ReferenceUSDOERTTTTLEUInstructional Improvement SystemsB. Standards and AssessmentsB1. Common standards InternalRTTT APRSTUData coachesC. Data Systems to Support InstructionB2. High-quality assessmentsOtherDUSTEM ResidencyD. Great Teachers and LeadersB3. Transition to enhanced standards and assessmentsC&CRTeach For AmericaE. Turning Around Lowest Achieving SchoolsC1. Data Systems to Support InstructionT&LModel Staffing InitiativeC2. Accessing and Using State DataOtherDelaware Leadership ProjectC3. Ensuring implementation of instructional improvement systemDelaware Teaching FellowsD1. High Quality Leadership PathwaysIdentity management systemD2. Improving teacher and principal effectiveness based on performanceData WarehouseD3. Ensuring equitable distribution of effective teachers and principalsWeb Portal DevelopmentD4. Improving preparation programsData DictionaryD5. Providing effective support to teachers and principalsClient ID CrosswalkE1. Intervening in lowest achieving schoolsStudent Data ExchangeCommon Course CodesProject ManagementData GovernanceIHE MOUIdentify PZ Schools PZ School ImplementationAcademic Achievement AwardsTalent Transfer InitiativeTalent RetentionHuman Capital AnalyticsTeacher recruitment portalRTTT Communications - Family

MenusUSDOERTTTTLEUInstructional Improvement SystemsB. Standards and AssessmentsB1. Common standards InternalOtherSTUData coachesC. Data Systems to Support InstructionB2. High-quality assessmentsDUSTEM ResidencyD. Great Teachers and LeadersB3. Transition to enhanced standards and assessmentsC&CRTeach For AmericaE. Turning Around Lowest Achieving SchoolsC1. Data Systems to Support InstructionT&LModel Staffing InitiativeC2. Accessing and Using State DataOtherDelaware Leadership ProjectC3. Ensuring implementation of instructional improvement systemDelaware Teaching FellowsD1. High Quality Leadership PathwaysIdentity management systemD2. Improving teacher and principal effectiveness based on performanceData WarehouseD3. Ensuring equitable distribution of effective teachers and principalsWeb Portal DevelopmentD4. Improving preparation programsData DictionaryD5. Providing effective support to teachers and principalsClient ID CrosswalkE1. Intervening in lowest achieving schoolsStudent Data ExchangeCommon Course CodesProject ManagementData GovernanceIHE MOUIdentify PZ Schools PZ School ImplementationAcademic Achievement AwardsTalent Transfer InitiativeTalent RetentionHuman Capital AnalyticsTeacher recruitment portal

DP TemplateDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated August 15, 2012ProjectSelect projectProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchCriterionSelect criterionSubcriterionSelect subcriterion

SummaryOverview of Project

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Measures of SuccessOwnerStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableActivity or Deliverable Lead/OwnerList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal"

TargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reached

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

Common Core StandardsDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 14, 2014ProjectSelect projectCommon Core StandardsProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerShelley RouserUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchT&LCriterionSelect criterionB. Standards and AssessmentsSubcriterionSelect subcriterionB1. Common standards

SummaryOverview of ProjectThe Common Core Standards (CCS) Initiative, coordinated by National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers developed a common core of state standards in English Language Arts and Mathematics for grades K-12. The State Board of Education adopted the CCS in August 2010 which were internationally benchmarked and will ensure that students graduate college and career ready. After the adoption of the new Standards, the State of Delaware embarked on building, implementing, and revising statewide standards to ensure a smooth and rapid transition to the CCS. This alignment of the Standards was conducted by DDOE, Teaching and Learning Branch of the Curriculum Workgroup division. A Gap Analysis tool and a new Standards alignment document were completed in the summer of 2010. After the State Board of Education adopted the CCS, plans for administrative and teacher professional development were launched in the fall 2010 to assist LEA personnel and teachers to help them prepare to adjust their curricula accordingly. The professional development was conducted by Webinar addressing the understandings of the CCS and the Delaware Prioritized Curriculum through Component 1 and Component 2 training.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)If the DDOE develops and disseminates high-quality model curricula, professional development, and other supplemental resources to teachers and school leaders, educators will have the appropriate knowledge and capacity to deliver the new richer and more rigorous standards and will be better equipped to prepare students to succeed in higher education and the workforce. Start DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. List current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedAdoption of Standards7/31/108/31/10USDOEXAlignment of Standards5/3/107/1/10USDOEXTeacher PD on Common Core Standards Component 16/1/101/31/11USDOEXTeacher PD on Common Core Standards Component 26/15/101/31/11USDOEXLiteracy Concept Organizers ELA K-1211/1/103/31/11USDOEXSupplemental Transitional Tools for ELA9/1/1112/31/11USDOEXMath Learning Progressions K-1211/19/106/30/11USDOEXModel Lesson Development ELA K-121/3/1112/30/11USDOEXModel Lesson Development MATH K-124/1/1112/30/11USDOEXSupplemental Transitional Tools for Math9/1/1112/31/11USDOEXPilot model lessons ELA and post on website 8/1/1112/31/11InternalXPilot Model Lessons MATH based on KUD8/1/1112/31/11USDOEXPD For Statewide Implementation of New Lessons (Math)11/1/116/15/12USDOEXDistricts Align Curriculum to New Common Core in ELA & MATH8/1/1212/31/12USDOEXMath Learning Progressions K-121/15/122/28/12InternalXModel Lesson Development MATH K-124/1/126/30/12InternalXMath Cadre convened to support development of Math Model Lessons12/1/122/28/12InternalXPilot model lessons ELA and post on website 1/1/123/31/12USDOEXPilot Model Lessons MATH based on KUD2/1/126/30/12USDOEXPD For Statewide Implementation of New Lessons (ELA)6/1/128/15/12USDOEXPD For Statewide Implementation of New Lessons (Math)9/1/1212/30/12USDOEXPlanning and execution of Gusskey training on Evaluation of PD2/1/133/30/13InternalXLaunch (2 day kick-off) of Common Ground for Common Core iniatiave3/23/133/27/13InternalXDevelop tools and resources to support school planning --> rubric and sample school Common Core plan4/16/134/1/13InternalXDOE support and technical assistance to schools during the Common Core planning process; schools required to submit plans to DOE4/1/136/30/13InternalXDevelopment of Blackboard site for further dissemination of CCSS materials3/1/135/31/13InternalXDevelopment and dissemination of online PD modules9/1/127/31/13InternalXEvaluate and Monitor District Curriculum aligned to new Common Core Standards in ELA and Math (via 502 Alignment Process)1/3/148/30/14USDOERigorous Preparation for Increased Number of Students Graduating 7/1/148/15/14USDOETargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedTeachers trained on the new standards by end of SY 2010-1170007/1/11RTTTXCurriculum refined and new instructional units created50%End of SY10-11RTTTXCurriculum refined and new instructional units created100%End of SY11-12RTTTXIncreased number of students college-ready (as measured by percent of students meeting SAT readiness benchmark of 1550)N/AEnd of SY13-14RTTTN/AGraduation Rate89%2017RTTT APRCollege Enrollment Rate70%2013/2014RTTT APR

