Copyright © 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Hydrology DWG/ad hoc 67th...
-
Upload
bethany-bennett -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Copyright © 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Hydrology DWG/ad hoc 67th...
Copyright © 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Copyright © 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved.Reserved.
Hydrology DWG/ad hocHydrology DWG/ad hoc
67th OGC Technical Committee
Valencia, Spain
Simon Cox
December 4, 2008
Sponsored by
Instituto Geográfico Nacional (IGN of Spain)
Copyright © 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Helping the World to CommunicateGeographically
AgendaAgenda
• Report on WMO CHy meeting– David Arctur, OGC
• Hydrology DWG Charter Discussion– Scope – Modifications to charter if required
• A hydrology framework – an example of the challenge of managing dependencies in framework datasets– Rob Atkinson, CSIRO
• WaterML harmonization report– Simon Cox, CSIRO
• GRDC Hydrologic metadata profile– Simon Cox, CSIRO (on behalf of Ulrich Looser, GRDC)
• Other reports• Motion to TC to form Hydrology DWG
Copyright © 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Helping the World to CommunicateGeographically
JustificationJustification
• OGC member interest• WMO-CHy interest (Bruce Stewart)
– “Can you do this thing which we don’t seem to be able to do ourselves”– Help with methodology & continuity, process
• Hydrology has strong X-Domain requirements• Clear relationship with other OGC activities
– SWE– GALEON
• Domain modelling exemplar• Help generate reference model/best practice for framework datasets• Can the OGC methodology develop a product which is adoptable by an
international authority?
• How is this all different to a conventional OGC DWG?• Coordination & community representation• Do we need a different kind of WG within OGC?
Copyright © 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Helping the World to CommunicateGeographically
Charter issuesCharter issues
• Joint committee with CHy– Explicitly reserve co-chair for WMO CHy nominee
• Visible linkage to WMO is evidence to the community that this activity has a plausible mandate
– Co-branded specifications?
• DWG– Charter to note that will make regular reports to ESS + tech working groups
• Allow for participation of non-members of OGC
• and/or an OGC Interoperability Experiment
• (Side effect: Hydrology as an exemplar of a methodology which contributes to development of a SDI design and maintenance process)
Copyright © 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Helping the World to CommunicateGeographically
Other interested parties and initiativesOther interested parties and initiatives
• WISE
Copyright © 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Helping the World to CommunicateGeographically
WaterML v2 progressWaterML v2 progress
• Harmonization of CUAHSI WaterML + O&M (etc)• CSIRO + CUAHSI (SDSC) have commenced work• Activity leads:
– Peter Taylor (CSIRO)– David Valentine (SDSC)– + Simon Cox, Gavin Walker (CSIRO), Bora Beran (Microsoft)
• Aiming at June 2009 for completed draft.
Copyright © 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Helping the World to CommunicateGeographically
ActionsActions
• Charter revision– DavidA to tweak/revise charter (r2) in view of today’s discussion– Josh + Clemens + Rob to comment on r2
• Defer formal initiation of Hydrology WG to next TC
• Initiate an IE– MarkR suggesting …
Copyright © 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Helping the World to CommunicateGeographically
MotionsMotions
• Sample Motion:
• The <WG name> recommends that the OGC Technical Committee approve release of <OGC Document Number> “<OGC Document Name>” as an OGC <Discussion/Best Practices> Document– Pending and final edits and review by OGC staff– <Any Discussion Points that the TC needs to be aware of>– Motion: <Name of person making the motion>– Second: <name of the person seconding the motion>– If there is a hand vote, the results of the vote. Otherwise, the phrase
<There was no objection to unanimous consent> should be used