eros-­‐an   instinct   “to  conserve  and  unify”.  According  to  him,  human   is  willing  to  surrender  his  destructive  instincts  to  the  needs  of  the  greater  community  but  actually  he  will  never  be  able  to  supress  his  most  basic  instincts.  This  case  will  show  how  this  idea  of  humankind  being  twofold  has  been  represented  in  different  cultures,  at  different  times.    

 Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Letter  from  Freud  to  Einstein    -­‐  La  jeune  fille  et  la  mort,  Drawing  of    Niklaus  Manuel  Deutsch,  1517  -­‐  Greek  vase  representing  Thanatos,  God  of  destruction  and  death.    -­‐  Antique  Chinese  plate  with  Ying  and  Yang.    -­‐  Copy  of  Louis  Stevenson’s  book,  Dr  Jekyll  and  M.  Hyde    

     

e

Area  C  –  Catharsis  This   area,   composed   of   paintings,   pictures   and   objects,   is   called   after   Aristotle’s  concept  of  the  purgation  of  emotions  through  art.  The  word  was  then  employed  by  Freudian  analysis's  in  the  20th  century  to  describe  the  act  of  expressing  pulsions  that  have  been  repressed  or  ignored.  This  area  underlines  how,  across  the  ages,  civilization  has  allocated  spaces  for  people  to  feed  their  fascination  for  violence  and  death.      Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Series  of  pictures  showing  crowds  at  public  executions  in  different  countries  and  at  different  time.    -­‐  Death  of  the  Toreador  by  Picasso,  1933  with  objects  used  during  bullfights.  -­‐   Le   gladiateur   by   Jean-­‐Léon   Gérome,   1872   with   weapons   used   by   gladiators   in   the  arena.      

       

Subtheme 1b – Criminal Subconscious

20  

Introduction  With  this  final  sub-­‐theme,  our  aim  is  to  counterbalance  the  idea  exposed  with  the  two  first  themes  that  man  is  naturally  evil  and  that  only  society  can  prevent  him  from  being  a  beast.  We  focus  on  the  case  of  the  18th  century  french  philosopher  Jean-­‐Jacques  Rousseau,  which,  in  his  dramatic  opening  lines  to  his  immensely  powerful  treatise  "The  Social  Contract,"  wrote  that  man  is  naturally  good  but  becomes  corrupted  by  the  pernicious  influence  of  human  society  and  institutions.  This  last  sub  theme  allows  us  to  finish  on  an  optimistic  note  and  is  a  good  way  to  introduce  the  third  theme  of  the  exhibition  which  will  look  at  the  causes  of  crime,  including  the  environmental  causes.    

Subtheme 1c – Corrupted Minds

Crim

inals?  

Area  A  –  Altruism  This  case  will  give  a  broad  overview  on  human’s  altruism.   It   is  split   in  two  as   it  focuses  on  two  key  characters   living  at  different  times  but  sharing  the   idea  that  man   is  capable  of  altruism  and  empathy:   Jean-­‐Jacques  Rousseau  and  Daniel  Batson,  an  American  social  psychologists   specialized   in   the   social  psychology  of  altruism  and  empathic   concern.   In   the  middle,  An   interactive  based  on  Daniel  Batson’s  experiment   invites  visitors  to  put  their  hand   in  a  sensor  detecting  short-­‐time  stress  response  while  watching   images  of  someone  having   their  fingers  pinched  on  a  door.  A  screen  showing   the  evolution  of   the  blood  pressure  and  heart   rate  allows  visitors   to  see   the  physiological   form  of  what  Daniel  Batson  considers  as  empathy.  

 Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  A  copy  of  The  Social  Contract,  by  Jean-­‐Jacques  Rousseau  -­‐  An  interactive    -­‐  A  series  of  objects  symbolizing  human  altruism  in  western  society:  a  fireman  helmet,  a  salvation  army  donation  box  etc.          

21  

Subtheme 1c – Corrupted Minds

Crim

inals?  

Area  B  –  Performance  Art    This  area  displays  a  performance  art  by  Maria  José  Arjona.  Before  the  opening  of  the  exhibition,     Maria   José   Arjona   will   be   filmed   while   blowing   bubble   that   symbolize  “innocence."  But  when  the  bubbles  burst  on  the  wall,  they  leave  red  spots  behind;  an  element  of  violence  that  penetrates  the  seeming  idyll  of  this  "untitled"  performance.  The   video   of   the   performance   and   interview   of   the   artist   will   be   displayed   next   to  piece   of   art.   This   performance   is   particularly   relevant   to   illustrate   Rousseau’s  conception  of  man  as  a  candid  being  until  society  exert   its  bad  influence  on  him  and  eventually,  turns  him  into  murderers.      

       

e

Area  C  –  Le  Jeu  de  la  Mort  Le   jeu  de   la  mort   is   a  French  documentary  broadcasted  on   television   in  march  2010.  The  documentary  stages  a  fake  game  show  during  which  a  candidate-­‐who  thinks  the  TV  show  is  a  real  show-­‐must  send  electric  shocks  to  another  candidate  at   levels  that  can  cause  death.  This  documentary  reproduce  the  Milligram  experiment  made  in  1960  in  the  United  States  to  study  the  influence  of  authority  and  shows  that  on  80%  of  the  cases,  people  obey   to   the  order   and   inflict   lethal   shocks.   This   area  displays   the  box  used   during   the   show   and   invite   the   visitors   to   be   in   the   same   situation   as   the  participants:   they   can   choose   different   levels   of   shocks   and   see   on   the   screen   the  reaction  of  the  actor  filmed  for  the  documentary.  Although  this   is  different  from  the  real  experience  as  the  visitors  are  aware  that  Le  jeu  de  la  mort  is  fake,  it  induce  visitors  to  ask  themselves  “What  would  have  my  reaction  been?”.        

       

22  

Subtheme 1b – Corrupted Minds

Crim

inals?  

Area  D  –  The  Role  of  the  Media  This  area  addresses  the  question  of  the  role  of  the  media  regarding  criminality  and  violent  behaviours.  The  media  reflect  society’s  “horrific  voyeurism”  by  the  importance  it  gives  to  criminal  stories  and  is  accused  by  some  associations  and  specialist  to  provoke  violent  behaviours,  namely  among  teenagers.      D1:    Montage  of  newspapers  headlines  about  crimes  and  screens  showing  video  games,  criminal  series  and  action  movies.  An   infographic  will   show  the  number  of  crime-­‐related  content  that  could  be  seen  on  british  TV    in  a  week.      D2:    will  focus  on  the  special  case  of  Columbine  High  School  Massacre  which  occurred  in  1999.  This  massacre  sparked  a  debate  over  the  influence  of  violent  movies  and  videogames  in  American  society.  This  case  displays  the  guns  that  were  used  during  the  massacre  as  well  as  the  original  pages  from  one  of  the  two  murderer’s  diary.  +  running  shots  of  DOOM  II  ‘Harris  Levels’,  a  game  level  designed  by  Harris  in  one  of  the  games  he  played  much          

23  

Room 3 – Causes?

