Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals...

44
Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report

Transcript of Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals...

Page 1: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Court of Appeals

2012 Annual Report

Annual Caseload Report

Page 2: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Court of Appeals Glossary 3Court Activity, All Divisions (4) 7Court Activity, Division I (4) 9Court Activity, Division II (4) 11Court Activity, Division III 13History of Filings (1) 15History of Resolutions (1)(2) 17History of Pending Cases 19History of Activity, All Reviews, All Divisions (10) 21History of Activity, All Reviews, Division I (10) 23History of Activity, All Reviews, Division II (10) 25History of Activity, All Reviews, Division III 27Court Activity, All Divisions, Criminal Appeals 29Court Activity, All Divisions, Civil Appeals 31Court Activity, All Divisions, Total Appeals 33Court Activity, All Divisions, Personal Restraint Petitions 35Court Activity, All Divisions, Notices of Discretionary Review 37Days Between Events for Criminal Appeals Pending or Disposed of by Opinion --75th Percentile (1) 39Days Between Events for Civil Appeals Pending or Disposed of by Opinion --75th Percentile(1) 41Days Between Events for Total Appeals Pending or Disposed of by Opinion --75th Percentile (1) 43

Page 2 of 44

Table of Contents

Page 3: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Court of Appeals Glossary

This glossary is included to assist in understanding the statistical tables.

Filings

Notice Of Appeal

- The filing of an appeal of a trial court final judgment that is reviewable as a matter of right. Notices of appeal must be filed within 30days of the trial court judgment. Unless otherwise prohibited by statute or court rule, a party may appeal from only trial court decisionsas specified in Rules of Appellate Procedure (RAP) 2.2. Notices of appeal are categorized into criminal and civil appeals.

Personal Restraint Petition

- The filing of a review to seek relief from limitations on a person's freedom due to current or imminent confinement, or otherrestrictions imposed by a criminal or civil trial court decision (RAP 16.4). Discretionary Review

- The filing of a review of interlocutory orders of a trial court, made prior to a final determination of the case, concerning whethererrors or substantial departure from accepted and usual courses of proceedings occurred in the case. Unless otherwise prohibited bystatute or court rule, a party may seek discretionary review of any act of superior court not appealable as a matter of right (RAP 2.3). Dispositions

The appellate court may reverse, affirm, or modify the decision being reviewed and take any other action as the merits of the case andthe interest of justice may require (RAP 12.2). Each review is counted as being disposed as soon as a decision terminating review isfiled with the appellate clerk.

Opinions

- The statement by the court of the decision reached in regard to a cause argued before it, expounding the law as applied to the case,and detailing the reasons upon which the judgment is based. Opinions Published -

The published written opinion terminating the review. Opinions Unpublished

- The unpublished written opinion terminating the review. Commissioners' Rulings

- Rulings by commissioners which terminate review. Motion On The Merits

Page 4: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

- Termination of a review due to the granting of a motion on the merits (RAP 18.14). Other Rulings

- Other rulings by commissioners, such as rulings on accelerated review of adult sentences or juvenile offender proceedings orgranting a motion to dismiss--Anders (RAP 15.2(h)). Dismissed

- An order issued by the court dismissing the review prior to the point where case merit is determined. The commissioner or clerk maydismiss a review for failure to comply with procedures. The court, on motion of a party, may dismiss a review for want of prosecution,if the review is frivolous, moot or solely for the purpose of delay, or for failure to comply with procedures (RAP 18.9). Transferred/Certified

- The Supreme Court, to promote orderly administration of justice may, on its own initiative or on motion of a party, transfer a casefrom the Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court ("certified"). A case may be transferred from one division to another within the Courtof Appeals (RAP 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, RCW 2.06.030). Review Not Accepted

- Reviews may not be accepted if they do not meet the conditions governing the acceptance of review (RAP 2.2, 2.3, and 16.4). Other Terminations

- An order issued by the court terminating the review before an opinion is rendered. An order to terminate a review would result if, forexample, a petitioner decided to withdraw the review. Pending Cases Case Stayed

- Those cases temporarily arrested or removed from judicial processing by order of the court. Brief Not Filed

- Those cases within the stages of perfection in which no briefs have yet been filed. Appellant Brief Filed

- Those cases within the stages of perfection in which appellant's brief has been filed, but respondent's brief is still awaited. Respondent Brief Filed

- Those cases within the stages of perfection in which both appellant's brief and respondent's brief have been filed, but case has yet tobe set on the court calendar for review. Remanded To Trial Court

- Those cases whose jurisdiction have been temporarily returned to the trial court of origination. Set For Motion On The Merits

- Those cases which have progressed to the point at which all briefs were filed and served, and now qualify for setting. Because a

Page 5: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

motion on the merits has been made, these cases have been set on the Motion On The Merits calendar (RAP 18.14). Ruling Referred To Panel

- Cases which were initially assigned to a commissioner, who has ruled that they should be referred to a panel of judges for a decision. Set For Oral Argument

- Those cases which have progressed to the point at which all briefs were filed and served and have been set for a review. Opinion/Order In Process

- Those cases which have been reviewed by the court but have yet to receive a decision.

Mandated

A review is mandated by the clerk of the Court of Appeals when a written notification, when required, is sent to the trial court and allparties. The notification informs all parties of an appellate court decision terminating the review.

Time In Process Statistics --Notice Of Appeals Filing

- The date the appeal is filed in the trial court. Statement Of Arrangements

- The date of the first occurrence when the Statement Of Arrangements has either been "Received" or "Filed" in the appellate court. Report Of Proceedings

- The date of the first occurrence when the Report Of Proceedings has either been "Filed" or "Received." The latter is recorded whenthe report is returned from the printer. Note: For statistical purposes "Received" is only employed when "Filed" is omitted. Appellant's Brief

- The date of the last occurrence for the Appellant's Brief to either be "Filed" or "Received." The latter is recorded when the report isreturned from the printer. Note: For statistical purposes "Received" is only employed when "Filed" is omitted. Respondent's Brief

- The date of the last occurrence for the Respondent's Brief to either be "Filed" or "Received." The latter is recorded when the report isreturned from the printer. Note: For statistical purposes "Received" is only employed when "Filed" is omitted. Oral Argument

- The date of the first occurrence that the oral argument received a status of "Heard." Opinion

- The date of the first occurrence of the opinion being filed. Mandate

Page 6: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

- A written notification by the clerk of the appellate court to the trial court and to the parties of an appellate court decision terminatingreview.

Note that the time-in-process tables have been changed in 1997 to reflect the 75th percentile rather than the median number of daysbetween events. The change was made for consistency with national standards.

Page 7: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions (4) - 2012 Annual Report

Page 1 of 2

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Appeals - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Other Reviews - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AllReviewsTotal

Discretionary Review

Personal RestraintTotalCivilCriminal

FILINGS

1,152 1,328 2,480 830 429 1,259Total Filings 3,739

RESOLUTIONS (5)

128 195 323 6 20 26Opinions Published 349

763 390 1,153 19 24 43Opinions Unpublished 1,196

891 585 1,476 25 44 69Opinion Terminating Review 1,545

8 5 13 778 5 783Dismissed 796

22 19 41 3 5 8Transferred/Certified 49

0 2 2 3 25 28Review Not Accepted 30

3 18 21 47 5 52Other Terminations 73

33 44 77 831 40 871Order Terminating Review 948

66 78 144 0 5 5Decided on Merits 149

166 405 571 87 100 187Dismissed 758

2 0 2 3 1 4Transferred/Certified 6

7 19 26 1 154 155Review Not Accepted 181

26 19 45 6 3 9Other Terminations 54

267 521 788 97 263 360Ruling Terminating Review 1,148

1,191 1,150 2,341 953 347 1,300Total Resolved 3,641

(1) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of resolution types and the various stages of pendingcaseload are not comparable to measurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(2) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays thesetting of cases until there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(3) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(4) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I forpreparation of opinions and mandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts inboth divisions. The opinions for those transferred cases are included in Division I figures, only.(5) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution countsreported. Page 7 of 44

Page 8: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions (4) - 2012 Annual Report

Page 2 of 2

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Appeals - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Other Reviews - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AllReviewsTotal

Discretionary Review

Personal RestraintTotalCivilCriminal

PENDING AT YEAR END (1)

30 46 76 82 17 99Cases Stayed 175

612 534 1,146 270 119 389Brief Not Filed 1,535

216 125 341 30 4 34Appellant Brief Filed 375

447 413 860 125 32 157Respondent Brief Filed 1,017

3 2 5 1 1 2Remanded to Trial Court 7

43 39 82 0 23 23Set for Commissioners' Calendar 105

13 3 16 2 8 10Ruling Referred to Panel 26

121 117 238 3 5 8Set for Oral Argument (2) 246

1,485 1,279 2,764 513 209 722Total Awaiting Hearing 3,486

136 111 247 6 6 12Opinion/Order in Process 259

1,621 1,390 3,011 519 215 734Total Pending Decision 3,745

MANDATED

850 587 1,437 28 45 73Opinion Terminating Review 1,510

46 40 86 779 35 814Order Terminating Review 900

265 545 810 90 277 367Ruling Terminating Review 1,177

2 15 17 2 7 9Other Decision Terminating Review (3) 26

1,163 1,187 2,350 899 364 1,263Total Mandated 3,613

(1) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of resolution types and the various stages of pendingcaseload are not comparable to measurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(2) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays thesetting of cases until there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(3) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(4) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I forpreparation of opinions and mandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts inboth divisions. The opinions for those transferred cases are included in Division I figures, only.(5) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution countsreported. Page 8 of 44

