County Profile Template Booklet
-
Upload
purdue-center-for-regional-development -
Category
Data & Analytics
-
view
410 -
download
1
description
Transcript of County Profile Template Booklet
Data SnapShot Series 1.0
October 2014
DATA SNAPSHOTLake County
Table of contents
Introduction
01Demography
02
Economy
03Labor Market
04
Purpose
About Lake County
01introduction
4
Purpose
This document provides information
and data about Lake County that can
be used to guide local decision-
making activities.
The Data SnapShot showcases a variety of
demographic, economic and labor market
information that local leaders, community
organizations and others can use to gain a
better perspective on current conditions
and opportunities in their county.
To strengthen the value and usability of the
information, we showcase the data using a
variety of visual tools such as charts, graphs
and tables. In addition, we offer key points
about the data as a way of assisting the
user with the interpretation of the
information presented.
Finally, short takeaway messages are
offered at the end of each section in order
to highlight some of the more salient
findings.
Introduction
section 01
5
About Lake County
Introduction
section 01
County Background
Established 1837
County
Seat
Crown Point
Area 627 sq. mi.
Neighboring
Counties
Jasper, IN
Newton, IN
Porter, IN
Cook, IL
Kankakee, IL
Will, IL
Population pyramids
Population change
Race
Ethnicity
Educational attainment
Takeaways
02demography
7
Population change
Components of Population Change, 2000-2012
Total Change 5,572
Natural Increase 26,367
International Migration 4,436
Domestic Migration -22,404
The total population is
projected to increase
by 2.9 percent
between 2012 and
2020.
Demography
Sources: STATSIndiana, U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census, 2010 Decennial Census, 2012 Estimates, Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change
section 02
The total population increased by 1.9 percent between
2000 and 2012. The major contributor to that expansion
was natural increase (births minus deaths over that span
of time) with a net growth of nearly 26,000 persons.
Data on domestic migration (the difference between the
number of people moving out of the county versus moving
in) shows that out-migration outpaced in-migration by
nearly 22,000 people. On the other hand, international
migration had a net increase of over 4,400, indicating that
the county experienced an influx of new people from
outside the U.S.
484,564
496,005 493,618
507,724
2020201220102000
Total population
projections
8
9 6 3 0 3 6 9
0-9
10-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Percent of the PopulationA
ge
Co
ho
rt
Population pyramidsPopulation pyramids are visual representations of the age distribution of the population by gender.
While the male to female ratio of the population did not
change dramatically between 2000 and 2012, the
distribution of people across the various age categories
did change over the two periods of time.
Demography
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2012 Annual Population Estimates
section 02
The percent of people under 50 years old has decreased
for both males and females over the 2000-2012 period.
Also, the number of 50 and over now stands at nearly
169,000 people (about 34 percent of the population, up
from 28 percent in 2000).
Male Female
2012
9 6 3 0 3 6 9
00-09
10-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Percent of the Population
Age
Co
ho
rt
2000
Male Female
9
Race
The number of non-white
residents in Lake County
increased by five percentage
points between 2000 and
2012.
While every race other than white
experienced a numerical increase,
the population of Asian, Other and
Mixed Descent races gained the
most people, expanding from 33
percent to 38 percent of the total
population between 2000 and
2012.
Demography
Race Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2012 ACS
section 02
White
67%Other
33%
2000
Black
Asian
Native
Other
Mixed
White
62%
Other
38%
2012
Black
Asian
Native
Other
Mixed
10
Ethnicity
Hispanics are individuals of
any race whose ancestry is
from Mexico, Puerto Rico,
Cuba, Spain, the Dominican
Republic or any other Spanish-
speaking Central or South
American country.
There were 59,128 residing in
Lake County in 2000. This figure
expanded to 82,652 by 2012—a
39.7 percent increase.
As a result, Hispanics now make
up 17 percent of the overall
population (versus 12 percent in
2000).
Demography
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2012 ACS
section 02
17%
12%
Hispanics - 2000
Hispanics - 2012
11
Educational attainment
Educational attainment for adults
over 18 in Lake County is
increasing.
The proportion of adults (18 years of
age and older) with a high school
education or more improved from 80
percent in 2000 to 86 percent by 2012.
The percent with less than a high school
education fell by six percent over the
2000-2012 period (from 20 percent to
14 percent). On the other hand, those
with some college education grew from
28 percent to 32 percent.
The number of adults with a bachelor’s
degree or more stood at 18 percent in
2012, a slight increase compared to
2000.
Demography
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2012 ACS
section 02
No High
School
14%
High
School
36%Some
College
32%
College
18%
2012
No High
School
20%
High
School
37%
Some
College
28%
College
15%
2000
12
Takeaways
The population of Lake County is expected
to grow modestly over the next few years,
and if past trends hold, that increase will
be largely due to natural increase (more
births than deaths).