Subcategories  

Introduction  Whether  humans  are  naturally  criminal  or  not,  it  is  clear  that  there  are  differences  between  individuals  within  society.  What  is  it  that  makes  one  person  commit  a  crime  whereas  another  remains  a  peaceful,  law-­‐abiding  citizen?  

Over  history,  numerous  studies  have  looked  into  what  factors  might  contribute  to  people  committing  crime.  From  an  interesting,  though  pseudoscientific  start  around  the  18th  and  19th  century,  criminology  into  causes  has  now  grown  into  a  mature  field  of  often  medical  research,  which  is  starting  to  give  us  some  understanding  of  the  causes  of  criminality.  This  room  aims  to  give  the  visitor  an  insight  into  these  different  aspects  of  criminology,  and  thereby  giving  them  the  handles  to  start  thinking  about  the  causes  of  crime.          

Display  This   room   is   divided   into   two   parts,   each   of   which   carries   its   own  atmosphere.   The  main   area,   which   focuses   on   contemporary   explanations  for  criminal  behaviour,  has  an  open,  spacious  and  orderly  structure.  Visitors  can  move   freely  within   this   area,   and   choose   their  own  pathway   from  one  end   to   the   other.   As   the   different   segments   of   this   area   are   closely  connected,  there  will  be  no  overt  distinction  between  the  parts.  The  lighting  in  this  area  will  be  relatively  bright,  as  will  the  colours.  Together,  this  aims  to  convey   an   atmosphere   of   science.   The   smaller   subsection   of   this   room,  which   deals  with   the   past   of   criminological   studies,  will   have   a   completely  different  feel  to  it.  In  order  to  create  the  atmosphere  of  the  time,  the  lighting  will  be  darker,   the  packing  of  objects  more   tight  and  props  will  be  used  to  make   it   a   fusion   of   an   old-­‐fashioned   cabinet   of   curiosities   and   the   general  mise-­‐en-­‐scene  of  the  exhibition  in  general.    

 Cau

ses?  

Subcategories  Early  criminology  -­‐  The  Atavistic  Born  Criminal  -­‐  Phrenology  and  Physiognomy  -­‐  Brain  Studies  Free  will  -­‐  Two  Theories  -­‐  Interactive      

Causes  and  Correlates  -­‐  A  Wall  of  Potential  Correlates  Biology  Underneath  -­‐  Brains  -­‐  Genes  

24  

Subtheme 3a – Early Criminology Caus

es?  

Area    A–  The  Atavistic  Born  Criminal  In  the   late  19th  century,  Cesare  Lombroso,  who  headed  the  Italian  school  of  criminology,  brought  forward  the   idea  that  criminals  represent  evolutionary  setbacks.  Being  a  more  primitive  form  of  humans,  these   'atavists'  were   less  able  to  control   their  animal-­‐like   impulses,  and  hence  committed  they  crimes.  Lombrose  also  thought  the  atavism  showed   in  criminal's  physique,  and  he  collected  vast  amounts  of  data  on  this.      Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Portrait  of  Lombroso  -­‐  Original  tools  used  for  measuring  physical  characteristics  -­‐  A  first  print  copy  of  Lombroso's  book  'criminal  man'  -­‐  Illustrations  from  Lombroso's  book  'criminal  man'  -­‐  Wax  heads  of  examples  of  Lombroso's  atavistic  types      

       

Introduction  This  sub-­‐themes  explores  the  intriguing  beginnings  of  attempting  to  explain  criminal  behaviour.  Though  most  of  the  theories  presented  in  this  area  are  now  seen  as  pseudoscience,  these  early  studies  were  important  stepping  stones  in  going  towards  scientific  explanations  for  criminal  behaviour,  and  therefore  remain  important  within  criminology.      

25  

Subtheme 3a – Early Criminology Caus

es?  

Area  B  –  Phrenology  Another  theory  popular  in  the  19th  century  was  that  of  phrenology.  According  to  this  theory,   which   was   developed   by   Joseph   Gall,   measurements   of   the   skull   gave   you  information   about   the   relative   size   of   different   brain   areas.   This   in   its   turn,   was  thought  to  explain  the  behaviour  of  a  person,  including  whether  or  not  someone  is  a  criminal.   Though   now   seen   as   a   pseudoscience,   phrenology   played   part   in   moving  towards  the  study  of  neuropsychology.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Plaster  heads  of  convicted  criminals.  -­‐  A  set  of  60  miniature  phrenology  heads,  with  the  criminal  heads  highlighted  -­‐  Skull  with  phrenological  markings  on  it  -­‐  Basic  phrenological  study  skull  -­‐  Poster  illustrating  the  different  functions  of  different  areas  -­‐  Phrenology  measurement  helmets      

       

e

Area  C  –  Physiognomy  Physiognomy  suggested  that  a  person's  character  and  personality  could  be  inferred  from  the  appearance  of  the  face.  Initially  used  by  the  ancient  Greek  philosophers,  it  was  revived  in  the  late  18th  century  by  Lavater.  Despite  now  being  seen  as  a  pseudoscience,  some  recent  studies  have  shown  that  facial  appearance  to  a  small  extent  indeed  correlates  with  behaviour.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Collage  of  serial  killers  -­‐  Physiognomy  book  print    from  Lavater        

       

e

Area  D  –  Brain  Studies  Besides  looking  at  outer  appearance,  there  were  also  early  studies  that  looked  directly  at  the  brain,  and  at  the  criminal  brain  more  specifically.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Pictures  of  dissections  of  brains  of  criminals  -­‐  Exhibits,  pictures  of  50  criminal  brains  -­‐  Conserved  criminal  brain  in  a  jar  

26  

Subtheme 3b – Free Will Caus

es?  

