Correction News Fourth Quarter 2004 Correction NewsectionNews
Correction
1
1378 Boulet et al May 2003 Am J Obstet Gynecol 24. Öçer F, Kaleli S, Budak E, Oral E. Fetal weight estimation and prediction of fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic pregnant women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;83:47-52. 25. Weeks JW, Pitman T, Spinnato JA II. Fetal macrosomia: does an- tenatal prediction affect delivery route and outcome? Am J Ob- stet Gynecol 1995;173:1215-9. 26. Kolderup LB, Laros RK, Musci TJ. Incidence of persistent birth injury in macrosomic infants: association with mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:37-41. 27. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia di- agnosed by ultrasound. JAMA 1996;276:1480-6. 28. National Center for Health Statistics. 1995, 1996, 1997 Birth Co- hort Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Sets, NCHS CD-ROM Se- ries 20, Numbers 12a, 14a, 15a, ASCII Version, US Dept Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Preven- tion. Available from: www.cdc.gov/nchs. 29. Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M. Quantifying the adequacy of pre- natal care: a comparison of indices. Public Health Rep 1996; 111:408-18. 30. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Report of the na- tality statistics, 1995 (monthly vital statistics report: vol 45, no 11, supp 2). Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Sta- tistics; 1997. Correction In the letter by Sharma and El-Refaey, the second author’s name was misspelled. The cor- rect citation is Sharma S, El-Refaey H. The use of misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent in operative hysteroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:297-8.
-
Upload
nguyenduong -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Correction
1378 Boulet et al May 2003Am J Obstet Gynecol
24. Öçer F, Kaleli S, Budak E, Oral E. Fetal weight estimation andprediction of fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic pregnantwomen. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;83:47-52.
25. Weeks JW, Pitman T, Spinnato JA II. Fetal macrosomia: does an-tenatal prediction affect delivery route and outcome? Am J Ob-stet Gynecol 1995;173:1215-9.
26. Kolderup LB, Laros RK, Musci TJ. Incidence of persistent birthinjury in macrosomic infants: association with mode of delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:37-41.
27. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP. The effectivenessand costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia di-agnosed by ultrasound. JAMA 1996;276:1480-6.
28. National Center for Health Statistics. 1995, 1996, 1997 Birth Co-hort Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Sets, NCHS CD-ROM Se-ries 20, Numbers 12a, 14a, 15a, ASCII Version, US Dept Healthand Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Preven-tion. Available from: www.cdc.gov/nchs.
29. Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M. Quantifying the adequacy of pre-natal care: a comparison of indices. Public Health Rep 1996;111:408-18.
30. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Report of the na-tality statistics, 1995 (monthly vital statistics report: vol 45, no11, supp 2). Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Sta-tistics; 1997.
CorrectionIn the letter by Sharma and El-Refaey, the second author’s name was misspelled. The cor-
rect citation is Sharma S, El-Refaey H. The use of misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent inoperative hysteroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:297-8.
