Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

42
CORE LwDT facilitators – Auckland, Jan 2014 Modern Professional Learning

description

Slides used for my facilitation of the PD day with CORE's LwDT day on 14 January

Transcript of Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

Page 1: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

CORE LwDT facilitators – Auckland, Jan 2014

Modern Professional

Learning

Page 2: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14
Page 3: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

FOCUS

•  Today is about CORE’s provision of professional learning services. We’ll be exploring… •  What is the CORE way? What models and frameworks do we

promote and use? What makes our approach different and more effective than other providers?

•  What facilitation strategies and approaches are required to work effectively with schools and teachers into the future?

•  Where does the work of the LwDT team fit within the wider services of CORE – now and into the future? How can we leverage the considerable expertise across the company?

•  Where do modern learning environments fit into our thinking and way of doing things – in 2014, 2015…

Page 4: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

GROUP ACTIVITY

Introduce yourself with a statement about you as a teacher – what

would your students most remember

about being in your class?

Page 5: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

GREAT TEACHERS…

Page 6: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

ACTIVITY ONE

Page 7: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

CHANGING SCHOOLS…

“Schools may be the starkest example in modern society of an entire institution modelled after the assembly line. This has dramatically increased educational capability in our time, but it has also created many of the most intractable problems with which students, teachers and parents struggle to this day.

If we want to change schools, it is unlikely to happen until we understand more deeply the core assumptions on which the industrial-age school is based”

Peter Senge

Page 8: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

TESTING ASSUMPTIONS…

1996, Prof. Hedley Beare

egg crate classrooms set class groups based on age

period-based timetable linear curriculum

division of all human knowledge into “subjects”

division of staff by “subject”

allocation of most school tasks to teachers

assumption that learning is geographically bound

notion of stand-alone school

limiting ‘formal schooling’ to years 0-13

9-3 school day

Page 9: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

SO…

•  Form a group of 4-5 people •  Choose one of the assumptions identified by Beare •  Brainstorm together the things you know about what

happens currently •  Share some of the assumptions you think lie behind the

way these things are done/organised currently •  Be ready to report back a brief summary of the 2-3 key

ideas that emerged from your discussion.

Page 10: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

MENTAL MODELS

Mental models are the assumptions & stories which we carry in our minds of ourselves, other people, institutions, & every aspect of the world. Differences between mental models explain why two people can observe the same event and describe it differently; they are paying attention to different details.

Page 11: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

CHANGE

Page 12: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

RESPONSE TO CHANGE

Supportive of change

Not supportive of change

Not aligned with vision

Aligned with vision

Page 13: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

RESPONSE TO CHANGE

Supportive of change

Not supportive of change

Not aligned with vision

Aligned with vision

Page 14: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

RESPONSE TO CHANGE

Supportive of change

Not supportive of change

Not aligned with vision

Aligned with vision

Moving ahead together – goals achieved, innovation evident

“Rogue” staff – enthusiasts who are difficult to harness

Reluctance, silent resisters, grumblers, lacking confidence

Vocal opposition, resisters, underminers

Page 15: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

3rd place

COMPETING AGENDAS?

Centralised De-centralised

Networked

•  Self-managing •  Autonomous •  Customised •  Competitive •  Agile •  ‘Local’

•  Bureaucratic •  Compliant •  Equitable •  Aggregated •  Cumbersome •  ‘National’

•  Federated •  Ecosystem •  Collabetition •  Complexity theory •  ‘messy’

Cluster

Improvement agenda

Improvement •  Quality •  Achievement •  Equity •  Standardised •  “Same but better”

Tran

sfor

mat

ion

agen

da

Transformation •  Paradigm shift •  Complete, major change •  Renewal •  Metamorphosis •  “Different and better”

Page 16: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

COMPLEMENTARY AGENDAS

Centralised De-centralised

Networked

Page 17: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

COMPLEMENTARY AGENDAS

Centralised De-centralised

Networked

Page 18: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

COMPLEMENTARY AGENDAS

Centralised De-centralised

Networked

Page 19: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

COMPLEMENTARY AGENDAS

Centralised De-centralised

Networked

Page 20: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

ACTIVITY TWO

Page 21: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

What is concerning you about the future?