Area    A–  Two  theories  Using  a  examples  from  popular  culture,  this  area  will  introduce  two  streams  of  thought  regarding  the  question  of  whether  criminals  have  'free  will',  in  their  acts.  The  idea  that  there  is  free  will,  as  was  believed  in  the  so  called  'classical  school',  will  be  hinted  at  by  tv  series  and  other  popular  culture  examples  that  are  implicitly  based  on  this  belief.  The  idea  that  certain  factors  are  so  influential  as  to  not  allow  full  free  will,  will  be  introduced  by  other  tv  series  and  popular  culture  examples  that  are  based  on  this  belief.  In  both  cases,  objects  relating  to  the  relevant  academic  schools  will  also  be  included.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Poster  and  selected  scenes  of  breaking  bad,  which  is  a  series  where  a  formerly  law  abiding  chemistry  teacher  decided  to  go  into  the  drugs  business,  so  that  he  can  make  money.  -­‐  Original  copy  of  'on  crime  and  punishment',  which  argued  for  rational  choice  theory,  saying  that  man  chooses  to  commit  crime  as  a  reasoning  individual.  -­‐  Poster  and  selected  scenes  of  ‘Dexter',  which  is  about  a  man  who  was  genetically  predisposed  to  become  a  serial  killer,  but  good  upbringing  by  his  adopted  father  means  he  kills  criminals,  rather  than  innocent  people.  -­‐  Chicago  school  of  criminology's  notes  on  zone  and  criminality,  which  argued  that  youth  in  certain  parts  of  town  commit  crime  because  of  the  conditions  of  the  town  they  live  in  -­‐  Twin  study  on  both  twins  committing  crime  

Introduction  The  very  idea  that  there  are  causes  of  crime  seems  to  suggest  to  some  extent  that  there  is  no  such  thing  as  full  free  will.  However,  the  question  of  free  will  has  not  been  settled  in  science  or  philosophy.  In  order  to  address  this  aspect  of  thinking  about  causes  of  crime,  this  area  considers  the  opposing  schools  of  thought  on  this  matter.      

Area    B–  Interactive  Based  on  the  partial  reconstruction  of  an  experiment  on  decision  making,  this  hands-­‐on  exhibit  aims  to  make  people  think  about  how  decision  making  might  not  be  the  way  we  think  it  is.  It  will  briefly  invite  people  to  press  a  button  either  with  their  left  or  their  right  finger,  whenever  they  want  to.  Next,  it  will  question  them  if  they  think  they  knew  when  they  were  making  this  decision.  Following  this  brief  introduction  will  be,  a  short  video  of  an  experiment  based  on  the  same  task  that  showed  that  actually,  the  decision  to  press  with  either  left  or  right  can  be  detected  in  the  brain  several  moments  before  the  subject  said  they  made  the  decision.      

27  

Subtheme 3b – Free Will Caus

es?  

Area  B  –  Phrenology  Another  theory  popular  in  the  19th  century  was  that  of  phrenology.  According  to  this  theory,   which   was   developed   by   Joseph   Gall,   measurements   of   the   skull   gave   you  information   about   the   relative   size   of   different   brain   areas.   This   in   its   turn,   was  thought  to  explain  the  behaviour  of  a  person,  including  whether  or  not  someone  is  a  criminal.   Though   now   seen   as   a   pseudoscience,   phrenology   played   part   in   moving  towards  the  study  of  neuropsychology.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Plaster  heads  of  convicted  criminals.  -­‐  A  set  of  60  miniature  phrenology  heads,  with  the  criminal  heads  highlighted  -­‐  Skull  with  phrenologycal  markings  on  it  -­‐  Basic  phrenologycal  study  skull  -­‐  Poster  illustrating  the  different  functions  of  different  areas  -­‐  Phrenology  measurement  helmets      

       

e

Area  C  –  Physiognomy  Physiognomy  suggested  that  a  person's  character  and  personality  could  be  inferred  from  the  appearance  of  the  face.  Initially  used  by  the  ancient  Greek  philosophers,  it  was  revived  in  the  late  18th  century  by  Lavater.  Despite  now  being  seen  as  a  pseudoscience,  some  recent  studies  have  shown  that  facial  appearance  to  a  small  extent  indeed  correlates  with  behaviour.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Collage  of  serial  killers  -­‐  Physiognomy  book  print    from  Lavater        

       

e

Area  D  –  Brain  Studies  Besides  looking  at  outer  appearance,  there  were  also  early  studies  that  looked  directly  at  the  brain,  and  at  the  criminal  brain  more  specifically.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Pictures  of  dissections  of  brains  of  criminals  -­‐  Exhibits,  pictures  of  50  criminal  brains  -­‐  Conserved  criminal  brain  in  a  jar  

28  

Subtheme 3c – Causes and Correlates Caus

es?  

Area    A–  A  Wall  of  Potential  Correlates  Along  the  full  length  of  the  wall  of  display  area  A,  a  mind  map  will  be  displayed  that  shows  all  factors  that  have  been  investigated  to  correlate  with  crime,  as  sourced  from  the  book  'correlates  of  crime'.  The  mind  map  will  be  designed  in  such  a  way  that  the  shades  and  size  of  the  words  indicate  whether  the  current  evidence  supports  or  dispels  the  idea  of  a  correlation,  and  how  significant  the  idea  is.      Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Mind  map:  examples  of  mind  maps  that  it  might  look  like  -­‐  Correlates  of  crime:  the  index  of  the  book  to  show  what  it's  about  

Introduction  From  childhood  friendships  to  the  shape  of  your  face,  a  multitude  of  factors  have  been  suggested  to  cause  or  correlate  with  criminal  behaviour.  Some  of  these  potential  factors  have  been  backed  up  by  science,  whereas  others  have  been  cleanly  dispelled.  However,  in  many  cases  the  story  is  more  complex.  This  area  aims  to  give  an  insight  suggested  causes  and  correlates  of  crime.  By  exhibiting  evidence,  questions  are  asked  on  to  what  extent  a  factor  indeeds  correlate  with  crime,  and  what  this  means  for  causation.      

29  

Subtheme 3c – Causes and Correlates Caus

es?  

