Pediatric Emergencies Jan Bazner-Chandler RN, MSN, CNS, CPNP.
CPNP-Electronic Product Notification · Type of cosmetic products -Examples of scenarios by...
Transcript of CPNP-Electronic Product Notification · Type of cosmetic products -Examples of scenarios by...
Details of Presentation – Event, Date, Name ……. Further details
Gerald Renner
Cosmetics Europe
CPNP-Electronic Product
Notification
2 Riga – May 2010
1. LEGAL / REGULATORY ASPECTS
3 Riga – May 2010
Situation under the Cosmetics
Directive 76/768/EEC
Unharmonised & multiple notifications throughout
the EU
� Notification to the Competent Authority
�Notification to Poison Centres
4 Riga – May 2010
Situation under the Cosmetics
Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009
Harmonised EU System
� Central notification at European Commission
level
� Notification required for new products and
existing products still on the market
� Responsible person and distributor
obligations
5 Riga – May 2010
Who needs to notify – and to
whom ?
i. Responsible Person - Prior to placing new product on
the market and for existing products
ii. Distributors –When distributor translates the labelling
on his own initiative for sale in another Member State
iii. Responsible Person -When a distributor re-introduces a
product no longer placed on the market by the
responsible person
In all cases :
Notification to central EU portal CPNP
6 Riga – May 2010
What needs to be notified?Responsible Person (RP)
Product category
Product name(s)
Responsible person - name and address
Country of origin (import only)
Member State where product is placed on the market
Details of physical contact person in case necessity
Nanomaterials – identification, exposure conditions
CMRs (1A & 1B) – identification
Frame formulation
Original labelling (only once)
Photograph of original packaging - if reasonably
legible (only once)
Exis
tin
g &
new
pro
du
cts
7 Riga – May 2010
What needs to be notified?Distributor (when translating the labelling)
� Only required when:
A Distributor places a product which has already been placed on the market by RP in a Member State (MS) & from its own initiative, place it in another (MS) and translate the labelling
� Distributor is required to notify the following information:
� Category of cosmetic product
� Product name in the Member State of dispatch
� Product name in the Member State in which it is made available -enabling its specific identification
� The Member State in which the cosmetic product is made available
� Distributor name and address
� The name and address of the responsible person where the product information file is made readily accessible
8 Riga – May 2010
• Distributor informs the responsible person in which member
state he will make the product available
• Responsible person has to notify to the EC portal like a new
product only if the product has not previously been notified in
this Member State (under the old Cosmetics Directive)
What needs to be notified ?Distributor (re-introducing a product)
Product placed
on the market by RP
under
the Cosmetics Directive
Product no longer
on the market
Product re-introduced by distributor
after implementation date
9 Riga – May 2010
Who has access to the notified
Information?
� Product category
� Product name(s)
� Responsible person - name and address
� Country of origin (import only)
� Member State where product is placed on the market
� Details of physical contact person in case necessity
� Nanomaterials – identification, exposure conditions
� CMRs (1A & 1B) – identification
� Original labelling (only once)
� Photograph of original packaging - if reasonably
legible (only once)
� Frame formulation
Co
mp
ete
nt
Au
tho
riti
es
Po
iso
n C
on
tro
l C
en
tres
10 Riga – May 2010
Timeline - Transition Period
24 months
Continued national notification
requirements under Cosmetics
Directive
18 months
Possibility to use EU central
notification under the new
Regulation on both, new and
existing products.
Use of EU system exempts
from national requirements
under the Cosmetics Directive
11 July 201311 January 2012
11 January 2010
Cosmetics Regulation
entered into force
New notification
requirement for new
products
Obligation that all existing
products are notified in the
new EU system
Obligation to notify all
new products in the
new EU system
Obligation for distributors
when translating labelling
or reintroducing products
11 Riga – May 2010
2. PRACTICAL ASPECTS
12 Riga – May 2010
What does CPNP understand
as ‘a product’ ?
