Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Simulations 2. Sensitive area of the detection plane 3. Example of a...

8
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Simulations 2. Sensitive area of the detection plane 3. Example of a workable solution 4. Geometrical efficiency of the photon detecting plane 5. Conclusion October 19, 2005 Gh. Grégoire Contents
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    215
  • download

    0

Transcript of Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Simulations 2. Sensitive area of the detection plane 3. Example of a...

Could CKOV1 become RICH?

1. Simulations2. Sensitive area of the detection plane3. Example of a workable solution4. Geometrical efficiency of the photon detecting plane

5. Conclusion

October 19, 2005

Gh. Grégoire

Contents

Focusing geometries

Non exhaustive ! Very preliminary ! Not optimized

Plane mirror

Spherical mirror

R=-1100 mm

Parabolic mirror

Rcurv=-1500 mm = -1

= 0

Spheroidal mirror

Rcurv= -600 mm along X

Rcurv=-1100 mm along Y

More x-focusing obviously needed !

Goal: Č light produced at the focus to get a parallel beam after reflection and placing the detecting plane perpendicularly (for easy simulation/reconstruction)

400 mm

2

12

00

mm

1200 mm

Simulations

• Momenta 190 to 280 MeV/c ( in steps of 10 MeV/c )

• Gaussian beams x-y = 50 mm

x’-y’ = 25 mrad

From S. Kahn’s presentation, Phone conf. March 31, 2005

• Water radiator 20-mm thick

n=1.33

Index not too high to decrease size of rings

Index not too low to get enough photoelectrons

• (Spheroidal) biconic mirror at 45° (curvatures not optimized)

• Particles Muons, pions and electrons (10 kevts each)

Diameter = 250 mm

3

Full beam

700 mm

700 mm

Muons only

700 mm

700 mm

Pixel size 1 mm x 1 mm

Losses < 5 10-

4

Biconic mirror ( not optimized )

280 MeV/c190 MeV/c

• The detecting plane does not have to be sensitive over the full area

Faint ring due to aberrations …

• For all muon momenta covered by MICE,

For all impact positions and directions at the radiator135 < Radius of Č rings < 275 mm

4

Detection element

Hamamatsu assembly H8711 based on R7600 multianode PMT

Imagine the detection plane is equiped with multianode PMTs like Hamamatsu H7600.

16 pixels 4 x 4 mm eachSquare PM 26 x 26 mm

Just an example ! Not a proposal !

Gain 3.5 106 12 stages bialkali 300 < < 600 nm

5

Detection plane

Annular coverage270 mm < D < 550

mm

6

Detected photons

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

0 20 40 60 80 100

Nr detected photons

Nr of photons reaching the detection plane = 89

(for muons of 280 MeV/c)

assuming 100% light collection efficiency

Average nr of anodes hits = 79

For Cherenkov rings, originating from muons hitting any position on the radiator

Geometrical efficiency =89 % 7

Conclusion

1. One still gets enough photons to determine the radii of the rings

2. Next task:

- a lot of optimization

- detailed studies of aberrations with particles off axis

8

- to ease the simulation and analysis- but aberrations will not destroy the separation possibilities

• check that - separation at analysis level is still acceptable

With a rough granularity of the photon detecting plane

• define a simple algorithm to identify pions from muons

- the choice of a photon detection technique

This is still a feasibility study confirming that CKOV1 could be made RICH

To become a serious design work it needs