Corporate Communications Today, Course Module 5: Knowledge Management
description
Transcript of Corporate Communications Today, Course Module 5: Knowledge Management
Corporate Communications Today Course Module 5: Knowledge Management
29.01.2013
Susanne Robra-Bissantz
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 4
Course Modules
CM 1 Social Media
CM 3 „Marketing“
CM 2 Collaboration
CM 4 Innovation
CM 5 Knowledge
CM 6 Web Society
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 5
Collaboration approaches: internal – external?
Collaborative creativity
Innovation Management
Organizational Learning Complaints: ideas and problems
Knowledge Management
Project support
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 6
Knowledge Management - Facts
The ability to apply knowledge in the company and share it with partners correlates positively with the ability to build competitive advantages
(Chew et al. 1990)
The best ideas come through weak ties in a network– „the strength of weak ties“ (Granovetter 1979).
Groups often make better decisions than individuals– „the wisdom of the crowds“ (Surowiecki 2004)
Knowledge can be used by the entire company, if implicit knowledge of the
individual is externalized. (Nonaka,Takeuchi 1997).
Phenomenon of Information Stickiness – Knowledge „sticks“, it is difficult to transfer
(from Hippel 1994).
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 7
And summarized: Collaboration seems to be important for organisations, but, it seems to be difficult. And the reason is the so called „information stickyness“. Organisations know that, and they try to transfer knowledge – from implicit knowledge to explicit knowledge. Implicit knowledge is not externalised and kept by one person. This may be because the person doesn‘t want to explicate it, but also because it is hard (or even impossible) to verbalize or because the person is unconscious about the fact that his knowledge may be important for others. Explicit knowledge is externalised (verbalized), even categorized and connected to other knowledge. Like this it can be adopted by others. They implement Knowledge Management Systems and use Incentives in order to make people share their knowledge. For example „points“ for knowledge pieces you provide.
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 8
implicit knowledge
unconscious
conscious
categorized / networked
not / difficult verbalizable
verbalizable verbalized
explicit knowledge
Information Stickiness KMS, Incentives
Information Stickiness
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 9
Instruments of Knowledge Management
Knowledge Cards
Instruments of Knowledge
Management
Best Practices
Lessons Learned
Yellow Pages
Skill Management
Find a quite good summary on knowledge management and different instruments on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_management.
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 10
In social media, we try and start with the differences between implicit and explicit knowledge, and find out, that in order to transfer knowledge we need: • Occasions for Communication, that may appear in discussions on Blogs, Wikis and
especially with status updates or activity streams,
• Contexts – that may be interpersonal context, people are networked. In this case knowledge doesn‘t have to be explicated, but it is enough to know who knows what. Contexts on electronical platforms – between the contents – can brilliantly achieved via tagging, social tagging and tag clouds, as we introduced them last week.
And: in our second lecture on social Media and Collaboration, you‘ll find functions in information cylce (slide 16), where you‘ll find „occasions for communication“ and „creation of contexts“. By the way: in the introduction of a Knowledge Management System, that has to be used voluntarily and because someone is motivated to to so, the following way has been proven to be successfull: Start with problems and questions that people may post. That is easy. The others will answer. Then let them post good ideas. Only after that finally build a social network, where you expect people to post what ever they know and may find interesting. By then they have probably understood the mechanic of giving and getting knowledge. And they feel good in posting contents to a social media plattform. What is difficult in the beginning...
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 11
implicit knowledge
unconscious
conscious
categorized / networked
not / difficult verbalizable
verbalizable verbalized
Create contexts
explicit knowledge
Blog Wiki Status update
Networking Content Tagging Tagcloud
knowledge of relationships
Networking Person
Information Stickiness KMS, Incentives
Information Stickiness
Create occasions for communication
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 12
Problems / Questions
Response / Solution Discussion
Evaluate Integrate and link Learn
Communication occasion question/problem A good starting point for communication, that may be implemented, are problems. Enable employees to ask their question. Others provide solutions, they may be discussed and evaluated and also linked together. IT enables the system to learn in every step. Find better respondands, discuss and integrate.
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 13
Focus communication occasion: Question- and Responsecards
Occasion for communication: Problem Additional motivation: - Votings - Expert status
Question
Proposed contacts for the question that had answers to the topic earlier.
Answers may be evaluated and rated.
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 14
Focus communication context: Knowledge network Basis: Social Network (Relationships) with • People • Relationships • Projects and all of them connected by • Activities • Tags
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 15
Problems – research questions
1. How do I motivate my employees to contribute knowledge?
2. How do I motivate my employees to augment knowledge together?
Starting points: Contributions: How do they have to be formulated in order to foster answers? Platform: Which features are needed, like status, evaluation....? Environment: What has to happen with the organisational culture – collaboration?!?