Page 9: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, Division I (4) - 2012 Annual Report

Page 1 of 2

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Appeals - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Other Reviews - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AllReviewsTotal

Discretionary Review

Personal RestraintTotalCivilCriminal

FILINGS

383 601 984 314 197 511Total Filings 1,495

RESOLUTIONS (5)

39 76 115 3 6 9Opinions Published 124

336 236 572 9 16 25Opinions Unpublished 597

375 312 687 12 22 34Opinion Terminating Review 721

4 4 8 303 5 308Dismissed 316

0 4 4 0 1 1Transferred/Certified 5

0 2 2 0 25 25Review Not Accepted 27

1 9 10 6 5 11Other Terminations 21

5 19 24 309 36 345Order Terminating Review 369

1 10 11 0 1 1Decided on Merits 12

79 195 274 29 50 79Dismissed 353

2 5 7 0 52 52Review Not Accepted 59

13 5 18 3 1 4Other Terminations 22

95 215 310 32 104 136Ruling Terminating Review 446

475 546 1,021 353 162 515Total Resolved 1,536

PENDING AT YEAR END (1)

(1) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of resolution types and the various stages of pendingcaseload are not comparable to measurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(2) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays thesetting of cases until there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(3) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(4) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I forpreparation of opinions and mandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts inboth divisions. The opinions for those transferred cases are included in Division I figures, only.(5) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution countsreported. Page 9 of 44

Page 10: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, Division I (4) - 2012 Annual Report

Page 2 of 2

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Appeals - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Other Reviews - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AllReviewsTotal

Discretionary Review

Personal RestraintTotalCivilCriminal

6 28 34 60 9 69Cases Stayed 103

201 243 444 154 69 223Brief Not Filed 667

75 55 130 12 1 13Appellant Brief Filed 143

180 193 373 15 14 29Respondent Brief Filed 402

0 0 0 1 0 1Remanded to Trial Court 1

1 1 2 0 4 4Set for Commissioners' Calendar 6

0 1 1 1 8 9Ruling Referred to Panel 10

37 72 109 0 1 1Set for Oral Argument (2) 110

500 593 1,093 243 106 349Total Awaiting Hearing 1,442

21 49 70 1 1Opinion/Order in Process 71

521 642 1,163 243 107 350Total Pending Decision 1,513

MANDATED

319 321 640 10 21 31Opinion Terminating Review 671

4 13 17 302 30 332Order Terminating Review 349

94 227 321 28 96 124Ruling Terminating Review 445

1 14 15 1 5 6Other Decision Terminating Review (3) 21

418 575 993 341 152 493Total Mandated 1,486

(1) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of resolution types and the various stages of pendingcaseload are not comparable to measurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(2) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays thesetting of cases until there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(3) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(4) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I forpreparation of opinions and mandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts inboth divisions. The opinions for those transferred cases are included in Division I figures, only.(5) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution countsreported. Page 10 of 44

Page 11: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, Division II (4) - 2012 Annual Report

Page 1 of 2

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Appeals - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Other Reviews - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AllReviewsTotal

Discretionary Review

Personal RestraintTotalCivilCriminal

FILINGS

463 458 921 336 154 490Total Filings 1,411

RESOLUTIONS (5)

50 68 118 2 12 14Opinions Published 132

287 91 378 7 4 11Opinions Unpublished 389

337 159 496 9 16 25Opinion Terminating Review 521

4 1 5 296 0 296Dismissed 301

22 12 34 2 1 3Transferred/Certified 37

2 7 9 34 0 34Other Terminations 43

28 20 48 332 1 333Order Terminating Review 381

15 43 58 0 3 3Decided on Merits 61

49 129 178 49 34 83Dismissed 261

2 0 2 3 1 4Transferred/Certified 6

3 6 9 1 55 56Review Not Accepted 65

2 5 7 1 0 1Other Terminations 8

71 183 254 54 93 147Ruling Terminating Review 401

436 362 798 395 110 505Total Resolved 1,303

PENDING AT YEAR END (1)

(1) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of resolution types and the various stages of pendingcaseload are not comparable to measurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(2) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays thesetting of cases until there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(3) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(4) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I forpreparation of opinions and mandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts inboth divisions. The opinions for those transferred cases are included in Division I figures, only.(5) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution countsreported. Page 11 of 44

Page 12: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, Division II (4) - 2012 Annual Report

Page 2 of 2

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Appeals - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Other Reviews - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AllReviewsTotal

Discretionary Review

Personal RestraintTotalCivilCriminal

4 9 13 6 1 7Cases Stayed 20

276 190 466 69 45 114Brief Not Filed 580

75 43 118 14 2 16Appellant Brief Filed 134

178 155 333 79 13 92Respondent Brief Filed 425

7 7 14 0 8 8Set for Commissioners' Calendar 22

13 2 15 1 0 1Ruling Referred to Panel 16

56 32 88 2 3 5Set for Oral Argument (2) 93

609 438 1,047 171 72 243Total Awaiting Hearing 1,290

66 38 104 4 5 9Opinion/Order in Process 113

675 476 1,151 175 77 252Total Pending Decision 1,403

MANDATED

350 148 498 10 16 26Opinion Terminating Review 524

41 24 65 268 1 269Order Terminating Review 334

65 178 243 53 99 152Ruling Terminating Review 395

0 0 0 1 1Other Decision Terminating Review (3) 1

456 350 806 331 117 448Total Mandated 1,254

(1) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of resolution types and the various stages of pendingcaseload are not comparable to measurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(2) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays thesetting of cases until there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(3) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(4) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I forpreparation of opinions and mandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts inboth divisions. The opinions for those transferred cases are included in Division I figures, only.(5) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution countsreported. Page 12 of 44

Page 13: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, Division III - 2012 Annual Report

Page 1 of 2

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Appeals - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Other Reviews - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AllReviewsTotal

Discretionary Review

Personal RestraintTotalCivilCriminal

FILINGS

306 269 575 180 78 258Total Filings 833

RESOLUTIONS (4)

39 51 90 1 2 3Opinions Published 93

140 63 203 3 4 7Opinions Unpublished 210

179 114 293 4 6 10Opinion Terminating Review 303

0 0 0 179 0 179Dismissed 179

0 3 3 1 3 4Transferred/Certified 7

0 0 0 3 0 3Review Not Accepted 3

0 2 2 7 0 7Other Terminations 9

5 5 190 3 193Order Terminating Review 198

50 25 75 0 1 1Decided on Merits 76

38 81 119 9 16 25Dismissed 144

2 8 10 0 47 47Review Not Accepted 57

11 9 20 2 2 4Other Terminations 24

101 123 224 11 66 77Ruling Terminating Review 301

280 242 522 205 75 280Total Resolved 802

PENDING AT YEAR END (1)

(1) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of resolution types and the various stages of pendingcaseload are not comparable to measurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(2) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays thesetting of cases until there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(3) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(4) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution countsreported.

Page 13 of 44

Page 14: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, Division III - 2012 Annual Report

Page 2 of 2

- - - - - - - - - - - - - Appeals - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Other Reviews - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AllReviewsTotal

Discretionary Review

Personal RestraintTotalCivilCriminal

20 9 29 16 7 23Cases Stayed 52

135 101 236 47 5 52Brief Not Filed 288

66 27 93 4 1 5Appellant Brief Filed 98

89 65 154 31 5 36Respondent Brief Filed 190

3 2 5 0 1 1Remanded to Trial Court 6

35 31 66 0 11 11Set for Commissioners' Calendar 77

28 13 41 1 1 2Set for Oral Argument (2) 43

376 248 624 99 31 130Total Awaiting Hearing 754

49 24 73 2 2Opinion/Order in Process 75

425 272 697 101 31 132Total Pending Decision 829

MANDATED

181 118 299 8 8 16Opinion Terminating Review 315

1 3 4 209 4 213Order Terminating Review 217

106 140 246 9 82 91Ruling Terminating Review 337

1 1 2 1 1 2Other Decision Terminating Review (3) 4

289 262 551 227 95 322Total Mandated 873

(1) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of resolution types and the various stages of pendingcaseload are not comparable to measurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(2) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays thesetting of cases until there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(3) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(4) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution countsreported.

