Coqui Frog Eradication Project Lawai, Kauaito Kauai • Early Efforts • Current Efforts •...

of 32/32
Coqui Frog Eradication Project Lawai, Kauai 1 st International Conference on Coqui Frog Hilo, Hawaii February 8, 2008 Keren Gundersen, KISC Project Manager
  • date post

    15-Jul-2020
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    3
  • download

    0

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of Coqui Frog Eradication Project Lawai, Kauaito Kauai • Early Efforts • Current Efforts •...

  • Coqui Frog Eradication Project Lawai, Kauai

    1st International Conference on Coqui FrogHilo, Hawaii

    February 8, 2008Keren Gundersen, KISC Project Manager

  • Project Overview

    • Introduction of coqui to Kauai

    • Early Efforts• Current Efforts• Electronic Monitoring• Project

    status/projections• Needs

    REX

  • Kauai coqui frog infestation site

  • • Suspected introduction in 1999 to Lawai• Coqui were likely brought in via the

    nursery trade • Frogs went undetected for 2-3 years,

    establishing a breeding population

    Introduction of coqui to Kauai

  • Early Efforts

    • USDA-WS-RC – EPA approval for citric acid (2002-2003)

    • Sporadic spraying (by various groups)• Heavy foliage• No plan• By 2005 population had exploded and was

    starting to expand

  • Current Efforts

    • Clearing• Chemical control

    – Citric acid– Hydrated lime– Vegetation control w/herbicide

    • Site monitoring– Coqui habitat

    • Outreach

  • ClearingExtensive hydro-axe clearing of vegetation

  • Chemical Control16% Citric Acid

    3% Hydrated Lime

    Selective use of

    RoundUp and Garlon 4

  • MonitoringCoqui habitat

    • Long term commitment

    • Will continue to continuously monitor up to 12 months after last calling frog is heard

  • • 150 traps throughout site x 700+ days

    • 1 frog captured

    PVC Refugia Traps

  • Outreach

    http://www.hear.org/kisc/coqui_news/Worksite signage

    Weekly work notification flyers

    Work Notification Policy: http://www.hear.org/kisc/pdfs/200704coquiworknotificationpolicy.pdf

  • Outreach

    Bumper stickers

    “Nuf Already!”Pest Hotline Frog Swatter

    Fairs and Events

    Coqui PSA’s

  • Electronic Monitoring

    Olympus VN2100 model digital voice recorders

    - Small size (10x4 inches)

    - Time activated recording

    - Low cost ($40).

    Monitoring Goal:

    To show a measurable decline in the coqui population (other than human observation)

  • Custom housing

    - Rainproof- Shields recorder’s microphone

    from wind

  • Recorder locations

    • Started sampling March 27th• Recording 2-4 nights per week• 2 minutes per night• Varied sample time

  • Temporal Frequency Analysis

  • Coqui with dogs and roosters Coqui with buzzing bug

    Coqui with hard rain

    Comparison of frequencies

  • • Quantitative analysis• Automated call detection tools

    New Software

  • Apply frequency filter:

    Automated Detection

  • Run detection tool:

