CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT 2010...CO CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
Corporate Social Responsibility and Culture
-
Upload
syed-muhammad-asim -
Category
Documents
-
view
71 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Corporate Social Responsibility and Culture
International Business Environment
ABERDEEN BUSINESS SCHOOL
BSM029: International Business Environment
Individual Coursework
SUBMITTED BY: Syed Muhammad Asim (1214852)
Module Co-Coordinator: Dr. David Jones
Msc International Business
6 January 2014
Word Count: 4000
The Robert Gordon University Page 1
International Business Environment
Executive Summary
In this report focus is on the issue of managing supply chain effectively in order to
eliminate and restrict the Corporate Social Responsibility statement breach due to
supplier being in different country with different cultural values, the company
chosen which has been already exposed to this issue is Apple Inc whose supplier in
China Pegatran group has violated workers right by abusing workers, making them
work long hours and providing inappropriate working conditions, whereas Apple Inc
has a CSR statement which promises to provide safe and secure working conditions
throughout its supply chain, implications of a breach of CSR is severe resulting in
negative publicity of Apple Inc brand.
Industry which has been looked upon in this report is electronics, whereas sector is
manufacturing.
Furthermore the strategic tools, frameworks and models used in this report are,
SWOT analysis focused on Strength and Weaknesses only, PEST analysis, McKinsey
7S Framework, Hofstede national cultural difference theory and finally VRIN
Framework.
The report was finalized with the usage of secondary resources such as, articles,
book, journals and websites.
Lastly Samsung supply chain management benchmarking was given as one of the
recommendation for Apple Inc in order to overcome the issue of managing supply
chain effectively.
The Robert Gordon University Page 2
International Business Environment
Contents
Executive Summary...................................................................................................2
1.0 Introduction..........................................................................................................5
2.0 Corporate Social Responsibility, Culture and Supply Chain..................................6
2.1 CSR.................................................................................................................... 6
2.2 Culture..............................................................................................................7
2.3 Supply Chain.....................................................................................................7
2.4 The Issue and its Relevancy..............................................................................7
3.0 Apple Inc and the CSR issue.................................................................................9
3.1 Labor and Human right issues at Apple inc supplier in China............................9
3.2 CSR and Supply Chain Auditing at Apple Inc...................................................10
3.3 The Current Issue with Apple inc.....................................................................10
4.0 External Environment of Manufacturing sector..................................................11
4.1 Supply Chain Model of Apple Inc.....................................................................11
4.2 Political/Legal policies.....................................................................................14
4.3 Economic Environment....................................................................................14
4.4 Technological Environment.............................................................................15
5.0 Internal Environment of Apple Inc......................................................................16
5.1 McKinsey 7S Framework..................................................................................16
5.2 Hofstede National Culture differences Theory.................................................17
5.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Apple Inc..........................................................18
5.4 VRIN Framework for Apple Inc.........................................................................19
5.5 Initiatives.........................................................................................................21
6.0 Recommendation and Conclusion......................................................................22
7.0 References.........................................................................................................24
The Robert Gordon University Page 3
International Business Environment
List of table and Figures
Table 1: Showing the obligations of CSR..........................................Page:7
Table 2: Showing the PEST analysis of manufacturing sector in China and United
States.........................................................................................Page:14
Table 3: Showing the 3 dimensions.................................................Page:18
Table 4: Showing the Strengths and Weaknesses of Apple Inc............Page:19
Table 5: Showing further initiatives which Apple Inc has taken...........Page:22
Table 6: Summarizing the whole issue and recommendations............Page:24
Figure 1: Showing the Supple chain model of Apple Inc......................Page:12
Figure 2: Showing the 7S framework...............................................Page:17
Figure 3: Showing the VRIN Framework...........................................Page:21
The Robert Gordon University Page 4
International Business Environment
1.0 Introduction
Apple Inc. (Apple) designs, manufactures and markets mobile communication and
media devices, personal computers, and portable digital music players, and sells a
variety of related software, services, peripherals, networking solutions, and third-
party digital content and applications (Forbes, 2013).
The electronics industry scope cannot be restricted to mass-market products that
are produced in millions and even billions of pieces a year (mobile phones, TVs, PCs,
etc.). Mass-market products ‘only’ represented 53% of the electronics industry in
2008. The electronics scope also encompasses embedded electronics in transport
(cars, planes, trains, etc.), in defense equipment, in IT infrastructures as well as
electronics used in manufacturing process or professional services in order to boost
productivity (Decision, 2009).