Page 14 of 44

Page 15: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Filings (1) - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % ChgDIVISION I

522 563 7.9 % 492 -12.6 % 480Criminal Appeals -20.2 % 383-2.4 %

622 701 12.7 % 683 -2.6 % 629Civil Appeals -4.5 % 601-7.9 %

1,144 1,264 10.5 % 1,175 -7 % 1,109Total Appeals -11.3 % 984-5.6 %

480 443 -7.7 % 433 -2.3 % 355Personal Restraint Petition -11.5 % 314-18 %

180 187 3.9 % 192 2.7 % 182Notice of Discretionary Review 8.2 % 197-5.2 %

1,804 1,894 5 % 1,800 -5 % 1,646Total Filings, DIVISION I -9.2 % 1,495-8.6 %

DIVISION II

618 540 -12.6 % 528 -2.2 % 476Criminal Appeals -2.7 % 463-9.8 %

416 443 6.5 % 450 1.6 % 411Civil Appeals 11.4 % 458-8.7 %

1,034 983 -4.9 % 978 -0.5 % 887Total Appeals 3.8 % 921-9.3 %

351 348 -0.9 % 341 -2 % 313Personal Restraint Petition 7.3 % 336-8.2 %

105 136 29.5 % 122 -10.3 % 100Notice of Discretionary Review 54 % 154-18 %

1,490 1,467 -1.5 % 1,441 -1.8 % 1,300Total Filings, DIVISION II 8.5 % 1,411-9.8 %

DIVISION III

304 330 8.6 % 300 -9.1 % 319Criminal Appeals -4.1 % 3066.3 %

296 319 7.8 % 291 -8.8 % 297Civil Appeals -9.4 % 2692.1 %

600 649 8.2 % 591 -8.9 % 616Total Appeals -6.7 % 5754.2 %

253 267 5.5 % 204 -23.6 % 221Personal Restraint Petition -18.6 % 1808.3 %

117 89 -23.9 % 90 1.1 % 84Notice of Discretionary Review -7.1 % 78-6.7 %

(1) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I for preparation of opinions andmandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts in both divisions. The opinions for those transferredcases are included in Division I figures, only.

Page 15 of 44

Page 16: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Filings (1) - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % Chg 970 1,005 3.6 % 885 -11.9 % 921Total Filings, DIVISION III -9.6 % 8334.1 %

COURT OF APPEALS, TOTAL

1,444 1,433 -0.8 % 1,320 -7.9 % 1,275Criminal Appeals -9.6 % 1,152-3.4 %

1,334 1,463 9.7 % 1,424 -2.7 % 1,337Civil Appeals -0.7 % 1,328-6.1 %

2,778 2,896 4.2 % 2,744 -5.2 % 2,612Total Appeals -5.1 % 2,480-4.8 %

1,084 1,058 -2.4 % 978 -7.6 % 889Personal Restraint Petition -6.6 % 830-9.1 %

402 412 2.5 % 404 -1.9 % 366Notice of Discretionary Review 17.2 % 429-9.4 %

4,264 4,366 2.4 % 4,126 -5.5 % 3,867Total Filings, Court of Appeals -3.3 % 3,739-6.3 %

(1) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I for preparation of opinions andmandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts in both divisions. The opinions for those transferredcases are included in Division I figures, only.

Page 16 of 44

Page 17: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Resolutions (1)(2) - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % ChgDIVISION I

560 513 -8.4 % 433 -15.6 % 446Criminal Appeals 6.5 % 4753 %

587 559 -4.8 % 530 -5.2 % 570Civil Appeals -4.2 % 5467.5 %

1,147 1,072 -6.5 % 963 -10.2 % 1,016Total Appeals 0.5 % 1,0215.5 %

417 434 4.1 % 391 -9.9 % 308Personal Restraint Petition 14.6 % 353-21.2 %

174 157 -9.8 % 182 15.9 % 151Notice of Discretionary Review 7.3 % 162-17 %

1,738 1,663 -4.3 % 1,536 -7.6 % 1,475Total Resolutions, DIVISION I 4.1 % 1,536-4 %

DIVISION II

485 547 12.8 % 494 -9.7 % 449Criminal Appeals -2.9 % 436-9.1 %

377 401 6.4 % 392 -2.2 % 372Civil Appeals -2.7 % 362-5.1 %

862 948 10 % 886 -6.5 % 821Total Appeals -2.8 % 798-7.3 %

367 362 -1.4 % 277 -23.5 % 249Personal Restraint Petition 58.6 % 395-10.1 %

91 118 29.7 % 96 -18.6 % 118Notice of Discretionary Review -6.8 % 11022.9 %

1,320 1,428 8.2 % 1,259 -11.8 % 1,188Total Resolutions, DIVISION II 9.7 % 1,303-5.6 %

DIVISION III

317 317 0 % 254 -19.9 % 291Criminal Appeals -3.8 % 28014.6 %

260 266 2.3 % 241 -9.4 % 258Civil Appeals -6.2 % 2427.1 %

577 583 1 % 495 -15.1 % 549Total Appeals -4.9 % 52210.9 %

221 189 -14.5 % 193 2.1 % 156Personal Restraint Petition 31.4 % 205-19.2 %

163 95 -41.7 % 79 -16.8 % 78Notice of Discretionary Review -3.8 % 75-1.3 %

(1) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I for preparation of opinions andmandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts in both divisions. The opinions for those transferredcases are included in Division I figures, only.(2) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 17 of 44

Page 18: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Resolutions (1)(2) - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % Chg 961 867 -9.8 % 767 -11.5 % 783Total Resolutions, DIVISION III 2.4 % 8022.1 %

COURT OF APPEALS, TOTAL

1,362 1,377 1.1 % 1,181 -14.2 % 1,186Criminal Appeals 0.4 % 1,1910.4 %

1,224 1,226 0.2 % 1,163 -5.1 % 1,200Civil Appeals -4.2 % 1,1503.2 %

2,586 2,603 0.7 % 2,344 -10 % 2,386Total Appeals -1.9 % 2,3411.8 %

1,005 985 -2 % 861 -12.6 % 713Personal Restraint Petition 33.7 % 953-17.2 %

428 370 -13.6 % 357 -3.5 % 347Notice of Discretionary Review 0 % 347-2.8 %

4,019 3,958 -1.5 % 3,562 -10 % 3,446Total Resolutions, Court of Appeals 5.7 % 3,641-3.3 %

(1) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I for preparation of opinions andmandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts in both divisions. The opinions for those transferredcases are included in Division I figures, only.(2) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 18 of 44

Page 19: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Pending Cases - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % ChgDIVISION I

549 585 6.6 % 577 -1.4 % 603Criminal Appeals -13.6 % 5214.5 %

486 596 22.6 % 646 8.4 % 633Civil Appeals 1.4 % 642-2 %

1,035 1,181 14.1 % 1,223 3.6 % 1,236Total Appeals -5.9 % 1,1631.1 %

203 198 -2.5 % 235 18.7 % 271Personal Restraint Petition -10.3 % 24315.3 %

69 87 26.1 % 73 -16.1 % 91Notice of Discretionary Review 17.6 % 10724.7 %

1,307 1,466 12.2 % 1,531 4.4 % 1,598Total Pending, DIVISION I -5.3 % 1,5134.4 %

DIVISION II

739 704 -4.7 % 693 -1.6 % 677Criminal Appeals -0.3 % 675-2.3 %

400 400 0 % 398 -0.5 % 401Civil Appeals 18.7 % 4760.8 %

1,139 1,104 -3.1 % 1,091 -1.2 % 1,078Total Appeals 6.8 % 1,151-1.2 %

189 156 -17.5 % 198 26.9 % 214Personal Restraint Petition -18.2 % 1758.1 %

41 49 19.5 % 62 26.5 % 45Notice of Discretionary Review 71.1 % 77-27.4 %

1,369 1,309 -4.4 % 1,351 3.2 % 1,337Total Pending, DIVISION II 4.9 % 1,403-1 %

DIVISION III

339 343 1.2 % 375 9.3 % 404Criminal Appeals 5.2 % 4257.7 %

273 271 -0.7 % 265 -2.2 % 264Civil Appeals 3 % 272-0.4 %

612 614 0.3 % 640 4.2 % 668Total Appeals 4.3 % 6974.4 %

120 146 21.7 % 123 -15.8 % 150Personal Restraint Petition -32.7 % 10122 %

61 43 -29.5 % 38 -11.6 % 36Notice of Discretionary Review -13.9 % 31-5.3 %

Page 19 of 44

Page 20: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Pending Cases - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % Chg 793 803 1.3 % 801 -0.2 % 854Total Pending, DIVISION III -2.9 % 8296.6 %

COURT OF APPEALS, TOTAL

1,627 1,632 0.3 % 1,645 0.8 % 1,684Criminal Appeals -3.7 % 1,6212.4 %

1,159 1,267 9.3 % 1,309 3.3 % 1,298Civil Appeals 7.1 % 1,390-0.8 %

2,786 2,899 4.1 % 2,954 1.9 % 2,982Total Appeals 1 % 3,0110.9 %

512 500 -2.3 % 556 11.2 % 635Personal Restraint Petition -18.3 % 51914.2 %

171 179 4.7 % 173 -3.4 % 172Notice of Discretionary Review 25 % 215-0.6 %

3,469 3,578 3.1 % 3,683 2.9 % 3,789Total Pending, Court of Appeals -1.2 % 3,7452.9 %

Page 20 of 44

Page 21: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Activity, All Reviews, All Divisions (10) - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)FILINGS

4,264 4,366 2.4 % 4,126 -5.5 % 3,867Total Filings -3.3 % 3,739-6.3 %

RESOLUTIONS (1) (11)