While Lake County’s population has been
growing over the 2000-2012 period, it has
also been aging. In addition, its domestic
migration has declined by nearly 22,000,
suggesting that young individuals and
those of prime working age (20-39 years
of age) are moving out of the county at a
faster pace than they are moving in.
The educational level of the population has
increased and the county has become more
diverse by race and ethnicity since 2000.
In order to achieve a balanced ratio of
working-age individuals and
dependents (minors and elderly), Lake
County should explore what mix of
services and amenities will retain and
attract educated young adults.
Demography
section 02
Establishments
Industries
Occupations
Income and poverty
Takeaways
03economy
14
Establishments
Components of Change for Establishments
Total Change (2000-11) 16,143
Natural Change (births minus
deaths)15,755
Net Migration 388
The number of establishments in Lake
County doubled between 2000 and 2011.
The rapid growth of establishments was largely
due to natural change. That is, 35,600
establishments were launched in the county
between 2000-2011 while 19,800 closed,
resulting in a gain of 15,755 establishments.
Economy
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2011 Database
section 03
An establishment is a
physical business location.
Branches, standalones and
headquarters are all
considered types of
establishments.
Definition of Company Stages
0 12 3
4
Self-
employed
2-9
employees
10-99
employees
100-499
employees
500+
employees
15
Number of establishments by stage/employment category
Economy
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2011 Database
section 03
2000 2011
Stage Establishments Proportion Establishments Proportion
Stage 0 3,256 20% 10,058 30%
Stage 1 9,314 57% 18,911 58%
Stage 2 3,501 21% 3,260 10%
Stage 3 257 1% 256 1%
Stage 4 46 1% 32 1%
Total 16,374 100% 32,517 100%
16
Number of jobs by stage/employment category
Economy
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2011 Database
section 03
2000 2011
Stage Jobs Proportion Jobs Proportion
Stage 0 3,256 1% 10,058 4%
Stage 1 35,916 16% 56,994 25%
Stage 2 87,716 39% 82,048 36%
Stage 3 43,486 19% 42,370 19%
Stage 4 56,055 25% 36,882 16%
Total 226,429 100% 228,352 100%
17
Amount of sales by stage/employment category
Economy
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2011 Database
section 03
2000 2011
Stage Sales Proportion Sales Proportion
Stage 0 $319,631,826 1% $673,636,676 3%
Stage 1 $4,008,852,759 15% $4,719,109,243 21%
Stage 2 $9,024,364,231 34% $7,949,058,309 35%
Stage 3 $5,158,581,200 20% $5,877,793,166 26%
Stage 4 $7,734,249,838 29% $3,526,973,814 16%
Total $26,245,679,854 100% $22,746,571,208 100%
18
Top five industries in 2012
55.6 percent of jobs are
tied to one of the top five
industries in Lake County
Health Care and Social Assistance
is the largest industry sector
(34,824 jobs).
Accommodation and Food
Services is the smallest of the top
industry sectors with 18,124 jobs.
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – Complete Employment
section 03
Health Care & Social
Assistance
14.4%
Government
11.9%
Retail Trade
11.3%
Manufacturing
10.5%
Accommodation
& Food Services
7.5%
All Other Industries
44.4%
19
Industry distribution and changeNAICS Code Description Jobs 2012 % Change (2002-2012) Earnings 2013
11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 639 -10.9% $18,551
21 Mining, Quarrying and Oil and Gas Extraction 176 -27.9% $107,293
22 Utilities 1,730 1.7% $126,479
23 Construction 17,788 25.1% $85,919
31-33 Manufacturing 25,290 -11.7% $107,534
42 Wholesale Trade 6,076 -13.3% $66,946
44-45 Retail Trade 27,407 -4.9% $26,118
48-49 Transportation and Warehousing 10,842 20.7% $53,948
51 Information 1,935 -23.3% $43,244
52 Finance and Insurance 7,201 3.1% $42,461
53 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 8,339 23.7% $23,385
54 Professional, Scientific and Technical Services 8,829 4.4% $46,116
55 Management of Companies and Enterprises 1,793 36.8% $99,665
56 Administrative and Waste Management 11,827 1.0% $27,577
61 Educational Services (Private) 4,541 56.9% $26,907
62 Health Care and Social Assistance 34,824 20.1% $48,699
71 Arts, Entertainment and Recreation 7,652 -17.1% $28,730
72 Accommodation and Food Services 18,134 17.4% $15,376
81 Other Services (except Public Administration) 18,049 25.9% $20,526
90 Government 28,830 -3.7% $48,730
99 Unclassified Industry <10 - $54,835
All Total 241,901 - $48,711
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2013.2 Complete Employment
section 03
20
Industry distribution and change
The largest employment gains
in Lake County occurred in:
Private Educational Services (+56.9
percent)
Management of Companies and
Enterprises (+36.8 percent)
The largest employment losses
occurred in:
Mining, Quarrying and Oil and Gas
Extraction (-27.9 percent)
Information (-23.3 percent)
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2013.2 Complete Employment
section 03
Employment Increase Employment Decrease
Changes in the top five industry sectors (2002-
2012):
Health Care and
Social Assistance
Accommodation
and Food Services
Government
Retail Trade
Manufacturing
21
Office &
Administrative
Support
13%
Sales & Related
12%
Food Preparation
& Serving Related
8%
Transportation &
Material Moving
7%
Production
7%
All Other Occupations
53%
Top five occupations in 2012
The top five occupations in
Lake County represent 47.3
percent of all jobs.