Area    B–  Highlighted  Hypothesis  Along  the  full  length  of  the  wall  of  display  area  A,  a  mind  map  will  be  displayed  that  shows  all  factors  that  have  been  investigated  to  correlate  with  crime,  as  sourced  from  the  book  'correlates  of  crime'.  The  mind  map  will  be  designed  in  such  a  way  that  the  shades  and  size  of  the  words  indicate  whether  the  current  evidence  supports  or  dispels  the  idea  of  a  correlation,  and  how  significant  the  idea  is.    This  area  will  focus  in  on  a  number  of  the  most  prominent  hypotheses  regarding  causes  or  correlates  of  crime:  Highlights,  broken  childhood,  substance  abuse,  phychological  traits,  socio-­‐economic  factors,  gender,  video  games,  intelligence,  body  types.    Each  hypothesis  has  its  own  display  case  with  objects  to  represent  the  cause,  an  infographic  to  explain  the  science  and  an  interactive  where  suitable.  When  suitable,  the  display  cases  will  be  placed  close  to  other  parts  of  the  exhibit  that  relate  to  them.  With  regards  to  display  cases,  each  will  have  a  different  height,  so  that  together,  the  block  shaped  displays  will  hint  at  the  type  of  bar  graph  often  seen  in  crime  correlation  studies.      Exemplar  Cases  -­‐  Videogames  :  Almost  every  time  a  major  shooting  massacre  occurs,  the  question  of  whether  violent  video  games  stimulated  the  shooter  to  commit  this  crime  is  raised.  The  evidence  on  to  what  extent  violent  games  do  stimulate  real-­‐life  violence  is  variable,  and  this  will  be  displayed  in  an  infographic.  Alongside  this,  there  will  be  cases  of  violent  videogames,  to  illustrate  the  extent  of  the  market.  Also,  there  will  be  videos  of  gameplay  of  a  DOOM2  'Harris  Level',  which  was  made  by  one  of  the  shooters  in  the  columbine  high  school  massacre,  and  of  gameplay  of  'Grant  Theft  Auto',  a  modern  violent  game  often  suggested  to  stimulate  criminal  behaviour.  This  display  is  placed  close  to  the  Columbine  High  School  Massacre  shared  case.      -­‐  Psychological  traits:  In  many  films,  criminals  are  portrayed  as  psychopaths.  Though  there  is  indeed  a  correlation  between  mental  illness  and  crime,  the  real  story  is  much  more  subtle  than  that.  This  case  will  provide  an  overview  of  the  popular  notions  the  current  evidence  on  links  between  psychological  traits  and  crime.  Furthermore,  it  will  ask  the  question  to  what  extent  even  having  some  'psychopath'  characteristics  has  to  be  bad,  as  such  traits  might  also  help  you  be  a  good  doctor,  army  sergeant  or  police  officer.  In  an  interactive,  people  can  take  a  'psychopath  challenge',  to  see  how  they  score  on  the  'psychopath  scale'.  Objects  will  include  film  posters,  the  famous  'ink  blot  tests'  and  a  copy  of  the  DSM  IV  on  mental  illnesses.    -­‐  Body  types:  In  recent  days,  a  number  of  studies  have  been  performed  that  show  some  degree  of  correlation  between  body  types  and  aggression.  As  it  is  the  modern  day  variant  of  studying  people's  physical  appearance  to  tell  their  personality,  this  case  is  be  placed  close  to  the  historical  sub-­‐theme  of  physiognomy,  phrenology  and  atavism.  A  recent  study  that  showed  that  ice  hockey  players  with  wider  facer  were  more  aggressive  during  the  game  will  be  a  focus  point.  This  case  will  also  include  an  interactive  that  allows  people  to  see  where  on  the  spectrum  their  own  face  width  lies.  

30  

Subtheme 3d – The Biology Underneath Caus

es?  

Area  A  –  Brains    A1  

This  area  will  look  into  the  latest  research  results  on  brains  and  criminal  behaviour.  Most  significantly,  it  will  tell  the  story  of  the  prefrontal  cortex  as  the  'guardian  angel'  of  our  behaviour,  and  the  limbic  system  as  the  impulsive  criminal.  It  will  also  focus  on  how  exactly  science  is  finding  such  answer  to  the  question  of  our  brains  and  criminal  behaviour.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Mini-­‐documentary  with   James   Fallon,  who   studies   criminal   brains   and   found   that   he  himself  has  a  'criminal  brain',  as  is  shown  in  area  A1.  This  will  explain  the  role  of  the  brain  areas.    -­‐  3d  assemble  and  disassemble  model  that  highlights  the  brain  areas  now  known  to  be  involved  in  controlling  our  (criminal)  behaviour.  -­‐  Models  of  fMRI  scanner  used  in  many  of  the  brain  research  studies.      

Introduction  Introduction  Though  studies  into  correlates  and  causes  can  give  us  useful  indication  of  what  outside  factors  link  with  crime,  science  has  also  gone  one  step  further  in  trying  to  explain  why  certain  people  commit  crime,  by  exploring  what  goes  on  inside  people.  Both  in  the  field  of  neurology  and  genetics,  steps  are  being  made  that  might  bring  us  closer  to  understanding  what  causes  crime.    

A2  

This  wall  will  display  a  large  print  of  the  brain  scan  of  James  Fallon,  a  scientist  who  studies  the  brain  of  criminals,  and  found  out  that  his  own  is  characteristic  of  a  criminal  brain.  This  image  is  interesting  because  it  shows  that  even  though  there  is  such  a  thing  as  a  brain  that  predisposes  to  criminal  behaviour,  this  does  not  necessarily  mean  you  are  a  criminal.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  mini-­‐documentary  with  James  Fallon,  who  studies  criminal  brains  and  found  that  he  himself  has  a  'criminal  brain',  as   is  shown  in  area  A1.  This  will  explain  the  role  of  the  brain  areas.    -­‐   3d   assemble   and   disassemble   model   that   highlights   the   brain   areas   now  known  to  be  involved  in  controlling  our  (criminal)  behaviour.  -­‐  models  of  fMRI  scanner  used  in  many  of  the  brain  research  studies.    

31  

Display  area  B2  This  wall  will  hold  a  large  print  of  the  full  chromosome  set  of  humans,  with  those  areas  where  genes  that  associate  with  criminal  behaviour  have  been  found,  highlighted.

Subtheme 3d – The Biology Underneath Caus

es?  