387 388 0.3 % 308 -20.6 % 399Opinions Published -12.5 % 34929.5 %

1,207 1,307 8.3 % 1,161 -11.2 % 1,129Opinions Unpublished 5.9 % 1,196-2.8 %

1,594 1,695 6.3 % 1,469 -13.3 % 1,528Opinions 1.1 % 1,5454 %

825 786 -4.7 % 736 -6.4 % 613Dismissed 29.9 % 796-16.7 %

28 65 . % 55 -15.4 % 94Transferred/Certified (2) -47.9 % 4970.9 %

27 23 . % 15 . % 29Review Not Accepted . % 30. %

71 52 -26.8 % 59 13.5 % 46Other Terminations 58.7 % 73-22 %

951 926 -2.6 % 865 -6.6 % 782Orders 21.2 % 948-9.6 %

355 235 -33.8 % 215 -8.5 % 172Decided on Merits -13.4 % 149-20 %

830 820 -1.2 % 731 -10.9 % 716Dismissed 5.9 % 758-2.1 %

1 0 . % 1 . % 2Transferred/Certified (2) . % 6. %

247 238 -3.6 % 234 -1.7 % 201Review Not Accepted -10 % 181-14.1 %

41 44 7.3 % 47 6.8 % 45Other Terminations 20 % 54-4.3 %

1,474 1,337 -9.3 % 1,228 -8.2 % 1,136Rulings 1.1 % 1,148-7.5 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 0Other Decisions Term. Review (3) . % 0. %

2,425 2,263 -6.7 % 2,093 -7.5 % 1,918Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) 9.3 % 2,096-8.4 %

4,019 3,958 -1.5 % 3,562 -10 % 3,446Total Resolved 5.7 % 3,641-3.3 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I for preparation of opinions andmandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts in both divisions. The opinions for those transferredcases are included in Division I figures, only.(11) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 21 of 44

Page 22: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Activity, All Reviews, All Divisions (10) - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)PENDING AT YEAR END (5)

196 176 -10.2 % 214 21.6 % 250Cases Stayed -30 % 17516.8 %

1,592 1,594 0.1 % 1,554 -2.5 % 1,616Brief Not Filed -5 % 1,5354 %

398 411 3.3 % 379 -7.8 % 377Appellant Brief Filed -0.5 % 375-0.5 %

574 793 38.2 % 901 13.6 % 944Respondent Brief Filed 7.7 % 1,0174.8 %

17 11 . % 5 . % 5Remanded to Trial Court . % 7. %

161 126 -21.7 % 129 2.4 % 86Set for Commissioners' Calendar 22.1 % 105-33.3 %

26 10 . % 21 . % 21Ruling Referred to Panel (6) . % 26. %

260 247 -5 % 207 -16.2 % 200Set for Oral Argument (7) 23 % 246-3.4 %

3,224 3,368 4.5 % 3,410 1.2 % 3,499Total Awaiting Hearing -0.4 % 3,4862.6 %

245 210 -14.3 % 273 30 % 290Opinion/Order in Process -10.7 % 2596.2 %

3,469 3,578 3.1 % 3,683 2.9 % 3,789Total Pending Decision -1.2 % 3,7452.9 %

MANDATED (1)

2,031 1,881 -7.4 % 1,735 -7.8 % 1,683Opinion Terminating Review -10.3 % 1,510-3 %

989 987 -0.2 % 882 -10.6 % 821Order Terminating Review 9.6 % 900-6.9 %

1,744 1,496 -14.2 % 1,410 -5.7 % 1,300Ruling Terminating Review -9.5 % 1,177-7.8 %

36 32 -11.1 % 35 9.4 % 23Other Decision Terminating Review . % 26. %

2,769 2,515 -9.2 % 2,327 -7.5 % 2,144Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) -1.9 % 2,103-7.9 %

4,800 4,396 -8.4 % 4,062 -7.6 % 3,827Total Mandated -5.6 % 3,613-5.8 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I for preparation of opinions andmandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts in both divisions. The opinions for those transferredcases are included in Division I figures, only.(11) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 22 of 44

Page 23: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Activity, All Reviews, Division I (10) - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)FILINGS

1,804 1,894 5 % 1,800 -5 % 1,646Total Filings -9.2 % 1,495-8.6 %

RESOLUTIONS (1) (11)

135 152 12.6 % 109 -28.3 % 161Opinions Published -23 % 12447.7 %

619 574 -7.3 % 565 -1.6 % 547Opinions Unpublished 9.1 % 597-3.2 %

754 726 -3.7 % 674 -7.2 % 708Opinions 1.8 % 7215 %

348 317 -8.9 % 323 1.9 % 274Dismissed 15.3 % 316-15.2 %

3 3 . % 7 . % 8Transferred/Certified (2) . % 5. %

1 1 . % 8 . % 25Review Not Accepted . % 27. %

18 20 . % 15 . % 10Other Terminations . % 21. %

370 341 -7.8 % 353 3.5 % 317Orders 16.4 % 369-10.2 %

111 52 -53.2 % 38 -26.9 % 24Decided on Merits . % 12. %

376 431 14.6 % 344 -20.2 % 345Dismissed 2.3 % 3530.3 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 1Transferred/Certified (2) . % 0. %

119 100 -16 % 120 20 % 67Review Not Accepted -11.9 % 59-44.2 %

8 13 . % 7 . % 13Other Terminations . % 22. %

614 596 -2.9 % 509 -14.6 % 450Rulings -0.9 % 446-11.6 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 0Other Decisions Term. Review (3) . % 0. %

984 937 -4.8 % 862 -8 % 767Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) 6.3 % 815-11 %

1,738 1,663 -4.3 % 1,536 -7.6 % 1,475Total Resolved 4.1 % 1,536-4 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I for preparation of opinions andmandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts in both divisions. The opinions for those transferredcases are included in Division I figures, only.(11) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 23 of 44

Page 24: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Activity, All Reviews, Division I (10) - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)PENDING AT YEAR END (5)

95 70 -26.3 % 100 42.9 % 103Cases Stayed 0 % 1033 %

690 727 5.4 % 680 -6.5 % 728Brief Not Filed -8.4 % 6677.1 %

174 165 -5.2 % 163 -1.2 % 136Appellant Brief Filed 5.1 % 143-16.6 %

187 335 79.1 % 392 17 % 481Respondent Brief Filed -16.4 % 40222.7 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 2Remanded to Trial Court . % 1. %

20 17 . % 8 . % 8Set for Commissioners' Calendar . % 6. %

1 0 . % 3 . % 3Ruling Referred to Panel (6) . % 10. %

103 105 1.9 % 110 4.8 % 73Set for Oral Argument (7) 50.7 % 110-33.6 %

1,270 1,419 11.7 % 1,456 2.6 % 1,534Total Awaiting Hearing -6 % 1,4425.4 %

37 47 27 % 75 59.6 % 64Opinion/Order in Process 10.9 % 71-14.7 %

1,307 1,466 12.2 % 1,531 4.4 % 1,598Total Pending Decision -5.3 % 1,5134.4 %

MANDATED (1)

941 855 -9.1 % 785 -8.2 % 753Opinion Terminating Review -10.9 % 671-4.1 %

377 369 -2.1 % 327 -11.4 % 323Order Terminating Review 8 % 349-1.2 %

719 644 -10.4 % 579 -10.1 % 523Ruling Terminating Review -14.9 % 445-9.7 %

25 19 . % 21 . % 16Other Decision Terminating Review . % 21. %

1,121 1,032 -7.9 % 927 -10.2 % 862Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) -5.5 % 815-7 %

2,062 1,887 -8.5 % 1,712 -9.3 % 1,615Total Mandated -8 % 1,486-5.7 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I for preparation of opinions andmandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts in both divisions. The opinions for those transferredcases are included in Division I figures, only.(11) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 24 of 44

Page 25: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Activity, All Reviews, Division II (10) - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)FILINGS

1,490 1,467 -1.5 % 1,441 -1.8 % 1,300Total Filings 8.5 % 1,411-9.8 %

RESOLUTIONS (1) (11)

135 146 8.1 % 130 -11 % 141Opinions Published -6.4 % 1328.5 %

366 493 34.7 % 424 -14 % 355Opinions Unpublished 9.6 % 389-16.3 %

501 639 27.5 % 554 -13.3 % 496Opinions 5 % 521-10.5 %

292 306 4.8 % 242 -20.9 % 203Dismissed 48.3 % 301-16.1 %

14 55 . % 34 -38.2 % 78Transferred/Certified (2) -52.6 % 37129.4 %

22 16 . % 1 . % 2Review Not Accepted . % 0. %

43 29 . % 36 . % 28Other Terminations . % 43. %

371 406 9.4 % 313 -22.9 % 311Orders 22.5 % 381-0.6 %

137 75 -45.3 % 81 8 % 69Decided on Merits -11.6 % 61-14.8 %

226 230 1.8 % 237 3 % 220Dismissed 18.6 % 261-7.2 %

1 0 . % 0 . % 0Transferred/Certified (2) . % 6. %

69 76 10.1 % 61 -19.7 % 84Review Not Accepted -22.6 % 6537.7 %

15 2 . % 13 . % 8Other Terminations . % 8. %

448 383 -14.5 % 392 2.3 % 381Rulings 5.2 % 401-2.8 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 0Other Decisions Term. Review (3) . % 0. %

819 789 -3.7 % 705 -10.6 % 692Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) 13 % 782-1.8 %

1,320 1,428 8.2 % 1,259 -11.8 % 1,188Total Resolved 9.7 % 1,303-5.6 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I for preparation of opinions andmandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts in both divisions. The opinions for those transferredcases are included in Division I figures, only.(11) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 25 of 44

Page 26: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Activity, All Reviews, Division II (10) - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)PENDING AT YEAR END (5)

