Corporate Governance in a Group Context
description
Transcript of Corporate Governance in a Group Context
Restricted
Corporate Governance in a Group Context
Regional Seminar on Supervision of Insurance Groups
Santiago, Chile, 19-21 November 2013
Gunilla Löfvendahl Senior Financial Sector Specialist
Restricted 2
ICP 7 Corporate Governance
The supervisor requires insurers to establish and implement a corporate governance framework, which provides for sound and prudent management and oversight of the insurer’s business, and adequately recognises and protects the interests of the policyholders.
Restricted 3
Why is it important?
Exposure to risk Decreases the risk of unexpected losses Create efficiency and value on a micro and macro level
Competitive markets Goals and objectives Reputation – legal entity and group
Inter-linkages Risk of contagion and damage to others’ reputation
Customer claims Confidence in the ability to meet future obligations
Compliance Facilitates compliance with detailed and complex requirements
Supervisory focus on management and governance aspects promote prevention and early detection of problems
Restricted 4
Key notions and functions
Responsibility Accountability Separation of duties and checks and balances Compliance with rules and corporate discipline Management of risk Independence Knowledge Transparency
Boards of directors Senior management Risk management and CRO Internal audit and control Compliance and actuarial functions
Restricted 5
Building-blocks of sound standards and practices
Clear lines of responsibility and accountability
Strategic objectives and corporate values
Quality, awareness, knowledge and independence of board members
Quality and duties of senior management
Transparent and manageable structures
Risk management, internal audit andother internal control functions
Proper compensation policy
Disclosure of information and market discipline
Restricted 6
Clear lines of responsibility and accountability
Define authorities and key responsibilities for board of directors and senior management – create an accountability hierarchy for the staff
Ultimate responsibility stays with the board Different responsibilities often requires different persons
(conflicts of interest and accountability) Good practice to have a separation between the Chair of the
Board and CEO How does the accountability hierarchy work for insurers being
part of a group? What about the responsibilities of the shareholders and the
accountability towards them?
Restricted 7
Available accountability models
Several models of the accountability hierarchy are available but there are two main key functions Overall strategy and oversight Execution and management
One-tier system with board and senior management Two-tier system with Executive and Oversight Board, where
the latter consists of independent members (not employees, owners or other stakeholders)
Committees of the board with different responsibilities (audit, remuneration, compliance, investment, risk management, etc)
Elaborate systems of control can make decision-making more complicated, time consuming and expensive
Could also provide a pseudo-comfort about risk – many risks are uncertain and do not fit easily into control frameworks
Restricted 8
Strategic objectives and corporate values
Well articulated corporate strategy that is implemented Should include risk strategy and appetite in line with
the long term interests and viability Corporate climate that prevents corruption and fraud
(start from the top) Interests of key stakeholders to be safeguarded System to avoid conflicts of interest Controlled lending and other forms of self-dealing,
including related parties and other favoured parties What about lending and other financial support within
the group?
Restricted 9
Quality, awareness, independence and knowledge of board members
Understand oversight role and duty of loyalty (fiduciary duty to policyholders)
Provide objective advice and recommend sound practices Independent – what does that mean in reality? Adequate knowledge and experience relevant to (each of) the
material financial activities – see also ICP 5 Suitability of Persons
Power and structure to question management (information and standing)
Conflict between knowledge and independence? Independence of board members in a subsidiary and
knowledge of those in the parent company?
Restricted 10
Structure and governance of the board
Appropriate number and mix of individuals to ensure an overall adequate level of knowledge and skills that is commensurate to nature scale and complexity
Avoid conflicts of interest (sufficient number of non-executives)
Power and structure to question management (information, size, frequency, standing, evaluation etc)
Appropriate internal practices to support the work of the board to promote efficient and independent judgement and decision-making
Adequate powers and resources to discharge its duties Robust enough to deal with crisis situations Meet regularly with senior management and internal audit Assess own performance and take corrective actions
Restricted 11
How to further improve board practices?
Any ideas?
