Corporate Programme and Project Management (PMO) …€¦ · Programme and Project Management (PMO)...
Transcript of Corporate Programme and Project Management (PMO) …€¦ · Programme and Project Management (PMO)...
Corporate
Programme and Project Management (PMO) Policy
Document Control Summary
Status: New
Version: v5.2 Date: 19/05/2016
Author/Owner/Title: Martyn Perry – Head of Programme Management Office
Approved by: Policy and Procedures Committee Date: 17 March 2016
Ratified: Trust Board Date: 18 March 2016
Related Trust Strategy and/or Strategic Aims
People who use our services are at the centre of all we do. Deliver best practice that is evidence based and effective. Responsive. Innovation. Leadership.
Implementation Date: January 2016
Review Date: January 2018
Key Words: Programme Management, Project, Project Management, CIP, PMO
Associated Policy or Standard Operating Procedures
Trust Project Lifecycle SOP
Contents
1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 2
2. Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 2
3. Scope ........................................................................................................................ 3
4. Roles and Responsibilities ...................................................................................... 3
5. Programme and Project Processes ........................................................................ 5
5.1 Project Definition ..................................................................................................... 5
5.2 Programme Definition ............................................................................................. 6
5.3 Programme and Project Governance ...................................................................... 6
5.4 Programme and Project Principles ........................................................................ 12
5.5 Programme and Project Meetings ......................................................................... 13
5.6 Project Process ..................................................................................................... 13
6. Annex 1 – SSSFT Programme Governance .......................................................... 14
Programme and Project Management (PMO) Policy/March 2016
Page 2 of 15
7. References .............................................................................................................. 15
Change Control – Amendment History
Version Dates Amendments
V1.0 22nd January 2016 Initial draft created
V2.0 7th February 2016 Processes Included
V3.0 11th February 2016 Removal of process into separate SOP
V4.0 29th February 2016 Consolidation of TMT Feedback comments and
updated SSSFT Programme Governance Diagram.
V5.0 11th March 2016 Updated with feedback from Director of Business
Development and Head of Business and Commercial
Development
V5.1 5th April 2016 Complexity Matrix and Project Brief terminology
amended
V5.2 19th May 2016 Change of policy title from Programme Management
Office Policy
1. Introduction
South Staffordshire and Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (SSSFT) routinely
undertakes multiple projects and programmes of work across all of its directorates and
divisions. To manage these schemes of work effectively, the Trust requires a robust and
comprehensive approach to project governance and management.
This Policy details the approach that should be taken by all staff across the Trust, for all
programmes and projects identified within the Trust’s Programme Management Office
(PMO).
The Policy is based on the established best practice methodologies for project and
programme management, PRINCE2 (PRojects IN Controlled Environments) and
Managing Successful Programmes (MSP), but has been tailored to best fit with the resource
availability and the requirements of the Trust.
2. Purpose
This Policy will provide consistency around project governance and management across the
Trust. Adopting a Trust wide framework for the management of programmes and projects
has the potential to provide the following benefits to the Trust:
Programme and Project Management (PMO) Policy/March 2016
Page 3 of 15
Supporting localized development of Specific, Measurable, Appropriate, Realistic
and Time based (SMART) project plans
Enabling all trust projects to be measured in the same way
Provide a greater likelihood of projects achieving the desired result
Higher return on investment success
Ensure efficient and best value use of resources
Provide greater assurance and organizational awareness of project progress and
projects with interdependencies across directorates and divisions
Satisfy the differing needs of the project’s stakeholders
Increased stakeholder satisfaction
Enhanced communication, collaboration and strategic alignment
Learning and on-going improvement in organisation performance
Reduce risk to the Trust from a financial, procurement and governance
perspective
Build project management capability within directorate and divisional teams
3. Scope
This Policy is applicable to all groups of staff involved with the review and successful
delivery of projects within the Trust.
4. Roles and Responsibilities The roles and responsibilities related to the ongoing management of projects within the organisation are outlined below:
4.1 Project Management Teams
Project management teams operating throughout all directorates and divisions in the
organization (as shown in Annex 1) have a responsibility to actively encourage compliance
with the Policy as outlined below:
Ensure that projects and programmes are appropriately governed and managed
with adherence to the project management principles (Section 5.4) depending on
whether they are low, medium, high or business critical
Manage project progress, updates and documentation through the standard
methodology, PMO templates, and reporting frequency as specified by the PMO
(Section 5)
Ensure project progress reporting routes and associated meeting Terms of
References (ToR) align with SSSFT Programme Governance (Annex 1)
Identify and engage the appropriate project management resources where
required in a timely fashion, e.g. engage with Information Management &
Technology Projects Team (IM&T Projects) for IM&T system/related projects,
the Estates project team for building projects etc.