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this space

DCAS AssessmentDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 6, 2014ProjectSelect projectDCAS AssessmentProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerBrian TouchetteUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchOffice of AssessmentCriterionSelect criterionB. Standards and AssessmentsSubcriterionSelect subcriterionB2. High-quality assessments

SummaryOverview of ProjectDDOE will contract with a nationally recognized assessment vendor to work collaboratively with DDOE assessment and curriculum staff in the development and implementation of an online adaptive state assessment system. This system- the Delaware Comprehensive Assessment System (DCAS) - The DCAS will be administered up to three times each year and will generate student performance scores that serve as the basis for both federal accountability reporting and progress-tracking for all students in Delaware public schools. Following the initial implementation year (2010-2011), DDOE will work with the assessment vendor to enhance predictive and analytic capacity of the DCAS, helping to inform LEAs and schools early on in the school year those students who should be considered for acceleration or academic support.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)The administration of a new, more rigorous computer-adaptive assessment will provide teachers with a more comprehensive and accurate tool that covers a wider range of subject areas and includes multiple, within-year assessments to help them inform instruction immediately and in a more targeted fashion, ultimately resulting in improved student achievement outcomes. Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedConduct Initial Field Tests and Analyisis/ Studies90+% of items usable for assessment12/1/095/31/10USDOEXEstablish DDOE Helpdesk for teachers on DCAS Assessment Operation and ReportingUser satisfaction statistics;total time to resolve help request9/1/1011/1/10USDOEXConduct Fall Assessment90% of eligible students in grades 3-10 complete each of three administrations of DCAS annually (Fall, Winter, Spring)10/11/1011/19/10USDOEXImplement School Leader Training on DCAS Data Analysis95% of school administrators attend training12/1/101/31/11USDOEXImplement Teacher Training on DCAS Data Analysis95% of classroom teachers receive training1/1/113/30/11USDOEXDesign Parent End of Year Reports Parent report contains necessary information 1/1/114/15/11USDOEXConduct Mid-year Assessment90% of eligible students in grades 3-10 complete each of three administrations of DCAS annually (Fall, Winter, Spring)1/5/114/11/11USDOEXConduct Field Test for End /Course Assessment Block 195+% of Eligible HS students participate in FT1/5/111/31/11USDOEXConduct Spring Assessment90% of eligible students in grades 3-10 complete each of three administrations of DCAS annually (Fall, Winter, Spring)4/18/116/3/11USDOEXConduct Field Test for End /Course Assessment Block 295+% of Eligible HS students participate in FT4/18/116/3/11USDOEXImplement Online Teacher Training on DCAS Data Analysis95% of classroom teachers have opportunity to receive training5/1/116/15/11USDOEXConfirmatory Standard Setting Prior to Final Calculations of Student Proficiency and AYPFinal Cut Scores and Performance Standards are established 6/1/116/24/11USDOEXDevelop high priority DCAS test items90% of priority items are approved for operations during the 2011-2012 school year6/1/118/15/11USDOEXLaunch Educator Online Training WebinarsNumber of site visits and completed online training per yr6/1/118/15/11USDOEXLaunch/Maintain Web-based DCAS Databank for data analysis% of survey respondents (data coaches) who report Databank provides information that helps inform instruction7/1/117/15/11USDOEXProvide Defined Data Analysis Reports to DDOE staff, Data Coaches and School TeamsUse of DCAS reports to improve instruction as measured by self-report or observation (administrator)Use of DCAS reports to improve instruction as measured by increase in student performance F-S in 2011-12, 2012-13 (subsequent years of implementation see greater increase in F-S improvement) 9/1/1112/1/11USDOEXEducator DCAS training workshops using train-the-trainer model to provide detailed guide to DCAS data analysis and application to instructional improvement 1/1/123/30/12internalXTargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedBy the end of the 2010-11 school year, the State expects that 100% of DCAS tests will be in place, which will include at least three formative assessments.100%End of SY10-11RTTTXCourses taught using new assessment system 80%100%SY10-11SY11-12RTTTXTeachers trained on new assessments by end of SY 2010-11 100%SY10-11RTTTXPercent of teachers in testable subjects using DCAS as the technology-base for their IIS80%100%End of SY10-11End of SY11-12RTTTXGraduation rate87%SY12-13RTTTX% of teachers implementing a differentiated instructional approach in classrooms based on DCAS data reviewed in PLCs (as measured by classroom observations/data coach feedback)OtherXTeachers trained on new assessments (100% in 2010-11)100%SY10-11OtherX% of educators who rate DCAS training workshops effective or highly effective (Need to set target)80%SY12-13OtherX% of parents who rate Parent DCAS Reports as easy to understand and actionable80%SY12-13OtherX% of educators who report that DCAS and aligned training improve their ability to provide effective support to students and differentiate instruction (need to set target)80%SY12-13OtherX

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsProjects 5,7,12,21, 22,23,40Additional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

DCAS AltDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 6, 2014ProjectSelect projectDCAS Alternate AssessmentProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerBrian TouchetteUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchOffice of AssessmentCriterionSelect criterionB. Standards and AssessmentsSubcriterionSelect subcriterionB2. High-quality assessments