Area  B  –  Genes  B1  

Increasingly,  science  is  finding  out  that  criminal  behaviour  does  to  some  extent  seem  to  be  inheritable,  and  even  more  impressively,  it  is  finding  single  genes  that  associate  with  criminal  behaviour.  This  area  will  investigate  the  basis  of  this  genetic  side  to  criminal  behaviour,  including  the  'warrior  gene'  MOA-­‐A,  certain  variants  of  which  have  been  associated  with  violent  behaviour.  It  will  also  look  into  how  science  is  uncovering  such  aspects.    Exemplar  Objects  criminal  and  violent  behaviour  can  be  inherited  -­‐  Live  fruit  flies.  Live  specimens  of  fruit  fly  strains  that  were  bred  in  an  experiment  showing  that  within  about  20  generation,  you  can  create  both  very  aggressive  and  very  docile  fruit  flies.  The  fruit  flies  will  be  seen  fighting  to  defend  their  territories  to  certain  extents.  If  not  possible,  videos  of  the  original  experiment  are  available.  -­‐  James  Fallon  family  tree.  James  Fallon,  the  scientist  with  the  'criminal  brain',  has  a  whole  family  history  of  violent  behaviour,  starting  with  the  famous  case  of  of  lizzy  borden,  who  killed  her  father  and  stepmother  with  an  axe  in  1892.    the  MOA-­‐A  'warrior  gene'  -­‐  Mouse  experiment  where  they  deleted  this  gene,  resulting  in  highly  aggressive  mice.    -­‐  Stuffed  mice  from  fighting  -­‐  Video  on  behaviour  -­‐  Infographic  in  difference  in  behaviour  -­‐    Infographic  showing  that  certain  variants  of  the  MOA-­‐A  gene,  when  combined      with  maltreatment  in  childhood,  result  in  higher  incidence  of  criminality  in  adulthood    Finding  specific  genes  -­‐  Pictures  of  machines  used  in  genetic  testing  -­‐  Video  clip  illustrating  how  genetic  testing  works  

B2  This  wall  will  hold  a  large  print  of  the  full  chromosome  set  of  humans,  with  those  areas  where  genes  that  associate  with  criminal  behaviour  have  been  found,  highlighted.  

32  

Room 4 – Cure or Conviction?

Subcategories  

Introduction  The  attempt  of  science  to  determine  the  biological  cause  of  criminality  in  the  past  centuries  have  raised  controversial  issues  and  sometimes  led  to  unbearable  extremes.  However,  the  progress  made  today  by  science  in  this  field    could  help  dealing  with  crime  by  preventing  it  and  assessing  responsibility.  Some  think  science  could  even  cure  criminals:  but  would  that  be  ethical?      In  the  past,  scientific  theories  about  the  neurobiological  origin  of  criminality    were  used  to  back  up  controversial  measures  against  criminals.  But  now,  it  could  actually  change  the  way  science  is  done  and  the  way  society  sees  criminals.  This  final  room  reflects  on  the  ambiguous  relationship  between  science,  criminology  and  society.    

Display  This  room  offers  a  “chronological”  narrative:  the  first  area  focus  on  preventing  the  crime  before  it  happened,  then  the  visitor  enters  the  second  area  displayed  as  a  courtroom  and  finally  the  last  area  address  the  question  of  what  we  do  with  criminals  once  they  have  been  convicted.  This  area  is  open  and  allows  a  fluid  movement  of  visitors,  namely  because  this  space  is  used  for  the  lunch  workshop  activities  about  profiling  and  criminology.  The  different  areas  are  distinguished  by  the  fact  that  the  wall  of  the  central  area  will  be  darker  and  the  lights  dimmer  in  order  to  convey  the  solemn  atmosphere  of  a  court  room.    

 Cure  or

 Con

viction?  

Subcategories  Preventing  Crime  -­‐  Eugenics  and  Sterilization  -­‐  Spotting  Violent  Childs  -­‐  Tracking  Criminals  Science  in  Courtroom  -­‐  The  Imbecile  Criminal  and  the  Insanity  Defence  -­‐  Brian  Dugan  Case  Study  -­‐  Be  the  judge  -­‐  Electric  Chair      

Towards  a  Cure?  -­‐  Medical  Treatments  -­‐  Let  Them  Speak  their  Minds  

33  

Subtheme 4a – Preventing Crime

Cure  or  C

onviction?  

Area  A  –  Eugenics  and  Sterilization    The  idea  explored  in  the  previous  room  that  biology  could  play  a  role  in  a  person’s  potential  to  commit  a  crime  led  to  extreme  interpretations.  This  area  focuses  on  the  case  of  eugenics  in  the  United  States,  a  social  movement  that  originated  in  the  19th  century  claiming  to  improve  the  genetic  features  of  human  populations  through  selective  breeding  and  sterilization.  The  aim  of  this  case  is  to  underline  that  if  eugenics  connoted  Nazism  to  most  of  us,  former  inmates  sterilized  by  the  U.S  government  are  still  alive  today  as  sterilization,  in  some  states  such  as  North  Carolina,  were  not  declared  illegal  before  1977.          This  case  is  shared  with  the  last  subsection  of  the  Room  3  as  it  relates  directly  to  the  idea  that  criminality  may  be  genetically  driven.  This  shared  case  allow  the  visitor  to  put  its  content  in  two  different  perspectives  and  contexts.      Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Picture  of  famous  criminal  couples  (e.g  Bonnie  and  Clyde)  -­‐  Map  of  eugenics  sterilization  legislation  in  the  U.S  -­‐  Commemorative  Sign  in  South  Carolina  denouncing  the  actions  of  the  eugenics  board  -­‐  Video  of    "Tomorrow's  Children":  a  1934  movie  about  the  practice  of  sterilization  in  the  United  States.    -­‐  Sterilization  instruments  used  in  Auschwitz    -­‐  Quote  from  The  Disease  of  Society  by  G.  Lydston  in  1904  written  on  the  case:  “The  confirmed  criminals  is  simply  excrementitious  matter  that  should  not  only  be  eliminated,  but  placed  beyond  the  possibility  of  its  contaminating  the  body  social”    

Introduction  Introduction  This  sub-­‐themes  underlines  the  controversial  nature  of  the  relationship  between  science  and  criminology.  In  some  ways,  the  idea  that  criminality  could  be  linked  to  genetics  and  neurobiology  implies  that  a  crime  could  be  prevented  before  it  happened.  For  instance,    promoters  of  eugenics  theories  in  the  United  States  advocated  for  a  systematic  sterilization  of    criminals  in  order  to  prevent  the  perpetuation  of  criminal  generations.  Nowadays,  scientific  studies  suggest  that  children  as  young  as  two  could  be  identified  as  potential  future  criminals:  is  it  a  good  or  a  bad  thing?      

34  

Subtheme 4a – Preventing Crime

Cure  or  C

onviction?  

Area  B  –  Spotting  Violent  Child  This  small  area  looks  at  the  critical   juncture  where  scientific  developments   in  both  genetics  and  neuroscience  may  soon  be  able   to   identify   children  with  a  greatly   increased   risk  of  engaging   in   future   violent   activity.   Content   will   namely  include  material  from  the  experiment  made  at  the  University  of  Pennsylvania  in  2011  that  saw  in  the  brains  of  3  years  old  children  signs  of  potential  trouble  in  the  future.  The  text  will  draw   the   visitor’s   attention   on   the   impact   that   such  “marking”  could  have  on  the  children’s  life.                                  Exemplar  Objects  -­‐   Drawings  made   by   child  with   violent   behaviour,   provided  by  the  London  Child  and  Family  Therapy  Center.    -­‐  Copy  of  William  Golding’s  book  Lord  of  the  flies      

Area  B  –  Spotting  Violent  Child  

Area  C  –  Tracking  Criminals  This  area  examines  the  tools  that  were  designed  in  order  to  catch  criminals  and  asks  the  following  question:  is  it  reliable  science?    