39 39 0 % 39 0 % 58Cases Stayed . % 2048.7 %

594 537 -9.6 % 593 10.4 % 550Brief Not Filed 5.5 % 580-7.3 %

140 145 3.6 % 130 -10.3 % 149Appellant Brief Filed -10.1 % 13414.6 %

288 320 11.1 % 369 15.3 % 311Respondent Brief Filed 36.7 % 425-15.7 %

4 2 . % 2 . % 0Remanded to Trial Court . % 0. %

12 20 . % 32 . % 8Set for Commissioners' Calendar . % 22. %

25 10 . % 18 . % 17Ruling Referred to Panel (6) . % 16. %

112 100 -10.7 % 53 -47 % 95Set for Oral Argument (7) -2.1 % 9379.2 %

1,214 1,173 -3.4 % 1,236 5.4 % 1,188Total Awaiting Hearing 8.6 % 1,290-3.9 %

155 136 -12.3 % 115 -15.4 % 149Opinion/Order in Process -24.2 % 11329.6 %

1,369 1,309 -4.4 % 1,351 3.2 % 1,337Total Pending Decision 4.9 % 1,403-1 %

MANDATED (1)

651 650 -0.2 % 641 -1.4 % 571Opinion Terminating Review -8.2 % 524-10.9 %

398 396 -0.5 % 328 -17.2 % 300Order Terminating Review 11.3 % 334-8.5 %

557 413 -25.9 % 431 4.4 % 417Ruling Terminating Review -5.3 % 395-3.2 %

7 9 . % 7 . % 5Other Decision Terminating Review . % 1. %

962 818 -15 % 766 -6.4 % 722Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) 1.1 % 730-5.7 %

1,613 1,468 -9 % 1,407 -4.2 % 1,293Total Mandated -3 % 1,254-8.1 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) To alleviate case congestion, Division II transferred 50 cases in 2009 and 45 cases in 2010 (which would otherwise have been heard in Division II) to Division I for preparation of opinions andmandates. A transferred resolution appears for each of these cases in Division II figures. Each transferred case is included in filing counts in both divisions. The opinions for those transferredcases are included in Division I figures, only.(11) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 26 of 44

Page 27: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Activity, All Reviews, Division III - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)FILINGS

970 1,005 3.6 % 885 -11.9 % 921Total Filings -9.6 % 8334.1 %

RESOLUTIONS (1) (10)

117 90 -23.1 % 69 -23.3 % 97Opinions Published -4.1 % 9340.6 %

222 240 8.1 % 172 -28.3 % 227Opinions Unpublished -7.5 % 21032 %

339 330 -2.7 % 241 -27 % 324Opinions -6.5 % 30334.4 %

185 163 -11.9 % 171 4.9 % 136Dismissed 31.6 % 179-20.5 %

11 7 . % 14 . % 8Transferred/Certified (2) . % 7. %

4 6 . % 6 . % 2Review Not Accepted . % 3. %

10 3 . % 8 . % 8Other Terminations . % 9. %

210 179 -14.8 % 199 11.2 % 154Orders 28.6 % 198-22.6 %

107 108 0.9 % 96 -11.1 % 79Decided on Merits -3.8 % 76-17.7 %

228 159 -30.3 % 150 -5.7 % 151Dismissed -4.6 % 1440.7 %

0 0 . % 1 . % 1Transferred/Certified (2) . % 0. %

59 62 5.1 % 53 -14.5 % 50Review Not Accepted 14 % 57-5.7 %

18 29 . % 27 . % 24Other Terminations . % 24. %

412 358 -13.1 % 327 -8.7 % 305Rulings -1.3 % 301-6.7 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 0Other Decisions Term. Review (3) . % 0. %

622 537 -13.7 % 526 -2 % 459Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) 8.7 % 499-12.7 %

961 867 -9.8 % 767 -11.5 % 783Total Resolved 2.4 % 8022.1 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 27 of 44

Page 28: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonHistory of Activity, All Reviews, Division III - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)PENDING AT YEAR END (5)

62 67 8.1 % 75 11.9 % 89Cases Stayed -41.6 % 5218.7 %

308 330 7.1 % 281 -14.8 % 338Brief Not Filed -14.8 % 28820.3 %

84 101 20.2 % 86 -14.9 % 92Appellant Brief Filed 6.5 % 987 %

99 138 39.4 % 140 1.4 % 152Respondent Brief Filed 25 % 1908.6 %

13 9 . % 3 . % 3Remanded to Trial Court . % 6. %

129 89 -31 % 89 0 % 70Set for Commissioners' Calendar 10 % 77-21.3 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 1Ruling Referred to Panel (6) . % 0. %

45 42 -6.7 % 44 4.8 % 32Set for Oral Argument (7) 34.4 % 43-27.3 %

740 776 4.9 % 718 -7.5 % 777Total Awaiting Hearing -3 % 7548.2 %

53 27 . % 83 . % 77Opinion/Order in Process -2.6 % 75-7.2 %

793 803 1.3 % 801 -0.2 % 854Total Pending Decision -2.9 % 8296.6 %

MANDATED (1)

439 376 -14.4 % 309 -17.8 % 359Opinion Terminating Review -12.3 % 31516.2 %

214 222 3.7 % 227 2.3 % 198Order Terminating Review 9.6 % 217-12.8 %

468 439 -6.2 % 400 -8.9 % 360Ruling Terminating Review -6.4 % 337-10 %

4 4 . % 7 . % 2Other Decision Terminating Review . % 4. %

686 665 -3.1 % 634 -4.7 % 560Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) -0.4 % 558-11.7 %

1,125 1,041 -7.5 % 943 -9.4 % 919Total Mandated -5 % 873-2.5 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 28 of 44

Page 29: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions, Criminal Appeals - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)FILINGS

1,444 1,433 -0.8 % 1,320 -7.9 % 1,275Total Filings -9.6 % 1,152-3.4 %

RESOLUTIONS (1) (10)

148 151 2 % 117 -22.5 % 151Opinions Published -15.2 % 12829.1 %

721 853 18.3 % 746 -12.5 % 709Opinions Unpublished 7.6 % 763-5 %

869 1,004 15.5 % 863 -14 % 860Opinions 3.6 % 891-0.3 %

13 9 . % 8 . % 6Dismissed . % 8. %

9 22 . % 15 . % 56Transferred/Certified (2) . % 22. %

2 1 . % 1 . % 0Review Not Accepted . % 0. %

4 5 . % 3 . % 3Other Terminations . % 3. %

28 37 . % 27 . % 65Orders -49.2 % 33. %

237 106 -55.3 % 86 -18.9 % 71Decided on Merits -7 % 66-17.4 %

196 199 1.5 % 174 -12.6 % 166Dismissed 0 % 166-4.6 %

0 0 . % 1 . % 0Transferred/Certified (2) . % 2. %

13 10 . % 6 . % 6Review Not Accepted . % 7. %

19 21 . % 24 . % 18Other Terminations . % 26. %

465 336 -27.7 % 291 -13.4 % 261Rulings 2.3 % 267-10.3 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 0Other Decisions Term. Review (3) . % 0. %

493 373 -24.3 % 318 -14.7 % 326Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) -8 % 3002.5 %

1,362 1,377 1.1 % 1,181 -14.2 % 1,186Total Resolved 0.4 % 1,1910.4 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 29 of 44

Page 30: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions, Criminal Appeals - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)PENDING AT YEAR END (5)

51 49 -3.9 % 33 -32.7 % 63Cases Stayed . % 3090.9 %

711 688 -3.2 % 627 -8.9 % 637Brief Not Filed -3.9 % 6121.6 %

253 245 -3.2 % 240 -2 % 248Appellant Brief Filed -12.9 % 2163.3 %

241 369 53.1 % 441 19.5 % 426Respondent Brief Filed 4.9 % 447-3.4 %

8 3 . % 2 . % 2Remanded to Trial Court . % 3. %

69 42 -39.1 % 52 23.8 % 24Set for Commissioners' Calendar . % 43. %

23 10 . % 16 . % 15Ruling Referred to Panel (6) . % 13. %

147 123 -16.3 % 97 -21.1 % 112Set for Oral Argument (7) 8 % 12115.5 %

1,503 1,529 1.7 % 1,508 -1.4 % 1,527Total Awaiting Hearing -2.8 % 1,4851.3 %

124 103 -16.9 % 137 33 % 157Opinion/Order in Process -13.4 % 13614.6 %

1,627 1,632 0.3 % 1,645 0.8 % 1,684Total Pending Decision -3.7 % 1,6212.4 %

MANDATED (1)

1,078 1,081 0.3 % 1,011 -6.5 % 929Opinion Terminating Review -8.5 % 850-8.1 %

23 31 . % 37 19.4 % 46Order Terminating Review 0 % 4624.3 %

531 387 -27.1 % 325 -16 % 267Ruling Terminating Review -0.7 % 265-17.8 %

6 2 . % 3 . % 5Other Decision Terminating Review (8) . % 2. %

560 420 -25 % 365 -13.1 % 318Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) -1.6 % 313-12.9 %

1,638 1,501 -8.4 % 1,376 -8.3 % 1,247Total Mandated -6.7 % 1,163-9.4 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 30 of 44

Page 31: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions, Civil Appeals - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)FILINGS

1,334 1,463 9.7 % 1,424 -2.7 % 1,337Total Filings -0.7 % 1,328-6.1 %

RESOLUTIONS (1) (10)