Office and Administrative Support and
Sales and Related are the occupations
with the largest number of workers.
The Production occupation cluster is the
smallest of the top five clusters in the
county (seven percent of jobs).
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2013.2 Complete Employment
section 03
22
SOC Description Jobs 2012 % Change (2002-2012) Hourly Earnings 2013
11 Management 10,733 7.4% $33.50
13 Business and Financial Operations 7,811 12.3% $26.86
15 Computer and Mathematical 1,903 -2.0% $28.88
17 Architecture and Engineering 2,882 -3.4% $35.56
19 Life, Physical and Social Science 1,440 16.7% $28.99
21 Community and Social Service 3,070 9.1% $19.00
23 Legal 1,730 1.9% $45.03
25 Education, Training and Library 12,273 11.0% $20.72
27 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports and Media 4,752 7.3% $14.79
29 Health Care Practitioners and Technical 14,845 12.4% $32.61
31 Health Care Support 7,494 25.0% $12.47
33 Protective Service 5,396 -8.8% $17.47
35 Food Preparation and Serving Related 19,388 9.6% $9.68
37 Building and Grounds Cleaning Maintenance 8,978 11.4% $11.18
39 Personal Care and Service 15,346 42.0% $10.15
41 Sales and Related 30,286 -0.6% $14.22
43 Office and Administrative Support 30,468 -4.8% $15.13
45 Farming, Fishing and Forestry 224 -10.4% $11.51
47 Construction and Extraction 14,682 18.1% $25.89
49 Installation, Maintenance and Repair 11,186 3.1% $22.67
51 Production 15,967 -8.9% $20.78
53 Transportation and Material Moving 18,194 1.0% $18.01
55 Military 1,672 4.1% $19.39
99 Unclassified 1,181 25.5% $11.18
All Total 241,901 100% $18.91
Occupation distribution and change
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2013.2 Complete Employment
section 03
23
Occupation distribution and change
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2013.2 Complete Employment
section 03
The largest percentage gains in
jobs in Lake County occurred in:
Personal Care and Service (+42
percent)
Health Care Support (+25 percent)
The largest percentage loss in
employment occurred in:
Farming, Fishing and Forestry (-10.4
percent)
Production (-8.9 percent)
Changes in the top five occupations (2002-
2012):
Food Preparation
and Serving
Transportation
and Material
Moving
Sales and
Related
Office and
Administrative
Production
Employment Increase Employment Decrease
24
Income and poverty
2000 2006 2012
Total Population in
Poverty11.1% 16.7% 19.6%
Minors (up to age
17) in Poverty15.6% 26.5% 31.3%
Real Median
Income (2012)$53,734 $52,327 $48,015
The median income in
Lake County dipped by
$5,700 between 2000
and 2012.
Both the total population in
poverty and the number of
minors in poverty increased.
The number of minors in
poverty doubled between
2000 and 2012.
Economy
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE)
section 03
25
Income and povertyMedian income in Lake County has decreased in recent years, while poverty has continued to increase.
Economy
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE)
section 03
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
Po
pu
lati
on
in
Pove
rty
(pe
rce
nt)
Re
al M
ed
ian
In
co
me
in
20
12
(d
olla
rs)
Median Income
Minors in Poverty
All Ages in
Poverty
26
Takeaways
All establishment growth in Lake County
occurred in businesses having fewer than
10 employees. So, focusing on the needs
of the self-employed (Stage 0) and start-
ups (Stage 1) establishments may be
worthwhile.
The food industry, health care, management,
education and transportation are employment
growth areas for Lake County. These are
industries and occupations that demand
workers with varying educational levels.
Median income has decreased and poverty has
increased in Lake County since 2000.