SummaryOverview of ProjectDDOE will contract with a nationally recognized assessment vendor to work collaboratively with DDOE assessment and curriculum staff in the development and implementation of an assessment system for the evaluation of severely cognitively and/or physically disabled students designated as unable to participate in the regular DCAS assessment. This system- the Delaware Comprehensive Assessment System Alternate Assessment (DCAS-Alt)- will mirror the DCAS in its test blueprint and reporting- thereby assuring (a) assessment of severely disabled students in the academic content standards of Reading, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies , and (b ) reporting student scores in formats similar to the reporting system developed for the DCAS regular assessment. Similar to the DCAS scores, DCAS-Alt scores will be used in both federal accountability reporting and progress-tracking for students in Delaware public schools.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completed Development and Process RFPSufficient tasks ready for review9/1/1012/15/10USDOEXNegotiate and Award ContractSufficient tasks ready for review11/24/101/18/11USDOEXTask Development for ELA/ Math 2011 Field TestSufficient tasks ready for review1/18/112/22/11USDOEXOnline Procedure and Report DevelopmentAll specifications completed2/4/114/29/11USDOEXTask Content and Bias Review90+% of items usable for assessment2/28/113/4/11USDOEXTask Development for Science/Social Studies 2012 TestSufficient tasks ready for review3/7/115/27/11USDOEXManual and Booklet Production and DistributionAll schools receive needed materials3/7/114/28/11USDOEXTeacher TrainingAll test administrators certified3/14/114/8/11USDOEXConduct Field Tests, Analyses, Studies for ELA/Math90+% students given field tests5/9/116/3/11USDOEXConduct ELA/Math Standard Setting Final Cut Scores and Performance Standards Presented to State Board6/6/117/21/11USDOEXPrepare for Initial Assessment ELA/MathAll schools receive needed materials6/30/119/9/11USDOEXConduct Initial Assessment ELA/Math 95+% of eligible students complete assessment9/6/119/30/11USDOEXPrepare for Spring Operational ELA/Math and Sci/SS TestsAll schools receive needed materials1/4/124/2/12USDOEXConduct Spring Assessment ELA/Math95+% of eligible students complete assessment4/2/125/11/12USDOEXConduct Concurrent Field/Operational Tests, Studies for Sci/Soc Studies90+% of items usable for assessment4/2/125/11/12USDOEXPrepare and Release Parent Summary ReportsParents Receive Reports6/3/126/30/12USDOEXConduct ELA/Math Confirmatory Standard Setting Final Cut Scores and Performance Standards Presented to State Board6/6/127/21/12USDOEXConduct Science/Social Studies Standard Setting Final Cut Scores and Performance Standards Presented to State Board6/6/127/21/12USDOEXConduct Alignment StudyReport Published4/15/1310/30/13internalXAnnual Operational AssessmentsParents Receive Reports6/3/126/30/14USDOETargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedBy the end of the 2011-12 school year, the State expects that 100% of DCAS-Alt1 tests will be in place, which will includes a fall and spring assessment.100%End of SY11-12otherxEducators trained who will administer the new assessments by end of SY 2011-12 100%SY11-12otherx

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

Multi-State AssesmentDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 6, 2014ProjectSelect projectMulti-State Assessment ConsortiaProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerBrian TouchetteUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchT&LCriterionSelect criterionB. Standards and AssessmentsSubcriterionSelect subcriterionB2. High-quality assessments

SummaryOverview of ProjectDDOE was a cooperative member state in two multi-state assessment consortia- Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) and The Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) - in order to participate in the development and piloting of summative assessments for elementary, middle school and high school students. Both consortia plan to contract with proven assessment vendors to construct these assessments with the intention of encouraging pilot use and potential adoption by participating states. Delaware became a Governing State in the SBAC and has begun active committee work and field testing participation. Once Delaware begins working with one of the consortium and the national assessment is operational and meets federal requirements, the long term goal is for the national assessment to replace DCAS. Projected completion of the assessments is listed for the 2013-2014 school year.

Accurate, multiple-point assessment data derived from both the current Delaware DCAS assessment, and, beginning in 2014-2015, the SBAC system of assessments, will combine with other teacher-designed measures of student progress to influence improvements in rigorous instruction based on the Common Core Standards, and measured through the DCAS or SBAC assessments given their link through test blueprint to CC Standards.

DDOE-imposed requirements on their LEA partners, and in turn, individual schools, require the detailed analysis of this student data by local educator teams, and, consequently, a linking of the current data to planned interventions such as academic support or modified classroom instruction or re-design of complete courses of instruction to improve student mastery of critical material.

DDOE is was a cooperative member state in two multi-state assessment consortia- Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) and The Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) - in order to participate in the development and piloting of summative assessments for elementary, middle school and high school students. Both consortia plan to contract with proven assessment vendors to construct these assessments with the intention of encouraging pilot use and potential adoption by participating states. Delaware became a Governing State in the SBAC and has begun active committee work and field testing participation. Once Delaware begins working with one of the consortium and the national assessment is operational and meets federal requirements, the long term goal is for the national assessment to replace DCAS. Projected completion of the assessments is listed for the 2013-2014 school year.

Accurate, multiple-point assessment data derived from both the current Delaware DCAS assessment, and, beginning in 2014-2015, the SBAC system of assessments, will combine with other teacher-designed measures of student progress to influence improvements in rigorous instruction based on the Common Core Standards, and measured through the DCAS or SBAC assessments given their link through test blueprint to CC Standards.

DDOE-imposed requirements on their LEA partners, and in turn, individual schools, require the detailed analysis of this student data by local educator teams, and, consequently, a linking of the current data to planned interventions such as academic support or modified classroom instruction or re-design of complete courses of instruction to improve student mastery of critical material.DDOE is was a cooperative member state in two multi-state assessment consortia- Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) and The Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) - in order to participate in the development and piloting of summative assessments for elementary, middle school and high school students. Both consortia plan to contract with proven assessment vendors to construct these assessments with the intention of encouraging pilot use and potential adoption by participating states. Delaware became a Governing State in the SBAC and has begun active committee work and field testing participation. Once Delaware begins working with one of the consortium and the national assessment is operational and meets federal requirements, the long term goal is for the national assessment to replace DCAS. Projected completion of the assessments is listed for the 2013-2014 school year.

Accurate, multiple-point assessment data derived from both the current Delaware DCAS assessment, and, beginning in 2014-2015, the SBAC system of assessments, will combine with other teacher-designed measures of student progress to influence improvements in rigorous instruction based on the Common Core Standards, and measured through the DCAS or SBAC assessments given their link through test blueprint to CC Standards.

DDOE-imposed requirements on their LEA partners, and in turn, individual schools, require the detailed analysis of this student data by local educator teams, and, consequently, a linking of the current data to planned interventions such as academic support or modified classroom instruction or re-design of complete courses of instruction to improve student mastery of critical material.DDOE is was a cooperative member state in two multi-state assessment consortia- Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) and The Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) - in order to participate in the development and piloting of summative assessments for elementary, middle school and high school students. Both consortia plan to contract with proven assessment vendors to construct these assessments with the intention of encouraging pilot use and potential adoption by participating states. Delaware became a Governing State in the SBAC and has begun active committee work and field testing participation. Once Delaware begins working with one of the consortium and the national assessment is operational and meets federal requirements, the long term goal is for the national assessment to replace DCAS. Projected completion of the assessments is listed for the 2013-2014 school year.

Accurate, multiple-point assessment data derived from both the current Delaware DCAS assessment, and, beginning in 2014-2015, the SBAC system of assessments, will combine with other teacher-designed measures of student progress to influence improvements in rigorous instruction based on the Common Core Standards, and measured through the DCAS or SBAC assessments given their link through test blueprint to CC Standards.