C1    This  case  will  be  split  in  two  shelves  that  compare  criminological  tools  developed  in  the  19th  century  by  the  French  policeman  Bertillon  with  the  objects  currently  used  by  forensics.  Bertillon  used  scientific  method  of  classification   to   catch   criminals.  His  methods   relying   on  phrenology   and  behaviourism  were   abandoned  but   some  of   his   inventions,   such   as   the   face   and   side   photographs   and   fingerprints   identification  were  largely  used,  sometimes  raising  ethical  concerns.    This  case  is  shared  with  the  first  subsection  of  the  Room  3  that  deals  with  the  evolution  of  criminological  studies.  This  shared  case  allow  the  visitor  to  put  its  content  in  two  different  perspectives  and  contexts.      Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Anthropometric  document  of  a    tzigane  women,  1912  -­‐  Bertillon’s  anthropometrical  toolbox  compared  with  a  forensic  investigation  toolbox  

Subcategories  

C2:  Interactives    This  interactive  space  aims  at  underlining  the  subjective  nature  of  some  methods  currently  used  to  find  and  classify  criminals.  3  different  activities  are  proposed  to  the  visitors:    -­‐  Lie  to  me:  On  an  interactive  screen,  two  pictures  of  a  smiling  person  are  shown,  one  is  a  fake  smile,  the  other  is  an  honest  smile,  and  the  visitor  must  guess  which  of  the  two  picture  is  a  real  smile.  This  game  relies  on  the  fact  that  a  real,  spontaneous  smile  incorporates  tiny  muscles  around  the  eye  that  are  nearly  impossible  to  contract  at  will.  -­‐  Portrait  Robot:  A  visitor  describes  a  person  he  sees  on  a  picture  to  another  visitor  that  uses  a  software  to  recreate  the  face  as  accurately  as  possible.   35  

Subtheme 4b – Science in the Courtroom

Cure  or  C

onviction?  

Area  A  –  Assessing  Responsibility  This   area   address   the   question   of   the   responsibility   of   the   criminals   by   focusing   on   two  special  cases:    A1:  The  criminal  imbecile    In   the   late   19th   century   and   the   early   20th   century   as   a   consequence   of   the   eugenics  movement   arise   the   concept   of   the   “criminal   imbecile”   from   which   society   had   to   be  protected.  The  main  studies  on  the  subject  by  Dr.  Henry  Goddard  in  the  first  quarter  of  the  20th   century   combined   "criminals,   defectives,   and   delinquents"   into   a   single   category.   In  1913,   The  Mental   Deficiency   Act   established   that   “moral   imbecile”  were   now   to   be   dealt  with  in  special  institutions  to  be  created  under  the  Act,  rather  than  in  prisons.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  I.  Q  Binet  test  popularized  by  Dr.  Henry  Goddard.    -­‐  Copy  of  Goddard’s  book:  The  imbecile  criminals    -­‐  Copy  of  the  Mental  deficiency  Act    -­‐  Miniature  model  of  Broadmoor  Institution,  the  UK  high  security  hospital.    

Introduction  

Introduction  By  revealing  the  role  of  brain  abnormalities  in  crime,  science  steps  into  a  philosophical  quandaries:  does  it  reduce  a  person’s  responsibility  for  his  or  her  own  actions?  If  neurological  and  genetic  factors  out  of  a  person's  control  contribute  to  criminal  offending,  do  we  need  to  rethink  how  they  are  punished?    The  cases  of  this  sub  theme  are  placed  in  a  way  that  aims  at  connoting  the  atmosphere  of  a  court  room.  This  is  emphasised  by  the  presence  of  an  actual  courtroom  furniture  at  the  very  end  of  the  room.  The  long  cases  are  brightly  lit  and  display  a  large  number  of  objects  placed  under  plastic  seal,  as  if  they  were  evidences  stored  in  the  basement  of  a  judicial  institution.    

A2  :  The  Insanity  defence    In  criminal  trials,  the  insanity  defence  is  where  the  defendant  claims  they  are  not  responsible  for  their  actions  due  to  mental  health  problems.  In  the  UK,  The  first  famous  legal  test  for  insanity  came  in  1843,  in  the  McNaughton  case.  Englishman  Daniel  McNaughton   shot   and   killed   the   secretary   of   the   British   Prime  Minister.  The  court  acquitted  McNaughton  "by  reason  of  insanity,"  and  he  was  placed  in  a  mental   institution   for   the   rest   of   his   life.   The   McNaughton   rule   became   the  standard  for  insanity  in  the  United  States  and  the  United  Kingdom,  and  is  still  the  standard  for  insanity  in  almost  half  of  the  states.    Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Straightjacket  from  the  movie  “Fly  over  a  cuckoo’s  nest”  -­‐   Engraving   of   Daniel   M'Naghten   which   appeared   in   the   Scottish   Reformer's  Gazette  in  1843.  -­‐  Picture  and  coat  of  Daniel  Sickles,  a  New  York  politician  who  murdered  his  wife  and  was  found  not  guilty  after  pleading  “temporary  insanity”.  It   is  the  first  case  of  insanity  plea  in  the  U.S.  

36  

Subtheme 4b – Science in the Courtroom

Cure  or  C

onviction?  

Area  B  –  The  Brian  Dugan  Case  Study  This  area  focuses  on  the  work  of    Kent  Kiehl,  professor  of  psychology,  neuroscience  and  law,  who  claims  that  society  must  stop  stigmatizing  criminals  and  should  focus  on  finding  them  treatments  rather  than  trying  to  assess  their  culpability.  He  explains  that  it  is  the  emotional  circuits  that  stop  people  from  committing  crimes,  but  that  in  psychopaths  those  break  don’t  work.  That’s  what  he  explained  as  a  witness  in  the  Brain  Dugan  case  in  1995,  the  first  case  to  accept  a  brain  scan  as  evidence.  But  how  do  we  assess  psychopathy?  Persons  suffering  from  alcoholism  and  depression  also  have  abnormal  brains,  shall  they  also  be  judged  differently  if  they  commit  murder?    

 Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Drawings  of  the  Brian  Dugan  trial  along  with  his  inmate  outfit    -­‐  The  three  picture  of  the  Kiehl’s  test  during  which  subjects  must  rate  whether  the  picture  is  a  moral  violation.  Both  psychopaths  and  the  average  person  rank  the  KKK  with  a  burning  cross  as  a  moral  violation.  But  when  a  normal  person  sees  a  morally  objectionable  photo,  his  limbic  system  lights  up,  but  the  brain  of  the  psychopath  doesn’t  -­‐  fMRI  of  the  brains  of  3  persons  suffering  respectively  from  alcoholism,  depression  and  psychopathy  -­‐  Details  of  the  Hare  psychopathy  checklist  which  measures  traits  such  as  the  inability  to  feel  empathy  or  remorse,  along  with  pictures  representing  how  society  interpret  psychopathy.    -­‐  Infographic  showing  the  prison  population  in  UK  and  the  proportion  of  inmates  diagnosed  with  psychopathy.      

37  

Subtheme 4b – Science in the Courtroom

Cure  or  C

onviction?  

Area  B  –  Be  the  Judge  This  area  displays  a  courtroom  furniture  and  more  precisely  the  place  where  the  judge  sits  during  a  trial.  This  furniture  is  an  invitation  to  the  visitor  to  sit  and  look  back  at  the  evidence  in  a  global  way.    

Area  B  –  Spotting  Violent  Child  

Area  D  –  Electric  Chair  This  area  displays  an  electric  chair  from  the  Ohio  Police  department  museum  which  executed  361  inmates  from  1897  to  1963.  This  object  aims  at  underlining  that  in  some  States  of  the  U.S.,  assessing  the  responsibility  of  a  criminal  is  even  more  important  that  his  life  is  at  stake.  It  is  also  a  dramatic  way  of  pointing  out  that  society,  in  his  will  to  deal  with  crime  sometimes  adopt  radical  solutions.    La  justice  et  la  revanche  poursuivant  le  crime,    

Pierre-­‐Paul  Prud'hon,  1867    

38  

Subtheme 4c – Towards a Cure?

Cure  or  C

onviction?  

Area  A  –  Medical  Treatments  This  case  aims  at  giving  an  overview  on  the  sensible  issue  of  finding  a  medical  treatment  for  criminals:  if  we  found  such  a  therapy,    Would  it  be  ethical,  or  even  legal,  to  compel  people  with  a  violent  history  to  have  the  treatment?  The  famous  book  and    movie  Clockwork  orange  addresses   this   question   when   Alex,   the   violent   anti-­‐hero,   is   cured   from   his   criminal  behaviour   thanks   to   the   Ludovico   technique,   a   fictional   aversion   therapy   which   involves  forcing  a  patient  to  watch,  through  the  use  of  specula  to  hold  the  eyes  open,  violent  images  for  long  periods  of  time,  while  under  the  effect  of  a  nausea  -­‐inducing  drug.  The  lobectomy  and  convulsive  electroshocks  used  in  the  past  to  annihilate  criminal's  pulsions  are  not  very  far  from  this  fiction.      Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  An  electroconvulsive  therapy  machine  from  1945  -­‐  Tools  used  to  perform  lobectomy  -­‐  Objects  and  pictures  from  the  movie  Clockwork  Orange.  

Introduction  

Introduction  If   violent  behaviour   is  at   least  partly  neurological   in  origin,   that   raises   the  question  of  whether   some  sort  of  medical   treatment  might  be  able   to  mitigate  or  even  eliminate   that  contributing  factor,  and  thus  prevent  the  person  from  committing  future  crimes.  Maybe  one  day,  criminality  will  cease    to  be  viewed  within  a  moral  and  social  context  and  more  within   the  humanitarian   context  of   treatment,   as  was   the   case   for   epilepsy   and  psychosis.  But   for  now,  no  effective  drug  has  been   found  and  psychotherapy   remains   the  most  effective  way  of  dealing  with  criminal  minds.    

"Sometimes  I  just  want  to  start  again,  I  want  to  be  a  blank  canvas"    

Area  B  –  Let  them  Speak  their  Minds  This  area  displays  the  artwork  produced  by  inmates  in  the  context  of  the  Mirrors  Prison  Portraits  exhibition    launched  by  Inspiring  Change,  a  project  designed  to  prove  the  beneficial  impact  of  art  projects  on  offenders.  This  area  illustrates  the  fact  that  for  many  psychotherapists,  inducing  criminals  to  reflect  on  their  acts  remains,  so  far,    the  best  treatment.      Exemplar  Objects  -­‐  Paintings  and  picture  from  the  Inspiring  Change  project  with  quotes  from  the  participant  reflecting  on  their  actions.      

39  

Events

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

Opening  Event  –  Screenings  

Throughout  the  opening  night,  there  will  be  screenings  of  cultural  performances  by  (ex)convicts.    Jesus  Hopped  the  A  Train  A  play  by  Synergy  Theatre  Project  in  London,  an  arts  charity  that  promotes  the  rehabilitation  of  prisoners  through  plays.  The  play  is  a  blistering  exploration  of  faith,  redemption  and  desperation,  set  in  the  segregation  unit  of  Riker's  Island  prison    Me,  them  and  us    A  contemporary  dance  show  performed  at  Bernie  Grant  Arts  Centre  by  the  London  Academy  of  Dance  united,  an  association  that  works  with  delinquent  teenagers.    Jail  Guitar  Doors  A  jam  by  convicts  of  the  Guys  Marsh  prison  Dorset    The  forgiveness  project  A  series  of  short  films  created  by  prisoners  chronicling  their  life  stories  and  ideas  around  forgiveness  in  the  context  of  a  digital  media  course  run  at  High  Down  prison  in  Surrey  during  2008-­‐9.      

Introduction  Different  events  will  accompany  the  exhibition.  These  events  aim  at  highlighting  some  aspects  of  the  exhibition  and  give  a  visibility  to  former  and  present  convicts.    

Open  Late  -­‐  Murder  Mystery        (Thursday  evening,  7-­‐10  pm)    

This   event  will   invite   the   audience   to   take   part   to   a  Murder  Mystery   night  around  the  theme  of  criminal  minds.  This  event  will  be  the  final  product  of  a  collaborative   project   between   The  Wellcome   Trust   Collection   and   selected  students   in   Psychology   (UCL),   History   (King’s   College),   Neuroscience   and  Science  Communication  (Imperial).    

