Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

43
1 Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution Jie Zhang George Mason University August 3, 2006 Sci. & Tech. Univ. China Hefei

description

August 3, 2006 Sci. & Tech. Univ. China Hefei. Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution. Jie Zhang George Mason University. Outline. Space Weather Program at GMU Overview of Space Weather CMEs: kinematic evolution CMEs, Flares and Magnetic Reconnection Discussion. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Page 1: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

1

Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Jie Zhang

George Mason University

August 3, 2006 Sci. & Tech. Univ. China Hefei

Page 2: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

2

Outline

1. Space Weather Program at GMU

2. Overview of Space Weather

3. CMEs: kinematic evolution

4. CMEs, Flares and Magnetic Reconnection

5. Discussion

Page 3: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Space Weather Program at GMUSpace Weather Program at GMUSpace Weather Program at GMUSpace Weather Program at GMU

1. George Mason University: 30,000 students, the largest in Virginia

2. Suburb of Washington D.C., close to NASA/GSFC, NRL, APL, UMD

GMU

CapitalHill GSFC

APL

NRL

Page 4: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Space Weather Program at GMUSpace Weather Program at GMUSpace Weather Program at GMUSpace Weather Program at GMU

•Strategy: a system approach to address the integrated Sun-Earth connected system, and heliospher at large.

•Initiated in 2003

•Faculty– Dr. Ken Dere (Sun) – Dr. Bob Meier (Ionosphere)– Dr. Merav Ophere (Heliosphere, Sun)– Dr. Art Poland (Sun)– Dr. Bob Weigel (Magnetosphere)– Dr. Jie Zhang (Sun, Heliosphere)– Postdoctoral and Graduate Students

Page 5: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Research HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch Highlights

•Sun-Earth Connection: CME, ICME and Geomagnetic Storms (Jie Zhang)

•CME Initiation and Acceleration (Jie Zhang)

•SEEDS (Solar Eruptive Event Detection System) (Jie Zhang)

Page 6: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Research HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch Highlights

•Heliospheric Modeling (Merav Opher)

•ICME and Shock propagation Modeling (Merav Opher)

Page 7: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Research HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch Highlights

•Coronal heating -- Art Poland– Measurements from SOHO data– Modeling

Page 8: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Research HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch Highlights

•CHIANTI database (Ken Dere)

•CME

Page 9: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Research HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch Highlights

•ViRBO (Virtual Radiation Belt Observatory) (Bob Weigel)

•CISM-DX

•TSDS

Page 10: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Research HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch HighlightsResearch Highlights

•Ionosphere and Thermosphere (Bob Meier)– I-T system responds to solar &

geomagnetic forcing– Develop methods to image the global

system– Improve empirical and first principles

models

Page 11: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Space Weather: the EffectsSpace Weather: the EffectsSpace Weather: the EffectsSpace Weather: the Effects

Human Space Exploration

Satellite Operation

Imagination Communication and Navigation

Aviation

Power

Page 12: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Space Weather: Physical SystemsSpace Weather: Physical SystemsSpace Weather: Physical SystemsSpace Weather: Physical Systems

Page 13: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Space Weather: the ConnectionSpace Weather: the ConnectionSpace Weather: the ConnectionSpace Weather: the Connection

Courtesy of Odstrcil

Courtesy of Manchester

Page 14: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Space Weather: the DriverSpace Weather: the DriverSpace Weather: the DriverSpace Weather: the Driver

Eruptions caused by magnetic activities

Credit: NASA

Page 15: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

Coronal Mass Ejections: Coronal Mass Ejections:

Kinematic EvolutionKinematic Evolution

Page 16: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

16

Tracking Evolution

EIT: disk to 1.5 Rs

C1: 1.1 to 3.0 Rs

C2: 2.0 to 6.0 Rs

C3: 4.0 to 30 Rs

Page 17: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

17

Evolution: Outer Corona

Outer corona, ~ constant speed e.g., > 2 Rsun by LASCO C2/C3

Time

Hei

gh

t

Time

Vel

oci

ty

Page 18: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

18

Evolution: Inner Corona

Inner corona: fast acceleration e.g., < 2 Rs by LASCO C1 or MK4

Time

Hei

gh

t

Time

Vel

oci

ty

Page 19: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

19

Example: 1998 June 11 event

C1: 15 imagesC2: 3 imagesC3: 8 imagesGOES X-ray Flare: C1.1

(Zhang Jie et al., 2001, 2004)

Page 20: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

20

Example: 1997 Sep. 20 event

C1: 8 imagesC2: 3 images C2.3 flareC3: 7 image

Page 21: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

21

Example: 1996 Oct. 05 event

C1: 3 imagesC2: 3 images Flare: Not in NOAA catalog; A1.2 C3: 7 image

Page 22: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

22

Time

CM

E V

elo

city

Fla

re S

oft

X-r

ay

Flu

x

CME Flare (Soft X-ray) Phase 1 ---- Initiation Phase ---- Pre-flare Phase Phase 2 ---- Acceleration Phase ---- Rise Phase Phase 3 ---- Propagation Phase ---- Decay Phase

Phase 1

Onset 1 Onset 2

Peak

Phase 2 Phase 3

Complete Kinematic Evolution

Zhang et al. 2001Zhang et al. 2004

Gallagher et al. 2003Qiu et al. 2004

Kundu et al. 2004Sterling & Moor 2005

Page 23: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

23

Statistical Study: Accelerations

Main

Acceleration

Residual Acceleration

Inner Corona Outer Corona

Strong Almost zero

Zhang Jie et al. 2006 (ApJ Oct. Issue)