DDOE-imposed requirements on their LEA partners, and in turn, individual schools, require the detailed analysis of this student data by local educator teams, and, consequently, a linking of the current data to planned interventions such as academic support or modified classroom instruction or re-design of complete courses of instruction to improve student mastery of critical material.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Delawares participation on the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium as a Governing State will give DE an opportunity to influence the assessment design, participate in pilots and field testing, weigh in on refinements, and ultimately review for possible adoption in 2014-15. Implementing a common assessment aligned with the common core will provide robust data that will form the foundation for a data-driven approach to education and evaluation that will ultimately impact student achievement and preparation for college and careers. Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedDevelop List of DOE People for Test Development TeamsDDOE staff participate in 90% of conf. calls, meetings12/1/1012/15/10USDOEXConduct Review of Common Core Standards to Determine Assessment FocusDDOE staff participate in 90% of conf. calls, meetings2/1/112/28/11USDOEXFormulate Student Performance Evidence/Item TypesDDOE staff participate in 90% of conf. calls, meetings3/1/114/30/11USDOEXConvene Technical Advisory Committee on Test Design IssuesDDOE staff participate in 90% of conf. calls, meetings2/11/113/30/11USDOEXFormulate Test SpecificationsDDOE staff participate in 90% of conf. calls, meetings5/1/116/15/11USDOEXDevelop and Post RFP for Assessment VendorsDDOE staff participate in 90% of conf. calls, meetings6/15/117/30/11USDOEXReview All Received Assessment ProposalsContractor Selected8/15/1112/1/11USDOEXNegotiate Vendor ContractContract Approved9/16/111/1/12USDOEXContract Begins; Finalize Item BlueprintContractor Completes11/16/112/1/12USDOEXItem Pool DevelopedContractor Completes2/1/123/30/12USDOEXParticipate in first of twice-annual vendor-state dialogue meetings DDOE staff participate in 90% of conf. calls, meetings2/9/122/11/12USDOEXPilot Testing by Participating StatesDelaware Participates1/1/136/1/13USDOEXProduction of Field Test Forms by VendorContractor Completes4/1/129/1/13USDOEXField Tests Conducted by Participating StatesDelaware Participates8/25/125/28/14USDOE Analysis of Field Test Results; Test DevelopmentContractor Completes11/1/126/15/14USDOE Conduct Alignment StudiesContractor Completes3/1/136/15/14USDOEPotential Decision Point for Adoption by DelawareDDOE Leadership complies4/15/136/15/14USDOEFinal Adopted Assessment System Launch for StatesContractor Completes9/1/146/1/15USDOESummative Testing conducted by StatesDelaware Participates4/1/156/1/15USDOEFinal Adopted Assessment System Launch for StatesContractor Completes9/1/146/1/15USDOEPerformance Standards Are Set by ConsortiumContractor Completes6/15/156/20/15USDOEImpact on Delaware Student AchievementContractor Completes6/21/157/30/15USDOETargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedLEA participation rate in pilot testing (establish target)90%SY2012-13otherXLEA participation rate in field testing (establish target)90%SY2013-14other Teachers trained on new multi-state assessment, as measured by participation in training and survey feedback on quality of training90%SY2013-14other

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsDCAS AssessmentAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

STEM CouncilDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectSTEM CouncilProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerApril McCraeUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchT & LCriterionSelect criterionB. Standards and AssessmentsSubcriterionSelect subcriterionB3. Transition to enhanced standards and assessments

SummaryOverview of ProjectThe STEM project will be centralized around the powers, duties, and functions of Governor Markells STEM Council for the State of Delaware. Invested stakeholders throughout the country and state recognize the need to increase student achievement and attainment in K-12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. This can only be accomplished by preparing all schools to offer rigorous courses of study in STEM subjects, prepare more students for advanced study and careers in STEM disciplines to include underrepresented groups and women, and to expand the collaboration with industry experts, institutes of higher education, universities, research centers, and other community partners to assist teachers in integrating STEM content across grade and disciplines.

The STEM Council will collect, collate, and analyze STEM research publications and activities nationally and locally that have proven to increase student achievement. Recommendations of selected programs will be made to districts and charter schools to assist them in initiating new curriculum designs. Under the advisement of the STEM Council, the Department of Education will support districts and charter schools to improve test scores in science, mathematics, and other discipline areas related to standardized testing. This will be accomplished through high-quality professional development for administrators and teachers focusing on instructional and operational strategies proven to increase student achievement as well as the number of students from underrepresented groups obtaining degrees in STEM career pathways.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedCreate STEM Council Goals/Vision document completed Agenda setting1/3/102/28/11InternalXCollate STEM activities throughout DEWritten report on all current DE STEM pathways3/18/116/13/11InernalXCollate STEM models nationallyWritten report3/18/116/13/11InternalXAnalyze State & National STEM reportsFinal list of proven programs6/13/1112/31/11InternalXPresent results of state and national activities to STEM CouncilPresentation12/31/113/15/12InternalXSTEM Council makes recommendations for strategic state STEM plan-Targeted intervention on lowest performing districts on readiness examsList of national & State STEM programs Rewarding ScholarshipsDistricts/charters identified3/15/125/13/12InternalXDevelop an implementation PD plan based on recommendationsImpelementation planDistrict plansList of PD sites and providers8/8/119/30/11USEDXImplement recommendations/PD for districts and charter schoolsPD for districtsImplement programs10/3/116/3/12USEDXDevelop an evaluation of the implementation/PD of STEM activitiesEvaluation tool 10/3/1112/2/11USEDXEvaluate implentation planFeedback on district plan12/2/116/25/12USEDXReview/redesign programs for STEM initiatives Report6/25/128/20/12USEDXIncrease number of STEM courses/rigor/ increase underrepresented groupsReport8/20/129/19/12USEDXComplete and publish second annual report detailing STEM Council activities for 2011-12Report5/1/125/28/13InternalXCreate interactive website to facilitate outreach and communication efforts between the STEM Council, STEM advocates and the general public.Live website5/1/126/15/13InternalXIncrease number of underrepresented groups entering STEM related college courses w/out remediationReport8/20/115/30/15USEDTBC 2015TargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedIncrease Student participation in Honors and AP courses*8/25/12RTTTXImpact on 8th Grade Math65%68%8/25/20128/25/2013RTTTX*currently no state level targets, but we may consider setting some as part of the CCR planning currently underwayImpact on HS Graduation rates826/25/13RTTT

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsAP Summer Insititute, DCASAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