40  

Events

Lecture  :  The  biological  roots  of  crime  (Weekday  evening,  6-­‐8pm)    

An  evening  lecture  with  British  psychologist  Adrian  Raine  who  currently  holds  the  chair  of  Professor  of  Criminology  &  Psychiatry  in  the  Department  of  Criminology  of  the  School  of  Arts  and  Sciences  at  the  University  of  Pennsylvania.  On  this  occasion,  he  will  expose  the  ideas  presented  in  his  new  book:  The  Anatomy  of  Violence  (30th  April  2013)  

Films:  4  week  Selection  of  films  relating  to  the  exhibition  (Saturday  evening,  7.30-­‐9pm)  Each  week,  a  film  related  to  the  exhibition  will  be  screened.  Before  the  start  of  every  film,  there  will  be  a  short  relevant  talk  by  a  prominent  speaker.  

 Frankenstein:  A  tale  about  criminal  minds  Speaker  :  David  Kirby,  author  of  The  Devil  in  our  DNA  :  A  Brief  History  of  Eugenic  in  Science-­‐fiction  Films    Of  Mice  and  Men  :  The  ‘feeble  minded’  criminal  and  the  question  of  responsibility  Speaker  :  Leeanne  McGee,  executive  director  of  high  secure  services  at  Broadmoor  Hospital.    Bowling  for  Columbine:  Is  society  creating  criminals?  Speaker  :  Emanuel  Tanay,  american  forensic  psychiatrist,  author  of  the  study  Virginia  Tech  Mass  Murder      Clockwork  Orange:  Can  we  cure  violent  behaviour?    Speaker  :  L.MacReynolds,  co-­‐author  of  the  study  A  cure  for  crime:  can  mental  health  treatment  diversion  reduce  crime  among  youth?  

Debate  :  Does  science  have  a  role  to  play  in  court?  (Weekday  evening,  6-­‐8pm)  

Dr  A.  Kiehl,  Associate  Professor  of  Psychology  and  Neuroscience  at  the  University  of  New  Mexico  has  established  the  world’s  largest  database  of  brain  data  from  incarcerated  populations  and  has  testified  in  many  court  case.  After  giving  a  tour  of  the  A  Cure  or  a  Conviction?  section,  he  will  animate  a  debate  with  the  audience  about  the  legitimacy  of  science  to  provide  evidence  in    court  rooms.    

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

41  

Evaluation

Subcategories  

We  conducted  a  short  formative  evaluation  to  answer  a  number  of  specific  questions  related  to  the  exhibition.  The  most  significant  results  are  discussed  on  the  two  pages  below.  Full  details  of  the  questionnaire  and  results  can  be  found  on  the  following  pages.  

Comfort  with  Potentially  Disturbing  Images  Certain   content   of   our   exhibition   is   potentially   disturbing   to   visitors.   In   order   to  getting   better   insight   into   how   to   deal  with   such   content,  we   looked   into   people’s  comfort  with  images,  and  if  they  felt  it  should  get  special  treatment.    Results  and  Implications  A   large  majority   of   the   people   we   interviewed   felt   neutral   towards   the   images   we  showed   them,  and   felt   they   required  no  special   treatment.  Some  of   them  explained  that  visitors  going  to  such  an  exhibition  would  know  what  to  expect  from  it.  However,  a  majority  of  people  considered  that  pictures  dealing  with  executions  and  dissections  of  convict’s  heads  should  have  a  warning,  but  they  did  not  think   it  was  necessary  to  put   it   into   a   separate   area.   Following   this   survey,   we   decided   to   replace   the   child  remains  contents,  as  they  were  not  necessary,  and  to  include  a  sign  at  the  start  of  the  exhibition.  

79%  

17%  

3%   1%  

Average  comfort  level  over  all  images  

Neutral    Somewhat  uncomfortable  

12  9  

5   5   4  2  

0   0  0  

5  

10  

15  

20  

Number  of  ratings  within  discomfort  zone  (somewhat,  moderately,  very)  

Out  of  20  

Subcategories  

Interest  in  voicing  and  seeing  other’s  opinion  We   feel   our   exhibition   topic   is   well   suited   to   using   an   exhibition   as   a   discussion  platform  using  interactives.  In  order  to  design  such  interactives  efficiently,  we  asked  20   people   to   rate   their   interest   in   voicing   their   opinion   and   seeing   other   people’s  opinion  on  four  different  themes.    Results  and  Implications  The   results   told  us   that  people  where  not   really   interested   in   voicing   their  opinion  about  what  is  a  crime,  but  would  still  like  to  hear  other’s  opinion.  On  the  contrary,  a  majority  of  them  would  like  to  tell  their  opinion  on  what  ‘  good  and  bad’  are,  yet  they  are  not  really  interested  in  seeing  other  people’s  opinion  on  this  topic.    The  persons  that   were   interviewed   expressed   a   great   interest   for   the   role   of   science   in   court.    Therefore,  we  decided  to  host  a  debate  on  this  specific  subject.  

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

42  

B1-­‐  In  our  law  

Evaluation

Interest  in  Reading  Area  Initially,  we  didn’t  plan  on  including  a  feedback  area/reading  room    in  our  exhibition,  as  neither   of   us   are   personally   interested   in   such   facilities.   However,   to   check   if   other  people  share  this  opinion,  we  decided  to  look  into  people’s  interest  in  a  potential  reading  area.    Results  and  Implications  Event  though  our  survey  showed  that  most  people  had  not  usually  used  reading  facilities  before,  more  than  half  of  the  people  interviewed  expressed  an  interest  in  reading  more  about   the   subject   in   a   reading   area.   Therefore,   we   redesigned     our   introductive/conclusive  space  in  order  to  include  a  shelf  and  a  couch.  

B1-­‐  In  our  law  

Appeal  of  Events  We  will  be  organising  a  number  of  events  to  go  with  out  exhibition.  However,  sometimes  it  can  be  difficult  to  know  what  events  appeal  to  people.  To  maximise  the  number  of  people  attending,  we  decided  to  find  out  how  appealing  the  events  were.    Results  and  Implications  In  general,  people  found  our  events  rather  appealing,  with  a  clear  preference  for  the  murder  mystery.  Thus,  we  didn’t  bring  any  modification  to  the  program.  

37%  

31%  

17%  

15%  

Overall  Appeal  of  events  

Very  appealing  Somewhat  appealing  Not  really  appealing  Not  appealing  at  all  

0  2  4  6  8  10  12  14  

Popularity  of  Individual  Events  Votes  for  ‘  Very  Appealing’    

(out  of  20)  

Crim

inal  M

inds

 

43  

Evaluation

Questionnaire   Crim

inal  M

inds

 

44  

Evaluation

Questionnaire  –  Examples  of  Supporting  Material   Crim

inal  M

inds

 

45  

46  

Emma    Bornebroek  Margaux  Calon  

2013    

47