Involve other services as appropriate, such as PMO, IM&T, Estates, Safety
and Risk, Finance and Human Resources from the beginning of projects and
throughout the delivery
Programme and Project Management (PMO) Policy/March 2016
Page 4 of 15
Inform the PMO of all projects awaiting approval and currently being undertaken,
so that a Trust Project Register can be maintained and made accessible to all
(with reference to structure in Annex 1)
Accountable for the operational project delivery within their own division and
directorate
Exception reporting where milestones and delivery dates are forecast to be
missed
4.2 Programme Management Office
The PMO Team provide a centralized project support function. Supporting the delivery of the
Trust’s programmes of work and projects managed locally by the divisions that have been
commissioned by the Trust to help achieve its strategic objectives. The PMO is responsible
for:
Implementing and assuring a standardized best practice approach to project and
programme management across the Trust
Improving, measuring and evidencing project success rates and related realized
benefits
Providing a central information repository and reporting function for all of the
Trust’s project activities. Ensuring an open and honest approach to project
management that is transparent to other divisions in terms of resource
requirements, delivery, outputs, timescales and risks
Identification of inter-dependencies, resource constraints and lessons learned
across all projects captured within the PMO
Improving communication between project teams and stakeholders between
separate directorates and divisions
Internal consultancy/mentoring on project management processes/methodologies
Training and assistance in use of MS Project as a standard software tool for
creation of SMART project plans
Liaison with Trust’s Business Development directorate, Quality and Clinical
Performance Directorate and Finance& Performance directorate to ensure all
Trust Strategic Aims, Business Plans, Quality Improvement Plans, Risk mitigation
plans and Cost Improvement Programmes inform the need for new project
creation
To ensure that the identified projects link into directorate, divisional and Trust
wide business plans
4.3 Trust Management Team (TMT):
The members of TMT act as the Programme Board for Business Critical projects and have
responsibility for:
Legitimising project goals and objectives
Monitoring progress of organizational programme and project goals, objectives
and realization of benefits
Reviewing and agreeing on project business prioritisation and RAG status using
frameworks for guidance (Section 5.)
Programme and Project Management (PMO) Policy/March 2016
Page 5 of 15
Providing decision-making for the strategic goals that projects may be
contributing to
Providing support to the Project Owner
Providing guidance on required action for projects in exception
(approval/rejection of project exception plans)
Hold Project Owners and Project Managers accountable for project delivery and
compliance with the PMO policy
4.4 Deputy Chief Executive/Director of Finance Responsibilities:
The Executive Lead accountable for this policy and responsible for embedding it within the
Trust. The PMO and the Head of Programme Management report to the Deputy Chief
Executive/Director of Finance.
All staff involved in projects are expected to comply with the project governance and
management principles and procedures as outlined in this policy in Section 5.
5. Programme and Project Processes The PMO has established a number of systems, processes and standardized documentation for the effective management and reporting of the Trust’s projects. Section 5 details the definitions, governance, principles and processes that all project management teams within the organization must follow for effective project management.
5.1 Project Definition
What is a Project?
A project carries out work to achieve a clear objective, usually to bring about change. It is a temporary and one-time endeavor undertaken to create a unique product or service, which brings about beneficial change or added value. (OGC, 2009) Projects can be distinguished from the everyday business as usual (BAU) activities in three main ways:
Projects are the means by which changes are introduced into the organisation
A project is temporary with a defined start and end date
Projects often bring together people with different skills from different
departments and even different organisations; the project environment is often
cross-functional in nature
A project:
Has a defined start and finish
Needs people and resources for a specific time
Focuses on a single or a few objectives
Brings specific change to an organisation
Brings benefit to an organisation, usually on completion
Programme and Project Management (PMO) Policy/March 2016
Page 6 of 15
Must have changes managed as exceptional events
Can have sub-projects that are related to the project outcome and to each other
Can be applied at any level of an organisation
A project is usually deemed to be a success if it achieves the objectives within an
agreed timescale and budget
Tender Bids and Implementations
All tender submissions will not be counted as projects within the PMO until a notification that
the bid has been successful.
At the point of implementation, implementation teams will produce and share a full
implementation plan that will be shared with the PMO and this will include the need for
resources and elements of the implementations that need to be addressed through the PMO
process e.g. IM&T and F&E.
Sources of Projects
Annex 1 provides a visual representation of the sources of the Trust’s projects and the
associated project reporting and assurance. Typically, projects originate from (but are not
limited to) Trust Strategic Aims, Business Plans, Quality Improvement Plans, Risk mitigation
plans and Cost Improvement Programmes inform the need for new project creation.
5.2 Programme Definition
What is a Programme?