207 200 -3.4 % 160 -20 % 212Opinions Published -8 % 19532.5 %

443 407 -8.1 % 383 -5.9 % 397Opinions Unpublished -1.8 % 3903.7 %

650 607 -6.6 % 543 -10.5 % 609Opinions -3.9 % 58512.2 %

7 7 . % 6 . % 8Dismissed . % 5. %

7 30 . % 30 . % 23Transferred/Certified (2) . % 19. %

2 1 . % 1 . % 3Review Not Accepted . % 2. %

5 8 . % 7 . % 7Other Terminations . % 18. %

21 46 . % 44 -4.3 % 41Orders 7.3 % 44-6.8 %

117 120 2.6 % 122 1.7 % 97Decided on Merits -19.6 % 78-20.5 %

391 405 3.6 % 403 -0.5 % 407Dismissed -0.5 % 4051 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 1Transferred/Certified (2) . % 0. %

35 29 . % 35 . % 26Review Not Accepted . % 19. %

10 19 . % 16 . % 19Other Terminations . % 19. %

553 573 3.6 % 576 0.5 % 550Rulings -5.3 % 521-4.5 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 0Other Decisions Term. Review (3) . % 0. %

574 619 7.8 % 620 0.2 % 591Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) -4.4 % 565-4.7 %

1,224 1,226 0.2 % 1,163 -5.1 % 1,200Total Resolved -4.2 % 1,1503.2 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 31 of 44

Page 32: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions, Civil Appeals - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)PENDING AT YEAR END (5)

53 50 -5.7 % 52 4 % 48Cases Stayed -4.2 % 46-7.7 %

523 547 4.6 % 553 1.1 % 550Brief Not Filed -2.9 % 534-0.5 %

122 140 14.8 % 105 -25 % 109Appellant Brief Filed 14.7 % 1253.8 %

198 266 34.3 % 329 23.7 % 350Respondent Brief Filed 18 % 4136.4 %

4 3 . % 3 . % 2Remanded to Trial Court . % 2. %

54 59 9.3 % 51 -13.6 % 43Set for Commissioners' Calendar -9.3 % 39-15.7 %

0 0 . % 3 . % 2Ruling Referred to Panel (6) . % 3. %

102 109 6.9 % 101 -7.3 % 79Set for Oral Argument (7) 48.1 % 117-21.8 %

1,056 1,174 11.2 % 1,197 2 % 1,183Total Awaiting Hearing 8.1 % 1,279-1.2 %

103 93 -9.7 % 112 20.4 % 115Opinion/Order in Process -3.5 % 1112.7 %

1,159 1,267 9.3 % 1,309 3.3 % 1,298Total Pending Decision 7.1 % 1,390-0.8 %

MANDATED (1)

833 698 -16.2 % 634 -9.2 % 667Opinion Terminating Review -12 % 5875.2 %

20 38 . % 48 26.3 % 45Order Terminating Review -11.1 % 40-6.3 %

729 638 -12.5 % 681 6.7 % 688Ruling Terminating Review -20.8 % 5451 %

10 9 . % 11 . % 10Other Decision Terminating Review (8) . % 15. %

759 685 -9.7 % 740 8 % 743Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) -19.2 % 6000.4 %

1,592 1,383 -13.1 % 1,374 -0.7 % 1,410Total Mandated -15.8 % 1,1872.6 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 32 of 44

Page 33: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions, Total Appeals - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)FILINGS

2,778 2,896 4.2 % 2,744 -5.2 % 2,612Total Filings -5.1 % 2,480-4.8 %

RESOLUTIONS (1) (10)

355 351 -1.1 % 277 -21.1 % 363Opinions Published -11 % 32331 %

1,164 1,260 8.2 % 1,129 -10.4 % 1,106Opinions Unpublished 4.2 % 1,153-2 %

1,519 1,611 6.1 % 1,406 -12.7 % 1,469Opinions 0.5 % 1,4764.5 %

20 16 . % 14 . % 14Dismissed . % 13. %

16 52 . % 45 -13.5 % 79Transferred/Certified (2) -48.1 % 4175.6 %

4 2 . % 2 . % 3Review Not Accepted . % 2. %

9 13 . % 10 . % 10Other Terminations . % 21. %

49 83 69.4 % 71 -14.5 % 106Orders -27.4 % 7749.3 %

354 226 -36.2 % 208 -8 % 168Decided on Merits -14.3 % 144-19.2 %

587 604 2.9 % 577 -4.5 % 573Dismissed -0.3 % 571-0.7 %

0 0 . % 1 . % 1Transferred/Certified (2) . % 2. %

48 39 -18.8 % 41 5.1 % 32Review Not Accepted . % 26-22 %

29 40 . % 40 0 % 37Other Terminations 21.6 % 45-7.5 %

1,018 909 -10.7 % 867 -4.6 % 811Rulings -2.8 % 788-6.5 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 0Other Decisions Term. Review (3) . % 0. %

1,067 992 -7 % 938 -5.4 % 917Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) -5.7 % 865-2.2 %

2,586 2,603 0.7 % 2,344 -10 % 2,386Total Resolved -1.9 % 2,3411.8 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 33 of 44

Page 34: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions, Total Appeals - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)PENDING AT YEAR END (5)

104 99 -4.8 % 85 -14.1 % 111Cases Stayed -31.5 % 7630.6 %

1,234 1,235 0.1 % 1,180 -4.5 % 1,187Brief Not Filed -3.5 % 1,1460.6 %

375 385 2.7 % 345 -10.4 % 357Appellant Brief Filed -4.5 % 3413.5 %

439 635 44.6 % 770 21.3 % 776Respondent Brief Filed 10.8 % 8600.8 %

12 6 . % 5 . % 4Remanded to Trial Court . % 5. %

123 101 -17.9 % 103 2 % 67Set for Commissioners' Calendar 22.4 % 82-35 %

23 10 . % 19 . % 17Ruling Referred to Panel (6) . % 16. %

249 232 -6.8 % 198 -14.7 % 191Set for Oral Argument (7) 24.6 % 238-3.5 %

2,559 2,703 5.6 % 2,705 0.1 % 2,710Total Awaiting Hearing 2 % 2,7640.2 %

227 196 -13.7 % 249 27 % 272Opinion/Order in Process -9.2 % 2479.2 %

2,786 2,899 4.1 % 2,954 1.9 % 2,982Total Pending Decision 1 % 3,0110.9 %

MANDATED (1)

1,911 1,779 -6.9 % 1,645 -7.5 % 1,596Opinion Terminating Review -10 % 1,437-3 %

43 69 60.5 % 85 23.2 % 91Order Terminating Review -5.5 % 867.1 %

1,260 1,025 -18.7 % 1,006 -1.9 % 955Ruling Terminating Review -15.2 % 810-5.1 %

16 11 . % 14 . % 15Other Decision Terminating Review (8) . % 17. %

1,319 1,105 -16.2 % 1,105 0 % 1,061Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) -13.9 % 913-4 %

3,230 2,884 -10.7 % 2,750 -4.6 % 2,657Total Mandated -11.6 % 2,350-3.4 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 34 of 44

Page 35: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions, Personal Restraint Petitions - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)FILINGS

1,084 1,058 -2.4 % 978 -7.6 % 889Total Filings -6.6 % 830-9.1 %

RESOLUTIONS (1) (10)

5 12 . % 8 . % 5Opinions Published . % 6. %

20 34 . % 18 . % 10Opinions Unpublished . % 19. %

25 46 . % 26 . % 15Opinions . % 25. %

804 769 -4.4 % 722 -6.1 % 599Dismissed 29.9 % 778-17 %

7 12 . % 7 . % 10Transferred/Certified (2) . % 3. %

22 20 . % 7 . % 1Review Not Accepted . % 3. %

60 38 -36.7 % 44 15.8 % 32Other Terminations 46.9 % 47-27.3 %

893 839 -6 % 780 -7 % 642Orders 29.4 % 831-17.7 %

0 1 . % 1 . % 0Decided on Merits . % 0. %

69 97 40.6 % 50 -48.5 % 47Dismissed 85.1 % 87-6 %

1 0 . % 0 . % 1Transferred/Certified (2) . % 3. %

7 1 . % 2 . % 6Review Not Accepted . % 1. %

10 1 . % 2 . % 2Other Terminations . % 6. %

87 100 14.9 % 55 -45 % 56Rulings 73.2 % 971.8 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 0Other Decisions Term. Review (3) . % 0. %

980 939 -4.2 % 835 -11.1 % 698Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) 33 % 928-16.4 %

1,005 985 -2 % 861 -12.6 % 713Total Resolved 33.7 % 953-17.2 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 35 of 44

Page 36: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions, Personal Restraint Petitions - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)PENDING AT YEAR END (5)

83 67 -19.3 % 114 70.1 % 121Cases Stayed -32.2 % 826.1 %

266 260 -2.3 % 292 12.3 % 341Brief Not Filed -20.8 % 27016.8 %

18 17 . % 23 . % 17Appellant Brief Filed . % 30. %

125 136 8.8 % 109 -19.9 % 143Respondent Brief Filed -12.6 % 12531.2 %

2 1 . % 0 . % 1Remanded to Trial Court . % 1. %

2 4 . % 4 . % 0Set for Commissioners' Calendar . % 0. %

3 0 . % 2 . % 1Ruling Referred to Panel (6) . % 2. %

2 8 . % 3 . % 5Set for Oral Argument (7) . % 3. %

501 493 -1.6 % 547 11 % 629Total Awaiting Hearing -18.4 % 51315 %

11 7 . % 9 . % 6Opinion/Order in Process . % 6. %

512 500 -2.3 % 556 11.2 % 635Total Pending Decision -18.3 % 51914.2 %

MANDATED (1)