    Automated Detection

  • Location 4

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    4/9/20

    074/1

    9/200

    74/2

    9/200

    75/9

    /2007

    5/19/2

    007

    5/29/2

    007

    6/8/20

    076/1

    8/200

    76/2

    8/200

    77/8

    /2007

    7/18/2

    007

    7/28/2

    007

    8/7/20

    078/1

    7/200

    78/2

    7/200

    79/6

    /2007

    9/16/2

    007

    9/26/2

    007

    10/6/2

    007

    10/16

    /2007

    10/26

    /2007

    # CallsAverage # Calls

    Graph Results

  • Showing all chemical treatments within 10 meters of the recorder

    Location 4

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    4/9/20

    074/1

    9/200

    74/2

    9/200

    75/9

    /2007

    5/19/2

    007

    5/29/2

    007

    6/8/20

    076/1

    8/200

    76/2

    8/200

    77/8

    /2007

    7/18/2

    007

    7/28/2

    007

    8/7/20

    078/1

    7/200

    78/2

    7/200

    79/6

    /2007

    9/16/2

    007

    9/26/2

    007

    10/6/

    2007

    10/16

    /2007

    10/26

    /2007

    CitricLime# CallsAverage # Calls

    Compare Results to Treatments

  • Location 1

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    4/9/20

    074/1

    9/200

    74/2

    9/200

    75/9

    /2007

    5/19/2

    007

    5/29/2

    007

    6/8/20

    076/1

    8/200

    76/2

    8/200

    77/8

    /2007

    7/18/2

    007

    7/28/2

    007

    8/7/20

    078/1

    7/200

    78/2

    7/200

    79/6

    /2007

    9/16/2

    007

    9/26/2

    007

    10/6/

    2007

    10/16

    /2007

    10/26

    /2007

    CitricLime# CallsAverage # Calls

    Location 4

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    4/9/20

    074/1

    9/200

    74/2

    9/200

    75/9

    /2007

    5/19/2

    007

    5/29/2

    007

    6/8/20

    076/1

    8/200

    76/2

    8/200

    77/8

    /2007

    7/18/2

    007

    7/28/2

    007

    8/7/20

    078/1

    7/200

    78/2

    7/200

    79/6

    /2007

    9/16/2

    007

    9/26/2

    007

    10/6/

    2007

    10/16

    /2007

    10/26

    /2007

    CitricLime# CallsAverage # Calls

    Location 1 and 4

  • Location 5

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    5/20/2

    007

    5/30/2

    007

    6/9/20

    076/1

    9/200

    76/2

    9/200

    7

    7/9/20

    077/1

    9/200

    77/2

    9/200

    7

    8/8/20

    078/1

    8/200

    78/2

    8/200

    7

    9/7/20

    079/1

    7/200

    79/2

    7/200

    710

    /7/20

    0710

    /17/20

    0710

    /27/20

    07

    Citric Lime# CallsAverage # Calls

    Location 6

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    5/20/2

    007

    5/30/2

    007

    6/9/20

    076/1

    9/200

    76/2

    9/200

    7

    7/9/20

    077/1

    9/200

    77/2

    9/200

    7

    8/8/20

    07

    8/18/2

    007

    8/28/2

    007

    9/7/20

    079/1

    7/200

    79/2

    7/200

    710

    /7/20

    0710

    /17/20

    0710

    /27/20

    07

    Citric Lime# CallsAverage # Calls

    Location 5 and 6

  • • This method counts calls, not frogs

    • The range at which a call can be detected varies, depending on call density

    • The detection process tends to underestimate call density on loud nights, and overestimate on nights with few or no calls

    • Our methods can change as our monitoring goals change

    Electronic Recording Limitations & Variability

  • Pablo Yañez

    Project status/projections• 2007

    – 49,623 gallons of citric acid– 32,812 gallons of hydrated lime – 4,702 person hours

    • 2008– Continue weekly treatments 2x weekly– Continue to monitor site and nurseries– Respond to new island reports

  • Needs

    • Continued funding• Increased inter-island

    quarantine• On-island hot water

    treatment facility (mobile?)

    • Increased public education and outreach

  • Coqui Field Crew

    Duane Patricio, Joseph Aguon-Kona (Supervisor), Cherylann Lemalu, Kevin Sasaki, Robert Diaz

    (not pictured: Cyrus Correia, Lisa St. Amant, Bradley Morita)

  • Partners & Kauai Coqui Working Group

    HDOA

    County of Kauai

    CTAHR

    DOFAW USDA- Wildlife ServicesLAWAI NEIGHBORING

    RESIDENTS

  • END

    Coqui Frog �Eradication Project�Lawai, KauaiProject OverviewKauai coqui frog infestation siteSlide Number 4Slide Number 5Introduction of coqui to KauaiEarly EffortsCurrent EffortsClearingChemical ControlMonitoringPVC Refugia TrapsOutreachOutreachElectronic MonitoringCustom housingRecorder locationsTemporal Frequency AnalysisComparison of frequenciesNew SoftwareAutomated DetectionAutomated DetectionGraph ResultsCompare Results to TreatmentsLocation 1 and 4Location 5 and 6Electronic Recording �Limitations &�VariabilityProject status/projectionsNeedsCoqui Field CrewPartners &�Kauai Coqui Working GroupEND