What are some of the questions you have?

Page 22: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

THREE LEVELS OF CONCERN

Concern about self How will this affect me? What new skills will I need? Who can help me? Where can I find the information?

Concern about task How will I do this in my class? How will students be organised? How does this link with the curriculum? What about the core competencies?

Concern about impact What difference does it make? Are we achieving what we say we want to? Who else can I collaborate with to learn from? I think I know a better way?

Page 23: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

3 TYPES OF CONCERN

Self Task Impact

Page 24: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

CBAM

Level of concern Expression of concern

Refocusing I have some ideas about something that would work better

Collaboration How can I relate what I am doing to what others are doing?

Consequence How is my use affecting learners? How can I refine it to have more impact?

Management I seem to be spending all my time getting materials ready

Personal How will using it affect me?

Informational I would like to know more about it

Awareness I am not concerned about it

Page 25: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

ACTIVITY THREE

Page 26: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

STEP ONE: LEARNING ACTIVITIES

1.  What sorts of activities do learners in your classroom engage in for learning?

2.  What is the purpose of each? 3.  How are learners organised

or arranged? 4.  What is the teacher doing? 5.  What resources are required,

and how are these made available?

Page 27: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

STEP TWO: PLANNING A LEARNING SPACE

1.  Draw the outline of a desired learning space on a sheet of paper.

2.  Focus on a particular learning activity/lesson, and draw the arrangement of learners, furniture and resources.

3.  Create a ‘story’ to explain what is happening in your learning space, and why you have arranged things this way.

Page 28: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

LEARNING SETTINGS

Page 29: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

LINKING PRINCIPLES TO PLACE

Page 30: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

Students in physical school, instruction and

assessment predominantly on-

site

Students access formal learning via

the network, instruction and

assessment provided online

Students learning through their

online personal learning network,

incl. social networking

environments

Students at home, library or other space, pursuing

own interests individually or collaboratively

FORMAL  

INFORMAL  

PHYSICAL

  VIRTUAL  

Page 31: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

e.g. Classrooms, field trips, music

exams, sports awards etc.

e.g. Virtual Learning Network, online classrooms, Coursera, virtual

field trips etc.

e.g. PLN comprising

Facebook, Twitter, Khan academy, YouTube etc.

e.g. Community library, sports

organisations, after school clubs etc.

FORMAL  

INFORMAL  

PHYSICAL

  VIRTUAL  

Page 32: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

School A

Groups

NETWORKED LEARNING

Network PLN

Federally organised Collections of entities Collaborative Networked knowledge

Externally organised Single entity Competitive Knowledge transfer

Personally organised Association of entities Connected Personal knowledge

The way networks learn is the way individuals learn

Page 33: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

MLE MATRIX

http://www.core-ed.org/professional-learning/mle-matrix

Page 34: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

MODERN LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

http://bundlr.com/b/core-education-modern-learning-enviroments

Page 35: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

ACTIVITY FOUR

Page 36: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

REMEMBER THIS…

Self Task Impact

Page 37: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

CHALLENGE:

•  How do we design professional learning experiences that address the concerns of people in each of these areas/

•  What are the consequences of a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach?

Page 38: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

CONSIDER THESE SCENARIOS…

•  What assumptions might you make about the school…

•  Leadership? •  PLD programmes? •  Age/stage of staff?

•  What sorts of things do you anticipate staff are wanting to know?

•  What approaches to PLD might be appropriate?

•  What evidence of change would you be looking for?

A

B

C

Page 39: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14
Page 40: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

WHAT THE RESEARCH SAYS ABOUT PLD:

•  Is about change •  Takes time •  Needs to be in-depth •  Should be relevant, address

concerns •  Should be in context •  Is done with you, not to you

or for you

Page 41: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

SWIMMING OUT OF OUR DEPTH?

Schools could ensure that a proportion of their teacher professional development programme is designed to support all teachers’ cognitive growth, while at the same time establishing clusters of experienced teachers who could work together across school sites (possibly online) to develop systems that better meet the needs of today’s students.

NZCER 2012

Page 42: Core LwDT team PD day Jan14

Derek Wenmoth Email: [email protected]

Blog: http://blog.core-ed.org/derek Skype: <dwenmoth>