A product can be made up from:
• One component (e.g: cream, shampoo …)
• Several components possibly used separately (e.g: make-up
palettes)
• A collection of components intended to be used as a mix or
sequentially (e.g; hair colouring kit, skin peeling kit, permanent
styling product)
• A range of products, as described above, that are only
differentiated by colour shade, smell, or strength can be notified
under one notification
13 Riga – May 2010
Type of cosmetic products - Examples
of scenarios by increasing complexity
4) Kit products
Hair colour
2) Shaded /fragrance variant
products
Professional Hair colour
Lipstick
3) Composite products
Eye ShadowPalette lips, eyes, cheeks
1) Simple product
Skincare gift sets
ShampooCream
1a)
1b)
14 Riga – May 2010
Some guiding principles
• One notification is linked to one cosmetic product
• One cosmetic product is linked to one PIF
• One product covered in one PIF may be comprised of several
components
• One product information file may, in some cases, be linked to
several variants (e.g: shades, smells, etc.)
• One product can occur in various pack sizes
� One notification maybe comprise
�several components (e.g. oxidative hair dye)
�several variants (e.g: shades, smells, etc.)
�several pack sizes
15 Riga – May 2010
� Sets that group together a number of products, each of
which are also sold separately:
� cannot be notified under one notification.
� each product needs to be notified separately
� However, multi-component products (e.g. permanent
hair dyes) for which the components are not sold
individually:
� have to be notified as under one notification
Sets & Kits
16 Riga – May 2010
What needs to be notified?Responsible Person (RP)
Product category
Product name(s)
Responsible person - name and address
Country of origin (import only)
Member State where product is placed on the market
Details of physical contact person in case necessity
Nanomaterials – identification, exposure conditions
CMRs (1A & 1B) – identification
Frame formulation
Original labelling (only once)
Photograph of original packaging - if reasonably
legible (only once)
Exis
tin
g &
new
pro
du
cts
17 Riga – May 2010
1. Product Category
Categorisation
• 4 Level 1
• 22 Level 2
• 82 Level 3
18 Riga – May 2010
2. Product Name(s)
• Cosmetic name or names, enabling its specific
identification“ � i.e. enabling the differentiation of products
of the same product line
• If the same product is on the market under different
(translated) names, all names in the different languages
have to be notified
• Industry interpretation:
Information on the side or back of the packaging (e.g.
translated product function) should only be considered as
part of the product name if it is indispensible for the
unique identification of the product.
19 Riga – May 2010
3. & 4. Responsible Person and
Contact Person
• Responsible Person : filled out automatically by
CPNP
• Contact person details to contact in case
necessity• Name
• Address
• contact numbers
• Could be a person or a department
• This is not an emergency contact ! No need to
have a tox expert on standby 24/7 who is able
to speak in all 21 EU languages.
20 Riga – May 2010
5. Country of Origin
• For imported products only
• If the same product is being “made in”
in two or more countries ---> the
system currently requires separate
notifications
21 Riga – May 2010
6. Member State where product
is placed on the market
• One-off action
• Only one country needs to be identified, i.e. the
country of first making available
• If a product is placed simultaneously in several
countries (or is already on the market in July 2013)
� company choice of one Member State
• CPNP is not meant to be a product distribution
database !
22 Riga – May 2010
7. Nanomaterial
• Identification
� Name - INCI
� CAS number
� EC Number (EINECS or ELINCS)
� IUPAC Name
� INN
� XAN
• Exposure type : Rinse off/ Leave on
• Exposure route
� Oral
� Dermal
� Inhalation
23 Riga – May 2010
8. CMR (1A or 1B)
� Definition: Substances classified under chemical legislation as:
�Carcinogenic
�Mutagenic
�Reprotoxic
� Identification only
�Name, CAS #
�Only the CMR from “harmonised” classification
(Annex VI of Regulation on Classification and
labelling CLP)
24 Riga – May 2010
9. Frame Formulations
• Cosmetics Europe collaborated closely with
European Association of Poison Control Centres
• Starting Point : SYSDECOS, version 2000
• Frame formulations consist of
– lists of category / function of certain ingredients and
their maximum concentration in the cosmetic product
– Additional indication of specific substances with exact
concentration (high concern for poison centres)
• Alternatively : notification of Exact Formula or
Concentration Ranges
25 Riga – May 2010
10. Original Labelling
A one-off operation
Label:
• refers to a copy of the artwork of the outer packaging of the
product if there is a primary container and an outer
packaging….