Lake County might focus on policies and programs
that strengthen high-growth Stage 2 firms since
they employ several people and capture sizable
sales.
Promoting job growth for occupations requiring
educated workers could help retain adults with
higher educational attainment and help increase
median income.
Services targeted to poverty-stricken individuals
should be considered given the dramatic rise in
poverty, especially among children under 18 years
old.
Economy
section 03
Labor force and
unemployment
Laborshed
Commuteshed
Takeaways
04labor
market
28
Labor force and unemployment
2002 2012
Labor Force 227,989 220,793
Unemployment
Rate6.4% 9.2%
The labor force in Lake County
decreased by 3.1 percent
between 2002 and 2012.
This decrease is likely due to a rise
in the number of individuals who
are either officially unemployed or
who have given up looking for a
job.
Labor market
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics – Local Area Unemployment Statistics
section 04
29
Unemployment rateBetween 2002 and 2012, the unemployment rate in Lake County peaked at 10.9 percent in 2010.
Labor market
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics – Local Area Unemployment Statistics
section 04
3.6%
6.4%
5.2%
10.9%
9.2%
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
Un
em
plo
yme
nt
Ra
te (
%)
Year
30
Commuteshed
A county’s commuteshed is
the geographic area to which
its work force travels to work.
Forty-one percent of employed
residents in Lake County commute
to jobs located outside of Lake
County.
The top commuteshed counties for
Lake County residents who work
outside of the county are Cook
County, Illinois, and Porter County,
Indiana.
Labor market
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD)
section 04
83,806
Out-Commuters
120,585
Same Work/
Home
Commuters Proportion
Cook, IL 39,960 19.6%
Porter, IN 11,061 5.4%
Marion, IN 5,295 2.6%
Will, IL 3,341 1.6%
DuPage, IL 3,156 1.5%
31
Laborshed
Commuters Proportion
Porter, IN 25,554 13.2%
Cook, IL 14,026 7.2%
La Porte, IN 4,685 2.4%
Jasper, IN 3,131 1.6%
Marion, IN 2,527 1.3%
Labor market
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD)
section 04
72,982
In-Commuters
120,585
Same Work/
Home
A county’s laborshed is the
geographic area from which it
draws employees.
Thirty-eight percent of individuals
working in Lake County commute from
another county for work. Porter County,
Indiana, and Cook County, Illinois, are
the biggest sources of outside labor for
Lake County.
Sixty-four percent of in-commuters
reside in counties adjacent to Lake
County; however, the fifth largest
laborshed county is the Indianapolis
metropolitan area (Marion County,
Indiana).
32
Commuteshed in 2011
Labor market
section 04
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OTM, LEHD, PCRD
Eighty percent of Lake County’s
working residents are employed
either in Lake or Cook Counties.
Another five percent commute to
Porter, while an additional five
percent travel to jobs in DuPage,
Will, LaPorte or Marion Counties.
Collectively, these seven
counties represent 90 percent of
the commuteshed for Lake
County.
33
Laborshed in 2011
Labor market
section 04
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OTM, LEHD, PCRD
The bulk (80 percent) of Lake
County’s workforce is drawn from
Lake and Porter Counties.
Another five percent is drawn from
LaPorte County in Indiana and
Cook County in Illinois. An
additional five percent comes
from Will County in Illinois and
Saint Joseph, Jasper and Marion
Counties in Indiana. Combined,
the eight counties represent 90
percent of Lake County’s
laborshed.
34
Takeaways
Lake County’s unemployment rate has increased
since 2002. The majority of this increase
occurred during the period of the Great
Recession (approximately 2009—10).
Despite population increases, the county’s labor
force has decreased since 2002, indicating that
there may be an increasing number of individuals
who are unemployed or are discouraged workers
(workers who have given up trying to find a job).
Employees that work but do not live in Lake
County tend to commute from surrounding
counties. People who commute out of the county
for work tend to travel to other metropolitan
areas.
Lake County should assess if a major workforce
development training effort should be targeted
to the growing number of working age adults
struggling to find jobs.
The laborshed and commuteshed
data offer solid evidence of the value
of pursuing economic and workforce
development on a regional (multi-
county) basis.
Labor market
section 04
35
Report ContributorsThis report was prepared by the Purdue Center for Regional Development in partnership with Purdue University Extension.
Labor market
section 04
Data AnalysisIndraneel Kumar, PhD
Ayoung Kim
Report AuthorsElizabeth Dobis
Bo Beaulieu, PhD
Report DesignTyler Wright
Adeline Jackson
For more information,
please contact PCRD
at
765-494-7273The Purdue Center for Regional Development (PCRD) seeks to pioneer
new ideas and strategies that contribute to regional collaboration,
innovation and prosperity.