The key factors governing the growth of electrical and electronics industry are as
follows:
Rising and continuous investments in research and development has led to
increased productivity and higher-value added electrical and electronics
products.
Increased foreign investments have resulted in the accelerated growth in
terms of electronics production and exports. Foreign companies are now
making huge investments and are installing extensive production capacities
in developing countries.
Extends support to several global industries namely medical,
telecommunications, industrial and automotive sectors.
Rising incomes and living standards have resulted in the increase in demand
of electronics especially consumer electronics products in the world.
(Digitivity, 2013)
The Robert Gordon University Page 5
International Business Environment
2.0 Corporate Social Responsibility, Culture and Supply
Chain
2.1 CSR
According to Brusseau (2013), the title corporate social responsibility has two
meanings. First, it’s a general name for any theory of the corporation that
emphasizes both the responsibility to make money and the responsibility to interact
ethically with the surrounding community. Second, corporate social responsibility is
also a specific conception of that responsibility to profit while playing a role in
broader questions of community welfare.
As a specific theory of the way corporations interact with the surrounding
community and larger world, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is composed of
four obligations:
Table 1: Showing the obligations of CSR
The Economic responsibility to make money. Required by simple economics, this obligation is the business version of the human survival instinct. Companies that don’t make profits are—in a modern market economy—doomed to perish. (Brusseau, 2013)
The Ethical responsibility to do what’s right even when not required by the letter or spirit of the law. This is the theory’s keystone obligation, and it depends on a coherent corporate culture that views the business itself as a citizen in society, with the kind of obligations that citizenship normally entails. (Brusseau, 2013)
The Legal responsibility to adhere to rules and regulations. Like the previous, this responsibility is not controversial. What proponents of CSR argue, however, is that this obligation must be understood as a proactive duty. That is, laws aren’t boundaries that enterprises skirt and cross over if the penalty is low; instead, responsible organizations accept the rules as a social good and make good faith efforts to obey not just the letter but also the spirit of the limits. (Brusseau, 2013)
The Philanthropic responsibility to contribute to society’s projects even when they’re independent of the particular business. A lawyer driving home from work may spot the local children gathered around a makeshift lemonade stand and sense an obligation to buy a drink to contribute to the neighborhood project. (Brusseau, 2013)
Generated by Student
The Robert Gordon University Page 6
International Business Environment
2.2 Culture
‘Culture is a fuzzy set of basic assumptions and values, orientations to life, beliefs,
policies, procedures and behavioral conventions that are shared by a group of
people, and that influence (but do not determine) each member’s behavior and
his/her interpretations of the ‘meaning’ of other people’s behavior. (Oatey, 2012)
The research of Geert Hofstede (2013), has shown that cultural differences
between nations are especially found on the deepest level; i.e. on the level of
values. In comparison, cultural differences among organizations are especially
identified on the level of practices. Practices are more tangible than values.
2.3 Supply Chain
According to Meindl et al (2004), A supply chain consists of all parties involved,
directly or indirectly, in fulfilling a customer request. The supply chain not only
includes the manufacturer and suppliers, but also transporters, warehouses,
retailers, and customers themselves. Within each organization, such as
manufacturer, the supply chain includes all functions involved in receiving and
filling a customer request. These functions include, but are not limited to, new
product development, marketing, operations, distribution, finance, and customer
service.
According to Lambert et al (2001) Supply chain management is increasingly being
recognized as the integration of key business processes across the supply chain. For
example, Streamlining cross-company processes is the next great frontier for
reducing costs, enhancing quality, and speeding operations. It is where this
decade’s productivity wars will be fought. The victors will be those companies that
are able to take a new approach to business, working closely with partners to
design and manage processes that extend across traditional corporate boundaries.
They will be the ones that make the leap from efficiency to super efficiency.
2.4 The Issue and its Relevancy
The main issue here is the effective management of supply chain when following
CSR principles, especially when supplier is in another country which has different
culture. Not being able to live up on any principle of CSR as stated in table 1, should
effect the image of the company adversely.
The Robert Gordon University Page 7
International Business Environment
According to Yoon et al (2006), CSR activities improve a company's image when
consumers attribute sincere motives, are ineffective when sincerity of motives is
ambiguous, and hurt the company's image when motives are perceived as insincere
or even if there is an breach of CSR statement presented by company.
Culture plays a significant role in such failures of CSR statement if it involves a
breach of CSR down the supply chain and if company has branch in more than one
country following a CSR based in one region where cultural preferences are different
in other region, for example, company originating from America believes in
following ethical values in the work place but has a supplier which is from China
who does not have same cultural preference and those ethical values practiced in
America might not be seen in China and lead to failure of CSR.