• otherwise it is the artwork of the primary container”
Original:
• “refers to the first language / country version of the product
that was placed on the market …
• If the product was simultaneously launched in several
countries, you can chose which version you notify”
26 Riga – May 2010
11. Photograph of Packaging
A one-off operation
Photograph of packaging - if reasonably legible
� “Refers to a photograph of the outer packaging of the
product if there is a primary container and an outer
packaging
� Otherwise it is the photograph of the primary container”
Industry Interpretation:
“The photograph is in principle only necessary if it is legible
and provides more relevant information than the artwork”
27 Riga – May 2010
The logic behind the CPNP PortalPart I General Information
28 Riga – May 2010
The logic behind the CPNP PortalPart II Product Details – CMR & Nanomaterial
29 Riga – May 2010
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
CPNP Relevant pre-selection OR "Other".
In this case the user specifies the formula/function
in a relevant manner
and CPNP triggers full formula notification
List of physical form of product
a it leaves the container :
* solid / pressed powder
* loose powder
* cream/paste/gel
* Liquid/
*Foam
* Spray
* Other
Physical Form
‘Frame’ Formulation
Name
List of all possible
FF Names
The logic behind the CPNP Portal
Part II Product Details
Category & Frame Formulation (1)
Product Categorisation
30 Riga – May 2010
The logic behind the CPNP Portal
Part II Product Details – Category & Frame
Formulation (2)
Is the product presented
in a special applicator/packaging?
YES / NO
IF “YES”
Chose the specific
applicators/packaging
List of specific
applicators/packaging
Wipe / Sponge / Patch / Pad
Capsule
Pressurised Spray Container
Other
31 Riga – May 2010
The logic behind the CPNP Portal
Part II Product Details – Category & Frame
Formulation (3)
Notification by:
1)Predefined FF
2)Concentration range
3)Exact Concentration
If “1”
FF Number
CPNP: automatically selects the
correct FF number
( From the product category)
List of FF Numbers
If “3”
Full Formula
Depending on the Product
Category, the system asks you
the exact concentration
of specific ingredients of
concern to Poison Centers
CPNP
Filter
Input or attach
Formula with
concentration
ranges
If “2”
Concentration
range
Depending on the Product
Category, the system asks you
the exact concentration
of specific ingredients of
concern to Poison Centers
CPNP
Filter
Input or attach
foormula with
exact
concentration
32 Riga – May 2010
The logic behind the CPNP PortalPart II Product Details – Original Packaging &
Labelling
33 Riga – May 2010
3. LET’S TRY IT OUT IN PRACTICE
https://webgate.acceptance.ec.europa.e
u/cpnp
34 Riga – May 2010
4. SOME OPEN QUESTIONS
35 Riga – May 2010
Open questions
• Availability of CPNP manual in all EU languages
� promised for Q2 2012, including manual for account
management (initial login, creation of suborganisations)
• Possibility for electronic ‘machine-to-machine’
upload
� testing phase foreseen for October 2012
�Needs a lot of IT work on the side of the notifyier to ensure
the data are generated in 100% accurate format for CPNP
� Investment probably only worth in case of very large
• Data security and liability for data leakage at the
level of CPNP (EU) and/or Member States (local)
and/or Poison Centers (local)
36 Riga – May 2010
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR
ATTENTION !
ěOTI PATEICOS