Core Path Report for C488 Dunloskin Wood, Dunoon Dunloskin Wo… · affected with core path C325...
Transcript of Core Path Report for C488 Dunloskin Wood, Dunoon Dunloskin Wo… · affected with core path C325...
Page 1 of 6
Core Path Report for C488
Dunloskin Wood, Dunoon
1. Proposed Core Path
Page 2 of 6
2. Summary of Representations Received Representation Respondent
Name Organisation/ Group
Objection Summery
Respondents proposed action
Respondent Ref No.
Objection withdrawn
Objection S. B. Tong UPM Tilhill Health & Safety / Condition / Alternative Route Available
Delete P018/2
Objection C R Chisholm
Health & Safety / Condition / Alternative Route Available
Delete P058
3. History of Access
i. Right of Way Status: none
ii. Recorded Access Issues: none
4. Site Visit
Photographs of the path and surroundings with comments
Junction with C211
Looking South along C488
C488 heading North
C325 from Ardnadam crosses C488
Page 3 of 6
Heading East towards Main Road
C488 at Heronlea Entrance
Heading East towards Main Road
End of C488 and Heronlea driveway
5. Alternative Route/s
none
6. Consultation with Objectors & Other Interested Parties
This is a Timber Haul route that does not have adequate parking at entrance. The proposal also
passes too close to private house Heronlea. There is adequate access provision into the
woodland from the Ardnadam Heritage trail this also has a dedicated car park.
The route is a Timber Haul Route, if it was prompted as a core path this would direct members
of the public into the path of heavy timber vehicles.
7. Access Officer’s Initial Comments
Propose to show the core path link between C211(a) in the south and C325 in north and delete
the section of C488 that runs between C325 and C225, this is the section of the proposal that
passes the property Heronlea at a distance of 200 metres.
If this link is removed the connectivity of the proposed network at this location will be severely
affected with core path C325 terminating on the forestry road. In all likelihood the forestry road
will be used as a continuation of the proposed core paths adjoining it. As a result if a preferred
route is not promoted there is the possibility that people may use the section of track that
passes Heronlea. Promoting a route that does not pass Heronlea will help to guide people away
from the house and therefore reduce the possibility of people using the track that does pass the
house.
Page 4 of 6
Forest Roads: Access rights need to be exercised responsibly regardless of whether on a core
path or other land, a key aspect of responsible access is to respect the interests of other
people. Users of core paths are required to show due care and respect for all other users of the
route and in this case this will include both non-motorised access takers as well as drivers of
authorised vehicles. Signage could be used to raise awareness that the route is part of a
Timber Haul Route and that there is a greater chance a vehicle may be encountered on this
route.
A lot of forest roads are popular for recreational activities and drivers of vehicles on any forest
road, regardless of whether it is a core path or not should be aware of the potential for
encountering recreational users on the forest road. By designating the route as a core path
vehicle drivers will be more alert to this possibility. As stated above if this proposal is removed
it will result in core path C325 terminating on the forestry road. In all likelihood the forestry road
will be used as a continuation of the proposed core paths adjoining it.
Car parking provision is not a requirement for a core path, and there is no evidence to
substantiate a claim that core paths will create a car parking problem.
Section in black proposed
for deletion
Section of C488 seeking to retain as
this links with C325 and C211(a)
Page 5 of 6
8. Advice received from the Access Forum
9. Access Officer’s Final Recommendations
10. Appendices
Appendix I. Copies of the representations received during the formal consultation
Page 6 of 6
Appendix II. Copies of relevant correspondence
Appendix III. Copies of responses additional consultations
Appendix IV. Additional supporting documents