Since there are a lot of companies all around the world which have adopted the
practice of CSR yet they fail to follow all of its principle as stated in table 1,
especially, doing something unethical.
Such short comings on promises of following CSR brings in bad reputation for the
company, reduction in share prices (Kolbel, 2005), reduction in share holder value
(Robinson et al, 2008).
According to Bilson (2010), "An obvious example of bad publicity from bad
corporate social responsibility at play and the effect that bad social responsibility
has on a company, is Enron, the Texan energy company that not only brought itself
down but also one of the largest accounting firms at that time, Arthur Andersen.
Enron was a darling of corporate philanthropy and gave millions in charity donations
to charity organizations and won several awards for its corporate social
responsibility work, including a climate protection award from the EPA and a
corporate conscience award from the Council on Economic Priorities". As it can be
learnt that the issue of not living up to CSR statement launched by the company
brings about disastrous outcomes.
3.0 Apple Inc and the CSR issue
As discussed in the earlier part of this report, that not living up to the CSR
statement can bring bad reputation to the company, an organization which has
The Robert Gordon University Page 8
International Business Environment
been recently exposed to this issue is Apple inc, their suppliers in China have
breached the Apple inc CSR statement and now Apple inc is taking various
initiatives to deal with this, initiatives taken by Apple inc will be discussed in detail
in the later part of this report.
3.1 Labor and Human right issues at Apple inc supplier in China
Since Apple inc deals in manufacturing sector, it has suppliers in China which
manufacture products on Apple inc behalf.
According to Torres et al (2012), A well-known conflict involving Apple’s suppliers is
the suicides at Foxconn. It is the largest contracted electronics manufacturer in the
world, with dealings involving Dell and Sony.
Foxconn is the manufacturer of iPhones and iPads and employs over 900,000
workers, of whom 420,000 employees work at the Foxconn Shenzhen plant. This
plant covers 15 factories, including dormitories, a hospital, a bank, a grocery store
and restaurants. The workers live and work inside the complex.
In 2006 the Chinese local press reported on the excessively long working hours and
the discrimination of mainland Chinese workers by Taiwanese superiors. In May
2010 several media sources reported several cases of suicide at Foxconn. From
2009 to 2010 a total of 13 workers had committed suicide. The first worker, Sun
Danyong, committed suicide after he had been interrogated on the loss of an
iPhone 4 prototype that he had in his possession. When the former CEO Steve Jobs
was asked about the suicides at Foxconn, he responded: ‘Foxconn is not a
sweatshop.’ (Torres et al, 2012)
During an undercover investigation it was discovered that the reason for the
multiple suicides was related to internal management. ‘The facilities of Foxconn are
fine, but the management is poor,’ (Torres et al, 2012).
3.2 CSR and Supply Chain Auditing at Apple Inc
According to Torres et al (2012), Apple makes sure that suppliers comply with the
Supplier Code by conducting audits. The audits cover working and living conditions,
health and safety but also environmental practices at the facilities.
The Robert Gordon University Page 9
International Business Environment
According to Apple’s Supplier Responsibility Report 2010, Apple conducted 102
audits in 2009. In 2011 Apple conducted 229 audits, an increase of 80% compared
to 2010. An audit is conducted by an Apple auditor and supported by local third-
party auditors.
In the Supplier Responsibility Report 2010, published in February 2011, Apple
included a paragraph responding to the suicides at Foxconn. In the Supplier
Responsibility Report 2011, Apple reports that during inspections Apple discovered
ten facilities with underage labor violations. One of the facilities had a large number
of underage workers. Because the management did not want to address the
problem, Apple terminated businesses with this facility.
3.3 The Current Issue with Apple inc
The importance of CSR is growing rapidly (Allirajah, 2013), many organizations have
adopted the practice of CSR yet not all have been successful at it. As it can be
noticed in table 1, the four obligations a company should follow, but the issue arises
when companies like Apple inc produce a CSR statement as such " Workers
everywhere should have the right to safe and ethical working conditions. They
should also have access to educational opportunities to improve their lives. Through
a continual cycle of inspections, improvement plans, and verification, we work with
our suppliers to make sure they comply with our Code of Conduct and live up to
these ideals" (Apple inc, 2013).
