Coronary syndromes

48
Coronary syndromes Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, MD Sapienza University of Rome, Italy [email protected]

description

Coronary syndromes. Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai , MD Sapienza University of Rome , Italy [email protected]. Learning goals. Preamble Definitions Impact Approach Management. Learning goals. Preamble Definitions Impact Approach Management. Time machine. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Coronary syndromes

Page 1: Coronary syndromes

Coronary syndromesGiuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, MD

Sapienza University of Rome, [email protected]

Page 2: Coronary syndromes

Learning goals

• Preamble• Definitions• Impact• Approach• Management

Page 3: Coronary syndromes

Learning goals

• Preamble• Definitions• Impact• Approach• Management

Page 4: Coronary syndromes

Time machine

Teixera et al, Int J Cardiol 2013

Page 5: Coronary syndromes

Myocardial infarction in the 60’s

Page 6: Coronary syndromes

Myocardial infarction today

Page 7: Coronary syndromes

Learning goals

• Preamble• Definitions• Impact• Approach• Management

Page 8: Coronary syndromes

Differential diagnosis of coronary syndromes

• Asymptomatic CAD• Chronic stable angina• Unstable angina• Acute myocardial infarction

In addition:• Ischemic cardiomyopathy• Sudden ischemic cardiac death• Myocardial ischemia due to spasm or mismatch

Wijns et al, Eur Heart J 2010

Page 9: Coronary syndromes

From diagnosis to risk stratification

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acute_coronary_syndrome

Page 10: Coronary syndromes

Third universal definition of myocardial infarction

• Detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarker values [preferably cardiac troponin (cTn)] with at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) and with at least one of the following:– Symptoms of ischemia.– New or presumed new significant ST-segment–T wave (ST–T)

changes or new left bundle branch block (LBBB).– Development of pathological Q waves in the ECG.– Imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new

regional wall motion abnormality.– Identification of an intracoronary thrombus by angiography or

autopsy.

Thygesen et al, Eur Heart J 2012

Page 11: Coronary syndromes

Third universal definition of myocardial infarction: subtypes

Thygesen et al, Eur Heart J 2012

Page 12: Coronary syndromes

Third universal definition of myocardial infarction: subtypes

• 1 - Spontaneous MI: related to plaque rupture, ulceration, fissuring, erosion, or dissection with resulting intraluminal thrombus in one or more of the coronary arteries leading to decreased myocardial blood flow or distal platelet emboli with ensuing myocyte necrosis.

• 2 - Secondary MI: In instances of myocardial injury with necrosis where a condition other than CAD contributes to an imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and/or demand, e.g. spasm, anemia, etc.

• 3 - Fatal MI: Cardiac death with symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischaemia and presumed new ischaemic ECG changes or new LBBB.

Thygesen et al, Eur Heart J 2012

Page 13: Coronary syndromes

Third universal definition of myocardial infarction: subtypes

• 4a – Related to PCI: >5 x 99th percentile URL in patients with normal baseline values (>99th percentile URL) or a rise of cTn values >20% if the baseline values are elevated and are stable or falling. In addition, symptoms, new ischemic ECG changes, angiographic loss of patency, or imaging demonstration of MI.

• 4b – Related to stent thrombosis: angiography or autopsy evidence and cardiac biomarkers values with at least one value above the 99th percentile URL.

• 5 – Related to CABG: cardiac biomarker values >10 x 99th percentile URL. In addition, new pathological Q waves or new LBBB, or angiographic documented new graft or new native coronary artery occlusion, or imaging evidence of MI.

