Wiley-Blackwell Art, Architecture, & Museum Studies Subject Leaflet
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.1 Power Point Slides for: Financial Institutions, Markets,...
-
Upload
leonel-meriweather -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.1 Power Point Slides for: Financial Institutions, Markets,...
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1
Power Point Slides for:
Financial Institutions, Markets, and Money, 9th Edition
Authors: Kidwell, Blackwell, Whidbee &
Peterson
Prepared by: Babu G. Baradwaj, Towson University
And
Lanny R. Martindale, Texas A&M University
CHAPTER 16
REGULATION OF FINANCIAL
INSTITUTIONS
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 3
Financial institutions are heavily regulated because society heavily depends on them.
Financial intermediation necessarily involves “asymmetric information”.
Failures of financial institutions involve high social and economic costs.
The power to allocate credit is a significant and valuable social and economic power.
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4
Financial intermediation necessarily involves “asymmetric information”.
Most SSUs cannot expertly gauge a financial institution’s safety or soundness.
Regulation is a mechanism for trust without personal verification.
Regulators impose uniform standards of safety and soundness
Reliance on regulatory standards replaces individual trust in institutions
Benefits of financial intermediation are institutionalized into society
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 5
Failures of financial institutions involve high social and economic costs.
“Fallout” is worse than that of other business failures.Abrupt shrinkage of credit disrupts commerce; economic uncertainty inhibits saving, investing, and social progress;total costs to society typically exceed value of the institution.
Regulation is a mechanism for preventing failures, or confining their effects.
Regulators monitor safety and soundness proactively; deposit insurance protects against panic; central banks
maintain liquidity in system “lenders of last resort.”
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 6
The power to allocate credit is a significant and valuable social and economic power.
So significant that government naturally seeks to share it.
So valuable that financial institutions accept regulation as a condition of it.
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 7
Major Banking Laws, 1913-1980 (Exhibit 16.1)
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 8
Major Banking Laws, 1982-1999 (Exhibit 16.1)
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 9
Much bank regulation is aimed at preventing bank failures
Generally, banks fail for either of 2 reasons:
ILLIQUIDITY
Inability to disburse cash as promised.
INSOLVENCY
Insufficiency of assets to cover liabilities.
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 10
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11
ILLIQUDITY
An institution may be profitable, but still become illiquid.
Too many depositors may withdraw at once.
Loan demand may exceed planned funding ability.
Too many long-term assets may be funded with short-term liabilities.
Failures caused by illiquidity are preventable. Regulators proactively monitor funding practices.
Regulators can arrange for emergency funding
(e.g. Discount Window).
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 12
INSOLVENCY
If investments lose value or if loans default, a bank’s capital can erode.
Because banks are highly leveraged, insolvency can happen when asset values fall by a relatively small amount.
Regulators emphasize adequate capitalization—Minimum capital standards in terms of risk-weighted assets.Severe sanctions for undercapitalization.
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 13
Lessons of Past Bank Failures
By guaranteeing depositors’ funds, the FDIC has effectively prevented runs on institutions it insures.
Regional or industrywide depressions are a major cause of bank failures.
Fraud, embezzlement, malfeasance, and poor management are the most notable causes of bank failures.
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 14
The FDIC
Two insurance funds:
BIF — Bank Insurance Fund
SAIF — Savings Association Insurance Fund
FDIC insurance mandatory for commercial banks, savings banks & savings associations
Coverage: $100,000 per depositor per institution.
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 15
2 Ways the FDIC HandlesFailed Banks
Payoff & Liquidation
Purchase & Assumption
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 16
Payoff & Liquidation
Pay off insured depositors
Take over institution & sell off assets
Pay other claimants against institution in order of their priority
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 17
Order of claims
1) expenses of receiver
2) depositors1. FDIC as successor to insured depositors already
paid
2. partial settlement with uninsured depositors depending on proceeds of liquidation
3) general creditors
4) subordinated creditors
5) shareholders
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 18
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 19
Purchase & Assumption
Take over and operate institution as going concern
Find new ownership for institution and/or selected assets—
“Clean Bank”—buyer can “put” troubled assets back to FDIC
“Whole Bank”—buyer assumes entire balance sheet
Guarantee deposits but don’t pay off depositors; hand them over to new management
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 20
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 21
Deposit Insurance Issues
Moral Hazard
“Too Big to Fail”
“Policing”
Premiums
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 22
Moral Hazard
Reduces incentive of depositors to be careful
Increases temptation of depository institutions to “gamble” on higher risks
Coverage is limited or “capped” for this reason. Uninsured depositors may take losses.