This statement of Apple inc was proved wrong when in China, Technology giant
Apple is facing fresh allegations of worker rights violations at Chinese factories of
one of its suppliers, the Pegatron Group. (BBC News, 2013)
The main issue behind such short fall of CSR statement by Apple inc could be
related to the cultural differences between China and America, as Apple inc is a
company originating from United states and with implementing ethical practices
which are norm in United States, such practices in China however are not a norm
and worker abuse is very relevant there, as there have been numerous cases of
such worker abuse in China.
Cultural difference between where organizations operate is a highly important issue
which needs to addressed as it has direct impact on the welfare of the organizations
The Robert Gordon University Page 10
International Business Environment
in the world of work today and reflect how ineffective management of supply chain
can literally effect the image and well being of the company.
4.0 External Environment of Manufacturing sector
4.1 Supply Chain Model of Apple Inc
Figure 1: Showing the Supple chain model of Apple Inc
Source: Supply Chain OPZ (2013)
Figure 1, clearly shows how Apple Inc operates it supply chain, manufacturing is done in China, whereas distribution is done from America mostly.
Such supply chain model has only been possible due to external influences.
As Apple inc is sourcing its business from United States and manufacturing it in China the reasoning behind it can be found by analyzing the external environment of manufacturing sector in United States and China.
The Robert Gordon University Page 11
International Business Environment
According to Downey (2007), PEST analysis is a scan of the external macro-
environment in which an organization exists. It is a useful tool for understanding the
political, economic, socio-cultural and technological environment that an
organization operates in. It can be used for evaluating market growth or decline,
and as such the position, potential and direction for a business.
In this particular case the most relevant element of PEST analysis would be,
Political, Economic and Technological.
The Robert Gordon University Page 12
International Business Environment
Table 2: Showing the PEST analysis of manufacturing sector in China and United
States
PEST China United StatesPolitical/Legal Reduction in corporate tax
policies of China. (WEF, 2013)No minimum wage legislation. (Wage indicator, 2013)Policy of opening up the China manufacturing sector to the whole world. (WEF, 2013)The country’s 12th Five-Year Plan, will further enhance manufacturing sector performance in China. (Deloitte, 2013)
The manufacturing industry in the US has been affected by the new regulations that have been passed by a number of government agencies over the last thirty years. Approximately 2,183 unique regulations had been passed that affect the growth of the manufacturing sector. (Murray, 2013)Minimum wage legislation.
Economic Exchange rate of China is stable and value of currency is increasing. (Index mundi, 2013)Inflation rate in China decreased in 2012 as compared to 2011. (Index mundi, 2013)More exports than imports, favorable trade balance.Growing manufacturing industry. (WEF, 2013)
Inflation rate at 2.1% in 2012, lower than that of 3.1% in 2011. (Index mundi, 2013).Exchange rate has devalued since 2011. still stable. (Index mundi, 2013)More imports than exports.Growth in manufacturing industry. (Murray, 2013)
Technological Good infrastructure, availability of telecommunication, internet and transportation. (Index mundi, 2013)
Very good infrastructure, Availability of highly advanced technology, internet and various advanced methods of transportation. (Index mundi, 2013)
Generated by Student
The Robert Gordon University Page 13
International Business Environment
As it can be noticed under table 2, that various external forces influences the well
being of manufacturing industry in China and United States.
It is indeed these forces which have allowed Apple Inc to have a supply chain which
consist of various countries and have a supplier which manufactures in China,
however it is the responsibility of Apple Inc to maintain the effectiveness and
standards of workplace its supplier engages in.
4.2 Political/Legal policies
Due to different external environment in China and United States, such as political
and legal policies, in China there is no minimum wage legislation and worker abuse
is a common norm (Wage indicator, 2013). Hence it would make perfect sense of
Apple Inc to avoid paying high wages in United States and have manufacturing
being done in China where wage levels are very low as compared to United States.
The Government of China has moved from close economy to open economy in 1970
(Index mundi, 2013), whereby inviting foreign firms to do business in China, again
makes perfect sense for Apple Inc to take benefit from such favorable policies.
The Issue however arises, when Apple Inc cannot control the actions of its suppliers
in China, due to the ability of misusing workers right in China is a common practice
and various Chinese manufacturers do it (BBC News, 2013) as Government does not
intervene and is not as effective in taking action compared to the Government of
United States, the political and legal environment of China could be related to the
birth of this issue.
4.3 Economic Environment
As it can be seen in table 2, most of the indicators show that the economy of China
is doing very well, yet a problem is with unemployment rate in China which is 6.5%
as of 2012 (Index mundi, 2013) with the vast population China has this amounts to
a significant number.