57 58 1.8 % 45 -22.4 % 34Opinion Terminating Review . % 28-24.4 %

935 913 -2.4 % 777 -14.9 % 700Order Terminating Review 11.3 % 779-9.9 %

96 110 14.6 % 69 -37.3 % 62Ruling Terminating Review 45.2 % 90-10.1 %

13 15 . % 13 . % 2Other Decision Terminating Review (8) . % 2. %

1,044 1,038 -0.6 % 859 -17.2 % 764Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) 14 % 871-11.1 %

1,101 1,096 -0.5 % 904 -17.5 % 798Total Mandated 12.7 % 899-11.7 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 36 of 44

Page 37: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions, Notices of Discretionary Review - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)FILINGS

402 412 2.5 % 404 -1.9 % 366Total Filings 17.2 % 429-9.4 %

RESOLUTIONS (1) (10)

27 25 . % 23 . % 31Opinions Published . % 20. %

23 13 . % 14 . % 13Opinions Unpublished . % 24. %

50 38 -24 % 37 -2.6 % 44Opinions 0 % 4418.9 %

1 1 . % 0 . % 0Dismissed . % 5. %

5 1 . % 3 . % 5Transferred/Certified (2) . % 5. %

1 1 . % 6 . % 25Review Not Accepted . % 25. %

2 1 . % 5 . % 4Other Terminations . % 5. %

9 4 . % 14 . % 34Orders 17.6 % 40. %

1 8 . % 6 . % 4Decided on Merits . % 5. %

174 119 -31.6 % 104 -12.6 % 96Dismissed 4.2 % 100-7.7 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 0Transferred/Certified (2) . % 1. %

192 198 3.1 % 191 -3.5 % 163Review Not Accepted -5.5 % 154-14.7 %

2 3 . % 5 . % 6Other Terminations . % 3. %

369 328 -11.1 % 306 -6.7 % 269Rulings -2.2 % 263-12.1 %

0 0 . % 0 . % 0Other Decisions Term. Review (3) . % 0. %

378 332 -12.2 % 320 -3.6 % 303Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) 0 % 303-5.3 %

428 370 -13.6 % 357 -3.5 % 347Total Resolved 0 % 347-2.8 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 37 of 44

Page 38: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonCourt Activity, All Divisions, Notices of Discretionary Review - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg (9) 2010 % Chg (9) 2011 % Chg (9) 2012 % Chg (9)PENDING AT YEAR END (5)

9 10 . % 15 . % 18Cases Stayed . % 17. %

92 99 7.6 % 82 -17.2 % 88Brief Not Filed 35.2 % 1197.3 %

5 9 . % 11 . % 3Appellant Brief Filed . % 4. %

10 22 . % 22 . % 25Respondent Brief Filed . % 32. %

3 4 . % 0 . % 0Remanded to Trial Court . % 1. %

36 21 . % 22 . % 19Set for Commissioners' Calendar . % 23. %

0 0 . % 0 . % 3Ruling Referred to Panel (6) . % 8. %

9 7 . % 6 . % 4Set for Oral Argument (7) . % 5. %

164 172 4.9 % 158 -8.1 % 160Total Awaiting Hearing 30.6 % 2091.3 %

7 7 . % 15 . % 12Opinion/Order in Process . % 6. %

171 179 4.7 % 173 -3.4 % 172Total Pending Decision 25 % 215-0.6 %

MANDATED (1)

63 44 -30.2 % 45 2.3 % 53Opinion Terminating Review -15.1 % 4517.8 %

11 5 . % 20 . % 30Order Terminating Review . % 35. %

388 361 -7 % 335 -7.2 % 283Ruling Terminating Review -2.1 % 277-15.5 %

7 6 . % 8 . % 6Other Decision Terminating Review (8) . % 7. %

406 372 -8.4 % 363 -2.4 % 319Total Orders/Rulings/Other (4) 0 % 319-12.1 %

469 416 -11.3 % 408 -1.9 % 372Total Mandated -2.2 % 364-8.8 %

(1) As a result of changes in resolution coding procedures in 2005, resolutions and mandated are now categorized by Opinions, Orders Terminating Review, and Rulings Terminating Review.Figures for these categories are reported for the first time in 2005.(2) Includes both matters transferred to other divisions and those certified to the Supreme Court.(3) Includes decisions entered prior to more-specific coding (orders/rulings) adopted during 2005.(4) For years prior to 2005, it is not possible to distinguish the different types of resolution. Figures are broadly aggregated and shown as the sum of these resolution types.(5) As a result of the recent transition to the new Appellate Court Records and Data System(ACORDS-II), measurement of the various stages of pending caseload are not comparable tomeasurements for prior years. Extreme caution should be used in interpreting 2003 and future activity relative to that shown for prior years.(6) Ruling Referred to Panel status was reintroduced to ACORDS in February 2004. As a result, the trend figures are not comparable.(7) Set for Oral Argument counts are influenced by procedural differences among divisions in setting cases. Division III, due to hearings in multiple locations, often delays the setting of casesuntil there are sufficient numbers to warrant travel, but cases are usually set only six weeks out.(8) Includes completions for secondary cases, which are those consolidated with a primary case and disposed by mandate/certificate of finality entered in the primary case.(9) Percentages are not reported when numbers are small (less than 30).(10) As of 2010, Resolution counts have been updated to report only primary case resolutions. Secondary case resolutions have been excluded from all of the resolution counts reported.

Page 38 of 44

Page 39: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonDays Between Events for Criminal Appeals Pending or Disposed of by Opinion --75th Percentile (1) - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % ChgDIVISION I

189 184 -2.6 % 170 -7.6 % 164Filing - Comp. of Record -1.2 % 162-3.5 %

77 73 -5.2 % 66 -9.6 % 67Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. 4.5 % 701.5 %

112 111 -0.9 % 106 -4.5 % 98Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record -5.1 % 93-7.5 %

88 87 -1.1 % 83 -4.6 % 83Comp. of Record - App. Brief 2.4 % 850 %

98 96 -2 % 93 -3.1 % 107App. Brief - Ready -5.6 % 10115.1 %

186 151 -18.8 % 204 35.1 % 244Ready - Opinion 19.3 % 29119.6 %

524 509 -2.9 % 537 5.5 % 592Filing Opinion, DIVISION I (2) 7.6 % 63710.2 %

DIVISION II

145 141 -2.8 % 140 -0.7 % 140Filing - Comp. of Record 2.1 % 1430 %

59 57 -3.4 % 56 -1.8 % 55Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. -1.8 % 54-1.8 %

85 83 -2.4 % 84 1.2 % 87Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record 4.6 % 913.6 %

97 96 -1 % 116 20.8 % 130Comp. of Record - App. Brief 2.3 % 13312.1 %

106 102 -3.8 % 101 -1 % 99App. Brief - Ready 2 % 101-2 %

242 277 14.5 % 293 5.8 % 361Ready - Opinion -0.3 % 36023.2 %

566 572 1.1 % 601 5.1 % 651Filing Opinion, DIVISION II (2) 4.9 % 6838.3 %

DIVISION III

145 145 0 % 155 6.9 % 151Filing - Comp. of Record 2 % 154-2.6 %

51 55 7.8 % 57 3.6 % 56Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. -7.1 % 52-1.8 %

93 92 -1.1 % 94 2.2 % 95Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record 7.4 % 1021.1 %

(1) Days to reach the 75th percentile for the full period (filing to opinion) do not necessarily equal the sum of the days for the event categories within that period.(2) Time-in-process figures for 2002 have been updated to reflect a full twelve months' data for all divisions with the completion of statewide conversion to the new Appellate Court Records andData System (ACORDS-II). Division II's measurements in the 2002 publication were based on the period 1/01/2002 through 11/17/2002 from the old ACORDS system, prior to their 11/18/2002implementation of ACORDS-II. This update achieved comparability with the other divisions, which implemented in early 2003.

Page 39 of 44

Page 40: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonDays Between Events for Criminal Appeals Pending or Disposed of by Opinion --75th Percentile (1) - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % Chg 86 98 14 % 103 5.1 % 99Comp. of Record - App. Brief -1 % 98-3.9 %

101 92 -8.9 % 95 3.3 % 102App. Brief - Ready 15.7 % 1187.4 %

219 189 -13.7 % 201 6.3 % 223Ready - Opinion 3.6 % 23110.9 %

532 502 -5.6 % 545 8.6 % 571Filing Opinion, DIVISION III (2) 2.6 % 5864.8 %

COURT OF APPEALS, TOTAL

160 157 -1.9 % 155 -1.3 % 153Filing - Comp. of Record 0 % 153-1.3 %

67 64 -4.5 % 62 -3.1 % 61Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. 1.6 % 62-1.6 %

96 95 -1 % 96 1.1 % 93Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record 0 % 93-3.1 %

92 92 0 % 101 9.8 % 102Comp. of Record - App. Brief 0 % 1021 %

103 97 -5.8 % 96 -1 % 103App. Brief - Ready 1 % 1047.3 %

223 224 0.4 % 255 13.8 % 294Ready - Opinion 9.2 % 32115.3 %

543 536 -1.3 % 569 6.2 % 616Filing Opinion, Court of Appeals (2) 4.2 % 6428.3 %

(1) Days to reach the 75th percentile for the full period (filing to opinion) do not necessarily equal the sum of the days for the event categories within that period.(2) Time-in-process figures for 2002 have been updated to reflect a full twelve months' data for all divisions with the completion of statewide conversion to the new Appellate Court Records andData System (ACORDS-II). Division II's measurements in the 2002 publication were based on the period 1/01/2002 through 11/17/2002 from the old ACORDS system, prior to their 11/18/2002implementation of ACORDS-II. This update achieved comparability with the other divisions, which implemented in early 2003.