AP Summer InstituteDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectAP Summer InstituteProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerDebora HansenUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchT&LCriterionSelect criterionB. Standards and AssessmentsSubcriterionSelect subcriterionB3. Transition to enhanced standards and assessments

SummaryOverview of ProjectTo enhance advanced science and math course offerings, and courses in which Delaware students have historically underperformed, Delaware will invest in Advanced Placement (AP) Summer Institutes. This initiative is aimed at expanding the pool of teachers qualified to teach AP coursework and the number of students taking high quality AP courses. This effort would reach over 180 teachers and up to 22,500 students. The AP Institutes will be conducted during the summer at two specific sites at opposite geographic ends of Delaware focusing on all content-related areas.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)By investing in AP Summer Institutes that train teachers, the DDOE will increase the number of teachers qualified to teach AP coursework, therefore increase the availability and quality of AP courses for all students. Ultimately, increased access to rigorous AP coursework will result in students who are better prepared to enter and succeed in college and careers. Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedInitial Project Plan8/2/108/16/10USDOEXAnalyze past teacher and student AP course data9/17/1010/19/10USDOEXDetermine AP Summer Institutes using data and feedback on AP student performance and College Board evaluation to inform decisions10/22/1010/29/10USDOEXAP Summer Institute Promotion and Registration1/3/112/28/11USDOEXOffer AP Summer Institutes# of Teachers attended.# of AP courses offered7/15/118/15/11USDOEXDetermine AP Summer Institutes using data and feedback on AP student performance and College Board evaluation to inform decisions7/15/118/15/11USDOEXDistrict Analyzes Impact on Student AP Performance9/1/115/8/12USDOEXLEA / Building leadership implement student support measures9/1/116/30/12USDOEXAP Summer Institute Promotion and Registration# of teachers registered1/3/122/28/12USDOEXCollaborate with University of Delaware to ensure alignment between DDOE and their AP course offerings1/15/122/28/12InternalXSend confirmation notices to all registered participants at least twice between the time of registration and date of Institute6/15/127/15/12InternalXOffer pre-AP courses7/1/128/30/12InternalXOffer AP Summer Institutes# of Teachers attended.# of AP courses offered7/15/128/15/12USDOEXDetermine AP Summer Institutes using data and feedback on AP student performance and College Board evaluation to inform decisions7/15/128/15/12USDOEXDistrict Analyzes Impact on Student AP PerformanceAnalyze Data9/1/125/8/13USDOEXLEA / Building leadership implement student support measures9/1/126/30/13USDOEXCollaborate with University of Delaware to ensure alignment between DDOE and their AP course offerings1/15/132/28/13InternalXAP Summer Institute Promotion and Registration# of teachers registered2/1/136/1/13USDOEXSend confirmation notices to all registered participants at least twice between the time of registration and date of Institute6/15/137/15/13InternalXOffer pre-AP courses7/23/138/2/13InternalXOffer AP Summer Institutes# of Teachers attended. #of AP courses offered. 7/23/138/2/13USDOE XCollect and analyze teacher satisfaction data8/2/138/31/13Internal XCollect teacher and AP coordinator institute preferences for future planning # and nature of courses 12/1/1312/15/13Internal XDistrict Analyzes Impact on Student AP PerformanceAnalyze Data 9/1/135/1/14USDOELEA / Building leadership implement student support measures9/1/136/30/14USDOEAP Summer Institute Promotion and Registration# of teachers registered 2/28/146/15/14Internal Send confirmation notices to all registered participants at least twice between the time of registration and the date of the institute. 5/15/146/15/14Internal TargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedParticipation rate for AP Institute n/aAnnually RTTT# of AP courses offered annuallyn/aAnnually RTTT% of AP STEM course-takers who take AP testn/aAnnually Other% of AP test-takers who receive passing score (3 or higher)n/aAnnually Other% of High School Juniors Meeting College Readiness (SAT)n/aAnnually Other# of teachers registeredn/aAnnually RTTT# of teachers attendedn/aAnnually RTTTIncrease in # of students entering college with creditsn/aAnnually RTTT

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

Middle School PrepDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectMiddle School Prep and College ReadinessProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerShelley RouserUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchT&LCriterionSelect criterionB. Standards and AssessmentsSubcriterionSelect subcriterionB3. Transition to enhanced standards and assessments

SummaryOverview of ProjectTo increase the culture of preparing students for college and career readiness course work in high school, there needs to be an expansion of opportunities for rigorous coursework in the middle schools. To support districts in this endeavor, funding from RTTT will provide money for LEAs to purchase research-based programs that have demonstrated increased scores on college readiness exams (PSAT and SAT). Middle school LEA summative assessment data will be analyzed to determine which vendor program would be most appropriate to meet LEA needs.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)DDOE will support the ability of districts to prepare middle-school students for a successful high school experience and matriculation into college and the workforce, targeting in particular high-need or low-achieving students, through financial support to LEAs to implement one of four approved programs to enhance math and/or reading coursework in the middle grades. Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedDistricts analyze DCAS data to determine college and career readiness needs6/1/118/1/11USDOEXDOE Collates District Needs Data to complete vendor RFP process8/1/1110/1/11USDOEXVendor presentations to LEAs on effective practices 1/24/121/25/12InternalXDistricts directly work with selected vendors to set contract1/25/122/28/12InternalXAward funding to Districts based on middle school population 2/1/122/28/12InternalXVendors provide professional development based upon districts selected program 3/1/125/30/12InternalXFull implementation of Year 1 programs8/15/126/30/13InternalXDevelop Program Evaluation Protocols8/15/1212/15/13USDOEXFull implementation of Year 2 programs8/15/136/30/14USDOEEvaluate Effectiveness of District Implementation of Proposals 4/15/147/15/14USDOEAnalyze Evaluation Data to Determine Effectiveness7/15/149/15/14USDOEMake Recommendations to Move Programs Forward9/15/149/15/14USDOETargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedAP participation raten/a2013-142014-15RTTTHonors courses participation raten/a2013-142014-15RTTTSubgroup Student Reading Proficiency Middle School (DCAS) - African American, Hispanic, SWDn/a2013-142014-15OtherSubgroup Student Math Proficiency Middle School (DCAS) - African American, Hispanic, SWDn/a2013-142014-15OtherSubgroup Student Reading Proficiency High School (DCAS) - African American, Hispanic, SWDn/a2013-142014-15OtherSubgroup Student Math Proficiency High School (DCAS) - African American, Hispanic, SWDn/a2013-142014-15OtherIncreased high school graduation rates89.20%2016-17RTTT

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsData coaches, Data warehouse, STEM coachesAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

SATDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 14, 2014ProjectSelect projectSAT TestProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerBrian TouchetteUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchOtherCriterionSelect criterionB. Standards and AssessmentsSubcriterionSelect subcriterionB3. Transition to enhanced standards and assessments

SummaryOverview of ProjectStarting in the Fall 2010, the State of Delaware will implement the first statewide SAT assessment of college-readiness for all 11th grade students during the regular school day. This initiative will ensure more students take the test and increase the number of students to apply to college eliminating the number of barriers to testing. The major benefits of an SAT school day administration include: Improve access and convenience Increase overall student participation and create a college-going-culture Minimizes test-day stress because students are in a familiar location with familiar staffDDOE in conjunction with College Board will offer professional development to school personnel who will act as test center supervisors and test administrators. The College Board will also offer a tailored communications package to support each SAT school day administration for announcements/awareness, test day readiness and preparation, and post student reports for various stakeholders. SAT summary reports for each district will be provided to public/media. Other data reporting will be developed through conversations between DDOE staff and district staff.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Administering the SAT as a statewide assessment of college readiness for all Juniors statewide will increase participation rates and performance, especially among underrepresented minorities, and create a college-going culture throughout the state. Student reports will provide teachers with additional information to diagnose and address specific instructional needs of students. LEA and state-level reports will provide critical feedback on subgroup performance so that gaps can be addressed. Ultimately, DDOE collaboration with College Board to implement universal SAT administration will result in higher participation rates, greater enrollment in AP courses, higher college application rates, higher college enrollment rates, and greater success in college. Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedInitial Project plan startedFinal contract with Success Measures8/13/108/28/10USDOExTest vendor RFP posted & vendor chosenCompleted vendor contract9/10/1011/15/10USDOExTest administration & payment program developedStudent test count report.Payment program.11/15/101/14/11USDOExDevelop PD for Districts on Implementation of In-School SAT and Preparing Students for SAT 1/14/113/15/11USDOExStudent Registration2/1/112/28/11USDOExSAT In-School Administration4/11/114/22/11USDOExStudents and Districts Receive Results5/15/116/15/11USDOExCommunicate results statewide5/15/116/15/11USDOExProfessional Development on How to Analyze Data6/15/116/30/11USDOExDistricts implement Support programs targeted to marginal students & their parents6/30/1110/31/11USDOExDevelop PD for Districts on Implementation of In-School SAT and Preparing Students for SAT PD program completed12/15/113/15/12InternalxStudent RegistrationFinal report on actual students who registered for the exam2/1/122/28/12InternalxSAT In-School AdministrationFinal report on actual students who completed the exam4/11/124/22/12InternalxStudents and Districts Receive ResultsSAT Reports on student results deliverd to students,schools, district and state5/15/126/15/12InternalxCommunicate results statewide5/15/126/15/12InternalxProfessional Development on How to Analyze DataPD Program Complete6/15/126/30/12InternalxDistricts implement Support programs targeted to marginal students & their parentsDistrict Action Plan to target specific students (e.g., good SAT scores but who are not applying to colleges)6/30/1210/31/12InternalxDevelop PD for Districts on Implementation of In-School SAT and Preparing Students for SAT 12/7/123/15/13InternalxStudent Registration2/1/134/3/13InternalxSAT In-School Administration4/17/134/24/13InternalxStudents and Districts Receive Results5/15/136/14/13InternalCommunicate results statewide5/15/136/14/13InternalProfessional Development on How to Analyze Data6/14/136/28/13InternalDistricts implement Support programs targeted to marginal students & their parents6/28/1310/31/13InternalDevelop PD for Districts on Implementation of In-School SAT and Preparing Students for SAT 12/18/133/14/14InternalStudent Registration2/3/144/4/14InternalSAT In-School Administration4/16/144/23/14InternalStudents and Districts Receive Results5/19/145/30/14InternalCommunicate results statewide5/19/145/30/14InternalProfessional Development on How to Analyze Data6/18/146/30/14InternalDistricts implement Support programs targeted to marginal students & their parents6/30/1410/1/14InternalTargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedStudents receiving PSAT and SAT by end of SY 2011-12100%2010-11RTTTCollege enrollment rate70%2013-14RTTTCollege retention rate85%2013-14RTTT% of students who access College Boards practice test toolsN/AAnnuallyOther% of juniors taking the SAT100%2012-13RTTT# of juniors taking the SAT78852012-13RTTTMean SAT score for reading (School Day SAT)N/A2013-14OtherMean SAT score for math (School Day SAT)N/A2013-14OtherMean SAT score for writing (School Day SAT)N/A2013-14OtherMean SAT score for reading (Graduating Class)N/A2013-14OtherMean SAT score for math (Graduating Class)N/A2013-14OtherMean SAT score for writing (Graduating Class)N/A2013-14Other

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsData warehouse, Data coaches, Development coaches, MOUs with higher edAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

IMSDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectIdentity Management SystemProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerPaul PondUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchCriterionSelect criterionC. Data Systems to Support InstructionSubcriterionSelect subcriterionC2. Accessing and Using State Data

SummaryOverview of ProjectDevelopment of the Identity Management system is needed to support the infrastructure needs of Delaware's LDS to allow stakeholders to access information based on their specific role.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusSList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedVendor SelectedVendor Selected/Purchase Order9/1/109/14/10USDOEXTechnical DesignDesign Specifications9/14/1010/29/10USDOEXFinal DesignProject Plan Delivered10/29/1012/31/10USDOEXImplementation Phase IImplementation Starts12/31/103/6/11USDOEXTie to Insight Portal & DOE AppsSupports Portal and Single Sign-On3/6/116/23/11USDOEXGo LiveIdentities Created and Utilized Successfully6/23/118/23/11USDOEXTargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedN/AN/AN/AN/A

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsLDS Warehouse, Insight Portal, Single sign-onAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

Data WarehouseDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectData WarehouseProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerReese RobinsonUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchCriterionSelect criterionC. Data Systems to Support InstructionSubcriterionSelect subcriterionC2. Accessing and Using State Data

SummaryOverview of ProjectDelaware intends to improve our Longitudinal Data Systems systems structure for state and federal reporting, P-20 data integration, as well as set the standard for data systems around the country. Based on continuous feedback from our local school districts and charter schools, as well as the NCES Forum, EdFacts, and the Data Quality Campaign, Delaware will focus on the following areas. We will build with our agency partners a Client ID system to match clients among and between agencies to better serve them from preschool to adulthood. We will make our system interoperable with other agencies, states, and systems by documenting the Information Systems Architecture. We will move from stovepipes to a unified client management system data warehouse that will create standard codes, definitions, programming skills, ad hoc and programmed reports. This system will be enveloped around a new identify management system.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedRFP IssuedRFP Issued on time9/1/1012/6/10USDOEXRFP ResponsesResponses submitted12/6/101/28/11USDOEXRFP Evaluation & vendor selectionTarget Start Date Met1/28/114/11/11USDOEXAnalysis & Technical Design Requirements Addressed4/11/116/24/11USDOEXWarehouse DevelopmentTeacher's Insight Supported6/24/119/1/11USDOEXWarehouse ExpansionOther Dashboards Supported9/1/113/30/12USDOEXTargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedN/A