Hence it can be assumed that even if a worker is unhappy with his workplace
environment in China, he would still want to work to support his family and meet
daily needs, and this gives another reason to manufacturing firms in China to abuse
The Robert Gordon University Page 14
International Business Environment
worker, make them work over 70 hours per week in order to get work done as was
the case with pegatron group the Apple Inc China supplier (BBC News, 2013).
Apple Inc has concrete reasons to have a supplier from China as inflation rate in
China has a decreasing trend since 2008 (Index mundi, 2013) showing there won't
be any inflation problem which Apple Inc would be bothered with.
Exchange rate of United States has been stable but loosing value against Chinese
currency RMB over last 5 years (Index mundi, 2013) this would only mean each year
Apple Inc has to pay more for importing electric goods from China. Yet it is still
profitable as cost of production to make Apple Inc products in United States would
be higher as compared to China.
4.4 Technological Environment
Technological environment of China is great as it can be seen in table 2, the change
in how world operates now, availability of transportation services through ships has
made it possible for a company such as Apple Inc to do business with a company
pegatron group in China and have products delivered in time.
It can be said that, the most important external force which has contributed the
most in the issue of worker right violation in China is indeed the government rules
and regulations as they are not as strict as of the government in United States it
allows domestic manufacturers to make use of it and exploit any loop hole in
policies.
PEST analysis is a perfect tool to analyze this particular issue and why does it exist
and how did Apple Inc manage to be part of it, as external forces allowed Apple Inc
to do business with Chinese suppliers and Chinese suppliers were able to exploit
workers as policies of government of China were not as robust and rigid. one thing
links to another and PEST provides the overview of every external environment
element, although in this particular case the most relevant would be political and
legal framework.
The Robert Gordon University Page 15
International Business Environment
5.0 Internal Environment of Apple Inc
In this section cultural perspective would be used in order to understand the issue
from Apple Inc perspective.
5.1 McKinsey 7S Framework
According to Wilkinson (2008), in the 7S-model the so-called ‘hard and ’soft’
elements are incorporated, in which hard elements aim at matters an organization
can influence directly. The soft elements are present in an organization in a more
abstract way and can be found in the organizational culture. The hard elements in
the 7S-model are Strategy, Structure and Systems, the soft elements are Style,
Shared Values, Skills and Staff.
Figure 2: Showing the 7S framework
Source: Vliet (2012)
The Robert Gordon University Page 16
International Business Environment
As it can be seen in figure 2, that the most important part of 7S framework is the
soft element share values, which is usually found in organization culture. Apple Inc
in their CSR statement has clearly tried to incorporate the shared values in their
supply chain (Apple, 2013), but unfortunately they failed, as to begin with the
culture between United States and China is totally different and having to
incorporate shared values on such level is even more challenging.
5.2 Hofstede National Culture differences Theory
According to Hofstede & Waisfisz (2013), there are six dimensions which provide
why there is difference between organizations in different national boundaries.
Table 3: Showing the 3 dimensions
Mean vs. Goal oriented
In a very means oriented culture people perceive themselves as avoiding risks and making only a limited effort in their jobs, while each workday is pretty much the same. In a very goal oriented culture, the employees are primarily out to achieve specific internal goals or results, even if these involve substantial risks. (Hofstede & Waisfisz, 2013)
Internally driven vs. Externally
driven
In a very internally driven culture employees perceive their task towards the outside world as totally given, based on the idea that business ethics and honesty matters most and that they know best what is good for the customer and the world at large. In a very externally driven culture the only emphasis is on meeting the customer’s requirements; results are most important and a pragmatic rather than an ethical attitude prevails. Hofstede & Waisfisz, 2013)
Employee oriented vs. work oriented
In very employee oriented organizations members of staff feel that personal problems are taken into account and that the organization takes responsibility for the welfare of its employees, even if this is at the expense of the work. In very work oriented organizations there is heavy pressure to perform the task even if this is at the expense of employees. Hofstede & Waisfisz, 2013)
Generated by Student
As it can be deduced from table 3, only the most relevant dimensions have been
selected for this report, the issue is doing business in more than one country,
different country having different culture, this leads to complications in the
practices of work.
The Robert Gordon University Page 17
International Business Environment
An example of the countries United states and China, both have different culture,
and then dimensions principle has to be matched with countries as stated in Table
3, mean oriented country in this case should be United States whereas China would
fall under Goal oriented, most of the organizations in United states believe to be
internally driven whereas in China they are externally driven, and finally the most
important is being employee oriented as compared to work oriented, China is known
for getting the work done at any cost, whereby they would even abuse worker for it,
whereas in United states such practice would result in organization being sued as
organizations there are employee oriented. (Brodt & Seybolt, 1996)
Hence such national culture differences is what can explain the failure of Apple Inc in sharing the same cultural values throughout the supply chain and the breach of its CSR statement.