Thygesen et al, Eur Heart J 2012

Page 14: Coronary syndromes

Learning goals

• Preamble• Definitions• Impact• Approach• Management

Page 15: Coronary syndromes

Stable CAD in diabetics

Farkouh et al, New Engl J Med 2012

Page 16: Coronary syndromes

Stable CAD

Farkouh et al, New Engl J Med 2012

MAC

CE (%

)

Page 17: Coronary syndromes

Stable CAD in diabetics

Farkouh et al, New Engl J Med 2012

Page 18: Coronary syndromes

Medically managed ACS

Roe et al, New Engl J Med 2012

Page 19: Coronary syndromes

Invasively managed ACS

Wallentin et al, New Engl J Med 2009

Card

iova

scua

lr de

ath,

M

I, or

stro

ke (

%)

Page 20: Coronary syndromes

STEMI

Montalescot et al, Lancet 2012

Card

iova

scua

lr de

ath,

M

I, or

stro

ke (

%)

Page 21: Coronary syndromes

Learning goals

• Preamble• Definitions• Impact• Approach• Management

Page 22: Coronary syndromes

High-sensitivity troponins

Thygesen et al, Eur Heart J 2012

Page 23: Coronary syndromes

Ischemic scores

Discrimination (c statistic)

D’Ascenzo et al, Contemp Clin Trials 2012

Page 24: Coronary syndromes

Bleeding scores

www.crusadebleedingscore.com

Page 25: Coronary syndromes

SYNTAX score

www.syntaxscore.com

Page 26: Coronary syndromes

SYNTAX score

www.syntaxscore.com

Page 27: Coronary syndromes

SYNTAX score

Farooq et al, Lancet 2013

Page 28: Coronary syndromes

Learning goals

• Preamble• Definitions• Impact• Approach• Management

Page 29: Coronary syndromes

Radial access

Romagnoli et al, J Am Coll Cardiol 2012

Page 30: Coronary syndromes

Prehospital thrombolysisDe

ath,

shoc

k, C

HF, o

r rei

nfar

ction

(%)

Armstrong et al, New Engl J Med 2013

Page 31: Coronary syndromes

Bivalirudin

NAC

E (%

)M

ACE

(%)

Kastrati et al, New Engl J Med 2008

Page 32: Coronary syndromes

Prasugrel

Wiviott et al, New Engl J Med 2008

Cardiovascular death, MI or stroke

Non-CABG-related TIMI major bleeding

Page 33: Coronary syndromes

TicagrelorVascular death, MI or stroke Major bleeding

Months Months

Wallentin et al, New Engl J Med 2009

Page 34: Coronary syndromes

Adjusted indirect comparison

Biondi-Zoccai et al, Int J Cardiol 2011

Page 35: Coronary syndromes

CangrelorSt

ent t

hrom

bosis

(%)

Bhatt et al, New Engl J Med 2013 (57% CSA, 25% NSTEACS, 18% STEMI)

Page 36: Coronary syndromes

Rivaroxaban

Mega et al, New Engl J Med 2012

Page 37: Coronary syndromes

Beta-blockers

Bangalore et al, JAMA 2012

Card

iova

scul

ar d

eath

, M

I or s

trok

e (%

)

Page 38: Coronary syndromes

Statins

Patti et al, Circulation 2011

Page 39: Coronary syndromes

Fractional flow reserve

De Bruyne et al, New Engl J Med 2012

Page 40: Coronary syndromes

CABG or PCI?

Mohr et al, Lancet 2013

Page 41: Coronary syndromes

Off-pump vs on-pump CABG

Palmerini et al, J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; Palmerini et al, Am Heart J 2013

Page 42: Coronary syndromes

Drug-eluting stents

Palmerini et al, Lancet 2012

Page 43: Coronary syndromes

Drug-eluting stents

Palmerini et al, Lancet 2012

Page 44: Coronary syndromes

Drug-eluting balloons

Byrne et al, Lancet 2013

Page 45: Coronary syndromes

Bioresorbable stents

Palmerini et al, Lancet 2012

Page 46: Coronary syndromes

Bioresorbable stents

Serruys et al, Lancet 2009

Page 47: Coronary syndromes

Take home messages• Developments in the field of coronary syndromes

represent an outstanding example of the successful combination of pathophysiologic, diagnostic, prognostic, pharmacologic and device research.

• Despite the dramatic prognostic improvement, several issues remain unsettled.

• In addition, the worsening plethora of management options will make the treatment of individual patients more and more complex, unless risk-beneficial and cost-beneficial tailoring tools are developed.

Page 48: Coronary syndromes

Many thanks for your attention

For these slides and further ones on similar topics feel free to visit:

www.metcardio.org/slides.html

For additional details or queries feel free to contact me directly:

[email protected]