Page 24: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

24

Event Selection

• We have systematically examined all LASCO C1 images, about 100,000 images in total from 1996 January to 1998 June

• Online event catalog at http://solar.scs.gmu.edu/research/cme_c1/index.html

• 50 events in this study, showing evolution in both inner and outer corona

• Calculating main acceleration:• Direct method• Indirect method: using flare rise time as proxy of

CME main acceleration time

Page 25: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

25

Source Regions

All close to the limb

Page 26: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

26

Main and Residual Acceleration Distribution

Page 27: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

27

Main and Residual Acceleration Distribution

Main

(m/s2)

Residual

(m/s2)

median 170.01 3.1

average 330.9 0.9

St. dev. 664.8 25.4

minimum 2.8 -131

maximum 4464.9 52.0

Main

Residual

Page 28: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

28

Duration of Main Acceleration

Duration

(min)

median 54.0

average 180.0

St. dev. 285.9

minimum 6.0

maximum 1200.0

Page 29: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

29

Inverse Correlation Between Magnitude and Duration

A = 10000 X T-1

(m/s2) (min)

The fitting line corresponds to the equal velocity of 600 km/s

Duration

Ma

gn

itu

de

Page 30: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

30

Discussion: 1

• CME main acceleration in the inner corona has a broad distribution, from several m/s2 to several thousand m/s2, with a median value at 170 m/s2.

•Continuous distribution of CME acceleration and velocity, which does not support the idea of two distinct classes of CMEs

•Description of two classes is only a convenience to refer to different events (Sheeley et al. 1999, Andrew & Howard 2000, Moon et al. 2002, Zhang Mei et al. 2002)

Page 31: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

CME, Flare and Magnetic Reconnection

1996 to 2005

CME: 10507

Flare: 21347

X-class: 122 M-class: 1418C-class: 12922B-class: 6872A-class: 7

•Most CMEs (~90%) are accompanied by flares

•Except extremely gradual CMEs

•75% flares are confined, not associated with CMEs

• 5% X-class• 40% M-class (Andrews 2004)

Page 32: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

32

CME, Flare and Magnetic Reconnection

•Flares are believed to be caused by magnetic reconnection

•Almost all impulsive CMEs are associated with flare

•What is the role of magnetic reconnection in CME:

• acceleration phase ? and• initiation phase ?

Page 33: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

33

•In CME initiation phase, there is no X-ray flare, or very weak enhancement at best

•Magnetic reconnection plays an insignificant role in this phase, if any.

Magnetic Reconnection

Page 34: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

34

•In acceleration phase, magnetic reconnection plays an active role.

•The temporal coincidence, between CME acceleration and flare energy release, suggests an active role

•The reconnection is not merely the consequence of the catastrophic loss of equilibrium of large scale eruption of coronal magnetic field

Magnetic Reconnection

Page 35: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

35(Gallagher et al 2003)

•The acceleration of CME-associated TRACE EUV ejector also coincides with the GOES X-ray flare rise phase.

Magnetic Reconnection

Page 36: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

36

(Qiu et al 2004)

•CME-associated filament acceleration, two-ribbon separation also temporally correlate with the flare main phase

Magnetic Reconnection

Page 37: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

37 (Harrison 1986)

CME-flare spatial relation

•There were strong arguments against that flare-reconnection drives CME, based on

•Temporal disparity (proven wrong due to inappropriate linear extrapolation)

•Spatial disparity, flare not underneath the center of CME span

Page 38: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

38

CME-flare spatial relation

•The asymmetric super-expansion of CME in the inner corona explains the spatial disparity in the outer corona

Page 39: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

39

Role of Magnetic Reconnection

•In 2-D flux rope model, serves as tether cutting, allowing flux rope to escape

(Lin et al. 2004)

Page 40: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

40

Role of Magnetic Reconnection

•In 3-D flux rope model, serves as poloidal flux injection, increasing self-Lorentz force (“hoop” force, and gradient force), and expulsing the flux. (Note, Chen & Krall model flux injection from sub-photosphere).

Chen & Krall 2003

Page 41: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

41

Role of Magnetic Reconnection

•In break-out simulation•Breakout reconnection at the top removes the overlying field•Flare reconnection underneath forms the closed flux rope

(Lynch et al. 2004)

Page 42: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

42

A Conceptual ProcessPhase of Energy Building-Up

And closing to critical point of instability

CME Initiation Phase

Flare-producing magnetic reconnection

CME Main Acceleration

Strengthening current sheetDriving magnetic inflow

CME Propagation Phase

Days, weeks

Tens of minutes,

Hours

minutes,Tens of minutes

days to affect the

Earth

Page 43: Coronal Mass Ejections: Kinematic Evolution

43

Conclusion & Discussion•Broad and continuous distribution of CME acceleration

•A scaling law of CME acceleration: inverse linear correlation between acceleration and magntiude

•CME initiation is due to catastrophic loss of equilibrium; possible start of breakout reconnection

•CME fast acceleration is due to the flare-related magnetic reconnection

•What triggers the initiation? Accumulation of helicity? (Zhang Mei et al. 2006)

•Why most flares are confined?