Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Copyright @ 2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc.
-
Upload
grace-mills -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Copyright @ 2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc.
WHAT WE WILL LEARN
1) The types of legal disputes addressed by Texas courts2) The procedures followed by trial and appellate courts in Texas3) The various courts in Texas, and the types of cases each court hears4) The terms of office, method of selection, and qualifications for judges in Texas5) How judges are chosen in Texas, and why is judicial selection in the state controversial
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Edwards Aquifer Authority vs. Day
Rule of Capture – Legal principle that each landowner has the right to withdraw an unlimited amount of groundwater from his or her own land by tapping into an underlying aquifer
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Case Study
The most important underground natural resource in drought-parched Texas may not be oil or gas but water, and the Texas Supreme Court is poised to decide who controls it.
If landowners can pump an unlimited amount of underground water from their property, they can deplete the resource, leaving their neighbors’ wells dry.• The rule of capture would become the “law of the biggest straw.”
Criminal Cases – Alleged violation of a penal law
Parties in a Criminal Case• Defendant – Party charged with the criminal offense• Prosecutor – Attorney who tries a criminal case on behalf of the
government
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Types of Legal Disputes
Burden of Proof – The prosecutor has the burden of proof to show the defendant’s guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Classification of Criminal Offenses – The penal code classifies criminal cases according to their severity.
Misdemeanor – A relatively minor criminal offense• Categories – Class A, B, or C
Felony – A serious criminal offenseCategories – Capital (life or death penalty); 1st degree; 2nd degree; 3rd degree; State jail felony (4th degree)
Civil Case: A legal dispute concerning a private conflict between two or more parties – individuals, corporations, or government agencies
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Types of Legal Disputes
Parties in a Civil Case• Plaintiff – Party initiating the lawsuit.• Defendant – Responding party.
Burden of Proof• The plaintiff has the burden to prove their case “by a preponderance of the
evidence.”
Tort Case – Personal injury or damage to propertyContract Case – Disputes over written or implied legal agreementsDomestic-Relations Case – Relationships between husband and wife, and between parents and childrenProbate Case – Disposition of the property of a deceased individualProperty Case – Ownership of real estate or personal possessions such as jewelry or an automobile
Adversary Proceeding – Each side presents evidence and arguments to bolster its position, while rebutting evidence submitted by the other side.
Civil Cases – Litigants may resolve the dispute by settling out of court rather than going through the trial process.Criminal Cases – The defendant and the prosecutor may resolve the case through a plea bargain –• Defendant agrees to plead guilty in order to receive
punishment less than the maximum for the offenseCopyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Court Procedures
Most legal disputes are settled through a process of negotiation and compromise between the parties, not by trials.
Trials and Appeals
Trials• Procedures – Formal examination of a civil or criminal action in
accordance with the law before a single judge who has jurisdiction to hear the dispute
• Involves – Attorneys, witnesses, testimony, evidence, judges, and juries
• Process – In general, the trial court is concerned with questions of facts and the law as it applies to those facts.
• Verdict – Determines in a civil case which party prevails in the lawsuit, and in a criminal case whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty as charged and their punishment.
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Court Procedures
Trials and Appeals
Appeals• Taking a case from a lower court to a higher court by the losing
party in a lower-court decision• The losing party in a civil case may allege that the lower court failed
to follow proper procedures or incorrectly applied the law.• A criminal defendant may contend the trial court committed
reversible error – a mistake that is serious enough to warrant a new trial because the mistake could have affected the outcome of the original trial.
• Attorneys, written and oral arguments, and written court records• The appellate court is concerned with issues of law and procedure.• The court may uphold, reverse, or modify the lower-court decision.
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Court Procedures
Three levels
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
The Texas Court System
Local courts• Municipal courts, justice of the peace (JP) courts, and county
courts hear relatively minor civil cases and misdemeanor criminal disputes.
District courts• The general trial courts of the state; hear major civil disputes and
try felony criminal casesAppellate courts• The Texas Courts of Appeals, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals,
and Texas Supreme Court constitute the state’s appellate court system.
Municipal Courts
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Local Courts
The Texas legislature has created municipal courts in every incorporated city in the state.• Operate in 920 cities staffed by 1,531 judges
• Criminal jurisdiction – Class C misdemeanor offenses• Exclusive jurisdiction involving violations of city
ordinances – laws enacted by the governing body of a municipality
• Traffic cases account for more than 80 percent of the workload.
• Perform magistrate duties
Justice of the Peace Courts (JP)
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Local Courts
The Texas Constitution requires each county to operate at least one JP court – larger counties to have as many as 16. • 2011: 819 JP courts operated statewide• Criminal jurisdiction – Class C misdemeanor offenses• Civil jurisdiction – civil cases involving amounts of
money of no more than $10,000• Small claims cases and evictions• Perform magistrate duties
County Courts – Constitutional County Courts
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Local Courts
Created by Texas Constitution in each of the state’s 254 counties • Criminal jurisdiction – Class A and B misdemeanor
offenses
• Civil jurisdiction – civil cases involving amounts of money between $200 and $5,000
• Handle appeals de novo (new trials) from justice of peace courts or municipal courts
County Courts – Statutory County Courts
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Local Courts
The Texas legislature has created 233 additional statutory county courts and 18 statutory probate courts.• Criminal jurisdiction – Class A and B misdemeanor
offenses
• Civil jurisdiction – civil cases involving amounts of money up to $100,000
• Class C misdemeanor appeals from JP or municipal courts and civil case appeals from JP courts
Texas has 456 district courts
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
District Courts
• Each court serves a specific geographic area, which may encompass several counties in the rural areas.