5.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Apple Inc
Table 4: Showing the Strengths and Weaknesses of Apple Inc
Strength Customer loyalty combined with
expanding closed ecosystem. Apple is a leading innovator in
mobile device technology. 2012, Strong financial
performance ($10,000,000,000 cash, gross profit margin 43.9% and no debt)
Brand reputation. Strong marketing and advertising
teams
Weakness
High price Incompatibility with different OS Decreasing market share Patent infringements Further changes in management Defects of new products Long-term gross margin decline
Source: Jurevicius (2013)
As it can be seen in table 4, there are various strengths and weaknesses which
Apple Inc has, most important strength which Apple Inc has is the customer loyalty
which brings in repeat purchases and free positive word of mouth, also Apple has a
good track record of being the innovators in the electronic industry specially in
mobile device technology, along with solid financial background and finally having a
The Robert Gordon University Page 18
International Business Environment
very competent advertising and marketing team, all this amounts for the success
which Apple Inc has achieved till date.
However their weaknesses are pertinent as well, Apple Inc products are usually
higher in price as compared to different companies in the same industry, recently
Apple Inc has been experiencing a decline in its market share which could be relate
to recent death of Steve Jobs and defects in new products.
Strengths which Apple Inc has could be used to better tackle the issue of managing
supply chain in order to deliver the fulfillment of CSR statement. to be discussed
later on in this report.
5.4 VRIN Framework for Apple Inc
According to Resource-based view of strategic management, competitive advantage
is closely related to company's internal characteristics (Spanos and Lioukas, 2001).
More specifically, if a company possesses and exploits valuable, rare, inimitable and
non-substitutable resources and capabilities it will achieve sustainable competitive
advantage and above average performance (Barney, 1991).
Apple Inc might not be having all the required features of VRIN framework as being
in electronic industry it is hard to not have a substitute of mobile phone, Ipads and
laptops it is easier to even imitate products as such is the nature of the industry in
which Apple Inc operates.
However Apple Inc does have value and rareness required to achieve sustainable
advantage over competitors.
Figure 3: Showing the VRIN Framework
The Robert Gordon University Page 19
International Business Environment
Source: Marcsimony (2012)
Apple Inc has valuable resources as it is able to provide end consumers with higher
value for money product, which does not only serve the purpose of fulfilling need
but also wants are entertained. Rare in this sense of the brand reputation which
Apple Inc has, not any brand has such loyal customers and are innovators in the
mobile device technology like Apple Inc and so it can be said they have rare
resources as well, they only have issues as their products can be imitate and are
substitutable.
Figure 3, clearly shows if a company has valuable and rare resources they have
temporary competitive advantage and temporary above normal performance, Apple
Inc must use it to tackle the issue they are facing which might hurt their brand
reputation.
The Robert Gordon University Page 20
International Business Environment
5.5 Initiatives
In this section of report focus will be on the initiatives which Apple Inc has already
taken in order to deal with the mentioned issues.
Apple Inc has said "We don’t allow suppliers to act unethically or in ways that
threaten the rights of workers — even when local laws and customs permit such
practices. We’re working to end excessive work hours, prohibit unethical hiring
policies, and prevent the hiring of underage workers" (Apple Inc, 2013).
Apple Inc also believes in ending excessive work hours
In 2012, Apple began tracking supplier work hours on a weekly basis, growing our
program from 500,000 workers to over one million. Our procurement teams interact
with our suppliers on a daily basis and use this information to match labor to
demand. To help reduce working hours throughout our industry, Apple is co-leading
the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC) working group to share our
programs and practices with other organizations (Apple Inc, 2013).
Table 5: Showing further initiatives which Apple Inc has taken
Addressing underage labor
Our approach to underage labor is clear: We don’t tolerate it, and we’re working to
eradicate it from our industry. When we discover suppliers with underage workers
or find out about historical cases — where workers had either left or reached legal
working age by the time of the audit — we demand immediate corrective action as
part of our Underage Labor Remediation Program.
Providing tools to enable responsible hiring.
Last year marked the third year of our Prevention of Underage Labor training
program, an initiative to help suppliers identify and prevent underage labor. We
conducted training for 84 suppliers that were chosen because their facilities are
located in provinces at high risk for underage labor.