A programme is a set of related projects and activities that deliver benefits to the organisation’s strategic objectives. A programme is likely to have a lifespan of several years.” (The Cabinet Office, 2011) A programme is made up of a specific set of related projects identified by an organisation that together will deliver a defined objective, or set of objectives, for the organisation. The objectives, or goals, of the programme are typically at a strategic level so that the organisation can achieve benefits and improvements in its business operations. A programme:
Aligns with the organisation’s overall strategy
Delivers benefits incrementally throughout its life
Has a number of projects under it that are related to the overall strategy but may not be related to each other
Has long term timescales
Brings wide ranging change to an organisation
5.3 Programme and Project Governance
Programme and project governance is the framework that ensures that the programme or project has been correctly conceived and is being executed in accordance
Programme and Project Management (PMO) Policy/March 2016
Page 7 of 15
with best project management practice and within the wider framework of the Trusts governance processes. An effective programme and project governance framework is comparable to the governance framework used for BAU. It is about ensuring that resources are allocated to the highest priority projects which are managed to ensure they deliver the value expected of them. An appropriate governance framework helps save money by ensuring that all expenditure is appropriate for the risks being tackled, and that project issues are identified early and managed correctly in line with strategic objectives. Programme and project governance is not about micro-management; rather it is about setting the terms of reference and management framework, defining the boundaries and ensuring that planning and execution are carried out in a way that ensures that the project delivers benefits. Annex 1 provides the Trust’s Programme Governance Structure, articulating the reporting and assurance pathways for the Trust’s projects. 5.3.1 Implementation Governance Implementations have a parallel governance process. All tenders are signed off by the Director of Business Development and the Director of Finance prior to submission. These decisions are ratified by BDIC and separate governance paperwork exists for this process. Progress on implementations is monitored through two board committees (BDIC and QGC) and separate updates are delivered at TMT on a fortnightly basis. 5.3.2 Project Prioritisation The projects within the SSSFT Programme need to be prioritised so that relevant
stakeholders, meetings and boards are able to monitor their progress. It also allows the
PMO to highlight resource pressures and project interdependencies in line with the aims and
objectives of the organisation.
Below is a framework to be used by the PMO to prioritise each project and to provide
guidance on the corresponding level of project controls required to manage the project
effectively. Project priorities will be discussed and reviewed by TMT. The framework is used
for guidance only, exceptions for project priority can be applied in agreement with TMT e.g. a
project risk rated 16 or above could be mutually agreed and notified to the PMO to be
prioritised as Medium with reference to other Trust priorities at the time.
Business Critical is the highest priority level of project. The project priority informs the level
of supporting documentation required and the necessary reporting. For example, a business
critical project will require a higher level of detail in its supporting project documentation and
more detailed project plans to provide sufficient assurance because of its importance to the
Trust.
Changes to the priority of a project should be infrequent.
Business Priority
Factor Low Medium High Business Critical
Patient Safety No incident response/no anticipated
improvement to patient safety
Responding to an incident/anticipated
improvement to patient safety
Responding to multiple incidents/Significant
anticipated improvement to patient safety
Patient Experience/Service Improvement No anticipated improvement.
Minor anticipated improvement.
Significant improvements to services/patient
experience.
Delivery of mandatory standards (E.g. CQC
outcomes)
Cost Saving (CIP) Predicted Saving
Under £10K Predicted Saving Exceeding £10k
Predicted Saving Exceeding £50k
Predicted Saving Exceeding £250k
Risk Not on Risk Register 15 and below
16 and above.
Or significant, long-lasting damage to organisational reputation if risk occurs.
Contract Compliance/Complexity No Breach or minor contract changes
Single breach or significant contract
changes
Multiple breaches or multiple contracts with
new suppliers
Trust Strategic Aims (PRIDE)
No alignment or minor contribution to other work that is linked to a strategic
outcome. Direct contribution to a
strategic outcome.
Direct contribution to more than one strategic
outcome.
5.3.3 Document Complexity Matrix The project priority will determine the level of supporting documentation required to ensure
that the project is effectively managed. It is the responsibility of project managers to ensure
that projects are supported with the requisite documentation and Trust standards according
to their priority.
Documentation Project Priority
Low Medium High Business
Critical
Implemen
tations
Project
Mandate
All sections
Project
Brief
1. Contents
Completed by PMO 2. Instructions for Completion
3. Purpose
4. Document Benefits
5. Authority Responsible
6. Background
7. Project Objectives
8. Scope
9. Interfaces D
10. Quality Expectations D D
11. Outline Business Case D
12. Risks and Assumptions D
13. Project Governance
14. Communications Management Strategy
D D
15. Configuration Management D
16. Associated Documents and Supporting Information
D D D D
17. Project Closure/Post Project Evaluation
18. Equality Impact Analysis
19. Quality Impact Assessment D D D D
20. Privacy Impact Assessment D D D D
Programme and Project Management (PMO) Policy/March 2016
Page 10 of 15
Project
Plan
Outline Project Plan
MS Project Plan
Detailed MS Project Plan (critical path, milestones, dependencies)
Activity
Reporting
SSSFT PMO Project Register
PMO Site D D
Highlight Report
Safeguard Risk Register
Project
Closure
Project Closure Report D D
Lessons Learned Event D D
Tender
Impleme
ntations
Financial Risk Assessment T Form Tender Submission
D = discretionary. The project manager or project owner may decide to complete this
documentation if they wish.