Page 40 of 44

Page 41: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonDays Between Events for Civil Appeals Pending or Disposed of by Opinion --75th Percentile(1) - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % ChgDIVISION I

124 121 -2.4 % 124 2.5 % 115Filing - Comp. of Record -1.7 % 113-7.3 %

57 48 -15.8 % 47 -2.1 % 48Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. 0 % 482.1 %

79 84 6.3 % 77 -8.3 % 76Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record 0 % 76-1.3 %

91 85 -6.6 % 84 -1.2 % 88Comp. of Record - App. Brief 4.5 % 924.8 %

82 78 -4.9 % 74 -5.1 % 73App. Brief - Ready -2.7 % 71-1.4 %

223 201 -9.9 % 252 25.4 % 327Ready - Opinion 11.9 % 36629.8 %

504 454 -9.9 % 513 13 % 557Filing Opinion, DIVISION I (2) 5 % 5858.6 %

DIVISION II

110 104 -5.5 % 104 0 % 106Filing - Comp. of Record 3.8 % 1101.9 %

54 50 -7.4 % 47 -6 % 48Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. 8.3 % 522.1 %

72 64 -11.1 % 65 1.6 % 66Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record 1.5 % 671.5 %

90 88 -2.2 % 136 54.5 % 138Comp. of Record - App. Brief -8.7 % 1261.5 %

80 74 -7.5 % 78 5.4 % 75App. Brief - Ready -10.7 % 67-3.8 %

298 330 10.7 % 350 6.1 % 375Ready - Opinion 4.5 % 3927.1 %

550 567 3.1 % 580 2.3 % 609Filing Opinion, DIVISION II (2) 3.1 % 6285 %

DIVISION III

130 130 0 % 121 -6.9 % 118Filing - Comp. of Record 5.9 % 125-2.5 %

65 56 -13.8 % 56 0 % 51Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. 0 % 51-8.9 %

84 91 8.3 % 87 -4.4 % 86Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record 5.8 % 91-1.1 %

(1) Days to reach the 75th percentile for the full period (filing to opinion) do not necessarily equal the sum of the days for the event categories within that period.(2) Time-in-process figures for 2002 have been updated to reflect a full twelve months' data for all divisions with the completion of statewide conversion to the new Appellate Court Records andData System (ACORDS-II). Division II's measurements in the 2002 publication were based on the period 1/01/2002 through 11/17/2002 from the old ACORDS system, prior to their 11/18/2002implementation of ACORDS-II. This update achieved comparability with the otherdivisions, which implemented in early 2003.

Page 41 of 44

Page 42: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonDays Between Events for Civil Appeals Pending or Disposed of by Opinion --75th Percentile(1) - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % Chg 84 88 4.8 % 92 4.5 % 92Comp. of Record - App. Brief 5.4 % 970 %

77 83 7.8 % 91 9.6 % 86App. Brief - Ready 10.5 % 95-5.5 %

220 198 -10 % 219 10.6 % 257Ready - Opinion -3.1 % 24917.4 %

484 461 -4.8 % 493 6.9 % 548Filing Opinion, DIVISION III (2) -2.9 % 53211.2 %

COURT OF APPEALS, TOTAL

122 117 -4.1 % 116 -0.9 % 113Filing - Comp. of Record 1.8 % 115-2.6 %

56 50 -10.7 % 49 -2 % 49Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. 2 % 500 %

78 78 0 % 77 -1.3 % 76Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record 0 % 76-1.3 %

90 87 -3.3 % 97 11.5 % 100Comp. of Record - App. Brief 4 % 1043.1 %

80 78 -2.5 % 78 0 % 76App. Brief - Ready -1.3 % 75-2.6 %

246 266 8.1 % 291 9.4 % 329Ready - Opinion 9.4 % 36013.1 %

509 501 -1.6 % 535 6.8 % 573Filing Opinion, Court of Appeals (2) 3.3 % 5927.1 %

(1) Days to reach the 75th percentile for the full period (filing to opinion) do not necessarily equal the sum of the days for the event categories within that period.(2) Time-in-process figures for 2002 have been updated to reflect a full twelve months' data for all divisions with the completion of statewide conversion to the new Appellate Court Records andData System (ACORDS-II). Division II's measurements in the 2002 publication were based on the period 1/01/2002 through 11/17/2002 from the old ACORDS system, prior to their 11/18/2002implementation of ACORDS-II. This update achieved comparability with the otherdivisions, which implemented in early 2003.

Page 42 of 44

Page 43: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonDays Between Events for Total Appeals Pending or Disposed of by Opinion --75th Percentile (1) - 2008 to 2012

Page 1 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % ChgDIVISION I

163 158 -3.1 % 153 -3.2 % 148Filing - Comp. of Record -1.4 % 146-3.3 %

70 66 -5.7 % 62 -6.1 % 62Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. 1.6 % 630 %

103 99 -3.9 % 98 -1 % 91Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record -3.3 % 88-7.1 %

90 86 -4.4 % 84 -2.3 % 84Comp. of Record - App. Brief 6 % 890 %

94 91 -3.2 % 89 -2.2 % 94App. Brief - Ready -3.2 % 915.6 %

204 172 -15.7 % 229 33.1 % 284Ready - Opinion 20.4 % 34224 %

517 490 -5.2 % 529 8 % 574Filing Opinion, DIVISION I (2) 5.6 % 6068.5 %

DIVISION II

136 132 -2.9 % 133 0.8 % 133Filing - Comp. of Record 0.8 % 1340 %

58 56 -3.4 % 54 -3.6 % 53Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. 0 % 53-1.9 %

83 81 -2.4 % 81 0 % 84Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record 1.2 % 853.7 %

95 95 0 % 122 28.4 % 133Comp. of Record - App. Brief -2.3 % 1309 %

98 94 -4.1 % 96 2.1 % 92App. Brief - Ready 2.2 % 94-4.2 %

258 300 16.3 % 313 4.3 % 363Ready - Opinion 3.6 % 37616 %

561 571 1.8 % 597 4.6 % 642Filing Opinion, DIVISION II (2) 3.1 % 6627.5 %

DIVISION III

138 141 2.2 % 141 0 % 139Filing - Comp. of Record 4.3 % 145-1.4 %

54 55 1.9 % 57 3.6 % 55Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. -5.5 % 52-3.5 %

91 91 0 % 92 1.1 % 91Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record 9.9 % 100-1.1 %

(1) Days to reach the 75th percentile for the full period (filing to opinion) do not necessarily equal the sum of the days for the event categories within that period.(2) Time-in-process figures for 2002 have been updated to reflect a full twelve months' data for all divisions with the completion of statewide conversion to the new Appellate Court Records andData System (ACORDS-II). Division II's measurements in the 2002 publication were based on the period 1/01/2002 through 11/17/2002 from the old ACORDS system, prior to their 11/18/2002implementation of ACORDS-II. This update achieved comparability with the other divisions, which implemented in early 2003.

Page 43 of 44

Page 44: Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report · 2014. 7. 25. · Court of Appeals 2012 Annual Report Annual Caseload Report . Court of Appeals Glossary 3 Court Activity

Caseloads of the Courts of WashingtonDays Between Events for Total Appeals Pending or Disposed of by Opinion --75th Percentile (1) - 2008 to 2012

Page 2 of 2

2008 2009 % Chg 2010 % Chg 2011 % Chg 2012 % Chg 85 92 8.2 % 98 6.5 % 97Comp. of Record - App. Brief 1 % 98-1 %

91 90 -1.1 % 92 2.2 % 100App. Brief - Ready 10 % 1108.7 %

219 193 -11.9 % 212 9.8 % 237Ready - Opinion 0.4 % 23811.8 %

511 489 -4.3 % 530 8.4 % 561Filing Opinion, DIVISION III (2) 1.1 % 5675.8 %

COURT OF APPEALS, TOTAL

147 145 -1.4 % 143 -1.4 % 140Filing - Comp. of Record 0.7 % 141-2.1 %

63 61 -3.2 % 59 -3.3 % 59Filing - Stmt. Of Arrgmts. 0 % 590 %

91 91 0 % 91 0 % 89Stmt. Of Arrgmts. - Comp. of Record 0 % 89-2.2 %

91 91 0 % 100 9.9 % 102Comp. of Record - App. Brief 0 % 1022 %

94 92 -2.1 % 91 -1.1 % 95App. Brief - Ready 0 % 954.4 %

230 239 3.9 % 271 13.4 % 314Ready - Opinion 8.9 % 34215.9 %

535 523 -2.2 % 558 6.7 % 594Filing Opinion, Court of Appeals (2) 4.9 % 6236.5 %

(1) Days to reach the 75th percentile for the full period (filing to opinion) do not necessarily equal the sum of the days for the event categories within that period.(2) Time-in-process figures for 2002 have been updated to reflect a full twelve months' data for all divisions with the completion of statewide conversion to the new Appellate Court Records andData System (ACORDS-II). Division II's measurements in the 2002 publication were based on the period 1/01/2002 through 11/17/2002 from the old ACORDS system, prior to their 11/18/2002implementation of ACORDS-II. This update achieved comparability with the other divisions, which implemented in early 2003.

Page 44 of 44