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsDashboard portal development, Identity managementAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

Web Portal DevelopmentDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectWeb Portal DevelopmentProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerReese RobinsonUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchCriterionSelect criterionC. Data Systems to Support InstructionSubcriterionSelect subcriterionC2. Accessing and Using State Data

SummaryOverview of ProjectDOE will develop a Dashboard Portal to differentiated "dashboards" based on stakeholder roles. Each dashboard will feature full longitudinal and trend information. Each dashboard will be customized to meet stakeholder needs and interests, and will be designed to provide the necessary data and context to inform common decisions made by each stakeholder user group.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedRFP IssuedRFP Issued on time9/1/1012/13/10USDOEXRFP ResponsesResponses submitted12/13/102/15/11USDOEXRFP Evaluation & vendor selectionTarget Start Date Met2/15/115/6/11USDOEXAnalysis & Technical Design Meet deadline for development5/6/119/2/11USDOEXTeacher's Insight DashboardOn-time, meeting metrics9/2/113/30/12USDOEXRoll out other dashboardsOn-time, meeting metrics3/30/123/31/13USDOEXTargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedNumber of unique Educational Dashboard Portal Users (1 or more login per year)3,1006,3008,500SY 12-13SY 13-14SY 14-15RTTTXX

Number of Educational Dashboard Portal visits25,00075,000100,000SY 12-13SY 13-14SY 14-15RTTT23,000 YTD

No. of stakeholders providing feedback on the Educational Dashboard Portal500500500SY 12-13SY 13-14SY 14-15RTTT250 YTD

% of Portal users surveyed reporting that the data was used to inform their decision-making90%SY 13-14RTTT88%

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsData coaches, Identity management, Data warehouseAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

Data DictionaryDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectData DictionaryProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerReese RobinsonUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchCriterionSelect criterionC. Data Systems to Support InstructionSubcriterionSelect subcriterionC2. Accessing and Using State Data

SummaryOverview of ProjectAs a component of the longitudinal warehouse and performance management dashboards, an online metadata dictionary will be developed. This will consolidate information in exisiting dictionaries and extend it to include statewide standard definitions and codes aligned with national standards for DOE and partner organizations.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedWarehouse and data RFPs IssuedRFP Issued on time12/1/1012/31/10USDOEXRFP ResponsesResponses submitted12/31/102/15/11USDOEXRFP Evaluation & vendor selectionTarget Start Date Met2/15/114/1/11USDOEXAnalysis & Technical Design Meet deadline for design4/1/118/15/11USDOEXWarehouse dictionaryDictionary integrated into work process of Technology Group8/15/1112/31/11USDOEXDashboard dictionaryDictionary publshed and available to users8/15/113/31/12USDOEXTargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedN/A

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsData coaches, data warehouse, dashboardAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

Client ID CrosswalkDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectClient ID CrosswalkProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerReese RobinsonUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchCriterionSelect criterionC. Data Systems to Support InstructionSubcriterionSelect subcriterionC2. Accessing and Using State Data

SummaryOverview of ProjectThis client ID crosswalk is a subsystem of Education Insight intended to collect and store different agency client identifiers and store them for matching and identification purposes. It will reduce the redundancy of data maintained by agencies and allow the use of current identification systems in conjunction with systems from other agencies.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedRequirements analysisAccurate requirements9/1/1210/30/12USDOEXSystem designDesign implements requirements10/30/1211/30/12USDOEXSystem developmentExecutable system11/30/124/30/13USDOEXTestingAcceptance test4/30/135/31/13USDOEXTrainingTraining complete5/31/136/30/13USDOEDeploymentOperational system6/30/1312/31/13USDOETargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedN/A

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsWarehouseAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

Student Data ExchangeDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectStudent Data ExchangeProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerBruce DaceyUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchCriterionSelect criterionC. Data Systems to Support InstructionSubcriterionSelect subcriterionC2. Accessing and Using State Data

SummaryOverview of ProjectThe project will allow for electronic exchange of student data between school districts within Delaware and between Delaware school districts and colleges or universities. This goes beyond the ability to send copies of student transcripts (which will also be supported) but allows for the exchange of student data records based on the standard set by the Postsecondary Electronic Standards Council.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)To be successful this the SDE program should be able to send a transcript to a college or university, and or tranfer electronic transcipt data between school districts, on a daily basis and with accuracy and completeness.Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedVendor selectionProject proposal and PO signed8/16/109/24/10USDOEXTechnical designDesign implements requirements9/24/1010/30/10USDOEXImplementation pilot phase I course codesRequirements addressedPhase 1 and 2 completed by March 201110/30/103/16/11USDOEXImplementation of phase IAcceptance testUser feedback3/16/1111/5/11USDOEXPhase 2-Standardize GPA, TranscriptsTraining completeUser feedback11/5/118/1/12USDOEXDeploymentOperational systemDistrict use8/1/129/1/12USDOEXTargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedN/AN/AN/AN/A

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsStudent data, Dashboard, WarehouseAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceThis SDE project has continued monthly with training school districts and charters, outreach to our colleges and universities, and efforts to leverage the SDE and Course Code projects for additional applications and uses. For example using the State GPA calculations as a model we have developed a GPA calculation based on NCAA requirements. BudgetInsert Budget Overview

Common Course CodesDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectCommon Course CodesProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerBruce DaceyUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchCriterionSelect criterionC. Data Systems to Support InstructionSubcriterionSelect subcriterionC2. Accessing and Using State Data