• Basic trial courts of the state• Criminal jurisdiction – felony offenses• Civil jurisdiction – civil cases involving amounts
of money of $200 or more
Appeals filed by litigants who lose in lower courts
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Appellate Courts
• Review the trial court record, hear oral arguments, study legal briefs from attorneys, and render a decision/opinion
• Affirm the lower-court decision• Reverse it• Modify it• Affirm part of the lower-court ruling while
reversing or modifying the rest
Three types of opinions
Dissenting Opinion – A written judicial statement that disagrees with the decision of the court’s majority
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Appellate Court Opinions
Majority Opinion – The official written statement of the court that explains and justifies its ruling and serves as a guideline for lower courts
Concurring Opinion – A written judicial statement that agrees with the court’s ruling but disagrees with the reasoning of the majority
Three types of appellate courts
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Types of Appellate Courts
Courts of AppealsTexas Supreme CourtTexas Court of Criminal AppealsTexas is one of two states (Oklahoma is the other) with two supreme courts.• The Texas Supreme Court – civil disputes• The Court of Criminal Appeals – criminal matters
Courts of Appeals
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Types of Appellate Courts
14 courts of appeals, each serving a specific geographic area• Decide both civil and criminal appeals from the district
and county courts, except death penalty appeals, which go directly to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
• 80 justices staff the 14 courts of appeal• Number of justices in each court varies from 3 to 13,
depending on the workload
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Types of Appellate Courts
• Highest (supreme) appellate court for all criminal cases in the state
• Death penalty cases appealed directly from the district court
• Consists of one presiding justice and eight additional judges
• Decisions from this court may be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court when they involve matters of federal law or the U.S. Constitution.
Texas Supreme Court
• Highest (supreme) appellate court for all civil cases
• Consists of one chief justice and eight associate justices
• Decisions from this court may be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court when they involve matters of federal law or the U.S. Constitution.
• Administers the judicial branch of state government
More than 3,200 judges staff Texas courts.
• Municipal judge• Justice of peace judge• Constitutional county judge• Statutory county judge• District judge• Appellate judge
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Judges
The Texas judicial system is staffed by a wide array of judges. • May possess different qualifications and serve for different
terms
Except for some municipal judges who are appointed, Texas judges are chosen by partisan election –• Both the names of the candidates and their party
affiliations appear on the ballot.
Texas and seven other states elect judges via partisan elections.• A substantial number of the state’s district and
appellate judges first reach the bench through gubernatorial appointment.
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Judicial Selection
Is Justice for Sale in Texas?
Critics believe that money plays too prominent a role in the process.
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Judicial SelectionPartisan Elections• Successful candidates for the Texas Supreme Court must raise and
spend at least $800,000.
• Candidates for district judgeships may raise and spend more than $30,000 on their campaigns.
Do Voters Know the Candidates?
Critics also charge that many voters are unable to intelligently evaluate the qualifications of judicial candidates.
Elections suggest that voters are often uninformed about the judicial candidates.
Representative of the State’s Population?
Diversity – Critics of judicial selection also note that it has produced a judiciary that does not reflect the ethnic and racial diversity of the state’s population.
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Judicial Selection
Partisan Politics vs. Judicial Impartiality
Partisan Politics – Is partisan politics incompatible with judicial impartiality?
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Judicial Selection
Can a Republican defendant receive a fair trial from a Democratic judge or vice versa?• As long as Texas elects judges on a partisan ballot, at
least some individuals will believe that party politics will determine the outcomes, rather than the law and the constitution.
Reforming the Judicial Selection Process
Merit selection (or the Missouri Plan): combines gubernatorial appointment with voter approval in a retention election
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Judicial Selection
Former Chief Justice John Hill’s Plan• Selection of a 15-member nominating commission to recommend to
the governor a list of three to five qualified persons from which the governor would fill a vacancy on the bench
• Approval of the governor’s choice by a two-thirds confirmation vote in the state Senate
• Newly appointed judges must face a retention election in the next general election and receive a majority of the vote to continue for a full multiyear term before facing another retention election.
Other Proposed Reforms
Ballot Modification: Requiring nonpartisan elections and prohibiting straight-ticket voting for judicial elections
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Judicial Selection
Nonpartisan Election – Candidates run without party labels
Eliminating Straight-Ticket Voting – casting ballots only for the candidates of one party
Judicial Departure – due to death, retirement, loss of reelection, or removal by competent authority
Copyright @2012, 2011, 2009, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc
Judicial Retirement and Removal
Removal • Incompetence or unethical conduct• Disciplinary actions – an admonition, warning, reprimand, or
recommendation to remove from office• Impeachment by majority vote in the state House and removal by a
two-thirds vote of the Senate
Visiting Judges
Judges who have retired or been defeated for reelection to continue working as visiting judges