Copyright © Eliyahu M. Goldratt 2011It was time to implement the first Freeze step in a highly...
-
Upload
vuongkhanh -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Copyright © Eliyahu M. Goldratt 2011It was time to implement the first Freeze step in a highly...
It was time to implement the first Freeze step in a highly secure area of a very large company.
Only people with certain company and government security clearances were allowed in the area – our people were not allowed in.
Now what? How to provide the appropriate support to ensure the appropriate level of understanding and actions?
From Consulting Team
To Company Management
To Line Supervisors
From Management
To “Level 6” Action Plan
From Line Supervisors
The Level 6 Action Plans provided the proof thatthe appropriate knowledge had been deliveredand the right actions would be taken.
5
5.111.1 Freeze ProjectsTask Description Action PlanListing of all Projects Project List preparedDetermine Criteria for Freezing Projects
Guide lines disseminated & placed in intranet
Prioritize Projects and Freeze
Prioritized list placed in intranet portal
Review mechanism for Freezing implementation
Display Boards in shopsWeekly Tasks list for alldepartments
Same type of table prepared for every Level 5 Step
Month Total Projects
No. projects frozen
No. Projects Completed REMARKS
JUN-10 206 NIL 3
Prior to VVJUL-10 203 NIL 8AUG-10 195 NIL 6SEP-10 189 NIL 3OCT-10 186 NIL 10
Freezing TasksNOV-10 176 NIL 16DEC-10 160 74 35 • Core team &
champions formed• Freezing ProjectsJAN-11 125 52 51
Investing in Gemba (workforce) knowledge, & gaining Gemba collaboration in detailing the actions they themselves will take, not only feels good, it pays big dividends!
The practicality of WA (harmony)
1. Knowledge & Commitment of
Top Management
2. Top Management
teaches, gains buy-in & collaboration
of next level
3. Next level teaches, gains buy-in & collaboration
of next level….
4. Etc. through the people who turn L5 into L6
actions
Month Total Projects
No. projects frozen
No. Projects Completed REMARKS
JUN-10 206 NIL 3
Prior to VVJUL-10 203 NIL 8AUG-10 195 NIL 6SEP-10 189 NIL 3OCT-10 186 NIL 10
Freezing TasksNOV-10 176 NIL 16DEC-10 160 74 35 • Core team &
champions formed• Freezing ProjectsJAN-11 125 52 51
Average = 5
Average = 13
Average = 43
Past Experience 5/month New Reality 43/month
Through September ‘10, how many projects per quarter?
What was throughput per quarter?
From January ‘11, how many projects per quarter?
What is the new throughput per quarter?
Assumptions: SP per project ∼ $500k, T ∼ 40%
5 43
$1m $8.6m
How much more profit is generated per quarter?
Per year?$7.6m
$30.4m
Month Total Projects
Projects Completed
Change from Prior
Month
Cumulative Change
JUN-10 206 3
JUL-10 203 8 -1% -1%
AUG-10 195 6 -4% -5%
SEP-10 189 3 -3% -8%
OCT-10 186 10 -2% -10%
NOV-10 176 16 -5% -15%
DEC-10 160 35 -9% -25%
JAN-11 125 51 -22% -46%
206 203195 189 186
176160
125
-1%
-5%-8%
-10%
-15%
-25%
-46%
-50%
-45%
-40%
-35%
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
0
50
100
150
200
250
Perc
enta
ge C
hang
e
Num
ber o
f Pro
ject
s
Trend of the Projects Backlog
Projects in Backlog
Cumulative Change
Process On the Shoulders of Critical Path
1. The giant2. Enormity of unaffected area3. Getting on the giant’s
shoulders4. Conceptual difference5. Wrong assumption6. Full analysis
1. CCPM2. All projects3. Understanding how multitasking was
taught, and evaluating the existing Projects S&T.
4. The full impact of multitasking on capacity was not recognized.
5. Multitasking stretches lead time significantly but has little impact on the touch time itself.
6. The freeze mechanisms; approach to implementation; modifications needed to S&T’s. Implications on other S&T’s.