SummaryOverview of ProjectDevelopment of common state course codes enables us to compare course taking, grades, and teachers among all the districts and charters. This will also enable electronic transfer of student transcript records between school districts, colleges and universities, and other districts outside of Delaware. This project is for the standardization of all course codes between high schools in Delaware with an option to expand middle school courses.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Delaware's pupil accounting system has separate databases for each district and charter school. Each district or charter manages their own course catalog including course numbers. A successful state common course code system would allow for the identification of courses throughout the state based on the state course code and regardless of the local district or charter course code. For example the state course code for Algebra I is 02052. If we query our state database for all courses with a state course code of 02052, we may have 40 different local course numbers and slightly different descriptions. Using a state course code all districts and charters are speaking the same language but have the ability to modify their systems for their own local needs.Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedVendor selectedVendor selected/purchase order8/13/1010/31/10USDOEXDistrict trainingImplementation starts11/1/1012/30/10USDOEXHigh school academic codesEnd of course codedAcademic courses codedVocational courses coded1/1/118/31/11USDOEXHigh school elective codesElective courses coded9/1/1112/30/11USDOEXOptional middle school expansionMiddle school courses coded12/30/1112/30/12USDOEXTargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedN/AN/AN/AN/A

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsStudent data exchangeAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceCourse codes are reveiwed and updated daily. Work will continue with the districts and charters on quality control and future uses of state course codes.BudgetInsert Budget Overview

Project ManagementDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectProject ManagementProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerReese RobinsonUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchCriterionSelect criterionC. Data Systems to Support InstructionSubcriterionSelect subcriterionC2. Accessing and Using State Data

SummaryOverview of ProjectSuccess with developing and implementing the components of the LDS Warehouse and Dashboard projects requires the attention of a fulltime Project Manager. The Project Manager would be responsible for planning, organizing, and managing all aspects of Education Insight.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedRecruitmentProject manager on board7/1/107/31/10USDOEXManage RFI processResponses submitted7/31/1012/1/10USDOEXManage RFP processVendor selection12/1/104/1/11USDOEXWarehouse managementOn-time, On-budget4/1/113/31/12USDOEXDashboard managementOn-time, On-budget4/1/113/31/12USDOEXWarehouse and dashboard expansionOn-time, On-budget3/31/126/30/13USDOETargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedN/A

Connected/Impacted ProjectsList related projects that may have an impact on other RTTT projects or be impacted by other RTTT projectsID Management, Common Course Codes, Dashboard, Data Coaches, Data Warehouse, ID CrosswalkAdditional notesProvide additional notes, such as anticipated risks, key players, resources needed, or related projects in this spaceBudgetInsert Budget Overview

Data Governance and IHE MOUDelaware Department of Education Race to the Top Delivery Plan Updated February 12, 2014ProjectSelect projectEnterprise Warehouse Data Governance Council and IHE MOUsProject OwnerEnter name of delivery plan ownerAlan PhillipsUnit/BranchSelect unit/branchDUCriterionSelect criterionC. Data Systems to Support InstructionSubcriterionSelect subcriterionC2. Accessing and Using State Data

SummaryOverview of ProjectThe Enterprise Warehouse Data Governance Council Delivery Plan originally assumed a new organization would be formed to address inter-agency data governance. It was subsequently decided that the existing Delaware P-20 Council could be assigned the role of inter-agency data governance administration and in that capacity would also lead the development of data-sharing MOUs between DDOE and IHEs (as well as other entities). It was determined that legislative changes would be needed to both assign and reorganize the P-20 Council in order to equip it to assume data governance responsibilities. House Bill 213, passed on June 30, 2011, effected those changes.

Goal StatementFor each project, articulate the theory of action for achieving intended outcome (e.g., what does successful implementation look like?)The P-20 Council will understand the responsibilities regarding data governance conferred on them by HB 213 and have a plan for implementation. By overseeing the P-20 Councils data governance responsibilities and being a responsible party in implementing the Councils recommendations, the DDOE will ensure that a clear plan for data ownership and sharing is in place to enable statewide, cross-agency collaboration and tracking of students. DOEs most immediate needs from this action are pertinent to data exchange with the states public and private IHEs in order to measure enrollment and college course completions; however, the long-term goal is to position the state for additional inter-agency data exchange initiatives, such as with agencies that provide early childhood education and services and agencies that track labor and economic data.Measures of SuccessStart DateEnd DateDeliverable TypeStatusKey DeliverablesList all deliverables by project, with a separate row for each deliverable (as many as are necessary). This must include all deliverables from your Race to the Top delivery plan, and can include any additional deliverables (e.g., contractual deliverables) as desired. Include specific tasks underneath each deliverable as needed, but do not include separate lines. Where relevent, list success measures for each deliverableList current start date associated with each deliverableList current date due associated with each deliverableSelect "USDOE" or "internal" Check if deliverable has been completedDraft legislation that expands the P-20 Council and provides DOE with the authority to receive and store interagency unit-record data.2/2/114/7/11USDOExDiscuss proposed legislative changes at P-20 Council and request participation on data governance policy subcommittee 4/7/115/31/11InternalxData governance policy subcommittee drafts legislative changes. 5/31/116/15/11InternalxFinalize and pass legislation via normal legislative process6/15/116/30/11InternalxPassed legislation is an agenda item at P-20 Council meeting 7/7/117/7/11InternalxData governance policy sub-committee is formed to develop framework for DOE regulatory changes needed to facilitate data-sharing between agencies and institutions that P-20 Council members7/7/1110/7/11InternalxForm a data governance sub-committee to develop a model Data Governance Handbook that will serve to implement HB 213 as a policy and regulatory framework 10/7/1110/7/11InternalxPresent proposed Data Governance Handbook and model to the P-20 Council10/8/1112/7/11InternalxDraft changes to DOE regulations via the normal regulatory change process1/1/127/1/12InternalxSign new agreements for data sharing with IHEs7/1/124/30/13USDOExCollect public & and private IHE data, per terms of the Data Sharing Agreements5/1/137/30/13InternalIndividual school reporting, as required by IHE's and terms of the Data Sharing Agreements8/1/138/30/13InternalRe-activate P-20 Data Committee (DDOE/IHE representation) to address P-20 Research Agenda items6/1/1310/1/13InternalReports rates of enrollment, 1st year retention, credit accumulation and remediation9/1/1312/31/13InternalTargetTarget DateMeasure TypeMeasure Achieved?Performance MetricsList all measures by project, with a separate row for each measure. This must include all QUANTITATIVE measures from your Race to the Top delivery plan/the RTTT plan, and can include any additional measures (e.g., contractual measures) as desired. List the target for the measure; if there were no targets in the RTTT plan or delivery plan, list N/AList target date for each measureSelect "RTTT", "RTTT APR" or "other" for additional measures not required by RTTT (e.g. contractual)Check box if measure has been reachedRates of enrollment of DE public high school graduates in DE IHEs 70%6/30/14RTTTCollege course completions rates - # of students who complete 1 year of college credits in DE IHEs within 2 years of graduation from high school85%6/30/14RTTTMOUs for increased data-sharing signed by six out of six in-State higher education institutions by the 2011-2012 school year.64/30/13RTTTx

Connected/Impacted Projec