Source: Apple Inc (2013)
From table 5, and above mentioned initiatives it can be said that Apple Inc is trying
hard to stabilize its image in the outer world and trying best to deliver the CSR
The Robert Gordon University Page 21
International Business Environment
statement by effective management of its supply chain, However they still keep
repeating the same mistake of hiring a supplier who does not totally follow the
cultural perspective of Apple Inc and this issue needs to be dealt with much more
severe actions.
6.0 Recommendation and Conclusion
Apple Inc should benchmark supply chain practices, one the best companies in
electronic industry which is known for its effective supply chain management is
Samsung.
Apple Inc should implement six sigma for managing supply chain, as Samsung’s
effort and investment has turned out to be fruitful. Their SCM six sigma program
has produced highly qualified and talented SCM specialists, who are currently
training the methodology to other members in their organizations and leading SCM
projects (Emerald Management First, 2013).
This should allow Apple Inc to overcome the short comings it is facing in effective
management of its supply chain which is leading to the breach in CSR statement,
redesigning supply chain could also mean picking up suppliers from different region,
which could also translate to even quicker delivery of products and have same
cultural values as Apple Inc.
Samsung also has setup cross functional Team: In order to bring internal
departments closer, they use the system called “Voice of Business”. What they do is
to gather internal requirements and establish action plans based on collective
decision (Supply Chain OPZ, 2013). This should also allow Apple Inc to have less
problem in translating their cultural values down the supply chain and a shared
vision and values could be possible.
Table 6: Summarizing the whole issue and recommendations
The Robert Gordon University Page 22
International Business Environment
IssueEffective management of supply chain in order to restrict and eliminate CSR breach.
McKinsey 7s FrameworkShared values
Recommendations
StrengthsLoyal Customer's
Financially strong
Generated by Student
Finally, it can be said that, the issue of CSR breach can be solved only if Apple Inc
can implement six sigma methodology and setup cross functional team in order to
achieve shared values throughout supply chain along with the initiatives they have
already taken.
The Robert Gordon University Page 23
Six Sigma Methodology
Cross functional team
Improve communication with supplier
Strong marketing and advertising teams
International Business Environment
7.0 References
Apple Inc. 2013. Supply Responsibility at Apple [Online]. Available from:
<https://www.apple.com/supplierresponsibility/> 23 December 2013
Barney, J. B. 1991, Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage, Journal
of Management, 17, pp. 99-120
Cedillo Torres. 2013. Four Case Studies on Corporate Social Responsibility: Do
Conflicts Affect a Company's Corporate Social Responsibility Policy? [Online].
Available from: <http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/index.php/ulr/article/view/URN
%3ANBN%3ANL%3AUI%3A10-1-112903/203> 23 December 2013
CIMA. 2007. Strategic Analysis Tools [Online]. Available from:
<
http://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/ImportedDocuments/cid_tg_strategic_analys
is_tools_nov07.pdf.pdf> 18 December 2013
Chopra, Sunil and Peter Meindl. 2004. Supply Chain Management. 2 ed. Upper
Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall
David Wilkinson. 2008. Organizational Development Strategy [Online]. Available
from:
<http://www.tamesidehospital.nhs.uk/documents/ODStrategy_Nov08_final.pdf> 27
December 2013
Decision. 2009. World Electronic Industries [Online]. Available from:
<http://www.decision.eu/doc/brochures/exec_wei_current.pdf > 20 December 2013
Deloitte. 2013. Global Manufacturing Competitive Index 2013 [Online]. Available
from:
<http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/
us_pip_GMCI%20report_Supplemental%20country%20analysis_12132012.pdf> 22
December 2013
Digitivity. 2013. Electrical and Electronic Industry Overview [Online]. Available from:
<http://www.digitivity.com/industry-overview.html> 15 December 2013
The Robert Gordon University Page 24
International Business Environment
Emerald Management First. 2013. Supply chain management six sigma at Samsung
[Online]. Available from:
<http://www.supplychain247.com/images/pdfs/samsung_six_sigma_scm.pdf> 22
December 2013
Forbes. 2013. Apple [Online]. Available from:
<http://www.forbes.com/companies/apple/> 11 December 2013
Geert Hofstede. 2013. Dimensions [Online]. Available from: <http://geert-
hofstede.com/organisational-culture-dimensions.html> 12 December 2013
Helen Spencer Oatey. 2012. What is Culture? [Online]. Available from:
<http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/globalpad/openhouse/interculturalskills/
global_pad_-_what_is_culture.pdf> 20 December 2013
Index mundi. 2013. China Exchange rates [Online]. Available from:
<http://www.indexmundi.com/china/exchange_rates.html> 25 December 2013
Index mundi. 2013. China Inflation rate (Consumer prices) [Online]. Available from:
<http://www.indexmundi.com/china/inflation_rate_(consumer_prices).html> 22
December 2013
Index mundi. 2013. United States Inflation rate (Consumer prices) [Online].