5.3.4 Project Reporting (RAG Status) The Project RAG Status is agreed between the Project Manager and the PMO and reflects how a project is currently performing. This will be
used by the PMO to flag any issues to TMT that may be arising or currently being experienced.
Changes to the RAG status of a project may be frequent.
RAG STATUS
The following guide is used to determine the RAG status of a project during its delivery. Time Scope Cost Risk
RED Project is confirmed as
behind schedule.
Project failing to deliver objectives and
deliverables within scope as planned.
Project becomes a priority for review by
TMT when it is forecast to not realise the anticipated CIP.
Predicted overspend of
more than 25% of established project
budget. Project has identified risks which may affect
ability for successful completion.
AMBER
Project is forecast to go behind schedule at
a future date.
Delivering majority of objectives and
deliverables within scope as planned.
Some areas of project scope delivery are
cause for concern and need reviewing.
Predicted overspend of <25% Risks present with mitigation plans in action.
GREEN On Schedule.
Delivering all objectives and
deliverables within scope as planned.
Within budget.
Planned CIP on target. All risks successfully managed.
5.4 Programme and Project Principles
The following principles must be adhered to when running programmes and projects, although Implementations sit outside the PMO process, they would be expected to follow these principles:
Every programme and project should add value to the service/organisation
and be consistent with Trust strategic objectives. If during a programme or project it becomes clear that there is reduced or no value or return on investment (business justification), then the programme or project should be stopped
Programme and project objectives and benefits must be clearly defined, measurable and achievable at the beginning of a programme or project and then tracked for delivery through the PMO
Programme and project governance and management should be tailored to the complexity and environment of the programme or project within set parameters. The level of detail needed at the various programme or project stages should remain appropriate for the size and complexity of the project in agreement with the Project Owner, TMT and the PMO
Programmes and projects should encourage innovation and allow an acceptable level of risk taking and failure
Key stakeholders (e.g. service users, customers, IM&T, Safety and Risk,
Health and Safety, Estates etc) must be involved at programme and project
initiation and throughout
Roles and responsibilities for all involved in the programme or project need to be clearly documented in the Project Brief
Management should be by exception, to avoid unnecessary micro-management
Lessons learned during a programme or project must be captured and shared with the PMO to ensure errors are not repeated and best practice is adopted
Programmes and projects should be broken into Milestone stages for review and
ease of tracking. Milestones enable a decision about whether to proceed to
the next of a programme or project made between the stages to support the
management of risk
It is important to understand what the constraints of any programme or project are in order to clearly define the boundaries in which programme or project work must be done. Typical constraints are funding, the scope of the programme or project, available resources and time. These are to be documented by project managers in the Project Brief
Projects should have a definite start and finish point within which their objectives need to be fulfilled
Change in project scope must be controlled and documented or benefits may be better served by starting a new project, rather than risking the agreed benefits
Trust values should be complied with, for instance, it is important to be honest and open about issues and risks
Interdependencies with other projects should be identified (documented in the
Project Brief) and managed
Project objectives and benefits should be sustained after transition to BAU
All projects should have their success metrics agreed during the Start-up phase and these should be continually monitored. They should include standard metrics such as achievement to time, cost, scope and benefits delivery, which support a continuous improvement approach to project management across the Trust
All project closures should have be reviewed against the original aims/objectives and benefits to evaluate its effectiveness
Programme and Project Management (PMO) Policy/March 2016
Page 13 of 15
5.5 Programme and Project Meetings
Programme Board – accountable for the overall delivery of the Programme and for
developing and supporting a long-term strategy to improve service quality, cost and
delivery. Pre-established programme boards exist for all project management teams and are
documented in Annex 1
Project Steering Group – responsible for the direction and implementation of the project
plan, and ensures that:
Issues are resolved appropriately or are escalated to the relevant place Regular reports are produced Effective communication is undertaken Strategies are considered and recommended Review risks, issues and budget
5.6 Project Process
The processes required to be undertaken when a new project is identified can be found in
the Programme Management Office (PMO) Processes Standard Operating Procedure: LINK
(FLOW CHART)
6. Annex 1 - SSSFT Programme Governance
The following diagram shows the origins and progress reporting routes for the Trust’s projects.
7. References
The Cabinet Office (2011) Managing Successful Programmes. (4th Edition). London: The Stationery Office
Office of Government Commerce (2009) Managing successful projects with Prince2. London: The Stationery Office