Restricted 12
Quality and duties of senior management
Carry out day-to-day operations in line with strategies, policies and procedures - necessary knowledge and experience
Oversight duties consistent with board policy - exercise control over key employees
Involved in key decisions (should be made by more than one person)
Not too involved in business-line decisions -policy defining the limits and responsibilities
Promote culture of sound risk management, compliance and fair treatment of customers
Provide timely and relevant information Board Supervisor Relevant stakeholders
Restricted 13
Transparent and manageable structures
Board and senior management should know and understand the operational structure of the company/group, including SPVs and other special arrangements
Also when operating in other jurisdictions - ensure that risks are assessed and managed appropriately and that local rules are followed
Too big to fail? To big to manage? Supervisory tools: impose better structures or add
requirements (capital add-ons, living wills/resolution)
Restricted 14
Proper compensation policy
A system of incentives that rewards excessive risk taking is like paying smart people to do stupid things
Active board involvement in the design and operation of the compensation system – arm’s-length negotiations and decisions
Create the right incentives and being consistent with Ethical values Long-term objectives and strategy of the company (two-sided and
only once the performance has been realised) Prudent risk-taking
Appropriate mix of fixed and variable components, also based on non-financial criteria as appropriate
Established through an explicit governance process with roles and responsibilities clearly defined
Subject to shareholders approval at the annual meeting Also supervisory process?
Restricted 15
ICP 8 Risk Management and Internal Control
The supervisor requires an insurer to have as part of its overall corporate governance framework, effective systems of risk management and internal controls, including effective functions for risk management, compliance, actuarial matters and internal audit
Restricted 16
Risk management
Effective risk management is to ensure that risks are understood, managed and communicated
Risk should be linked to strategy - board has an oversight role Risk managers should be an essential part in the
implementation of the strategy (risk tolerance, appetite etc) Independent risk management function, including CRO or
equivalent, with sufficient authority, stature and resources – ideally reporting directly to board
Implications for companies belonging to a group? Centralised and decentralised structures – outsourcing
and cost-sharing Consistent or individual risk modelling – large exposures Internal reinsurance and other risk transfers
Restricted 17
Internal audit and other internal control systems
Assist the board and senior management in the fulfilment of their respective responsibilities - consistent with strategy and risk appetite
At a minimum provide assurance over Key business and IT Financial polices and procedures (accounting, financial reporting) Risk management and compliance measures in place
Provide expertise, leadership, objectivity and independence (avoid conflicts of interest) Communicate on own initiative with any employee, and have unrestricted access to senior
management as well as business and support areas Remuneration: Head of internal audit set by the board Disciplining and dismissal: Head of a control function approved by the board Performance of the control functions assessed by the board External audit to verify internal controls - board to oversee the process for hiring, removing
and assessing their performance Use findings timely and effectively and correct problems identified by internal/external
auditors Use auditors as independent check of information from management – meet with Chair of
Board and Audit Committee without management present Regular meetings between board and external auditors Direct reporting to the board or Audit Committee
Restricted 18
Compliance function
Assist the insurer in meeting its legal and regulatory obligations and promote and sustain an ethical corporate culture of compliance and integrity
Well positioned, resourced and authorised function – led by Chief Compliance Officer or similar
Identify and address key legal and regulatory obligations Keep senior management informed on developments Educate staff on compliance issues Pro-active identification of compliance risk (new business etc) Report to the board on performance against compliance standards
and goals Ensure that adequate disciplinary actions are taken and relevant
authorities are informed
Restricted 19
Actuarial function
Evaluate and provide advice to the insurer regarding technical provisions, premium and pricing activities, and compliance with related statutory and regulatory requirements
Report to the board on circumstances that may have a material effect from an actuarial perspective (adequacy of technical provisions, prospective solvency position etc)
Evaluate and provide advice on the distribution of policy dividends or other benefits, underwriting policies, reinsurance arrangements, sufficiency and quality of data, and risk modelling in ORSA/use of internal modelling
Appointed actuary providing certified actuarial opinions could be required Should not hold positions within or outside that may create
conflicts of interest Resignation or replacement should be notified to the supervisor
Restricted 20
Supervisory tools and market discipline
Risk- and principles-based supervisory methodology – why? Supervisory assessment of if effective and implemented – company needs to demonstrate
the adequacy and effectiveness – what are the supervisory challenges? Initial and on-going assessment of suitability (licensing, reporting and on-site) On-going assessment of boardroom performance:
Minutes of board: Information provided and discussed Minutes of board committees, where relevant
Quality of audit and control functions – appropriate supervisory skills and resources, including in risk management and actuarial matters
Reports of internal auditors to be discussed with audit staff and staff in affected areas Reports of external auditors
Information from external auditors to supervisors without prior consent of insurers – possibility to require further auditors or replacement of one chosen by an insurer
Follow-up on important changes in companies (eg the CRO is leaving) Effects of group structures and how they are being managed and controlled (management
structure could differ from legal entity structure) Where material deficiencies have been found - require effective and timely remedial action
by the board Examples of more informal tools that could be useful? Disclosure and market discipline
Material risks Governance, including remuneration Risk management and internal control