Available from:
<http://www.indexmundi.com/united_states/inflation_rate_(consumer_prices).html>
24 December 2013
James Brusseau. 2013. The Business Ethics Workshop, V. 1.0 [Online]. Available
from: <http://catalog.flatworldknowledge.com/bookhub/reader/1695?e=brusseau-
ch13_s02> 10 December 2013
Jo Bilson. 2010. Effects of Bad Corporate Social Responsibility [Online]. Available
from: <http://suite101.com/a/effects-of-bad-corporate-social-responsibility-
a215647> 23 December 2013
The Robert Gordon University Page 25
International Business Environment
Julian Kolbel. 2008. The effect of bad news on reputation and share price: An
empirical survey [Online]. Available from:<
http://www.er.ethz.ch/publications/Term_Paper_KoelbelJ_0508-Grade6.pdf> 22
December 2013
Keely Croxton .L, Sebastian J. Carcia Dastugue and Douglas Lambert .M. 2001. The
Supply Chain Management Processes [Online]. Available from:
<http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/474/089/1217/article4.pdf> 27 December 2013
Martin Murray. 2013. EPA Regulations and Manufacturing [Online]. Available from:
<http://logistics.about.com/od/legalandgovernment/a/Epa-Regulations-And-
Manufacturing.htm> 21 December 2013
Marcsimony. 2012. Vrio Framework [Online]. Available from:
<http://marcsimony.wordpress.com/tag/vrio-framework/> 19 December 2013
Michael Robinson .J, Anne Kleffner and Stephanie Bertels. 2008. The Value of a
Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence [Online].
Available from: <http://www.northernfinance.org/2008/papers/221.pdf> 25
December 2013
Ovidijus Jurevicius. 2013. SWOT analysis of Apple [Online]. Available from:
<http://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/swot-analyses/apple-swot-
analysis.html> 19 December 2013
Spanos, Y. E.; Lioukas, S. 2001, An examination into the causal logic of rent
generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-
based perspective, Strategic Management Journal, 22 pp. 907-934.
Subaskaran Allirajah. 2013. The Importance of corporate social responsibility
[Online]. Available from: <http://www.growthbusiness.co.uk/the-entrepreneur/best-
business-decisions/2403537/the-importance-of-corporate-social-
responsibility.thtml> 19 December 2013
Supply Chain OPZ. 2013. 7 Best Practices that Transform Samsung supply chain
[Online]. Available from:
The Robert Gordon University Page 26
International Business Environment
<
http://www.supplychain247.com/article/7_best_practices_that_transform_samsung_e
lectronics_supply_chain> 28 December 2013
Supply Chain OPZ. 2013. IS Apple's Supply Chain Really the No.1? A Case Study
[Online]. Available from:
<
http://www.supplychain247.com/article/is_apples_supply_chain_really_the_no._1_a_c
ase_study> 22 December 2013
Susan Brodt & Patricia Seybolt. 1996. Culture and Conflict [Online]. Available from:
<
http://www.business.uconn.edu/ciber/documents/cultureandconflictrolenatlculturepe
rformancefeedbk.pdf> 21 December 2013
Truist. 2013. Why Corporate Social Responsibility is so Important [Online]. Available
from: <http://truist.com/why-corporate-social-responsibility-is-so-important-in-
2013/> 19 December 2013
Vincent Van Vliet. 2013. 7S framework (McKinsey) [Online]. Available from:
<http://www.toolshero.com/diagnosis/7s-framework-mckinsey> 20 December 2013
World Economic Forum. 2013. CEO Policy Recommendations for Emerging Economy
Nations China [Online]. Available from: <http://reports.weforum.org/manufacturing-
growth/china/> 25 December 2013
Yeosun Yoon, Zeynep Gurhan Canli and Norbert Schwarz. 2006. The Effect of
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies with Bad Reputations
[Online]. Available from:
<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057740806700833> 24
December 2013
Yu-Shu Peng, Altan Uya Dashdeleg and Hsiang Lin Chih. 2012. Does National Culture
Influence Firm's CSR Engagement: A Cross Country Study [Online]. Available from:
<http://www.ipedr.com/vol58/009-ICHCS2012-S00029.pdf> 25 December 2013
The Robert Gordon University Page 27