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 16
Fun to collaborate – willingness to collaborate
Social closeness Motivation
Interaction Participation
Willingness to collaborate
openness
trust
mutuality
contributions are valuable
fun to contribute
many supporters
shared understanding
ideas grow „big“
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 17
In these self-enforcing cycles: • Motivation is enhanced, because everybody realizes, that his contributions are valuable,
and that then it is fun to contribute. • This enhances interaction and many employees support common knowledge. This again
leads to a mutual understanding, via discussions and tagging. • The mutual understanding makes ideas grow as a result of a wisdom of the crowds – of
participation. And at the same time trust raises – as collaborating works. • With trust a social closeness may grow. You learn that it is worth, being open and a sense
of mutuallity appears. This again rises motivation.
... and concluding: the willingness to collaborate rises. But, as always, before you try and implement an IC-System, think about your goals (pinkish) first.
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 18
• Explicit knowledge is the asset for our organization. Our knowledge and a lot of knowledge from other sources is available – but often we do not find it.
Social Bookmarking
• Together, we know much more than every individual. We are working on a shared knowledge base. Wiki
• It is enough if we know someone who knows something. Anything else is too much work. Skill-Network
• Our knowledge is so difficult to grasp and articulate. Sometimes we only realize what is important in conversations. Social Network
• We want to continue to discuss and develop. Every individual, every new idea is valuable for our company. Idea-Blog
• We work on projects which accumulate regularly and predictably a lot of information for different groups. (Multi)-News-Blog
• Not binding, share something not so important– it also strengthens the social cohesion Twitter
Need more knowledge?
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 19
Collaboration approaches: internal – external?
Collaborative creativity
Innovation Management
Organizational Learning Complaints: ideas and problems
Knowledge Management
Project support
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 20
In a short excursus, let‘s think about „learning“ – like we do it in organizational contexts, e. g. in courses and during knowledge management. Without explicating different possible systems – it is probably self explaining, that today frontal teaching without interaction and following a strict curriculum, like in lectures, doesn‘t fit learners needs. What we need is learning – in order to escape from the uncertainty we are faced with. We even need life-long-learning. But learning as to be connected to the problems we are faced with. Actually about 80% of what we know, doesn‘t come from institutional learning (in school, university and further education). We learn in contexts and, as information behaviour shows it, at information encounters – spaces in which discussion take place, often unplanned. This is even more important for the so called digital natives – that grow up with the internet and that have a completely different access to knowledge. Therefore we need a „modern“ learning – in situations, in collaboration ...
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 21
Demands of the modern "professional" learning
connectivity
self-responsibility
discursive formats
ad hoc, in situations
collaborative
self-controlled
playful?, authentic?
acquiring skills
Needs of learners „Modern“ learning
Knowledge through exchange
Knowledge in situations
Find knowledge
Construct knowledge
Digital Natives
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 22
We have actually learned about learning. Learning theories have changed – and also the functions of media – coloured in red typing in the next slide. The first behavioural approach stresses learning as based on experiences on stimulus-response-relations. Material has to be structured and presented - media can support that in knowledge representation. In cognitive theories, internal cognitive processes are taken into account. The learner doesn‘t learn facts but processes that lead him to problem solving. The focus of media is knowledge transfer and the regulation of learning processes, that enable the learner to build new connections and approaches. In constructivist learning, we presume, that reality is always constructed and may only be learned in situations, where the learner is introduced in social or real contexts and works on problem solving himself and together with other learners and teachers. Media support this, when they provide knowledge tools – actually like our knowledge management systems. But still – in todays information behaviour, Kerres sees problems in media supported learning in embedding knowledge in authentic situations and social contexts. Social media may be a solution for social contexts and collaborating on solutions. Additionally we are able to identify context – automatically: we are able to identify surroundings and even emotions...
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 23
Media in modern learning
„With its emphasis on social interaction in authentic contexts it seems that
especially media-based learning is questionable.“
(Kerres, M.: Multimediale und telemediale Lernumgebungen, München et al. 2001, S. 82)
Behaviourist approach
Cognitive theories
Constructivist theories
Theories of information behavior
Knowledge presentation: Presentation and organization of knowledge
Knowledge transfer: Control and regulation of the learning process
Knowledge tool: Communication and construction of knowledge
(Kerres, M.: Multimediale und telemediale Lernumgebungen, München et al. 2001, S. 95 ff.)
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 24
Technologies
„With its emphasis on social interaction in authentic contexts it seems that
especially media-based learning is questionable.“
(Kerres, M.: Multimediale und telemediale Lernumgebungen, München et al. 2001, S. 82)
Social Media: - Facebook, Wikis, Twitter - Networking of people - Creation of platforms
(Spaces)
contextualising: - Identification of contexts - Reaction to contexts
WS 2012/13 | Prof. Dr. Susanne Robra-Bissantz | Corporate Communications Today| Seite 25
Examples: Web 2.0 in teaching
Twitter-Lecture • Mass lecture • Individual adaptation • Discussion, own contributions • Continuation online Video-Discussion
• Advanced level • Youtube thesis videos • Collaboration • Ongoing discussion - public
Wiki-Seminar • Smaller groups • Learning by teaching • Collaboration • Responsibility