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 23
“Too Big to Fail”
To protect the economy, the government implicitly promises full bailout of the largest institutions
This creates a “two-tiered” banking industry
This adds to the temptation of the largest institutions to “gamble”
Of course the government does not explicitly say which banks it would save
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 24
“Policing”
Insurance Agencies as “Police”: Depositors aren’t worried. They have no incentive to withdraw funds from an institution even if it is taking many risks. Deposit insurance funds must thus have a “police” mentality—try to protect the public who no longer protect themselves. This is a major reason institutions must be regularly examined.
Stockholders and Creditors as “Police”: No insurance for them.If a bank is very risky, buyers of its securities will demand a very high return. Thus the capital market imposes a risk premium for risky banks. Bank examinations are costly and infrequent, but investors will monitor bank risk-taking and bid prices of the bank’s securities up or down as appropriate.
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 25
Premiums
For many years all banks paid the same premium rate
Now premiums increase or decrease depending on—
capitalization
examiner ratings
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 26
Bank Examination
All U.S. depository institutions are regularly examined by at least one regulator.
For National Banks, it is the OCC—the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
For state banks who are members of the Federal Reserve System, it is the Federal Reserve and the state banking agency.
For nonmember state banks it is the FDIC and the state banking agency.
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 27
Safety & Soundness Examinations
Promote and maintain safe and sound bank operating practices
Procedure includes:bank financial information collected quarterly (call reports)
on-site bank examinations
discussion of findings with management
“CAMELS” rating
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 28
CAMELS Ratings
1 (Best) to 5 (Worst) in each of 6 areas:
Capital adequacy
Asset quality
Management competency
Earnings
Liquidity
Sensitivity to Market Risk
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 29
CAMELS Rating System (Exhibit 16.5)
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 30
Other Examinations
Community Reinvestment Act compliance
Consumer compliance
Trust Department examinations as applicable
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 31
Structure & Competition Regulations
Branching
Deposit Rate Ceilings
Commercial banking vs. Investment Banking
Financial Services Modernization Act
Balance Sheet Restrictions
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 32
Branching
For years branching was tightly controlled and subject to conflicting state regulations as well as ambiguous federal regulations.
Interstate branching required approval of all states involved.
Bank holding companies evolved as a regulatory avoidance technique.
Today, after the Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994—
All banks can freely branch across state lines as long as it is through acquisition of another bank or branch.If allowed by state law, a bank can create a new branch (“de novo” branching) across state lines.
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 33
Deposit Rate Ceilings
Until 1980 “Reg Q” rate ceilings kept institutions from competing directly.
Ceilings are gone now, but “innovation around” them left us with—
MMDAs
MMMFs
NOW Accounts
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 34
Commercial Banking vs. Investment Banking
Glass-Steagall restrictions were gradually relaxed in the 1980s and 1990s.
Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 repealed most restrictions, allowing U.S. commercial banks affiliated subsidiaries for—
investment bankinginsuranceother financial activities
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 35
Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999
Banks can have securities and insurance subsidiariesA new organizational form, financial holding companies (FHCs), can have many different kinds of financial institutions as subsidiariesInsurance companies and securities firms can acquire commercial banks and form FHCs with Federal Reserve approvalInstitutions must obey new privacy rules about sharing customer informationFederal Reserve is “umbrella” supervisor over FHCs while bank and nonbank subsidiaries fall under of other regulators (“functional regulation”).
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 36
Balance Sheet Restrictions
Banks cannot hold equity securities
Banks cannot lend more than 15% of capital to one borrower
Most banks cannot hold securities rated less than “investment grade”
Regulators impose minimum liquidity and capital requirements
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 37
Consumer Protection Regulations
State usury laws - loan rate ceilings
Truth in Lending (1968)
Equal Credit Opportunity Act (1974; 1976)
Fair Credit Billing Act (1974)
Community Reinvestment Act (1978)
Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970/Fair &Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 38
Bank Regulators
50 state banking agencies
FDIC (BIF; SAIF)
Federal Reserve
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Office of Thrift Supervision
Copyright© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 39
Division of Responsibilities Among Bank Regulators (Exhibit 16.6)